ine,
> just the packets coming in through the monitoring port are being
> "ignored"...
Reply to myself, for the archives: the issue was resolved. While before
and including 5.2.1-RELEASE (and possibly in later releases as well, but
NOT in 6.3-RELEASE and 7.0-RELEASE) tcpdump displayed
Hello,
we've had a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE machine with four Intel 100/1000 NICs
(em(4)). The monitoring port of our HP 4140gl switch was hooked up to
one of the four NICs. This has allowed us to do traffic accounting and
detecting network problems by utilizing tcpdump. We've recently up
time
ftp://ftp3.de.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/5.2.1-RELEASE/5.2.1-RELEASE/packages/Latest/
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:41:31PM -0400, John Do
> wrote:
> > Here is what happens:
> >
> > pkg_add -r apache+m
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:41:31PM -0400, John Do wrote:
> Here is what happens:
>
> pkg_add -r apache+mod_ssl
> Error: FTP Unable to get
> ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/5.2.1-RELEASE/packages/Latest/apache+mod_ssl.tbz:
> Protocol error
&g
Here is what happens:
pkg_add -r apache+mod_ssl
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/5.2.1-RELEASE/packages/Latest/apache+mod_ssl.tbz:
Protocol error
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-rel
am using FreeBSD machine for compiling the below src, and FreeBSD version is
5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0:)
After Untar I noticed 11 CONFIGURE SCRIPTS and MAKE FILES , which
can be executed I have executed all the 11 CONFIGURE SCRIPTS and MAKE
files and explained u all the output for
Hi, I can't seem to find any docs beyond what's in the handbook about
how to set up pf with FreeBSD < 5.3.x
I've installed pf from ports ... but config(8) doesn't seem to recognize
the pf device entries at all.
Any pointers to docs/other resources for the hapless freebsd-pf n00b?
Thanks,
-John
Hello,
Has anyone been able to get the nvidia display drivers (6113) to work
on the ASUS A8V-Deluxe motherboard (K8T800-Pro chipset) in 32-bit mode
(5.2.1-RELEASE)? I have tried nvidia's internal GART support as well
as freebsd's, but the system hangs on starting X and requires a har
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:58:08 +, Peter Risdon wrote
> Jorn Argelo wrote:
> [snip]
> You really do need to read /usr/src/UPDATING and follow the
> instructions in the handbook.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
Sorry Peter, my bad. You're right, I nee
Jorn Argelo wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been trying to upgrade my 5.2.1-P9 server to 5.3, but when I try to build
the kernel it says:
ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
config version = 500012, version required = 500013
Make sure that /usr/src/usr.sbin/config is in sync
with your /usr/s
Hi folks,
I've been trying to upgrade my 5.2.1-P9 server to 5.3, but when I try to build
the kernel it says:
ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
config version = 500012, version required = 500013
Make sure that /usr/src/usr.sbin/config is in sync
with your /usr/src/sys and instal
Hi,
> Give pw the -m option to instruct it to mkdir the home directory.
Tnx!
That works a charm! No idea how I could have missed that one, guess I'd
better RTFM somewhat better than I did...:P
Cheers!
Olafo
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://l
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 03:37:24PM +0100, Olaf Greve wrote:
> pw useradd testusr -g testgrp -s /bin/sh
> No home directory gets created
Give pw the -m option to instruct it to mkdir the home directory.
- D.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://list
Hi guys,
I'm new to this list, so I hope I'm not flogging a dead horse here, but
after an upgrade from 5.1 Release to 5.2.1 Release (i386) I encountered
a weird thing: when being root, and creating users using the pw command
as follows:
pw useradd testusr -g testgrp -s /bin/sh
No home
Piotr Gnyp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Only the ones that are written in C++.
> > But it's probably easier to rebuild everything than to figure out
> > which ones include some C++ sources.
>
> Hmm the page mentions it when upgr
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Only the ones that are written in C++.
> But it's probably easier to rebuild everything than to figure out
> which ones include some C++ sources.
