Can anybody point me to a mailbox checker that works from a
desktop and watches (via network), the mail server? Until my
re-org, xbiff was sufficient. But no mo'.
thanks for any suggestions,
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org
and the mutt+IMAP stuff.)
Foolowing the advices of Girogos, you should be able to use mutt with
imap, I do, and it works quite well, the thing that I miss is
the abilitty to view the number of new mail an imap folder has when
swithching between folders using 'c' . Does anybody be able to do
, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's hopping that I'm still subscribed to the kde list, and that
somebody can answer these general mail-type questions.
You don't have to be subscribed to freebsd-kde to post.
Also, I would like some clues of how to if IF I can use mutt *with*
IMAP.
You can
Joe in MPLS wrote:
I've been running imap-UW on FreeBSD 6.x STABLE for a while. Clients
are mostly Thunderbird, TREOs and Horde (running on the same box.
I'm having issues when multiple clients try to access the same user's
mailbox. Typically the TREO will do a scheduled check for new mail
Chris Kottaridis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been using pop to download email messages. I'd like to switch to
imap.
My mail server is running FreeBSD 5.3
The imap executable is in /usr/local/libexec and inetd.conf is setup
right. I can telnet to port 143 I am talking to the imapd
I've been running imap-UW on FreeBSD 6.x STABLE for a while. Clients are
mostly Thunderbird, TREOs and Horde (running on the same box.
I'm having issues when multiple clients try to access the same user's
mailbox. Typically the TREO will do a scheduled check for new mail while
Thunderbird has
On Monday 31 December 2007 01:42:14 pm Joe in MPLS wrote:
I've been running imap-UW on FreeBSD 6.x STABLE for a while. Clients are
mostly Thunderbird, TREOs and Horde (running on the same box.
I'm having issues when multiple clients try to access the same user's
mailbox. Typically the TREO
of the UW imapd implementation.
Could it be the deadlock bug that's fixed in the latest release (2006k):
http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/RELNOTES.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
I have been using pop to download email messages. I'd like to switch to
imap.
My mail server is running FreeBSD 5.3
The imap executable is in /usr/local/libexec and inetd.conf is setup
right. I can telnet to port 143 I am talking to the imapd daemon.
However, I can't seem to get logged
-Original Message-
From: Matt LaPlante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 2:18 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Andrew Falanga; Rob; FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Suggestions please for what POP or IMAP servers to use
It's a chicken and egg problem
for what POP or IMAP servers to use
It's a chicken and egg problem.
There's nothing wrong with writing an extremely strict standard.
The issue is the implementation.
If your server implementation is so strict that most clients have
difficulty, then users will find something else
On December 14, 2007 at 11:25PM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[ snip ]
It is dangerous to put any webmail application on a mailserver
for a couple reasons. First it is possible for users of the
app (assuming the app has the ability to save mail) to overflow
directories on the mailserver.
please for what POP or IMAP servers to use
On Dec 13, 2007 10:06 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The developer is very adamant about writing dovecot strictly to
the letter of the IMAP specification. He's also discovered many
of the popular clients have bugs
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:06:25 -0800
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider also that the majority of webinterfaces to mailservers
are written using the uw-c-client imap libraries. So you go ahead
and install dovecot - then watch when you install a webinterface
the port manager
Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007 16:27:42 schrieb RW:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:06:25 -0800
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider also that the majority of webinterfaces to mailservers
are written using the uw-c-client imap libraries. So you go ahead
and install dovecot
is SquirrelMail?
SquirrelMail is a standards-based webmail package written in PHP. It includes
built-in pure PHP support for the IMAP and SMTP protocols, and all pages
render in pure HTML 4.0 (with no JavaScript required) for maximum
compatibility across browsers. It has very few requirements
On Dec 13, 2007 10:06 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The developer is very adamant about writing dovecot strictly to
the letter of the IMAP specification. He's also discovered many
of the popular clients have bugs, and are unable to work (or at
least have issues
-Original Message-
From: Heiko Wundram (Beenic) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:57 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Suggestions please for what POP or IMAP servers to use
Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007 23:14:32
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Falanga
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 7:35 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Rob; FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Suggestions please for what POP or IMAP servers to use
On Dec 13, 2007 10:06 PM
I'll 3rd it too, been using it for 2 years, amazing.
Daniel Bye wrote:
with sendmail for the MTA, but I've not used any servers that will
allow for
POP and IMAP. What in the ports would be good suggestions from those
here
who've used them?
dovecot is excellent - easy setup, stable
Daniel Bye wrote:
with sendmail for the MTA, but I've not used any servers that will allow for
POP and IMAP. What in the ports would be good suggestions from those here
who've used them?
dovecot is excellent - easy setup, stable and reliable, provides IMAP
I'll 2nd Dovecot. Been running
On Dec 13, 2007 9:27 AM, Monah Baki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll 3rd it too, been using it for 2 years, amazing.
