Religious fanatics definitely need something done with them:
US Pastor Tony Miano sparks outcry by suggesting Nepalis should not rebuild
their 'pagan shrines'
Forget the ZZ Top beards and the Bayou accents, the Robertsons of
West Monroe, La., are a family of traditional American entrepreneurs:
ambitious, rich and spectacularly successful.
'A Calculated Push Into Entertainment Lifts `Duck Dynasty'
Family's Fortunes'
New York Times:
Now that the fourth season premiere of AE's Duck Dynasty
has shattered the record for the highest-rated show of its kind
history...
'5 Reasons Why Duck Dynasty Is a Great All-American Show'
http://tinyurl.com/kzvesur http://tinyurl.com/kzvesur
ooops forget to mention: Jon Gnarr promised not to keep his campaign
promises: [:D]
+ Continuous visibility
+ Free towels at all swimming pools
+ A polar bear at the zoo
+ For only ONE Santa Claus
+ All kinds of misfortune
+ A drug-free Parliament in 2020
--- In
Nice post Bob. I think we all could use a break from another Imagine
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii_99@... wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4PZL7wg_g4
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
Recent posts and conversations have left me pondering
the curious phenomenon of people becoming offended
when someone pokes fun at something they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
Recent posts and conversations have left me pondering
the curious phenomenon of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
Recent
A simple repost, to remind folks that this latest
meltdown on the part of these two is really about
two recent posts. The first:
Look at the Pseudofeminist Twins, accusing the
media of *the same behavior* that both Hillary
Clinton and Sarah Palin displayed in spades,
completely unable to see in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
A simple repost, to remind folks that this latest
meltdown on the part of these two is really about
two recent posts.
Sez Barry, demonstrating exactly the behavior we
pointed out: dishonestly attempting to spin takedowns
and
TurquoiseB wrote:
The common denominators of all of these events seem to be:
1) someone poking fun at a belief they consider worthy
of poking fun at, and 2) someone else who is attached to
that belief going postal because their belief has been
laughed at...
Going 'postal'? Isn't that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
Recent posts and conversations have left me pondering
the curious phenomenon of people becoming offended
when someone pokes fun at something they believe.
And some of us have been pondering for quite a while
now the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:22 AM, sparaig wrote:
Of course, is Buddhism what the Buddha taught?
Which Buddha?
whichever.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idiot who had only read Buddhism For Dummies
On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:22 AM, sparaig wrote:Of course, is Buddhism what the Buddha taught? Which Buddha?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
anonff write to Peter:
The experiece was very confusing to have and moreso to describe. If I
were the one doing the witnessing, I would experience myself as
separate from Being. This was not that. I would be, say, standing and
talking to someone, see them, see their mouth moving, hear the words
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- So, you have that experience of witnessing. Good,
and may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- So, you have that experience of witnessing. Good,
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Do you treat people as well as you are able to
treat them, Barry?
I think he does. He just apparently is severely challenged in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- So, you have that experience of witnessing. Good, and may I
ask, has this led to a total eradication of suffering in the world?
It has allowed me to see Reality, that everything is in balance. Do
bad things still
TurquoiseB wrote:
The thing I'm still working on is how to improve
my compassion when dealing with skunks.
Heh.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
TurquoiseB wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sri Bevan Morris to be Mahesh's successor
Newsgroups:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idiot who had only read Buddhism For Dummies
(and yes, there is such a book, and strangely enough
it's actually pretty good)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...Just as you assumed that it was Ok to trash a book
you've never read because of its pop-culture title.
Elitists tend to think alike.
My heavens we have struck a nerve. How youÕve divined from the pixels
before
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...Just as you assumed that it was Ok to trash a book
you've never read because of its pop-culture title.
Elitists tend to think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is Awakening something to be believed in? Does what
you believe in have anything to do with becoming
enlightened?
Yes, you must
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is Awakening something to be believed in? Does what
you believe in have anything to do with becoming
enlightened?
Yes, you must
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spare egg writes:
Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people.
Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult
job of mind-reading to assume something,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course one needs to be aware of the true definition of Assume.
As I remember the statement goes, When we use that
I have/had an experience for a few months and on and off since, that
left me baffled and I spoke directly to Maharishi about it on a coufse
back in 1980. My experience was one in which while I was standing
there talking to someone I experienced that they were separate from
Being. The way I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is Awakening something to be believed in? Does what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have/had an experience for a few months and on and
off since, that
left me baffled and I spoke directly to Maharishi
about it on a coufse
back in 1980. My experience was
Peter
The experiece was very confusing to have and moreso to describe. If I
were the one doing the witnessing, I would experience myself as
separate from Being. This was not that. I would be, say, standing and
talking to someone, see them, see their mouth moving, hear the words
but they seemed
--- So, you have that experience of witnessing. Good, and may I
ask, has this led to a total eradication of suffering in the world?
If not, why not? Your experience, if that word can be used (since
it's happening to a relative body) leaves one in the dark as to so
what?...what are the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- So, you have that experience of witnessing. Good,
and may I ask, has this led to a total eradication of
suffering in the world?
jumping in uninvited
Is total eradication of suffering in the world the
only worthy
Sounds like the perfect duality of CC. There is
Self/nothingness/consciousness and then everything
else which has this flat or false quality to it. As
if it isn't real at all. I used to call it the
cardboard world. No substance to it. It all hung like
a tiny basket within That.
--- anonyff [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- So, you have that experience of witnessing. Good,
and may I ask, has this led to a total eradication of
suffering in the world?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, It sounds
like he MAY be mad at something. Just in case, I will be careful not
to use
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
read.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, why bother with what often/usually is perceived as an
attack, and then criticize for saying that's an attack?
I don't believe I
Spare egg writes:
Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people.
Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult
job of mind-reading to assume something, comment on that assumption,
and get CONFIRMATION of that assumption and therefore to continue to
assume
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The clinging
to self is going to lose. That's just the
way the world works.
Tom T:
Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, laughing at
the clinging to the idea that can not
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The clinging
to self is going to lose. That's just the
way the world works.
Tom T:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I believe that Barry has indicated that he believes that laughing
AT is good for the person being laughed at, or something along
those lines. He's even implied that he WAS attacking, but won't
quite own up to it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
one is laughing *at* somebody is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laughing at someone is always an attack,
virtually by definition. As I've noted
several times, however, that doesn't mean
that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
You're conflating the perspective of the
attacker
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Laughing at someone is always an attack,
virtually by definition. As I've noted
several times, however, that doesn't mean
that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, It sounds
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
one is laughing *at* somebody is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language,
in case, I will be careful not or jokes that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
in case, I will be careful not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
in case, I will be careful not
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
it helps him or not, though...
I suspect it has the opposite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip So, the same with akashanon. The more he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do with anyone else's? I make no such assumption.
Tom has had his own experiences, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon.
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
helps him or not, though...
Tom T:
Darn Jim you weren't supposed to tell him. He is such a perfect mirror
of how it used to be that is not hard to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging
is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are
challenged.
Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the other day,
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
helps him or not, though...
Tom T:
Darn
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:So, the same with akashanon. He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
Mahafuckyas. Now THAT cracked me right up!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
who have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know
whether it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the There is no me-versus-them,
we-are-all one-experience...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.
I suspect that this description has almost nothing to
do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
Mahafuckyas. Now THAT cracked me right
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
descried as there is no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
So, the same with akashanon.
He actually prefers Akashic Moose.
for dessert?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
A couple of question for you:
1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the
above?
2. what is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
A couple of question for you:
1.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is Awakening something to be believed in? Does what
you believe in have anything to do with becoming
enlightened?
Yes, you must absolutely believe in the fact that you can and will
gain enlightenment, no matter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not the most refined
behavior. But for it to be an attack, to draw blood, the insultee
has to play victim and accept it as an insult.
For it to be an attack and for it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not the most refined
behavior. But for it to be an attack, to draw blood, the insultee
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
