On a recent trip I was very restricted with the luggage I carried, so my
photography equipment was limited to an iPhone 5 with two add-on lenses. I
like to shoot spherical panoramas, normally using a canon SLR with
full-frame fisheye lens and Manfrotto spherical pano head.
I had some success
a geometrically
correct cylindrical pano should look like.
On Friday, 8 March 2013 07:43:56 UTC+10, panostar wrote:
On Mar 7, 11:12 am, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
PTgui is even less suitable because of it's design to use one lens for
all
photos.
PTGui can use different
Also, would you be able to share the pts file with me so I can try to
stitch a higher resolution version myself?
On Friday, 8 March 2013 07:43:56 UTC+10, panostar wrote:
On Mar 7, 11:12 am, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
PTgui is even less suitable because of it's design
I have 3 point and shoot Canon's for which I use CHDK
I used the raw shooting capability to shoot CRW format images. These
require processing with DNG2PS or similar to import the EXIF data from the
matching JPEG and convert them into a usable DNG format.
I've learned by reading this thread that
Yes, you can do this. I have used the technique successfully before.
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa290/rich_the_stitch/Australia/ScenicRimMountainspano.jpg
Load all of your photos into a Hugin project.
Go to the Camera and Lens tab.
Find the photo of the whole thing and click on it to
Do your row wrap around 360 degrees? Eg, the last photo in each row
needs to have control point with the first image in that row.
On Mar 24, 12:53 am, Naked Robot 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that when using the --multirow option in cpfind, many
overlapping images don't have control
Should the gigapixel support project be combined with the processing
of very large images project?
Reading through the descriptions, it would seem that gigiapixel won't
be feasible until the latter project is implemented.
Similarly the PSD to PSB project would not be beneficial until it is
Also be aware that the tiffcp command works on a maximum of 5 input
images.
On Jan 13, 9:25 pm, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
cartol...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I don't know if this is your doubt, but this is done in the command
line of your system and not into hugin. Nona comes with hugin
Perhaps this version of libtiff could be incorporated into enblend and
enfuse when it becomes an official stable release?
On Jan 3, 5:34 pm, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
TIFF doesn't have to be limited to 4GB file size:
http://www.aperio.com/bigtiff/
Karmadillo wrote
I was told that OpenEXR doesn't compile on 64 bit windows. This
affects many other applications, not just Hugin.
I have being trying to find a mailing list or forum to raise this
issue. So far have applied to join the mailing list at http://www.openexr.com/
but have not been accepted.
Maybe if a
On Jan 9, 2:00 pm, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was told that OpenEXR doesn't compile on 64 bit windows. This
affects many other applications, not just Hugin.
I have being trying to find a mailing list or forum to raise this
issue. So far have applied to join the mailing
If the CPfind memory issue fixed in this release?
I see that a fix is released according to bugtracker, but there is no
mention about this in the release notes for 2011.4
On Dec 25 2011, 6:13 am, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Thank you all for another great release just in time for the
holidays.
wrote:
On Sat 31-Dec-2011 at 04:20 -0800, Karmadillo wrote:
I agree that in theory this seems to be the best way to do it, however
once I select exposure corrected
The HDR file format section is greyed out, so I only get the LDR file
format options of JPEG, PNG, and TIFF.
The prevents me
request to Hugin to cater for
EXREXR in the stitcher tab?
Rich
On Jan 3, 9:10 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Mon 02-Jan-2012 at 14:41 -0800, Karmadillo wrote:
TIFF is not as good as EXR in my circumstances due to its file size
restrictions.
Because EXR is the native format within
...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 28-Dec-2011 at 15:42 -0800, Karmadillo wrote:
I have a series of EXR images as inputs into my hugin project.
Choices are Exposure corrected LDR
Exposure Fused from stacks
Exposure Fusedd from Any arrangement
High Dynamic Range
Selecting HDR enables the HDR merger
I don't know much about deconvolution.
