Seems my mail setup is broken. sending this the third time to the list...
Hi all,
Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 21 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Problem: Many tools instruct the
Hm, seems I've sent that mail to the old address before ...
---
Hi all,
Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 21 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Problem: Many tools instruct the core to destroy themselves on
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Raphael Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to help Daniel (and others, hopefully) by dealing with the bug
reports in bugzilla.
Have you already changed Bugzilla so it sends email about new bug-reports
and changes to existing
Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems I am not an administrator (or however this is called in Mozilla)
for the GIMP module. However when we first talked on IRC about moving
all bugs to Mozilla we talked about adding Daniel, Yosh, Sven and myself
as the initial administrators
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why I could not find a Gamma Correction plug-in in GIMP 1.2.x? Is Gamma
Correction patented in the US?
It's there: Image-Colors-Levels. The middle entry of the Input Values
corresponds to Gamma.
There
Hi,
answering both mails in one...
Kelly Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:57:50 +0100, Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* What are pango and atk, and why do we suddenly require them (if
indeed we do)?
Pango is the font layout and rendering system used by gtk+.
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We had an adequately generic GUI and most users couldn't
give a whit about the internal object model, but I can
see an attraction to hackers.
Well I find GIMP 1.2's UI not at all generic. The whole GIMP is a huge
pile of global variables and dialogs
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Natterer wrote:
Nick Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NB I am not blind and I don't write code in Hebrew
I respect your extraordinary tolerance regarding this, so please
respect that the people actually working on a project tend
David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 08:38:57PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
Hi,
I'm using current HEAD cvs of the Gimp.
I've seen that all the filter plugins which use a GTK interface are
crashing. Is this a known bug and is this due to the switch to the
Hi Owen,
Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The GIMP currently does something a bit peculiar - it calls
gdk_get_use_xshm() and then passes the values it gets from this
to plugins, which call gdk_set_use_xshm().
I suppose the reasoning here is to propagate the command line
--no-xshm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 13 Nov, Michael Natterer wrote:
Be afraid!
It's shiny, it's new, it's unstable, it's b0rken, it's The GIMP 1.3 !!
Get ready for reorganized, not-yet-really-working sourcecode, compile
it, hack it, send patches and help making a new GIMP that kicks ass
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:32:08PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Get ready for reorganized, not-yet-really-working sourcecode, compile it,
hack it, send patches and help making a new GIMP that kicks ass.
I do feel a bit stupid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If width is unsigned and 10, then:
int new_width = MAX (width - 15, 1);
produces 4294967291, not 1.
This is clearly a bug in the code. There are sizes which are by
definition unsigned and code computes an negative value this is
about as harmful
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Gimp Devel.
First off, I started playing with GIMP 1.3 last night and it is awsome. The
1.4 stable series is going to be amazing.
Thanks ;)
I wanted to take this oppertunity, early in the devel work on 1.3 to restate
an old nagging feature request of
Hi Syngin,
syngin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The time has come to determine an index system for the new help package.
The entire help system will be changing (as previously determined) and
initial discussions with Sven have leaned toward an XML index and
precompiled HTML help files.
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes:
On 08 Jan 2002, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only feature I miss when I use GIMP is that of Photoshop's brush
cursors. In Photoshop, when you choose a 12pixel brush, your cursor becomes
a 12pixel
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1.2.2 definitely has the USE_LAPLACIAN code in, but it is not enabled.
The current developer head in CVS doesn't. I'm assuming that as part
of porting iscissors.c to the new tool model someone (Mitch/Sven?)
took the opportunity to strip out unused
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been following some instructions oriented toward photoshop that
talk of unsharpen mask settings including a radius of 0.3 or 0.8.
I notice that Gimp's implementation has a minimum radius of one.
I'm quite sure that it's just the UI which is limiting the
Marco Nierlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Natterer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been following some instructions oriented toward photoshop that
talk of unsharpen mask settings including a radius of 0.3 or 0.8.
