--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 8/13/04 7:47 AM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-There's no sense of original purity of which we partake,
there's just a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One apparently cannot determine the state of consciousness of
another from their actions; probably given the observer/observed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful, though I have to
say
now that I don't know what all the fuss is about, particularly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 4:39 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Good question! I would say offhand that the double cone is actually
the central core of a torus (the Hiranyagarbha-field), which in turn
is one of the countless
misunderstood his definition,or I heard a rather more
elegant retelling than the original if you are correct.
- Original Message -
From: jim_flanegin
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 11:54 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, you can experience Unity, but you cannot experience
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2004, at 6:39 PM, Llundrub wrote:
Perhaps we could say Unity ripens the intimate identity between
perceiver and the perceived, while allowing the essential I-thou
relationship to remain relatively intact at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2004, at 6:39 PM, Llundrub wrote:
Perhaps we could say Unity ripens the intimate identity between
perceiver and the perceived,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a copy of you reading this article? A person who is not
you but who lives on a planet called Earth, with misty mountains,
fertile fields and sprawling cities, in a solar system with eight
other planets? The life
On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:08 AM, sparaig wrote:
Should read the Scientific American online articles about
multiverses.The first level multiverse is described below. There are 4
theoretical levels:
I'll check that out, thanks!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY talks about being one with the immediate objectof perception for
Unity while with growth towards Brahman, there is perception of
being
one with secondary, tertiary, etc., objects...
Can a human *grow* into Brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful, though I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me that Brahman Consciousness, more than any other state is
process as opposed to attainment.
YES
Beautifully put, Sparaig, many thanks :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This goes back to MMY's claim that a sign of Unity is being able to
do any and all of the TM-Sidhis at will (outside of Sidhis
practice).
The times the sidhis have really impressed me were outside of Sidhis
practice,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would say offhand that the double cone is actually
the central core of a torus (the Hiranyagarbha-field), which in
turn
is one of the countless Krishna-bubbles or Universes, and so
on...:-)
The play of the three
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would say offhand that the double cone is actually
the central core of a torus (the Hiranyagarbha-field), which in
turn
is one of the countless Krishna-bubbles or Universes, and so
on...:-)
The play of the three
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY talks about being one with the immediate objectof perception
for
Unity while with growth towards Brahman, there is perception of
being
Interesting note also about the Krishna bubble
universes. Once in 1981? as I was walking up the road, away from the
TMO-Kansas City Capital building, it was early dawn on a Sunday I think, and
I saw Krishna with his flute in a subtle sight vision. I ascribed it at
the time to too many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting note also about the Krishna bubble universes. Once in
1981? as I was walking up the road, away from the TMO-Kansas City
Capital building, it was early dawn on a Sunday I think, and I saw
Krishna with his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More likely he read last night's theory-fest on
Brahman Consciousness, while I skipped it.
No offense, but it just didn't seem to be very
practical or useful to me. These days I'm into
everyday Buddhas and how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting note also about the Krishna bubble universes. Once in
1981? as I was walking up the road, away from the TMO-Kansas City
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimological Aspects -
Which is Maharishi?
In dvaita religions good is seen battling evil and one must
close ranks and act upon the directions of the goodly master
Seems like a mixture of both to me. He's not bound by codes
of conduct, although he's very rigid regarding the purity of
the teaching. He works for the betterment of the world, but it could be
argued that his efforts are not entirely selfless.
My belief is that he's very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Seems like a mixture of both to me. He's not bound by codes
of conduct, although he's very rigid regarding the purity of
the teaching. He works for the betterment of the world, but it
could be argued that his
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
My belief is that he's very dualistic.
Gotta agree with Llundrub on this one. There's
always
someone to blame for either the state of the world
or for some failed plan. And it's never him.
That's just the hat he's wearing for
My belief is that he's very dualistic.
Gotta agree with Llundrub on this one. There's always
someone to blame for either the state of the world
or for some failed plan. And it's never him.
That's just the hat he's wearing for the party.
The party's been going on for 40 years
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My belief is that he's very dualistic.
Gotta agree with Llundrub on this one. There's
always
someone to blame for either the state of the
world
or for some failed plan. And it's never him.
That's just the hat he's wearing
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimological Aspects - Which is Maharishi?
on 8/13/04 7:47 AM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-There's no sense of original purity of which we partake, there's just a -we must purify the world- approach. That's not very advaita
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 8/13/04 7:47 AM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-There's no sense of original purity of which we partake,
there's just a
-we must purify the world- approach. That's not very advaita.
