Nope, I lie. No such address on the list, and I can't spot any other
address that looks similar.
As it's replying directly and not to the list (though I didn't get one
from my reply to the list), I'll try mailing Pedro's new address.
Hen
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Henri
Obviously getting too late if I'm doing the 5-second of thought for an
email thing.
Could be that another moderator has removed the address. I'll back off
for a bit so they can point out that they've done so.
Hen
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Nope, I lie. No
As we're the sponsoring PMC, useful for us to be up to date on this.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 25, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: Agila Podling Quarterly Report
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Agila has been moving slowly, but there is
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
There have recently been some discussions about handling dormant/dead
commons projects. And I've been wondering about the activity levels of
some projects recently (whether they are dead or not).
It's hard to track activity by email volumes, and subv
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Also, in Jakarta terms, you're talking about moving 50->100 people, which is
Oops, wrong number. 50->100 is the PMC, 50->400 is Jakarta, which in
itself shows the possibility for inactivity.
Came up with an idea for using SVN karma
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i follow the licensing list. IIRC there was a plan to create a legal FAQ
for committers. i might volunteer to set something in motion...
+1, meaning create it and I'll offer ideas/additions/suggestions :)
Hen
---
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
AIUI everything will be flat: collective management and only social
divisions. standard taglibs will become a jakarta sub-project.
+1, I agree.
BTW is there any real reason not to start the promotion process for
standard taglibs ASAP?
None
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 8/9/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
+1.
Let's leave Jakarta out of the names. It's assumed. So in the acronym
example from Frank, it would be Apache Jakarta WP4J and not JWP4J.
Makes sense.
Firstly, don't worry about the committership part Frank. I'm certain that
if you had a dec
Prior to calling a vote tomorrow, am I missing any potential names. This
is all I dredged out of the previous mail thread. 'webapp' was mentioned
instead of 'web'; but didn't seem to get any traction.
web bricks
web components
web parts (NOTE-1)
web commons
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Curt Arnold wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I went through the same situation Frank is heading into a few years back. I
had a large lump of code, some good, some crap that I wanted to donate into
various Commons projects. Some was accepted
it looks like I'm pretty close to what would happen.
Hen
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Curt Arnold wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I went through the same situation Frank is heading into a few years back.
I had a large lump of
We're getting in a bit of a half-finished state with regards to location
of things etc. Here's my list of things that it seems we need to get
done. Nice and aggressive to cause consternation:
Finish moving Tomcat to TLP
Propose Slide to TLP
Move Commons HttpClient to SLP
Move Turbine JCS to
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
It'd be nice to have a "state of jakarta" wiki page with all this stuff: I
think much of it is already captured on other pages like the SVN migration
wiki.
Create a 'Graveyard' for dead projects
We should start assembling a list of those.
SLP
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Create a 'Graveyard' for dead projects
Absolutely not. There is no such thing. I might agree to an Apache
"museum", which has marginally more acceptable semantics.
I'm not tied to any particular names.
Something to represent things that are not
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 8/10/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Promoting Commons Sandbox to SLP as 'Jakarta Sandbox'.
+ All Jakarta committers given access, central management of the sandbox
+ concepts as opposed to individu
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
(... to SVN...)
Yep. But I intentionally didn't migrate the dead projects into the
jakarta/turbine name space because this would be bound to lead to
confusion and to users seeing this and starting to ask what these trees
were.
This is
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vadim Gritsenko writes:
and vote for a release.
+1
+1, been noticing the commits :)
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
Done.
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Mark Thomas wrote:
Please can I have karma for Jakarta site. I want to keep the cvsindex page
updated as the Tomcat modules migrate to SVN.
Thanks,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Sorry for the 5 day instead of 1 day delay. Decided it was time to sell
the house so have spent much time tidying up :)
Please vote from the following shortlist of names. Please ignore the Web
vs Web App vs Webapp issue for the moment.