Daniel Bye wrote:
with sendmail for the MTA, but I've not used any servers that will
allow for
POP and IMAP. What in the ports would be good suggestions from those
here
On December 13, 2007 at 11:40AM Andrew Falanga wrote:
[ snip ]
Second, how do programs like dovecot manage users? Does each user of the
e-mail system need to be a user of the FreeBSD system (installed locally)?
No, Dovecot can handle virtual users just fine. I use it in conjunction with
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:40:50AM -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote:
sounds like everyone is sold on dovecot. Great!. I've a few questions. I
went and looked it up on freshports.org and found the main web site. Can
anyone explain to me what problems they have with mail clients attaching?
See
On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:40:50AM -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote:
sounds like everyone is sold on dovecot. Great!. I've a few
questions. I
went and looked it up on freshports.org and found the main web
site. Can
anyone explain to me what
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on setting up a server for both WWW and e-mail. We're using
apache 2.2 w/PHP support (for phpWebSite) and for e-mail I'd like to stay
with sendmail for the MTA, but I've not used any servers that will allow for
POP and IMAP. What in the ports would
dovecot strictly to the letter of
the IMAP specification. He's also discovered many of the popular clients have
bugs, and are unable to work (or at least have issues) with an IMAP server that
goes purely by the rules.
He refused to break his software to work around bugs on the client side
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard Seibert
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 9:46 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Suggestions please for what POP or IMAP servers to use
On December 13, 2007 at 11:40AM Andrew
We run large mailservers with uw-imap quite well. uw-imap has no
problems dealing with 500MB mailboxes with 15,000 or more messages
in them.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Falanga
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:31 PM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:42 AM
To: Andrew Falanga
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Suggestions please for what POP or IMAP servers to use
Andrew Falanga wrote:
sounds like
Hi,
I'm working on setting up a server for both WWW and e-mail. We're using
apache 2.2 w/PHP support (for phpWebSite) and for e-mail I'd like to stay
with sendmail for the MTA, but I've not used any servers that will allow for
POP and IMAP. What in the ports would be good suggestions from those
for
POP and IMAP. What in the ports would be good suggestions from those here
who've used them?
dovecot is excellent - easy setup, stable and reliable, provides IMAP
and POP support and works well with e.g. squirrelmail. It's not as full
featured as the Cyrus or courier IMAP servers, but if you
On 11/1/07, Thomas Abthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try adding the following you /etc/make.conf
WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes # imap-uw
WITH_ENTOURAGE_BRAIN_DAMAGE=yes # imap-uw
On 01/11/2007, Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed imap-uw and saslauthd on my box. I'm
I just installed imap-uw and saslauthd on my box. I'm having trouble
getting it to accept plain text logins (in fact any logins at all).
I'm trying to authenticate people in the passwd file.
I get the following in the maillog:
Nov 1 11:14:53 myhost ipop3d[97953]: Unexpected client disconnect
Try adding the following you /etc/make.conf
WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes # imap-uw
WITH_ENTOURAGE_BRAIN_DAMAGE=yes # imap-uw
On 01/11/2007, Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed imap-uw and saslauthd on my box. I'm having trouble
getting it to accept plain text logins
Help please :I configured testing postfix,dovecot-IMAP ,postfixadmin ,
maia-mailguard ,squirrelmail in a production box(freeBSD-6.2), few issues when
I use squirrel mail.
by using postfix admin I created virtual domains and mailboxes for the
virtual domains , by using this I can log
dhaneshk k wrote:
Help please :I configured testing postfix,dovecot-IMAP ,postfixadmin ,
maia-mailguard ,squirrelmail in a production box(freeBSD-6.2), few issues when I
use squirrel mail.
by using postfix admin I created virtual domains and mailboxes for the virtual
domains , by using
I currently have self-signed certificates on our mail server, but they are now
expired.
I have just received the CA-crt back from thawte. I have the webmail portion
completed with installing the certificates, but I am having some issues with
getting them installed on SMTP.
I tried to put
brad davison wrote:
I currently have self-signed certificates on our mail server, but they are now
expired.
