On May 5, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
To summarize the feedback from the European time zone, I think that
the
proposal in general meets the favor of everyone.
The controversial issue is the exact version number to use for the
release. There seems to be broad support for
Since the new Plone 4 is looking like, essentially, a "transitional"
release, another possibility would be to pull its framework team
members from each of the currently-existing teams.
Eric
On May 7, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Let me ask what the level of enthusiasm is in the c
)
Eric
On May 8, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On May 8, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Eric Steele wrote:
Since the new Plone 4 is looking like, essentially, a
"transitional" release, another possibility would be to pull its
framework team members from e
Jon,
Thank you. It's an honor to serve, though I'll readily admit that I'm
still a tad freaked about the whole thing.
Now that our symposium is over, I can start to actually focus on what
we'll need to accomplish. This is the one and only Plone-related thing
I'm doing today -- my brain is
Alright folks... now that I'm officially official, it's time we sat
down and talked. I'd like to get some sort of phone/iChat/Skype
conference together.
We're never going to get 11 geographically-diverse people together at
the same time, but it'd be great to find something that works for th
On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 5 Jun 2009, at 03:56, Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
Based on the responses, generally folks are available Monday and
Tuesday at 2:00PM US/Eastern time. This works for me, how about
the rest?
Sure, shall we set a proper date then?
Matt
FWT!
A few notes as we start to spin up the Plone 4 process...
In contrast to the release-previously-known-as-Plone-4[1], this Plone
4 will be aggressive in its timeline, not its featureset. Though the
details still need to be worked out, I'd like to see a release by
December 1st, with at
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
...
I wrote a big reply to Matt, and ditched it. +100 to everything you
said. :)
I'd suggest that:
a) We now formally ask PLIP authors to write to the plone-dev list
(not this list!) announcing their PLIPs and
FWT!
We have a conference call scheduled for Tuesday, June 23 at 2PM EST
(1800 UTC). The Foundation Board has given me the go-ahead to try out
some different international conference calling solutions in an
attempt to avoid the Skype debacle that was our last meeting.
I've set up a meetin
Ok, so I promised a draft timeline before our meeting on Tuesday.
Here's what I've got:
- Aug 16 initial implementation
- Aug 30 first review due
- Sept 13 revisions due
- Sept 27 review of revisions / vote
- Oct 4 Alpha 1 release
- Oct 25 Beta 1 Release (or directly after the conference?)
- Dec
On Jun 22, 2009, at 6:31 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
Ok, so I promised a draft timeline before our meeting on Tuesday.
Here's what I've got:
- Aug 16 initial implementation
- Aug 30 first review due
- Sept 13 revisions due
On Jun 22, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
Hello all,
To confirm, are we meeting at 1800 UTC on #plone-framework tomorrow?
Matt
Matt,
We'll be attempting a phone conference in order to avoid the Skype
mess we had the last time. See http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/
Present:
- David Glick
- Alec Mitchell
- Ross Patterson
- Raphael Ritz
- Erik Rose
- Eric Steele
- Matthew Wilkes
Discussion:
* Eric needs a new headset.
* Haven't heard from Calvin lately. Eric will check in with him.
* We have 57 PLIPs to evaluate, more than any previous version of
On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
* Haven't heard from Calvin lately. Eric will check in with him.
Sorry for the radio silence, I'm even the one that suggested
Tuesdays at 2PM EDT :-) The last two mee
On Jun 24, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
All the 4.0 PLIPs now have plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org in the CC
list.
If you want to subscribe, visit:
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
Most were added in the last few minutes, so previous activity is not
in the
Alec has been kind enough to set up a Google spreadsheet for tracking
PLIP votes (hat tip also to Matt for suffering through the creation of
a Trac version that we dumped). It's publicly viewable at http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rR4UAIObeTZtdUExfYophHw
. Plone 4 FWT members should ha
Since I haven't received updated availability from everyone, we're
going to stick with our normal day and time (Tuesday, 18:00 UTC) for
this week's conference call.
This week's agenda: PLIPs.
