[Fink-users] firefox2 fails (10.5, 64-bit)

2009-09-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I am trying to build a fresh 64-bit fink installation on my 10.5.8 (Intel) box. While installing bundle-gnome, firefox2 fails as follows: gcc -o prsystem.o -c-I/opt/sw/include -pipe -Wmost -fno-common -no-cpp-precomp -pthread -Os -fPIC -UDEBUG -DMOZILLA_CLIENT=1 -DNDEBUG=1

Re: [Fink-users] firefox2 fails (10.5, 64-bit)

2009-09-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 12:32 -0500 on 2009-9-16 Robert Wyatt wrote: I didn't know that 10.5.8 supported 64-bit and I also didn't know that fink supported this combination. Well, it should, at least the kernel runs 64-bit applications and gcc produces 64-bit code. I had no idea that fink is not supposed

[Fink-users] graphviz-2.22.2-1 build fails

2009-09-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Building graphviz fails with the following error: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DUSE_TCL_STUBS -DUSE_TK_STUBS -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework/Versions/8.4/Headers -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/Headers -I/opt/sw/lib/ocaml -idirafter

Re: [Fink-users] firefox2 fails (10.5, 64-bit)

2009-09-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Thank you for getting back to me so quickly. At 14:21 -0400 on 2009-9-16 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Firefox3 should be able to build on x86_64, but I haven't actually been able to test it. Unfortunately firefox3 also fails here with the following error: c++ -o jsregexp.o -c

[Fink-users] opengl-py25 builds with minimal patching on 64-bit fink (Mac OS 10.5.x)

2009-09-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I doscovered that opengl-py25 does not build on my 64-bit fink installation (Mac OS 10.5.*) simply because /sw64/bin/tclsh8.4 does not exist (not sure why). Going however to /sw64/bin/tclsh8.5 causes the thing to build fine. I am not sure if it actually works mind you (I have yet to install

[Fink-users] sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12 build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*)

2009-09-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, While installing pygame-py25 I get stuck on sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12, whose build fails. On a first look it appears like a missing header but I did not have the time to dig deeper. Any advice is appreciated. This all happens on a 64-bit fink under Mac OS 10.5.8, Xcode 3.1.3. gcc

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12 build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*)

2009-09-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 19:01 -0400 on 2009-9-26 Daniel Johnson wrote: On Sep 26, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: While installing pygame-py25 I get stuck on sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12, whose build fails. On a first look it appears like a missing header but I did not have the time to dig deeper

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12 build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*)

2009-09-28 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 20:55 +0200 on 2009-9-27 Max Horn wrote: Am 26.09.2009 um 21:02 schrieb Stefan Bruda: Hi, While installing pygame-py25 I get stuck on sdl-mixer-1.2.8-12, whose build fails. On a first look it appears like a missing header but I did not have the time to dig deeper

[Fink-users] pygame-py25 build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*, Xcode 3.1.3)

2009-09-28 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, The setup of pygame fails with a segfault right at the beginning, i.e., at the command LOCALBASE=/sw64 /sw64/bin/python2.5 config.py The command just segfaults when changing into the build directory and calling it by hand, so I am not sure how to debug it any further. Here is the

[Fink-users] dosbox build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*, Xcode 3.1.3)

2009-09-28 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Dosbox fails to build for me (on 64-bit), apparently because the precision of various integer types has changed. As usual advice is appreciated. g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I/sw64/include -I/sw64/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE -fast -MT core_dyn_x86.o

[Fink-users] libgtop2.0.7 build fails (64-bit, Mac OS 10.5.*, Xcode 3.1.3)

2009-09-29 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, me again, Continuing my 64-bit saga I discovered a build failure for lingtop, as follows: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../sysdeps/darwin -I../../include -I/sw64/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw64/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/sw64/include/libgtop-2.0

Re: [Fink-users] pyobjc-py25 segfaults on 64-bit Fink, Intel OS 10.5.8

2009-09-29 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 14:01 -0400 on 2009-9-29 Daniel Macks wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 01:07:43PM -0300, monipol wrote: Hello, James. pyobjc-py25-2.0+svn2008-4 segfaults when imported on 64- bit Fink python2.5, Intel OS 10.5.8: $ /sw64/bin/python2.5 Python 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Sep 28

