Re: Cactus Eclipse Plugin page on website

2009-08-03 Thread Martin Cooper
, and I can't say which versions of Eclipse the binaries were built for. Since the source is available, though, you should be able to easily build it yourself if need be. -- Martin Cooper (Disclaimer - I have no affiliation with Cactus in any shape or form.) On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Re: Suggestion to use OpenGrok to index all Jakarta source code

2007-09-03 Thread Martin Cooper
as they are, with Cenqua doing the work, than I am to have us take on all the work just because we'd prefer the open source project. -- Martin Cooper On 9/3/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would FishEye serve the same purpose? * http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/ There is already

Moderators needed

2007-04-08 Thread Martin Cooper
of these lists. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection. Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd procedures? Not me. We don't have absurd procedures, so we're already

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection. Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd

Re: bugzilla administration

2007-03-10 Thread Martin Cooper
I've taken care of this. -- Martin Cooper On 3/10/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40577 How can I add new version to bugzilla? Who has admin rights on bugzilla? cheers -- Torsten

Re: [VOTE] Accept not yet commons ssl project WAS : Re: [Vote] Where should not-yet-commons-ssl go?

2007-02-24 Thread Martin Cooper
, with the whole of jakarta being able to work there) Agreed on these last three, with the proviso that they apply to whatever environment the project might land in after successful incubation, be it Jakarta or elsewhere. -- Martin Cooper Thoughts welcome... Mvgr, Martin

Re: [Vote] Where should not-yet-commons-ssl go?

2007-02-23 Thread Martin Cooper
to pass through incubation before this could happen anyway. [] Sandbox. The sandbox is open only to ASF committers. IIRC, you're not (yet) a committer. [+1] Full Incubator. +1. IMO this is the correct and appropriate path. -- Martin Cooper [-1] not-yet-commons-ssl is not a good project

Re: [VOTE] Accept not yet commons ssl project WAS : Re: [Vote] Where should not-yet-commons-ssl go?

2007-02-23 Thread Martin Cooper
. -- Martin Cooper Reasoning : 1) the first decides if Jakarta wants to sponsor this 2) we need to know the place it should end up in Jakarta (at least have some kind of direction) 3) if no one is interested in getting involved or being a mentor (preferably 3 mentors!), we can easily see

Re: [VOTE] Accept not yet commons ssl project WAS : Re: [Vote] Where should not-yet-commons-ssl go?

2007-02-23 Thread Martin Cooper
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that result the path full incubation / legal incubation is decided. So in my

Re: List moderator cleanup..

2007-02-18 Thread Martin Cooper
because gmail.com doesn't seem to work with the list moderation commands. Check out the thread with subject List Moderator Help please on infra@ from late January - sebb found ways to do this. -- Martin Cooper * * Hen On 2/18/07, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think people have

Re: PROPOSAL: commons-ssl - commons-sslutils?

2006-12-01 Thread Martin Cooper
is not determined until incubation has successfully completed. On the other hand, I think SSLUtils would be a fine name to run with. -- Martin Cooper Julius, Since what-some-day-might-become-commons-ssl is partially based on some little bits of code I wrote, you can safely add me to the initial list

Re: commons-fileupload: Streaming mode

2006-11-02 Thread Martin Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin Cooper Thanks, -dain On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:38 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: Our (Commons) nightly build machine (vmbuild.apache.org) was on a vmware zone that hasn't come back after the machine migration. It took care of both the nightly dist

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

2006-09-23 Thread Martin Cooper
is that something like Hadoop should not be part of Lucene, just as MINA should not be part of Directory. (I think) I understand how both of these happened, but still, it's something that a Velocity TLP would do well to bear in mind. -- Martin Cooper Just pushing everything top-level IMHO

Re: [PATCH]: site/vendors.xml/html

2006-09-06 Thread Martin Cooper
Hmm, are we OK with having companies naming themselves after ASF projects? -- Martin Cooper On 9/6/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Would it be possible to add Lucene Consulting to the Specialized Solution providers section on http://jakarta.apache.org/site/vendors.html

Re: Opening up the PMC

2006-08-19 Thread Martin Cooper
the community. -- Martin Cooper On 8/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Being on a PMC means two actionable things. Firstly, you get a binding vote; and secondly, you can subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - a list which should be pretty quiet (mostly it's just vote results now - would be nice

