Binyamin Dissen wrote:
IEA820I TRANSACTION DUMP REQUESTED BUT NOT TAKEN
DUMP INDEX DSNAME NOT VALID
I specify
DSN=DUMPDSN
DUMPDSN DCAL1(L'DUMPDSN_TEXT)
DUMPDSN_TEXT DC C'HLQ.SLQ.DYYMMDD..THHMMSS.'
Which seems to match the example of
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 5/2/2012 7:27 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
IBM should explain what it expects to accomplish during this--on the
face of it--absurdly long interval.
Absurd indeed! When was the last time one of IBM's mainframe customers
enjoyed a 54-hour maintenance/upgrade outage window?
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:09:27 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
Yep.
lcd 'local pdsname'
cd 'foreign pdsname'
MPUT *
will do it just fine.
The tricky part may be allocating the receiving PDS. Notice that
the statement of the problem said it had to be done using FTP.
It's
Bob Shannon wrote:
lcd 'local pdsname'
cd 'foreign pdsname'
MPUT *
This works for text.
It also works, as documented, for load libraries. I regularly use:
mkdir loadlib (like loadlib
lcd loadlib
cd loadlib
mput *
to copy a loadlib to another LPAR.
I typically either use TRSMAIN, TSO
Kirk Wolf wrote:
I'm trying to understand how to use the catalog fields:
COMUDSIZ
UDATASIZ
COMPIND
VVRNFLGS
... in order to get an estimate of the uncompressed size of a compressed,
extended-format DSORG=PS dataset.
The documentation in Managing Catalogs is a little thin.
- is UDATASIZ the
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Nonsense. OS/360 was a swiss cheese.
07F0
0A0C
BCR 15,0? Was serialization required?
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Lester, Bob wrote:
Hi Folks,
With todays' modern disk arrays, is there any reason (z/OS based or other)
that response time for my Mod54s is consistently higher than for my Mod9s?
Assume identical workload against each, single array with multiple LCUs.
RMF says the LCUs are pretty
Andrew Metcalfe wrote:
Folks
Anyone know in which manual can I find the STCCLASS and TSUCLASS initialisation
parameters documented please?
Not in 1.12 JES2 Init Tuning. I suspect that they are synonymous with
JOBCLASS(STC) and JOBCLASS(TSU). I have inherited support for a JES2 system that
Bob Rutledge wrote:
Andrew Metcalfe wrote:
Folks
Anyone know in which manual can I find the STCCLASS and TSUCLASS
initialisation parameters documented please?
Not in 1.12 JES2 Init Tuning. I suspect that they are synonymous
with JOBCLASS(STC) and JOBCLASS(TSU). I have inherited support
chen lucky wrote:
YES, this is one option. But some user have the habit that do a lot of
edition in view mode, then create a new member on behalf of it. So if the
user can reconnect to the remain session after connection failure, this
should be the best choice.
thanks.
2012/3/3
Charles Mills wrote:
Sorry if people feel that times have been beaten to death.
Environment is started task.
In accordance with an earlier thread I am setting _TZ to 'EST5EDT' rather
than the configured null so that strftime(%z) works as expected.
I just discovered that that is throwing my
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 2/26/2012 1:08 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Are these created by Z/OS or by the user or both
I can't think of any z/OS services right now that will implicitly issue
STIMER[M]. That doesn't mean there aren't any.
The only one I ever knew about was BTAM OPEN which issued
R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2011-12-30 22:12, Edward Jaffe pisze:
On 12/27/2011 12:29 PM, McKown, John wrote:
A RACF id can be 8 characters. But, in that case, they cannot have a
TSO segment.
USER=LONGUSER NAME=LONG USERID OWNER=SYS1 CREATED=11.364
[...]
TSO INFORMATION
[...]
Did you try to logon
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:41:21 -0500, Bob Rutledge wrote:
R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2011-12-30 22:12, Edward Jaffe pisze:
On 12/27/2011 12:29 PM, McKown, John wrote:
A RACF id can be 8 characters. But, in that case, they cannot have a
TSO segment.