Re: [Fink-users] pyobjc-py25 segfaults on 64-bit Fink, Intel OS 10.5.8

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 01:42 +0200 on 2009-9-30 Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 29 Sep 2009, at 23:21, Stefan Bruda wrote: In any event, here is how the thing fails to build: gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-fused-madd -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 - Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Ibuild/codegen

Re: [Fink-users] pyobjc-py25 segfaults on 64-bit Fink, Intel OS 10.5.8

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Sorry, I hit send prematurely, but I did not want to say much more except that we apparently have the same build process and I am willing to bet that your pyobjc does not work either. In any event, thank you for your assistance. Cheers, Stefan -- If it was so, it might be; and if it were

[Fink-users] GHC build failure (10.6, x86_64)

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, GHC does not build on my system (Mac OS 10.6.4, Xcode 3.2, Fink 0.29.13 (x86_64), Zquartz 2.5.3) out of the box. Here is how it fails: Preprocessing library hpc-0.5.0.3... In file included from Reflect.hsc:35:

[Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Pdftk appears to install nicely, but every time I try to run it I get: godel:cs/techreps pdftk rt-testing.pdf background buresearch.pdf output rr.pdf dyld: _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address() error dyld: Symbol not found: _libiconv Referenced from:

[Fink-users] MPlayer fails to build (10.6, x86_64)

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, MPlayer does not build on my system (Mac OS 10.6.4, Xcode 3.2, Fink 0.29.13 (x86_64), Zquartz 2.5.3) out of the box. Here is how it fails: cc -I../libavcodec -I../libavformat -Wdisabled-optimization -Wno-pointer-sign -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I. -I.. -I../libavutil -Wall -Wno-switch

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

2010-08-23 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 09:14 -0400 on 2010-8-23 Jack Howarth wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 06:40:43PM -0400, Stefan Bruda wrote: Pdftk appears to install nicely, but every time I try to run it I get: godel:cs/techreps pdftk rt-testing.pdf background buresearch.pdf output rr.pdf dyld

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

2010-08-23 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 12:04 +0200 on 2010-8-23 Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 23 Aug 2010, at 00:40, Stefan Bruda wrote: If I build the 32-bit version I get it to run without a hitch, the problem is only with the 64-bit version. Possibly, but gcc45 (at least 4.5.1) has the same defect in 32bit. I

Re: [Fink-users] pdftk run failure (10.6, x86_64)

2010-08-23 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 10:22 -0400 on 2010-8-23 Jack Howarth wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:16:47AM -0400, Stefan Bruda wrote: Interestingly enough, the 32-bit version also links against Apple's libiconv: godel:~ otool -L /opt/sw32/bin/pdftk /opt/sw32/bin/pdftk: /opt/sw32/lib

[Fink-users] ghostscript versus ghostscript-esp

2010-10-05 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I discovered that I need ghostscript-esp (because of foomatic-filters), so I installed it (replacing ghostscript). Problem is, gs now segfaults every time I launch it (on perfectly good Postscript files which are viewed fine on my Linux box). I am sure I miss something, but what? Also ggv

Re: [Fink-users] ghostscript versus ghostscript-esp

2010-10-05 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 00:13 -0400 on 2010-10-6 Stefan Bruda wrote: I discovered that I need ghostscript-esp (because of foomatic-filters), so I installed it (replacing ghostscript). Problem is, gs now segfaults every time I launch it (on perfectly good Postscript files which are viewed fine on my Linux box

Re: [Fink-users] ghostscript versus ghostscript-esp

2010-10-06 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 09:49 -0400 on 2010-10-6 Alexander Hansen wrote: ghostscript-esp is kind of old. There were some patches applied just to make it build on x86_64, but I'm not sure whether it ran for anybody. Oh, OK, so foomatic-filters are also not useable (since they depend on ghostscript-esp).

