-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 June 2003 14.21, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
>
> Get me a 3112 based controller on my desk :)
>
If this is an option, let me know what make and model you would need and I
will make sure we get a sponsor for such a controller from the sponsor o
It seems dave wrote:
> > It seems David Leimbach wrote:
> >> So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
> >> supported
> >> by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
> >>
> >> What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release
> >> ISOs
> >> th
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 08:53 AM, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems David Leimbach wrote:
So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
supported
by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release
ISOs
t
It seems David Leimbach wrote:
> So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
> supported
> by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
>
> What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release ISOs
> that
> will include drivers not included in the d
In the last episode (Jun 27), Szilveszter Adam said:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:39PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out
> > by default like most other programs that deal with binaries.
> >
> > If a.out does not exist, then you wil
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:39PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
> If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out by default
> like most other programs that deal with binaries.
>
> If a.out does not exist, then you will indeed see that.
Thanks for the clarification, I expected it
I think it may be related..
I saw this when I was sufferning from the other problemm
make sure you have the pmap fix and then re make buildworld/make
installworld when running on a new kernel and see if it goes away.
szia!
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002
* Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escriuréres
> > Everything works great with the fix.
>
> Which exposes another interesting problem.
>
> If I issue 'nm -v', it says:
>
> /usr/libexec/elf/nm: a.out: No such file or directory
If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.ou
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
:On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
:> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> > It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix
:> > (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.32
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
> I must admit that I have been less then tactful about this thread. I
> apologize for this. This is my last response to this because once again
> this has gone on far too long.
>
> As far as this response goes. I sense "selective reading." I never sa
Tony Johnson wrote:
>
> Since I am complaining then I need to figure out what U have done to make
> 5.0-CURRENT crash?? Well atleast U admit that U do not know and U do not
> care. So anyone who is using FreeBSD should also not care?? This is more
> screwed up then I thought and people @FreeBS
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 06:47:17PM -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
> It appears that I am not the only one who has seen this. Don't call this an
> unsubstantiated comment... It's not just me.
I didn't quote anything else of your message because this is the obvious problem:
No one questioned if you
manner. I know "I" didn't
break anything , as I do not alter /usr/src in any way.
This is definitly an election year...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerhard Sittig
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 21:45 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
>
> Since I am complaining then I need to figure out what U have
> done to make 5.0-CURRENT crash?? Well atleast U admit that U
> do not know and U do not care. So anyone who is using FreeBSD
> should also not care?? This is more screwed
* Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000928 03:34] wrote:
>
> Alfred,
>
>Just playing `devils advocate' here. But, in some initial
> install situations, exactly how is the user, even the most
> knowledgeable one, supposed to do much of anything if the
> install itself doesn't wo
* Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000928 17:54] wrote:
> I really did not want to reply to this but since some people believe that I
> am just see-ing things, then I will set this straight.
No we don't Tony, we aren't claiming any stability in -current,
I'm sure people will remeber your initial
> I will not provide comments as the below messages are already too messy.
> Remove my teflon cables... Hmmm... I'll try it but something tells me that
> this is like trying to shoot an arbitrary star in the midnight sky. FreeBSD
> doesn't like teflon or is it just my system???
I think there ha
On Thursday, 28 September 2000 at 21:45:13 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
> I will not provide comments as the below messages are already too
> messy.
It would be nice if you'd adhere to the conventions when you reply,
however. It's much easier to understand in chronological order. I've
now had to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I don't think this has much to to with the current situation: based on
> the evidence we have seen, it seems that Tony has tried to boot a
> release snapshot of -CURRENT. It failed. Coincidentally, he has also
> disabled IDE support in the belief th
homas David Rivers; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Thursday, 28 September 2000 at 19:54:01 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:33 AM, Thomas
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Thursday, 28 September 2000 at 19:54:01 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:33 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas David
Rivers
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
Alfred Perlste
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000927 18:26] wrote:
> > OK
> > Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
> > 12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
> > crash dump before any
* Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000927 18:26] wrote:
> OK
> Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
> 12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
> crash dump before any FS's are mounted or even before I tell FBSD where to
> p
OK
Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
crash dump before any FS's are mounted or even before I tell FBSD where to
put the crash dump, I'd really like to know this... I'd like to re
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Wednesday, 27 September 2000 at 19:07:17 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:48 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
>>> When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I g
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
>
> > When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a page fault 12 in kernel
> > mode. The problem seems to be because I have all my IDE devices turned
> off
> > in my bios. If this is the case, please undo this! That would be the
> > silliest reaso
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
> I don't believe the handbook covers "today's" 5.0-Current...
> Why would having no bustmastering DMA IDE disk contriollers on an all-scsi
> system cause a system to page fault from "today's" kern.flp && mfsroot.flp
> boot floppy.
>
> Try again...
No, y
al Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:48 PM
To: Tony Johnson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
> When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a page fault 12 in kernel
&
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
> When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a page fault 12 in kernel
> mode. The problem seems to be because I have all my IDE devices turned off
> in my bios. If this is the case, please undo this! That would be the
> silliest reason for a kernel
30 matches
Mail list logo
