[Michael Natterer mitch@gimp.org] Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: RFC: eliminating tool destruction and adding better caching support

2001-02-24 Thread Michael Natterer
Seems my mail setup is broken. sending this the third time to the list... Hi all, Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 21 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann wrote: Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Problem: Many tools instruct the

[Michael Natterer mitch@gimp.org] Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: RFC: eliminating tool destruction and adding better caching support

2001-02-25 Thread Michael Natterer
Hm, seems I've sent that mail to the old address before ... --- Hi all, Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 21 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann wrote: Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Problem: Many tools instruct the core to destroy themselves on

Re: [Gimp-developer] Win32 compilation problems..

2001-03-12 Thread Michael Natterer
Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jason Maskell writes: I am trying off and on to get the win32 port to compile under VC++ 6, and I've got some more problems... Are you compiling from CVS (and if from CVS, the gimp-1-2 or HEAD branch?), or from the gimp-src-20001226.zip snapshot

Re: [Gimp-developer] Help needed with unconfirmed gimp bugs (especially for Windows)

2001-04-25 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Raphael Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to help Daniel (and others, hopefully) by dealing with the bug reports in bugzilla. Have you already changed Bugzilla so it sends email about new bug-reports and changes to existing

Re: [Gimp-developer] Help needed with unconfirmed gimp bugs (especially for Windows)

2001-04-25 Thread Michael Natterer
Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seems I am not an administrator (or however this is called in Mozilla) for the GIMP module. However when we first talked on IRC about moving all bugs to Mozilla we talked about adding Daniel, Yosh, Sven and myself as the initial administrators

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP and Gamma Correction?

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why I could not find a Gamma Correction plug-in in GIMP 1.2.x? Is Gamma Correction patented in the US? It's there: Image-Colors-Levels. The middle entry of the Input Values corresponds to Gamma. There

Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port

2001-07-25 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi, answering both mails in one... Kelly Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:57:50 +0100, Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: * What are pango and atk, and why do we suddenly require them (if indeed we do)? Pango is the font layout and rendering system used by gtk+.

Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port

2001-07-26 Thread Michael Natterer
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We had an adequately generic GUI and most users couldn't give a whit about the internal object model, but I can see an attraction to hackers. Well I find GIMP 1.2's UI not at all generic. The whole GIMP is a huge pile of global variables and dialogs

Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port

2001-07-27 Thread Michael Natterer
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael Natterer wrote: Nick Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: NB I am not blind and I don't write code in Hebrew I respect your extraordinary tolerance regarding this, so please respect that the people actually working on a project tend

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: current gimp status and a patch for apply_lens.

2001-08-27 Thread Michael Natterer
David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 08:38:57PM +0200, David Odin wrote: Hi, I'm using current HEAD cvs of the Gimp. I've seen that all the filter plugins which use a GTK interface are crashing. Is this a known bug and is this due to the switch to the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gdk_set/get_use_xshm()

2001-09-05 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi Owen, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The GIMP currently does something a bit peculiar - it calls gdk_get_use_xshm() and then passes the values it gets from this to plugins, which call gdk_set_use_xshm(). I suppose the reasoning here is to propagate the command line --no-xshm

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.0

2001-11-13 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 13 Nov, Michael Natterer wrote: Be afraid! It's shiny, it's new, it's unstable, it's b0rken, it's The GIMP 1.3 !! Get ready for reorganized, not-yet-really-working sourcecode, compile it, hack it, send patches and help making a new GIMP that kicks ass

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.0

2001-11-13 Thread Michael Natterer
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:32:08PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: Get ready for reorganized, not-yet-really-working sourcecode, compile it, hack it, send patches and help making a new GIMP that kicks ass. I do feel a bit stupid

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: your so called optimizations and why we don't like them

2001-12-03 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If width is unsigned and 10, then: int new_width = MAX (width - 15, 1); produces 4294967291, not 1. This is clearly a bug in the code. There are sizes which are by definition unsigned and code computes an negative value this is about as harmful