Hmm the page mentions it when upgradimg from 4.x:
"3 New Features:
[...]
GCC: The com
Piotr Gnyp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I`ve cvsuped 5.3 sources, done make buildworld and make buildkernel with no
> problems. But, on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/migration-guide.html
> i`ve read:
> "Due to the upgraded GCC compiler, C++ programs generally need to be
> recompiled
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:20:20 +0100, Piotr Gnyp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Due to the upgraded GCC compiler, C++ programs generally need to be
> recompiled and reinstalled. This requirement comes from changes in the C++
> ABI."
> My gcc version:
> Using built-in specs.
> Configured with: FreeBSD/
Hi,
I`ve cvsuped 5.3 sources, done make buildworld and make buildkernel with no
problems. But, on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/migration-guide.html
i`ve read:
"Due to the upgraded GCC compiler, C++ programs generally need to be
recompiled and reinstalled. This requirement comes from changes
I have cvsupped my /usr/src recently and doing make buildworld fails
with the below message. Please could someone help me.
This is my sup file:
*default host=cvsup.rucus.ru.ac.za
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
*default delete use-rel-suffix
src-all
An
Hi list,
All that was needed was upgrading the nvidia-driver. Worked after this :-)
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:28:15AM -, Hugo Silva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running into trouble trying to run the DooM3 beta on FreeBSD.
>
> Yesterday I installed the Doom3 client on 5.3(-BETA5) and the game
In the morning I chated with frends and the ask me about DOOM3 for linux.
System requirements for lynux ara 1GH and 256RAM
What is system requirements for FreeBDS.
should be the same.
BTW doom2 requires 486 & 8MB RAM. except high system requirements nothing
really was invented in doom3. as with mo
I am not a gamer.
In the morning I chated with frends and the ask me about DOOM3 for linux.
System requirements for lynux ara 1GH and 256RAM
What is system requirements for FreeBDS.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:28:15AM -, Hugo Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into trouble trying to run the DooM3 beta on FreeBSD.
Yesterday I installed the Doom3 client on 5.3(-BETA5) and the game runs
well AFAICT (played one or two levels). I quickly tested the install on
4.10 and 6.0 an
Hi,
I'm running into trouble trying to run the DooM3 beta on FreeBSD.
The screen will stay gray for awhile and then my resolution will be messed
up and the system mouseless (cursor won't move) - I can fix this by
running Return to Castle Wolfenstein which will give back mouse control
and reset re
Disregard my post/thread.
Found a typo in my /etc/dhclient.conf. Fixed it problem went away.
thx
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 10:53 pm, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure who to go to with this. I managed to get everything
> installed the way I like it on my Dell laptop... inc
Hello,
I'm not sure who to go to with this. I managed to get everything installed
the way I like it on my Dell laptop... including the miniPCI WLAN adapter
using the NDIS wrapper for Windows Drivers.
It appears to work flawlessly when I am within range of a WAP... but when I am
at the office
Did you cvsup with src-all ? If not then do it. Also can u just cat
/etc/make.conf ?
Regards
S.
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:17:29 +0300, salihin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> i have problem with my freebsd 5.2.1RELEASE , when i compile kernel using
> make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
> I
Dear all,
i have problem with my freebsd 5.2.1RELEASE , when i compile kernel using
make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
I got this error messages...
should i upgrade to 5.3. BETA RELEASE :( or upgrade to 5.2.1.STABLE
help me please,...
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Krauth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:20 PM
> > To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: 5.2.1-RELEASE eth
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Krauth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:20 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 5.2.1-RELEASE ethernet troubles
>
>
> I would have tried that but the PnP con
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Krauth
> > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:37 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: 5.2.1-RELEASE
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Krauth
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 5.2.1-RELEASE ethernet troubles
>
>
> I'm at wits end here trying to s
I'm at wits end here trying to setup a new Athlon64 machine with the
i386 release of 5.2.1-RELEASE. The problem is getting it to like a
network card of some sort; I've tried and failed with 4 so far:
1. Motherboard built-in NVidia gigethernet (Ok, didn't expect that
one to
I am trying to install 5.2.1 on an Intel S845WD1-E MB which has the Promise
PDC20267 Raid Controller on board.