Re: unable to subsribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-06-09 Thread Martin Cooper
of 'jakarta.apache.org' now. -- Martin Cooper Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jakarta Commit access

2006-06-06 Thread Martin Cooper
. Fulcrum is part of the Apache Jakarta project. They are entirely separate, with entirely separate SVN access control. From what I can see, you are a committer to the Torque sub-project, but you are not a Jakarta committer. -- Martin Cooper Bye, Thomas

Re: [site] Copyright dates

2006-06-01 Thread Martin Cooper
could go back to what sebb was talking about in the first place, and use a boilerplate copyright on each page. -- Martin Cooper Once it's changed, I'll ping Cliff for confirmation. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Taglibs] svn messages not sent to taglibs-dev

2006-05-22 Thread Martin Cooper
with conferences, and backed up on my moderation duties. I just went through the taglibs queue, and moderated through the only commit I saw from you. Not sure what happened to any other ones. -- Martin Cooper -- Kris Schneider mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D.O.Tech http://www.dotech.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tiles as the seed for Jakarta Web Components

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
believe that concensus on the gist of such a scope has already happened, between the lines, in the numerous previous threads on JWC on various lists. -- Martin Cooper -Andy James Mitchell wrote: I believe that this would be a great way to bootstrap this new community. If this were a formal

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tiles as the seed for Jakarta Web Components

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
be java components developed primarily for use in the development of web applications. That's a good start. I'm not sure it's enough, but we could start from there. -- Martin Cooper On 4/24/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There has been considerable discussion, on this list and others

[PROPOSAL] Tiles as the seed for Jakarta Web Components

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Cooper
, and potentially other Jakarta sub-projects, as to whether or not they choose to join the new sub-project. The goal of this proposal is simply to seed the sub-project and get the ball rolling. Comments? -- Martin Cooper [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/struts-tiles/

Re: [VOTE] Jakarta Sandbox

2006-04-10 Thread Martin Cooper
would be counter to that goal. On the other hand, if it graduates to somewhere outside of Jakarta, why is the sandbox inside of Jakarta? -- Martin Cooper jakarta's scope is the problem but it's hard to fix for both historic and community reasons - robert

Re: [VOTE] Jakarta Sandbox

2006-04-10 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/10/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/10/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:31 -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Yes. A lot of things predate the incubator. I'm not opposed to say

Re: [VOTE] Jakarta Sandbox

2006-04-07 Thread Martin Cooper
. -- Martin Cooper Vote to last no shorter than a week. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: party@ for users?

2006-03-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/28/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I would like to know if it is allowed for users to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] AFAIK that list is open to ASF committers only. -- Martin Cooper (So that I can stop from posting to the user lists ;-) ) Ciao, Mario

Re: OneCommunityProposals - thoughts?

2006-03-22 Thread Martin Cooper
reversible steps instead of huge ones. So ours (something becoming a TLP) may not be easily reversible, but I'd like to keep them small and gradual where possible, especially given no additional benefit from doing things at once. +1. I read Stefano's post too, and agree wholeheartedly. -- Martin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Cleanup pmc members

2006-03-16 Thread Martin Cooper
not sure that there is one, though.) -- Martin Cooper My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list will result in removal from the PMC. If it goes well we could consider doing it periodically

Re: [PROPOSAL] Cleanup pmc members

2006-03-16 Thread Martin Cooper
, is that someone coming back from a long vacation loses their binding vote on any vote that closes within that 72 hour period. -- Martin Cooper Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: adding a link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons?