[ ]Apache Silk
[ ]Apache Web Bricks
[ ]A
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Please vote from the following shortlist of names. Please ignore the Web vs
Web App vs Webapp issue for the moment.
[+1]Apache Silk
[ ]Apache Web Bricks
[ ]Apache Web Commons (branding issue with Commons)
[ ]Apache Web Components
Done.
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi,
I tried to update the site with the last Cactus release, but it didn't work -
guess I need SVN karma.
Could someone please fix that?
Tks,
-- Felipe (user felipeal)
-
To
0 Aug 2005 03:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Osjava-users] Multidoc-jnr - opinions?
Multidoc was an idea I had to generate a project-wide documentation site
based on links to parts of each individual proje
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Prototype of what I want to do javadoc-wise for Jakarta :)
http://dist.osjava.org/releases/multidoc-jnr/
(click on something as long as it's not Payload 0.3 or 0.4; seems my
distributions are lacking javadoc there).
Should have sent a reminder yesterday. Anyway, 15 hours or so left to vote
:)
Hen
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Sorry for the 5 day instead of 1 day delay. Decided it was time to sell the
house so have spent much time tidying up :)
Please vote from the following shortlist
voted on and start with the fun
stuff.
Hen
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Assuming it doesn't degenerate into confusion, I'll end the vote on Sunday
midday EST. 3 votes needed, simple majority wins.
--
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
I toyed with similar ideas for a long time (I even had once an intern
whip something up), however, there are a number of drawbacks:
- different versions. The osjava variant tries to get this right by
allowing the user to choose the vers
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Nicest would be to do this in maven.xml; have it automatically know the
structure of the local javadoc tree and link the dependencies in. Easiest
is to just hack each one into the project.properties.
I got the "singl
Time to start filling in the subproject blanks on the September board
report:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-September2005
Current blanks are:
Cactus
Commons Betwixt
Commons CLI
Commons HttpClient (include a GSOC summary)
Commons Math (GSOC summary)
Hivemind
JMeter
Taglibs
Need a bit more than that Seb :)
Take a look at the previous board reports, we're looking for a bit of
colour as to what's happened to your sub-community during the previous
quarter, usually driven by what the release meant to the community. Is it
a bug release, major release etc, are there p
Published to:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/pmc/board-reports.html
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should show in 2 hours btw.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Published to:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/pmc/board-reports.html
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Oleg Kalnichevski
Henri Yandell
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've started a wiki page to plan any Jakarta/Apache-Java BoFs etc at
ApacheCon this December:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/AC2k5US
I've not been to one before, so if people could step in and fix any
confusion I'm showing in what I've done, please feel free.
Hen
-
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:30:02PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
IMHO if this is the vision then it would be better to rephrase the final
clause to make this clear. maybe something like:
* Jakarta Http Components will provide ONLY a toolse
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I've started a wiki page to plan any Jakarta/Apache-Java BoFs etc at
ApacheCon this December
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/AC2k5US
Shouldn't this be on http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ ?
I suck :)
Will kill it and roll it there.
-
Nope, it should be December. My time machine is simple, to get to time T
from time N, you sit in the machine for T - N and then get out :)
Idea is to have the report being written over the next 3 months and not at
the end, it worked a fair bit last quarter.
Hen
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Apache W
Any more comments before I call a vote?
Hen
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Prior to calling a PMC vote here in a week or two, I'd like to ask if anybody
has any comments on the following proposal for Commons HttpClient to become a
Jakarta subproject focusing on Http compo
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
jakarta's been self consciously shrinking over the last few years (it's
just too big and too complex) with a lot of old sub-projects graduating
to lop level status. it's more difficult now to persuade people that new
sub-projects should be acce
Tetsuya runs apachenews.org which usually carries all of the Jakarta
news.