I set up a mirror using two Seagate 160GB Hard Drives successfully. When I
try to install FreeBSD, it sees the mirror, disk 0 is ready but disk 1
shows down and then the mirror fails.
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 02:12, Ivan Fetch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've searched the mailing lists and found others with this issue, but
> haven't found a solution yet - can someone point me in the right direction
> please?
>
> When using an install.cfg
> also when KDE first starts up, although my "Starting
> KDE" system event sound is clearly cut short. Beyond
> that, no sound works either from X or from the
> console.
Just for fun, turn *OFF* the KDE sound effects.
Perhaps, just maybe, whatever sound effect is getting played has some kind
of
I've downgraded back to 4.10 and my problems have disapeared. I'm not
sure what has changed in the 5 series to cause these issues. A few
observations I've made though:
netstat -rn gives you a bunch of kvm_read error messages. Also the
output of netstat -rn is completely corrupt (the netif, use, and
Hello,
I've searched the mailing lists and found others with this issue, but
haven't found a solution yet - can someone point me in the right direction
please?
When using an install.cfg file with 5.2.1-RELEASE, I get:
Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s
Hey all,
I've been a FreeBSD user for servers for a very long
time (starting with 2.1-RELEASE) and recently decided
to give it a whirl for my work laptop workstation.
For the most part, everything is great.
However, after installing KDE 3.3.3 out of the ports
collection (from source, as 5.2.1 sh
AT/DIVERT Issues in 5.2.1 Release
>
> I've just completed a frustrating day of attempting to get nat working
> on 5.2.1 RELEASE. I've very familiar with using FreeBSD as a nat
> enabled Internet gateway, I have set this up on many machines with
> prior versions.
>
>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NAT/DIVERT Issues in 5.2.1 Release
I've just completed a frustrating day of attempting to get nat
working
on 5.2.1 RELEASE. I've very familiar with using FreeBSD as a nat
enabled Internet gateway, I have set this up on many machines with
prior versi
.
Regards
S.
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:57:44 -0600, Denis Lemire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just completed a frustrating day of attempting to get nat working
> on 5.2.1 RELEASE. I've very familiar with using FreeBSD as a nat
> enabled Internet gateway, I have set this
I've just completed a frustrating day of attempting to get nat working
on 5.2.1 RELEASE. I've very familiar with using FreeBSD as a nat
enabled Internet gateway, I have set this up on many machines with
prior versions.
I've compiled my kernel with the ip divert and firewall options
Go back to your old familiar drive configuration and do
one of the following:
1 - Install the FreeBSD boot loader on *both* hard
drives. Also be sure
to set the FreeBSD slice (a/k/a "partition" in
Windows-speak) bootable
during sysinstall.
During installation I did set the FreeBSD slice with
Are you sure it was ad2? If yes then you have fixed the drives on the
secondary controller. Even I made that mistake :-)
Regards
S.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:45:34 -0400, Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:58:23 +0200, "Marc van Woerkom"
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:58:23 +0200, "Marc van Woerkom"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >I use the FreeBSD boot manager which comes with the
> >system.
>
> Is there a difference between the one that sysinstall
> installs and the one in the tools directory of a
> installation cdrom?
>
> Anyway, I pu
I use the FreeBSD boot manager which comes with the
system.
Is there a difference between the one that sysinstall
installs and the one in the tools directory of a
installation cdrom?
Anyway, I put the 40GB drive as Master at the end of the
cable and the 2GB drive as Slave in the middle (everyth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 August 2004 10:13, Marc van Woerkom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to run both FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and Windows
> XP on one system and had no success yet.
I'm having FreeBSD 5.2.1-REL-p9, WinXP and Mandrake 10.0 o
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:08:42 +0200, Marc van Woerkom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Well FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 is running on my box with
> >Windiws XP in
> >dual boot. So the installation definitely works.
