On the Office 2000 CD there is a separate installer for only Outlook on
the root of the CD.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Why is it a problem that your users are running Outlook 97? As long as it is
8.2.3.5228[1] or later it's Y2K compliant...
[1] IIRC
On 3/18/03 9:15, Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My company is currently running Exchange 5.5. Problem is, most of my clients
are running Outlook 97. I
There is?
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
On the Office 2000 CD there is a separate installer for only Outlook on
the root of the CD.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Yea, the Custom button when you run setup. g
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5
There is?
-Original Message-
From
, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5
Yea, the Custom button when you run
For that matter make an Administrative Install then use the ORK to fully
customize your deployment.
From: Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5
Date: Tue, 18 Mar
In the 11/99 Technet package there was a Service Packs CD which was an
Outlook 2000 install CD for Exchange 5.5 if that helps any.
Ronni
-Original Message-
From: Mike Strock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook
Check the properties on the file - make sure it isn't set as read only
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and .PST problem
I actually ran scanpst on it and nothing
Are you transferring and opening on the same workstation? Sounds like a
locked file.
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 and .PST problem
All,
I am having a problem
Run Scanpst on it a couple of times and see what happens.
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
All,
I am having a problem with a user's PST file here in the office. He got a
new PC and we
Try scanpst.exe utility and run on the pst file
also see if the pst is beyond 2gb if it is u need one more utility
if u are coming the pst from cdrom remove the read only attribute
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:48 PM
To:
if there's any
change but from the looks of things everything seems to be in order.
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Cooke, Brian
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and .PST problem
Try scanpst.exe
also check the hard disk with chkdsk /f
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and .PST problem
I actually ran scanpst on it and nothing really seems to be happening
Corrupted form cache? Look for and delete frmcache.dat on the client. Then
try again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:03 AM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: Outlook 2000
I a
If I delete it will it regenerate??
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000
Corrupted form cache? Look for and delete frmcache.dat on the client. Then
try again
Its alive!
- Original Message -
From: David McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000
If I delete it will it regenerate??
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:02 AM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000
If I delete it will it regenerate??
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
1. Recreate Outlook Profile?
2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc...
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Don't find
Is he sure he has an Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box
1. Recreate Outlook Profile?
2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail
Heck, Im not sure I have one.
- Original Message -
From: Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Is he sure he has an Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From
Yabbut. You can use Martin's.
;)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Heck, Im not sure I have one.
- Original Message -
From: Candee Vaglica
others after SP1 install . I'll post the
results to this list once I have them all.
Kishore Gagrani
-Original Message-
From: Davy Rowland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN
I have seen weird behavior on Win98/Outlook 2000 clients where they would not connect
to Exchange server unless DNS was configured correctly on those Win98 machines.
-Original Message-
From: Guy Swartwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:18 AM
To: Exchange
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
I have seen weird behavior on Win98/Outlook 2000 clients where they would
not connect to Exchange server unless DNS was configured correctly on those
Win98 machines.
-Original Message-
From: Guy Swartwood
Are you talking a DNS or WINS problem?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
You have name resolution issues (all of your users have
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
Are you talking a DNS or WINS problem?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000
You have name resolution issues (all of your users have a problem if they
have to hit retry).
-Original Message-
From: Guy Swartwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
29, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---s lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09
Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured for
tools . options . preferences . email options . advanced email options
same as 98 and 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
Tools/Options/E-Mail Options/Advanced E-Mail Options.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked in Tools/Options/Email Options/Advanced
Email Options ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
In 2002 it is.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is Automatic
: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook
Isnt that option avail in 2000 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
In 2002
]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---s lightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked in Tools/Options/Email
Options/Advanced Email Options ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelley
No, Special K is for executives. The rest of us prefer automation as it
leads to relaxation. [1]
[1] Apologies to ASB.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000
Not that option - the 'automatic name checking' option...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
, August 29, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
As much as I have appreciated everybody's responses all the solutions
offered do not solve the problem I am faced with.
Suggestion: CNTRL-K - this does
:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail
addressresolution---sl ightly off topic
However a message must have already been sent to the user previously,
if
that is the case
then when I'm typing I the name outlook will autofill and complete
the
address.
