I don't like it when mommy and daddy fight.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Baker, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
This coming from a person who dresses in black
Are we there yet? I have to use the bathroom.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
I don't like it when mommy and daddy
Mom!! Andy's breathing again!!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
Are we there yet? I have to use the
Stop it all of you.
Lori, go to your room, Andy, cross your legs.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 January 2002 17:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Someone hogging the can again?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
Are we there yet? I have to use the bathroom.
ahhh... I remember you now! yeesss...
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
All's fair in war. I am a birds and bees guru.
black widow
Then you would be dead.
/black widow
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Baker, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
ahhh... I remember you now! yeesss...
We can surely tell that it is Friday, can't we.
I like this much better than that other thing you do on Friday.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original
Work?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
We can surely tell that it is Friday, can't we.
I like this much better than
At 11:08 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, Hansen, Eric wrote:
Does anyone here do or have had done to them a security or systems check for
their Exchange site? Our budget time is approaching and I'd like to budget
to have a guy come in and test our email system for security and possibly go
over the system
No, that strange poetry stuff. Hari-Kiri??
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Bathe?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
We can surely tell that it is Friday, can't we.
I like this much better than
No. I checked and they appear to be an original message without any
forwarding. Also, not using anything but Exchange and Antigen for my email.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
And the Exchange server is the IP address that is resending the message, not
some intermediary system?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
you mock my innermost feelings...my chi...my essence?
May the goddesses have mercy on your soul.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC
I'm available for consulting of this nature. Where is aruplabs located?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: Consultant Security/System Audit??
Does anyone here do or
and what's wrong with all black?
- Original Message -
From: Joyce, Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
This coming from a person who dresses in
Would that be the new and improved STiCK?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
Sure, with this !
I mock nothing, it's.. it's just that some of it is so BAD!
And if you like, I'll mail suggestions for chi enhancing exercises.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
I have upgraded my STiCK 2.0 with the 9 nail add-on. It's much more
efficient now.
S
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Some Problem Someplace, I think
Would that be the
I especially hate the ones that are not 5-7-5 but actually 17 syllable
sentences that are word-wrapped into Haiku format.
S.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question
Salt Lake City, Utah. Its still on the drawing board, I'm just gathering
information.
On that note should I wait to do all this till a 2k migration? Opinions?
What about .net?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:40
Have you lived with Groupshield for two years?
...then shush.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
I mock nothing, it's..
Yes, or even a LART.
Whatever you call it, I'd bet it could seriously FDISK a user...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Some Problem Someplace, I think
Would that be the
Can't say as I have, but I have been a proud member of Uncle Sam's overseas
canoe club for 8 years. I'm sure we are about even.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
I am just as fed up with your canoe club as you are fed up with my
Groupshield kiss my ass Haiku... So that makes us even...
Didn't I divorce you last year? g
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange
Hello all,
We are looking at getting Trend's E-Manager content filter as an add on to
our Scanmail a/v product to start screening out spam. If you have or are
using E-Manager for Scanmail could you let me know if you would recommend
for or against it and if there are any caveats I need to be
Okay,
There are 2 machines.
First machine is a 2000 Server Domain Controller.
Second machine is a 2000 Server with Exchange 2000 on there.
If I reinstall the Operating System on the Second Machine
but give it the same name as before, and I install Exchange
2000 on there once again, what
The nail did get stuck once and I called tech support. They told me it was
an added feature to the product. When the nail gets stuck, the stick
becomes the handle of the human broom you use to mop up the mess, which
answers your first question.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel
Trend on Linux Rocks! The web interface is very sweet and it actually does
what you tell it to do.
I tested Emanager very briefly (1 month) with Exchange. I am sure they will
allow you to test it out for yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Here is the header from one of the messages that the recipient received that
I did not send...
Received: from apsnt4.aps-soft.com ([10.0.0.4]) by apsnt4.aps-soft.com with
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id Z0HVN44G; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 04:59:39 -0500
To:
I have evaluated Trend's E-Manager at one point in time. It works ok, but
not as comprehensive or flexible as MailSweeper. Take a look at Praetor as
well.