>
> Ok, that is already a good hint.
> What boot mana
Well FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 is running on my box with
Windiws XP in
dual boot. So the installation definitely works.
Ok, that is already a good hint.
What boot manager do you use for that dual boot system?
First of all, have u
fixed the master
drive at the end of the cable and the slave drive
Well FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 is running on my box with Windiws XP in
dual boot. So the installation definitely works. Now in your case
there may be a few posiblities. First of all, have u fixed the master
drive at the end of the cable and the slave drive in the middle
connector?. FreeBSD has been
Hello,
I am trying to run both FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and Windows
XP on one system and had no success yet.
The system is a rather old PIII-400 with one 4 GB IDE hard
disk (recognized by the BIOS) as master and one 40 GB IDE
hard (where I have to disable the BIOS recognition) as
slave hard disk
7;t know if the patches will apply cleanly, the latest I found were
for 5.2-CURRENT.
Does the patch for 5.2 works on 5.2.1-release-p9 ?
Regards,
Hugo
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
found were
for 5.2-CURRENT.
Does the patch for 5.2 works on 5.2.1-release-p9 ?
Regards,
Hugo
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
T and then my software, xorg,
gnome 2.6 etc. My questions is, everything ive
compiled was with gcc 3.4.x thats in -CURRENT if i
downgrade to 5.2.1 Release will this cause any
problems with the software i compiled with the newer
gcc. Reasons being for changing as i dont like being
that much on the ble
s looked so daunting, but when you break it
down into each step, it's not as hard as I thought it would
be. :)
I just finished the upgrade using the correct cvs tag. It
took three hours total, but seems to be up and running fine
now. Uname now shows:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9
Woo Hoo! It worked!
Scott, I'm sorry
the correct tag is
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2
- Original Message -
From: "Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ezequiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: Updating 5.
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote:
Scott wrote:
uname -a shows:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0:
I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to
be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest
revision is #9 or so? Do I ne
( No -- that's correct in spirit, but wrong
( in detail. Use tag=RELENG_5_2 for best
( results.
Ah, that would be what I did wrong then. I've reinstalled,
am currently installing cvsup from ports and when that is
done I'll try to update again with the correct tag this
time.
Thanks ag
> So if I set my cvs tag as Ezequiel (thank you) suggested:
> change: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
> to: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1
> That will get me the latest patches?
>
> I'll make that change and rebuild again today.
>
> Thanks all for your help. :)
> Scott
>
> ___
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:05:49AM -0500, Scott wrote:
> So if I set my cvs tag as Ezequiel (thank you) suggested:
> change: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
> to: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1
> That will get me the latest patches?
No -- that's correct in spirit, but wrong
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:01:34AM -0500, Scott wrote:
> Ok, I just did as suggested:
>
> ( Change this:
> ( *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
> (
> ( for this
> ( *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1
>
> and ran cvsup again.
>
> This time, I successfully and quick
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> So what is the diff between uname -r and uname -v, which produce for me
> :
>
> Uname -r : 5.2.1-RELEASE
> Uname -v : FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jun 14 14:52:08 CEST 2004
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr
Ok, I just did as suggested:
( Change this:
( *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE
(
( for this
( *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1
and ran cvsup again.
This time, I successfully and quickly deleted every thing
under /usr/src.
There must be something wrong with my
> Matthew Seaman
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote:
> > Scott wrote:
>
> > >uname -a shows:
> > >FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0:
> > >
> > >I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to
> >
( What the original poster was thinking of is
( the patchlevel that gets incremented every
( time a new security (or nowadays: errata)
( patch is applied to any of the -RELEASE
( branches. That modifies the OS name (ie.
( the output of 'uname -r')
That is exactly right Ma
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote:
> Scott wrote:
> >uname -a shows:
> >FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0:
> >
> >I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to
> >be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest
>
and seems to be running fine, but here's my
question:
uname -a shows:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0:
I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to
be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest
revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest
revision som
sday, July 29, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: Updating 5.2.1 Release #
Hi,
I completed my first update (upgrade?) of a 5.2.1 fresh
FreeBSD install. I followed a couple how-to's, the handbook,
and "Absolute BSD" as my guides. My machine is a 1.8Ghz AMD.
