Hi,
Would someone please point me in the proper direction to start reading
what I need to do to resolve this problem?
[blocks B ] dev-util/cargo ("dev-util/cargo" is blocking
dev-lang/rust-1.30.1-r1)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at
On 10/31/2018 10:49 AM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
You could also define a function like … and skip the extra script file.
Agreed.
Though I've found that scripts are nicer for some things, like remote
command execution. ;-)
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 09/12/2018 09:59 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
This piqued my interest and decided to google a little bit. Found the
following, which might help:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/93566/how-to-log-all-bash-commands-by-all-users-on-a-server
I would not want to rely on the PROMPT_COMMAND
On 09/12/2018 12:24 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Does sudo have a shell-mode?
You can use "-i" to invoke a shell, but that's just the target users
destination shell.
I prefer to use a utility (wrapper) that I wrote that allows me to
leverage sudo in my user shell without having to think about
On 09/11/2018 06:51 AM, wiicontrol...@gmail.com wrote:
If by “all” activity, the customer means all activity, pam_tty_audit is
the only solution I have heard of that fits the bill:
On 09/11/2018 04:52 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Is there a recommended way to track the logs? Specific setup for
syslog-ng or in my case journald?
Tracking log files is different than getting things into log files.
By default, shell history is decidedly excluded from system logs.
There
On 06/19/2018 05:57 AM, Mick wrote:
Actually, I don't know if there is a way to set up multiple nameservers
for corresponding name resolution in/out of the tunnel, without using a
domain- specific override as you would with dnsmasq and without leaking
DNS queries to the ISP if you are meant to
On 06/18/2018 04:30 AM, Mick wrote:
Hi Grant,
Hi Mick,
I am not overly familiar with networkmanager and the OP has not shared any
screenshots or tab-by-tab NM settings, but had a look on a Gnome desktop
and when hovering over the "Use only for resources on this connection"
setting in the
On 06/17/2018 03:05 PM, Mick wrote:
TBH I wouldn't select "Use only for resources on this connection",
I thought "Use only for resources on this connection" would enable (what
I know as) "split horizon", which is what I thought the OP wanted to do.
In other words route company traffic
On 06/12/2018 09:17 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Okay, I've got it mostly working now. The missing route seems to be
"10.0.0.0", "255.0.0.0", "0.0.0.0", "100".
255.0.0.0/8 is special and 0.0.0.0/0 is very special.
255/8 is not globally routed and contains 255.255.255.255 which is used
as a
On 06/11/2018 06:50 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
The “dev” syntax is correct. As tun0 is a L3 tunnel, you don’t
have to bother about ARP next-hop resolution.
Thank you for the confirmation Alarig.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 06/11/2018 02:51 PM, Mick wrote:
As I understand it, the CGN router will rewrite the IP headers and ports from/
to the SOHO router using PCP. This is not a TCP-over-TCP tunnel.
The VPN could be TCP based and it could be sending TCP through it. Yes,
the potential pitfalls of TCP-in-TCP
On 06/11/2018 04:55 AM, Mick wrote:
You'll need a trusted gateway to do the unwrapping and then forwarding
to the next hop (SSH forwarding). If you attempt TCP-tunneling
(TCP-over-TCP) you'll soon experience 'TCP meltdown' with upper and
lower TCP layers' retransmission timeouts.
I
On 06/10/2018 01:13 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I'll respond later with more details as to what I do to run various
things in Network Namespaces.
I create the following directories ("mkdir -p" type thing):
- /run/mountns/$NSname
- /run/netns/$NSname
- /utsns/$NSname
Firs
On 06/10/2018 12:30 PM, Mick wrote:
If NAT'ed between guest and host and then NAT'ed again at the home
router, you are double NAT'ed.
Or possibly triple NATed if your ISP is using Carrier Grade NAT.
At least that's one definition of "double NAT". I tend to use a
different definition, one
On 06/10/2018 12:22 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
Is it possible to have a VPN clent set up in one of these namespaces
and route certain traffic through it from the main stack?
I see no reason why it couldn't.
It may be entertaining to start and stop the VPN client.
I'll respond later with more
On 06/10/2018 10:53 AM, Mick wrote:
Ahh! If you're trying to set this up within a VM, this adds a whole
new layer of complexity. I assume you're setting up a bridge between
host and guest device(s)?
Yes, VMs can add additional complexity to the situation. However I
suspect that's not the
On 06/09/2018 06:31 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Okay, with all that advice, I gave it another try. I'm also setting
up a VirtualBox for my WFH stuff and VB wants to use 10.0.0.0 for its
networking. I've changed this to 172.16.0.0 so now I can easily tell
that network from work network (which
It helps if I actually add the foot note.