Content filtering is a losing battle in my opinion. You will be chasing an
ever so mobile optimum point where you block the most amount
Michael,
Read the Q Articles that Kevin and I sent you. E2K is nested in the AD
structure. Without wiping out your entire AD domain or following the Q
Articles we sent you, you will be SOL.
D
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January
Ok will do.
Thanks for all your help.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: More Exchange Help (this is just not my day...)
Michael,
Read the Q
It doesn't like the email address.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
All Americans are inheritors of a legacy of freedom and religious tolerance.
To those Americans who would lash out at your fellow citizens simply because
they worship
Its an invalid email addy...
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird Error
My boss sent an e-mail to a msn.com account. but this is the error message
he received back. Why would
Because your server tried to send the mail and it failed with user unknown.
MSN thought you'd like to know.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird Error
My boss sent an e-mail to a
But why wouldn't it just send it to MSN, and then have the MSN Sys Admin
send me a message telling me the account doesn't exist.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
It did. And their server replied to your server which then passed back
to the sender as to the results it received.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 14:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Because of the zillions of MSN addresses, they automated it. Also, getting an
automated NDR is RFC compliant.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Give to the world the best you have, and the best will come back to
you. --Madeline S.
That is the MSN sys admin message. They're not people you know, it's all
computers talking to each other.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
But why wouldn't it just
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying
to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case.
Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can
block.
From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Ok, so basically I can just ignore the beginning part, because that is the
original Message ID, and just pay attention to the
3550 (000B09AA) 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:18 PM
To:
Hi folks, hope everyone had a good new year. I need some background to
help troubleshoot a strange problem. Way back when, when we were still
on 5.5, we moved our mailboxes to a new server, and though we had no
problem with any of the boxes or connectivity (thanks Mr. Crowley!) for
some reason
Using Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5 in an NT4 sp6 environment.
Periodically, when you attempt to open a message or access the GAL, the
client machines will hang from about 2-15 seconds or so. Cannot see any
messages in the queue that might be causing this. IS on one server is
about 45GB, but
I understand that, but the response my boss received led him to believe he
received the ndr from our internal server.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
That is the
Emanger Rocks! Using the AOL top ten spammer list can reduce the amount of
SPAM you receive. Filtering on specific works like any other product, it's
what you make of it. Download it and have at it for 30 days free. I run
Emanager, Internet VirusWall and TVCS all on the same box. The reports
m
ndr'd boss...
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
I understand that, but the response my boss received led him to believe he
received the ndr from our
Can a mailbox have a local account instead of a domain account as its
Primary NT account, or permissions?
I want to create a user that is essentially not allowed to do anything but
check email.
exch 5.5 sp4
_
List posting
What about the shake.exe file indicated in the message?
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi folks, hope everyone had a good new year. I need some background to
help troubleshoot a strange problem. Way back when, when we were still on
5.5, we moved our mailboxes to a new server, and though we had no problem
with any of the boxes or connectivity (thanks Mr. Crowley!) for some
reason
Ah... I bet that was an intended by-product of the introduced feature. And
they probably charged extra for this unforeseen functionality as well.
- Original Message -
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:37 PM
Better yet, block all .EXE files.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
What about the shake.exe file indicated in the message?
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M.
I can find no listings for this at Nai, nor can I find any listings in a
Google or Overture search. A hoax possibly?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus ShakerWorld
No.
What you can do is to create an NT account for this user, allow it to only
logon to your OWA servers and have them use OWA to access email. That
pretty much accomplishes what you want.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
It isn't a virus, or at least the original wasn't. It is a computer prank.
It makes your screen shake.
But that isn't to say that there isn't a virus now.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Someone once told me that if there is an SMTP error code in the NDR (such as
the 550 error he received) then it's always the other server sending that
code back. I think that might have been our own beloved Mr. Chenault, IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL
Well, that means the same thing as
The recipient name is not recognized to me, anyway...