Here is my supfile:
*default host
be running fine, but here's my
question:
uname -a shows:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0:
I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to
be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest
revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest
revision somehow? Do I need
Hi Everyone,
I am having some issues with 5.2.1-RELEASE on an Intel SE7500WV2 with
an Intel SRCU42L Raid controller. The issue I have is the number of
interrupts per second being caught by the code for either the em or iir
device. The output of vmstat and top will show what I mean:
%vmstat -i
Previous post didn't get thru. So here is it again.
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:47:52PM -0500, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Came back from lunch, m/c didn't respond. Tried to reboot and got a paniced m/c.
>
> Panic message was "bad pte" with
> details of "TPTE at 0xbfc20550 is ZERO @ VA 0815
7;m sorry that you had to type it too.;)
> freebsd 5.2.1-release #0
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at
> 0xc0e1b000
> preloaded mfs_root "/boot/mfsroot" at 0xc0e1b0cc.
> time coutner "i8254" freq
hi,
it doesn't seam that today is my day :P
ive tried to install 5.2.1 on a machine and i get the
following error
(sorry i had to type it)
freebsd 5.2.1-release #0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at
0xc0e1b000
preloaded
Daniel Bye wrote:
> Hi all,
> Anyone out there had any luck getting the Linux version of Oracle
> 8.1.7.4 running on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9? I have found a few docs
on
> the 'Net that talk about installing earlier versions, and one
originally
> in Russian that talks specif
Hi all,
Anyone out there had any luck getting the Linux version of Oracle
8.1.7.4 running on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9? I have found a few docs on
the 'Net that talk about installing earlier versions, and one originally
in Russian that talks specifically about 8.1.7.4, but the only
transl
Dear FreeBSD-questions people,
Short desc.:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE doesnt see scsi disks, very early still at
bootloader, while FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE does.
Long:
Hardware being used is a Supermicro 6013P8 with a onboard Adaptec
AIC-7902 with an Adaptec 2015S raid module. The system has two internal
hi,
i got a strange problem with apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1.. while
installing it says:
mkdir /usr/local/libexec/apache2
/usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=
install cp mod_access.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/
grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_acces
Hey everyone,
I was wondering if anyone was having problems with ppp in 5.2.1 release
and if you have a way to fix it. Here is my problem.
I run ppp in ddial mode. I open a server/socket so that I can tweak it
without killing it or to check on its status. Just in case. I have
been doing this
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Andy Harrison wrote:
Hi,
first of all I have to correct my test results:
Not correct:
[...]
.bash_profile. If the alias is set in .cshrc:
alias vi vim
screen is running vim when typing vi (although the shell is still
bash).
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:47:26 +0200, Oliver Fuchs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using screen 4.00.01 on FREEBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE.
This is a total shot in the dark, but I wonder if this little section
of the manual might apply.
Invoked by r
Hi,
I am using screen 4.00.01 on FREEBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE.
Running the csh-shell everything works correctly inside screen.
But I have a user who is running the bash-shell.
Now this is happening:
Screen cannot read the .bash_profile unless I set the option in
.screenrc: shell -$SHELL
Hi All...
Ive been checking out the demo version of BRU (ftp.tolisgroup.com) for
Freebsd 5.x
However, whenever i install and run the application I continually get :
brufilter: [W010] "EOA": warning - block sequence error
label = server
bru: [E155] error - memory fault (SIGSEGV)
which is a Segment
The Belkin Bluetooth USB Adapter, model F8T001 (100 meter range), is not
in the hardware notes, I thought I'd mention it here:
I just installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 on a Dell Inspiron 8100. The Belkin
Bluetooth USB Adapter mentioned above was recognized as ubt0. Also,
'hccontrol -n ubt0hci inquiry' ret
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Senandung Mendonan wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
>
> > I have installed 5.2.1-RELEASE on my system (Athlon XP/nForce 2
> > Ultra/GeForce 3). Unfortunately, I am not able to use nVidia's fbsd
> > drivers. I saw a few posts
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
I have installed 5.2.1-RELEASE on my system (Athlon XP/nForce 2
Ultra/GeForce 3). Unfortunately, I am not able to use nVidia's fbsd
drivers. I saw a few posts that mentioned it would work under fbsd-5
although it was written for 4. Any idea on
Hi,
I have installed 5.2.1-RELEASE on my system (Athlon XP/nForce 2
Ultra/GeForce 3). Unfortunately, I am not able to use nVidia's fbsd drivers.