2006-03-14 Thread Martin Cooper
a little push back. That space was also the realm of Apache Commons when it existed. -- Martin Cooper It's the convention that you use your domain as your package. The Jakarta Commons code is in the package org.apache.commons, not org.apache.jakarta.commons. Also a number of times I've seen s

Re: Other Jakarta Components

2006-03-12 Thread Martin Cooper
community where they also share lists, I am very unlikely to sign up for those lists just to keep tabs on those components. Maybe the developers will move, but how much of the community will go with them? -- Martin Cooper We're only going to end up with a Jakarta XML Components at this rate; which

Re: Other Jakarta Components

2006-03-12 Thread Martin Cooper
, Digester and JXPath strike me as a bit more to swallow and XML might not want to taking such bites. You want to go ahead and ask them? Martin Cooper wrote: I think this whole thing is putting the cart before the horse. You're in the process of destroying Commons, not just dismantling

Re: Jakarta Web Components

2006-03-06 Thread Martin Cooper
on the Mailer taglib, but abandoned it when someone else decided to reinvent that as a Mailer2 taglib. That now appears to have been abandoned as well, and never made it out of the Taglibs sandbox. So I'm not sure which, if either, would go to JWC. -- Martin Cooper Then there is the question

Re: Subproject Charters

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
Prolog constraint framework decided it wanted to be part of Commons. Where would you point them to explain that that's not what Commons is about? -- Martin Cooper Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two community proposals

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
. The votes should stay on the relevant developer list. -- Martin Cooper - Comments? The only negative I have for 1) is that I like to use the commit lists to see who is on which subproject (for 3 PMC member oversight checking

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
of the subproject site, which is backwards to me. -- Martin Cooper What labels should we use? I suggest: * Delete Alexandria. It's at the same level as the java-* CVS stuff, ancient history to be forgotten. * ECS, ORO, Regexp to be moved to a label of Inactive. * Others to be raised as questions

Re: Subproject Charters

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I notice that Commons and HTTP Components both have charters. Other subprojects may have them and I've just missed in my very quick look

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two community proposals

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
code, bugfixes etc and would promote non-code issues up to the general mailing list. Great idea! Then I can unsub from general@ and avoid all the navel-gazing! :-) -- Martin Cooper Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really shouldn't be sending multiple emails at the same time - you'll all jsut end up replying to one of them. However, itching while

Re: Subproject Charters

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why restrict a project? One of your big things right now - order and organisation. ;-) Guess I don't see this as one that needs

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
and would completely fit their needs. Marking a component as 'inactive' would then be the final nail in its coffin. -- Martin Cooper Yoav -- Yoav Shapira Senior Architect Nimalex LLC 1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310 Cambridge, MA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All (90%?) of the navel gazing comes down to one binary question. Should Jakarta be a community, or a community of communities. Are we Jakarta

Re: One community or many

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
sense to take the group of components related to extending the Java language and form Jakarta Language Components out of that. The end result will be smaller, more cohesive, more vibrant communities than we have today. It's hard to imagine why that would be a bad thing! -- Martin Cooper At some

Re: jakarta struts binary

2006-02-08 Thread Martin Cooper
, which is Struts 1.2.8. You can find that on the Struts downloads page, here: http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html For documentation, you'll want the corresponding release web site, here: http://struts.apache.org//struts-doc-1.2.8/index.html Hope that helps. -- Martin Cooper

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin Cooper
the PMC by a 3/4 vote of the PMC. Of course, we only have 60% active right now, so presuming only committers to the current Jakarta voted, that line of the charter would be impossible. What, you think we're going to let you off the hook as PMC Chair any time soon? Ha ha ha! ;-) -- Martin

Re: Notice of intent.... #2

2006-01-10 Thread Martin Cooper
of other mailing lists, but it also, at least, partially condemns sandbox components to death, by limiting their exposure much more than now. And if everyone has to subscribe to the sandbox list anyway, to know what's happening, then a separate list is of limited utility. -- Martin Cooper

Re: multipart/form-java

2005-12-27 Thread Martin Cooper
package, so that you don't get tangled up in the strange licensing conditions of the O'Reilly package. See: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/fileupload/ -- Martin Cooper On 12/27/05, Lamberto Altieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I have a problem! I must send a post multipart/form-data

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-24 Thread Martin Cooper
it clear that it is intended for use on the client side _of the protocol_, since many people are using HttpClient on the server side today, but as a client to other servers. -- Martin Cooper Targeted specifications and standards: = * RFC1945 Hypertext

Re: GMANE

2005-09-01 Thread Martin Cooper
to be another Gmane, and there are probably others. I'm not sure we want to be keeping pointers to all of them, and we shouldn't be picking favourites. ;-) -- Martin Cooper 4. emails for lists don't go into my mailbox; I don't want them there (I prefer NNTP) I think a mention of GMANE on Jakarta would