Call details are at http://bit.ly/1akaCu
We're 58% of the way through the voting process. Let's get
On Jun 29, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
We're 58% of the way through the voting process. Let's get those
finished up!
Correction, we're 45% done. *prod* *prod*
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists
I'd asked him about this early on in the process, his response was
basically that he'd rather not and he looked forward to removing
everything we'd done when Plone 5 rolled around.
It wouldn't hurt to ask again, though.
Eric
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Erik Rose wrote:
It occurred to me d
On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
I'd asked him about this early on in the process, his response was
basically
that he'd rather not and he looked forward to removing everything
we'd done
when Plone
David,
I completely forgot to ask about your migration progress yesterday
during our meeting. Would you mind giving us a quick update on where
you stand? Any blockers that we could help you with?
Thanks,
Eric
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Frame
This week's meeting will be Wednesday, July 8 at 19:00 UTC. We have a
few outstanding PLIP matters to discuss. Are there other items for the
agenda?
Call info is at http://bit.ly/eTSg9.
Eric
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plo
Apologies for missing a few weeks of recaps. I'm going to start
volunteering people to do these...
Attending: David, Raphael, Eric, Erik, Alec, Ross
Short meeting this week. Work is getting started. We have at least 4
PLIPs being worked on at the moment. 5 weeks remaining.
Divvied up rem
I've asked Jens and Hedley to resubmit their archetypes.schematuning
PLIP as it was one of the more interesting ones from the old roadmap
that didn't make it into Trac. Please take a look at their proposal,
I'd like to get your opinions on this one. https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9376
E
Laurens sent me a document outlining how he plans to implement his
PLIP (#9305: Use real names instead of usernames) and asked that I
forward it along to the FWT to see if it meets your approval. I've
attached it to his ticket at https://dev.plone.org/plone/attachment/ticket/9305/Fullname%20p
On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David Glick
wrote:
A couple things I'd like to talk about:
* Upgrade policy. Currently Plone 3 supports migrations from Plone
<=
2.0.5. I was hoping to be able to do that for Plone 4 as well, but
there
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:26 PM, David Glick wrote:
...
* PLIP handoffs. What sort of info do we expect from PLIP authors
when they submit their PLIPs? For my 3.3 PLIPs I did a writeup like http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/PLIP_240_README.txt
...now that I'm i
FWT,
As previously noted, https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9310 has been
abandoned by the implementer due to time constraints. Given the
current state of the code and the scope of the proposal, we're not
going see this one completed for 4.0. I'd like to see if we can get
*something* int
Yes, sorry. I'd meant to send out an email detailing this procedure
for everyone. I'll be sure to do that shortly.
The FWT decided that a readme placed in the 4.0 buildout's plips
folder would be preferred. Bonus points for linking to it (or the
changeset that adds it) in your PLIP ticket.
FWT,
We have 3 PLIPs that are ready for review with quite a few more not
far behind.
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9259
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9263
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9264
I'll be keeping our spreadsheet (http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rR4UAIObeTZtdUE
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Geir Bækholt wrote:
In our work on the collections-PLIPs: #9283 and #9295
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9283
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9295
…we have found a need to persistently store configuration data. Our
options are:
1) either to write a new pers
On Aug 17, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
...
• A theme skeleton — plonetheme.sunburst — that Denys checked in
for me while I was flying across the Atlantic. Unfortunately this
is just a blank skeleton still, since I can't get Plone running at
the moment.
How does this relate to
The following 27 PLIPs have been indicated as being ready for review:
7822Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support
8801Move action icon support into actions, remove CMFActionIcons
8802Move our upgrade / migration infrastructure to GenericSetup
8808Require Python 2.5
Since we've only had 4 spots claimed today, I'll put all of this
another way... last one to get their 6 PLIPs picked has to review
David's Zope migration. :P
Eric
On Aug 17, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
The following 27 PLIPs have been indicated as being ready fo
FWT,
Just a reminder that we have a conference call Wednesday, August 19 at
19:00 UTC. We'll be divvying up the remaining PLIP review duties,
considering who else to bring in to help shoulder the load, and
reevaluating our timeline.