I saw a few posts that mentioned it would work under fbsd-5 although it was
written for 4. Any idea on what might be the problem?
The initial b
Tom Kiblin wrote:
Hello,
I am running a dual xeon with hyperthreading, SCSI system, that
constantly crashes under load. The box is doing about 40mbs of
transfer, and I get a panic with the following output on the screen:
http://advancedhosters.com/zico.JPG
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks,
Tom
___
Hello,
I am running a dual xeon with hyperthreading, SCSI system, that
constantly crashes under load. The box is doing about 40mbs of
transfer, and I get a panic with the following output on the screen:
http://advancedhosters.com/zico.JPG
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks,
Tom
___
Hello again ;)
Am Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2004 06:09 schrieb Lefteris Tsintjelis:
> >> Can this be done without problems or is it best to start with a
> >> fresh installation?
>
> > I tried that with 4.9 to 5.2.1-Release, just fine.
> > Read /usr/src/UPDATING*, ther
>> Can this be done without problems or is it best to start with a
>> fresh installation?
> I tried that with 4.9 to 5.2.1-Release, just fine.
> Read /usr/src/UPDATING*, there is a point about this. But then,
> updating to current, I shot my box ;(
I was affraid of that
Hi.
Am Dienstag, 18. Mai 2004 19:48 schrieb Lefteris Tsintjelis:
> Can this be done without problems or is it best to start with a
> fresh installation?
I tried that with 4.9 to 5.2.1-Release, just fine.
Read /usr/src/UPDATING*, there is a point about this. But then,
updating to curr
Hi,
Can this be done without problems or is it best to start with a fresh
installation?
Note: Machine has very few packages installed.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
Jeronimo Romero wrote:
>
>
> 1-Installed 5.2.1 release
> 2-installed Developer release (without X)
> 3-cvsuped ports tree
> 4-tried compiling gnome 2.6 meta port from ports
> it kept on failing at pango
>
> anybody have any ideas as to why???
Perhaps, if you shared
1-Installed 5.2.1 release
2-installed Developer release (without X)
3-cvsuped ports tree
4-tried compiling gnome 2.6 meta port from ports
it kept on failing at pango
anybody have any ideas as to why???
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Hello!
Yesterday I wrote:
> Earlier today, I wrote:
>
> > So, I'm trying to install 5.2.1 on IBM Netfinity 5000 and I'm not
> > having much luck. Before going into great technical detail (ha!) and
> > frustrating stories of my failures, I just thought to ask, is anyone
> > at all running this co
Hello!
Earlier today, I wrote:
> So, I'm trying to install 5.2.1 on IBM Netfinity 5000 and I'm not
> having much luck. Before going into great technical detail (ha!) and
> frustrating stories of my failures, I just thought to ask, is anyone
> at all running this combination successfully?
I can n
Disclaimer: I know that 5.2.1 is not a production release. However, I
can't use 4.x if I want to use IBM ServeRAID controller...
So, I'm trying to install 5.2.1 on IBM Netfinity 5000 and I'm not
having much luck. Before going into great technical detail (ha!) and
frustrating stories of my failu
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 19:40, Matt Anderson wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I had to run the upgrade script a few times and since I'm on dialup it
> took days but at last I have gnome 2.6 installed.
>
> I then went on and installed gnome2-fifth-toe from my updated ports
> collection. All seemed to g
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