Re: Web Components/Common project

2005-08-09 Thread Martin Cooper
still leave us with quite a few options to choose among. -- Martin Cooper -Rahul While it would be nice, I doubt this is going to be unanimous. Unless there are other suggestions, or someone else beats me to it, I will call a vote in 24 hours. I plan to keep it simple, mark X before

Re: Tracking commons component liveliness

2005-07-27 Thread Martin Cooper
, this is a huge problem already, and I'd be -1 to anything that's going to further exacerbate it. -- Martin Cooper People would be expected to regularly (as often as they like but at least every 3 months) go to the page and update the date next to their name for projects they still are actively

Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer

2005-07-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received?? Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's was not amongst them. You might want to ask him to fax it again, in case it got lost somehow. -- Martin Cooper

Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer

2005-07-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:49 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received?? Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's was not amongst

Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer

2005-07-10 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether it has been received/processed? I just checked, and it has not yet been recorded. I'll keep an eye out for it, though. -- Martin Cooper Thanks, Simon On Sat

Re: [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-03 Thread Martin Cooper
+1 -- Martin Cooper On 7/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 to drop this Phil robert burrell donkin wrote: 8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper. doesn't seem very relevant

Re: sandbox [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-02 Thread Martin Cooper
has more benefits than downsides. +1 -- Martin Cooper Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [POLL] drop point 12 [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-02 Thread Martin Cooper
didn't work for commons, no reason to expect it will here. +1. Let's ditch it. -- Martin Cooper Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-02 Thread Martin Cooper
that this will be the arrangement. opinions? +1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la Jakarta Commons. -- Martin Cooper - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: new components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-02 Thread Martin Cooper
would be yes, because 15 relates only to the proposal, while 19 relates to the component as it exists, and is developed, within the subproject. -- Martin Cooper - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications

2005-06-22 Thread Martin Cooper
. (Frank, I am *not* trying to shut you out. I'm simply trying to get the new subproject off the ground without complicating things by discussing external elements prematurely.) -- Martin Cooper On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: that's understandable

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Proposal For Jakarta Sub Project For Web Application Components

2005-06-22 Thread Martin Cooper
, since they may end up with a vested interest in this. -- Martin Cooper - robert On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 22:48 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: There has been considerable interest over the last few weeks and months concerning the possibility of a new Jakarta sub project similar

Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of InterWiki by ManikSurtani

2005-03-30 Thread Martin Cooper
to the newer wiki version. I've already put in a request to the infrastructure folks to change this back to the way it was. -- Martin Cooper On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:48:13 +0100, Kevin Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate to do this as I know this is not an admin list but in the last few days I've

Re: future for maven generated websites?

2005-03-27 Thread Martin Cooper
asked for more detail, the answer was essentially dunno yet. So I guess we'll have to wait and see, although if you have suggestions / want to keep up to date, infrastructure@ is the place to be. -- Martin Cooper On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 11:29:28 +0100, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Javadoc management

2005-03-15 Thread Martin Cooper
and javadocs, with options for javadocs being download or view online (a bit like Sun's download pages). We might not need to mirror right away - we could wait to see how much this gets used. I'm not familiar with ashkelon or multidoc. What would they bring to the party? -- Martin Cooper

Re: Problems under 1.5 Was: [site] New Jakarta download pages

2005-02-22 Thread Martin Cooper
to go through a build process before they can do that. -- Martin Cooper I think the process should be: 1) Build and test locally 2) SVN checkin 3) Log into jakarta 4) SVN checkout 5) Build to staging area; test stage 6) Build to production; test production The build.xml needs to have

Re: [site] bug update

2005-02-22 Thread Martin Cooper
, but rename the generated files from .sig to .asc. -- Martin Cooper * JEXL has no KEYS file * Turbine is quite fubar'd (was in binindex too). Out of date. Missing lots of entries. * ECS .asc files are fubar'd, they appear to be binary. Hen On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Henri Yandell wrote