Yes
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 custom Contact form question ...
I wish to add a button on a custom Contact form in Outlook
, July 31, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000/Exchange 2000 performance problems.
I guess I stumped the experts.
I still am very concerned about the fact that a 'new' mail sent as plain
text gets mysteriously converted to HTML - anyone experience that?
Don Couch
Pacific
I guess I stumped the experts.
I still am very concerned about the fact that a 'new' mail sent as plain text gets
mysteriously converted to HTML - anyone
experience that?
Don Couch
Pacific Disaster Center
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
I'm not stumped, just amused.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000/Exchange 2000 performance problems.
I guess I stumped the experts.
I still am very
You can open up OLE objects in Outlook 2000 SP2. It will prevent people
from programtically sending out email.
BUT - you can always use Outlook Redemption which is way sexy!
This is a set or programmatic objects that mimic the function of most
Outlook methods so you can send out email even if
Export his contacts to a CSV file then import the data you need into a
spam auto sender program.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
I used to do this myself, but not with that man contacts.
Word of warning, you cannot put drop the contacts into a new container for a mailing
list. Also, I only had around 300 ppl in a list that corrupted constantly. I
continually had to rebuild (by hand) the mailing list. Eventually I
I've been trying but I cannot connect.
The greyed out reply buttons - is this when the message is displayed in
the previerw pane or when the message is opened up in its own window?
Is it possibly a custom form? - Q221954/Q208346
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911
it is outlook 2000 and it is an liscensed copy
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
prior to the start of this problem?
Also, please quit snipping the thread when you're replying.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000
I've been trying but I
Also, does it happen if that person logs in to a different PC?
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000
Thomas,
You haven't answered Erik's question about custom forms. I
Q198083
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors
Hi folks,
Have a workstation (Dell) that the hard drive failed.
Or simply make sure you have a temporary internet folder in your profile.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce
Sent: 21 March 2002 16:03
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments
: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install,
anderro rs
Q198083
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all attachments, a fresh install, and errors
Hi
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 15:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all
Either delegate permissions in Outlook or grant the user send as and receive
as permissions on the mailbox depending on the need.
As to sending, open a new mail message... Choose View | From and populate it
with the name of the other mailbox PRN.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000
Either delegate permissions in Outlook or grant the user send as and receive
as permissions on the mailbox depending on the need.
As to sending, open a new mail message... Choose View | From
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook 2000
Either delegate permissions in Outlook or grant the user send as and receive
as permissions on the mailbox
RPC binding order? What protocols are installed on the box? Anything
interesting in the NIC tests?
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 slow and consumes 100% cpu
Defragment? FDISK?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alverson,
Thomas M.
Sent: Tuesday, February 19,
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 slow and consumes 100% cpu when starting and
opening messages
Defragment? FDISK?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
What kind of an error does it cause?
The following group is a very good one for outlook development issues.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/outlook-dev/
S.
-Original Message-
From: Robyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Robyn, I hope someone on this list can help you. But really, this is an
Outlook question you'll probably have much better luck posting your
question to microsoft.public.outlook.program_vba or
microsoft.public.outlook.program_forms. And while you're waiting for
one of those Outlook whiz-kids to
: Outlook 2000 Rules?
Subscribe a public folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond
Witherspoon
Sent: Monday
Its just as easy to base the rule upon who it is sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
Thats the reason most other lists prefix
:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
Thats the reason most other lists prefix the subject with the
list name.
For example:
[ExchangeDiscussion] Subject
So people can create rules to move it to folders when they
arrive. This
is one of the few lists I
Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 7:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
Because its obnoxious to add that, as it breaks thread sorting
capabilities
of some
This list and the
Outlook-Dev list are the only ones out of the 30 or so I
subscribe to that don't prefix the subjects.
Apparently the other 28 or so pander to the LCD.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
This list and the
Outlook-Dev list are the only ones out of the 30 or so I
subscribe to that don't prefix the subjects.
Apparently the other 28 or so pander to the LCD.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
Lowest
Common
Denominator
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/01 7:32 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
LCD?
What TLA is that a TLA for?
Mike Carlson
http://www.domitianx.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Master Of The Spoon People
://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
I have no idea what you are talking about in regards to subscribe a
public folder and set NOMAIL?