USER=LONGUSER NAME=LONG
System Programmer wrote:
SDSF security using ISFPRM00 is not working as I expect.
My userid is ending up in the DEFAULT group which is where I would expect it
to be classsified.
SDSF WHO displays GRPINDEX=17,GRPNAME=DEFAULT
GROUP NAME(DEFAULT) AUPDT(0),
TSOAUTH(JCL),
ACTION(NONE),
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Lol! Never noticed before. $HASP165 has inconsistent formatting for the
same return code (zero) from one job to the next. :-D
11.25.31 J0110283 $HASP165 EJES$SAL ENDED AT PHXHQ2 MAXCC=0 CN(INTERNAL)
11.25.34 J0110285 $HASP165 EJES$DAL ENDED AT PHXHQ2 MAXCC=
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 8/17/2011 1:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
(2) has more storage references, while (1) has more opcodes.
Some time ago we rewrote some code that did SPKA/MVC/SPKA to use MVCSK
for integrity reasons. That code was accessing caller's parameters. We
reasoned it was safer
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:34:14 -0400 Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com
wrote:
:Binyamin Dissen wrote:
: R2-R13 must be preserved. R13 points to a standard save area.
: 1.
: LRR0,R2
: IPK ,
: SPKA spec_key
: L R15
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
R2-R13 must be preserved. R13 points to a standard save area.
1.
LRR0,R2
IPK ,
SPKA spec_key
L R15,data
SPKA 0(R2)
LRR2,R0
2.
LAR0,4-1
LAR1,spec_key
-294-1014(res)
j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Bob Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 4:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Pipeline question - whick is better
Nigel Wolfendale wrote:
I have a job with four steps:
Step 1 IEFBR14 - allocate a specific dataset = (MOD,DELETE) - to make sure it
is not there
Step 2 allocate it (NW,CATALOG,DELETE) - this step does not open the dataset
Step 3 Use Connect Direct to write to this dataset from the LAN - the
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:52:41 -0400, Farley, Peter wrote:
LY instruction format from the Principles of Operations looks like:
'E3' R1 X2 B2 DL2 DH2 '58'
You misread the chart. the above is LG, not LY
STY instruction format from the Principles of Operations looks like:
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Bob,
Thank you for your supporting voice and verification. I didn't see your reply
until I had already replied to Tom.
You're welcome.
If the OP's question is restated with the right instructions, it might be of
interest to peruse the instruction lists to see
John Norgauer wrote:
After issuing VERBX SADMPMS, I see the message: THE,DUMP BEING PROCESSED
IS NOT A STAND-ALONE DUMP,
Yet, I know that a S/A dump was taken. It wrote out to my output SADMP
dataset and i see in that dataset the following:
in the first record of SADMP:
Steve Comstock wrote:
On 7/28/2011 12:47 PM, Hal Merritt wrote:
IMNSHO, the risk is real. There are some reports that very
carefully crafted personalized attacks are growing in number
and are enjoying some success.
H. Maybe so. Can you give an example of what personalized
attack would be?
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 7/22/2011 9:20 AM, Starr, Alan wrote:
I believe the following would be a good beginning:
ACCEPT PTFS FUNCTIONS APARS GROUPEXTEND BYPASS(ID)
CHECK .
APARS? BYPASS(ID)? Are these standard parameters used in customer
environments?
No!
Bob
גדי בן אבי wrote:
Hi,
Can z/OS 1.11 run on a z9?
Specifically a 2096-J01.
We're running it on a -V03. It's documented in
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/E0Z2B1A1/CCONTENTS
We currently run a z10BC-I04, and this computer will be our DR system.
Bob
Johnston, Robert E wrote:
We started out years ago with CA's TCP/IP and FTP and it has remained the standard FTP in
Production since then. A new project came up involving lots of new batch FTP jobs to a
Windows machine and I suggested they use IBM FTP. It has gone well for the most part and
Ward, Mike S wrote:
We are mirroring our DISK and tape to a remote location for DR purposes.
