Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2020-02-06 Thread Mark Thomas
On 05/02/2020 09:52, Mark Thomas wrote: > The root cause of these errors is this: > https://support.sonatype.com/hc/en-us/articles/360041287334-Central-501-HTTPS-Required > > Maven central now requires https. > > I'm not sure how easy a fix this is going to be. Should be fixed now. The next

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2020-02-05 Thread Mark Thomas
The root cause of these errors is this: https://support.sonatype.com/hc/en-us/articles/360041287334-Central-501-HTTPS-Required Maven central now requires https. I'm not sure how easy a fix this is going to be. Mark On 19/01/2020 01:21, g...@gump-vm.apache.org wrote: > Dear Gumpmeisters, >

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2019-06-13 Thread Mark Thomas
FYI: The gump-vm instance (the new one) is taking a little over 6 hours for a complete run. I am currently starting some of the runs manually to try and get three runs a day rather than two. I will also take a look at the machine specs and the configuration of the long running Tomcat tests to see

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2018-04-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/04/18 20:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-04-22, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> I think I've fixed this. > > Don't forget to update the checked out copy on vmgump-vm3 (I forgot to > do so for hamcrest-library :-). All good on that one. I didn't know the packages were in svn. I added the JAR

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2018-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-04-22, Mark Thomas wrote: > I think I've fixed this. Don't forget to update the checked out copy on vmgump-vm3 (I forgot to do so for hamcrest-library :-). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2018-04-22 Thread Mark Thomas
I think I've fixed this. Sorry for the noise. Mark On 22/04/18 18:46, g...@vmgump-vm3.apache.org wrote: > Dear Gumpmeisters, > > The following 1 notifys should have been sent > > *** G U M P > [GUMP@vmgump-vm3]: Project

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2018-03-15 Thread Mark Thomas
There was an svn glitch overnight. Things should sort themselves out in the next run. Mark On 15/03/18 01:23, g...@vmgump-vm3.apache.org wrote: > Dear Gumpmeisters, > > The following 24 notifys should have been sent > > *** G

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2015-06-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/06/2015 01:31, g...@vmgump.apache.org wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 20 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [GUMP@vmgump]: Module apache-commons failed I've removed the broken externals caused by some

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2010-04-28 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dear Plutomeisters, g...@vmgump.apache.org wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [g...@vmgump]: Project portals-pluto-trunk-test (in module [portals-pluto-trunk) failed

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-11-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 5 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xstream (in module xstream) failed [snip] Tried to fix the descriptor... - Jörg

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-09-10 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 9, 2006, at 5:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following work was performed: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/jaxen/gump_work/update_jaxen.html Work Name: update_jaxen (Type: Update) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: Command Line: cvs -q -z3 - d :pserver:[EMAIL

Re: Important Change | Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-07-31 Thread Leo Simons
Gotta love this response: -[99ABF8] Leo Simons, Your ticket concerning 'Ticket: aanval.com mailconfig' has a new response. Message: System is operating as intended. Loop was already in place and prevented further damage past 10 messages. Ticket

Re: Important Change | Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-07-31 Thread Steve Loughran
Leo Simons wrote: Gotta love this response: -[99ABF8] Leo Simons, Your ticket concerning 'Ticket: aanval.com mailconfig' has a new response. Message: System is operating as intended. Loop was already in place and prevented further damage past 10

Re: Important Change | Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gotta love this response: Nice, really. --- Instruction: To respond, simply use the reply button within your email client. --- I like this part as well. I unsubscribed the Aanval address BTW. Stefan

Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-07-30 Thread general . support
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our new form based support ticket system. To submit for support or

Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-07-30 Thread general . support
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our new form based support ticket system. To submit for support or

RE: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-03-05 Thread Bill Barker
-Original Message- From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 3/5/2006 4:39 PM To: Gump code and data Subject: Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go... On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project junit (in module junit) failed

RE: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-03-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Bill Barker wrote on Monday, March 06, 2006 2:12 AM: -Original Message- From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 3/5/2006 4:39 PM To: Gump code and data Subject: Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go... On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-11-02 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:31 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Can you use a striplinebreaks filter reader in your loadfile task? Definitely. I hadn't thought of that. Checked in, should build tomorrow. Thanks again, Stefan! andrew