On 06/10/2018 10:38 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I will say that you'll likely need other systems [1] to test things like
tunnels to / between.
[1] You can easily have one machine be multiple systems via Network
Namespaces.
I routinely use Network
On 06/10/2018 07:15 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
Hi,
I'm trying to learn how to use the "ip" command to manage routing on
one of my boxes, which has two Ethernet interfaces.
Cool. There's a LOT that you can do.
I will say that you'll likely need other systems [1] to test things
On 06/08/2018 10:42 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Is there _any_ way around the need to keep the user IDs matched on NFS
clients and servers?
I can argue that the IDs don't have to be synchronized to use NFS. You
just end up with unexpected complications from different IDs on
different systems.
On 06/08/2018 06:20 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
What would be the "correct" output for "ip route"?
It's difficult to say.
I'd look up some of the *.i.company.com names and see what IP addresses
they resolve to.
I'd then reconfigure the VPN with "Use only for resources on this
connection."
On 06/08/2018 03:31 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Sigh, I take it back. That causes the internal sites to no longer work.
Okay.
So you're on the proper track.
I'm guessing the work network isn't a simple single prefix. Or at least
the VPN client doesn't route enough through the VPN.
Check
On 06/08/2018 01:42 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Hilco,
I am logging all DNS requests and I can see that dnsmasq is responding
correctly (and, in fact, identically) to, say, google.com with or without
VPN. But the browser just hangs. Until I disconnect VPN, then everything
works
On 05/22/2018 07:33 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
putty (has a gui and minimal configuration possibilities for serial
connections and bunch more...)
plink is the command line / text equivalent of PuTTY, from the same authors.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 05/22/2018 05:12 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
The 3270 was completely screen-oriented. An entire screen was loaded
from the host. That screen included fields with various attributes
(e.g. editable vs. read-only). You could edit whatever was editable on
the screen, and then when you hit
On 05/22/2018 03:44 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
Yes - screen can hold everything until you hit enter and allow you to
edit the line and do wrapping clientside. Screen also handles control
codes properly.
Good to know.
Aside: Now my brain is trying to remember the old differences between
telnet and
On 05/22/2018 03:06 PM, David M. Fellows wrote:
As a terminal emulator that has a lot of configurabilty.
I'm quite curious what sort of configuration you use in (what I
understand to be) a text based communications package in your day to day
activities.
I do so much via SSH that I don't
On 05/22/2018 02:39 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Just to be pedantic, ckermit isn't a terminal emulator. It's a serial
comm package that will connect a serial port to whatever terminal/tty
you used to run the ckermit command. It's also a file transfer protocol,
but that's pretty much irrelevant
On 05/22/2018 02:43 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
Have you tried screen? It may have more features than kermit by default,
but it is intended for speaking with "smart" terminal devices and will
do lots of input processing.
Are you saying that screen (and possibly tmux, etc.) have the ability to
inject
On 05/22/2018 12:45 PM, David M. Fellows wrote:
Since you want to blast to the past... kermit may do what you
need. Back in the day it connected everything to everything.
See http://www.kermitproject.org/ emerge ckermit.
Are you advocating kermit as a protocol or as a terminal (emulator)
On 05/22/2018 01:00 PM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
Pro-tip: if running emacs on the remote machine, make sure your
terminal-connection does not interpret Control-S as a STOP signal,
i.e. anything to do with XON/XOFF you do NOT want enabled in your
shell-connection.
Just to clarify, this is a
On 05/22/2018 11:54 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Random thought: I have no idea if Plan9's terminal emulator has any
features for this or not. It may be worth looking at. I believe it's
been ported to Linux.
You might also want to check out using vim or emacs as they have
terminal emulators
On 05/22/2018 11:39 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
I am currently exploring Mecrisp-Stellaris FORTH on a STM32F103C8 uC.
#learningIsFun
To communicate with the FORTH-system I use a serlal terminal console
like picocom.
Okay.
Since I am still learning this quirky though fascinating language I
On 05/16/2018 03:11 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
Today, I feel the need to ask about how to Globally Disable Prompt
Formatting, In All Programs Everywhere For All Time.
I'm not aware of a universal way to disable prompt formatting.
Are you talking specifically about the shell prompt?