[Fink-users] stunnel4-4.34-1+10.6 not working

2010-11-15 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I have upgraded stunnel4 to the version mentioned in the subject. This new version however fails to connect. This is what I get in the logs (IP addresses obscured): Nov 15 14:15:18 godel stunnel[26702]: LOG5[26702:140735073397920]: Reading configuration from file

Re: [Fink-users] stunnel4-4.34-1+10.6 not working

2010-11-15 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 16:00 -0500 on 2010-11-15 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/15/10 2:37 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: I have upgraded stunnel4 to the version mentioned in the subject. This new version however fails to connect. This is what I get in the logs (IP addresses obscured): Nov 15

Re: [Fink-users] pop3s://pop.gmail.com protocol died unexpectedly

2010-11-17 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 14:20 +0100 on 2010-11-16 Christof Wolf wrote: I updated openssl to 1.0.0 NeoVIII:lib LPM$ ls -l libcr* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 326208 12 Nov 01:20 libcroco-0.6.3.0.1.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 24 12 Nov 01:20 libcroco-0.6.3.dylib - libcroco-0.6.3.0.1.dylib

Re: [Fink-users] mplayer-1.0.0rc2-1011 failed

2010-12-27 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 15:31 +0100 on 2010-12-23 Christof Wolf wrote: I am trying to compile kdemultimedia4-mac, but failing to compile the mplayer (intel, 64bit, unstable) any idea? I asked once about this failure and apparently it has been a known issue that has not been fixed for roughly half a year.

Re: [Fink-users] mplayer-1.0.0rc2-1011 failed

2010-12-27 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 18:25 -0500 on 2010-12-27 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 12/27/10 5:51 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Hi, At 15:31 +0100 on 2010-12-23 Christof Wolf wrote: I am trying to compile kdemultimedia4-mac, but failing to compile the mplayer (intel, 64bit, unstable) any idea? I

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-06 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Having upgraded to the latest and greatest TeXLive (2010), I am having problems with some AMS fonts: godel:Admin/sparc dvips courses This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2011.02.06:1853' - courses.ps kpathsea:

[Fink-users] Xpdf is weird after upgrade

2011-02-06 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Having upgraded from xpdf_3.02-1003 to xpdf_3.02.5-1 I noticed that the latter behaves weirdly. It opens the bookmark side pane (or whatever the name of that is) even if a document has no bookmarks. Problem is, the said side pane eats into the document area (which is not resized). Closing

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
? If it is then it is my fault (and the modified patch works unqualified) and I hereby apologize. If it is not then please find the example that triggers the problem above. At Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:16:18 -0500, Stefan Bruda wrote: At 21:54 +0900 on 2011-2-8 Tomoaki Okayama wrote

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 15:44 +0100 on 2011-2-9 Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 09 Feb 2011, at 01:16, Stefan Bruda wrote: kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+456/600 --dpi 456 eurm10 mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10. mktexpk: perhaps

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 16:46 +0900 on 2011-2-9 Tomoaki Okayama wrote: I tested your source, but I didn't get such a message (mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10) during the compile. $ dvips eurm.dvi This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software

Re: [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-10 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 02:23 +0100 on 2011-2-10 Jean-François Mertens wrote: I might agree that this type of thing is a fault of texlive: the ultimate sources should be there, even if only for the case when someone wants to re-create pfa or pfb files using conceivably better algorithms. (Similarly

[Fink-users] DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH

2011-04-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 15:36 -0400 on 2011-4-8 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 4/8/11 3:32 PM, Ken Mankoff wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/8/11 3:18 PM, Ken Mankoff wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Alexander Hansen

Re: [Fink-users] 32 bit programs on 64 bit snow leopard

2011-04-17 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 19:47 -0700 on 2011-4-16 Richard Miles wrote: Is it possible to set up fink so that it builds 32 bit programs as 32 bit and 64 bit programs as 64 bit. I am doing so with mplayer and firefox (pdftk used to be another one until recently). What I have is two instances of fink, one

