Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Well, in the contribs for 9.0 I can see only 1.3.8, but maybe the mirror I am using is not updated: which is your mirror? Well it's 9.2/contrib for me then in your case you probably needs two repository : 9.2/sources to get the stuff from standard Mandrake 9.2 and 9.2/contrib tu get Gimp2. You can't use contribs 9.2 on mdk 9.0... :-(( dependencies would not be fullfilled and urpmi will not help you. Of course, if in the contribs they will provide a packaged version of gimp2, then urpmi would solve all problems (but for optimization, but of course I know that I can't get everything!) Maybe if I wait some weeks (after the release of the final 2.0), I will have some luck. If you install gimp-1.3.21 and gimp-1-3-21-devel from URPM repository the dependancies problem will be probably solved and then you could download and compil the last gimp-2.0 yourself without waiting a RPM in contrib. Even if you still need more recent libs you can get it from the 9.2/sources. On the other hand, this could be practicable: I will try it, as soon as I will have some spare time (at least 9 weeks... :-((( Fabio ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
B Now, I am completely happy with my system: am I forced to upgrade distribution just to be able to use gimp 2.0? This would really upset me. Note that the point is not that I am scared at upgrading the system: my first distro was RH 4.x and since I used at least one of any major release. The point is simply that for some month I will have no spare time for doing this... :-((( Did you try URPM ? in Contrib repository (not updated) I can see gimp 1.3.21, gimp-pyton 1.3.21, gimp2-freetype, gimp2-gap_20030730. I did'nt try myself because I prefer the compilation for Gimp2 but it's what Mandrake gives to their users. Well, in the contribs for 9.0 I can see only 1.3.8, but maybe the mirror I am using is not updated: which is your mirror? Of course, if in the contribs they will provide a packaged version of gimp2, then urpmi would solve all problems (but for optimization, but of course I know that I can't get everything!) Maybe if I wait some weeks (after the release of the final 2.0), I will have some luck. About the other point which is in discussion (introduction of a warning for updates), if my opinion can interest anybody I would say that I am against it. This for the simple reason that most of the time I use gimp at home, where I have simply a modem connection, which, of course, is most of the time of. But even at work I don't like autoupdates. In case you will install such a check, I wish that there will be a startup screen which will let the user to disabilitate it. Fabio ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Le mer 14/01/2004 à 11:54, Fabio S. a écrit : Well, in the contribs for 9.0 I can see only 1.3.8, but maybe the mirror I am using is not updated: which is your mirror? Well it's 9.2/contrib for me then in your case you probably needs two repository : 9.2/sources to get the stuff from standard Mandrake 9.2 and 9.2/contrib tu get Gimp2. Of course, if in the contribs they will provide a packaged version of gimp2, then urpmi would solve all problems (but for optimization, but of course I know that I can't get everything!) Maybe if I wait some weeks (after the release of the final 2.0), I will have some luck. If you install gimp-1.3.21 and gimp-1-3-21-devel from URPM repository the dependancies problem will be probably solved and then you could download and compil the last gimp-2.0 yourself without waiting a RPM in contrib. Even if you still need more recent libs you can get it from the 9.2/sources. @+ Raymond ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version gtkhtml1. You will need gtkhtml2 for the GIMP help browser plug-in. Wouldn't the libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk suffice? Isn't that what I said? I am sorry I don't know about the package names of Mandrake or RedHat or whatever distribution. I can only tell you what software you need. The translation to package names is up to you. It makes some time that I have a question and I couldn't find an answer anywhere. Forgive me if it seems stupid/faq/naif or whatelse. It seems that compiling a brand new gimp is no simple matter at all: following all dependencies is really a hard matter! Would it be possible to provide, together with the sources, also a static rpm (or tar.gz, if you prefer), which could install everywhere? I guess that it would be quite big, but maybe one can add a warning This is a static version: it is BAD. Use it only if you can't manage otherwise! But, for example, take my case: I have a mandrake 9.0. On it, I succeeded to compile gimp 1.2.5. I also tried to compile 1.3.x, but dependencies errors where so many that to correct them I needed to deeply change my system: it would have been faster to upgrade the distribution. I did nothing. I guess the same will be with gimp 2.0. Now, I am completely happy with my system: am I forced to upgrade distribution just to be able to use gimp 2.0? This would really upset me. Note