Re: FW: PMC contact for Wiki Admin

2005-02-17 Thread Martin Cooper
bigger implications. But infrastructure@ is the place to get the real scoop. -- Martin Cooper Personally I'd love to see Confluence replace the Python Moin Moin, since Confluence is written in Java, shows off Jakarta through the use of many Jakarta packages, and shows support open source projects

Re: [VOTE] [site] New download pages

2005-02-17 Thread Martin Cooper
Looks good to me, apart from the not-working-ness. ;-) +1 -- Martin Cooper On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:47:37 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to go ahead and move to my suggested new download pages: http://jakarta.apache.org/~bayard/jakarta/site/downloads

Re: [site] Odd Ant question

2005-02-13 Thread Martin Cooper
'if' the property is set. That second target would do the copy. * Use pathconvert to generate the name of the CGI file based on the name of the HTML file. -- Martin Cooper On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:38:32 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before I lug myself off to the Ant lists, thought

Re: [site] Removing things

2005-01-08 Thread Martin Cooper
it. If we don't think we can fix it, then we have a serious problem. ;-) -- Martin Cooper 8) Removal of links to Japanese/Korean translations. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [site] Removing things

2005-01-08 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:28:34 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Martin Cooper wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:50:28 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Next up is to clean up various bits on the large front page. Here's the list

Re: [site] Removing things

2005-01-08 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:38:17 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Martin Cooper wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:28:34 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Martin Cooper wrote: On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:50:28 -0500

Re: [site] clean up

2005-01-06 Thread Martin Cooper
when something breaks? -- Martin Cooper i do try to ensure that any changes i make do not break links. the redirects should ensure that this doesn't happen. what i will try to do is to collect and collate the changes (once there's a reasonable number) and post an email to community detailing

Re: Last call for comments Was: [site] next step - 3-tier + welcome

2005-01-05 Thread Martin Cooper
for it. There are a couple of tweaky things - like the font seems a little bigger than it needs to be, and the section headers are different from the main ASF site - but they really are tweaky things that we can talk about and fiddle with later. -- Martin Cooper Any nay-sayers before then, let me

Re: jakarta-site2 now live on xslt

2005-01-03 Thread Martin Cooper
is self-contained. -- Martin Cooper Still, not to say that others in your list don't use it, such as jyve or various proposals in James etc, just nothing 'big' I think. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 3-column jakarta.apache.org?

2004-12-30 Thread Martin Cooper
' on its own would be a sufficient defintion. I suggested Alumni but I don't think I got any takers. It seemed like the logical noun to replace Graduated to me. IMO, Related is too broad, and it was being misused before. -- Martin Cooper Stephen

Re: 3-column jakarta.apache.org?

2004-12-29 Thread Martin Cooper
the columns). As it is now, with the indent, the center text - and especially the table - becomes a rather tall, skinny column in a default-sized browser window. The aim would also be to switch entirely over to the XSL build version which seems to work fine and dump Anakia creation. +1 -- Martin

Re: Mess in jakarta.apache.org/

2004-12-29 Thread Martin Cooper
not be monitoring this list, and they just might care. ;-) Anything obviously broken or dead should go. Not sure what's left after that. -- Martin Cooper On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:52:45 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Worringly, this is just the flotsam lying around at the top level

Re: 3-column jakarta.apache.org?

2004-12-29 Thread Martin Cooper
. 'Graduates' seems wrong. Looking for a good label here :) Alumni? -- Martin Cooper 4) Removing the margin from the ul that makes up the news would help spread that section out a bit. Yep. I'm going to hassle a few web designers I know on spacing issues once I've updated the XSL build

Re: Cleaning up Site2

2004-12-28 Thread Martin Cooper
it all on one page :) The challenge is how to make a 50 x 10 table look good. The FAQs page is pretty big all by itself. Not sure how you're going to manage incorporating that into a 'one page index', but I'll look forward to seeing what you come up with. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Hen

Re: Jakarta download pages Was: download pages in j.a.o.

2004-12-28 Thread Martin Cooper
number of artifacts of one subproject on the same page as all the other subprojects. -- Martin Cooper That's it. Hopefully much food for thought. Hen On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: Just I've tried to improve the usability

Re: Jakarta download pages Was: download pages in j.a.o.

2004-12-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:23:37 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:27:51 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Demo Builds, Milestone Builds: Do we even use these terms regularly? We

Re: download pages in j.a.o.

