On Sunday 18 July 2004 12:25, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I am sorry but SuSE 9.0 isn't recent and there shouldn't be a problem
> to install GIMP on a more recent version of SuSE
I installed Gimp 2 on SUSE 9 without problems.
I don't see anybody on the SUSE lists reporting problems with Gimp on
9.1.
Hi,
you probably meant to send that mail to the list, didn't you? I am
moving it back on the list. Hope you don't mind
Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry. I didn't mean I was a *gimp* developer, just a free
> software developer: UMENU, VimOutliner, EMDL, and a few other
> pro
Hi,
Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When we developers use a tool or library to make our work easier,
> it's our job to make it easy for the user to install that tool or
> library.
We developers? I am sorry but I don't remember you being a GIMP
developer. Perhaps you are using a differe
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 12:57:55PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2004 02:17 am, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > Greg Rundlett wrote:
> > > With other platforms or distros, you're potentially going to run into
> > > "blockers". These are issues that GIMP developers/testers/volunteer
On Saturday 12 June 2004 02:17 am, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Greg Rundlett wrote:
> > With other platforms or distros, you're potentially going to run into
> > "blockers". These are issues that GIMP developers/testers/volunteers
> > might want to address in a) an install script (if that is even
Maybe you want to try another distro. On my Debian box, I typed
apt-get install gimp
and it got installed. No problem there.
Somewhere I read recently that if you switch to Debian, you'll be asking
yourself "Why didn't I do this sooner?"I can vouch for that.
A lot of times you see somebody sa
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:36:18PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
> >>
> >>The point is this.it doesn't matter *why* it is difficult, it
> >>matters that it *is* difficult. The result is that people will not use
> >>the GIMP unless they are on Windo
> This is like deja-vu. I recently completed a thread with the
> exact same scenario, only using SuSe linux 9.0.My wife downloaded
> Gimp 2.01 on her Dell XP laptop, and it works...bingo! No problems, no
> configurations, no dependencies, no bulls---, it just works. I'm still
> screw
John Dietsch wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst ex
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
>
>
> rob wrote:
>
> >Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
> >
> >It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
> >suse for debian would also be a good idea.
> >
> >
> I too had literally the worst
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:36:19PM -0400, Greg Rundlett wrote:
> >Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously
> >>difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example:
> >>Compiling from source is not recommended unless you
Hi,
Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know. I guess I don't know where to find this info so if
> there is somewhere else on the net (e.g. tldp.org) where I can quickly
> learn the essentials that I'm going to need but are beyond the scope
> of the gimp.org download page, then i
Greg Rundlett wrote:
With other platforms or distros, you're potentially going to run into
"blockers". These are issues that GIMP developers/testers/volunteers
might want to address in a) an install script (if that is even possible)
or b) an install guide.
I expect the more 'polished' softwar
Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously
difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example:
Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about X, Y,
and Z. To learn more about X, Y, and Z, go here. You need
Hi,
Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously
> difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example:
> Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about X, Y,
> and Z. To learn more about X, Y, and Z, go he
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst experience thus far in my Linux life
trying to install GIMP 2.0 on a Fedor
Hi,
Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cannot locate the particular file or text that seems to be
> confusing pkgconfig into thinking that 2.3.6 is still on the system.
> It was installed in the early stages of trying to solve this problem,
> but has since been removed. Glibc on
Thong Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0...
*** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
*** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
*** to remo
Le 07.06.2004 22:49:39, Robert Krueger a écrit :
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib
2.3.6 or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure"
witho
Why is package config in /usr/local/bin ? Are you installing the whole
of gnome from source to try and get this to work? This will cause
problems in the future as you won't be able to automatically upgrade.
Did you install glib from source or rpm? Removing the version glib that
everything is using
I'm not sure if this has already been suggested, but what worked for me is:
locate glib-2.0.pc
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH="result"
i.e.
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$(locate glib-2.0.pc)
-
Timothy Jedlicka, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1-630-713-4436, AOL-IM=bonzowork
Network Entomologist, Lucent Technologies,
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0...
> *** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
> *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
> *** to remove the old v
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 04:12:36PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >are you absolutely married to suse for a distribution?
> >
> No offense, Carol, but this thread isn't solving my problem. And I
> already did build glib from source...several times.
> I'm not changing distri
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Also, what does:
$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
give you?
Steve
I apologize for the deletion. Here's what I get:
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
Even though there are multiple locations for the directory /pkgconfig,
there is only one gl
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-07-04 14:51]:
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.
You will find SuSE 9.0 rpms for gimp 2.01 @:
http://www.usr-local-bin/org
My thanks to all you guys for your help. This is what
Hi,
Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can
> on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
Please go to http://gimp.org/unix/ and use the RPMS linked from there.
Sven
* Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-07-04 14:51]:
> I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
> system.
You will find SuSE 9.0 rpms for gimp 2.01 @:
http://www.usr-local-bin/org
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://w
Hello,
Forwarring, I haven't used Suse in a very long time, and
I rarely use pkg-config, so I may be leading you down a wrong
road.
Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I need is for someone to work with me to find out how to
> eliminate
> all traces of 2.3.6 so pkg-config doesn't
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know how to find and elimin
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know how to find and elimin
Hello,
Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> glib != glibc
slaps palm to forhead.
Sorry about adding noise, wasn't following thread to closely.
Steve
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listi
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Hello,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't
Robert Krueger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I
can on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to
configure.
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6 or
the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know how to find and eliminate this text or files,
t
Hello,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
> ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't built right. Also,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> >>
> >>"pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3 but GLIB ( 2.3.6 )
> >>was found!"
> >>
> >i had similar problems with debian. i di
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> Hi,
> I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
> system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
> this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.I
> feel espe
38 matches
Mail list logo
