date:20161014

[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" is 
from the extremely right-wing Newsmax. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing 
Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 
 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 Russian President Vladimir Putin could be prepping for new world war as 
relations with the United States and other Western countries continue to 
disintegrate, accor...


 
 View on www.newsmax.com 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-14 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 
 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 
 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 Russian President Vladimir Putin could be prepping for new world war as 
relations with the United States and other Western countries continue to 
disintegrate, accor...
 
 
 
 View on www.newsmax.com 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Re: For Feste (And Me)

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I've suffered from Trump Anxiety for months, although it is abating now. His 
chances of winning are around 15%, according to 538. I will be relieved when it 
is all over, but it is a chastening thought that someone like Trump could get 
so close to the White House. 
 

 Very true and I believe it to be the mark of a good person who has suffered 
anxiety over this whole thing. Trump is such a menace, so contorted, so ill and 
to think he was sort of close enough to touch the White House is reason enough 
for great fear. But most of the world has seen him for what he is. It is a cool 
thing that what might bring him down are the very women who he violated. Of 
course, it is really who he is which is his undoing but it takes a few brave 
souls to come out and add their stories. I do believe I might actually believe 
that karma is a real thing after this...
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Don't feel bad. It appears it is a National problem right now... I can 
certainly relate.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Many years ago, I was around some asshole who said he wanted to 'rape' my
(female) house-mate at the time. The same way Trump did - just part of the
conversation. I said that it wouldn't be a good idea, ended the visit, and
never saw him again. Just like Trump, we weren't in a locker room, and he
wasn't joking.

In any case, kind of a weird analogy for Trump to make, since it has been at
least a quarter century since that bloated, physical wreck of a human being,
that pathetically overstuffed, sausage-casing of digested fast-food, saw the
inside of a locker room. How could he possibly know what men say in them?

Good Lord, you've done it again.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Bill's accusers came forward immediately. Trumps, as many as thirty years
later in the middle of a political campaign with media bending over backwards,
trying to discredit him. Hillary can't win on merit or accomplishments and has
high negativity rating. All she can do is find a way to make Trump look more
negative than her.
Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around many men in
a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude at times and usually
does.

From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers
are, of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things
are "horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he
did those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his
words.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the
hell?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

I've heard that talk can get pretty crude and often does in the estrogen
filled locker rooms. :-D

The fascist media coverage of the Presidential campaign is very Shakespearean:
much ado about nothing.

Character - it actually counts for something. It's not about the 'talk'
anymore, Bhari, it's about the actions and the corruptness behind the actions.
You trivialize something that is not trivial. Trump believes he has the right
to violate others. He believes himself justified in taking whatever he wants.
You simply don't get it. You need to work on that.

On 10/14/2016 10:30 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

From: feste37 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote :

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder.
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and
never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran
against a Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he
supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a
*patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when
Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.

I dare you to say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have
gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah
to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth.
There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for
these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway
he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront him
as you are to vilify Hillary. You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it
takes to stand up to such intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even
though, in reality, he is a pitiable loser.

From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And that makes it right. Just like the fact that hundreds of thousands of men
have raped women and that makes it okay. It appears numbers and frequency of
occurrence validates a thing. You putz.

From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: CIA Prepping for Cyber Attack on Russia

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Probably the kind of idiots who won't do anything that would lead to the whole 
Internet becoming unreliable. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Oh great! You think that Yahoo has problems now just wait because if 
 this starts the whole Internet will become unreliable. And people with 
 be pissed! What kind of idiots do we have running US government?
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cia-prepping-possible-cyber-strike-against-russia-n36
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cia-prepping-possible-cyber-strike-against-russia-n36
 
 Note the mainstream news source. It's not a conspiracy theory.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fwd: Snopes

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

This must be a really old article. There has been no mystery about who runs the
site since I started using it many years ago.

About snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

About snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp The snopes.com website
was founded by David Mikkelson, who lives and works in the Los Angeles area.

View on www.snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp
Preview by Yahoo

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

-Original Message-
From: Don Loos
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: Fri, Oct 14, 2016 7:12 pm
Subject: Fwd: Snopes

DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ ON sNOPES!