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
[Violence] is impractical because it is adescending spiral ending in destruction
for all. --Dr. Martin Luther
You can argue both ways. But for the sake of simplicity, just tell him that
it did come from MSN. If he needs a detailed explanation, then you need to
explain to him the way that mail works. The message goes to your server,
which then attempts to contact the remote server (MSN in this case).
A 2-Carat D flawless would be sufficient down-payment for 1 year of my
automated alt.clueless.boss forum.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
I understand that, but
Neil! thanks! I should have been looking at the deployment guide the whole
time. I'm only on page 8 at the moment but it does talk about the ADC in
the slipstream section. I'm not sure if it's a recommendation, necessarily
but it seems to imply it is an ok thing to do. I'll keep reading and
Amen. The other consideration you should look at is will you filter e-mails
that are really business related, but for whatever reason appear to be spam.
This blocks legitimate mail and could possibly lose you business. Example:
Dear Sirs,
My name is Dick Cheney and I am the President of a 18
Thanks for the breakdown, Ben.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
You can argue both ways. But for the sake of simplicity, just tell him that
it did come from
Exactly what we do - hence I don't have to leap to action on this one. :)
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
You're welcome.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
Thanks for the breakdown, Ben.
-Original
LOL!!! This is definitely a keeper!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?
Amen. The other consideration you should look at is will you
D@am that Dick Cheney!
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Peace hath higher tests of manhood / Than battle ever knew. --John Greenleaf
Whittier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your
self if you do anything else.
-Original Message-
From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Containers
Wanting to gather
Put 'em all in one container. Use other containers to create DL's and CR's.
- Original Message -
From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:49 PM
Subject: Containers
Wanting to gather information.
In a
Do I hear an AMEN!
--
From: Martin Blackstone
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2002 13:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
Better yet, block all .EXE files.
-Original Message-
I'm running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT 4.0 SP6a. I have 3 messages that show up
in the IMS inbound queue awaiting delivery. These are old messages from
November. I'll like to remove these but have not been successful. I tried
following Q193862 and deleted the file queue.dat and that did not fix it.
Goodafternoon All,
I have just been asked by my boss to implement message journaling on our
Exchange 5.5/SP4 box.
Can anyone provide any insight on pro's/con's and/or pitfalls to doing this?
TIA
Ron
_
List posting FAQ:
Hi Does anyone know how to change the port in Exchange Administrator. We
want to change the port from port 25 to port 97.
thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Hi all,
I'm about to configure front-end servers for SMTP, but heard some
pretty distressing news about that today. I heard that inetinfo
will crash if the servers have any information stores of them,
but since the stores generate delivery status msgs, you can't have
the FE's as SMTP Gateways
I just confirmed with OAR.NET. I saw the SHAKE.EXE reference but wasn't
clear if that was the attachment name. We're already blocking EXE's so we
seem to be safe. Better safe than sorry!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:31
I dunno, but you certainly won't hear Elves bowling...
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
The legislature's job is to write law. It's the executive branch's job to
interpret law. George W. Bush, Austin, Texas, Nov. 22, 2000
If your business requires you to do it, then you really don't have a choice.
However if it's something that your boss thinks would be cool then you
need to weigh your options.
Basically, when you turn on journaling in Exchange 5.5, it forces all emails
to go through the MTA, even the ones
This, along with your last question about scanning e-mail, leads me to
believe that your boss is an e-mail Nazi. He wants to know what everyone is
sending and receiving to anyone. Refer him to Ed Crowley's statement, There
are seldom good technical solutions for behavioral problems.
It's very difficult to move individuals between containers. Unless you have
the power to keep people from changing jobs, use one contain for people,
others for resources and whatnot.
--
be - MOS
Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be first
overcome.
