per account, but thankfully, in E2K they are auto-generated.
The FAQ has some info on defining recipient policies I believe.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp
There are plenty of alternatives to OWA... Are you talking about using their
mail client, or their 'proxy services' for OWA access? If it's the latter,
do you know of any technical differences between their approach and that
used by Whale communications? And.. Are those features compelling over
-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Borderware Mxtreme
There are plenty of alternatives to OWA... Are you talking about using their
mail client, or their 'proxy services' for OWA access
Ah.. If you'd shown your work, I would have just passed on the slipstick
URL. ;)
On 12/18/02 10:09, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh.
I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now.
Thanks
Heiko Herold
IANAL, but I do know that the legality of accessing mail in a mailbox varies
greatly depending on the jurisdiction. And since IANAL, I know better than
to try and figure out whether it may or may not be legal for myself or
someone else to do so. I leave that determination to the blood sucking
I use MessageView to parse my Exchange logs for reporting. There are a
number of other 3rd party reporting tools for Exchange as well listed at
Google.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Use a single mailbox, share it and add it to your profiles.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We have just recently migrated to Exchange 2000 and are
experiencing a few problems when
http://www.amrein.com/apps/page.asp?Q=392
-Original Message-
From: Schneider.Rudy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 SP 4
Outlook 2K
I'm able to post my Public Folder\Calendar to our
Web/Intranet;
be tremendous, even if it does seem 'less painful' to do it just good
enough.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I
Use an x.400 connector or (probably even better) an SMTP for directory
replication (if this is 5.5).
-Original Message-
From: Owen Parry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We have a remote site which is a sub-domain of our
The information is contained in the tracking logs. You could write a script
to pull the information from them (sample scripts just might be found at
www.swinc.com) or you could use a 3rd party tool like.. oh, MessageView to
collect that information among other things.
-Original Message-
If you type in the SMTP address in question and hit Alt-K, what does it
resolve to?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone
outside
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Doesn't it have to map back to SOMETHING, tho?
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I don't believe that the RFCs require the sender address to map back to the
person who sent the message.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Won't that violate RFCs, tho?
Drew
I believe so, but you'll likely want to test your particular configuration
in a lab prior to upgrading. You'll also want to have a clear long term
strategy for completing the migration.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002
What AutoAccept utility is that? What permissions do users have on those
folders?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4
I am beginning to
Have they asked you to restore from last known good backup and replay the
logs or move the users to a new machine and delete the information store
from this one and then move the users back?
Or, more specifically what have they suggested?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen
If money weren't an object, I'd likely be using CommVault at all of my
customers sites. BE is a nice balance for the features and performance for a
lot of shops though.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:33 AM
To:
It is delivered to the members.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has
no members?
www.cdolive.com in the sample scripts
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have been requested to create a form in Outlook that will
allow the sender to be anonymous to the
Google no help?
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Email_Groupware/Exchange_Server/Q
_20138049.html
-Original Message-
From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Running into a very odd issue..
- Running
Type EHLO and you ought to be able to determine if it is Exchange since E2K
uses an extended set of verbs over IIS.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/29/2002 6:18 AM
Subject: SMTP banner
Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else)
A cold standby server is often not a simple as one might think (e.g.
actually testing failover[1] prior to a production disaster would probably
be an extremely good idea). Depending on ones definition of minimal effort,
you may or may not be pleased with the results.
Not sure why you can't get
and
POP3 profile OK (which will display the contacts) but when I
go to send
messages (via BTOpenworld's SMTP server, which will only allow my
BTOpenworld account to send mail) they seem to just disappear into the
ether. No bounce back message, no delivery. Any ideas?
From: Chris Scharff
Sure, if their router or %network hardware% supports QoS.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/27/2002 11:05 PM
Subject: Throttling bandwidth with exchange 2000
Hi All
Does anyone know how to throttle the bandwidth that exchange uses to
send out mail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: When using a Smart Host, mail does not flow
between Exchange servers but does to the Internet
Q265293
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
A user approached me and asked if there was a way he could
get the email addresses from all messages in his inbox.
Peter Peedu [MS] wrote...
Check the following files.
How to determine if you are using 56bit or 128 bit encryption on
SECURITY.DLL , NTLMSSPS.DLL and SCHANNEL.DLL file.
Take properties and Version the description of the file will tell.
SECURITY.DLL
NtLm Security Support Provider Client DLL
Order the steaks. They are excellent.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha
Steaks which cannot be deleted.Get an unknown
a. Disable the license logging service (it's broken) and use
VisualInterNotepad to track your license compliance.
b. multiple logons are covered multiple times in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Freeman
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/21/2002 4:12 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.0
Don't believe it is a configurable value, but an MCS engagement could
probably get you a 1GB warning.
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/26/2002 7:52 AM
Subject: Outlook 2002 2GB Warning
Outlook 2002 provides a warning when a PST or OST file
The server isn't answering on port 25.
