case of dd,
> causing a simple printf(3) to go to an unexpected location).
> —
> Devin
>
>
>> On Mar 4, 2017, at 8:12 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> Devin and I found this when we worked together. I think it was due to some
>> situation in dd(1) wh
Devin and I found this when we worked together. I think it was due to
some situation in dd(1) where short reads would exit pre-maturely,
however I may be mis-remembering. Devin, do you recall the specifics?
On 3/4/17 7:44 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
an interesting point to discuss? is our b
On 3/2/17 5:30 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
...
Even if that is the case file system cache effects should NOT be
visible to a userland process. This is NOT as if your running
2 different p
On 12/7/16 10:57 AM, K. Macy wrote:
A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install.
But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring no real
kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor
understanding of IPC by noisy commentators and a rel
On 9/11/16 6:38 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
hi,
For long we are planning to remove GNU rcs from base, after a failed attempt
before FreeBSD 10.0. Let see where we are to be able to remove it from FreeBSD
12.
GNU rcs is a GPLv2 software with newer version being GPLv3 preventing any
updates/f
Why is
+struct lock_delay_config {
+u_int initial;
+u_int step;
+u_int min;
+u_int max;
+};
missing comments for its members? Are they documented anywhere else?
-Alfred
On 7/31/16 5:41 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 01:49:28PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wro
On 7/18/16 4:15 PM, Matthew Macy wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:11:53 -0700 Alfred Perlstein
wrote
> I believe the
>
>
> On 7/6/16 9:34 PM, Matthew Macy wrote:
> > As a first step towards managing linux user space in a chrooted /compat/linux,
I believe the
On 7/6/16 9:34 PM, Matthew Macy wrote:
As a first step towards managing linux user space in a chrooted /compat/linux,
initially for i915 testing with intel gpu tools, later on to get widevine and steam
to work I'm trying to get apt to work. I've fixed a number of issues to date
It's too bad make(1) can't have a "max parallel jobs" for a particular
directory.
I believe that some of the llvm build winds up using nearly a gig of RAM
per compiled .c file, so when you are running 2 jobs at once, LLVM will
swap like mad.
If we could add something under the llvm directory
On 4/19/16 1:09 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
As far as I know, nobody is taking the source code or the Makefiles
away, so if somebody doesn't like the system being distributed with
pkg, they can very well roll their own.
It's nice to see the level of enthusiasm the FreeBSD project can
muster,
ge. Can anyone provide an argument
against (1) or, alternatively, for (2)? (2) seems to add a lot of
complexity for no clear gain and I remain pretty confused about why it
was chosen.
-Nathan
On 04/18/16 20:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Maybe what the "too many packages" folks need to do is
On 4/19/16 7:47 AM, dan_partelly wrote:
Look, take a look at history and the Linux kernel threads story and its
impact on FreeBSD. If you'd like I can talk about it.
Please, yes, I would love to hear about it.
Sure, so back in late 90s, ~1999 sometime after Solaris released kernel
threads L
On 4/19/16 7:39 AM, dan_partelly wrote:
What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked
by those unwilling to hash out the next steps.
-Alfred
While incremental steps forward are great, how do you avoid situations
like VNET, where a "good enough" enough implementatio
It is very important to understand that a packaged base is extremely
useful for those building any sort of distro or appliance distro.
So although the concept of "user serviceable" is important, it's not
just that. Such a change makes it easy for a distro or appliance making
to cherry pick up
next steps.
-Alfred
On 4/19/16 12:44 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 19/04/2016 5:29 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Guys please stop arguing about the number of packages. The high
granularity is VERY useful!
it's going to make us a laughing stock
"look FreeBSD just split into 1.43 million pa
Maybe what the "too many packages" folks need to do is write some code
to hide that it's so many packages.
:)
I think the rule of two feet should be applied here.
What we have is people that have worked quite hard to bring us something
that we can easily work with, and on the other hand some
Guys please stop arguing about the number of packages. The high
granularity is VERY useful!
Managing large groups of small packages is much easier than just having
large packages.
All this can be done by meta-packages which depend on larger package groups.
