[Gimp-developer] Non-interactive (file-save-png)?

2003-07-19 Thread Douglas Lewan
I have more than a handful of PNGs that should all be cropped and saved in the same way, i.e. the same rectangle cut from the left side. (file-save-png) either (1) wants to complain about saving a channel (presumably the cut selection) or (2) necessarily pops up the Save-As-PNG dialogue (even

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Patrick McFarland
On 18-Jul-2003, Christopher Curtis wrote: The 1.9.x Building GIMP 2.0 branch o GEGL -- Gimp 'E' Graphical Library o GCim -- The convergence integrated media object and utility library. I am one of these active users that have been lead to believe that gimp 2.0 will use GEGL. So, all the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gradient dithering

2003-07-19 Thread Patrick McFarland
On 19-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote: We might do another 1.2 release but I doubt that this will happen and it would surely be just be a bug-fix release with no new feature whatsoever. GIMP-1.3 is close to being released as 2.0 and support for 1.2 will be dropped then. Releasing the stable from

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Friday 18 July 2003 16:59, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, I'd like to inform you about our plans for the GIMP 2.0 release. (...) Originally we wanted to get GIMP 2.0 out at GimpCon. Since that is actually in three weeks, we will definitely not make it but I am still optimistic that we will

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 00.18 schrieb Sven Neumann: I am not sure what you are trying to say here but actually I was hoping to hear some helpful and constructive comments on gimp-help2 from you. Did you read my mail at all? I've read every single mail to the mailinglist however I hoped to

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Branko Collin
On 19 Jul 2003, at 12:04, Daniel Egger wrote: Here's the explanation about the gimp-help2 project: Mel and I started gimp-help2 from scratch in order to create a completely new structured documentation in XML without any cruft from the old module. We agreed that I am the technical maintainer

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Alastair Robinson
Hi Sven, On Saturday 19 July 2003 7:48 am, It has lots and lots of features that we did never promise and despite of 16bit support I don't see what we would be missing (provided we get the basic CMYK supoprt finished that we started to work on). I really Since I'm new to the 1.3 branch,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gradient dithering

2003-07-19 Thread Tomas Ogren
On 19 July, 2003 - Patrick McFarland sent me these 1,1K bytes: On 19-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote: We might do another 1.2 release but I doubt that this will happen and it would surely be just be a bug-fix release with no new feature whatsoever. GIMP-1.3 is close to being released as 2.0

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 14.09 schrieb Branko Collin: Isn't Rebecca Walter part of the team anymore? Her new job took over all her spare time so she couldn't actively participate. She promised to chime in when there's some content to proof it but since there's not much to proof I could spare

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Carol Spears
Daniel Egger wrote: Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 14.09 schrieb Branko Collin: Isn't Rebecca Walter part of the team anymore? Her new job took over all her spare time so she couldn't actively participate. She promised to chime in when there's some content to proof it but since there's not much

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Carol Spears
Daniel Egger wrote: Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 19.10 schrieb Carol Spears: It is difficult to share a freshman attempt with developers. If anyone is interested in seeing what I am doing, helping, commenting or running it through validation devices, feel free to suggest the best way to share these

(LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] tentativeGIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-19 Thread David Neary
Hi, Right up front, I'd like to say that as far as I'm concerned the 1.3+ debate is closed. I'm happy with 2.0, but even if I weren't I don't think the version number is a big deal. This mail is about other stuff... Nathan Carl Summers wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: First of

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread pcg
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:59:22PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: decision. We came to the point that it should be called 2.0. It's just a number, so please, before you start the discussion again, think twice if it's worth it. It's not just a number, it is also used in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
On 07/19/03 13:10, Carol Spears wrote: I also will not write any English documentation until I can afford to buy that book that explains the English rules about hyphens. I'm not sure what book or what hyphens you are talking about, but the Elements of Style is in the public domain. Here are

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
On 07/19/03 13:10, Carol Spears wrote: I also will not write any English documentation until I can afford to buy that book that explains the English rules about hyphens. Also, I'm not heard of this, but it sounds like it may pertain more to British English (I'm under the impression that

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Daniel Egger
Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 19.10 schrieb Carol Spears: It is difficult to share a freshman attempt with developers. If anyone is interested in seeing what I am doing, helping, commenting or running it through validation devices, feel free to suggest the best way to share these files. For the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf [Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 10,Issue 18]

2003-07-19 Thread pcg
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:16:27PM +0200, Tomas Ogren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vim? emacs? .. I bet there are many editors that can handle large text files.. One thing (to bring this more on-topic again) to note is that vim doesn't handle large (gigabytes) files nice, loading it into memory.

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread pcg
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:10:54AM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gimp is more than Mitch and me, isn't it? Yes it is. And if you are really willing to continue this sinless discussion instead of helping us to get the release done, we can of This is *extremely* unfair. _You_

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-19 Thread Michael Schumacher
On 19 Jul 2003 at 22:13, David Neary wrote: [...] Those are the problems at the philosophical level. At the practical level, the problems are: 1) Not enough users use bugzilla to report bugs Bugzilla is powerful, but its power comes at the price of complexity... 2) Not enough developers

Re: [Gimp-developer] tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans

2003-07-19 Thread Carol Spears
Christopher W. Curtis wrote: On 07/19/03 13:10, Carol Spears wrote: I also will not write any English documentation until I can afford to buy that book that explains the English rules about hyphens. Also, I'm not heard of this, but it sounds like it may pertain more to British English

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

2003-07-19 Thread Carol Spears
Michael Schumacher wrote: On 19 Jul 2003 at 22:13, David Neary wrote: [...] Those are the problems at the philosophical level. At the practical level, the problems are: 1) Not enough users use bugzilla to report bugs Bugzilla is powerful, but its power comes at the price of complexity...