What other things
On 04/06/2018 04:51 PM, Mick wrote:
Domestic grade routers which offer IKEv1, typically use PSK for
authentication, not TLS certificates. The PSK is what IKE uses in
userspace to establish a secure connection with authentication between
peers for the purpose of exchanging the IPSec keys to
On 04/06/2018 11:58 AM, Mick wrote:
I think you mean IKEv2 + IPSec?
I don't remember IKE involved the last time I had to manually
set up an IPSec connection between two Windows systems (or Windows and a
Netgear router). I think it was /completely/ manual and PSK.
IKEv2 is used to exchange
On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
Yes, the Host is running Windows.
Seeing as how both the ""Host and the ""Client are running Windows, I
would think seriously about trying to leverage Windows' built in VPN
capabilities.
The following things come to mind:
- (raw) IPSec - this might
On 04/05/2018 08:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
It is strange because just today I have learned that VPN server should
be set on the host with static IP visible the in Internet. Otherwise a
VPN-client has no way to connect to the VPN-server.
The static IP is not a strict requirement. It just greatly
On 04/05/2018 03:51 AM, gevisz wrote:
Yes. And the Client also has static IP. Moreover, both OR and IR have
static IPs from the inside. So, the Host can make a connection request
to the Client.
With the client having a static IP, things become a LOT simpler. Simply
flip things around and
On 04/04/2018 02:18 PM, gevisz wrote:
A friend of mine asked me to recommend him an open-source VPN-server
for Linux but unfortunately I never used one.
That's a loaded ask.
After some googling, I have found OpenVPN but do not know if it is the
best choice that suits his purposes, namely to
On 04/03/2018 05:19 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
"mtr", "vim", and "less" all three use what Xterm calls the "Alternate
Screen". You can see this while the programs are running by looking at
the VT Options menu (Ctrl+Middle Click) and seeing that the "Sh
On 04/03/2018 02:50 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Lately, I've noticed that text apps under xterm snap back to the
original screen after the app finishes. This doesn't happen with
all apps. When I hit "q" in "top", the output stays on the screen.
But other apps like "mtr" and "vim" and "less"
On 04/02/2018 10:15 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Does that mean LFS is dead? That would be a pity.
Nope. I see "2018" on the http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ website. At
a quick glance, it looks like LFS is still alive.
I was referring to my ignorance of if LFS has changed since I last
On 04/02/2018 08:47 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
If you haven't installed and maintained a gentoo system before, its a
great way of building a solid foundation of knowledge.
Agreed.
Though I do think that reading the Linux from Scratch book and doing the
install along with the book will likely
On 03/31/2018 09:37 AM, Hubert Hauser wrote:
Hello!
Hi,
I want to learn from scratch securing Linux and ethical hacking. Should
I do as the most people so install Kali Linux on virtual machine or
install Gentoo Hardened with Pentoo overlay on my PC? I heard a lot of
negative opinions about
On 03/28/2018 03:53 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Well, that's too many 3-letter acronyms for me It is lower level, yes.
All the filesystem code is on the client; the server only handles requests
of the form "here's the new contents of block 1234, and be sure to tell
me when it's safely on disk".
On 03/28/2018 02:51 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
NBD (Network Block Device) may be an alternative to NFS in some situations.
Doesn't NBD (iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet) show up more like SAN compared
to NFS which is NAS?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 03/04/2018 05:45 AM, Stroller wrote:
Yet the above had a from: address at the tnetconsulting.net domain.
Said from address was a sub-domain, which has a different DMARC policy.
Moaning to me won't change how the mailing list software works.
Sharing my opinion on things without expecting
On 03/03/2018 05:55 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Assuming I just want filtering, could I emerge nftables and unmerge
iptables and have a functional firewall?
Simplistically, yes.
It's my understanding that iptables and nftables are two completely
different firewalling technologies. So you will
On 03/03/2018 12:00 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
* I do not consider messages from me re-sent by mailing lists to be
messages that I send. I say this because my email infrastructure does
NOT connect to any of the mailing list subscribers receiving email
infrastructure. IMHO the mailing list
On 03/03/2018 07:47 AM, Stroller wrote:
My recollection is that I read this isn't that beneficial - that a policy
of ~ is adequate.
I'm guessing that you're referring to SPF's "~all" policy.
Why, as a domain owner that knows for a fact where messages are sent
from, want to allow for the
On 03/03/2018 05:54 AM, Mick wrote:
UDP encapsulation as used for e.g. VPN does not suffer with the same
problem because it does not use the same transmission quality control
mechanism as TCP.