Snopes Got Snoped

http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/549519_400684293325790_831357802_n.jpg
Snopes is run by a man and a woman with no background in investigation using
Google. Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any
comment, claim and email. Once negative article by them and people point and
say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their
methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and
what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was
behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it.
Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no
big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no
researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers
reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop
operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal
background or experience in investigative research.
http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/102210_1614_somuchforsn11.png
David and Barbara Mikkelson pictured above; are from San Fernando Valley of
California. They started their website 'Snopes' about 13 years ago. After a
few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and
neutral. But over the past couple of years people started asking questions when
'Snopes' was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also
criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the
'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in
controversial issues.
In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville,
Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet.
The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation
of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of
State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of
the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David
Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inacuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's
contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the
phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them
that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.
But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that
no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet,
Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the
"final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their
"fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards
liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet
job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the
"main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment
of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others,
as being particularly biased and agenda-modivated.
So if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have
heard, by all means do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you
were a liberal with an internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com
http://wikipedia.com either as their team of amateur editors have also been
caught in a number of bold-faced liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate
http://www.redstate.com/bs/2009/12/20/climate-cultist-william-connolley-sabotages-wikipedia/
and their religious treatment of Obama
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/17/andy-martin-wikipedia-is_n_396003.html.)
Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding that
they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things conservative.
Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read their sources
for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now
seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do.

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Just found another mention of this, in an article in TheAtlantic.com:
 

 One spectacular irony in all of this is how Trump’s tactics mirror the 
criticism he’s lobbed at his opponent. In the second presidential debate, he 
claimed Hillary Clinton “attacked” the women who accused her husband of sexual 
assault, “and attacked them viciously.” Hillary Clinton has defended her 
husband, but there’s little evidence 
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/10/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-viciously-attack/
 to support Trump’s broader claim.

 

 Donald Trump’s Warning for Women 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trumps-warning-for-women/504251/
 
 
 Donald Trump’s Warning for Women 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trumps-warning-for-women/504251/
 The Republican nominee is doubling down on his attacks against those who have 
accused him of sexual assault.
 
 
 
 View on www.theatlantic.com 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trumps-warning-for-women/504251/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 You're right. It hadn't occurred to me--I guess because it was so obvious--but 
Parton's column is the only place I've seen the point made explicitly. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Heather Digby Parton made the point in an article on Salon today, after 
quoting Trump:
 

 That's right, the same man who staged a televised stunt just four days ago in 
which he sanctimoniously slammed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary 
Clinton for supposedly trashing the reputations of assault victims, stood 
before the cameras and trashed the reputations of assault victims.

 

 Thanks for that, Judy. It is such a simple observation to make I was wondering 
why it wasn't being used constantly as this whole sordid drama plays out.
 

 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s conspiratorial ranting 
and Michelle Obama’s inspiring call for decency 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Trump's dog-whistle diatribe was this campaign's darkest hour, while Michelle 
Obama's speech was its finest


 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] What you should be talking about instead of groping

2016-10-14 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]


War is a really bad idea!
http://abcnews.go.com/International/ways-russia-telling-people-prepare-war/story?id=42800992

On 10/14/2016 09:13 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:


The badminton game between the two lousy Presidential candidates is a
distraction from what Americans should be paying attention to. The
mainstream US media is to blame. Welcome to fascist America (actually
been around for some time). So why is the US trying to pick a war with
Russia?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/721008/Russia-America-nuclear-war-Putin-Obama-bunker-fallout-shelter-Syria-Bashar-al-Assad

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sat 15-Oct-16 00:15:07 UTC

2016-10-14 Thread FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 10/08/16 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 10/15/16 00:00:00
334 messages as of (UTC) 10/14/16 23:51:10

 67 authfriend
 49 anon_alias 
 38 awoelflebater
 30 olliesedwuz
 26 hepa7
 19 steve.sundur
 17 Bhairitu noozguru
 14 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 13 jr_esq
  9 feste37 
  9 archonangel
  9 Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa
  9 Archer Angel archonangel
  8 dhamiltony2k5
  3 yifuxero
  3 ultrarishi 
  3 j_alexander_stanley
  3 email4you mikemail4you
  2 William Leed WLeed3
  1 mdixon.6569
  1 Dick Mays dickmays
  1 'Rick Archer' rick
Posters: 22
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com

[FairfieldLife] Jesus meets Nathaniel

2016-10-14 Thread yifux...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

2 min video:
 

 Jesus meets Nathaniel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ZZfSDWR44
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ZZfSDWR44 
 
 Jesus meets Nathaniel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ZZfSDWR44 Jesus meets 
Nathaniel Gospel according to St John
 
 
 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ZZfSDWR44 
 Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Fwd: Snopes

2016-10-14 Thread William Leed wle...@aol.com [FairfieldLife]

-Original Message-
From: Don Loos 
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: Fri, Oct 14, 2016 7:12 pm
Subject: Fwd: Snopes

DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ ON sNOPES!