Don't forget to choose your PLIP review assignments at h
In the call: Eric Steele, Alec Mitchell, Ross Patterson, Erik Rose,
Laurence Rowe, David Glick
* We're really behind on reviews, unfortunately we'll have to add
another week. Eric will email the dev list to alert everyone of the
change.
* We need everyone to cover at least 8 r
Thanks so much for doing these Ross! These Plone 4 vs previous
versions comparisons are going to be great for marketing. I'll put out
a post touting our progress on Tuesday (was going to do it Friday, but
didn't want to see it swallowed up by the holiday weekend here in the
US).
One thing
On Sep 6, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
Eric Steele writes:
...
One thing we need to keep in mind with the PLIP comparisons is that
many of them haven't merged in changes to CMFPlone and other packages
since they did their initial branches so that may be one of the
factors in
FWT,
A reminder that the our deadline for PLIP reviews is this Wednesday.
We're still far short of having a suitable set of reviews.
Completed so far:
David Glick:5 of 7
Calvin HP: 0 of 6
Alec Mitchell: 5 of 6
Ross Patterson: 0 of 6
Raphael Ritz: 0 of 0?
Er
Ross Patterson
9311 Clean up of user related actions
UI Matthew Wilkes
9321 Reimplement the search form with an eye on usability Erik
Rose
9330Add ability to choose role when adding new site members Eric Steele
9352 Search
Attending: Eric Steele, Alec Mitchell, Ross Patterson, Erik Rose,
David Glick
Absent: Calvin HP, Laurence Rowe, Raphael Ritz, Matthew Wilkes
* Break deadlines into chunks. Some of these need more review than
others.
* Alec will pick up #9309. Ask Vincent Fretin to guest-review.
(Later
f any of other devs would like to assist the FWT in finishing up this
already-past-due review process, please contact me and I'll be happy
to get you started.
Thanks,
Eric
On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
Framework Team,
Friendly cajoling has not produced results, so
On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:43 PM, David Glick wrote:
Hello fellow team members.
I wanted to remind you all that our next meeting, when we can
hopefully make decisions on another round of PLIPs, is coming up in
about 40 hours. There are still many reviews outstanding (almost no
progress has
Correct. Please branch.
Eric
On Sep 17, 2009, at 2:14 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
That needs to throught the FWT at the very least. You can't just
change that markup structure without some approval process - this
can break every third party theme.
On 2009-9-17 08:04, Alexander Limi wrote:
Attending: Eric Steele, Alec Mitchell, Ross Patterson, Erik Rose,
Laurence Rowe, David Glick
Absent: Calvin HP, Raphael Ritz, Matthew Wilkes
#7822: Concerns over benchmarking results. http://weblion.psu.edu/static/loadtesting/plone4.0/diff_ReadOnly-20090916T_055113-plip7822-blob
Attending: Eric Steele, Erik Rose, Ross Patterson, Alec Mitchell,
David Glick
Absent: Calvin HP, Raphael Ritz, Matthew Wilkes, Laurence Rowe
Short meeting as everyone is still recovering from initial review
period.
• So what now?
• Eric's been preoccupied this week and d
FWT!,
It's final review time for 4.0. We currently have 6 PLIPs awaiting
final review and merge vote:
9186Set Image IDs from Title field
9259Group dashboards
9285Show blocked portlets in management interface
9263GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles
9272Expo
On Sep 24, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Eric Steele wrote:
FWT!,
It's final review time for 4.0. We currently have 6 PLIPs awaiting
final review and merge vote:
9186Set Image IDs from Title field
9259Group dashboards
9285Show blocked portlets in management inte
Following up on the discussion of including these in Plone 4...
The Framework team opinion is that they like them both, and will
include them in Plone 4, but with the reservation that they wished
they'd gone through a full PLIP process.
Personally, I'm in favor of including both. I've used
with the release descriptions there.
Eric Steele and Yours Truly have volunteered for this task, but we
didn't want to do it until 3.3 was out. Now it is, and the old
roadmap page can be retired.