My thinking is that the lens distortion parameters are best obtained
from many other images shot with the same focal length with the same
lens. It would be hard to calculate distortion from a motion blurred
image due to the loss of precision of control
Hi,
Which stitch settings do I select to create an EXR output image from
EXR input images?
I have a series of EXR images as inputs into my hugin project.
I have successfully aligned them with control points.
Choices are Exposure corrected LDR
Exposure Fused from stacks
Exposure Fusedd from Any
Great work. I will download this when I have enough capacity
available.
Am so impressed that Hugin has been improved again.
Has anyone built a 64bit OpenSuse or Ubuntu version yet?
When the 64 bit windows build is available, would be a good idea to
note if EXR is supported, otherwise a number of
I believe camera have a portrait/landscape tilt sensor that give a
binary output. This would not provide the information you want.
On Dec 3, 2:38 am, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any cameras out there today that record the camera attitude in
EXIF?
Most cameras have at
The problem is between the keyboard and the chair.
On Nov 22, 7:23 am, Simon Oosthoek soml...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 21/11/11 18:39, mark skama wrote:
On 21 Nov, 14:14, mark skama melonefre...@libero.it wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is
If enblend was ported to VIPS it would be fantastic. VIPS architecture
is based around tiles or windows within very large images. This is
similar to the way enblend works currently - assembling numerous
images into a much larger image.
Plus VIPS is supposedly faster, lighter on memory, and uses
would need to
manually record it for each photo.
On Dec 5, 10:16 am, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe camera have a portrait/landscape tilt sensor that give a
binary output. This would not provide the information you want.
On Dec 3, 2:38 am, Oskar Sander oskar.san
RAW images are generally linear but not always.
I worked through an issue with Adobe earlier this year to update their RAW
converter software to address some of the non-linearities introduced by
certain Canon SLR modes.
Since Hugin doesn't work with RAW files, images you feed it will almost
And the Hugin 2011 logo!
Thanks Bruno, I followed your advice and it is now working great.
On Nov 16, 11:42 pm, Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi wrote:
15.11.2011 23:31, Bruno Postle kirjoitti:
On Mon 14-Nov-2011 at 20:10 -0800, Karmadillo wrote:
On Nov 7, 10:14 pm, Karmadillo
TIFF file format will not support images larger than 4GB
Note that intermediate files are also subject to this limit so you may
find it hard to produce TIFF outputs above 3GB. The largest file size
I obtained was 3.4GB but the image was badly messed up and unusable. I
ended up settling for a 2.8GB
On Nov 7, 10:14 pm, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
I just ran up Ubuntu 11.1 64bit and selected Hugin from the package
manager. It was called Panorama but seems to be the 2011.2 version.
When I try to run it, I get this message.
Configuration file /home/rich/.kde/share
Info:
A 360 x 180 panorama
Shot in HDR with 3 exposure brackets at +/- 2EV
Total of 78 shots
2 areas of the photo have focus bracketing
For each of these there are 6 shots (2 at each exposure level and 3 at
each focus distance).
Sould I focus bracket and then HDR merge, or should I HDR merge then
I just ran up Ubuntu 11.1 64bit and selected Hugin from the package
manager. It was called Panorama but seems to be the 2011.2 version.
When I try to run it, I get this message.
I'm a Linux noob, so this is probably a simple one to resolve.
Configuration file
On Nov 4, 3:07 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
In an earlier post Robert Krawitz was sharing some nice panoramas he
did:http://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landsca...
andhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landsca...
and mentioned
I case anyone is following this, I changed to Hugin 2011 32 bit. It
has EXCELLENT exr file handling.
I can preview EXR panoramas, manually and automatically create control
points, re-project them, stitch them.
It's like christmas has come early.
On Oct 13, 8:27 am, Karmadillo directrix.digi
On Oct 9, 3:18 pm, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
Frequently I need to change the projection of an image, or transform
the image to be in a different region of the existing projection.