I think it's fair to say that it doesn't suffer at the protocol (TCP /
UDP) level. There is
On 03/02/2018 10:34 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
No, my system is not recognizing "sdb"
Hum. :-/
Your original dmesg output showed that the kernel detected sdb.
What does lsblk (?) show?
Does your system detect USB flash drives properly? (USB Mass Storage)
--
Grant. . . .
unix ||
On 03/02/2018 10:17 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've tried:
fsck.vfat -v -a -w /dev/sdb1
fsck.fat 4.0 (2016-05-06)
open: No such file or directory
This doesn't work either:
fdisk /dev/sdb
Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.28.2).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write
On 03/02/2018 05:47 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Flam^H^H^H^H value judgments aside, does DMARC also change the long
standing standard of sending rejections to the envelope address?
No, DMARC should not change the principle operation of SMTP, save for
additional checks that messages must pass.
On 03/02/2018 04:59 PM, Dale wrote:
I admit. This is all over my head. I'm just hoping I didn't miss
anything important. The biggest thing, some of you figured out what
happened, created a roach report and hopefully it will lead to a fix
at some point. Heck, I'm happy that whatever the
On 03/02/2018 09:45 AM, Mick wrote:
Does it make a measurable difference, after the guest OS has booted?
IMHO, /bin/yes
I'll need to try this out. :-)
Yes, you should try it out for yourself.
I've found that removing not-strictly-needed layers of abstraction
reduces complexity and makes
On 03/02/2018 08:33 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
You can pass a block device directly to QEMU, and this is recommended
for performance reasons. I have a Windows 10 VM that was passed an
entire SSD; it runs fine, and you can take the disk and plug it into
other computers. Passing a partition is a little
On 03/02/2018 05:08 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On the other hand, if netfilter were implemented in userspace such as
via a microkernel, then if it contained a bug the remote attacker would
be able to MITM all network traffic on the machine, but that would
be the extent of the access they have.
On 03/02/2018 02:52 PM, Dale wrote:
I did send a help message first, so that I would know exactly what to do.
I followed it. Still, I don't think I received anything even now.
I'm not surprised.
The testing that I did last night when you posted the links caused me to
believe that the
On 03/02/2018 09:36 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
These are all from Grant Taylor. They are DKIM-signed, and, not
surprisingly given the list header and footer munging, signature
verification fails (on my mail server).
Correct. DKIM verification is failing and my DMARC policy is configured
On 03/01/2018 03:12 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
I had great trouble with yahoo and a mailing list - it kept filing all
the ham (from mailing lists) as spam, and left all the spam (mostly
yahoo advertising crap in the inbox.
Consider the source of your troubles. ;-)
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 02/28/2018 04:47 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I know that iptables can filter based on a process owner and cgroup. So,
depending on how the applications are running, you might be able to come
close to what you're after.
You might be able to punt (metadata about) packets into a user space
On 02/28/2018 04:22 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
Is there a windows style application layer firewall?
I'm not aware of one.
I know that iptables can filter based on a process owner and cgroup.
So, depending on how the applications are running, you might be able to
come close to what you're
On 02/28/2018 02:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Is there something besides iptables?
nftables
I think BPF may come into context here, but I've mostly ignored it, so
I'm not sure.
It seems to be like systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope.
What do you mean?
I've seen newer
On 02/22/2018 07:43 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Is there such a thing as a linux network filesystem that aggregates
storage across a few machines? I am not talking about dedicated chunk
servers and the like, but something that can make available a the unused
space on a number of machines
On 02/09/2018 03:30 AM, gevisz wrote:
May be, it is not a good idea to put /mnt on tmpfs at the time of Spector
and Meltdown?
I wouldn't put /mnt on tmpfs as I routinely create mount points there
in. As such they would be lost on reboot.
What difference does Spector or Meltdown (or the
On 02/08/2018 03:32 PM, gevisz wrote:
In this case it would be nice to hear a reason.
I think the reason probably goes back a number of years. When /tmp was
made volatile (ram / swap backed) there was a need for non-volatile temp
space. Thus, /var/tmp was created as non-volatile
On 02/08/2018 04:18 PM, Wol's lists wrote:
EMPHATICALLY YES.
;-)
/tmp is defined as being volatile - stuff can disappear at any time.
I don't know that I've ever had things in /tmp disappear "at any time"
as in randomly and without external influence. Usually it's a reboot or
nightly
On 02/08/2018 10:11 AM, gevisz wrote:
And I am going to set the whole /var/tmp on tpmfs instead of just
/var/tmp/portage
Is it ok?
I don't know about the context of emerging, but I do know about the
context of /var/tmp being volatile.