Re: [Gimp-developer] Current work

2001-12-06 Thread Michael Natterer
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've spent a bazillion hours this year on partial rewrites of the INDEXED-RGB quantization, mostly to improve quality but partly to abstract the code away from its RGB8-centricity. It's all been off-tree however until I thought it was ready; it was

Re: [Gimp-developer] Trivial patch to create Erode Dilate menu items

2001-12-06 Thread Michael Natterer
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, I've attached a pretty trivial patch which creates Erode and Dilate menu items. These are basically the vpropagate plug-in called with default values. This stems from me spending about an hour looking for this functionality today and not

Re: [Gimp-developer] Feature Request for 1.3

2002-01-08 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Gimp Devel. First off, I started playing with GIMP 1.3 last night and it is awsome. The 1.4 stable series is going to be amazing. Thanks ;) I wanted to take this oppertunity, early in the devel work on 1.3 to restate an old nagging feature request of

Re: [Gimp-developer] Help file index RFC

2002-01-08 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi Syngin, syngin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The time has come to determine an index system for the new help package. The entire help system will be changing (as previously determined) and initial discussions with Sven have leaned toward an XML index and precompiled HTML help files. The

Re: [Gimp-developer] Feature Request for 1.3

2002-01-08 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes: On 08 Jan 2002, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The only feature I miss when I use GIMP is that of Photoshop's brush cursors. In Photoshop, when you choose a 12pixel brush, your cursor becomes a 12pixel

Re: [Gimp-developer] intelligent scissors

2002-01-15 Thread Michael Natterer
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1.2.2 definitely has the USE_LAPLACIAN code in, but it is not enabled. The current developer head in CVS doesn't. I'm assuming that as part of porting iscissors.c to the new tool model someone (Mitch/Sven?) took the opportunity to strip out unused

Re: [Gimp-developer] unsharpen mask radius 1.0

2002-01-15 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been following some instructions oriented toward photoshop that talk of unsharpen mask settings including a radius of 0.3 or 0.8. I notice that Gimp's implementation has a minimum radius of one. I'm quite sure that it's just the UI which is limiting the

Re: [Gimp-developer] unsharpen mask radius 1.0

2002-01-16 Thread Michael Natterer
Marco Nierlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael Natterer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been following some instructions oriented toward photoshop that talk of unsharpen mask settings including a radius of 0.3 or 0.8. I notice that Gimp's implementation has a minimum

[Gimp-developer] Re: cvs gimp segfault in gimp_tool_pop_status

2002-02-04 Thread Michael Natterer
David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I've just discovered a segfault bug in the current HEAD CVS gimp. To activate the bug: start gimp, select some rectangle area, use the move tool, bang! Oops :) I thought the tool_info's name was a nice unique string for identifying the tool, but

[Gimp-developer] Tool Plug-In Changes

2002-04-23 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi Rock, sorry I did not comment on this earlier, I was quite busy since returning from Guadec. As mentioned in an earlier mail from Sven, we are not at all happy with the introducion of plug-in tools and the ongoing exposure of the internal object structure outside the core. While I have no

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tool Plug-In Changes

2002-04-25 Thread Michael Natterer
Nathan C Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 23 Apr 2002, Michael Natterer wrote: Hi Rock, sorry I did not comment on this earlier, I was quite busy since returning from Guadec. After a few weeks of silence, I figured that you didn't have anything more to say, so I started

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: add Bugzilla contact info in PLUGIN_MAINTAINERS

2002-04-26 Thread Michael Natterer
RaphaXl Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I propose to add a new field in PLUGIN_MAINTAINERS, containing only the Bugzilla accounts (or list of accounts) that should be added to the CC list if a bug is detected in the corresponding plug-in. This would usually be the same address as the one