However I haven't been able to get this to work with EXR (32 bit)
files. According
On Sep 16, 11:31 pm, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 September 2011 16:54, realkiran realki...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having the same problem. I tried the 2011.0 32bit windows version
with no success. HDR output is always blank. If I export to ldr it
seems to work just
Frequently I need to change the projection of an image, or transform
the image to be in a different region of the existing projection.
However I haven't been able to get this to work with EXR (32 bit)
files. According to the documentation however, this should be
possible.
Here is an example 90x90
Re: Hugin GUI for novices
Over the last 4 years I've taken the journey from novice to producing
a number of spherical HDR panoramas successfully.
For the complete novice, hugin isn't too hard to learn, but there are
some confusing options on the stitch panel.
The learning experience taught me a
Love the new features of Hugin 2011.2
I especially found that the copy and paste tool in the masks tab was a
big efficiency improvement.
As usual removing one bottlneck reveals the next one and now I am
thinking that the ability to paste masks to a whole stack at once
would save even more time.
I
The latest ACR is available for download.
If you have been getting magenta casts in the shadows of Canon RAW
files, then this release cures the issue.
Unfortunately I shot over 300 images for panoramas with exposure
highlight compensation turned on, triggering the problem. I have just
spent an
On Aug 23, 10:56 am, Robert Lesac rob...@robertlesac.com wrote:
Using Process Monitor I finally found where enblend is having trouble:
It's trying to access:
W:\_pano-2011\test\e:\temp
and:
W:\_pano-2011\test\e:\temp\
This seems like a bug, can someone else confirm it?
Great to have more
I have produced a few HDRs successfully. However I also have just as
many that didn't work out. So I'm not pretending to be an expert.
On Aug 23, 8:23 pm, Robert Lesac rob...@robertlesac.com wrote:
Errors out with 16bit tiffs: File is not an image file.
What gives? I could not find any
I ran the stitch with verbose setting.
Enblend was outputting: images do not overlap, you can force
blending... for each image that it processed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
On Jul 14, 5:39 am, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On July 12, 2011 11:18:21 pm Karmadillo wrote:
the photos were shot using a calibrated Manfrotto spherical pano
head
so if you take a single bracket, the photos are perfectly overlapping? no
need for alignment?
When I stitch
I agree, have a few panos where only 2 photos are useful out of a 3 shot 2EV
set.
So I have discarded the completely underexposed photos.
Enfuse works well, however I intend to make an HDR image but it won't stitch
when I remove one of the bracketed photos.
The details are in a new thread that I
I am not a User Experience designer, however I manage some, and agree that
this paradigm is optimal.
Remember the structuring and renaming of the stitch options made the whole
tab much easier to understand and use.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Wow, fantastic.
Thanks for the response.
I will try that out within the next 2 weeks.
If I build this into a pto template it will be very helpful to rapidly align
new panoramas.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic
I move the panorama so that the translated shot is centred in the preview
window. E.g. by 0,90,0 (pitch up 90 degrees for a nadir).
I then stitch it (usually rectilinear) with up to 90x90 degrees.
I then create new panorama, stitching the normal equirectangular
output(0,0,0) with the 90x90 patch
Yes I know it takes more effort and is a workaround not a fix, but it is
effective.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
I have the same setup.
You can either change the settings in preferences to 8000 (8Gb)
Or you can add -m8000 options for enfuse and enblend in the stitcher tab.
Make sure you remember which ones you change as it can be time consuming to
go through and review all the settings if one isn't right.
Hi,
I've shot 20 panos so far and Hugin is my tool of choice for
assembling them.
A couple of them that have been shot in HDR and successfully assembled
are giving me challenges when stitching.
68 the photos were shot using a calibrated Manfrotto spherical pano
head with a wide angle (not fisheye
47 matches
Mail list logo