[Fink-users] Xpdf and images

2011-04-17 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I have a problem with the way xpdf handles images while printing, including Type 3 fonts. Specifically, none of these print; I get instead blobs with no meaning. Here is an example http://turing.ubishops.ca/misc/vpl-closure-1.ps, please look at the 13th row of the second column, where the

[Fink-users] Transcode deps messed up

2011-05-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Attempting to upgrade (and then install) transcode fails, apparently because of mismatched versions of libavformat52-shlibs (0.6.1-5, dependency) and libavformat-dev (0.4.20071217, build dependency). Attempting to change the build dependency to libavformat52-dev does not work as the headers

Re: [Fink-users] Transcode deps messed up

2011-05-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 11:32 -0400 on 2011-5-16 Alexander Hansen wrote: Following again the suggestions I finally get a stable (but unsatisfactory) state: godel:finkinfo/utils fink install transcodeInformation about 9934 packages read in 1 seconds. Failed: Internal error: node

Re: [Fink-users] Transcode deps messed up

2011-05-16 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 14:31 -0400 on 2011-5-16 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 5/16/11 11:48 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: At 11:32 -0400 on 2011-5-16 Alexander Hansen wrote: Following again the suggestions I finally get a stable (but unsatisfactory) state: godel:finkinfo/utils

Re: [Fink-users] Transcode deps messed up

2011-05-17 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 23:03 -0400 on 2011-5-16 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 05/16/2011 11:25 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Attempting to upgrade (and then install) transcode fails, apparently because of mismatched versions of libavformat52-shlibs (0.6.1-5, dependency) and libavformat-dev

[Fink-users] Firefox fails to build (10.7 Xcode 4.3)

2012-03-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, It appears that the new Xcode introduces a bit of an issue with (at least) Firefox. I am blaming Xcode (though I might be wrong) because I built Firefox successfully earlier and as far as I know the only things that changed since is said Xcode. In any event, here is the problem: In file

Re: [Fink-users] Firefox fails to build (10.7 Xcode 4.3)

2012-03-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, Thanks so much for the quick response. At 08:03 -0500 on 2012-3-9 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Unfortunately, I'm not sure if anything can be done here. While the mozilla code is in theory capable of being built with clang according to their Bugzilla, I'm not sure if that

Re: [Fink-users] Firefox fails to build (10.7 Xcode 4.3)

2012-03-10 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 07:08 -0500 on 2012-3-10 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: To save on patch hacking, try just adding SetCC: gcc-4 SetCXX: g++-4 to the firefox8.info file. This might work assuming all the firefox modules read the environment or inherit it from the master module (which

[Fink-users] X desktop manager availability in 10,7

2012-03-29 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, I keep monitoring the 10.7 tree (I have a 10.7 virtual machine for the purpose) and I keep noticing that no desktop manager (such as Gnome, KDE, or Xfce) is yet available. I am therefore wondering whether this is a matter of issues with those desktop managers or is simply caused by the

Re: [Fink-users] X desktop manager availability in 10,7

2012-03-30 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 14:35 -0700 on 2012-3-29 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 3/29/12 2:08 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: I keep monitoring the 10.7 tree (I have a 10.7 virtual machine for the purpose) and I keep noticing that no desktop manager (such as Gnome, KDE, or Xfce) is yet available. I am

Re: [Fink-users] X desktop manager availability in 10,7

2012-03-30 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 14:05 -0400 on 2012-3-30 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: If you have 10.7 running someplace, it is pretty easy to test packages from the 10.5/6 tree. Sometimes they'll work as is, other times they'll need a little patching, and sometimes they'll fail miserably :) Of course,

[Fink-users] Metacity on 10.7 builds but does not build

2012-03-30 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, I am attempting to build metacity on 10.7 (just a random package toward bundle-gnome). Using fink the configuration goes fine and then make fails as follows (/opt/sw is my fink prefix): make make all-recursive Making all in src [ ... ] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H

Re: [Fink-users] Metacity on 10.7 builds but does not build

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 11:33 +0200 on 2012-3-31 Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 31.3.2012 um 02:52 schrieb Stefan Bruda: I am sure I am missing something, but what would be the difference between the fink environment and the shell? Advice is appreciated. This can be checked quite easily: copy

