Thank you, Simon! That was exactly the problem! I turned off Microsoft
Security Essentials [MSE] and that solved the problem. I first tried to
disable the Adobe .exe files - that didn't help. I had to disable MSE. I
did alert the folks I had talked to at Adobe support, so hopefully they can
post
Thank you, Simon! That was exactly the problem! I turned off Microsoft
Security Essentials [MSE] and that solved the problem. I first tried to
disable the Adobe .exe files - that didn't help. I had to disable MSE. I
did alert the folks I had talked to at Adobe support, so hopefully they can
post
Hi Shelly
Sounds like you've got a solution, which is great.
In case you or others are interested, we deal with covers by making a
separate 1-page PDF from the graphics program (currently Illustrator).
In our FM file, we put a holding page. Once we've made the final PDF
from Framemaker, we use
program (currently Illustrator). In our
FM file, we put a holding page. Once we've made the final PDF from
Framemaker, we use Acrobat Pro to replace the holding page with the real
cover page, which takes a few seconds to do.
Cheers
Rebecca
Shelly Schneider she...@softest.com 6/03/13 17:56
Hello Shelly,
Are you perhaps using Microsoft Security Essentials [MSE] on your
workstation?
I have found from experience with customers that the Microsoft
Anti-virus Solution is way too aggressive, and was causing FrameMaker
and/or Acrobat Distiller to hand while attempting to print any
Hi Shelly
Sounds like you've got a solution, which is great.
In case you or others are interested, we deal with covers by making a
separate 1-page PDF from the graphics program (currently Illustrator).
In our FM file, we put a "holding" page. Once we've made the final PDF
from Framemak
ogram (currently Illustrator). In our
> FM file, we put a "holding" page. Once we've made the final PDF from
> Framemaker, we use Acrobat Pro to replace the holding page with the real
> cover page, which takes a few seconds to do.
>
> Cheers
> Rebecca
>
> >
Hello Shelly,
Are you perhaps using Microsoft Security Essentials [MSE] on your
workstation?
I have found from experience with customers that the Microsoft
Anti-virus Solution is way too aggressive, and was causing FrameMaker
and/or Acrobat Distiller to hand while attempting to print any
I have cover art using a PDF file. The cover bleeds on all edges. I have
been using this from at least Frame 7 up through Frame 10, with no issues.
My company purchased FrameMaker 11 and Acrobat Pro 11 for a new 64 bit
computer. Frame hangs when I try to Save as PDF or print to .ps using the
I have cover art using a PDF file. The cover bleeds on all edges. I have
been using this from at least Frame 7 up through Frame 10, with no issues.
My company purchased FrameMaker 11 and Acrobat Pro 11 for a new 64 bit
computer. Frame hangs when I try to Save as PDF or print to .ps using the
Hi,
We have recently upgraded to Windows7, 64-bit, and were also able to
upgrade to FrameMaker9. We have not yet committed to upgrading our
Acrobat 7 licenses (bundled with CS2; to upgrade that is ~$700 - a tad
steep for our tastes).
While we are pleased with our FM9 upgrade in general, we are
A couple of answers, cut in below.
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a
redheaded girl. -- Richard Thompson
No disclaimers apply.
old Acrobat 7 Pro on it. All works well,
except that the PDF Printer driver does not appear as a printer in the
Devices Printers dialog, nor is it available as an option when you
print via any application (including FrameMaker), nor can I Save As PDF
via FrameMaker. This leads me to believe
...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:10 AM
To: Ursula McCloy
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Is it possible to Save As PDF from FrameMaker 9 using Acrobat 7 on
Windows7?
OK, if you run the installation program
of such upgrades including any and all
applications you either explicitly or implicitly require.
With regards to generating reliable PDF files from FrameMaker 9 on
Windows 7, some ideas:
(1) FrameMaker 9 does come with a headless limited version
of Distiller 9 (you can't run
) We installed our old Acrobat 7 Pro on it. All works well,
except that the PDF Printer driver does not appear as a printer in the
Devices Printers dialog, nor is it available as an option when you
print via any application (including FrameMaker), nor can I Save As PDF
via FrameMaker. This leads
A couple of answers, cut in below.
Art Campbell
art.campbell at gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a
redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
No disclaimers apply.