I notice that Gimp's implementation has a minimum
David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've just discovered a segfault bug in the current HEAD CVS gimp.
To activate the bug: start gimp, select some rectangle area, use the
move tool, bang!
Oops :) I thought the tool_info's name was a nice unique string for
identifying the tool, but
Hi Rock,
sorry I did not comment on this earlier, I was quite busy since
returning from Guadec.
As mentioned in an earlier mail from Sven, we are not at all happy
with the introducion of plug-in tools and the ongoing exposure of the
internal object structure outside the core.
While I have no
Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 23 Apr 2002, Michael Natterer wrote:
Hi Rock,
sorry I did not comment on this earlier, I was quite busy since
returning from Guadec.
After a few weeks of silence, I figured that you didn't have anything
more to say, so I started
RaphaXl Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I propose to add a new field in PLUGIN_MAINTAINERS, containing only the
Bugzilla accounts (or list of accounts) that should be added to the CC list
if a bug is detected in the corresponding plug-in. This would usually be the
same address as the one
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Gordon Royle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the format of the GIMP gradient files?
this routine saves the gradient. You should be able to determine the
format from this info:
snip routine
Really? In
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I commented out the pointer_grab/ungrab in
paint_core_button_press() and release()
in app/paint_core.c (gimp 1.2.3)
and that makes my tablet work.
I literally only have a few minutes every other day to poke at this, so I
dont really
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:23:02AM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
this seems related to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6901
Did you try to remove just the GDK_POINTER_MOTION_HINT_MASK?
XInput drivers are known to send wrong motion
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Philip Brown wrote:
BTW, would you try gimp 1.3.7 (or CVS) and try if the problem still
persists there? If they behave different we'd have a hint how to
fix 1.2. If 1.3.7 has the effect too, we have a bug on both branches :(
I already tried.
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:19:07PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
..
I find it somewhat irritating, for example, that a button3 on my pen will
bring up a menu, that I can do nothing with , with the pen.
Not only can I do nothing with it: I have
David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently the shared memory region that gimp uses to communicate to
and from plugins is readable and writable by every user on the system.
This is not good. I don't know what data or control information gimp
puts in this shared region, but someone could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:36:26AM +, Owen wrote:
I apologize for this question
The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro
The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11
A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 30 Jan 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi Nathan,
when I updated my gimp tree this morning I was surprised to see this
commit:
2003-01-30 Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* app/tools/gimptoolgui.[ch]: GimpToolGui, a new class
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 00.47 schrieb Michael Natterer:
Is this a solution everybody can live with or did I miss something
obvious? If it sounds reasonable, we should go ahead, it's not even
an awful lot of work (the coding part, not writing the help
Jeff Trefftzs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I notice that I get lots of complaints about corrupt brush files when I
try to load .gih files from gimp-1.2.x into 1.3.20. Can somebody please
point me to the right place to discover the difference between the
gimp-1.2 .gih brushes and whatever
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:39:44PM +0200, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure that ergonomy was considered for Photoshop when they
chose Ctrl-Shift-Z for Redo... I do think it's overstating our
importance somewhat to
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to the roadmap proposed a few weeks ago, we should be in
feature freeze and we should have released 2.0rc1 by now. Also, the
old web site was supposed to be replaced by the new one in order to be
prepared to support the new release.
None
Piotr Legiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello
I wonder how the undo works in gimp?
I'm currently trying to write a little tool in java which operates on
big files (70-120MB) and wonder how to make undo memory efficient.
Lets say I change something in Curves dialog in gimp. It takes
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One question... do you think it would be worthwhile to make the
API change, document what needs to be done to change from the old
API to the new, and then have a number of people work on porting
the plug-ins? Each plug-in in itself would probably be a
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'm replying in 2 parts, because there were 2 different issues in
this mail.