C:\telnet mail.simonbond.com 25
Connecting To mail.simonbond.com...
Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed
C:\telnet 217.39.149.150 25
Connecting To 217.39.149.150...
Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed
Don't believe there is/was one. There was however a citrix ICA solution for
Mac OS9 users.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I know OT but you all know a lot and I am at my wits end
Your IMS doesn't appear to be what is exposed to the internet, are you
looking at the mail logs of mail.wtwarch.com? Those would likely provide
better information than the Exchange IMS logs would.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November
Guess your Pittsburg slang is a bit rusty Jim? You're getting divorced, you
ought to be out celebrating. *sheesh* ;)
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well...
The only
Reference?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi there,
According to technet it should be opossible to autmatically
save the contact details of a recipient you reply to in the
Have the effected users create a new Outlook profile.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Ok...here's the problem (It's kinda weird and I'm not sure
I'm gonna explain this
To: Exchange Discussions
Favorite folders maybe?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: RE: Problems with Event ID 1023...
Have the effected users create a new
Q265293?
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Having trouble getting internal email flowing between
Exchange servers when we setup a smart host.
Here's the scenario:
A single
,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What is the design goal?
-Original
, November 25, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Ha ha!!!
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002
Yep. You are.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
How long is deleted items retention set for? I think it
counts that (could be wrong).
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
is that so
far it looks like you are attempting to create a technical
solution to address a non-technical problem.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd
Well, 287677 might work as well depending on what the actual problem to be
solved is, but apparently this isn't the week for properly phrased technical
questions.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange
this for me.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, 287677 might work as well depending on what the actual
problem to be solved is, but apparently this isn't the week
for properly
the switch in the
scheduled task to run Outlook.exe, setup Outlook to dial if
there is no connection, run a send/receive, and be done with
it. Or if there was a
third party app that would do this for me.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
.
When did I say there was no such thing as Outlook XP?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You failed to provide sufficient detail in the question so
that those trying to provide
To: Exchange Discussions
Oh no my only purpose now is to sit on this list and point
out every time you're an ass to everyone. Good thing you
don't keep me waiting long
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday
Hello? He quoted the exact same paragraph from eventID.net in his original
post. He indicated it didn't apply and asked for additional insight.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/21/2002 11:42 PM
Subject: RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?
This
Have the remote monitoring machines utilize SMTP AUTH or put a basic SMTP
server on the machines doing the monitoring so they can route mail on their
own.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
That doesn't appear to tell Tony anything more than he already stated he
knew. Perhaps you could explain to him the differences between a -1018 error
and a -1019 error?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 PM
Oversnipped so I have no idea what you are responding to.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We do not need an application on the remote machines for
sending the e-mail alerts. Looking
Oversnipped again, but SMTP AUTH seems to meet the desired objective of the
original query.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This
Not sure how your environment is configured, but in mine it doesn't effect
internal users at all. None of my internal users use SMTP... Well, there is
the Mac guy, but his client is already configured to use SMTP AUTH with his
own NT credentials. Adding one or one hundred more user accounts
Brick level backup errors are between you and your god; you should be
sharing them with your priest, not a technical list.
Do real, full backups run successfully? And if not, what /specifically/ is
the error message associated with their failure.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller
Insufficient data.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a
cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active
was
http://www.rmcons.com/html/RegistryValues/Services/MSExchangeIMC/Parameters/
RerouteViaStore.htm
-Original Message-
From: Sullivan, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am having trouble with my Exchange 5.5
with my
remote clients, but I am optimistic.
Thanks again.
Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ResolveP2
Is the RUS running?
-Original Message-
From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they
do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the
Exchange
Use CleanSweep from BORK.
-Original Message-
From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office
Assistant for one of our users will not send out the
: Problems with default message in OOA
What does CleanSweep do and what is BORK?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with default message in OOA
Use
And none of that information seemed relevant enough to include in the
original post? You can't resolve the name using the Outlook client, does it
appear in the GAL? On all machines? Error messages in the event log?
Changes?
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
What is the design goal?
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in
Outlook XP that I could create a scheduled task that would
open
/receive. Currently it
takes user intervention to perform the function and we are looking for a
way to automate it.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
availability section. In general, the way most solutions are structured
today, you'll want to be very cognizant of the potential bandwidth
implications.
[1] I have more to add, just haven't had time.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message
As part of the research (part of the very early on research IMO) I'd
recommend getting groups of likely users together for brief meetings (brown
bag lunches possibly) where they could provide a list of features they'd
like to have in using a PDA. Then work with them to prioritize the list and
use
No pitfalls other than you can't actually do it that way.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Got a question for you all. In the planning stages of a E2K
migration from
5.5 SP4.
Exchange 5.5 doesn't do protocol proxing for POP3/IMAP. Users need to point
directly to the server their mailbox resides on to retrieve mail via these
protocols. So, as darcy suggested move all users to the same box or publish
a pop2, pop3 and pop4 PRN. E2K will support protocol porying with the
-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Why couldn't you if you are in mixed-mode?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:07 PM
where looking
to just export mailboxes to PST and re-import. However, the
more I look at it, there does not seem to be any way to avoid
using an ADC unless we just do a complete, at once, cut-over to E2K.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools
are installed.