Snopes Got Snoped

Snopes is run by a man and a woman with no background in investigation using 
Google.

Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim 
and email. Once negative article by them and people point and say, "See, I told 
you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training 
that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? For 
several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website 
Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for 
this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of 
investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying 
historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on 
current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was 
started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in 
investigative research.

David and Barbara Mikkelson pictured above;  are from San Fernando Valley of 
California. They started their website  'Snopes'  about 13 years ago. After a 
few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and 
neutral. But over the past couple of years people started asking questions when 
'Snopes' was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also 
criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 
'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in 
controversial issues.
In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville, 
Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet. 
The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation 
of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of 
State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of 
the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David 
Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inacuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's 
contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the 
phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them 
that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.
But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that 
no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet, 
Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the 
"final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their 
"fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards 
liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet 
job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the 
"main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment 
of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others, 
as being particularly biased and agenda-modivated.
So if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have 
heard, by all means do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you 
were a liberal with an internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com either as 
their team of amateur editors have also been caught in a number of bold-faced 
liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate and their religious treatment of 
Obama.) Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding 
that they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things 
conservative. Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read 
their sources for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now 
seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do.

[FairfieldLife] CIA Prepping for Cyber Attack on Russia

2016-10-14 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

Oh great! You think that Yahoo has problems now just wait because if 
this starts the whole Internet will become unreliable.  And people with 
be pissed!  What kind of idiots do we have running US government?
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cia-prepping-possible-cyber-strike-against-russia-n36

Note the mainstream news source.  It's not a conspiracy theory.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Yet another woman groped by Trump...oh wait, that's not a woman...

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Two more actual women have come out with stories of Trump groping them: 

 Two more women say Donald Trump sexually assaulted them: “It was very random, 
very nonchalant” 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 
 
 Two more women say Donald Trump sexually assaulted ... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 When Donald Trump said he could just "grab a woman by the" crotch, he may have 
meant more than he said VIDEO
 
 
 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 Rudy Guliani is one of Trump's closest advisors. Here is one of their first 
encounters. 

Rudy Giuliani in Drag Smooching Donald Trump 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be
 
 Rudy Giuliani in Drag Smooching Donald Trump 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be Yes, it's former 
NYC mayor Rody Giuliani in drag having his "breasts" shamelessly violated by 
"Apprentice" tycoon Donald Trump. Clip from ne...


 
 View on www.youtube.com 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] YS: mahaa-videhaa

2016-10-14 Thread Archer Angel archonan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

It would seem that the passage simply indicates the result of successful 
practice.

  From: "he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 12:37 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] YS: mahaa-videhaa

YS III 44 (in Judge's "translation-commentary"; can be also at least 43):
bahir akalpitaa vRttir mahaa-videhaa; tataH prakaashaavaraNa-kSayah
44. When the ascetic has completely mastered all the influences which the body 
has upon the inner man, and has laid aside all concern in regard to it, and in 
no respect is affected by it, the consequence is a removal of all obscurations 
of the intellect.