About 3 weeks ago we did an exercise and brought the system up at the
remote location. It went great, except for one thing. Since we don't
mirror our page and spool we do a cold start on JES and we don't
גדי בן אבי wrote:
Hi,
One of our operators is using excessive CPU.
Most of his time is spent running the printer, and he is usually looking at the
output queue in SDSF.
There are a few filters specified in SDSF and the information is sorted in a
special way.
He keeps rising to the top of
JT wrote:
Thanks for all the responses here and offline. Here are some answers to
questions about our environment:
- The 2096-T01 is our only processor. We are running z/OS 1.11.
- We do not currently use sub-capacity processing. We do not submit
monthly SCRT reports.
- The T01 runs at
John Thinnes wrote:
In order to save on IMS MLC charges (uses about 3%), we are investigating
adding a second 'IMS LPAR' to our configuration (on same CEC). Currently
we are running a 2096-T01. We run a production LPAR and occasionally a
TECH sandbox LPAR.
In 2012 we may be looking at
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
John Eels said otherwise, and he's in a position to know.
Eells.
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
John Eells wrote:
Is anyone still using OLTEP...and if so...what for?
Note 1: If you haven't been a sysprog for 20 years or more, my guess is
that you probably don't know what it is--and will probably never need
to, so don't worry.
Note 2: Don't panic just yet. We're just askin'.
You
Linda Mooney wrote:
Greetings!
I there any place to find out what the default number for MAXCADS is for each z/OS release?
The health check on my current system tells me that I am above 80% (21 of 25) in use of MAXCADS. I could increase this by coding a value in IEASYS00, but I will
jagadishan perumal wrote:
Hi,
When I view the Started task DSN1WLM I see that the NUMTCB value is set to 8
but i want to change it to 1. I browsed the SYS1.PROCLIB(DSN1WLM), but I
could find the first two lines.
1 //DSN1WLM JOB MSGLEVEL=1
2 //STARTING EXEC
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:10:53 -0700, Bill Johnson wrote:
The real apply when doing a bypass holdsys does not get a zero return code but
a 4.
I thought that lately there was an option to cause RC=0 in this case.
But I can't find it in the manuals.
Actually, these days
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 4/4/2011 2:21 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I totally agree. This situation has been shaping up for a long
Steve:
I totally agree. This situation has been shaping up for a long time.
Apparently,
the work 'plan' is a 4 letter word
Scott J Ford
Scott,
Something strange
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:26:40 -0600, Horne, Patti
patti.ho...@fisglobal.com wrote:
You need to go into Storage Navigator on your USP-V and do the initial
pairing of the aliases to the bases for each LCU. Then when you to the
D M=DEV it will tell you how many aliases you
Could your REXX step read either the SMPOUT report from the SMP/E step with SDSF
or read the SMP/E log?
Bob
Skip Robinson wrote:
We have VPS but not DRS. Let me describe the problem I'd like to solve.
GDPS is not currently orderable in ServerPac, so we install it in its own
CSI. I need a
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 2/4/2011 8:13 AM, Chris Craddock wrote:
All true and good sensible stuff too. For a quick and dirty (and fairly
light weight) way to coerce the system into updating it there's always
this
old trick...
WAIT ECB=PHONY
(do stuff)
Charles Mills wrote:
I've got a cataloged procedure in the SYS1.PROCLIB concatenation. It has the
following PROC statement
//MYPROC PROC PARMS=CZAPARMS,MODE=PROD,INSTALL=,VERBOSE=
And the following PARMS= parameter
PARM=('VERBOSE,CZAPARMS(PARMS),MODE(MODE INSTALL)')
I can override any of the
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Bob Rutledge
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Cataloged procedure misunderstanding
Charles Mills wrote:
I've got a cataloged procedure in the SYS1.PROCLIB concatenation. It has
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Any/every-one else getting spammed by recoveryknowledge ?.
Yes, but I found it mildly amusing...
Hello Deer
Recovery Knowledge an IBM Business Partner is offering an unbelievable
(No License Charge) discount on all our DB2 Automated Tools to IX Netcom.