We installed our old Acrobat 7 Pro on it. All works well,
> except that the PDF Printer driver does not appear as a printer in the
> Devices & Printers dialog, nor is it available as an option when you
> print via any application (including FrameMaker), nor can I Save As
rs-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:10 AM
To: Ursula McCloy
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Is it possible to Save As PDF from FrameMaker 9 using Acrobat 7 on
Windows7?
OK, if you run the in
of such upgrades including any and all
applications you either explicitly or implicitly require.
With regards to "generating reliable PDF files from FrameMaker 9 on
Windows 7," some ideas:
(1) FrameMaker 9 does come with a headless limited version
of Distiller 9 (you
) We installed our old Acrobat 7 Pro on it. All works well,
except that the PDF Printer driver does not appear as a printer in the
Devices & Printers dialog, nor is it available as an option when you
print via any application (including FrameMaker), nor can I Save As PDF
via FrameMaker. This l
Hi,
We have recently upgraded to Windows7, 64-bit, and were also able to
upgrade to FrameMaker9. We have not yet committed to upgrading our
Acrobat 7 licenses (bundled with CS2; to upgrade that is ~$700 - a tad
steep for our tastes).
While we are pleased with our FM9 upgrade in general, we are
You could use runfm from omsys.com, or set things up in FrameScript.
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincent and a redheaded girl. -- Richard Thompson
No
8:46 AM
To: kgrace4...@aol.com
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Printing PDF from Framemaker
You could use runfm from omsys.com, or set things up in FrameScript.
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincent
On 04/02/2010 10:41 PM, David Spreadbury wrote:
You want to specify *.ps in Print to File and select Separate File
for Each Document from Save Book As:. This will give you inidividual
postscript files for each chapter, named the same as the chapter
files.
--- On Thu, 2/4/10,
You could use runfm from omsys.com, or set things up in FrameScript.
Art Campbell
art.campbell at gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
No
, 2010 8:46 AM
To: kgrace4715 at aol.com
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Printing PDF from Framemaker
You could use runfm from omsys.com, or set things up in FrameScript.
Art Campbell
art.campbell at gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world
On 04/02/2010 10:41 PM, David Spreadbury wrote:
> You want to specify *.ps in Print to File and select Separate File
> for Each Document from Save Book As:. This will give you inidividual
> postscript files for each chapter, named the same as the chapter
> files.
>
> --- On Thu, 2/4/10, kgrace4715
I have book (e.g., book.bk) with files (Ch1.fm, Ch2.fm, Ch3.fm,Ch4.fm)
that I would like to print as pdf files. I would like a book.pdf (all
chapter files combined in one file) and Ch1.pdf, Ch2.pdf, Ch3.pdf and
Ch4.pdf. Printing the book.pdf file can be accomplished with the
setting of Print
...@aol.com kgrace4...@aol.com
Subject: Printing PDF from Framemaker
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010, 9:36 PM
I have book (e.g., book.bk) with files (Ch1.fm, Ch2.fm, Ch3.fm,Ch4.fm)
that I would like to print as pdf files. I would like a book.pdf (all
chapter files
I have book (e.g., book.bk) with files (Ch1.fm, Ch2.fm, Ch3.fm,Ch4.fm)
that I would like to print as pdf files. I would like a book.pdf (all
chapter files combined in one file) and Ch1.pdf, Ch2.pdf, Ch3.pdf and
Ch4.pdf. Printing the book.pdf file can be accomplished with the
setting of "Print
<kgrace4...@aol.com>
Subject: Printing PDF from Framemaker
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010, 9:36 PM
I have book (e.g., book.bk) with files (Ch1.fm, Ch2.fm, Ch3.fm,Ch4.fm)
that I would like to print as pdf files. I would like a book.pdf (all
chapter files co
Have been happily able to Print to an Adobe PDF printer definition
for months on my laptop and all of a sudden (in the throws of a release,
of course), this quit working. Only out of FrameMaker--I can still
generate a PDF from other applications (for example, Word and Excel).
File Print Book
Have been happily able to "Print" to an Adobe PDF printer definition
for months on my laptop and all of a sudden (in the throws of a release,
of course), this quit working. Only out of FrameMaker--I can still
generate a PDF from other applications (for example, Word and Excel).