Re: [Gimp-developer] Format of GIMP gradient files

2002-05-30 Thread Michael Natterer
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Gordon Royle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the format of the GIMP gradient files? this routine saves the gradient. You should be able to determine the format from this info: snip routine Really? In

Re: [Gimp-developer] new xinput device: no movement when button down

2002-06-05 Thread Michael Natterer
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, I commented out the pointer_grab/ungrab in paint_core_button_press() and release() in app/paint_core.c (gimp 1.2.3) and that makes my tablet work. I literally only have a few minutes every other day to poke at this, so I dont really

Re: [Gimp-developer] new xinput device: no movement when button down

2002-06-05 Thread Michael Natterer
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:23:02AM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote: this seems related to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 Did you try to remove just the GDK_POINTER_MOTION_HINT_MASK? XInput drivers are known to send wrong motion

Re: [Gimp-developer] new xinput device: no movement when button down

2002-06-06 Thread Michael Natterer
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Philip Brown wrote: BTW, would you try gimp 1.3.7 (or CVS) and try if the problem still persists there? If they behave different we'd have a hint how to fix 1.2. If 1.3.7 has the effect too, we have a bug on both branches :( I already tried.

Re: [Gimp-developer] new xinput device: no movement when button down

2002-06-06 Thread Michael Natterer
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:19:07PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote: .. I find it somewhat irritating, for example, that a button3 on my pen will bring up a menu, that I can do nothing with , with the pen. Not only can I do nothing with it: I have

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp security bug, shared memory

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Natterer
David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Currently the shared memory region that gimp uses to communicate to and from plugins is readable and writable by every user on the system. This is not good. I don't know what data or control information gimp puts in this shared region, but someone could

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why modules interface?

2003-01-22 Thread Michael Natterer
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I want to add some features (changeing the gamma of the display ...) to filmgimp. There already is a module called cdisplay-gamma which can do this. You don't need to write any code, just use this pre-existing module. The best idea IMHO would be

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size

2003-01-28 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes: On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:36:26AM +, Owen wrote: I apologize for this question The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11 A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpToolGui

2003-01-31 Thread Michael Natterer
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 30 Jan 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi Nathan, when I updated my gimp tree this morning I was surprised to see this commit: 2003-01-30 Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] * app/tools/gimptoolgui.[ch]: GimpToolGui, a new class

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

2003-08-20 Thread Michael Natterer
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Mit, 2003-08-20 um 00.47 schrieb Michael Natterer: Is this a solution everybody can live with or did I miss something obvious? If it sounds reasonable, we should go ahead, it's not even an awful lot of work (the coding part, not writing the help

Re: [Gimp-developer] Difference between 1.2 .gih and 1.3 .gih files?

2003-09-23 Thread Michael Natterer
Jeff Trefftzs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I notice that I get lots of complaints about corrupt brush files when I try to load .gih files from gimp-1.2.x into 1.3.20. Can somebody please point me to the right place to discover the difference between the gimp-1.2 .gih brushes and whatever

Re: [Gimp-developer] Redo shortcut

2003-09-26 Thread Michael Natterer
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marc A. Lehmann wrote: On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:39:44PM +0200, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure that ergonomy was considered for Photoshop when they chose Ctrl-Shift-Z for Redo... I do think it's overstating our importance somewhat to

Re: [Gimp-developer] When will we branch CVS gimp-2-0?

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Natterer
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: According to the roadmap proposed a few weeks ago, we should be in feature freeze and we should have released 2.0rc1 by now. Also, the old web site was supposed to be replaced by the new one in order to be prepared to support the new release. None

Re: [Gimp-developer] How the UNDO system works?