He has RSS for each of his categories, so the Jakarta feed would be:
http://www.apachenews.org/archives/rss_apache_jakarta.xml
Hen
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
Is there any way to get the latest
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the developers/Mentors involved, and my project is not intended to be
"only" a FTP Server, but an Application Server that delegates all requests
to an existing user defined FTPAction. Maybe we could fit together both
projec
Cheers,
Oleg
- robert
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 01:10 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
Any more comments before I call a vote?
Hen
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Prior to calling a PMC vote here in a week or two, I'd like to ask if anybody
has any comments on the following pro
So, period of comments now over, let's go ahead and vote on the creation
of a Jakarta Subproject named Http Components with the following initial
charter:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-httpclient/NewProjectCharter
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
PMC votes are binding. We need consensus on the issue, so a s
hu, 20 Oct 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
So, period of comments now over, let's go ahead and vote on the creation
of a
Jakarta Subproject named Http Components with the following initial
charter:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
So, period of comments now over, let's go a
So, to move HttpClient up we need:
1) svn move (what is the new svn directory name to be?)
2) update the asf-authorization file
3) update the Jakarta navigation etc
4) move the httpclient site
5) make sure htaccess redirect is in place from old site
6) mailing list rename
7) what am I missing?
New idea to help us keep on top of what's going on. Here's the status as
far as I know it. A partner version for the pmc@ list will be sent to
cover a couple of issues that are currently non-public.
-
- JCS licensing. I believe these are now resolved.
- Silk. I'm still unable to underst
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Felipe Leme wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
- Silk. I'm still unable to understand how we get permission to use the
name, and am just posting to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list every so often.
Why? What's the issue with the name?
Partly it looks li
(from a post on commons-dev where the idea occurred to me)
I'm thinking that we should just set in stone a date at which point a new
committer is listed on the pmc list and asked if they should be on the pmc
(to the person nominating them as committers).
So let's say Fred becomes a committer
Tis board report time again.
Commons Net, IO, HttpClient, Validator and Velocity Tools all need to
comment on their news.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dum de dum de dum.
Just to be public so that it doesn't look like I'm sneaking around
trying to manipulate things.
--
I'm starting to open the question of TLP on many of the Jakarta dev
mailing lists. It's with a general plan where we would see another
half a dozen subprojects move to TLP an
ake sure no one thinks I'm forgetting them. :)
Hen
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
dum de dum de dum.
Just to be public so that it doesn't look like I'm sneaking around
trying to manipulate things.
--
I'm starting to open the question of TLP on many of the Jak
+1 to 2) and 3). Remove the Servlet 2.x ones too.
On 1), I wonder what would happen if we put a README.txt in there. Can we
have the feature where it shows the content of the README under the
directory listing, or does the mod_dav (or whatever it is) not support
that.
Hen
On Sun, 18 Dec 20
Published to:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/pmc/board-reports.html
Should show in a couple of hours.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
Hen
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:42:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
See interspersed. I am not quite to the "+" point yet, but probably either
ju
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
Not going too far: these are good ideas IMHO.
My aim for Jakarta is to either promote subprojects to TLP or flat
Second FYI, the external to Jakarta part of the specs thread is going on
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hen
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
The biggest problem with Jakarta currently is that we've become
increasingly disjoint. In many ways we are less healthy than we were 4
years ago. We have less projects, but much less in the way of intersection
be
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
Thinking more about this, I don't know about "pushing things into
commons". The important thing is consistent practices, consolidated
committers and community, but maybe not the naming. Jakarta BCEL
sounds fine to stay that way, as does Jakarta Commons
Hi Jan,
Which page are you looking at?
The current charter is at: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/management.html
and doesn't contain the text you're quoting.
Hen
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, jan meskens wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am currently discussing the Jakarta project charter and have a few
Just to report on my push for subprojects to move to TLP. I've hassled 6
subprojects so far:
* Slide: +1 (for a long time) though not very active which is why it's not
moved.