Please think for a minute about consequences of this action. Port 25 is
designated for SMTP traffic. If you try and change it to something else,
you screw yourself basically. Unless of course, you are trying to change
something else. Of course, we wouldn't know that because you didn't provide
The queue Inbound messages awaiting delivery are messages that have
already been read from the file system, converted and placed in the store.
Deleting queue.dat won't help a bit. If the delete button in the UI doens't
work you'll need to use mdbvu32.exe to delete them There is an article on
Same container. Remember, you cant move accounts between containers, and org
levels change daily.
-Original Message-
From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Containers
Wanting to gather
The Q article said to delete queue.dat so whoever wrote it doesn't know what
they were doing. I thought I may have to use mdbvu32.exe but have never used
it before. I'm moving everything to Exchange 2000 soon so maybe I'll just
leave them out there for now.
Thanks,
Jeff
-Original
I have a form that I made some time ago. It had been working fine for
some time and now when someone fills out the form and clicks send it
goes to there drafts folder. I found that in the options for the email
the option Do not deliver before: was checked with a date in the box.
This had
Hence my last question as to the amount of time spent pulling the good mail
out of the filtered mail. I am already aware of many of the pitfalls of
content filtering. Anything I didn't already know I learned through an
experiment with the Outlook rules which resulted in noticible amounts of my
I agree 100% with the second paragraph and 99% with the third.
That 1% comes because we are a communications company and have no choice but
to plaster many of our email addresses on TV screens or bylines on magazine
articles, newspaper stories, and so on. We're having a big conference call
Then I would tell my managers that the amount of time it would take would be
zero. I'm not qualified to decide what is and is not business related.
Although if you want to send what ever you consider porn to me, I'll let you
know what I think. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni
We are using Mail Marshall and the reason port 25 needs to be change is
because Mail Marshall uses this port(97) for mail and sends mail to
Exchange Server, instead of Exchange recieving it first. Mail Marshall is
acting like a mail security gateway for Exchange.
I look forward to those who are sending you mail to connect to a port other
than the RFC standard port 25 then. Or are you saying mail will still be
received on port 25 to the Mail Marshall server and then forwarded off of
port 97 to the Exchange server?
D
-Original Message-
From:
MailMarshall doesn't include instructions on how to make the change? I'm
disappointed.
Anyway... There is no way to change it in the Exchange 5.5 admin, it is
controlled by the services file in the \%system root%\drivers\etc directory.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
Well the straight stuff, be careful in here.
On your exchange server go to the winnt\system32\drivers\etc folder.
Edit the services file you will find here.
Find the line for SMTP and change the port designation.
Remember to stop and restart the IMC/IMS
Done
-Original Message-
From:
He wants it to go:
Internet--(25)Mailmarshall(97)-(97)IMS
However what I would do it setup MM on another machine, then configure DNS
with MX records of
10 MailMarshal
20 Exchange
Then have MM forward mail to the Exhc server
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL
Well, the poor Marshall hasn't been the same since Miss Kitty left town.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: changing port
MailMarshall doesn't include instructions on how to
Actually a quick search found this:
---
In MS Exchange's case you edit the TCP/IP services file
(%SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\services). You will need to change the
default TCP port number for SMTP to another free port number (e.g. port 97
is often available).
---
On the MailMarshal
Q165505
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Petschow, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: messages in inbound queue
The Q article said to delete queue.dat so whoever wrote it doesn't know
what
they were
Technet is a wonderful thing. Try it sometime. exchange SMTP port
change yields Q173903
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: changing port
We are using Mail
It's also in Appendix A of the 4.2-Version Manual very nicely described...
...in the morning open your eyes not only for shaving...;-)
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Januar 2002 22:54
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff:
Thanks for the Q, Mike. I will give it a try. Looks like it is what I need.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Hoople [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: messages in inbound queue
Q165505
Mike
- Original
So has anyone actually seen this puppy in the wild? NAI states Low Risk.
Curious...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert
B.
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99291
looking for that engagement ring she can't say NO to?
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
A 2-Carat D flawless would be sufficient down-payment for 1 year of my
101 - 200 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