2003-10-29 Thread Michael Natterer
Piotr Legiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello I wonder how the undo works in gimp? I'm currently trying to write a little tool in java which operates on big files (70-120MB) and wonder how to make undo memory efficient. Lets say I change something in Curves dialog in gimp. It takes

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpDialog API change

2003-11-06 Thread Michael Natterer
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One question... do you think it would be worthwhile to make the API change, document what needs to be done to change from the old API to the new, and then have a number of people work on porting the plug-ins? Each plug-in in itself would probably be a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Friends of GNOME

2003-12-20 Thread Michael Natterer
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I'm replying in 2 parts, because there were 2 different issues in this mail. Sven Neumann wrote: David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In principle, someone who has the dependencies for a 2.0 build should have everything they need to keep up

Re: [Gimp-developer] Friends of GIMP

2004-01-01 Thread Michael Natterer
david gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: kevin: you misunderstood. it makes sense to store the Palettes as a list.. but not the contents of the palettes. what i meant was that each GimpPalette has a GList of GimpPaletteEntries. GArray-based allocation would be one way to optimize memory

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for fixing the GimpStatusbar API

2004-01-13 Thread Michael Natterer
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would like to fix several bugs related to the usage of the status bar in the image windows. There is bug #120175 proposing to update the GimpStatusbar API, and bugs #51108 and #124040 that could be easily solved by displaying help messages for all

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for fixing the GimpStatusbar API

2004-01-14 Thread Michael Natterer
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:15:38 +0100, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here are the priority levels that we need, 1 being the highest priority: 1) Messages from interactive operations (short duration

Re: [Gimp-developer] Redundant code in image_convert_indexed_invoker()?

2004-01-31 Thread Michael Natterer
Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greetings. While trying to determine if I found a bug in the GIMP (or possibly undocumented behaviour), I ran across what looks like a bit of redundant code. In the file app/pdb/convert_cmds.c around line 153 is an if statement that checks for a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Natterer
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As far as I remember, it was because it adds a rather big dependency, and people thought that gimp should come with at least one script interpreter on it's own. (These are not my arguments, I just repeat what I think was one of the bigger points back

Re: [Gimp-developer] Bugs on milestone 2.0

2004-03-10 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 131965General Deletion of layer with brightness-contract active This is data loss but on the undo stack only. This is critical but it shouldn't block the release. We don't seem to have much clue what is going

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Mark Shuttleworth offer

2004-03-19 Thread Michael Natterer
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We could even consider having a quickish stable release after 2.2 with just GeglImage replacing GimpLayer, which would give us a chance to work out any wrinkles in that milestone before we start really relying on it... GeglImage can't replace GimpLayer,

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Mark Shuttleworth offer

2004-03-19 Thread Michael Natterer
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] The Mark Shuttleworth offer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:54:34 -0800 Kelly Martin wrote: Dave Neary wrote: We could even consider having a quickish stable

Re: [Gimp-developer] PDB requirements (was: PDB named and default parameters)

2004-03-26 Thread Michael Natterer
Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote: On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote: What requirements would the new PDB have? There's a number of issues to be

Re: [Gimp-developer] PDB requirements

2004-03-26 Thread Michael Natterer
Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote: On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Usability test - Results available

2004-06-11 Thread Michael Natterer
Juhana Sadeharju [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are still using GIMP 1.2.3 then we don't want to hear from you on the gimp-developer list. Update to 2.0 (at least) or keep quiet. Hey, I just wanted to point out what usability problems we users have. As

Re: [Gimp-developer] photoshop like variations Gimp plugin proposal

2004-07-22 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi, I don't understand what you want... GIMP's Filter Pack plug-in is apparently the same as photoshop's Variations... What exactly do you miss? ciao, --mitch khiraly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Im wondering, how powerfull is the plugin variations from photoshop. Its really usefull for face

[Gimp-developer] Extending GPConfig (was: Should the checkerboard be linked to the window or to the image?)