I have just received the CA-crt back from thawte. I have the webmail portion
completed with installing the certificates, but I am having some issues with
getting them installed on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Marcus
Clarke
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
Subject: Re: Upgrade to imap-uw 2006j Breaks Logins
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:50 -0500
As part of a portupgrade, one of my servers just picked up the latest
version of imap-uw (2006j). Now users can no longer login as imapd
claims they are providing incorrect passwords. I manually copied the
version I was using (2004g) to /usr/local/libexec/imapd, and all is
well, so
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:50 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
As part of a portupgrade, one of my servers just picked up the latest
version of imap-uw (2006j). Now users can no longer login as imapd
claims they are providing incorrect passwords. I manually copied the
version I was using (2004g
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 18:22:09 Bill Banks wrote:
When I try to login , in my maillog it saids no such file. How do I tell
it to use /etc/passwd
Which file is missing? I recently installed Courier-Imap on FreeBSD and some
file was missing but I don't recall which one. Make
sure
I'm trying to setup qmail with squirrelmail thus wu-imap on Freebsd
6.2 . imap is not authenticating the user and I dont know why.
Try:
telnet 216.236.255.45 143
a1 login test 0
and see what I'm talking about.
--
---
Bill Banks
auth method you are using?
I have some notes on installing Courier IMAP here:
http://rakhesh.net/mail/courier-imap.
That gives you the steps I followed while installing Courier IMAP on
my home machine.
HTH,
- Rakhesh
http://rakhesh.net
i think that it not validating the username passwd
--
---
Bill Banks 508-829-2005
Wachusett Programming Ourweb
http://www.ourweb.net
http://www.ourwebtemplates.com
Bill Banks wrote:
i think that it not validating the username passwd
Have you started courier-authdaemond in /usr/local/etc/rc.d? Added users
to UserDB or whatever auth method you are using?
I have some notes on installing Courier IMAP here:
http://rakhesh.net/mail/courier-imap
I had installed imap-uw port
# cd /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw
# make -DWITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT install
then i create a certificate with
# make cert
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
++
writing new private key to '/usr/local/certs/imapd.pem'
-
You are about
Worked like a charm!
Thanks!
(the self-signed thing is OK.. but there was no way I was going to show it
to the VP with the 'Domain Name Mismatch' error.)
From: Tommy Scheunemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: brad davison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: imap-uw / cclient SSL cert question
Date: Mon
I am running Freebsd 6.2-p6 with eGroupWare-1.2.106_1, dovecot-1.0.r2 and
mpd-3.18_5.
When I connect from home via vpn to the server then try to check mail thru
egroupware I get imap authentication errors. Anyone at work checking their mail
will also get the same error, kill the vpn
Does the IMAP protocol support storing the sent folder from thunderbird
and the local addressbook on the IMAP server? In case a computer
fails? I want to use dovecot or UW-IMAP instead of POP to protect my
users data and wanted a clearer idea of what would be kept/protected on
the IMAP
On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Does the IMAP protocol support storing the sent folder from
thunderbird and the local addressbook on the IMAP server? In case
a computer fails? I want to use dovecot or UW-IMAP instead of POP
to protect my users data and wanted a clearer
On Jul 16, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Does the IMAP protocol support storing the sent folder from
thunderbird and the local addressbook on the IMAP server? In case
a computer fails? I want to use dovecot or UW-IMAP instead of POP
- Original Message -
From: RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: help on picking an IMAP server
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:40:48 -0500
David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using imap-uw for some time
I have been using imap-uw for some time but now I would like to
have an imap server that can have subfolders. Out with imap-uw..
I tried dovecot but I was unable to get it to create subfolders,
although it seems some say you can, may people are having problems
doing so, and I didn't like
In response to David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have been using imap-uw for some time but now I would like to
have an imap server that can have subfolders. Out with imap-uw..
I tried dovecot but I was unable to get it to create subfolders,
although it seems some say you can, may people
David Banning wrote:
I have been using imap-uw for some time but now I would like to
have an imap server that can have subfolders. Out with imap-uw..
I tried dovecot but I was unable to get it to create subfolders,
although it seems some say you can, may people are having problems
doing so
You must have been doing something wrong. I have Dovecot in multiple
places and never had any trouble creating folders/subfolders.
I use Maildir format for my mail store, for multiple reasons that you
can research via Google if you're curious. Perhaps the Maildir support
is better than
Outlook - no go. How are you creating
the subfolders?
Just tried creating a subfolder on dovecot running on FreeBSD with
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 as a client. Worked perfectly. Using IMAPs
(secure IMAP) and Maildir. Dovecot was compiled/installed from ports.
Other system info:
~] dovecot
. Worked perfectly. Using IMAPs
(secure IMAP) and Maildir. Dovecot was compiled/installed from ports.