Re: [Fink-users] firefox fails to build

2012-04-11 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 11:27 -0400 on 2012-4-11 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Unfortunately, this is a known failure with Xcode 4.3 and firefox8. And more unfortunately, firefox8 is probably the last version of firefox-x11 that's buildable on OS X without some *major* effort. Mozilla did a lot

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-1 failed

2012-04-11 Thread Stefan Bruda
Webkit fails as follows on a fresh fink install on 10.7 (Xcode 4.2). I noticed an older thread dealing with the same package and at least in part same error http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user/33461, but there was no resolution on that one either. Advice is appreciated. CXXLD

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-1 failed

2012-04-11 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 17:55 -0700 on 2012-4-11 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 4/11/12 4:57 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Webkit fails as follows on a fresh fink install on 10.7 (Xcode 4.2). I noticed an older thread dealing with the same package and at least in part same error http://thread.gmane.org

[Fink-users] Evince missing patch file in the 10.7 tree

2012-04-11 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, I just tried to install evince on my fresh 10.7 fink install and it complains like this: Failed: Cannot read PatchFile /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/evince.patch (/opt/sw being my Fink prefix). Sure enough, said patch is missing. I thought you may want to know

[Fink-users] Successfully bundle-gnome build on 10.7

2012-04-11 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, I just managed to build bundle-gnome on my 10.7 box (Xcode 4.2). The whole thing appears to work well except for the minor quirk of needing to launch gnome-settings-daemon by hand. The whole thing was built copying the missing packages from the 10.6 tree and performing minor tweaks only.

Re: [Fink-users] Evince missing patch file in the 10.7 tree

2012-04-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 23:04 -0400 on 2012-4-11 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 4/11/2012 10:12 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: I just tried to install evince on my fresh 10.7 fink install and it complains like this: Failed: Cannot read PatchFile /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo

[Fink-users] Enlightenment builds and works on 10.7

2012-04-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I don't know how pertinent this is to the world at large (who has probably moved to more modern window managers by now ;-) ), but I am partial to the enlightenment window manager (the 16 i.e. old variety), having been using it for ages. I am in fact using a horrible hack to have it on 10.6

Re: [Fink-users] firefox8 still fails to build

2012-04-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 15:33 -0700 on 2012-4-12 Alexander Hansen wrote: 4.1 is the last Xcode to provide gcc-4.2. In principle firefox8 could use BuildDepends: gcc4.2 on 10.7, unless Stefan was able to get it to build with clang from Xcode 4.2, in which case it could have BuildDepends (clang =3.0).

[Fink-users] msttcorefonts?

2012-04-13 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, During my migration to 10.7 I noticed that msttcorefonts is missing from the 10.7 tree, but just copying the info files over (together with the needed cabextract) does it nicely. Is there any reason these have not been ported? Many thanks, Stefan -- If it was so, it might be; and if it

[Fink-users] Move Fink on a new (identical) machine

2012-04-13 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, Now that I am satisfied with how Fink works on my test (virtual) machine, I am ready to upgrade my main machine and move what I already have there. I see at least three ways of doing it: 1. Most tempting, I thought of just copying the whole /sw (/opt/sw in my case actually) to the new

Re: [Fink-users] Move Fink on a new (identical) machine

2012-04-13 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 11:05 -0700 on 2012-4-13 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 4/13/12 9:31 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Now that I am satisfied with how Fink works on my test (virtual) machine, I am ready to upgrade my main machine and move what I already have there. I see at least three ways

Re: [Fink-users] msttcorefonts?