Later pkg can be augmented to "rem
Warner thank you very much.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>
>
On 4/14/16 3:42 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
The CAM I/O scheduler has been committed to current. This work is described
in https://people.freebsd.org/~imp/bsdcan2015/iosched-v3.pdf though the
default scheduler doesn't change the default (old) behavior.
One possible issue, however, is that it also e
On 2/12/16 12:50 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I don't recall seeing this one before:
FreeBSD critter.freebsd.dk 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #31 r293468: Sat
Jan 9 11:50:09 UTC 2016
r...@critter.freebsd.dk:/freebsd/obj/freebsd/svn_src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64
+taskqueue_drain with
This is going to be huge for FreeBSD. Thank you Glen, Bapt and I
believe Peter Wemm as well.
Having been engineering lead on multiple appliances based on FreeBSD
this is going to revolutionize and make life so much easier for future
appliance endeavors and general manageability of FreeBSD.
On 11/16/15 9:16 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-11-16 12:09, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
On 15/11/15 06:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at the new facility of dumping JSON,XML from many utils in base
and after some funny minutes, I couldn't stop ask myself “ Ok, this is funny ,
but
On 11/16/15 9:39 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
How big of a donor you are to the FreeBSD Foundation does not affect the
committable of your code. Having code ready to commit, vs just a vague
plan, does help your solution win out over another proposed solution though
Then surely you will salvage som
On 11/15/15 10:09 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-11-15 13:06, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Nov 15, 2015, at 09:51, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 15.11.2015 20:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 15 November 2015 at 09:10, Dan Partelly wrote:
Meaning, is that simple to push things in head , if somone does th
Lars,
Try to remove .git/gc.log then re-run fetch.
If that doesn't work then move ".git/refs/remotes/origin/HEAD" to backup
location outside of your .git directory and try again.
-Alfred
On 11/11/15 4:03 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
I just got this error when fetching from remote; related?
On 11/5/15 6:46 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
2015-11-04 18:57 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Spörlein :
The recent SVN update on the cluster broke svn2git in certain circumstances.
To fix this and make sure no content was dropped, the converter has
been stopped and we're working on bringing a fixed version o
Adrian the crash we are seeing here is very easily reproducible. Grab
our private ports repo and revert my most recent revert and build. It
appears to show up multiple times per day somehow in our configuration.
On 7/28/15 7:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 28 July 2015 at 16:09, David Wolfskill
On 5/14/15 2:23 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On May 14, 2015, at 1:06, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <20150514075316.gy37...@funkthat.com>, John-Mark Gurney writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote this message on Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:42 +:
In message <20150514072155.gt3
[[ reply private ]]
On 4/25/15 12:30 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 23 Apr 2015, at 00:12, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
While not as smooth as clicking a merge button in GitHub,
this is a valid way to accept patches submitted via GitHub pull requests,
and integrate them in our FreeBSD Subversion repo
Very cool. Glad it worked and thanks for the shout-out.
Hoping this can be automated some day.
On 4/22/15 4:12 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
Alfred Perlstein recently wrote this document for how to use
git-svn for interacting between the FreeBSD Subversion repo,
and the GitHub mirror of
On 4/2/15 6:53 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I hope this is not one more of those April fools :-)
I've been thinking that since Eitan's first post of
Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:55:11 -0700 (18:55 CEST)
"self-serve commit access"
I kept wondering what would kee
On 3/4/15 8:21 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 09:09:43 AM David Chisnall wrote:
Hopefully there's a lesson here that we can learn from: human-readable
formats do not make good intermediate representations when communicating
between tools.
I think this is actually an argum
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>> On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:32 AM, hiren panchasara
>>>> wro
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:32 AM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/02/15 at 07:33P, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>> Actually I want to shame third party ports into adopting libxo (or at least
>> providing mac
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> On 3/2/15 5:30 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02.03.2015 22:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>>>>
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>
>>
>> The responsibility is on you to provide something better, both the
>> architecture AND code. So if you want it backed out, then write something
>> better. Otherwise step back and let progress happen.