Other system info:
~] dovecot --version
1.0.rc24
~] uname -a
FreeBSD maru.leela.ws 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #6: Wed Feb 21
06:46:58 AKST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr
I have been using imap-uw for some time but now I would like to
have an imap server that can have subfolders. Out with imap-uw..
I tried dovecot but I was unable to get it to create subfolders,
although it seems some say you can, may people are having problems
doing so, and I didn't like
In response to David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You must have been doing something wrong. I have Dovecot in multiple
places and never had any trouble creating folders/subfolders.
I use Maildir format for my mail store, for multiple reasons that you
can research via Google if you're
On 2007/03/22 9:38, David Banning seems to have typed:
I have this in my dovecot.conf;
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
I am wondering if something like;
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir/:INBOX=mbox:/var/mail/%u
would work
I would check the dovecot
the problem was slashes / in the
existing Outlook directory names which imap does not allow.
here is my only problem now;
My incoming mail is still being directed to /var/mail in mbox format
- which is what I want, as most users are not imap.
but opening the imap inbox gives an error
was slashes / in the
existing Outlook directory names which imap does not allow.
here is my only problem now;
My incoming mail is still being directed to /var/mail in mbox format
- which is what I want, as most users are not imap.
but opening the imap inbox gives an error, presumably because
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:40:48 -0500
David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using imap-uw for some time but now I would like to
have an imap server that can have subfolders. Out with imap-uw..
I tried dovecot but I was unable to get it to create subfolders,
although it seems some
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
providing data recovery services etc...
people are allowed to be stupid. it's natural. no need to worry
Sometimes managing calendars and corporate schedules can be a pain in
the ass. I don't see how groups like Intel could do it any other way..
fortunately it's not
- Original Message -
From: Josh Tolbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: Outlook With FreeBSD IMAP
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:16:58AM -0800, [EMAIL
providing data recovery services etc...
people are allowed to be stupid. it's natural. no need to worry
Sometimes managing calendars and corporate schedules can be a pain in the
ass. I don't see how groups like Intel could do it any other way..
fortunately it's not my pain :) and i'm not
Outlook has some good features:
most important of them:
1) inability to work right with imap, for eg. when deleting mail.
2) inability to properly handle THEIR OWN FORMAT mail (these huge files in
which it keeps mail) when there is a lot of mail on disk. after shorter or
longer time
how usable Outlook is with IMAP.
The UW uses uw-imap (whatever the latest version is) because they
develop that mailserver.
As you say the U.W. would have a hard time using anything but uw-imap
(where do you thing the uw in uw-imap comes from :-).
use dovecot with Maildir. IMHO it's
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
use dovecot with Maildir. IMHO it's the best for mail service now. at
least for me
Does dovecont support shared forders?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tuesday February 27, 2007 at 08:56:19 (AM) Wojciech Puchar wrote:
fortunately it's not my pain :) and i'm not interested in groups like
Intel which naturally support windows and microsoft every place.
I think it could be more accurately stated that Intel, among others,
follow the money. I
fortunately it's not my pain :) and i'm not interested in groups like
Intel which naturally support windows and microsoft every place.
I think it could be more accurately stated that Intel, among others,
i think i was accurate in what i said :)
IMAP access to it. that's all, folders are
shared
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
use dovecot with Maildir. IMHO it's the best for mail service now. at
least for me
Does dovecont support shared forders?
what are shared folders? is it some standard or some M$-standard?
As in shared namespaces? I'm sure thats an IMAP standard, rather than
just an MS
an IMAP standard, rather than just
an MS thing?
Dovecot is brilliant also, especially with kqueue support now! Pretty sure
it does shared folders.
According to http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedFolders it does.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
I know this is a little bit of a tangent, but does anyone have a good
comprehensive command list, for testing an IMAP server via telnet?
Thanks,
Mikel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
I glad I didn't know that after dropping my last cell phone in
the crapper. The display was toast, but it was alive enough that
I could use iSync on my OS X box to grab all the phone info and
load it into my new phone. If I had known that
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Mikel King wrote:
I know this is a little bit of a tangent, but does anyone have a good
comprehensive command list, for testing an IMAP server via telnet?
I would think you should be able to use this:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3501.html
I use it when I need to get
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
how usable Outlook is with IMAP.
The UW uses uw-imap (whatever the latest version is) because they
develop that mailserver.
As you say the U.W. would have a hard time using anything but uw-imap
(where do you thing the uw in uw-imap comes from
I haven't looked at dovecot. Does it maintain a group of listeners,
similar to apache's, to handle incoming requests as courier-imap does?
you can set listening IP in config or *, not much more. if i do understand
your question. no such many options like apache.