I don't think we need to involve Mark and others in this particular
case — they
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:45 AM, Carsten Senger wrote:
Hi all,
--On Donnerstag, Oktober 01, 2009 09:13:01 +0200 Kim Chee leong
wrote:
Hello framework team,
Today is the final implementation deadline for the PLIPs. I'm working
on PLIP 9311 'Clean up user related actions'. I would like to request
FWT,
It's time to start voting on PLIPs again. We're looking for up or down
votes on each of the submissions.
The following PLIPs have updated reviews and are ready for your vote.
A reminder that we've agreed that we need a minimum of 5 votes for
each PLIP . Please record your vote in the
On Oct 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Takeshi Yamamoto wrote:
Hi,
Could you please add PLIP #9309 Better search for East Asian (multi-
byte) languages on the list?
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9309
Finally, we have fixed followings issues which were point out in the
first review.
- All monke
On Oct 2, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
The following PLIPs have updated reviews and are ready for your vote.
i think #9316 is missing from the list. i was running a bit late,
but granted an extra day (hope you remember :)), and
FWT!
Just a reminder that I'd really like to have all of your votes in by
tomorrow's meeting (same time, same place). We'll hammer out any
remaining voting questions and discuss what happens next.
Two PLIPs have passed the acceptance threshold:
9249Add TinyMCE as the default visual edit
Now that I have Erik's votes in (and, for the sake of time, have
decided to overrule Matthew's remaining votes on the remaining two
PLIPs in contention), we at last have a full list of accepted PLIPs:
7822Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support
8801Move action icon supp
On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Kees Hink wrote:
Merging the branch for PLIP 9310 into the 4.0 branch for CMFPlone, i
ran into a conflict i wasn't able to resolve: http://pastie.org/
652138 The bottom line is, 'svn resolve --accept working' doesn't
resolve that last conflict.
Does anyone know
Attending: Alec Mitchell,Ross Patterson, Eric Steele, David Glick
Absent: Erik Rose, Laurence Rowe, Matthew Wilkes
• Sprints we want to promote after the conference
• Add-on sprint:
• Make sure popular products are ready to ship with
Plone 4 ie
Attending: David Glick, Alec Mitchell,Ross Patterson, Eric Steele,
Erik Rose, Laurence Rowe, Matthew Wilkes
Absent: None
* Raphael and Calvin.
* Raphael has informed Eric that he'll have to leave the FWT
due to time constraints.
* Calvin has asked for a leave-of-absence
On Oct 16, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Kim Chee leong wrote:
Hi,
Just saw the FWT minute meetings and I would like to update you on
PLIP9311 status. Most of the work is done. What still needs to be done
are a part of the tests and according to the second review the
password form isn't working. I've got th
For those of you in Budapest, I'd like to try to get together for a
bit to
1) just actually meet you face-to-face
2) talk about which sprints we want to promote/run this weekend
3) buy you each a beer
Think we can make that work?
Eric
___
Framework-T
Gents,
I'd like to talk to you all tomorrow during our regular time. There
are a few final features being bandied about that we should discuss.
I'd also like to talk about the early release schedule.
Eric
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework
Since there's really nothing to discuss worth dragging everyone out of
their routines tomorrow, let's skip this week's meeting. I'll be
traveling next week, so I'm happy to skip that one as well. I'll touch
base on IRC in 2 weeks and see if there's reason for us to meet.
Eric
___
FWT!
After getting agreement from 50% of the team on IRC today, we'll just
forgo the remainder of our conference calls. If anyone feels the need
before 4.0 drops, we'll jump back into them.
Eric
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@list
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Heya.
>
> Some of us have been busy over the holiday season and worked a bit
> more on Plone 4. The next question now is:
>
> What is missing for a beta release?
>
> I'll allow myself to give my opinion on that. Eric feel free to
> disagree
On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
> Regarding the AJAX dialog problems, I just haven't gotten to those because of
> holiday busyness. I've watched them as they've come in, and they all look
> like they should be easily fixable. I'll make every effort to get to them
> soon!
>
> I'
FWT,
Back in December, I asked Kees to think about what would be involved in
modifying the two user preferences forms (prefs_user_details and
personalize_form) to function in a way similar to the new registration forms.