>
> As it seems you know a lot
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 5:37 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
>> On 03.03.2015 4:30, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02.03.2015 22:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>&g
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
>> On 02.03.2015 22:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> On 3/2/15 5:27 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3/2/15 4:14 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>>>> On 3/1/15 10:
On 3/2/15 4:57 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. we can/should do both.
Just make sure the json/html/xml output is versioned, otherwise you're
going to end up with /exactly the same problems/ you have with the
current format.
+1
-Alfred
___
freebsd-cur
On 3/2/15 2:53 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/2/15 5:25 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 3/2/15 4:25 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 2 Mar 2015, at 09:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
if we develop a suitable post processor with pluggable grammars, we
save a lot of work.
given enough examples you
On 3/2/15 4:14 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/1/15 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in base
is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or HTML without additio
On 3/2/15 4:25 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 2 Mar 2015, at 09:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
if we develop a suitable post processor with pluggable grammars, we save a lot
of work.
given enough examples you could almost have automatically generated grammars.
This decoupled approach is problemat
On 3/1/15 4:57 PM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
I like the idea behind this... where I'm running into difficulty is why
these bits of functionality need to be combined. What someone does with
ifconfig on the command line, versus what someone wants to know about
their network interfaces in an XML dump
On 3/1/15 4:29 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:11, David Chisnall wrote:
How would it be in a port? It involves modifying core utilities (some of
which, like ifconfig, rely on kernel APIs that change between releases) to emit
structured output. Maintaining two copies of each ut
On Feb 22, 2015, at 8:41 AM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:18:24 +1030
> Shane Ambler wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2015 01:22, RW wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:16:59 -0600
>>> Mike Karels wrote:
>>>
>>>
Trivia: the version of more on BSD systems actually is derived from
less, not
On 2/19/15 9:04 AM, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:16:55 -0800 Julian Elischer wrote
On 2/18/15 3:41 PM, Xin Li wrote:
The _only_ reason that I can think of is that more(1) does not clear
screen for certain terminals (done with 'ti' and 'te' sequences),
while less(1) when running as l
On 2/11/15 8:28 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:23:01PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 04:11 +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:56:00PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 22:21 -0500, Ed Maste wrote:
On 11 February 2015 at 21:3
On 2/5/15 11:00 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:48:54 AM John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 04:22:23 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:21:45AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 08:48:33 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
It's possible original intent of that construct was just a pause/throttle if it
used to be an if(). Makes sense although should investigate further.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:45:55AM -0800,
On 2/5/15 12:30 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:56:59AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
If you let bsdtar continue, and press control-T a few times, does the
user time (u) increase at all? Does it ever go any further, if you let
it run for a very long time?
I believe a
On Dec 14, 2014, at 6:52 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 10:32 +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> The rotating swirlie ('-/|\') in the loader accounts for a surprisingly
>> large part of our boot time on systems with slow-ish serial consoles.
>>
>> I think right now it takes a step
Up until a few months ago the following added to /etc/rc.conf would
blank the screen:
# /etc/rc.conf
saver="green"
allscreens_flags="-t 60"
Now that no longer works.
Can someone explain how to restore the power saving screen saver please?
It doesn't seem obvious from the docs or anything else
On 11/29/14, 7:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
It is now possible to use an external toolchain to build the kernel and base
(tested with gcc 4.9.1 and latest binutils)
Of course a lot of work is needed to make it build cleanly (aka lots of warning
to fix).
What have been tested so fa
On Nov 27, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get
On 11/17/14, 6:55 AM, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:55:16 -0800 Rui Paulo wrote
On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
suggest new tasks. Again i am
On 11/15/14, 11:56 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <5467af7a.2080...@mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
I resent your implications. Seriously I do.
There was no intent to be childish or anything as such.
Well, you were, and intentional or not, you're wasting
a he
On 11/15/14, 11:53 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:48:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 11/15/14, 11:42 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:39:33AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
This is really over the top.
It's not evangelism, the guy asked &quo
On 11/15/14, 11:51 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <5467adf7.1020...@mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
Nope. You showed some svn commands to not do it, you weren't explicit
in asking for ways to do it in svn, go ahead, look:
I didn't realize that the git-zea
On 11/15/14, 11:42 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:39:33AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
This is really over the top.