2004-12-27 Thread Martin Cooper
anything about the fact that they are downloading from a mirror site, and especially the fact that they need to verify the signature of what they download. If we could put that info before the links, I would be much happier. ;-) -- Martin Cooper http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi http

Re: Jakarta CVS modules

2004-12-26 Thread Martin Cooper
the broken links. -- Martin Cooper Ideally they would be in our archive too. Comments? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: new sandbox projects

2004-12-19 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 21:52:57 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Torsten Curdt wrote: Over at cocoon we have some code that might be worth sharing on jakarta commons. So I was wondering if the sandbox

Re: Converting Jakarta site and site2 to SVN

2004-12-18 Thread Martin Cooper
+1 to all of the proposals below. -- Martin Cooper On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:41:59 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for comments on the following proposal to move jakarta's site module to Subversion. jakarta-site2 CVS will be moved to /jakarta/ /site

Re: [vote] moving jakarta-site2 to subversion

2004-12-18 Thread Martin Cooper
vote requires majority (at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s ) [X] +1, migrate jakarta-site2 CVS to /jakarta/site SVN [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1, No -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: new sandbox projects

2004-12-15 Thread Martin Cooper
in to the Sanbox, no. To get out again, to Commons Proper, yes. ;-) Otherwise it would be great if I could get access to the sandbox so I can move the stuff over. I'll make a request to have you added to the jakarta group. -- Martin Cooper cheers -- Torsten

Re: new sandbox projects

2004-12-14 Thread Martin Cooper
good to me. I would be +1 for having these in the Commons sandbox. -- Martin Cooper cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Mail list page

2004-12-01 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:05:11 -0500 (EST), Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Couple of questions When are we going to remove projects which have been promoted from Jakarta, from the mail list page? Anyone mind if I do it now? Feel free to remove Struts. -- Martin Cooper

Re: Axion / Derby status?

2004-09-29 Thread Martin Cooper
at Tigris before moving the code over. I don't know about Derby. -- Martin Cooper On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:11:48 +1000, Mark Livingstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Guys, Could someone in the know :-) please tell me what the hold up seems to be with Axion moving into the incubator from it's

Re: CVS-SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Martin Cooper
be an important consideration for Commons as well, in determining whether separation occurs above or below the 'trunk' point in the tree. -- Martin Cooper Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Can I use Hibernate in an Apache project without compromising the Apache License?

2004-09-27 Thread Martin Cooper
not be able to distribute the results of such a build. -- Martin Cooper I was wondering if the dynamic linking thing hasn't be explitictely clarified in this: http://www.hibernate.org/196.html Or is the above still not satisfying? Just wondering... Oliver Henri Yandell wrote

Re: CVS-SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-25 Thread Martin Cooper
/cvs2svn.html -- Martin Cooper - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: FYI: Author tags

2004-09-13 Thread Martin Cooper
difficulties in establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our committers. there are other social issues dealing with collaborative development, but the Board is concerned about the legal ramifications around the use of author tags -- Martin Cooper Many do think that @author tags

Re: md5 checksum formats on BSD

2004-08-11 Thread Martin Cooper
(and the docs don't appear to say anything about different flavours of MD5). -- Martin Cooper On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:06:00 -0400, Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A subject came up on the Tomcat developers list which we thought should be shared with the whole community. Specifically

Re: Adding project version to bugzilla

2004-07-22 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Please remind me what I need to do / whom I need to ask that a new version (e.g. 5.0.26 and 5.0.27 for tomcat) be added to the list in Bugzilla's Version field? Asking here is fine. I've added 5.0.26 and 5.0.27 for Tomcat 5. -- Martin Cooper Thanks

RE: Adding project version to bugzilla

2004-07-22 Thread Martin Cooper
the folks who've chimed in, the only other person I know for sure has the right perms is Craig. -- Martin Cooper Hen On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Please remind me what I need to do / whom I need to ask that a new version

Re: Why wiki logs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- site-cvs@ might be better

2004-07-07 Thread Martin Cooper
the changes to go to a wider group in any case. -- Martin Cooper What would you think? Thanks, - Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International (Independent) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com

  1   2   >