बहिरकल्पिता वृत्तिर्महाविदेहा ततः प्रकाशावरणक्षयः ॥ ४३॥

Many translators take that suutra (following the YF suutra) containing a 
separate siddhi-technique, saMyama on mahaa-videhaa (great-bodylessness). Seem 
to recall almost right away when saw it, seemed to me like a description of one 
aspect of the experience during YF. (The word saMyama is absent in that suutra, 
but, have to admit, so is it in many of the siddhi suutras proper.)
Anyhoo, Judge is one of the rare commentators that seem to agree with me. At 
leasthis "translation" doesn't seem to me to consider that suutra being 
instruction fora separate siddhi?
Other translations:
[HA]: 
When The Unimagined Conception Can Be Held Outside, i.e. Unconnected With The 
Body, It Is Called Mahavideha Or The Great Discarnate. By Samyam On That The 
Veil Over The Illumination (Of Buddhisattva) Is Removed.[IT]: (44):The power of 
contacting the state of consciousness which is outside the intellect and is 
therefore inconceivable is called Maha-videha. From it is destroyed the 
covering of light.[VH]: 
The non-imaginary (actual) external vrtti activity (defining citta) is the 
great out-of-body state. From that, the dispersing of the covering of 
light.[BM]: 
The turning of thought without reference to the external world is called “the 
great disembodied thought”; from which this veil that obscures the light is 
destroyed.[SS]: (44):By samyama on thought waves unidentified by and external 
to the body [maha-videha, or the great bodilessness], the veil over the light 
of the Self is destroyed.[SP]: 
(44) By making samyama on the thought-waves of the mind when it is separated 
from the body—the state known as the Great Disincarnation–all coverings can be 
removed from the light of knowledge.[SV]: (44):By making Samyama on the real 
modifications of the mind, which are outside, called great disembodiness, comes 
disappearance of the covering to light.
  #yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663 -- #yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv5164724663 
#yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv5164724663 
#yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp #yiv5164724663hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp #yiv5164724663ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp .yiv5164724663ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp .yiv5164724663ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663ygrp-mkp .yiv5164724663ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv5164724663ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv5164724663 
#yiv5164724663ygrp-sponsor #yiv5164724663ygrp-lc #yiv5164724663hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv5164724663 
#yiv5164724663ygrp-sponsor #yiv5164724663ygrp-lc .yiv5164724663ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv5164724663 
#yiv5164724663activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv5164724663
 #yiv5164724663activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv5164724663 
#yiv5164724663activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv5164724663 #yiv5164724663activity span 
.yiv5164724663underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5164724663 
.yiv5164724663attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv5164724663 .yiv5164724663attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv5164724663 .yiv5164724663attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv5164724663 .yiv5164724663attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv5164724663 .yiv5164724663attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv5164724663 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv5164724663 .yiv5164724663bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv5164724663 
.yiv5164724663bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv5164724663 dd.yiv5164724663last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv5164724663 dd.yiv5164724663last p 
span

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread Archer Angel archonan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Perhaps they are out, groping about.

  From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 3:06 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question
   
    The Trump supporters on this forum have gone very quiet. I wonder why?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, 
of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are 
"horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did 
those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
  #yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430 -- #yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp #yiv3135902430hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp #yiv3135902430ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp .yiv3135902430ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp .yiv3135902430ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430ygrp-mkp .yiv3135902430ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3135902430ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430ygrp-sponsor #yiv3135902430ygrp-lc #yiv3135902430hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430ygrp-sponsor #yiv3135902430ygrp-lc .yiv3135902430ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3135902430
 #yiv3135902430activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3135902430 #yiv3135902430activity span 
.yiv3135902430underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3135902430 
.yiv3135902430attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv3135902430 .yiv3135902430attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 .yiv3135902430attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3135902430 .yiv3135902430attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv3135902430 .yiv3135902430attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv3135902430 .yiv3135902430bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv3135902430 
.yiv3135902430bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 dd.yiv3135902430last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3135902430 dd.yiv3135902430last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3135902430 
dd.yiv3135902430last p span.yiv3135902430yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv3135902430 div.yiv3135902430attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 div.yiv3135902430attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv3135902430 div.yiv3135902430file-title a, #yiv3135902430 
div.yiv3135902430file-title a:active, #yiv3135902430 
div.yiv3135902430file-title a:hover, #yiv3135902430 div.yiv3135902430file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 div.yiv3135902430photo-title a, 
#yiv3135902430 div.yiv3135902430photo-title a:active, #yiv3135902430 
div.yiv3135902430photo-title a:hover, #yiv3135902430 
div.yiv3135902430photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3135902430 
div#yiv3135902430ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3135902430ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv3135902430yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv3135902430 
.yiv3135902430green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv3135902430 .yiv3135902430MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv3135902430 o {font-size:0;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv3135902430
 #yiv3135902430reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv3135902430 
#yiv3135902430reco-desc

[FairfieldLife] Yet another woman groped by Trump...oh wait, that's not a woman...

2016-10-14 Thread olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Rudy Guliani is one of Trump's closest advisors. Here is one of their first 
encounters. 

Rudy Giuliani in Drag Smooching Donald Trump 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 
 Rudy Giuliani in Drag Smooching Donald Trump 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be Yes, it's former 
NYC mayor Rody Giuliani in drag having his "breasts" shamelessly violated by 
"Apprentice" tycoon Donald Trump. Clip from ne...
 
 
 
 View on www.youtube.com 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are 
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder.
 

 Actually, that's a classic *Karl Rove* tactic.
 

 The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things
 

 I think we all know (including you) that what set off Trump's accusers was his 
flat denial in the second debate that he had ever sexually assaulted anyone, 
after having been caught bragging about doing exactly that.
 

 and never called a racist until he ran against a Democrat.
 

 Au contraire, Pierre. His racism has been a recurrent theme for as long as 
he's been a public figure:
 

 Trump Once Sued By Feds For Not Renting To Blacks 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_83.html
 
 
 Trump Once Sued By Feds For Not Renting To Blacks 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_83.html
 NEW YORK -- Donald Trump’s vehement questioning regarding President Obama's 
place of birth has provoked charges of racism, with a number of public figure...
 
