Rule of thumb 1 - restores always take at least twice as long as backups.
Rule of thumb 2 - backups never go wrong, restores always do.
Rule of thumb 3 - Rules of thumb are usually optimistic.
David
-Original Message-
From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December 2001
We generally allocated 4k per user in a remote office over a direct WAN
link.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:14
Title: Mailbox quota issue
Hy,
i´ve just created a new mailbox for a user and imported a .pst (content from his old mailbox). Since he is exeeding the default quota i have set i unticked the setting for his mailbox in Xadmin. Nevertheless he still is prompted with the message that he is
Groupshield is the borg
Resistance is futile now
Uninstall wont work
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
Sybari will reign
In my environment soon
Groupshield, kiss my
Hi, Jen :)
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|+---
|| Jennifer Baker
Here you go...
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Client\Options]
DumpsterAlwaysOn=dword:0001
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/6/30.ASP
D
The road to a friend's house is never long. -Danish proverb
-Original Message-
From:
Backup Exec Stopped
Servers Been up 12 Weeks Now
Really need reboot
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Groupshield is the
There are some users in my company who utilize a program that enables the
user to place multiple recipients in Outlook (as many as 4-5000). Aside
from the fact that I hate the application, user's don't realize the
ramifications that it can have, not to mention, the nastygrams that we've
received
search TechNet for dumpsteralwayson
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December 2001 15:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering Deleted
Is this it?
Q178630
__
Greg Monahon
Rational Software Corporation
IT Corporate Postmaster
v. 781.676.2435
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w. http://terp.rational.com/email
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21,
Dumpsteralwayson
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recovering Deleted Items
I recently rebuilt my PC and I had a utility (or registry fix, or
something) that enabled me to
I think they called that ILOVEYOU
I would find out the name of the program and put something in the logon
script to delete it, or the AV software to treat it as a virus.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:35 AM
To:
I always said if I was a rock star I would do an album called Blackstone
Live from Stonehenge.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Solstice is here now
Wine and song
Title: AW: Mailbox quota issue
I reopened outlook several times. Even a new mailprofile (on my box) didn´t fix this. But deleting/recreating his mailbox on the server did fix it. I still don´t know what caused it, but i hadn´t the time to find out.
Thanks Lori.
-Ursprüngliche
We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange
v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6
with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool
to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks
Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self
explanatory.
( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move
Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant
Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do!
D
A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned
into a pile of dust.
-Original Message-
From: steven parks
Steven, I just heard the air leave the room as Martin's comment flew
over your head.
-Original Message-
From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Look at the context of the
Duh. It's not appreciated here Steven and Keith, that's what we were trying
to tell you without tons of flames. However your ability to detect blinding
sarcasm when you see it is indeed broken.
-Original Message-
From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21,
Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS
Exchange Move Server Wizard?
I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the
sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom.
Thanks and Merry Christmas to all.
As do I.
I would like to remind everyone that we make a pretty good living off of all
these products that Microsoft supplies. Thanks to them I can put food on the
table and roof over my families head.
You will not be receiving AB Approval either.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
I always recreate mailboxes when something doesnt work...
and just the other day the PDC was frozen up, reformatted and reinstalled
naturally...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
It's not his fault folks. After all he works for $tinson, Mag, Fizzell - a
law firm. And we all know that law firms give away their services. They are
a pure Pro Bono firm correct?
-Original Message-
From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM
AWWW, did I hurt someone's feelings, what a shame. What in the world is
AB approval?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
As do I.
I would
No, you didn't hurt anyone's feelings, but you DID lessen your chances or
receiving any kind of valuable assistance in the future.
D
Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can
survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From:
Well since you kind of apologized.
We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the
bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process.
[1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module
-Original Message-
From: Keith Beahm
I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest
store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape,
move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep
single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully
supported, which is more
I think the secret cabal meeting should be moved up to tonight so that this
thread can be discussed...
Never mind, there is no secret cabal. Please disregard.
Barry - MOS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Friday, December
snickering
Wha? Where? Who?
Oh, nevermind...
D
The hardest thing in life is to know which bridge to cross and which to
burn. -David Russell
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I am having a problem with Exchange 2k SP 2 and OWA. Occasionally when I reply to a
message the recipient receives gobbly goop, which looks like it is encrytped or UTF-8.
I am using OWA over SSL.
This only happens with OWA and usually only when I reply.
Example:
i 0 z+Ð$Í
O so glad to see this. I ahm having the exact same issue. Except I have
users using both OLK 98 2K.
Is the issue resolved when a user connects on a unclick mail item in
Outlook?
Does hitting Send/Receive numerous times have no effect?
Is this the case for both outbound and inbound mail?
I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25.
Should any SMTP server respond to each command?
I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]'
and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah..
Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]'
and it sits there and acts stupid... no
All issued commands must yield a response.
- Original Message -
From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM
Subject: SMTP Testing
I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25.
Should
Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have
been email problems between us and another agency.