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-11-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This output, recorded to a file using the output attribute of an Ant exec task, is then read back in to a property using Ant's loadfile task. Ant diligently includes the newline as a part of the property read in from the file,

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-31 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 29, 2005, at 6:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I can't promise to find time to do more research No worries, I got it. :-) Most trivial idea: ${changenumber} expands to a value that ends with a new-line or a cariage-return new-line sequence. This guess is correct, and it turns out

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-31 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:12 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote: it turns out that it's a subversion problem, not an Ant or platform issue. The problem is that 'svnversion -n .' is returning a value that contains a newline when the directory whose version you are getting is 'exported,' when it should

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what I suspected, but any idea why Ant would do that on vmgump, but not elsewhere? I can't promise to find time to do more research Here's the first few lines of the manifest task: manifest

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-27 Thread Leo Simons
Hi andrew, Don't really understand the problem but I've put the db-derby dir from vmgump at http://vmgump.apache.org/derby-gump-snapshot.tgz please holler when we can remove it. cheers! Leo On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:11:01PM -0700, Andrew McIntyre wrote: Just noticed that this is still

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-27 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Leo Simons wrote: Hi andrew, Don't really understand the problem but I've put the db-derby dir from vmgump at http://vmgump.apache.org/derby-gump-snapshot.tgz please holler when we can remove it. I've got the file, so you can go ahead and remove it. Thanks

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just noticed that this is still failing. I am unable to reproduce the problem. At least on vmgump there is an empty line in smf.mf between Bundle-Version in the main section and Sealed: true. This line makes the Sealed attribute

Re: Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-26 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: At least on vmgump there is an empty line in smf.mf between Bundle-Version in the main section and Sealed: true. This line makes the Sealed attribute the first one of a new section, which in turn makes the manifest invalid. That's what I

Derby build (Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...)

2005-10-25 Thread Andrew McIntyre
Just noticed that this is still failing. I am unable to reproduce the problem. Please see my previous mail concerning this problem. It would appear on the surface to be an issue with how Ant generates the manifest file in the derbyjarwithoutosgi target. Is there any way that I can get access to

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-08-19 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On Aug 19, 2005, at 5:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: derbyjarwithoutosgi: [jar] Building jar: /x1/gump/public/workspace/db-derby/jars/ insane/derby.jar [jar] Manifest is invalid: Manifest sections should start with a Name attribute and not Sealed BUILD FAILED

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-08-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've attached a patch which updates the URLs (and adds repository/db-svn.xml), Didn't reach the list, but I think I managed to guess it. but I think someone is going to have to go to where the source is checked out on vmgump and

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-08-15 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On 8/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 11 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module db-derby success, but with warnings.

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-27 Thread Leo Simons
On 24-06-2005 15:25, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I look for module failures and even worse for module success but with warnings. The later usually means stuff has been moved in svn, we are now unable to check it

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, the algorithm I have in my head (come to apachecon! We can talk about it! :-)) I'll be there - and at the hackathon. Plenty of time to discuss it. would mean that a migrated project would be *-ed, ie built and linked against

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Does anyone ever do anything with the content of these messages? Yes, I look for module failures and even worse for module success but with warnings. The later usually means stuff has been moved in svn, we are now unable to check it out, but Gump doesn't consider it a failure. Stefan

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-24 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Does anyone ever do anything with the content of these messages? Yes, I look for module failures and even worse for module success but with warnings. The later usually means stuff has been moved in svn, we are now unable to check it out, but Gump doesn't consider it a failure. Want

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I look for module failures and even worse for module success but with warnings. The later usually means stuff has been moved in svn, we are now unable to check it out, but Gump doesn't consider it a failure. Want this to

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-23 Thread Leo Simons
Hi gang, Does anyone ever do anything with the content of these messages? I tend to use them as a gauge of gump ran and it sent e-mail, but as the actual content I would much rather have something like a list of failures/successes, i.e. a condensed version of log.html. Do you agree? Just

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-06-23 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
regards, Adam - Original Message - From: Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gump code and data general@gump.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:26 PM Subject: Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go... Hi gang, Does anyone ever do anything with the content of these messages