It's not evangelism, the guy asked "how do I do X?" I showed him how to
do it in a few simple steps.
The guy, that would be me, asked ho
On 11/15/14, 11:32 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 11:03 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 11/15/14, 11:01 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:56:50AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 11/15/14, 10:43 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Before I totally hose by /usr/src
On 11/15/14, 11:01 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:56:50AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 11/15/14, 10:43 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Before I totally hose by /usr/src directory, does anyone
have some guidelines on doing a binary search for a rogue
commit in /usr/src/sys
On 11/15/14, 10:52 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 07:46:09PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:43:32AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Before I totally hose by /usr/src directory, does anyone
have some guidelines on doing a binary search for a rogue
commit in /us
On 11/15/14, 10:43 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Before I totally hose by /usr/src directory, does anyone
have some guidelines on doing a binary search for a rogue
commit in /usr/src/sys?. Either cam or usb (or acpi?) has
broken the ability to remove a external USB device once it
is plugged into a usb
Craig this is really great. Thanks for doing this and thanks for the Jenkins
guys on giving a shout out!
On Oct 20, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, Kohsuke Kawaguchi, the lead developer of Jenkins,
> accepted my posting on the Jenkins blog, which describes
> how the Fre
On 10/8/14 11:53 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
This patch adds locking to scd(4) and marks it MPSAFE. It also uses bus_*()
instead of bus_space_*(). The patch is against HEAD but probably applies to 9
and 10 as well.
http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/scd_locking.patch
Note that this driver is
On 9/22/14 3:05 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 22 September 2014 13:46, Warner Losh wrote:
I have a dozen I can bring to the next bafug I go to :)
But, do you have the pentium class machines with ISA slots that we'd
need to use em? :P
I have the pci card to pccard bridge cards.
I'll bring thos
On 9/14/14, 3:22 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Alfred Perlstein <mailto:bri...@mu.org>> wrote:
On 9/13/14, 11:39 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Should really be a standalone package.
It's not exactly the same, but the lang/python2 port
On 9/13/14, 11:39 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/13/14 11:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
If adding an optional knob to the bash port which is OFF by default
to do
this is a no-go,
would having an optional port like what Brooks Davis mentioned be
allowed
which creates
the symlink and updates
On 9/12/14 3:23 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I could live with this solution of additional port outside of the main
bash port, which creates the symlink and updates /etc/shells.
One other thing I am seeing is that many, many shell scripts are
written assuming "#!/bin/bash".
Forcing all ups
The correct thing is to make a port/pkg that installs the symlink and
/etc/shells this for the user.
There is no need for changes to 'base' nor do we need a change to the
system port.
-Alfred
On 9/12/14 2:40 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:12:45PM -0700, Craig Rodri
On 8/20/14 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened w
On 7/18/14, 6:28 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-07-17 16:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install a
ged for long time, I would at least ask some things
about bhyve. I.e., I would rather first look at the locked prefix
emulation then at the tmpfs.
What about running the code with INVARIANTS + DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS and see if
anything shakes out?
-Alfred
--
Alfred Perlstein
On 5/30/14, 10:44 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:04:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
| On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:21:10 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
| > Hi!
| >
| > When system is writing a kernel core dump, it issues watchdog
| > pat wdog_kern_pat(WD_LASTVAL). If ipmi i
On 4/28/14 12:48 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I need to do the equivalent of "cd /usr/src/cddl/usr.sbin/dtrace;
make DESTDIR=/mumble all install"
but it pulls in libraries from the base system, which differ slightly
from those in the source tree.
How can I force it to use /mumble2/include and
On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion of
softwa
The file in question can be easily renamed, I think.
We definitely want to support untaring/zipping the code on Windows. Even
if not for cross compiling, just for convenience of use.