that the point is not that I am scared at upgrading the system: my first distro was RH 4.x and since I used at least one of any major release. The point is simply that for some month I will have no spare time for doing this... :-((( Finally, let me just point out that what I am proposing is just what is being done for mozilla: I couldn't compile 1.5 it neither, yet they provide a binary version which installed painless on my system and works smoothly. Best regards Fabio ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Hi, Fabio S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems that compiling a brand new gimp is no simple matter at all: following all dependencies is really a hard matter! Almost all distributions that I know of have all the GIMP dependencies nicely packaged. Since GNOME2 has basically the same dependencies as GIMP2, gimp2 installs out of the box on a lot of computers. If you have problems to follow the dependencies (shouldn't your package manager do this for you?) I suggest you read the file INSTALL where we try to give you the necessary hints. Would it be possible to provide, together with the sources, also a static rpm (or tar.gz, if you prefer), which could install everywhere? I guess that it would be quite big, but maybe one can add a warning This is a static version: it is BAD. Use it only if you can't manage otherwise! Feel free to build such a static version. We, the GIMP developers, do not provide any binary versions whatsoever. We lack the time and the resources to build and maintain them. But, for example, take my case: I have a mandrake 9.0. On it, I succeeded to compile gimp 1.2.5. I also tried to compile 1.3.x, but dependencies errors where so many that to correct them I needed to deeply change my system: it would have been faster to upgrade the distribution. I did nothing. Sure. GIMP2 is a new version. It builds on new versions of the underlying libraries. We couldn't have improved GIMP without the improvements done in GTK2 etc. Fortunately you can install gimp-1.2 and gimp-2.0 and all its dependencies side by side so it's very unlikely that an update to gimp-2.0 will break any software that used to work before. You don't really need to change your system to update to gimp-2.0. You only need to add a couple of additional packages. If you are not willing to go this way, then you should probably wait a few weeks until packages for your distribution show up. If your distribution is hopelessly outdated you will have to face the fact that you will need to upgrade it or stick to the old software. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 05:47 am, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Fabio S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems that compiling a brand new gimp is no simple matter at all: following all dependencies is really a hard matter! Almost all distributions that I know of have all the GIMP dependencies nicely packaged. Since GNOME2 has basically the same dependencies as GIMP2, gimp2 installs out of the box on a lot of computers. If you have problems to follow the dependencies (shouldn't your package manager do this for you?) I suggest you read the file INSTALL where we try to give you the necessary hints. Would it be possible to provide, together with the sources, also a static rpm (or tar.gz, if you prefer), which could install everywhere? I guess that it would be quite big, but maybe one can add a warning This is a static version: it is BAD. Use it only if you can't manage otherwise! Feel free to build such a static version. We, the GIMP developers, do not provide any binary versions whatsoever. We lack the time and the resources to build and maintain them. [...] Sven ___ Fabio, Let me step in and add to Sven's explanations. Fabio, even if a static version existed, it would still not work with your older system. If you have managed to keep 9.0 as it was installed, without updating components, you would still not be able to run this nice new GTK+ program called The Gimp! At some point in any program's life, it has to move on, get away from the old for the betterment of the program. As a user of Linux, you should understand that better than user's of other OS's! You don't have to update, you can run what you have for years, that's the beauty of Linux, but if having newer better is a thing you prefer, then you need a newer better base to use it. As Sven said, most all new distros are equipped to compile Gimp 2.x and if you want to see it run, either view it on someone else's computer or update yours to handle the compile, simple as that. No insult intended, just pointing out a fact. Patrick -- --- KMail v1.5.94 --- SuSE Linux Pro v9.0 --- Registered Linux User #225206 On any other day, that might seem strange... ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre python