Sven Neumann wrote:
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In
principle, someone who has the dependencies for a 2.0 build should
have everything they need to keep up
david gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
kevin:
you misunderstood.
it makes sense to store the Palettes as a list.. but not the contents of the
palettes. what i meant was that each GimpPalette has a GList of
GimpPaletteEntries.
GArray-based allocation would be one way to optimize memory
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to fix several bugs related to the usage of the status
bar in the image windows. There is bug #120175 proposing to update
the GimpStatusbar API, and bugs #51108 and #124040 that could be
easily solved by displaying help messages for all
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:15:38 +0100, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here are the priority levels that we need, 1 being the highest
priority:
1) Messages from interactive operations (short duration
Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings.
While trying to determine if I found a bug in the GIMP (or possibly
undocumented behaviour), I ran across what looks like a bit of redundant
code.
In the file app/pdb/convert_cmds.c around line 153 is an if statement
that checks for a
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I remember, it was because it adds a rather big dependency, and
people thought that gimp should come with at least one script interpreter
on it's own.
(These are not my arguments, I just repeat what I think was one of the
bigger points back
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
131965General
Deletion of layer with brightness-contract active
This is data loss but on the undo stack only. This is critical
but it shouldn't block the release. We don't seem to have much
clue what is going
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We could even consider having a quickish stable release after 2.2 with
just GeglImage replacing GimpLayer, which would give us a chance to
work out any wrinkles in that milestone before we start really relying
on it...
GeglImage can't replace GimpLayer,
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] The Mark Shuttleworth offer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:54:34 -0800
Kelly Martin wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
We could even consider having a quickish stable
Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
What requirements would the new PDB have?
There's a number of issues to be
Juhana Sadeharju [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are still using GIMP 1.2.3 then we don't want to hear from you
on the gimp-developer list. Update to 2.0 (at least) or keep quiet.
Hey, I just wanted to point out what usability problems we users have.
As
Hi,
I don't understand what you want... GIMP's Filter Pack plug-in
is apparently the same as photoshop's Variations...
What exactly do you miss?
ciao,
--mitch
khiraly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Im wondering, how powerfull is the plugin variations from photoshop.
Its really usefull for face
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
or (and I'd prefer that), we pass these settings to the plug-in in the
GPConfig message. This is a message that is sent to each plug-in when
it is started. We handle this in libgimp and allow the plug-in to
access the settings using a simple API. See for
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've just tried this with GIMP 2.2-pre2 from the Script-Fu console and
you are right that the reference handling is somewhat confusing.
Perhaps gimp_displays_reconnect() should hand the reference over to
the display just as gimp_display_new() does.
FYI, I opened a bug for this issue:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159051
Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've just tried this with GIMP 2.2-pre2 from the Script-Fu console and
you are right that the reference handling
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the same time I also added
gimp_palette_is_editable()
Would you also add gimp_gradient_is_editable() while you're at it?
ciao,
--mitch
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Neumann writes:
Mitch and me also agreed that we would like to do something about
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162385 and even get that
change into the stable branch. The fact that the file-chooser in GIMP
doesn't remember the last used
Volker Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I am about to compile the Gimp from CVS. Unfortunately it fails in file
gimp/app/pdb/fileops_cmds.c
as the include file
config/gimpconfig-path.h
cannot be found. It has been removed from CVS about 18 hours ago. Is
there a way to get around
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is MIDI contol available for OSX versions of the GIMP yet?
No, it is currently limited to the Linux OSS and ALSA sound
architectures. If you want to add support for OSX, feel free
to hack on modules/controller_midi.c.
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jakub Steiner wrote:
An inconsistency that came up while I was working on
something is the mouse wheel behavior. GIMP uses shift+scroll wheel to
zoom, Inkscape Ctrl+mousewheel. GIMP uses Alt+mousewheel to pan
horizontally, Inkscape
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The new GTK+ file-chooser can make use of gnome-vfs, if it is
available. I don't know about the details, but I assume that on win32,
a similar API exists and is probably used by win32 backend of the
file-chooser widget. The default behaviour of the
Alan Bailward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe when accessing files through gnome-vfs files are copied to the
local system and then opened so that plugins or file ops that need to
access the file directly can.