It seemed silly that we had this nice new, extensible way to add and remove
I've just finished getting the last bits of 4.0b1 to wherever they need to be.
I'll give it another 24 hours of soft-release before handing it over to the
installers folks to make sure everything is there. If I understand this whole
Plone process correctly (and I'm not at all sure I do), this me
Thanks, Jon! I'll take care of this tonight. :)
Eric
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Jon Stahl wrote:
> Bravo!
>
> Eric, can I suggest that you take the opportunity of the beta release
> to send out an email from "The Release Manager" to the wider Plone
> community in which you specifically remind
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
> Thanks, Jon! I'll take care of this tonight. :)
>
> Eric
On second thought, I'll hold off on this until we have installers available.
Eric___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-T
On Mar 15, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Nate Aune wrote:
> What about Amberjack for self-guided tours/help?
> http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9324
>
> Is that still on the roadmap for landing in Plone 4.1?
It certainly is if someone resubmits it. I asked the implementers to continue
developing it outsi
I'm finding that I'm consistently wrong about how I think whole Plone thing
works. Every assumption I had coming into this job has been met with some sort
of "No, we have a process. It's just not documented". Let's fix that.
I'm looking for some help in actually writing down the process of how a
It's my understanding that, traditionally, each (or at least most) incarnation
of the Framework Team included a UI-focused member who would weigh in on such
concerns during the PLIP review process. The 4.0 team did not include such a
person (which based on the number of PLIPs we had, probably sa
For those who haven't seen my message in plone-dev, we're pushing the deadline
for b3 back a week. Between the slight delay in starting the packaging and the
2 days of soft-release, b2 really hasn't had enough time in the wild to make a
difference. This will give us some extra time to wrap up th
So here's where we stand, from my viewpoint...
1) Plone 4.0 is feeling like a nearly-finished product (Great job, everyone!)
2) Everyone is getting sick of working on it
So let's get an RC1 on the schedule and get this thing out the door.
Despite our fine history of making big-name releases duri
I need to do some backtracking on my previous release plans...
First and foremost, I've completely overestimated the time I'd have available
this week. Preparing for next week's symposium has eaten all of my available
time and I'll be unable to cut a b4 beforehand. I absolutely hate being the
p
FWT!
I want to introduce two additions to the PLIP process that I'd like us to add
into the Plone 4.1 process.
UI:
I'm pleased to announce that Plone now (finally/once-again?) has a UI Team.
Alex will be heading up the effort alongside Geir Baekholt, Denys Mishunov,
Sisi Nutt, and Nathan Van
On May 22, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
...
> If you're interested or would like to nominate someone, please send an
> introductory note, explaining you or your nominee's interest and
> qualifications, to framework-t...@lists.plone.org. Postings from
> non-subscribers are rejected, so
I'd like to put in a nomination for Elizabeth Leddy for the 4.x Framework Team.
Elizabeth has been working with Plone for quite some time now, but only
recently popped up on the community radar at the 2009 conference. Her
"Unloading Plone" talk was hailed as a conference highlight. Since then s
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
> Congratulations, and thanks, to the members of the new Plone 4.x Framework
> Team:
> Alec Mitchell
> Ross Patterson
> Laurence Rowe
> Matthew Wilkes
> Martijn Pieters
> Rob Gietema
> Elizabeth Leddy
> Craig A. Haynal
Congratulations, all! I'm lo
(I believe everyone is signed up for the FWT list, but cc'ing Craig and
Elizabeth, just in case)
Once again, congratulations to all of our new and returning Framework Team
members! Now that 4.0 is nearing RC status, it's time for us to start talking
about the future.
I'd like to kick things o
On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
> (I believe everyone is signed up for the FWT list, but cc'ing Craig and
> Elizabeth, just in case)
>
> Once again, congratulations to all of our new and returning Framework Team
> members! Now that 4.0 is nearing RC status,
On Aug 1, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> This weekend, I worked on plone.uuid and plone.app.uuid, part of PLIP
> #10778 (which is now mostly implemented, by the way). These are both
> quite simple packages. Obviously, both have tests.
