On 08/09/2010 10:32 PM, Rupert Weber wrote:
On 08/09/2010 07:42 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
As long as you are available to respond to feedback about the patch, it
will be included into 2.8, don't worry. It's just that it might take a
while before anyone gets around to review and test it
On 08/09/2010 10:51 PM, LightningIsMyName wrote:
Hello,
I recently re-read all the GSoC suggestions for 2010, and I found this
interesting one about making the menus searchable:
https://sites.google.com/site/gimpwiki/long-term-plans/menu-accesibility
0. How do we want the search to work? A
Hi,
I tried out 2.7.3 from the 'matthaeus123' PPA for Ubuntu. I like the new
features but noted some performance issues. I don't have a particularly
powerful PC (stats below) but I've run 2.6 on even lower specced PCs with no
issue, therefore 2.7 must be introducing some significant additional
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
2. We need to define a usable plugin browser. One of the features I'm
missing the most, is a preview image. Plugins should have an option to
register a preview image of their effect (probably by having the
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Dave for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
I experienced lag on brush strokes with CPU utilization maxing out at 100% (it
was always high even with 2.6) but is bad enough that I've reverted back to
2.6.10. Single or multi window interface didn't make much difference so I
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:58 PM, LightningIsMyName
lightningismyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
2. We need to define a usable plugin browser. One of the features I'm
missing the most, is a preview image. Plugins should
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:27:59 +0200
Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think registering a fixed preview image is good enough, it
should be a preview of the effect if applied to the current image.
Just my 2c. The problem with a preview of the current image is that it
is not
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:27:59 +0200
Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think registering a fixed preview image is good enough, it
should be a preview of the effect if applied to the current image.
..
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 10:17 +0200, Dave wrote:
I experienced lag on brush strokes with CPU utilization maxing out at 100%
Do you have compositing on? (e.g. do windows have a drop shadow round
them?)
Turning that off helps a lot on my laptop.
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C,
On 10.08.2010 00:16, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 9 August 2010 23:42, yahvuuyah...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a quick and cheap thought:
if you're talking about search, that means i'm already using the keyboard to
type in
what i want to do, and then we're only one step away from a command line
within
Apologies to Alexia for being 'rude'. I simply found a forum and used it. :(
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by transforms being on or off. How/
where do I set this?
What more can I tell you about my set up that would help?
I use Ubuntu 10.4, with Gnome and compiz switched on. I use a
On 8/10/10, Dave wrote:
I've reinstalled 2.7.2 (not 2.7.3 as in the title). I don't like the
tapering effect of the 'Basic Dynamics' brush setting so I've created my own
that sets opacity only so as to emulate what I would typically use in 2.6.
However irrespective of the brush dynamic the
On 08/10/2010 10:28 AM, LightningIsMyName wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
2. We need to define a usable plugin browser. One of the features I'm
missing the most, is a preview image. Plugins should have an option to
register a preview image of
On 08/10/2010 11:57 AM, David Gowers wrote:
Create the previews in an idle handler
Just some nit-picking:
If you mean an idle handler in the event loop, that's a bad idea. We
should do image processing in a separate thread to keep the UI
responsive at all times. You could argue that if we
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 19:32:19, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Just because some plug-ins are too slow for live preview doesn't mean we
shouldn't have it for simpler plug-ins. Besides, we can have it for slow
plug-ins as well, we just do the preview calculations asyncronously. And
the
I only use the brush tool, mostly with hard round brushes any size typically
up to about 25 pixel radius, spacing 10. opacity on. no other brush dynamics
set. Smaller the brush the better the performance is.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 21:47:08, Dave wrote:
I only use the brush tool, mostly with hard round brushes any size typically
up to about 25 pixel radius, spacing 10. opacity on. no other brush dynamics
set. Smaller the brush the better the performance is.
Can you please fix your e-mail
probably he compile the a devel version - my previous compilation
reported itself as 2.7.3 but the newest is 2.7.2 ;)
2010/8/11 Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si:
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 21:47:08, Dave wrote:
I only use the brush tool, mostly with hard round brushes any size typically
up to
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010 22:47:08 Dave wrote:
I only use the brush tool, mostly with hard round brushes any size
typically up to about 25 pixel radius, spacing 10. opacity on. no other
brush dynamics set. Smaller the brush the better the performance is.
Do you use a tablet?
There are
Hi,
jer...@ena.si (2010-08-10 at 2227.15 +0200):
(also, where did you find GIMP 2.7.3? The latest 2.7 release is 2.7.1)
Unofficial releases claiming random numbers. Some even claim
things like:
... An update: actually, the version of the currently installed
unstable GIMP is 2.7.3-2010022601,
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 22:48:33, Alexia Death wrote:
He cant. He was using the forum client gimpusers has. He probably does not
have any mail to reply too...
In that case gimpusers should fix their forum client. I'm not that
bothered by the HTML, but having neither threads, nor quotes
Wow, guys, If you want to use the mailing list that's fine. but lets
remove the forum front end or make it read only so that we have a
standard. Don't beat me up over it.
I used the ubuntu ppa found here:
https://launchpad.net/~matthaeus123/+archive/mrw-gimp-svn
The version keeps changing.
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 01:27:48 Dave wrote:
Wow, guys, If you want to use the mailing list that's fine. but lets
remove the forum front end or make it read only so that we have a
standard. Don't beat me up over it.
We dont have control over what gimpusers have on their site as its a 3rd
In view of what Alexia just said:
Your problem is interesting, because its contrary to what I would expect and
experience myself. For me GIT version performs about twice as good as 2.6,
especially with large brushes, and thats with compositing on. To get the 25px
round brush to lag at all I have
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 02:58:56 David Gowers wrote:
[incidentally, 2.7 uses Cairo more for display related things (not for
rendering brushes IIRC, but of course in order to see the rendered
brush strokes, the area must be displayed). It's possible that this
impacts your system
Hi,
00a...@gmail.com (2010-08-11 at 0928.56 +0930):
I found myself, that redraws in paint programs were intolerably slow
until I added the
Here it was general. GIMP's interface took a couple of seconds to
redraw, but so did FF while scrolling (slideshowing would describe it
better).
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, GSR - FR fam...@infernal-iceberg.com wrote:
Hi,
00a...@gmail.com (2010-08-11 at 0928.56 +0930):
I found myself, that redraws in paint programs were intolerably slow
until I added the
Here it was general. GIMP's interface took a couple of seconds to
redraw,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM, David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, GSR - FR fam...@infernal-iceberg.com
wrote:
GIMP is a jerk (I get
cases where I draw a curve and the middle of it gets flattened into a
straight line); But I haven't been painting
28 matches
Mail list logo