Moreover,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One apparently cannot determine the state of consciousness of
another from their actions; probably given the observer/observed
uncertainty one can never adequately determine the state of
consciousness of another, if
--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One apparently cannot determine the state of
consciousness of
another from their actions; probably given the
observer/observed
uncertainty one can never adequately
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have apparently confused myself on this
distinction. It appears
that in Unity we see everything in terms of
ourselves, and in
Brahman, there is fundamentally no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So I have apparently confused myself on this distinction. It
appears
that in Unity we see everything in terms of ourselves, and in
Brahman, there is fundamentally no 'our self'. Or alternatively,
there is one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One apparently cannot determine the state of
consciousness of
another from their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have apparently confused myself on this
distinction. It appears
that in Unity we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip In Brahman, the double-cone of consciousness has realized
itself alone, and that all the beloved states of consciousness are
merely conic sections of itself: point (sleep), line (dream), plane
(waking),
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip so that Brahman is neither absolute nor relative, nor
both together, nor neither, and so on. There can be perception of
(or via) Unity,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There *does* appear to be a subtle duality present in UC
(despite the name)
because it is experienced as a distinct SoC. Whereas in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip so that Brahman is neither absolute nor relative, nor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip In Brahman, the double-cone of consciousness has realized
itself alone, and that all the beloved states of consciousness are
merely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The point is a horizontal plane through the center; the line is a
diagonal plane through the center tangential to one edge; the X is
the vertical cross-section. The higher states or planes
intersect
the cone
That's just the hat he's wearing for the party.-Peter
Do you know who is throwing the
party?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The point is a horizontal plane through the center; the line is
a
diagonal plane through the center tangential to one edge; the X
is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful, though I have to
say
now that I don't know what all the fuss is about, particularly
visualizing these higher states. In all honesty, they look
almost
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful, though I have
to
say
now that I don't know what all the fuss is about,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL
snip
Kind of makes me wish I had gone to MIU; this
analogy just came to
me a few years ago when I was thinking about the
relationship
between Brahman and the classic seven states of
consciousness :-)
Akasha, you would have been right at home with all the
philosophy majors. It was
On Aug 13, 2005, at 4:31 PM, akasha_108 wrote:
Einstein and other relativity theorists, used a similar double cone to
explain the time/space continuum and called the negative space
Elsewhere. As most MIU core course students may remember from the
physics courses.
Itzhak Bentov also used
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Kind of makes me wish I had gone to MIU; this
analogy just came to
me a few years ago when I was thinking about the
relationship
between Brahman and the classic seven states of
consciousness :-)
On Aug 13, 2005, at 4:39 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Good question! I would say offhand that the double cone is actually
the central core of a torus (the Hiranyagarbha-field), which in turn
is one of the countless Krishna-bubbles or Universes, and so
on...:-)
Have you read the myth of Er in
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Kind of makes me wish I had gone to MIU; this
analogy just came to
me a few years ago when I was thinking about the
relationship
between Brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Kind of makes me wish I had gone to MIU; this
analogy just came to
me a
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimological Aspects - Which is Maharishi?
of original
purity of which we partake, there's just a -we must purify the world- approach.
That's not very advaita. Moreover, remaking the world is not very advaita
either. All of which leads
One apparently cannot determine the state of consciousness of
another from their actions; probably given the observer/observed
uncertainty one can never adequately determine the state of
consciousness of another, if one is not functioning at least from
Brahman and willing to completely
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 11:54 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dvaita Vs. Advaita - Epistimological
Aspects - Which is Maharishi?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"Rory Goff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
wrote: One apparently cannot determine the state of
consciousness of an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 4:31 PM, akasha_108 wrote:
Einstein and other relativity theorists, used a similar double
cone to
explain the time/space continuum and called the negative space
Elsewhere. As most MIU core course
Yes, you can "experience" Unity, but you cannot "experience"
Brahman -- Brahman experiences you :-)I spent many years doing Forest Academys where
Maharishi and his white pundits talked about the distinction between unity and
brahman, and the main point of difference was always having to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 4:39 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Good question! I would say offhand that the double cone is actually
the central core of a torus (the Hiranyagarbha-field), which in
turn
is one of the countless
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you can experience Unity, but you cannot experience
Brahman -- Brahman experiences you :-)
I spent many years doing Forest Academys where Maharishi and his
white pundits talked about the distinction between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you can experience Unity, but you cannot experience
Brahman -- Brahman experiences you :-)
I spent many years doing Forest Academys where Maharishi and his
white pundits
What is a white pundit?