2012-04-13 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 19:35 +0200 on 2012-4-13 Martin Costabel wrote: On 13/04/12 17:46, Stefan Bruda wrote: Hello, During my migration to 10.7 I noticed that msttcorefonts is missing from the 10.7 tree, but just copying the info files over (together with the needed cabextract) does it nicely

Re: [Fink-users] Window frames in Gnome on 10.7.3

2012-04-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 17:22 -0600 on 2012-4-25 Gary K Olson wrote: I realized that there were now enough files available for Lion to run gnome-panel, so I downloaded and set things up to run rootless without metacity. However, I have no window frames. You *must* specify a window manager. You can

Re: [Fink-users] Window frames in Gnome on 10.7.3

2012-04-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 11:37 -0400 on 2012-4-26 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: metacity builds on 10.7 with only minor changes to the .info, but it crashes on startup, which is why it has not been added to 10.7. Metacity worked for me well last time I tried (I don't care too much about it in fact but it is

Re: [Fink-users] Window frames in Gnome on 10.7.3

2012-04-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 14:18 -0400 on 2012-4-26 Stefan Bruda wrote: At 11:37 -0400 on 2012-4-26 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: metacity builds on 10.7 with only minor changes to the .info, but it crashes on startup, which is why it has not been added to 10.7. Metacity worked for me well

[Fink-users] fuse4x-0.10.0-1 broken?

2012-04-29 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Latest fuse4x installation seems to be broken on my machine. I get the following: godel:~ fink list fuse Information about 4692 packages read in 0 seconds. i fuse4x-dev 0.10.0-1File System in User Space (fuse4x) i fuse4x-kext 0.10.0-1

Re: [Fink-users] fuse4x-0.10.0-1 broken?

2012-04-29 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 15:51 -0700 on 2012-4-29 Brendan Cully wrote: On Sunday, 29 April 2012 at 14:40, Stefan Bruda wrote: Latest fuse4x installation seems to be broken on my machine. I get the following: godel:~ fink list fuse Information about 4692 packages read in 0

[Fink-users] firefox8 configure failure

2012-08-07 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, Building firefox8 fails as follows: checking HOST_LIBIDL_LIBS... -L/opt/sw/lib -lIDL-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl checking for glib-2.0 = 1.3.7 gobject-2.0... yes checking GLIB_CFLAGS... -I/opt/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include checking GLIB_LIBS...

Re: [Fink-users] firefox8 configure failure

2012-08-07 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 15:26 -0400 on 2012-8-7 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: I've just checked in a fix. 'fink selfupdate' should bring the new version. The failure was caused by having a 64bit egrep at the front of $PATH (Fink's on 10.7, system's on 10.8) since neither took kindly to being run

[Fink-users] farsight2 build failure

2012-08-13 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, In the latest (for me...) update-all farsight2 fails because of a typo: Making all in libs make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/sw/src/fink.build/farsight2-0.0.21-3/farsight2-0.0.21/docs/libs' Makefile:773: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop.

[Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

2012-11-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, I am pretty sure that I saw somewhere a note about upgrading from 10.7 to 10.8 but I cannot find it anymore. I apologize therefore in advance if my question is a duplicate (and I will appreciate a pointer to the first occurrence...). I am contemplating upgrading my machine to Mac OS

Re: [Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

2012-11-26 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 18:23 -0700 on 2012-11-26 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/26/12 3:34 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: I am contemplating upgrading my machine to Mac OS 10.8. It appears that Fink can be upgraded in place. After the OS upgrade I will therefore do the following: 1

Re: [Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

2012-11-27 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 20:06 -0700 on 2012-11-26 Alexander Hansen wrote: Is there anything I am missing and/or doing wrong? This is my main machine so I just want to be doubly-sure that the upgrade is not going to break things... Many thanks in advance. That looks good to me.

Re: [Fink-users] Mountain Lion Upgrade

2012-11-27 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 19:27 -0700 on 2012-11-27 Alexander Hansen wrote: and then an enumeration of many (all) installed packages. I also got an injected directory in %p/fink/10.8/local/ (this one probably during selfupdate though I am not really sure) with the following content:

Re: [Fink-users] tetex on 10.8/x86_64

2012-11-29 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 19:01 +0100 on 2012-11-29 Jean-Francois Donati wrote: what is the situation regarding tetex, and its porting to 10.8? is it likely to happen soon? I believe that teTeX has been dead for a long time. or is it discontinued, in which case, which package is the closest

[Fink-users] PatchFile portaudio2 checksum does not match

2012-12-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Last update fails because the following checksum mismatch. I am guessing that a patch update was not followed by the corresponding checksum update... Should any other information be needed just let me know. /opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-portaudio2-2.19.0-2021-1 (Reading