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in
To: Exchange Discussions
Just curious, does exch 2k do protocol proxy for pop/smtp?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 on Exchange 5.5
Exchange 5.5 doesn't do protocol
Oh... PFs don't have free/busy information, so using a PF is possible, but
generally sub optional. However, they can certainyl be scripted to accept
meeting requests (don't think even ERM does though since it's a very non
standard way of doing things).
-Original Message-
From:
Exchange Resource Manager... www.swinc.com
-Original Message-
From: Imran Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have a number of Public Folders setup as calendars for
meeting rooms.
This allows users to easily
If the only errors you are getting are related to Veritas BLBs reporting
corrupt messages in Top of Information Store And not -1018 or other
Exchange related database corruption reporting errors then I believe you
should be looking at fixing the technical administration problems you are
In my lab? No. In production? Haven't ever had the inclination to try.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Has anyone experienced any problems with Exchange or OWA on a
What do you plan on doing with the information you are extracting?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does anyone know of a good DL Reporting tool? I have looked
at Imanami,
, we will use the
information for some initial cleanup and eventually tie into
some custom coding that will sync the DLs between the Ex55
and Ex2K environments.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange
.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Reporting Tool
And what format would you like the data in to be able to
facilitate cleanup and tying into the sync code
Center/East West Center 590 Lipoa Parkway
Suite 259 Kihei, HI. 96753
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Reporting Tool
Well, the reason I asked is because I'm
...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Reporting Tool
So you want something which will give you the name of the DL,
the names of the members and their associated
www.mail-resources.com | web links | exchange | high availability lists a
few more.
I've tested some, but really am not in a position to comment on their
products since my company competes in the space on some level.
--
Chris Scharff
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=
inde
xreq=viewarticleartid=1 (link wrap and all that)
-Original
) [mailto:Eugene.McCarthy;fao.org]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
The old Exchange client. I've got to find a simple way to convert MS Mail
mmf files into Outlook 2002 (i.e. without installing OL98 etc. on XP).
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
That doesn't exactly work. Exchange will create an SMTP address
(encapsulated x.400) for them on the fly for outbound messages and that can
be used to reply.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange
There really is some attractive licensing for ASPs in E2K. It's not perfect
yet, but with a couple of moderate changes on Microsoft's part an aggressive
ASP could likely provide Exchange very competitively to businesses of a
variety of sizes.
That being said, the track record for ASPs in general
use it and add
all the people you want to be able to send to the internet to it..
Better, Chris? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disable external email
send and don't have an SMTP addy, then how is
anyone going to address them from the outside?
=:^]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disable external email
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=inde
xreq=viewarticleartid=1 (link wrap and all that)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Greetings,
I'm
Nah.. only if some mail server inserts them (which Exchange doesn't).
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
There should still be For addr in the headers, though, as part of
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:erik;epicentric.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi,
If you have two domains and they fully trust each other can an NT account
in
domain a be mapped to an exchange account in domain b?
Exchange32.exe being... the old Exchange client or the windows messaging
client which doesn't work with Exchange.. or something completely different?
-Original Message-
From: McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) [mailto:Eugene.McCarthy;fao.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 3:48 AM
To:
Can you define a resource?[1] It's certainly possible to do.
[1] Is that a link to info on how or an application which actually does it?
-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:Steve.Bevilacqua;suntrust.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange
Is the e-mail address for reporting documentation mistakes in that paper (if
so, you should report them), if not, I can get you the address so you can
report the mistakes and they'll update the paper accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M.
OK, this may be a wacky question but have to ask it.
1)In an Exchange 5.5 environment, is there anyway to route server to
server traffic through a 3rd party gateway, ie IS-MTA-Sendmail. This
being a strategy to contain viruses on each server by filtering through
Sendmail-Milter.
Any way?
Eric you've been on the same lists I have for the past 4+ years, do you
really expect helpful answers from anyone when you use the M$ moniker?
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:MicrosoftExchangeListServer;csi.exch.cgnet.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14,
that the exchange server is plugged into.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op
Monitoring and Managing Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server
ISBN: 18232X
Or its 5.5 cousin.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Where can I find information about priv.edb.
Check the FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:rajia;envbop.govt.nz]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi
Using Exchange 5.5 how can I disable a user from receiving and sending
external email, but still able to send withing the
to do with messages showing up in the inbox. I could care less about
the small envelop icon showing up...I just want messages to appear after
they are sent.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:58 PM
701 - 800 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