Is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I spent many years doing Forest Academys where Maharishi and his
white pundits
What is a white pundit?
Is that anything like a white
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
He used the double-cone analogy?
Oh yeah--took it to really the most experiential heights IMO. He also
describes the macrocosmic hiranyagarbha in some detail.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Yes, I recall learning a lot of this stuff amongst the Pythagoreans
and Neoplatonists, but don't recall if I've read Plato's Republic.
Many thanks, Vaj; I will keep my eyes open for it :-)
Just do a web search for it plato myth of er. It's the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
He used the double-cone analogy?
Oh yeah--took it to really the most experiential heights IMO. He
also
describes the macrocosmic hiranyagarbha in some detail.
Cool. Bentov
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, you can experience Unity, but you cannot experience
Brahman -- Brahman experiences you :-)
I spent many years doing Forest
On Aug 13, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Cool. Bentov lives! :-)
I just recently read parts of his daughters biography of Ben. Quite
the man.
There is also actually a quantum field theory based on the torus model
of consciousness.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Yes, I recall learning a lot of this stuff amongst the
Pythagoreans
and Neoplatonists, but don't recall if I've read Plato's
Republic.
Many thanks, Vaj; I will keep my eyes
What is a "white pundit"?Is that
anything like a "white Russian"?His non Indic
pundits such as John Haeglen, Bevan Morris, etc etc etc...
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Perhaps we could say Unity ripens the intimate identity between
perceiver and the perceived, while allowing the essential I-thou
relationship to remain relatively intact at the subtlest levels, while
BC destroys all such relationships and indeed every opposite or duality into
utter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're really attached to the notion of Brahman.
Could be. You are seeing a very small, specific, and rather
concentrated part of me here. When I am not talking to you guys, none
of this material exists for me at
On Aug 13, 2004, at 6:39 PM, Llundrub wrote:
Perhaps we could say Unity ripens the intimate identity between
perceiver and the perceived, while allowing the essential I-thou
relationship to remain relatively intact at the subtlest levels,
while BC destroys all such relationships and indeed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2004, at 6:39 PM, Llundrub wrote:
Perhaps we could say Unity ripens the intimate identity between
perceiver and the perceived, while allowing the essential I-thou
relationship to remain relatively intact at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Whereas the notion of Brahman is merely some sketchy concept with
no
actual basis in anything. All you're doing with this geometries of
awareness is reifying some errant conceptuality which itself has no
actual
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Kind of makes me wish I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until any of us stop casting shadows and our very normal intentions
manifest as siddhis (which others will no doubt notice) we ain't
there yet. snip
Now *this* is what I would call reification of the worst sort :-)
I heard a mystic one time speak, on a basic and interesting point
about communication.
He was from Africa, a big guy (kind of looked like an old African
King);
Anyway he said, that it really doesn't matter what you say or if you
are understood, because no one really understands anyone else,
It seems to me that all *anyone* does who speaks of the unspeakable,
is "reifying some errant conceptuality," and yet I enjoyed reading of
"reifications" like these when I thought myself on a path, and I enjoy
playing with these "reifications" now when there is evidently no path. No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems to me that all *anyone* does who speaks of the
unspeakable,
is reifying some errant conceptuality, and yet I enjoyed reading
of reifications like these when I thought myself on a path, and
I
enjoy playing
On Aug 13, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until any of us stop casting shadows and our very normal intentions
manifest as siddhis (which others will no doubt notice) we ain't
there yet. snip
Now *this* is what I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Until any of us stop casting shadows and our very normal
intentions
manifest as siddhis (which others will no doubt notice) we
ain't
there yet. snip
R. wrote:
Now *this* is what I would call reification of the
Don't hold back, Llundrub -- tell me what you
*really* think :-)Seriously, did I inadvertently push some button when I
compared the various states of consciousness to conic sections? Are you
particularly attached to one of these states of consciousness, or
something?-Sorry, once I got
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't hold back, Llundrub -- tell me what you *really* think :-)
Seriously, did I inadvertently push some button when I compared the
various states of consciousness to conic sections? Are you
particularly attached to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In dvaita religions good is seen battling evil and one must close
ranks and act upon the directions of the goodly master, or one is
damned.
In Advaita all that one surveys is the expression of the ultimate,
and
90 matches
Mail list logo