File > Print Book
when opened in Acrobat
[version 6 onwards] displays correctly - with the contours and elevation
of the mountains shown in the custom spot colour. Acrobat displays the
contours and elevation numbers even if the Acrobat Overprint preview
option is *not* enabled.
When I import the PDF into FrameMaker
when opened in Acrobat
[version 6 onwards] displays correctly - with the contours and elevation
of the mountains shown in the custom spot colour. Acrobat displays the
contours and elevation numbers even if the Acrobat "Overprint preview"
option is *not* enabled.
When I import the PDF into
PDF into FrameMaker.
- The Imported Graphic Scaling dialog box isn't displayed as the
FrameMaker documentation says it will be.
- Nothing appears in the graphics frame; i.e., there is no preview.
- When I export into PDF format, the image appears but Acrobat 3D
doesn't recognize it as a 3D object
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D L Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 2:17 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Importing 3D PDF into FrameMaker
I'm trying to import a 3D file into FrameMaker and having no luck at
all. According to everything I've read
-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of D L Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 2:17 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Importing 3D PDF into FrameMaker
I'm trying to import a 3D file into FrameMaker and having
ing PDF into FrameMaker.
- The Imported Graphic Scaling dialog box isn't displayed as the
FrameMaker documentation says it will be.
- Nothing appears in the graphics frame; i.e., there is no preview.
- When I export into PDF format, the image appears but Acrobat 3D
doesn't recognize it as a 3D obj
Though nobody asked, I thought it would be a good idea to share a
solution I just received from an Adobe engineer regarding a problem
printing to PDF from FrameMaker 8.
The scenario: We had a document with multiple conditions. The document
printed OK for two of the conditions, but not the third
Though nobody asked, I thought it would be a good idea to share a
solution I just received from an Adobe engineer regarding a problem
printing to PDF from FrameMaker 8.
The scenario: We had a document with multiple conditions. The document
printed OK for two of the conditions, but not the third
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diane Gaskill
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:03 PM
To: Dov Isaacs; Diane Gaskill; Rick Quatro; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
Embedded graphics in Word do not come across with the text. In fact
@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
The issue is that embedded graphics in Frame is found by many people to not
be a useful way of working.
If you have a large number of documents which are going to be updated, and
their graphics will change, then using referenced files is much better
Hi Diane
On 1/16/07, Diane Gaskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have several FM plugins, but not TableCleaner Pro. I
forget, is that one of Bruce' Foster's apps or did Chris Despopulous write
it? I'll check the website and get it if needed.
I've never heard of TableCleaner Pro, and Google
Diane Gaskill wrote:
... but not TableCleaner Pro. I
forget, is that one of Bruce' Foster's apps or did Chris Despopulous write
it? I'll check the website and get it if needed.
Hi Diane,
I'm also worked with FM since 1994. I think the most of us worked with
FM over 8 to 10 years, so
om
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
Embedded graphics in Word do not come across with the text. In fact, most
RTF files with graphics in them crash the filter. It simily stops. After a
few seconds, it displays an error message about not being able to continue.
This happens with anything except
Diane Gaskill wrote:
> ... but not TableCleaner Pro. I
> forget, is that one of Bruce' Foster's apps or did Chris Despopulous write
> it? I'll check the website and get it if needed.
>
Hi Diane,
I'm also worked with FM since 1994. I think the most of us worked with
FM over 8 to 10 years,
You could/should be a bit more specific about what you mean
by Adobe fixing up the RTF to FM filter. If you are finding
bugs, by all means officially report them!
You should be aware that many of the RTF to anything else
conversion issues do relate to inconsistencies between how
Microsoft itself
--- Peter Ring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dov is of course correct in stating that PDF should
be considered a final form document format. But,
nevertheless, PDF can be used as an
input (to Frame)
===
Another effective way to use PDF as an input to
FrameMaker is to
and that helped a lot. But I assume we shouldn't have to do
that if the filter worked as it is supposed to.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:33 AM
To: Diane Gaskill; Rick Quatro; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Diane Gaskill
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 2:03 PM
To: Dov Isaacs; Diane Gaskill; Rick Quatro; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
Embedded graphics in Word do not come across with the text. In fact, most
RTF files with graphics
Dov is of course correct in stating that PDF should be considered a
final form document format. But, nevertheless, PDF can be used as an
input or intermediate format when converting legacy documents formats to
XML [1][2].