So I
://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
I have no idea what you are talking about in regards to subscribe a
public folder and set NOMAIL
, not in parenthesis)
[3] Hi Sherry
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
You've got it exactly right.
Subscribe a public folder to the list, with its subscription set
Checked the FAQ?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 print problem with HTML images
I have not found any 5.5 IE's to try it on. Every machine I have tried has
IE6 and has failed in the same way. This one is very easy to repro - just
make
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 print problem with HTML images
Well of course the way to solve this is to only insert bitmaps of X's into
all of your Word docs
AFAIK, the issue is that Outlook 2k has a different MAPI version than E2k
(and most Ex5.5 versions too) and that can cause major issues.
I don't recall seeing any change to that recommendations.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
Dear Tony,
Back on Thursday, April 12, 2001, I wrote a Haiku memorializing
Windows Messaging.
Windows Messaging,
more than a utility,
powerful, simple.
Able to resolve,
Administrator's best friend,
Never forgotten!!
For those who need more, there is the following Q Article.
No its within outlooks page setup options
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000
I have a user who has Outlook 2000 on a Windows 2000 Professional PC. When
she
I played with it when it first came out. It was neat and all but I didn't
think it was worth the effort since it can only be accessed via Outlook. I
would rather do something using the SharePoint Server.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Yes.
Can you be more specific in your problems? Have you checked at
slipstick.com, I think she has more information there.
-Original Message-
Has anyone ever gotten this to work successfully? If so, would you be
willing to pass the knowledge on? I have not been able to find a
Have you looked at www.slipstick.com ?
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for
Personal, that means you're responsible
You should ask this at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/outlook-dev. This is an
Outlook Developers group.
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 Custom Views in Public Folders
We are
Well of course the way to solve this is to only insert bitmaps of X's into
all of your Word docs, that way it always prints as expected! ;)
I will have to test this myself another day, but it does say that 5.5 Sp2
corrects this issue. Got any 5.5 installs that you can service pack to check
it
how is Outlook connecting ? to a pop3 or Exchange ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 13:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs on exit
We recently upgraded our Office installation
Are these boxes synching the mail for offline use?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:50 PM
Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs on exit
We recently upgraded our Office installation from 98 to 2K.
None of workstations had any sync settings within their profiles. I did
discover though that a few of the machines were set to access both
internet email and mail from the Exchange Server on our network.
Apparantly before I began working for this company, they used to have
their email hosted,
Applied latest service packs?
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 hangs on exit
We recently upgraded our Office installation from 98 to 2K. The only
issue we appear to have and
Does this only happen for this 1 user?
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:46 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5 attachment problem
Subject:Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5 attachment problem
Does this only happen for this 1 user?
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:46 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5 attachment problem
Yes. No-one else has complained and I am able to send attachments over
remote mail. I was assuming it is client side but as yes I cannot find why
it happens.
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5 attachment problem
I agree with client side but it wouldn't hurt to check exchange mailbox
settings for the user to ensure they match other users that do work.
- Original Message -
From: Olds, Dominic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000/Exch 5.5 attachment problem
I have compared settings with my
Yes. Windows 98 VPN stuff can be flaky. Use Windows 2000.
And, because you posted this to an EXCHANGE list...
Duh.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I have run into the same problem. But I have it working now. It seems to
work only when I set my home PC workgroup = domain name at the office, set
quick logon to the office domain name, and login in to my WIN98Me home PC
with the same username/password as my office username/password.
Good luck!
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 losing a email as it being created
We had a problem a little while ago that we were unable to send any e-mails
with a graphic or an attachment in it. If the message is open for editing
long enough Outlook will try to save a copy to the Drafts folder until
We had a problem a little while ago that we were unable to send any e-mails
with a graphic or an attachment in it. If the message is open for editing
long enough Outlook will try to save a copy to the Drafts folder until you
send it and the Outlook would give back an error when it done that as
Its not the Show Address First thingy you want to change , its the When
sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order
thingy you want to change.
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Dan
Further down the Services/Addressing dialog there is an option to specify
which address list to use for checking names against. You could try adding
the users contacts list and local recipients list in there and move them up
in the search order.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson,
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