2004-09-02 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: or (and I'd prefer that), we pass these settings to the plug-in in the GPConfig message. This is a message that is sent to each plug-in when it is started. We handle this in libgimp and allow the plug-in to access the settings using a simple API. See for

Re: [Gimp-developer] Image reference count problem in plugin

2004-11-22 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I've just tried this with GIMP 2.2-pre2 from the Script-Fu console and you are right that the reference handling is somewhat confusing. Perhaps gimp_displays_reconnect() should hand the reference over to the display just as gimp_display_new() does.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Image reference count problem in plugin

2004-11-22 Thread Michael Natterer
FYI, I opened a bug for this issue: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159051 Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I've just tried this with GIMP 2.2-pre2 from the Script-Fu console and you are right that the reference handling

Re: [Gimp-developer] generated brush api for the pdb

2004-12-30 Thread Michael Natterer
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At the same time I also added gimp_palette_is_editable() Would you also add gimp_gradient_is_editable() while you're at it? ciao, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu

Re: [Gimp-developer] Save As remembering last dir

2005-01-12 Thread Michael Natterer
Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Neumann writes: Mitch and me also agreed that we would like to do something about http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162385 and even get that change into the stable branch. The fact that the file-chooser in GIMP doesn't remember the last used

Re: [Gimp-developer] Compilation fails

2005-01-26 Thread Michael Natterer
Volker Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I am about to compile the Gimp from CVS. Unfortunately it fails in file gimp/app/pdb/fileops_cmds.c as the include file config/gimpconfig-path.h cannot be found. It has been removed from CVS about 18 hours ago. Is there a way to get around

Re: [Gimp-developer] MIDI control OSX

2005-02-03 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is MIDI contol available for OSX versions of the GIMP yet? No, it is currently limited to the Linux OSS and ALSA sound architectures. If you want to add support for OSX, feel free to hack on modules/controller_midi.c.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Inkscape-devel] common interface for graphics apps on thefree desktop

2005-02-04 Thread Michael Natterer
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jakub Steiner wrote: An inconsistency that came up while I was working on something is the mouse wheel behavior. GIMP uses shift+scroll wheel to zoom, Inkscape Ctrl+mousewheel. GIMP uses Alt+mousewheel to pan horizontally, Inkscape

Re: [Gimp-developer] file handling, something for GIMP 2.4 ?

2005-02-06 Thread Michael Natterer
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The new GTK+ file-chooser can make use of gnome-vfs, if it is available. I don't know about the details, but I assume that on win32, a similar API exists and is probably used by win32 backend of the file-chooser widget. The default behaviour of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] file handling, something for GIMP 2.4 ?

2005-02-07 Thread Michael Natterer
Alan Bailward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe when accessing files through gnome-vfs files are copied to the local system and then opened so that plugins or file ops that need to access the file directly can. Regardless of how it's done, emphasis should be put on what the user expects to

[Gimp-developer] GTK+ 2.6, Pango 1.8

2005-02-08 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi, Gimp CVS HEAD depends on GTK+ = 2.6.0 and Pango = 1.8.0 now. Some changes which make use of the new features and/or remove ugly hacks due to the lack of these features have already landed in CVS. Happy hacking! ciao, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] CVS HEAD dependency on glib-2.6 / gtk+-2.6

2005-02-10 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes: On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:56:07PM -0800, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really find it bad that you think those people are ignorant - not everybody can (or even will) read the source to find hidden keyboard shortcuts. That is

Re: [Gimp-developer] CVS HEAD dependency on glib-2.6 / gtk+-2.6

2005-02-11 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes: On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes: Some problems might be caused by misdesigns in gtk+, but not all. Ah, So which problem you have

Re: [Gimp-developer] Failed to compile the CVS (ChangeLog 1.11096)

2005-06-04 Thread Michael Natterer
This is fixed in CVS in the meantime. ciao, --mitch On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 18:36 +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Hi, I got the following error: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtkhtml-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2