CambridgeDocs and Exegenix are used by many markup shops, not just for
You could/should be a bit more specific about what you mean
by Adobe "fixing up the RTF to FM filter." If you are finding
bugs, by all means officially report them!
You should be aware that many of the "RTF to anything else"
conversion issues do relate to inconsistencies between how
Microsoft
--- Peter Ring wrote:
> Dov is of course correct in stating that PDF should
> be considered a final form document format. But,
> nevertheless, PDF can be used as an
> input (to Frame)
===
Another effective way to use PDF as an input to
FrameMaker is to use it to
-bounces+bgagne=husky...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+bgagne=husky.ca at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
Diane Gaskill
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 2:03 PM
To: Dov Isaacs; Diane Gaskill; Rick Quatro; framers at FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
Embedded graphics in Word
(1) There are a lot of people within Adobe who
don't know what Dreamweaver or Contribute are either!
(2) Actually, there is NOT much demand for a PDF to
FrameMaker or even a PDF to InDesign converter at
least as expressed directly to Adobe. Most users of
these programs understand
to by Frame if they had an easy way to get there
from Word.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:55 AM
To: Rick Quatro; Diane Gaskill; framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
(1) There are a lot of people
(1) There are "a lot of people within Adobe" who
don't know what Dreamweaver or Contribute are either!
(2) Actually, there is NOT much demand for a PDF to
FrameMaker or even a PDF to InDesign "converter" at
least as expressed directly to Adobe. Most users of
these
to by Frame if they had an easy way to get there
from Word.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs [mailto:isa...@adobe.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:55 AM
To: Rick Quatro; Diane Gaskill; framers at FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: PDF to framemaker
(1) There are "a lot of p
It always puzzles me how companies make decisions. Adobe has included a
function within Acrobat to convert PDF to RTF, the file format of their
competitor, but not to FM which is one of their own file formats. Perhaps
there is not enough demand for PDF-FM?
Diane
snip
True... although
I am sure there are a lot of people within Adobe that don't know what
FrameMaker is.
Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing
585-659-8267
www.frameexpert.com
It always puzzles me how companies make decisions. Adobe has included a
function within Acrobat to convert PDF to RTF, the file format of their
It always puzzles me how companies make decisions. Adobe has included a
function within Acrobat to convert PDF to RTF, the file format of their
competitor, but not to FM which is one of their own file formats. Perhaps
there is not enough demand for PDF->FM?
Diane
True... although Recosoft
I am sure there are a lot of people within Adobe that don't know what
FrameMaker is.
Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing
585-659-8267
www.frameexpert.com
> It always puzzles me how companies make decisions. Adobe has included a
> function within Acrobat to convert PDF to RTF, the file format of
Hi, Steve.
Steve Rickaby wrote:
Same company does lots of other PDF-somethingelse converters, but sadly not
for FrameMaker... unsurprisingly. However, you might be able to use one of their
converters as a stepping stone, but I don't know whether it would give any
advantage over a save to RTF
At 15:06 -0500 11/1/07, Kenneth C. Benson wrote:
>PDF is mostly a one-way street. It's an end product. The text in a PDF is
>set line by line and page by page. Any method of converting PDF back to
>formatted text and graphics is going to involve a good deal of work and
>judgment. PDFs are complex
Hi, Steve.
Steve Rickaby wrote:
> Same company does lots of other PDF->somethingelse converters, but sadly not
> for FrameMaker... unsurprisingly. However, you might be able to use one of
> their converters as a stepping stone, but I don't know whether it would give
> any advantage over a save
PDF is mostly a one-way street. It's an end product. The text in a PDF is
set line by line and page by page. Any method of converting PDF back to
formatted text and graphics is going to involve a good deal of work and
judgment. PDFs are complex enough and generated from enough different source
Kenneth C. Benson wrote:
PDF is mostly a one-way street. It's an end product. The text in a PDF is
set line by line and page by page. Any method of converting PDF back to
formatted text and graphics is going to involve a good deal of work and
judgment. PDFs are complex enough and generated
Hello Framers
Could anyone guide me on any utility that converts pdf to Framemaker keeping
the layout and formatting intact.