Thanks
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM
To:
sorry .. i have been absent ;-)
of course ...u need
www.e-nspect.co.uk
now i feel better ;-)
g
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:13 AM
Subject: Monitoring email
I need to
Brothers and sisters,
I still have the same problem after i tried is/ds adjustment.
To remember:
the sender of calender meeting recieves ndr voor the recipient and also
in some cases some messages.
When i study ndr messege i notice that the recipient which is mentioned
is the old (in most cases
Now I'm totally confused...
I tried telnet'ing from outside to our SMTP server(on port 25) and I got a
connection refused. I thought if this was the case you could not receive
email from outside??? Am I wrong? I just sent an email from outside and it
came right through.
I can telnet from to our
Non-authoritative answer:
netdoor.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = pike.netdoor.com
netdoor.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = rock.netdoor.com
I was able to coonect to pike.netdoor.com but not rock.netdoor.com on port
25.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson
If the server side (the domain to which you are sending, your machine is
considered a client in this context) does not respond with something (it
MUST respond) the client will timeout and close the connection, putting the
mail in a retry state.
- Original Message -
From: Barry Patterson
Well that's not the server here...
That's my outside account.
We are mail.mssc.state.ms.us
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Testing
Title: RE: Mailbox quot a proble m
I don t think it s that drastic since i created the mailbox just 1 h before.
All i did is delete, recreate and reimport the .pst from his old mailbox.
btw. i did reboot the workstation and i did test the mailbox on another
workstation. Nevertheless i didn
I am sure there is a tool in the bork that fixes this, and it might be the
one known as clean sweep, but look up what's in there and look at the help
files.
I'm also sure that it's in the archives, but those are known to be less than
reliable.
-Original Message-
From: Kiran, Murat
Thanks everyone. I appreciate it.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange
We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier
with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the
Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if
they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with
Thanks! I'm psyched! I can stop the spammers of my company
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
I would stay with Scanmail. Why dump something that works perfect
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I
We use the Tumbleweed MMS here. I have to admit I miss Antigen, but
Tumbleweed seems up to the anti-virus task.
And it allows you to add really neat disclaimers to all your emails...
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:26
LOL. Even when you don't want them? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
We use the Tumbleweed MMS here. I have to admit I miss
I would not dump scanmail...maybe I could leave Trend on the internet
gateway and run Tumbleweed internally in order to have dual coverage. just
an idea.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Exchange
Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another domain
i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want
mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I
dont want to put each user
Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another domain
i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want
mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have
potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I dont
want to put each user
Gentlemen,
This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one
method.
It depends on what you want to achieve.
And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though)
My pennies worth
Merry Xmas
smcgilligan
-Original Message-
From: Alex Seigler
Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another
domain,
i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want
mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have
potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I dont
want to put each user
I have an Exchange 2000 box sp2 that is having an OWA access problem.
All IE clients 5.0 and up (which use Kerberos Authentication) do not get
full access to mail folders. When one of these clients connects, two
messages pop up stating (an internal server error has occurred). No
items in the
Exmerge is on the W2K CD??? Off to go check that out...
D
There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but only one view. -Harry
Millner
-Original Message-
From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Thanks to all for the great suggestions. I'm pushing the idea of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can receive SMTP e-mails from the inside
world. As it happens the sending program on the AS/400 simply connects to
port 25 on the Exchange box so there is no need for MX records, we just told
IMS that
I meant to say the Exchange CD rom under support\utils
It will baulk about dlls but just add a path statement pointing to your
exchsrvr\bin directory
Minor faux paus
smcgilligan
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 21 2001 3:51 PM
To: Exchange
I have a public folder with an SMTP address. I currently have the Default
user permissions set to None, but with that setting I can't receive SMTP
mail. If I give Default create rights I'm fine, but is there a user I can
add that would only allow the IMS to create messages in there?
-Walden
Ahhh... I thought that might be the case. ;o)
D
I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan
Hale
-Original Message-
From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M$ Exchange
After I hit send I came up with the solution. On the IMS there is a delivery
restriction tab, if I add the users that aren't allowed to send outbound
e-mail to the tab (or add a DL to the tab and the users to the DL) my
problem is solved.
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
D'OH! My bad. I don't think it was this way a year or so ago... we have to
go through the state's main network center. But, before we could telnet to
our mail server from outside. Now they appear to have reconfigured things so
that our MX record points to their gateway... and then they forward to
Our Exchange Server and Web Server are on different machines which we
believe is causing our problem. We are trying to access public folder
data on the Exchange Server and can't find a way that is acceptable.
ExOLEDB can only be used on a single-server system. So when we try to use
Set
Alex,
I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume
you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT
supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you
guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer
Of course, you must understand that most of us realize that the SIS is broke
when exmerge is run, but not supported by MS??? Doubt it...
D
A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if
you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no
guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in
\support\utils\readme.doc.
Thanks,
aseigler
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product
Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various
revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!.
