On 3/19/2013 11:24 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 19.03.2013 19:17 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1:38:21 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
Intimate relation is not causality. The stock market has been
famousl
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:06:51 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> > To recap then, the difference between non-living and living is only
> visible
> > to the living. Biological units are vastly larger and slower, more
> > vuln
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> To recap then, the difference between non-living and living is only visible
> to the living. Biological units are vastly larger and slower, more
> vulnerable in a thousand ways than molecular units, but they are a sign of a
> nested relati
>
> The argument for my view is an inference from roughly four premises:
>
> (1) Conscious experience exists.
>
> (2) Conscious experience is not logically supervenient on the physical.
>
> (3) If there are positive facts that are not logically supervenient on the
> physical facts, then physicali
On 3/21/2013 6:04 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:46:11PM +0100, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> But still, I tend to bet that creativity, if he can exploit it, is still
>>> independent of it.
>> I still find it hard to gr
On 3/21/2013 4:40 PM, John Mikes wrote:
> Dear Bruno,
> it is so fascinating to read about "universal machines".
> Is there a place where I could learn in short, understandable terms
> what they may be? Then again the difference between a 'Turing machine'
> and a 'physical computer' (what I usuall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMXqyf13HeM
DEAN RADIN: Men Who Stare at Photons, Part 1 | EU 2013
Skip to the last 10 minutes for the brain evidence if you like.
Craig
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from th
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:46:11PM +0100, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > But still, I tend to bet that creativity, if he can exploit it, is still
> > independent of it.
>
> I still find it hard to grasp how we could have a creative process
> witho
Dear Bruno,
it is so fascinating to read about "universal machines".
Is there a place where I could learn in short, understandable terms what
they may be? Then again the difference between a 'Turing machine' and a
'physical computer' (what I usually call our embryonic Kraxlwerk).
I grew up into my
On 3/21/2013 12:18 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 22:59 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 1:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
At the Occam's time, realists were people who have beli
On 21 Mar 2013, at 02:32, Stephen P. King wrote:
Are physical computers truly "universal Turing Machines"? No! They
do not have infinite tape, not precise read/write heads. They are
subject to noise and error.
The infinite tape is not part of the universal machine. A universal
machine i
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:28:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm
>
> "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex *as a whole*. The
> brain is a non-stop, always-act
On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm
"We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex as a whole.
The brain is a non-stop, always-active system. When we perceive
something, the information does not end up in a sp
On 20 Mar 2013, at 21:08, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/20/2013 6:43 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Stephen P. King > wrote:
http://www.closertotruth.com/video-profile/What-is-the-Nature-of-Personal-Identity-Peter-van-Inwagen-/176
He starts off with a straightf
On 20 Mar 2013, at 21:01, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 19.03.2013 22:25 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
...
I see a bit of irony in the fact that people who believe in
physical reality often cal
On 20 Mar 2013, at 20:18, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 19.03.2013 22:25 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Since I´m more in the side of Aquinas/Aristotle -or even Plato
sometimes- I don not share the Occam views.Occam was a nominalist,
that is rejected t
On 20 Mar 2013, at 20:16, John Mikes wrote:
3-19-13 John M wrote:
---
"...I am not faithful enough to believe in MY free will and go
to hell by force of this misconception. I may make mistakes.
I am not deterministically forced to comply with all facets of the
On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:51, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/3/20 Bruno Marchal
On 19 Mar 2013, at 22:25, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Since I´m more in the side of Aquinas/Aristotle -or even Plato
sometimes-
?
I see Plato and Aristotle as the most opposite view we can have on
reality.
(To be
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:42:34 AM UTC-4, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>
> Leibnizian causation differs from most other forms of causation in that
> no forces are involved, only ideas, although from any objective viewpoint
> it might seem "as if" the usual types of forces cause the event.
> This
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:42:02 AM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 Tom Bayley > wrote:
>
>
>> > I think explanations are important to prove causation ;-) and it's
>> interesting that you can break this example down. Each explanatory step is
>> materially plausible (it
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 Tom Bayley wrote:
> > I think explanations are important to prove causation ;-) and it's
> interesting that you can break this example down. Each explanatory step is
> materially plausible (it has a satisfactory public explanation), right up
> to the perception of the light
Leibnizian causation differs from most other forms of causation in that
no forces are involved, only ideas, although from any objective viewpoint
it might seem "as if" the usual types of forces cause the event.
This makes sense if the resultant situation is a meaningful one
because generated by t
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:44:16 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> >> How could something non-living lead to something living?
> >
> >
> > Non-living and living are just different qualities of experience. Living
> > systems a
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 19 Mar 2013, at 17:34, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19 Mar 2013, at 16:52, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Russell Standish
wrot
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42:38 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> >> At least you now agree that the atoms in my body could be replaced and
> >> I would feel the same. What if the atoms were replaced by a person:
> >> would
On 21.03.2013 12:44 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/21/2013 7:30 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 21.03.2013 12:20 Stephen P. King said the following:
...
How do we forget what we cannot even know that we know?
As far as I know, that's the main Sartre's point. You just start
with tha
On 3/21/2013 7:30 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> On 21.03.2013 12:20 Stephen P. King said the following:
>>
>> On 3/21/2013 3:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
>>> On 20.03.2013 22:14 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/20/2013 4:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> On 20.03.2013 20:18 meeker
On 21.03.2013 12:20 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/21/2013 3:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 22:14 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/20/2013 4:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote
On 3/21/2013 3:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> On 20.03.2013 22:14 Stephen P. King said the following:
>>
>> On 3/20/2013 4:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
>>> On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> On 19.03.2013 22:25 Alberto G. Corona
On 20.03.2013 22:06 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:51 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
...
Are you a follower of La Rouche? I do not see such opposition
between Plato and Aristotle . Aristotle believed in essences and
ideas and in the the inner sense of what is right, jus
On 20.03.2013 22:14 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/20/2013 4:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 19.03.2013 22:25 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
...
Presumably his positions about
On 20.03.2013 22:59 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 1:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
At the Occam's time, realists were people who have believed that
universals exist. Occam has employed
32 matches
Mail list logo