Re: [Gimp-developer] Snap To Canvas

2005-07-12 Thread Michael Natterer
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 22:59 -0500, Tim E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote: I'm running gimp-2.3.2. Thank you for the snap to canvas edge option. I would suggest that it should default to on/checked. Snap to Guides is defaulted to on, the canvas edge should be considered a default guide (in fact, that

Re: [Gimp-developer] crash after saving tif

2006-03-25 Thread Michael Natterer
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 01:19 -0300, Roberto Winter wrote: hi. as i saved a file just now gimp crashed. i had it built from cvs some 10 days ago (gcc 3.3.5). i'm using debian unstable, e16 window manager, nvidia drivers 8178 on xorg and kernel 2.6.13.1. on the terminal i got:

Re: [Gimp-developer] app icon update proposal

2006-03-27 Thread Michael Natterer
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 14:33 +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote: Howdy gimp hackers! I have refreshed the look of GIMP's mascot as an app icon and propose this to be included upstream. The icon follows the Tango Style Guidelines [1] (to a great extent) but is mostly based on the original shape and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Auntie Alias plugin

2006-05-10 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:54 +, Adam D. Moss wrote: Hi guys and gals, I recently wrote this plugin for my own amusement; someone else might find a reasonably use for it. It probably does something very similar to the 'antialias' plugin for GIMP 1.2, except this is for GIMP 2.0 (2.X?)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'Newlayer'commanddefaultto'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:22 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: Probably yes, but from what I remember, Shift + Click works in several more parts of GIMP's UI. If so, changing it would break consistence. I am not sure in what way? Yes, there are other commands that are altered by

Re: [Gimp-developer] Combine masks UNDO history

2006-05-26 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 02:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not sure that this is a bug so I thought I would mention it here. The PDB function 'gimp-channel-combine-masks' does not appear to register with the UNDO history. Perhaps it is not supposed to since it does not modify the

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

2006-05-27 Thread Michael Natterer
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 08:08 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: On Fri, 26 May 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:52:44 -0400 From: Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Not Photoshop gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re:

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-python: checking if point is in selection

2006-06-02 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 23:16 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote: Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 19:54 schrieben Sie: Hi, On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:48 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote: i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given selection by using an internal gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Cancel function and plugins

2006-06-07 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 19:54 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote: While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no chance to clear up if it's killed outright, Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: It's getting worse... Now I really want the old rect selection tool back!

2006-07-26 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:36 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote: I just stumbled across the next level in annoyance, resizing does only work when grabbing one of the horizontal delimiter lines, using the vertical delimiters seems to be blocked by some aspect ratio calcuations - Bug #348807.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Is there a way to update the cursor position from within a tool?

2006-07-28 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 12:15 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote: On Friday 28 July 2006 11:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Karl Günter Wünsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That's why I would like to update the cursor position after all of the calculations are through to reflect the results.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-02 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 01:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened

[Gimp-developer] soc-2006-perspective-clone branch merged and closed

2006-09-08 Thread Michael Natterer
Alonso Ferrer for this nice contribution! ciao, --mitch 2006-09-07 Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Merged the soc-2006-perspective-clone branch. That branch is now officially closed and all further fixes and changes have to be applied to HEAD. Did some minor

Re: [Gimp-developer] Adobe Illustrator to GIMP palette converter

2006-09-20 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 08:40 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:31 +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote: I'll give it a shot (already have the file open and have started to edit it). Although I should probably ask elsewhere, would I be better to create an external module

[Gimp-developer] Tool statusbar error messages

2006-09-26 Thread Michael Natterer
Hi all, I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that can happen when clicking the image to the image window's statusbar, using the new gimp_statusbar_push_temp() API. While doing so I noticed they are all bad and inconsistent. Here is the full list, grouped by reason of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tool statusbar error messages

2006-09-27 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 21:25 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:03:30 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:02 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote: I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that can happen when clicking the image

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-28 Thread Michael Natterer
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I dont think that makes sense to the user. I covered that in a reply to Sven. Aha... so which of