 
 
 View on www.huffingtonpost.com 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_83.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 Lots and lots of examples in this story.
  

 This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly did these 
things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal society*up 
bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill Clinton perjured 
himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"

 

 That wasn't "all we heard," not by a long shot. He was condemned for his lying 
as much as for the deeds themselves.
 

 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories.
 

 I'm sure you can point out these "wholes," Mike. We'll wait. (You can forget 
about the no-armrest-in-first-class dodge, BTW. That's been thoroughly 
debunked.)
 

 The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and compliance and 
coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.

 

 Wikileaks isn't "exposing" any such thing.
 

 Once again, Mike, you're doing an extremely poor job of defending your man. 
You make him look worse instead of better.
 

 

 

 
 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 
   
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

I've heard that talk can get pretty crude and often does in the estrogen
filled locker rooms. :-D

The fascist media coverage of the Presidential campaign is very
Shakespearean: much ado about nothing.

On 10/14/2016 10:30 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bill's accusers came forward immediately. Trumps, as many as thirty
years later in the middle of a political campaign with media bending
over backwards, trying to discredit him. Hillary can't win on merit or
accomplishments and has high negativity rating. All she can do is find
a way to make Trump look more negative than her.
Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around
many men in a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude
at times and usually does.

*From:* feste37
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's
accusers are, of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of
similar things are "horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that
he himself said that he did those things to women. So they are merely
confirming the truth of his words.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill
Clinton's accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same
thing he accuses his opponent of? I haven't seen this point made
anywhere in the media yet. What the hell?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: Jill Stein prefers Trump to Clinton

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Jill Stein (no relation, thank goodness) is a doofus. 

 Hillary isn't going to "slide into nuclear war very quickly." Or at all,,for 
that matter, if she can possibly help it.
 

 Trump, on the other hand, might well do so. He's crazier than Putin realizes.
 

 And no, we don't have a choice other than Trump or Hillary.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 No, she's not supporting Trump but just sayin' (from a C-SPAN interview):
 
 "Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly 
 from her declared policy in Syria. So I won't sleep well at night if 
 Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary 
 Clinton is elected. Fortunately, we have another choice other than these 
 two candidates, who are both promoting lethal policies. But on the issue 
 of war and nuclear weapons, and the potential for nuclear war, it is 
 actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump ..."
 
 http://www.snopes.com/jill-stein-endorsed-donald-trump/ 
http://www.snopes.com/jill-stein-endorsed-donald-trump/

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Bill's accusers came forward immediately. Trumps, as many as thirty years later 
in the middle of a political campaign with media bending over backwards, trying 
to discredit him. Hillary can't win on merit or accomplishments and has high 
negativity rating. All she can do is find a way to make Trump look more 
negative than her.Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been 
around many men in a testosterone filled environment.  Can get pretty crude at 
times and usually does.


  From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question
   
    I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers 
are, of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things 
are "horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he 
did those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his 
words. 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
  #yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642 -- #yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp #yiv2443837642hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp #yiv2443837642ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp .yiv2443837642ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp .yiv2443837642ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642ygrp-mkp .yiv2443837642ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv2443837642ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642ygrp-sponsor #yiv2443837642ygrp-lc #yiv2443837642hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642ygrp-sponsor #yiv2443837642ygrp-lc .yiv2443837642ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2443837642
 #yiv2443837642activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2443837642 #yiv2443837642activity span 
.yiv2443837642underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2443837642 
.yiv2443837642attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv2443837642 .yiv2443837642attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 .yiv2443837642attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv2443837642 .yiv2443837642attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv2443837642 .yiv2443837642attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv2443837642 .yiv2443837642bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv2443837642 
.yiv2443837642bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 dd.yiv2443837642last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2443837642 dd.yiv2443837642last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2443837642 
dd.yiv2443837642last p span.yiv2443837642yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv2443837642 div.yiv2443837642attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 div.yiv2443837642attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv2443837642 div.yiv2443837642file-title a, #yiv2443837642 
div.yiv2443837642file-title a:active, #yiv2443837642 
div.yiv2443837642file-title a:hover, #yiv2443837642 div.yiv2443837642file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 div.yiv2443837642photo-title a, 
#yiv2443837642 div.yiv2443837642photo-title a:active, #yiv2443837642 
div.yiv2443837642photo-title a:hover, #yiv2443837642 
div.yiv2443837642photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2443837642 
div#yiv2443837642ygrp-mlmsg #yiv2443837642ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv2443837642yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv2443837642 
.yiv2443837642green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv2443837642 .yiv2443837642MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv2443837642 o {font-size:0;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv2443837642 
#yiv2443837642photos div div {border:1px solid

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

2016-10-14 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are busted 
for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. The 
problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost immediately. 
Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent till now. Trump 
has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and never accused 
publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran against a 
Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly 
did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal 
society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill Clinton 
perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.