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:03, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote: Hi, I've downloaded gimp2.0.pre, compiled (with --enable-python), but the scripcts included don't work. Is this known, or there is something wrong with my installation ? Thanks for some information. Przemek Hi there, There is an issue with Python when changing from gtk 1.x to gtk 2.x - and that happens when you change from GIMP 1.2 to GIMP 2.x. It is IMO, quite shamefull for the PyGTK guys, but is work aroundable. The is a file in the Python packages which says which version of GTK porgrans that use PyGTK and the GIMP Python is such a program) will use. It is called pygtk.pth. Locate this file in your python directories, and change its content from: gtk-1.2 to: gtk-2.0 - When you want to run gimp 1.2.5 python scripts, you have to revert this. . The whole issue exists because the PyGTK guys (ok, not all of them, it was an individual decision) did not want to create a gtk2 module, and kept the name of the gtk2 module as gtk, thus breaking backwards compatibility. Regards, JS -- ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Le mar 13/01/2004 à 09:54, Fabio S. a écrit : Now, I am completely happy with my system: am I forced to upgrade distribution just to be able to use gimp 2.0? This would really upset me. Note that the point is not that I am scared at upgrading the system: my first distro was RH 4.x and since I used at least one of any major release. The point is simply that for some month I will have no spare time for doing this... :-((( Did you try URPM ? in Contrib repository (not updated) I can see gimp 1.3.21, gimp-pyton 1.3.21, gimp2-freetype, gimp2-gap_20030730. I did'nt try myself because I prefer the compilation for Gimp2 but it's what Mandrake gives to their users. @+ Raymond ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre python
Hi, I've downloaded gimp2.0.pre, compiled (with --enable-python), but the scripcts included don't work. Is this known, or there is something wrong with my installation ? Thanks for some information. Przemek -- Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl Linux Registered User 239544UIN:8358522 http://counter.li.org/ ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre python
Hi, Przemyslaw Gawronski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I've downloaded gimp2.0.pre, compiled (with --enable-python), but the scripcts included don't work. Is this known, or there is something wrong with my installation ? It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how the scripts don't work. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre python
Dnia Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:27:45AM +0100, Sven Neumann napisa:
It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how the
scripts don't work.
Yes, sorry, about leaving that out.
Here it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gawron]$ gimp-1.3
[1] 4311
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gawron]$ This is a development version of The GIMP.
Debug messages may appear here.
gimp_composite: use=yes, verbose=no +mmx +sse +sse2 -3dnow -altivec -vis
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/gawron/lib/gimp/1.3/python/gimpfu.py, line 427, in _run
extra_params = _interact(func_name)
File /home/gawron/lib/gimp/1.3/python/gimpfu.py, line 239, in _interact
import gimpui
File /home/gawron/lib/gimp/1.3/python/gimpui.py, line 15, in ?
pygtk.require('2.0')
File /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/pygtk.py, line 45, in require
assert not sys.modules.has_key('gtk'), \
AssertionError: pygtk.require() must be called before importing gtk
I've tryied to run from the main menu:
Extras-Python-Fu-Misc-Sphere
All other python scripts endup the same way.
--
Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl
Linux Registered User 239544UIN:8358522
http://counter.li.org/
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre python
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:09:55AM +0100, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
Dnia Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:27:45AM +0100, Sven Neumann napisa?:
It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how the
scripts don't work.
Yes, sorry, about leaving that out.
Here it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gawron]$ gimp-1.3
[1] 4311
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gawron]$ This is a development version of The GIMP.
Debug messages may appear here.
gimp_composite: use=yes, verbose=no +mmx +sse +sse2 -3dnow -altivec -vis
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/gawron/lib/gimp/1.3/python/gimpfu.py, line 427, in _run
extra_params = _interact(func_name)
File /home/gawron/lib/gimp/1.3/python/gimpfu.py, line 239, in _interact
import gimpui
File /home/gawron/lib/gimp/1.3/python/gimpui.py, line 15, in ?
pygtk.require('2.0')
File /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/pygtk.py, line 45, in require
assert not sys.modules.has_key('gtk'), \
AssertionError: pygtk.require() must be called before importing gtk
I've tryied to run from the main menu:
Extras-Python-Fu-Misc-Sphere
All other python scripts endup the same way.
Your version of pygtk is too old, you should use at least 1.99.15, or even
better 2.0.0.
I've updated the configure script to enforce this.