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-03-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: failed -ERROR- Synchronize Failed: Unicode Error. Can't copy ['spec1109ab\xe7d\xe9'] in [u'/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cvs/xml-xalan/test/tests/accept/spec11'] to [u'/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xalan/test/tests/accept/spec11']:

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-30 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
does this mean that you worked around log4j? On Nov 30, 2004, at 1:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 2 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module jakarta-velocity success [EMAIL

RE: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-26 Thread Eric Pugh
Hi all, I am a bit confused by this.. Is this message saying that the module level work, which I guess is checking out from CVS, worked properly, but then the build failed? I followed the link provided and everything says Success. Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-18 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 4 notifys should have been sent [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module lenya success, but with warnings. There is something wrong. Lenya is not successful at all! -- Stefano.

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-11-18 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 4 notifys should have been sent [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module lenya success, but with warnings. There is something wrong. Lenya is not successful at all! This stems from the old days when SF.net CVS was so flaky. Basically, if we

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-19 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module james-server success, but with warnings. this should be fixed (was looking in the wrong directory of the repository) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project txt2html-task (in module jakarta-servletapi-5) success, but with warnings. this is due to this line

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-19 Thread Peter Janes
Gump wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent Sorry folks, this run got away on me. Please go about your business, nothing to see here. :) -- Sometimes the Universe needs a change of perspective. --J. Michael Straczynski smime.p7s Description:

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead, I suggest that we take the prettyprinter.jar from the xdoclet CVS and make it into an installed package in Gump. Just create a project for it inside xdoclet's descriptor. Name it xdoclet-pretty or something. No need to

RE: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-14 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2004 06:59 To: Gump code and data Subject: Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go... On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:33, Niclas Hedhman wrote: I would suggest we mavenize xdoclet

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-14 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 14 October 2004 14:38, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead, I suggest that we take the prettyprinter.jar from the xdoclet CVS and make it into an installed package in Gump. Just create a project for it inside xdoclet's

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-14 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:33, Niclas Hedhman wrote: I would suggest we mavenize xdoclet and remove jrefactory and friends since they are clearly not enough friends of gump to live in the house with him. I will start on it straight away... IIUIC, Xdoclet is not yet

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-14 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead, I suggest that we take the prettyprinter.jar from the xdoclet CVS and make it into an installed package in Gump. Just create a project for it inside xdoclet's descriptor. Name it xdoclet-pretty or

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-13 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:33, Niclas Hedhman wrote: I would suggest we mavenize xdoclet and remove jrefactory and friends since they are clearly not enough friends of gump to live in the house with him. I will start on it straight away... IIUIC, Xdoclet is not yet Mavenized. They

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-13 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:17, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project findbugs (in module findbugs) failed [javac] Compiling 371 source files to /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/findbugs/build/classes [javac] javac: invalid target release:

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-08-23 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 11:45 AM 8/23/2004, you wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 13 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [snip] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty-plus failed *** G U M P [snip]

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-24 Thread Leo Simons
Stefan Bodewig wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mx4j/mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty failed The top item on my TODO list. A real API compatibility problem between mx4j and Axis. hehehe. It's high on mine too...I need jetty to build :D Another random thought: it would be nice to be able to annotate parts

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hehehe. It's high on mine too...I need jetty to build :D You can fall back to the packaged jetty for the time being. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tapestry is a problem in itself, since the Gump descriptor is inside the tapestry module. A manual nag together with a patch to the descriptor may help. Number two on my TODO list, helping hands welcome 8-) Actually it is number

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Adam Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we find a community e-mail address that would possible be willing to 'hear' these, and approach them? Difficult, the issues are too diverse. Let's look at them case by case [EMAIL PROTECTED]: webwork/webwork failed At least one

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-16 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:09 AM Subject: Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 6 nags should have been sent G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: webwork/webwork

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-16 Thread Nick Chalko
anywhere to be sent -- hence they return to the Gumpmeisters. I believe Nicola has plans for javasrc. regards Adam - Original Message - From: Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gump code and data [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:09 AM Subject: Re: BATCH: All dressed up

Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-06 Thread Leo Simons
this is a very cool feature. I just love all the intelligence that gump is developing lately! -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ Articles