  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
   
    So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or 
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
  #yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388 -- #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp #yiv3673122388hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp #yiv3673122388ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp .yiv3673122388ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp .yiv3673122388ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp .yiv3673122388ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-sponsor #yiv3673122388ygrp-lc #yiv3673122388hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-sponsor #yiv3673122388ygrp-lc .yiv3673122388ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3673122388
 #yiv3673122388activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388activity span 
.yiv3673122388underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3673122388 
.yiv3673122388attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 
.yiv3673122388bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 dd.yiv3673122388last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 dd.yiv3673122388last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 
dd.yiv3673122388last p span.yiv3673122388yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388file-title a, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388file-title a:active, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388file-title a:hover, #yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388photo-title a, 
#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388photo-title a:active, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388photo-title a:hover, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 
div#yiv3673122388ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3673122388ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv3673122388yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv3673122388 
.yiv3673122388green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv3673122388 o

[FairfieldLife] Jill Stein prefers Trump to Clinton

2016-10-14 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

No, she's not supporting Trump but just sayin' (from a C-SPAN interview):

"Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly 
from her declared policy in Syria. So I won't sleep well at night if 
Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary 
Clinton is elected. Fortunately, we have another choice other than these 
two candidates, who are both promoting lethal policies. But on the issue 
of war and nuclear weapons, and the potential for nuclear war, it is 
actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump ..."

http://www.snopes.com/jill-stein-endorsed-donald-trump/

[FairfieldLife] Re: What you should be talking about instead of groping

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Actually, Bhairitu, if you did just a little critical thinking, you'd realize 
this nuclear hoo-hah is about Putin trying to scare Americans into electing 
Trump, because Putin knows how easy it will be to manipulate him. So Putin is 
painting Hillary as the candidate who wants war with Russia and Trump as the 
"peace candidate." 

 Get a clue, dude.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The badminton game between the two lousy Presidential candidates is a 
 distraction from what Americans should be paying attention to. The 
 mainstream US media is to blame. Welcome to fascist America (actually 
 been around for some time). So why is the US trying to pick a war with 
 Russia?
 
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/721008/Russia-America-nuclear-war-Putin-Obama-bunker-fallout-shelter-Syria-Bashar-al-Assad
 
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/721008/Russia-America-nuclear-war-Putin-Obama-bunker-fallout-shelter-Syria-Bashar-al-Assad

[FairfieldLife] 7 REASONS WHY THE NEXT US PRESIDENT SHOULD MEDITATE

2016-10-14 Thread email4you mikemail4...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


http://www.worldpeacesolutions.net/2016/07/15/seven-reasons-why-the-next-u-s-president-should-meditate/
By  Dr. Norman Rosenthal 
 Published May 17, 2016   FoxNews.com...

Running for president is thought to be among the hardest, most stressful, and 
emotionally exhausting experiences one can imagine. As a psychiatrist, my 
natural instinct is to try to understand what advice would be most helpful to 
give to the winning candidate.  If asked, I would quote Victor Hugo, who said: 
“Meditate.  All is full of light, even the night.” Meditation is becoming 
increasingly popular as millions of people discover its benefits. There are 
several different types of meditation. The one I know best is Transcendental 
Meditation, which I practice regularly and recommend to numerous patients

[FairfieldLife] Re: For Feste (And Me)

2016-10-14 Thread feste37

I've suffered from Trump Anxiety for months, although it is abating now. His 
chances of winning are around 15%, according to 538. I will be relieved when it 
is all over, but it is a chastening thought that someone like Trump could get 
so close to the White House. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Don't feel bad. It appears it is a National problem right now... I can 
certainly relate.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/

[FairfieldLife] What you should be talking about instead of groping

2016-10-14 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

The badminton game between the two lousy Presidential candidates is a 
distraction from what Americans should be paying attention to. The 
mainstream US media is to blame.  Welcome to fascist America (actually 
been around for some time).  So why is the US trying to pick a war with 
Russia?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/721008/Russia-America-nuclear-war-Putin-Obama-bunker-fallout-shelter-Syria-Bashar-al-Assad

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

You're right. It hadn't occurred to me--I guess because it was so obvious--but 
Parton's column is the only place I've seen the point made explicitly. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Heather Digby Parton made the point in an article on Salon today, after 
quoting Trump:
 

 That's right, the same man who staged a televised stunt just four days ago in 
which he sanctimoniously slammed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary 
Clinton for supposedly trashing the reputations of assault victims, stood 
before the cameras and trashed the reputations of assault victims.