-Yosh
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp2.0pre python
Your version of pygtk is too old, you should use at least 1.99.15, or even better 2.0.0. I've updated the configure script to enforce this. I did as sugested, works like a charme, thankx. Przemek -- Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl Linux Registered User 239544UIN:8358522 http://counter.li.org/ ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Hi, Thomas Spuhler wrote: It compiled here using the configure, make, make install after installing some libraries. Would be nice if I could make rpm's, but I guess the package is not set up that way. There is a gimp.spec file in CVS, and in the tarball, and there are GIMP RPMs pre-built by drc. It looks really nice and has very nice new features. However, I cannot find CMYK mode. I read a review and it was told that this has now been implemented. That would be inaccurate... you can save as CMYK TIFF, but the transforms are really quite simple. There is no native CMYK editting mode. This is a requirement in order to open files that have been produced on Photoshop full Edition by our ad agency. Am I missing something? Afraid not. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Hi, Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It compiled here using the configure, make, make install after installing some libraries. Would be nice if I could make rpm's, but I guess the package is not set up that way. The tarball comes with a working spec file. RPM packages for 2.0pre1 appeared within one day after the source was released. It looks really nice and has very nice new features. However, I cannot find CMYK mode. I read a review and it was told that this has now been implemented. Well, quite a few people talked a lot of stupid things about CMYK support in 2.0. The fact is that there are some small improvements over GIMP-1.2 in this area but not what I would call full CMYK support. Probably the most interesting thing in this area is the soft-proof display filter that allows to get an estimate of how the printed image would look. This is implemented using ICC color profiles. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Hi, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That would be inaccurate... you can save as CMYK TIFF, but the transforms are really quite simple. I am sorry Dave, but this is wrong. The TIFF plug-in included with GIMP-2.0 cannot create CMYK files. It can however read CMYK and have libtiff promote it to RGB. There is a 3rd-party plug-in that does CMYK separations based on ICC profiles by means of lcms. I've ported it to the 2.0 API lately. Not sure if the plug-in author integrated my patch yet. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Well, I think I am going the hard way and compile. The prebuilt rpm's don't install because of incorrect dependencies. Trying to build rpms, is getting me further now but I'll get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gimp2]# rpmbuild -tb gimp-2.0pre1.tar.bz2 error: Failed build dependencies: gimp-print-devel = 4.2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 gtkhtml2-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 MDK does not provide gtkhtml2-devel, but does libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk and libgtkhtml-3.0_2-3.0.8-1mdk libgtkhtml-3.0_2-devel-3.0.8-1mdk also gimp-print-develop is not provided. I have libgimpprint1-develop-4.2.5-30mdk installed equivalent packages from Redhat do collide with the libraries from MDK. Tomn On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 09:19, Dave Neary wrote: Hi, Thomas Spuhler wrote: It compiled here using the configure, make, make install after installing some libraries. Would be nice if I could make rpm's, but I guess the package is not set up that way. There is a gimp.spec file in CVS, and in the tarball, and there are GIMP RPMs pre-built by drc. It looks really nice and has very nice new features. However, I cannot find CMYK mode. I read a review and it was told that this has now been implemented. That would be inaccurate... you can save as CMYK TIFF, but the transforms are really quite simple. There is no native CMYK editting mode. This is a requirement in order to open files that have been produced on Photoshop full Edition by our ad agency. Am I missing something? Afraid not. Cheers, Dave. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 21:32, Thomas Spuhler wrote: equivalent packages from Redhat do collide with the libraries from MDK. This is a given. Mandrake intentionally changed package names when it branched off from Red Hat. If you want to make rpms for Mandrake you're going to have to create a different specfile. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:40, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MDK does not provide gtkhtml2-devel, but does libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk and libgtkhtml-3.0_2-3.0.8-1mdk libgtkhtml-3.0_2-devel-3.0.8-1mdk These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version gtkhtml1. You will need gtkhtml2 for the GIMP help browser plug-in. Wouldn't the libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk suffice? Tom also gimp-print-develop is not provided. I have libgimpprint1-develop-4.2.5-30mdk installed This looks just perfect for gimp's print plug-in. Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Hi, Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:40, Sven Neumann wrote: These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version gtkhtml1. You will need gtkhtml2 for the GIMP help browser plug-in. Wouldn't the libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk suffice? Isn't that what I said? I am sorry I don't know about the package names of Mandrake or RedHat or whatever distribution. I can only tell you what software you need. The translation to package names is up to you. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Hi, Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The most important is to be able to open (read) files from Photoshop that are saved as CMYK (.psd files) GIMP-2.0 can open these. However since the CMYK-RGB conversion is done quite naively I am not sure the result will be useful in a professional environment. This will certainly be improved in the future. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:52, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:40, Sven Neumann wrote: These are two different libraries with incompatible APIs. Actually gtkhtml2 is a rewrite while gtkhtml3 is a newer version gtkhtml1. You will need gtkhtml2 for the GIMP help browser plug-in. Wouldn't the libgtkhtml2_0-2.4.0-1mdk libgtkhtml2_0-devel-2.4.0-1mdk suffice? Isn't that what I said? I am sorry I don't know about the package names of Mandrake or RedHat or whatever distribution. I can only tell you what software you need. The translation to package names is up to you. Swen, I did a normal compilation and install and that worked. But I want to try to build an rpm. Which one is the spec file where I need to change the package names? Sorry for using your time, but I feel I need to do this once. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user Tom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Tom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
?? It compiled and installed flawlesly on my Mandrake 9.2 system. I think freetype 2 came installed by default here. Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them configure, make, make install. Regards, JS -- On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas Spuhler wrote: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre Date: Today 18:00:03 From: Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TUSONIX, Inc.) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message was signed with unknown key. The validity of the signature cannot be verified. Problem: OpenPGP plug-in was not specified. Use the 'Settings-Configure KMail-Security' dialog to specify the plug-in or ask your system administrator to do that for you. Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Tom End of signed message ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Which freetype2 version do you have. I tried to make a rpm with the following command, just in case I need to uninstall it. rpm -ta gimp-2.0pre1.tar.bz2 I get the following: error: Failed build dependencies: gimp-print-devel = 4.2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 librsvg2-devel = 2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 gtkhtml2-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 I then tried to download in install these packages and finally ended up with: Some package requested cannot be installed: librsvg2-2.2.3-2.i386 (due to unsatisfied freetype[= 2.0.1]) do you agree ? and when installing freetype-2.1.2-2.rpm I get really into a dependency problem asking about 100packages to uninstall such as OpenOffice etc. It is not provided by MDK anymore as an rpm, just source rpm? How do I make an rpm from a src.rpm? Tom On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 13:49, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: ?? It compiled and installed flawlesly on my Mandrake 9.2 system. I think freetype 2 came installed by default here. Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them configure, make, make install. Regards, JS -- On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas Spuhler wrote: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre Date: Today 18:00:03 From: Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TUSONIX, Inc.) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message was signed with unknown key. The validity of the signature cannot be verified. Problem: OpenPGP plug-in was not specified. Use the 'Settings-Configure KMail-Security' dialog to specify the plug-in or ask your system administrator to do that for you. Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Tom End of signed message signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
Without thinking all that hard about the details of your problem, why don't you just compile gimp from source? Then you'll find out what you really need to compile/install. Tip: use 'checkinstall' instead of 'make install'. It'll do a 'make install' for you and make custom RPMs of anything your installing. Then you can cleanly remove programs down the road and delete the bloated directory where you compile any given program. Just my 2 bits. Eric Which freetype2 version do you have. I tried to make a rpm with the following command, just in case I need to uninstall it. rpm -ta gimp-2.0pre1.tar.bz2 I get the following: error: Failed build dependencies: gimp-print-devel = 4.2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 librsvg2-devel = 2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 gtkhtml2-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1 I then tried to download in install these packages and finally ended up with: Some package requested cannot be installed: librsvg2-2.2.3-2.i386 (due to unsatisfied freetype[= 2.0.1]) do you agree ? and when installing freetype-2.1.2-2.rpm I get really into a dependency problem asking about 100packages to uninstall such as OpenOffice etc. It is not provided by MDK anymore as an rpm, just source rpm? How do I make an rpm from a src.rpm? Tom On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 13:49, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: ?? It compiled and installed flawlesly on my Mandrake 9.2 system. I think freetype 2 came installed by default here. Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them configure, make, make install. Regards, JS -- On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas Spuhler wrote: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre Date: Today 18:00:03 From: Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TUSONIX, Inc.) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message was signed with unknown key. The validity of the signature cannot be verified. Problem: OpenPGP plug-in was not specified. Use the 'Settings-Configure KMail-Security' dialog to specify the plug-in or ask your system administrator to do that for you. Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Tom End of signed message ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Thomas Spuhler wrote: Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems Yes, I have Gimp2.0pre on Mdk 9.2 Have you installed freetype2-tools-2.1.4-1mdk libfreetype6-devel-2.1.4-6mdk libfreetype6-static-devel-2.1.4-6mdk What are the error messages? Owen ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