I have been doing the same using the RTF option; but if anybody on the list
of some converter tool, that would be more then good. :)
Thanx for your help
Regards
Surbhi
PDF is mostly a one-way street. It's an end product. The text in a PDF is
set line by line and page by page. Any method of converting PDF back to
formatted text and graphics is going to involve a good deal of work and
judgment. PDFs are complex enough and generated from enough different source
Kenneth C. Benson wrote:
> PDF is mostly a one-way street. It's an end product. The text in a PDF is
> set line by line and page by page. Any method of converting PDF back to
> formatted text and graphics is going to involve a good deal of work and
> judgment. PDFs are complex enough and
To: Spreadbury, David
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
File and then Distilling eliminates all
a filename even though the link is internal in FrameMaker
7.0, 7.1 and 7.2, but only when Save as PDF was used. In the same
tests, the problem was not encountered even once when printing books to a
.ps file and then distilling to PDF.
Given this FrameMaker bug, we may have yet another reason
unces+dgcaller=earthlink.net at lists.frameusers.com]On
Behalf Of Bill Swallow
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:29 AM
To: Spreadbury, David
Cc: framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions o
t;causes bad links (even when the PDF is stand-alone, with no links pointing
>to it from other PDFs).
>
>Upon further examination, I was able to reproduce the creation of PDF
>links which use a filename even though the link is internal in FrameMaker
>7.0, 7.1 and 7.2, but
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL
of these problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m] On Behalf Of Paul Grigg
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using
as PDF.
HTH,
Chuck
Chuck Beck | Sr. Information Developer | Infor Global Solutions, Inc. |
Office: 614-523-7302 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
To: Paul Grigg; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
snipBut, in a nutshell
Now that we use Frame 7 we've never had problems with Saving as PDF.
--Doug
snipBut, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
I have not had issues since 7.0. I believe it to be finally fixed. But
yes, 6.x and earlier was
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As - PDF. We have 10
writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it
@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save
]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
___
You are currently
David...And I didn't just say it worked...I said it worked 100% of
the time without problems. In your experience, how is using Save As
- PDF, in version 7.x, problematic?
In version 7.x, what problems have you experienced?
--- Spreadbury, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never said it didn't
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
The information contained
ame 6 or 7--though I
*have* had problems "saving as PDF".
HTH,
Chuck
Chuck Beck | Sr. Information Developer | Infor Global Solutions, Inc. |
Office: 614-523-7302 | Charles.Beck at infor.com
-Original Message-
To: Paul Grigg; framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.co
Now that we use Frame 7 we've never had problems with Saving as PDF.
--Doug
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
> File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
> File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
I have not had issues since 7.0. I believe it to be finally fixed. But
yes, 6.x and earlier was
We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -> PDF. We have 10
writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it this way and we don't
have any problems with Save As -> PDF.
> > But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions
> > of FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada wrote:
> We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -> PDF. We have 10
> writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it this way and we
; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada wrote:
> We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -&g
Paul Grigg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
> over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
In FM 6, yup, a lot of disadvantages; somewhat fewer in later versions.
See http://www.microtype.com/FM_bugs.html
for the full story.
On Behalf
Of Paul Grigg
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 12:06 AM
To: framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distillin
David...And I didn't just say it worked...I said it worked 100% of
the time without problems. In your experience, how is using Save As
-> PDF, in version 7.x, problematic?
In version 7.x, what problems have you experienced?
--- "Spreadbury, David" wrote:
> I never said it didn't work, only
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:29 AM
To: Spreadbury, David
Cc: framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems.
Thanks to everyone who replied.
This was a small, one-time job so save as RTF was the best solution but
it's great to know there are other options.
Pat
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi -
FrameMaker 7, Windows 2000 Professional.
Does anyone know of a way to convert a PDF to FrameMaker? I'm not talking
about placing the PDF as a graphic image but actually converting it to live
text and graphics. The only thing I can think of is cut
expect as far as
formatting,
cross-refs and so on. But the gist of the info will be there.
Art
On 3/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi -
FrameMaker 7, Windows 2000 Professional.
Does anyone know of a way to convert a PDF to FrameMaker? I'm not talking
about placing
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