So far we have had
As in shared namespaces? I'm sure thats an IMAP standard, rather than just
an MS thing?
Dovecot is brilliant also, especially with kqueue support now! Pretty sure
it does shared folders.
According to http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedFolders it does.
nice. actually i never needed this so
As in shared namespaces? I'm sure thats an IMAP standard, rather than just
an MS thing?
Dovecot is brilliant also, especially with kqueue support now! Pretty sure
it does shared folders.
it works fast with IMAP with Maildir folders having tens of thousands of
e-mails. don't ask me why i
On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Mikel King wrote:
I know this is a little bit of a tangent, but does anyone have a
good comprehensive command list, for testing an IMAP server via
telnet?
The UW IMAP tool kit contains a number of scriptable command lines
tools for talking to imap servers
How do I use the Cram-MD5 passwords with Outlook?
Or do I have to go plain text?
Off-topic for FreeBSD-Questions but I don't believe
Outlook supports CRAM-MD5 out of the box.
*Not* off-topic, the context being how best to configure Outlook
for use with FreeBSD IMAP. One hopes something
On 2/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Not* off-topic, the context being how best to configure Outlook
for use with FreeBSD IMAP. One hopes something more secure than
plain-text passwords can be made to work.
Uh, OK.
My answer is Don't use Outlook. For anything. Period
I am using the default FreeBSD IMAP server in FreeBSD. It works great with
what's the default FreeBSD IMAP server? i don't remember IMAP in base
FreeBSD distro?
thunderbird, but Outlook is not able to log in even though I have Secure
Authentication checked. Any ideas?
no idea
*Not* off-topic, the context being how best to configure Outlook
for use with FreeBSD IMAP. One hopes something more secure than
plain-text passwords can be made to work.
My answer is Don't use Outlook. For anything. Period.
as my answer. i have ca 500 users in my networks (mostly one
anyway - outlook doesn't work well anytime, especially with imap. simply
don't use it, thunderbird for windows works good with imap.
This is not as feasible as stated. Changing 500 users from Outlook to
something they have likely never seen is always a nightmare, even if the
subtleties
In response to Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
anyway - outlook doesn't work well anytime, especially with imap. simply
don't use it, thunderbird for windows works good with imap.
I've got to say, I don't know where this is coming from.
We have a menagerie of IMAP clients here
Steve Bertrand wrote:
anyway - outlook doesn't work well anytime, especially with imap.
simply don't use it, thunderbird for windows works good with imap.
This is not as feasible as stated. Changing 500 users from Outlook to
something they have likely never seen is always a nightmare, even
How do I use the Cram-MD5 passwords with Outlook?
Or do I have to go plain text?
Off-topic for FreeBSD-Questions but I don't believe
Outlook supports CRAM-MD5 out of the box.
*Not* off-topic, the context being how best to configure Outlook
for use with FreeBSD IMAP. One hopes something
best to configure Outlook
for use with FreeBSD IMAP. One hopes something more secure than
plain-text passwords can be made to work.
My answer is Don't use Outlook. For anything. Period.
but the OP may be stuck with it for some reason.
Thank You, if I was talking about Anna Nichole
--On Monday, February 26, 2007 21:55:45 +1300 Juha Saarinen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Not* off-topic, the context being how best to configure Outlook
for use with FreeBSD IMAP. One hopes something more secure than
plain-text passwords
I am using the default FreeBSD IMAP server in FreeBSD. It works great
with thunderbird, but Outlook is not able to log in even though I have
Secure Authentication checked. Any ideas?
one - what POP/IMAP server are you using?
two - some setups will require you to use the FULL email address
I am using the default FreeBSD IMAP server in FreeBSD. It works great
with thunderbird, but Outlook is not able to log in even though I have
Secure Authentication checked. Any ideas?
one - what POP/IMAP server are you using?
two - some setups will require you to use the FULL email
the extra features of on exchange server some place (shared
calendars etc), getting users to move away from Outhouse is a major
security improvement and reduces most of the email tech support calls.
Please note that Outhouse (and some other Windows IMAP clients) do
IMAP in a POPish way
On Feb 26, 2007, at 11:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to find out that Outlook does not support Cram-md5.
That is
the issue.
The question of using CRAM-MD5 over TLS can lead to holy wars. It is
still what in recommended by the UW IMAP team, but it has the
disadvantage
the extra features of on exchange server some place (shared calendars etc),
getting users to move away from Outhouse is a major security improvement and
reduces most of the email tech support calls.
i provide services for users, including mail services with IMAP access.
and i often help users
101 - 200 of 770 matches
Mail list logo