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-28 Thread Michael Natterer
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer Aha... so which of the tools under Transform Tool is not doing a transform? I don't see any that wouldn't perfectly fit into the category. ciao, --mitch Mitch

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-28 Thread Michael Natterer
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:48 +0930, David Gowers wrote: On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see any logic in having the selection tools possessing the ability to move selection

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-13 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 01:04 +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote: Philip Ganchev wrote: On 10/12/06, Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The two major use cases when this would be a more efficient interface is for us GIMPers who already know what functionality they want and don't need to

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread Michael Natterer
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 19:52 +0930, David Gowers wrote: Checking the UI again, if there is any confusion as to the function of , shouldn't get a tooltip saying 'Tear off this menu'? As Sven said, discussing this here makes no sense whatsoever, please bring it up on a gtk

Re: [Gimp-developer] Successfull compile, will not run

2006-11-27 Thread Michael Natterer
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:43 +0100, Simon Budig wrote: Milos Prudek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: After successfully compiling gimp-2.3.13, on Mandriva 2007.0, Gimp fails to run with this error message: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: undefined

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] Question abt compling GIMP

2006-11-28 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 02:04 +0800, howard chen wrote: I just want to modify a plugin file (*c) in the common folder, currently, when I modified the file, I use `make make install` to compile, link and install the GIMP. But this take some times to test the feature, are there any better

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] Question abt compling GIMP

2006-11-30 Thread Michael Natterer
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:14 +0800, howard chen wrote: On 11/29/06, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 02:04 +0800, howard chen wrote: I just want to modify a plugin file (*c) in the common folder, currently, when I modified the file, I use `make make install

Re: [Gimp-developer] The GIMP

2006-12-07 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 22:06 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, I'd like to do the following change to the comment at the top of all source files in the GIMP tree: -/* The GIMP -- an image manipulation program +/* GNU Image Manipulation Program I agree that old line sounds stupid (an), but

Re: [Gimp-developer] replacing gimp-remote

2007-01-19 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, William Skaggs wrote: Sven wrote: (3) Should gimp-remote still be built and installed even if the d-bus functionality is built into the gimp exectuable? The patch currently doesn't change this, it just removes the reference to gimp-remote from the

Re: [Gimp-developer] removing gimp-plugin-template from GNOME SVN

2007-01-23 Thread Michael Natterer
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 01:35 +0100, Thomas Andersen wrote: hi, we are writing to you because either your name was included in the MAINTAINERS file of your module in GNOME SVN, or in the AUTHORS file, or because most bugs in GNOME's bugzilla were assigned to you. we are currently trying to

Re: [Gimp-developer] kdevelop and gimp

2007-01-26 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I grabbed a fresh gimp cvs tree and just did Project Import in kdev. There were a couple of caveats to get it to compile with a different --prefix and with -O0 -g instead of the standard -O2 so I got variable debugging. This

Re: [Gimp-developer] Colorize - Lightness != luminosity?

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:23 -0700, Michael J. Hammel wrote: On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:57 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: As far as I understand the dialog doesn't show absolute values for Saturation and Lightness but relative ones. Perhaps the Saturation slider should also go from -100 to +100

Re: [Gimp-developer] changes in script-fu in 2.3.14

2007-02-16 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing that concerns me with Gimp development in general and of which these changes are a good example is lack of concern for backwards compatability. A lot of people have contributed in one way or another to gimp over time

Re: [Gimp-developer] prefix issues

2007-02-27 Thread Michael Natterer
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your explaination. This is what I gathered from Alexandre's post but I got a msg saying that target did not exist :? you don't have make maintainer-clean because at some point after you said ./autogen.sh, you did

Re: [Gimp-developer] prefix issues

2007-02-27 Thread Michael Natterer
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:44 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote: On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:16:43PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your explaination. This is what I gathered from Alexandre's post but I got a msg saying

  1   2   >