 

 Thanks for that, Judy. It is such a simple observation to make I was wondering 
why it wasn't being used constantly as this whole sordid drama plays out.
 

 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s conspiratorial ranting 
and Michelle Obama’s inspiring call for decency 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Trump's dog-whistle diatribe was this campaign's darkest hour, while Michelle 
Obama's speech was its finest


 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

 “This is the first week in nearly six weeks that I have thought Hillary would 
win Iowa, given all of Trump's demographic advantages,” said one Iowa 
Republican“Donald Trump is in a virtual meltdown as a surge of requested 
early ballots start reaching voters. Trump's collapse is a perfectly timed gift 
to the Clinton campaign. He's locking in his vote at a time when the bottom is 
dropping out.”

 

 GOP insiders: Trump's chances fading 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/gop-insiders-outlook-for-trump-is-grim-229765
 
 
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/gop-insiders-outlook-for-trump-is-grim-229765
 
 
 GOP insiders: Trump's chances fading 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/gop-insiders-outlook-for-trump-is-grim-229765
 "This is the first week in nearly six weeks that I have thought Hillary would 
win Iowa, given all of Trump's demographic advantages," said an Iowa Rep...
 
 
 
 View on www.politico.com 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/gop-insiders-outlook-for-trump-is-grim-229765
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  
 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The Trump supporters on this forum have gone very quiet. I wonder why?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, 
of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are 
"horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did 
those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] For Feste (And Me)

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Don't feel bad. It appears it is a National problem right now... I can 
certainly relate.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

I was thinking the same thing. They've probably slunk off with their tails 
between their legs to hide out in The_Closet. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Trump supporters on this forum have gone very quiet. I wonder why?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, 
of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are 
"horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did 
those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Heather Digby Parton made the point in an article on Salon today, after 
quoting Trump:
 

 That's right, the same man who staged a televised stunt just four days ago in 
which he sanctimoniously slammed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary 
Clinton for supposedly trashing the reputations of assault victims, stood 
before the cameras and trashed the reputations of assault victims.

 

 Thanks for that, Judy. It is such a simple observation to make I was wondering 
why it wasn't being used constantly as this whole sordid drama plays out.
 

 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s conspiratorial ranting 
and Michelle Obama’s inspiring call for decency 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Trump's dog-whistle diatribe was this campaign's darkest hour, while Michelle 
Obama's speech was its finest


 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The Trump supporters on this forum have gone very quiet. I wonder why?
 

 Thank God for that. They're probably too busy online ordering their ball caps 
and other Made-in-China Trump paraphernalia.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, 
of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are 
"horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did 
those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread feste37

The Trump supporters on this forum have gone very quiet. I wonder why?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, 
of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are 
"horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did 
those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread feste37

I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, 
of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are 
"horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did 
those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

'Trump Fatigue'. :-) The guy is sinking fast, and has upped his rhetoric to the 
point that just tracking his lies leads to mental exhaustion. He is a paper 
tiger, business flop, sexual predator, and very angry little boy, rolled into 
one. At this point, no sane person can support him, and won't. I hope the 
Republican Party learns a lesson from this truly insane candidate, if there is 
anything left of them, once Trump is soundly defeated. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Heather Digby Parton made the point in an article on Salon today, after quoting 
Trump:
 

 That's right, the same man who staged a televised stunt just four days ago in 
which he sanctimoniously slammed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary 
Clinton for supposedly trashing the reputations of assault victims, stood 
before the cameras and trashed the reputations of assault victims.

 

 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s conspiratorial ranting 
and Michelle Obama’s inspiring call for decency 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 
 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Trump's dog-whistle diatribe was this campaign's darkest hour, while Michelle 
Obama's speech was its finest
 
 
 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  
 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] One Question

2016-10-14 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] YS: mahaa-videhaa

2016-10-14 Thread he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]



 YS III 44 (in Judge's "translation-commentary"; can be also at least 43):
 

 bahir akalpitaa vRttir mahaa-videhaa; tataH prakaashaavaraNa-kSayah
 

 44. When the ascetic has completely mastered all the influences which the body 
has upon the inner man, and has laid aside all concern in regard to it, and in 
no respect is affected by it, the consequence is a removal of all obscurations 
of the intellect.