Regardless of how it's done, emphasis should be put on what the user
expects to
Hi,
Gimp CVS HEAD depends on GTK+ = 2.6.0 and Pango = 1.8.0 now.
Some changes which make use of the new features and/or remove ugly
hacks due to the lack of these features have already landed in CVS.
Happy hacking!
ciao,
--mitch
___
Gimp-developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:56:07PM -0800, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I really find it bad that you think those people are ignorant - not
everybody can (or even will) read the source to find hidden keyboard
shortcuts. That is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Michael Natterer [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
Some problems might be caused by misdesigns in gtk+, but not all.
Ah, So which problem you have
This is fixed in CVS in the meantime.
ciao,
--mitch
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 18:36 +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
Hi,
I got the following error:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -DXTHREADS
-I/usr/include/gtkhtml-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/include/libxml2
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 22:59 -0500, Tim E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote:
I'm running gimp-2.3.2. Thank you for the snap to canvas edge option. I
would suggest that it should default to on/checked. Snap to Guides is
defaulted to on, the canvas edge should be considered a default guide (in
fact, that
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 01:19 -0300, Roberto Winter wrote:
hi.
as i saved a file just now gimp crashed. i had it built from cvs some
10 days ago (gcc 3.3.5).
i'm using debian unstable, e16 window manager, nvidia drivers 8178 on
xorg and kernel 2.6.13.1.
on the terminal i got:
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 14:33 +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Howdy gimp hackers!
I have refreshed the look of GIMP's mascot as an app icon and propose
this to be included upstream. The icon follows the Tango Style
Guidelines [1] (to a great extent) but is mostly based on the original
shape and
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:54 +, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
I recently wrote this plugin for my own amusement;
someone else might find a reasonably use for it.
It probably does something very similar to the
'antialias' plugin for GIMP 1.2, except this is for
GIMP 2.0 (2.X?)
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:22 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Probably yes, but from what I remember, Shift + Click works in several
more parts of GIMP's UI. If so, changing it would break consistence.
I am not sure in what way? Yes, there are other commands that are
altered
by
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 02:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure that this is a bug so I thought I would mention it here.
The PDB function 'gimp-channel-combine-masks' does not appear to
register with the UNDO history. Perhaps it is not supposed to since it
does not modify the
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 08:08 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Nathan Summers wrote:
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:52:44 -0400
From: Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Not Photoshop gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re:
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 23:16 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 19:54 schrieben Sie:
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:48 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
selection by using an internal gimp
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 19:54 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote:
While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no
chance to clear up if it's killed outright,
Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:36 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
I just stumbled across the next level in annoyance, resizing does only work
when grabbing one of the horizontal delimiter lines, using the vertical
delimiters seems to be blocked by some aspect ratio calcuations - Bug
#348807.
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 12:15 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
On Friday 28 July 2006 11:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Karl Günter Wünsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's why I would like to update the cursor position after all of
the calculations are through to reflect the results.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 01:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and
marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status
bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened
Alonso Ferrer for this nice contribution!
ciao,
--mitch
2006-09-07 Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merged the soc-2006-perspective-clone branch. That branch is
now officially closed and all further fixes and changes have to
be applied to HEAD.
Did some minor
Hi all,
I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that
can happen when clicking the image to the image window's statusbar,
using the new gimp_statusbar_push_temp() API.
While doing so I noticed they are all bad and inconsistent.
Here is the full list, grouped by reason of the
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 21:25 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:03:30 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:02 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that
can happen when clicking the image
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I dont
think that makes sense to the user. I covered that in a reply to Sven.