Re: [Fink-users] PatchFile portaudio2 checksum does not match

2012-12-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 20:43 -0700 on 2012-12-8 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 12/8/12 8:16 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Last update fails because the following checksum mismatch. I am guessing that a patch update was not followed by the corresponding checksum update... Should any other information

Re: [Fink-users] PatchFile portaudio2 checksum does not match

2012-12-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 21:49 -0700 on 2012-12-8 Alexander Hansen wrote: What OS version? Err, sorry, I thought that this does not matter for an MD5 checksum and the such. It all happens on 10.8 (Darwin Kernel Version 12.2.0), with fink 0.34.4 and Xcode 4.5.2. It _can_ matter, because

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libavcodec54-1.0-shlibs-1.0.1-1 failed

2012-12-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, In the last update I get a failure for libavcodec54-1.0 as follows: Looking for incorrect headers in 1158 dependency files... ./finkbuild/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.d uses /opt/sw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftconfig.h ./finkbuild/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.d uses

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling:libavcodec54-1.0-shlibs-1.0.1-1 failed

2012-12-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 13:36 -0500 on 2012-12-9 Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:44:57 -0700, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/9/12 10:22 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Hello, In the last update I get a failure for libavcodec54-1.0 as follows: Looking

[Fink-users] tar stuck!

2012-12-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, I am getting a strange problem when I try to upgrade anything that involves expanding tar archives. Updating readline6 for example gets stuck at the following: Unpacking fink-buildlock-readline6-6.2.4-1 (from .../fink-buildlock-readline6-6.2.4-1_2012.12.12-10.30.33_darwin-x86_64.deb) ...

Re: [Fink-users] tar stuck!

2012-12-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 08:55 -0700 on 2012-12-12 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 12/12/12 8:43 AM, Stefan Bruda wrote: I am getting a strange problem when I try to upgrade anything that involves expanding tar archives. Updating readline6 for example gets stuck at the following: Unpacking

Re: [Fink-users] Can not get this script to run

2013-02-21 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 13:16 -0700 on 2013-2-21 Alexander Hansen wrote: As I've said before, the gnome-session program itself is *broken*. It wasn't when this script was written, but something has changed since then and now it is. Interesting... Any idea why on my system gnome-session did not see

Re: [Fink-users] Can not get this script to run

2013-02-21 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 16:27 -0700 on 2013-2-21 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 2/21/13 3:53 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 2/21/13 3:16 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Interesting... Any idea why on my system gnome-session did not see this message, does not know that it is broken, and therefore works

[Fink-users] gcc48 vs gcc47

2013-04-05 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, Now that GCC 4.8 is out I am wondering whether it is safe to move my Fink installation from the gcc47 package to the latest and greatest. It should be a matter of uninstalling gcc47, gcc47-compiler, and gcc47-shlibs and installing the corresponding gcc48* packages, right? Actually now

Re: [Fink-users] gcc48 vs gcc47

2013-04-07 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, At 20:41 +0200 on 2013-4-5 Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 05.04.2013 um 19:18 schrieb Stefan Bruda: It should be a matter of uninstalling gcc47, gcc47-compiler, and gcc47-shlibs and installing the corresponding gcc48* packages, right? No, no, just install it! The INFO file

[Fink-users] mplayer run failure (openjpeg?)

2013-04-27 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Recently mplayer ceased to run properly (Mac OS 10.8.3, Xcode tools 4.6.0.0.1.1365, Fink 0.34.7, Fink tree synced a couple of minutes ago). Instead of the usual functionality running it results in the following: godel:~ mplayer /* This file was automatically generated by

Re: [Fink-users] mplayer run failure (openjpeg?)