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On 2/19/14, 12:04 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19 February 2014 11:59, Alexander Motin wrote:
So if we're moving towards supporting (among others) a pcbgroup / RSS
hash style work load distribution across CPUs to minimise
per-connection lock contention, we really don't want the scheduler to
dec
On 12/13/13 1:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
I guess this may have been argued before, but I don't see why we would
want to hide specific things like: sys/kern/subr_lock.c
/* Check for double-init and zero object. */
KASSERT(!lock_initalized(lock), ("lock \"%s\" %p already initialized",
name
On 11/4/13, 2:41 AM, Colin Percival wrote:
Hi all,
After considerable review on freebsd-hackers (thanks dt71 and jilles!) I have
now added sysutils/panicmail to the FreeBSD ports tree. If you install this
and add
panicmail_enable="YES"
to your /etc/rc.conf, a panic report will be gener
On 10/23/13 11:11 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 23 October 2013 11:09, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Eh, having taken a stab at porting the bwl blob already, I would strongly
oppose removing NDIS. If you do that I will just stop using my netbook
with a Broadcom part altogether as I wouldn't be
S. If you do that I will just stop using my netbook
with a Broadcom part altogether as I wouldn't be able to use it to try to
test bwl changes. The NDIS thing is a bit hackish, but it is quite useful
for a lot of folks.
I have to agree. Deprecation
linux_sta.php
Have you looked at bwn(4)? It might just need an additional PCI ID.
-Nathan
I'm having no love with if_bwn. Any tips on making it work better?
I have -current as of ~2 weeks ago.
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current
ually retrying works.
--
Rui Paulo
I have a "device timeout" problem with urtwn as well, but I haven't had
time to hack the driver to self-reset itself. boo :(
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
On 10/9/13 7:20 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 07:17:11AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Only a few years ago you could take a dvd or memstick of FreeBSD and
have 1000s of packages to choose from during your install. That is
broken now?
memstick.img always had a minimal set
r memstick of FreeBSD and
have 1000s of packages to choose from during your install. That is
broken now?
Bummer.
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 10/8/13 11:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Alfred Perlstein <mailto:bri...@mu.org>>wrote:
On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl
On 10/8/13 10:41 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Alfred & cc current.
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 10/6/13 8:21 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I wrote Thu, 03 Oct 2013 23:28:43 +0200
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 2 Oct 2013, at 16:57, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi current@,
It seems I need if_urtwn dr
oops, sent from my non-subscribed email..
On 10/8/13 11:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Alfred Perlstein <mailto:bri...@mu.org>>wrote:
On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-
creen by default. and upgrades work. At the end of the day
I'm spending time doing work, not mucking about my workspace to make it
usable for development.
I think this was brought up at BSDCan in the discussion about making
FreeBSD a more featured development platform.
Speaking of
On 10/8/13 8:26 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Alfred Perlstein <mailto:bri...@mu.org>> wrote:
On 10/8/13 8:04 AM, sth...@nethelp.no <mailto:sth...@nethelp.no>
wrote:
I think the fact is that most direct u
te, git" why is that so manual for me? Why can't I
just register a package set somewhere so that all I have to type in is
"alfred.perlstein.devel" into a box during the installer and I get all
my packages by default?
--
Alfred Perlstein
_
big deal at all?
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
reeBSD (whether prudent or not).
That plus the age of the code is good enough reason to ditch it! huzzah!
Plus we can make RCSBSD along with it.
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
a non-starter. Our development systems will never be
connected to the internet for a ports upgrade. In this environment, in-base RCS is a
very useful tool.
___
How do you do your initial install?
ve a patch pending to add the usb identifier for this.
Is there someone I can provide debug information for to help resolve this?
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
csi configuration files?
We would love to quickly backport and ship this with FreeNAS as an
option for our users, having the config files be the same OR having a
very good converter would really make that much easier for us.
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On 8/24/13 10:47 AM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 24 Aug 2013, at 17:36, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
We should distinguish "lock contention" from "line contention". When acquiring a rwlock
on multiple CPUs concurrently, the cache lines used to implement the lock are con
On 8/24/13 9:33 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
You know, I could be a total jerk and say:
"If you push gcc out to a port, and you have the 'external compiler'
toolchain support working correctly enough to build with this, why don't we
just push clang out to a port, and be done with it?"
... just sayin
1 - 100 of 714 matches
Mail list logo