More specifically, /var/tmp is traditionally supposed
On 02/02/2018 01:03 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_relative_clauses#That_or_which_for_non-human_antecedents
This mentions Fowlers, the reference that Peter said to read.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, the distinction, and so the subtleties of meaning, is
falling
On 02/02/2018 01:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
We could use Perl.
I see your Perl and raise you Lisp.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 02/01/2018 11:55 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
MUPHRY'S LAW: The principle that any criticism of the writing of others
will itself contain at least one grammatical error.
And don't get me started on people using "which" when they should be using
"that".
(In this case, which is correct but it
On 02/01/2018 11:50 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
etc is from the Latin et cetera, meaning "I couldn't be bothered thinking
of any more".
~chuckle~
IMHO that makes the name of the "/etc" directory all that much more
entertaining. As in Dennis R. and Ken T. couldn't be bothered to come
up with
On 01/19/2018 05:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I'm trying to juggle the various pieces as I understand them to see if
everything can work together.
I have a fleeting thought that /might/ work. I want to write it down
before I loose it.
1) Configure Sendmail's MTA to not have any listening
On 01/19/2018 04:58 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected based
on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real one).
Okay
I get the impression from exim and postfix docs that outbound routing
based on input method
On 01/19/2018 04:04 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
One of the hassles with those is that portage won't allow me to install
any of them because they conflict with msmtp, which is what I use for
sending normal e-mail.
I would expect that you can use any of those in place of msmtp to send
email too.
On 01/19/2018 03:24 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
But if I understand the problem now (a well sized if, LOL) that doesn't
by itself help you because the existing script is broken; replacing the
script is the main part of the problem. Right?
Grant E.'s existing script purportedly functions just
On 01/19/2018 01:29 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Aargh. smtpd. Typos like that certinaly don't help the confusion.
*chuckle* - Mistakes happen. - Context answered the question more
than 90%.
I'm going to try stunnel in front of the existing solution first.
If that doesn't work, I'll try
On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, and it looks like the Postfix equivalent is a custom pipe transport.
Once you know what phrases to google for, it's a lot easier.
*nod*
I figured that you would be able to find something.
Hence why I mentioned the terms. ;-)
I could live
On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I'm also wondering why you need 2 bits. Earlier in the thread you
mentioned that you send perhaps a few messages a week and never more
than one connection at a time.
Grant E. has indicated elsewhere in the thread that his
/usr/bin/sendmail script
On 01/19/2018 11:59 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I meant the sematics and sytax of the command line options and the data
accepted on stdin and produced on stdout. I probably should have said
"usage" rather than API. Since I always use that utility from a Python
or Bash program, in my head that's
On 01/19/2018 11:38 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I have a /usr/bin/sendmail emulator that transfers mail to an MTA that
will then worry about delivery. I need an SMTP server that will relay
incoming mail by using that existing command-line utility.
…
I need something that accepts mail via SMTP
On 01/19/2018 11:31 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I want to accept incoming email via SMTP (my computer is an SMTP server).
Okay.
So you don't need to accept mail via /usr/sbin/sendmail (et al).
Or rather, that's what you want email to leave the relay through.
I want to relay each of those
On 01/19/2018 11:03 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I need to setup an SMTP relay server.
Okay.
It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g.
On 01/09/2018 01:52 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You can usually add extra configure items by creating, in your case
/etc/portage/env/x11-terms/xterm containing
EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-blah..."
I created the /etc/portage/env/x11-terms directory and added the xterm
file with the following
On 01/09/2018 01:52 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You can usually add extra configure items by creating, in your case
/etc/portage/env/x11-terms/xterm containing
EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-blah..."
That seems simple enough.
Putting the patch in /etc/portage/patches/x11-xterms/xterm should do it.
How do I customize the features that are compiled into x11-terms/xterm?
I have been playing with a customized version of Xterm outside of
portage and I'd like to migrate my customizations to the copy of Xterm
that is emerged as part of the system.
So far my customizations consist of a
On 12/25/2017 04:33 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
This is interesting, but can it run gentoo?
I don't know about booting Gentoo as released or not. But I do know
that the OpenPOWER9 machines won't run AIX. So they /must/ run Linux.
(There may be something else that will run on them that I'm not
On 12/24/2017 02:43 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
Oh I just noticed that vtv is now default enabled for gcc, so you
could try;
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvtable-verify=std"
I tried this on earlier gccs, and there was a fair bit of breakage so
i didnt persue it. Maybe i'll re-try with 7.2 to see how
401 - 491 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