* Tapestry: They were +1 early last year; waiting until after 4.0 before
bringing the subject up
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
* Cactus: Seem to be +1 on a testing.apache.org TLP
By speaking of the TAO TLP (cool name :-), I 'extended' the invitation to the
dbunit project (which is currently on SourceForge and facing some
administrative i
Just to update.
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
Just to report on my push for subprojects to move to TLP. I've hassled 6
subprojects so far:
* Slide: +1 (for a long time) though not very active which is why it's not
moved.
Prodded.
* Tapestry: They were +1
a bit; but things like a
common build system, common site system etc.
* Sandbox becomes a Jakarta resource, not a Commons resource. Much of the
same rules as it has currently. Probably a separate mailing list.
-
Shout, scream, yell :)
Hen
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
d
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Thanks, Henri.
My feedback.
Thanks, very useful stuff.
* Generally positive with an aversion to anything involving significant work
for the sake of a "cleaner Jakarta". By this I mean that I like the idea of
a flatter hierarchy and a clearer
take place
there ? (though this could be something for infrastructure/board).
Hmm. I'll mention it, there might be legal issues in active use of the
name.
Henri Yandell wrote:
* Improved Committer->PMC process. Chair's responsibility (I've failed at
this so far) is to t
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:20 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/10/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Groups exist. These are categorically not subprojects, but a way to
allow for slicing of the website etc. Some groups ma
Robert got me looking at various Jakarta stats in a recent email of his.
Gave me something to do while I waited for a plane at 5am this morning :)
So, here's a dump of stats. A committer is defined as somebody with svn
access.
316 committers in Jakarta.
107 on PMC, 209 not on PMC.
8349 comm
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39"
For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP.
I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result
o
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-=-=-=-=
Mostly I'm worried about:
PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
Inactive committers wh
Hopefully no one minds; I'm creating doap files to help with the
development of projects.apache.org for Jakarta projects. Idea is that
they're checked into the top level of each subproject.
Example being:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bcel/trunk/doap_bcel.rdf
ECS, BSF, BCEL, ORO a
Hi Angelo,
From the point of view of Apache and the Apache licence, you can take the
Apache-licensed Velocity and include either its source or its binary in
your work.
Provided you obey the clauses of the ASL 2.0:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Chiefly:
* Include a copy of the
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move
Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the
Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to
Sorry to bounce you over to another list Melissa, but Tomcat is no longer
in Jakarta. You could try mailing their list (dev@tomcat.apache.org), but
bear in mind that they don't have a vendor support page.
In fact, now that Tomcat has moved to tomcat.apache.org, the Vendor
support page has le
As per the previous email, I'd like to raise the question of killing the
vendor support page. With Tomcat moving to TLP, there's even less Jakarta
support here than before. Mainly it's Ant, Struts, Log4j, Tomcat and HTTP
Server.
Alternatively, we could attempt to make it a Java support page
Do we remove the people who list support for non-Jakarta products, or is
our vendor wiki page for all of the ASF?
Hen
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Tom Evans wrote:
+1 (as one of the vendors) for moving to the Wiki with a link from the
Jakarta home page as Will suggested, rather than killing it alt
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Ian Darwin wrote:
ankit jain wrote:
I've installed j2sdk1.4.1 and tomcat.I'm tring to connect to MS Access but
getting the error mess as no default driver specified.i've written the data
source in odbc in DSN and also able to connect to MS Access using jsp
programmes bu
You should both be unsubscribed now.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Givens, Denise wrote:
Ditto, I
-Original Message-
From: Bernard, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:43 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: i've unsub'd several times
What does a guy have to do
Neither product contains encryption algorithms - which is the only thing
I'm aware of that the ASF are likely to ship that might require an ECCN.
Hen
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Topal, Ali wrote:
Hello Dear Sir or Madam,
We would like to know the ECCN numbers (Export control classification number
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Apache Silk it is:
[17]Apache Silk
[ 0]Apache Web Bricks
[ 0]Apache Web Commons (branding issue with Commons)
[ 3]Apache Web Components
[ 0]Apache Web Parts (conflict with Microsoft and sf.net)
20 +1 votes with 1 abstainer.