2013-04-27 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, Thank you first of all for the quick response. At 20:17 -0400 on 2013-4-27 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 4/27/2013 7:48 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Hi, Recently mplayer ceased to run properly (Mac OS 10.8.3, Xcode tools 4.6.0.0.1.1365, Fink 0.34.7, Fink tree synced

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: osxfuse-2.5.6-1 failed

2013-09-30 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, The current update-all wants to update sshfs which in turns pulls osxfuse in. Problem is, osxfuse fails as follows: sudo -u fink-bld [ENV] sh -c /tmp/fink.7W2on sed -i.bak -e 's,/Library/Filesystems/,/opt/sw/lib/,' common/fuse_param.h sed -i.bak -e 's,/usr/local,/opt/sw,'

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: osxfuse-2.5.6-1 failed

2013-10-01 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 06:58 -0700 on 2013-10-1 Alexander Hansen wrote: The problem here appears to be due to the fact that there is not a 10.7 SDK in Xcode 5 at all, and that osxfuse doesn't declare a dependency on it even though it uses it: $ fink list sdk Information about 8024 packages read in

Re: [Fink-users] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2013-10-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, I am not sure whether the bounce below is of any consequence, but I thought that you guys would be interested in knowing about it given that the connection was refused by a server belonging to the Fink project. Apparently my system kept trying for 5 days or so before giving up... Cheers,

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

2013-12-02 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 11:31 -0800 on 2013-12-2 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 12/2/13 8:09 AM, Steve wrote: I have osx 10.9 and fink 0.36.1. When I try to build the osxfuse package, the build fails with the message: xcodebuild MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7 SDKROOT=macosx10.7 Build settings

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

2013-12-02 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 17:03 -0800 on 2013-12-2 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 12/2/13 4:54 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: This has been known to happen for at least two months http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/37403. That doesn't mean the maintainer read it. Unfortunately, he

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

2013-12-02 Thread Stefan Bruda
At 18:11 -0800 on 2013-12-2 Alexander Hansen wrote: On 12/2/13 5:59 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: Thanks, I was able to download the sources. Unfortunately said sources insist in wanting llvm-gcc42 (which does not exist anymore within Xcode) even after eliminating any reference thereof

Re: [Fink-users] fink doesn't find newest version of osxfuse

2013-12-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 10:24 -0800 on 2013-12-9 Alexander Hansen wrote: I just found a .info file that one of the other developers sent me a while back. This is why I *HATE* it when people don't use public channels for things like that. I uploaded it to

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-5 failed

2014-04-02 Thread Stefan Bruda
System info: Mac OS: 10.8.5 Package manager version: 0.36.3.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Apr 2 09:07:17 2014, 10.8, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main Xcode.app: 5.1 Xcode command-line tools: 5.1.0.0.1.1393561416 webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-5 is set to build with only one job. Failure:

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-5 failed

2014-04-04 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 00:54 +0200 on 2014-4-4 Martin Costabel wrote: I have also a patch for both of them that allows me to build webkit-1.0.2. I think the patch is non-toxic for previous build tools and OS versions, so I am just checking it in to CVS and wait what happens (webkit-1.0.2-1.2.7-6)

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: valgrind-3.9.0-1 failed

2014-04-08 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Configuring valgrind results in the following error: checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/opt/sw/src/fink.build/valgrind-3.9.0-1/valgrind-3.9.0': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details ###

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: valgrind-3.9.0-1 failed

2014-04-09 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 22:44 -0400 on 2014-4-8 Daniel Johnson wrote: Thanks, it was the -new_linker flag which is apparently no longer supported. Removing it fixed the build for me on 10.9. Let me know if it's good on 10.8 for you. I confirm that the new version builds fine on 10.8. Many thanks.

[Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libsidplay-1.36.59-1001 failed

2014-04-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hi, Fresh 10.9 fink installation with the binary distribution enabled chokes on compiling libsidplay as follows: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\\ -DPACKAGE=\libsidplay\ -DVERSION=\1.36.59\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=1

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libsidplay-1.36.59-1001 failed

2014-04-12 Thread Stefan Bruda
Hello, At 21:59 +0200 on 2014-4-12 Martin Costabel wrote: That configure script is 10 years old, from a time when iostream.h was still a valid C++ header file. It does #include iostream.h #include fstream.h and thinks the resulting error message about iostream.h not

  1   2   >