On Sunday 18 July 2004 12:25, Sven Neumann wrote:
I am sorry but SuSE 9.0 isn't recent and there shouldn't be a problem
to install GIMP on a more recent version of SuSE
I installed Gimp 2 on SUSE 9 without problems.
I don't see anybody on the SUSE lists reporting problems with Gimp on
9.1.
On Saturday 12 June 2004 02:17 am, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Greg Rundlett wrote:
With other platforms or distros, you're potentially going to run into
blockers. These are issues that GIMP developers/testers/volunteers
might want to address in a) an install script (if that is even
Hi,
Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we developers use a tool or library to make our work easier,
it's our job to make it easy for the user to install that tool or
library.
We developers? I am sorry but I don't remember you being a GIMP
developer. Perhaps you are using a different
John Dietsch wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:36:18PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
The point is this.it doesn't matter *why* it is difficult, it
matters that it *is* difficult. The result is that people will not use
the GIMP unless they are on Windows, or they
Maybe you want to try another distro. On my Debian box, I typed
apt-get install gimp
and it got installed. No problem there.
Somewhere I read recently that if you switch to Debian, you'll be asking
yourself Why didn't I do this sooner?I can vouch for that.
A lot of times you see somebody
Greg Rundlett wrote:
With other platforms or distros, you're potentially going to run into
blockers. These are issues that GIMP developers/testers/volunteers
might want to address in a) an install script (if that is even possible)
or b) an install guide.
I expect the more 'polished' software
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:36:19PM -0400, Greg Rundlett wrote:
Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously
difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example:
Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst experience thus
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst experience thus far in my Linux life
trying to install GIMP 2.0 on a
Hi,
Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously
difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example:
Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about X, Y,
and Z. To learn more about X, Y, and Z, go here.
Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously
difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example:
Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about X, Y,
and Z. To learn more about X, Y, and Z, go here. You need
Le 07.06.2004 22:49:39, Robert Krueger a écrit :
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib
2.3.6 or the text that pkg-config found, that it would configure
Thong Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version = 2.2.0...
*** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
*** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
*** to
Hi,
Robert Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cannot locate the particular file or text that seems to be
confusing pkgconfig into thinking that 2.3.6 is still on the system.
It was installed in the early stages of trying to solve this problem,
but has since been removed. Glibc on my
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.I
feel
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3 but GLIB ( 2.3.6 )
was found!
i had similar problems with debian. i did not type
Hello,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't built right. Also,
Robert Krueger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I
can on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to
configure.
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Hello,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't
Hello,
Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glib != glibc
slaps palm to forhead.
Sorry about adding noise, wasn't following thread to closely.
Steve
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would configure without
complaint. I don't know how to find and
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would configure without
complaint. I don't know how to find and
Hello,
Forwarring, I haven't used Suse in a very long time, and
I rarely use pkg-config, so I may be leading you down a wrong
road.
Robert Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I need is for someone to work with me to find out how to
eliminate
all traces of 2.3.6 so pkg-config doesn't see
Hi,
Robert Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can
on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
Please go to http://gimp.org/unix/ and use the RPMS linked from there.
Sven
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
snip
Also, what does:
$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
give you?
Steve
I apologize for the deletion. Here's what I get:
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
Even though there are multiple locations for the directory /pkgconfig,
there is only
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 04:12:36PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
are you absolutely married to suse for a distribution?
No offense, Carol, but this thread isn't solving my problem. And I
already did build glib from source...several times.
I'm not changing distributions
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version = 2.2.0...
*** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
*** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
*** to remove the old
29 matches
Mail list logo