Aha... so which of
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer
Aha... so which of the tools under Transform Tool is not doing
a transform? I don't see any that wouldn't perfectly fit into
the category.
ciao,
--mitch
Mitch
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:48 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see
any logic
in having the selection tools possessing the ability to move
selection
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 01:04 +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Philip Ganchev wrote:
On 10/12/06, Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The two major use cases when this would be a more efficient interface is
for us GIMPers who already know what functionality they want and don't
need to
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 19:52 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
Checking the UI again, if there is any confusion as to the function of
, shouldn't get a tooltip saying 'Tear off this
menu'?
As Sven said, discussing this here makes no sense whatsoever, please
bring it up on a gtk
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:43 +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
Milos Prudek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
After successfully compiling gimp-2.3.13, on Mandriva 2007.0, Gimp fails to
run with this error message:
/usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3:
undefined
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 02:04 +0800, howard chen wrote:
I just want to modify a plugin file (*c) in the common folder,
currently, when I modified the file, I use `make make install` to
compile, link and install the GIMP.
But this take some times to test the feature, are there any better
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:14 +0800, howard chen wrote:
On 11/29/06, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 02:04 +0800, howard chen wrote:
I just want to modify a plugin file (*c) in the common folder,
currently, when I modified the file, I use `make make install
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 22:06 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to do the following change to the comment at the top of all
source files in the GIMP tree:
-/* The GIMP -- an image manipulation program
+/* GNU Image Manipulation Program
I agree that old line sounds stupid (an), but
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
Sven wrote:
(3) Should gimp-remote still be built and installed even if the d-bus
functionality is built into the gimp exectuable? The patch currently
doesn't change this, it just removes the reference to gimp-remote from
the
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 01:35 +0100, Thomas Andersen wrote:
hi,
we are writing to you because either your name was included in the
MAINTAINERS file of your module in GNOME SVN, or in the AUTHORS file,
or because most bugs in GNOME's bugzilla were assigned to you.
we are currently trying to
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I grabbed a fresh gimp cvs tree and just did Project Import in kdev. There
were a couple of caveats to get it to compile with a different --prefix
and with -O0 -g instead of the standard -O2 so I got variable debugging.
This
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:23 -0700, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:57 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
As far as I understand the dialog doesn't show absolute values for
Saturation and Lightness but relative ones. Perhaps the Saturation
slider should also go from -100 to +100
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that concerns me with Gimp development in general and of which
these changes are a good example is lack of concern for backwards
compatability.
A lot of people have contributed in one way or another to gimp over time
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your explaination. This is what I gathered from Alexandre's
post but I got a msg saying that target did not exist :?
you don't have make maintainer-clean because at some point
after you said ./autogen.sh, you did
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:44 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:16:43PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your explaination. This is what I gathered from Alexandre's
post but I got a msg saying
Hi,
The file was missing from po-script-fu/POTFILES.in
All files containing translatable strings need to be listed there,
so it's not your fault.
I've added it now, just svn update
ciao,
--mitch
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 11:39 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Hi, I'm not a real programmer/developer,
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 15:16 +0200, Van Aarde Krynauw wrote:
Greetings,
I'm glad to see that GIMP is incorporating a brush scaling mechanism.
I've been waiting for a long time for something like this! Although,
it would be nice if the brush can scale up and down, instead of simply
scaling
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
to simply rememebr the person on the other sidee is sitll a human
being, is not it? Not less human for having less abilities to
compile/hack
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 10:00 -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
Acually the thing that struck me was that the answer from Mitch
was not only a little rude (which is unusual for Mitch), it was
also a bad answer -- it doesn't make sense to download the source
code just to find out what language it is
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:02 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
Hi,
What's the best way to render gimp image to GdkPixbuf (which in turn
can be rendered to GdkWindow)? The GdkPixbuf would contain the same
pixels as if they were rendered with Gimp on GdkWindow (display
filters, color management,
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 10:45 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
On 3/22/07, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say making a screenshot and loading the resulting file with
gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file() is probably the easiest way.
I would like to implement something like
GdkPixbuf
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