 
बहिरकल्पिता वृत्तिर्महाविदेहा ततः प्रकाशावरणक्षयः ॥ ४३॥

Many translators take that suutra (following the YF suutra) containing a 
separate siddhi-technique, saMyama on mahaa-videhaa (great-bodylessness). Seem 
to recall almost right away when saw it, seemed to me like a description of one 
aspect of the experience during YF. (The word saMyama is absent in that suutra, 
but, have to admit, so is it in many of the siddhi suutras proper.) 
Anyhoo, Judge is one of the rare commentators that seem to agree with me. At 
least
 his "translation" doesn't seem to me to consider that suutra being instruction 
for
 a separate siddhi?
 

 Other translations:
 

 [HA]: 
When The Unimagined Conception Can Be Held Outside, i.e. Unconnected With The 
Body, It Is Called Mahavideha Or The Great Discarnate. By Samyam On That The 
Veil Over The Illumination (Of Buddhisattva) Is Removed.
 [IT]: (44):
 The power of contacting the state of consciousness which is outside the 
intellect and is therefore inconceivable is called Maha-videha. From it is 
destroyed the covering of light.
 [VH]: 
The non-imaginary (actual) external vrtti activity (defining citta) is the 
great out-of-body state. From that, the dispersing of the covering of light.
 [BM]: 
The turning of thought without reference to the external world is called “the 
great disembodied thought”; from which this veil that obscures the light is 
destroyed.
 [SS]: (44):
 By samyama on thought waves unidentified by and external to the body 
[maha-videha, or the great bodilessness], the veil over the light of the Self 
is destroyed.
 [SP]: 
(44) By making samyama on the thought-waves of the mind when it is separated 
from the body—the state known as the Great Disincarnation–all coverings can be 
removed from the light of knowledge.
 [SV]: (44):
 By making Samyama on the real modifications of the mind, which are outside, 
called great disembodiness, comes disappearance of the covering to light.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Woo hoo, finally!

2016-10-14 Thread he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]


 One more Nblprz for Abraham & Sara's descendants!
 

 The Nobel Prize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize is an annual, 
international prize first awarded in 1901 for achievements in Physics 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics,Chemistry 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physiology_or_Medicine, Literature 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Literature, and Peace 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Peace_Prize. An associated prize in 
Economics 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences has 
been awarded since 1969.[1] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates#cite_note-Britannica1-1
 Nobel Prizes have been awarded to over 870 individuals,[2] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates#cite_note-2 of 
whom 185 - over 21.26% - were Jewish https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish or 
people of Jewish descent, although Jews and people of Jewish descent comprise 
less than 0.2% of the world's population [3] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates#cite_note-20percent-3
 (or 1 in every 500 people). Overall, Jews or people of Jewish descent [Note 1] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates#cite_note-4 have 
won a total of 41% of all the Nobel Prizes in economics, 28% of medicine, 26% 
of physics, 19% of chemistry, 13% of literature and 9% of all peace awards.[4] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates#cite_note-about.com-article-5
 Jews or people of Jewish descent have been recipients of all six awards. The 
first Jewish recipient,Adolf von Baeyer 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Baeyer, was awarded the prize in 
Chemistry in 1905.
 Jews or people of Jewish descent have been recipients of one or more of The 
Nobel Prizes for 80 of The Nobel Prize 115 year history. And in 55 of the 58 
years since 1958.
 

 FWIW, Arabs (at least some of whom are descendants of Abr. &  Hagar), have won
 staggering 10 Nblprz's:
 List of Arab Nobel laureates - Wikipedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arab_Nobel_laureates

 
 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arab_Nobel_laureates 
 
 List of Arab Nobel laureates - Wikipedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arab_Nobel_laureates The Nobel Prize is 
an annual, international prize first awarded in 1901 for achievements in 
Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, and...
 
 
 
 View on en.wikipedia.org 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arab_Nobel_laureates 
 Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Tube: Ayaan's message to Hillary!

2016-10-14 Thread he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]



 Is Islam a Religion of Peace? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AkAGc5nOXw

 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AkAGc5nOXw 
 
 Is Islam a Religion of Peace? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AkAGc5nOXw Is 
Islam a religion of peace? Is it compatible with Western liberalism? Or does 
Islam need a reformation, just as Christianity had the Protestant Reforma...
 
 
 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AkAGc5nOXw 
 Preview by Yahoo

44 matches

Mail list logo