So
Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've come to understand that a name Apache FOO does not violate the
trademark FOO. As such, I don't think there's any problem with Apache
Silk.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 00:49 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005,
does not violate the
trademark FOO. As such, I don't think there's any problem with Apache
Silk.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 00:49 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Apache Silk it is:
[17]Apache Silk
[ 0]Apache Web Bricks
[ 0]Apache We
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Mar 2006
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the
ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of
time to prepare the report.
The meeting is sched
I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities
and on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you are members of
Jakarta - not a subproject"; but you've heard it all before.
So, proposal:
I notice that Commons and HTTP Components both have charters. Other
subprojects may have them and I've just missed in my very quick look.
Do these serve any purpose? Are they a legacy of the days when we tried to
create an ASF-like structure within Jakarta to organize things?
Any reason not
I really shouldn't be sending multiple emails at the same time - you'll
all jsut end up replying to one of them. However, itching while the itch
is present.
Alexandria is dead. We need to represent it as so on the site.
ECS, ORO, Regexp are inactive development-wise - represent - site.
Slide,
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 05.03.2006, at 20:21, Henri Yandell wrote:
I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities and
on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.03.2006, 15:03 + schrieb sebb:
Might be worth distinguishing the Mature/Stable projects - e.g. ORO.
[We're happily using that in JMeter]
Yes, I second that. "Inactive", "dormant" etc. sound negative while
"mature" or "stable" lea
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I notice that Commons and HTTP Components both have charters. Other
subprojects may have them and I've just missed in my very quick look.
Do these serve any purpose? Are they a legacy
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really shouldn't be sending multiple emails at the same time - you'll
all jsut end up replying to one of them. However, itching while the itch
is present.
Alexandria is dead. We n
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why restrict a project?
One of your big things right now - order and organisation. ;-)
Guess I don't see this as one that needs constraining - how a
component/subproject does somet
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.03.2006, 16:08 -0500 schrieb Henri Yandell:
Inactive Subprojects
...
* POI
...
No! POI is not inactive at all. I just committed a major enhancement a
few days ago.
*evil grin*
I may have added a couple to that list that I
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
I'm mildly positive on "all votes on general". A corollary of this would be
to encourage everyone to sign up for general. Maybe put this in big letters
on the Jakarta home page. It seems a good way to try out the "one
community" idea, see if it fi
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Inactive Subprojects
* Cactus
Cactus is more on a 'Hibernation' status; I agree there hasn't been
activities in the last weeks, but we have some stuff planned (for instance, I
should have relased Cactus 1
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why restrict a project?
One of your big things right now - order and organisation. ;
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All (90%?) of the navel gazing comes down to one binary question. Should
Jakarta be a community, or a community of communities. Are we Jakarta
committers, or ORO committers.
It should be w
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm not tied to any of the things I'm suggesting - except the strong
belief that Jakarta as a community of communities cannot work. So I'm
definitely in favour of more shared site and less individual site - I&#
(feel free to keep discussing names etc, but for the moment I'm going to
go ahead with the one above)
Would anyone like to start putting together a list of constituent parts
for JWC? Please include a proposal for what will happen to any subprojects
left dead by the creation of JWC (ie: Tagli
I am now back in business on the signing of PGP keys etc. So I get to
irritate by pointing out that we have 26 unsigned files in our
distribution:
http://people.apache.org/~henkp/checker/sig.html#unsig-jakarta
felipeal
taylor (jetspeed - need to kick this out of our dist(?))
rwaldhoff
dirkv
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
From Commons:
* EL (dormant?)
Tricky status here, and here's why: the JSP 2.1 spec has EL changes,
and they're significant enough that Jacob Hookum did an almost
cleanroom implementation of EL. He's a newly-elected Tomcat committer
(Tomcat 6
401 - 500 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