As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a
mainstream product and in this case I think this has been
What is the easiest way to obtain exoledb.dll to register it on the web server? Do
you know if we can pull it from the exchange server and then register it on the web
server?
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:49 PM
To:
Certainly everyone is entitled to their viewpoint. I was simply stating
the fact that from my experience, I prefer Move Server over ExMerge,
then I listed a few reasons, one of them being that Move Server is fully
supported, while ExMerge is not. To some customers, that reason alone
is enough
Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a
possibility. Then again, wouldn't ISScan have the same potential impact?
We (the general we) run these utilities occasionally for virus outbreaks,
etc... These are the supported methods to ripping stuff out of the IS
I'm curious as to which part of MS you work in... The Exchange team? PSS?
MCS?
D
Press any key to continue or any other key to quit...
-Original Message-
From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M$
Publisher
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
I'm curious as to which part of MS you work in... The Exchange team? PSS?
MCS?
D
Press any key to
Hi Everyone,
Thanks in advance for your help. I have recently added an exch 2000 server to a 5.5
site, moved over all the folders and mailboxes, removed the 5.5 server (according to
technet) and cut over to Exchange 2000 Native mode. I am still having three problems,
that have been with me
Ok, let me ellaborate on this a little bit.
I work in PSS, in a group close to the group that the individual who
originially wrote ExMerge worked in. That individual maintained the
ExMerge code for several years. That individual has now moved to MCS,
and is no longer maintaining that code.
um... actually, I've been doing a lot of work with the BORK and the tools, and
many of them aren't supported fully.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Remember the story of the guy on the beach surrounded by dying starfish that
were
No. You have to give anonymous the permission.
- Original Message -
From: Walden H. Leverich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail
I have a public
Yes, Alex works for my erstwhile employer. ;)
Exmerge was written by a PSS employee (a personal friend of mine here in
TX). Utilities written like that, instead of out of Dev, are not expressly
supported by MS. They are classed as BORK utilites; best-effort support.
- Original Message -
Understandable...
I perform migrations both ways, it really depends on the scenario involved,
but I see where you're going with this.
D
A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks
that others throw at him. -David Brink
-Original Message-
From: Alex
Actually, if I give Default the 'create' right all is good, I've tried it.
(EX5.5) But I'm wondering if I can give the specific IMS user (if one
exists) the right.
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516)627-3800 x11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
We are in the process of planning a migration and have looked at Move Server
Wizard and would definitely choose it over Exmerge. Not just for Single
instance storage but also to maintain the links between calendars for
meetings. People hate it when after the move, cancelled meetings are not
Nevermind...we figured out a way around it...FINALLY! Have a great weekend!
-Original Message-
From: Lisa Horton
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO
What is the easiest way to obtain exoledb.dll
Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express
and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access
Exchange 2000 through the firewall?
_
List posting FAQ:
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993).
And is WebMeister your real name? ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
WebMeister MeisterBurger
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If using
m
Portobello Mushrooms...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If
Hi
I have a problem: Scanmail strips all infected attachments but the
users' outlook still crashes when they have the preview pane open. This
is costing a lot of time and effort to fix. I sthere any way around it?
Kim
_
List
I have been trying to post a message the has Out o' Off. Asst. in
the body and it doesn't get posted. Is there a way to turn this on for
Eudora pop clients? This is a setting at the mailbox level is it not?
Could you not use an ADSI editor to flip a switch or something? This is
for Exchange
Of course, alternate recipient won't catch outbound mail. Message
journaling would catch everything.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
What's a return message?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Do the Eurpoe users have a different address space and is the Lotes
connector configured to properly route to it?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
There is one Global Address List. Users either have permission to see it or
not.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith, Calvin C
Sent:
Whre are the .DAT files?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:02 AM
To:
Why, is he cooking spaghetti?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Exchange
The answer is simple: It is by design.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phillip Yan
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:56 PM
To: Exchange
Exchange 2000's security model doesn't really support what you're trying to
do. That calls for two sites, if separating of administrative permissions
is important enough to you to negate the other effects of separate sites.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from
All mail for all addresses domain1, or just selected users?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carl
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:13 AM
To:
Your alternatives presume that it is the link speed itself that is causing
your slowness. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion, or else you might find
yourself going to the boss and requesting funds for an improvement that
doesn't improve anything.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
This has been asked and many times, though relatively infrequently. The
answer is your mileage will vary, and greatly.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I asked you some of this earlier and you didn't reply.
1. Do you have any international languages installed and/or configured on the OWA
server?
2. Do you have any international languages installed and/or configured on your client
browser?
3. Do you have a front-end/back-end configuration?
Forget Send/Receive; it doesn't do anything in MAPI.
Your router, proxy, or something like that is blocking the UDP packets.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
All clients, or just ones on slow links? Do you get Error on page in the
lower left-hand corner of the browser some or all of the time? Are you
using SSL? Are your browsers configured to not cache encrypted pages?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