>
> When writing them, I wanted to use
Team,
We've got 30 PLIPs in for 4.1 already (http://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24),
so it's time to get together and start talking. Can I assume that next Tuesday
at 14:00 UTC will work, or should I set up another Doodle thing?
Everyone should be reading over the submitted PLIPs, asking questio
On Aug 13, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Ross Patterson wrote:
> Eric Steele writes:
>
>> We've got 30 PLIPs in for 4.1 already
>> (http://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24), so it's time to get together
>> and start talking. Can I assume that next Tuesday at 14:00 UTC will
&
* 30 PLIPs!
* Cover those PLIPs which were dependencies of other PLIPs first.
• 9473 (z3cform)
• Ross: Better than Archetypes at form generation, better
documentation than formlib, but still requires a lot of knowledge of the
internals to work with.
• (Sma
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>
> Reason why I insist on automated tests. Functional tests run too slowly
> to rely on developers running them regularly. We need to delegate to
> Hudson or buildbot.
I agree completely.
I very nearly* have a Hudson/Selenium Grid/plone
On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Le 19/08/10 18:14, Eric Steele a écrit :
>> On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>>>
>>> Reason why I insist on automated tests. Functional tests run too slowly
>>> to rely on develo
On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Le 19/08/10 22:44, Eric Steele a écrit :
>
>>
>> I wrote a new layer, mainly because I wanted to figure out how it all
>> worked. I've put up a quick screencast of the whole thing in action, if
>>
On Aug 24, 2010, at 5:05 PM, David Glick wrote:
> On 8/24/10 2:02 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:57 PM, David Glick
>> wrote:
>>
>>> - Scheduling
>>> - Final PLIP submission deadline is next Friday, Aug. 30
>>> - Six week PLIP implementation period beginning on th
On Aug 24, 2010, at 3:57 PM, David Glick wrote:
> - Present: all except Ross Patterson (excused). David Glick sat in to
> take minutes.
David,
Thanks for doing this. It made my week much easier.
Eric
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team
On Aug 24, 2010, at 3:57 PM, David Glick wrote:
>- Six week PLIP implementation period beginning on the submission
> deadline and ending Sept. 11
Just a note on the implementation deadline. That should be Oct 1. That'll give
everyone about 5.5 weeks to get their work in and we should be able
On Aug 24, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On 25 August 2010 04:57, David Glick wrote:
>> - 10804: Include workflow manager
>>- based on uwosh.northstar
>>- May need some input from the UI team to make it fit in with the
>> rest of Plone's UI
>
> Was this one accepted or rejecte
On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following are ready for review:
>
> https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9472 - plone.app.registry
> https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9473 - z3c.form
> https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10856 - plone.testing
> ...
Thanks Martin.
FWT!
A reminder that there are 5 PLIPs already in the review queue:
Include plone.app.registry https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9472
Include z3c.formhttps://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9473
Include plone.testing and plone.app.testing in KGS
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/1
Christian asked me to alert you to a new PLIP.
> Hello Framework Team,
>
> A PLIP titled "ARIA Landmark Roles for Accessibility" has been
> submitted for consideration at
> https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/11013. Best of luck with Plone 4.1!
___
Fram
Sorry for the delay getting these out.
• #10280 – Allow overriding the tag on a per-template basis
• How common of a need is this?
• Using the viewlet instead allows customization / view
• Decision: Declined
• #10964 – Asynchronousl
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
> • #11003 – Content governance metadata
> • Is this a common need?
> • Sounds useful, but are people actually going to use this?
> • Should be developed as an add-on
> • I
In attendance: Alec Mitchell, Craig Haynal, Elizabeth Leddy, Eric Steele, Rob
Gietema, Ross Patterson
* There's a meeting?
* Calliflower didn't send out notifications to several people.
* Eric will make sure to notify the list of upcoming meet
This PLIP came in before the deadline, but I missed getting it on our tally
sheet. Please have a look at it and we'll discuss it at next week's meeting.
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10987
Eric
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