Bob
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 08:22 -0500 on 01/08/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I
dynamically increase tso size:
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 15:13 -0500 on 01/07/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I
dynamically increase tso size:
Krishnan wrote:
Hi All
I am having
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 15:13 -0500 on 01/07/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: can I
dynamically increase tso size:
Krishnan wrote:
Hi All
I am having a similar problem. I am unable to edit a dataset and
instead am getting the 'browse substituted message'
The ISPF edit
Krishnan wrote:
Hi All
I am having a similar problem. I am unable to edit a dataset and instead am
getting the 'browse substituted message'
The ISPF edit was attempted for a dataset with following characteristics
- RECFM=VB, LRECL=5000.
- DSORG=PS
- BLOCKSIZE=27998
- It's total size is
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Is CEEROPT supposed to be able to affect a regular batch job, or is it just for
CICS and IMS?
CICS/IMS.
I assembled a CEEROPT in to a private load library and then put it in my JOBLIB
concatenation but it doesn't appear to have any effect. Works fine for a CICS
Both ASCBINTS and systrace timestamps are TOD (STCK) values.
Bob
Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
It looks just like the time stamp in a system trace. Number of milliseconds
since 1/1/1970
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ray
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I'm getting ready for a z/OS upgrade from 1.4 to 1.10, and as part of
that we[1] will be going from SAS 8 to SAS 9.2. SAS 9.2 works fine on
z/OS 1/10, but we get an 0C4 trying to use it on our 1.4 system. I did
notice that the 1.4 system is still ARCLVL=1 (ESA/390
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:15:00 -0700, Ulrich Krueger wrote:
How about restricting the use of the E command in that operator's SDSF
profile?
It's also used to change service classes.
E does no such thing.
Bob
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
It's also used to change service classes.
E does no such thing.
Are we talking about E or $E?
We are talking about SDSF action characters.
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
John Norgauer wrote:
Executing SDSF for the first time on a newly installed z/OS 1.11 system, I
get a 806-4 for module ISFVTBL2
Has anyone experienced this problem?
ISFVTBL2 is in ISF.SISFMOD1 which needs to be in your linklist.
Bob
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Hi List,
We're in the middle of a system recovery exercise and our production IDMS
region won't come up. It gets almost up then comes crashing down with a SEE7
abend in the PRODDCV program. Any idea where to look for this?
There are a half dozen notes dealing with
Rick Fochtman wrote:
Could one of you fine ladies or gentlemen kindly download the PF of the
latest Principles of Operations and E-Mail it to me as an attachment?
(I'd also accept BookManager format, but I'm told that it's not available.)
I am having no end of difficulty in getting any sort
Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi,
Where can the 3 (or more) volumes of
*GA22-7820-xx z/OS and z/OS.e DOC APAR and PTF ++HOLD Documentation*
nowadays been found?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/ZDOCAPAR
Bob
Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
*Re. *
*Where can the 3 (or more) volumes of
*GA22-7820-xx z/OS and z/OS.e DOC APAR and PTF ++HOLD Documentation*
nowadays been found?
*
Mike Shorkend wrote:
I work with the OP. We are migrating from z/OS 1.9 and it is indeed a z9, so
HSA is still part of the customer's central storage.
We have found an OPEN APAR OA33307 which describes our problem. Hopefully
there will be a PTF soon as the End-of-Service date is approaching.
I believe that Columbia is the one in Missouri.
Bob
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I know IBM is hiring in Dubuque Iowa. I believe they are also setting up a
center like Dubuque in Columbia, Ohio. I don't remember when that is opening
though. Most of the jobs at both places are not for MVS, but
Gibney, Dave wrote:
So, I'm in doing my final conversion from z/OS 1.9 to z/OS 1.11.
Testing in the sandbox(es) worked fine for a good nine months, and in my
Development LPAR for a good six weeks.
Everything looked good except I get this error sometimes!:
IEF344I GIBNEYX S5D BACKUP -
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
On 21 Jul 2010 14:48:39 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
... If I understand other postings and from what
I recall from 20 years ago when I was an active systems programmer,
FORCE ARM was a last resort...
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:36:56 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
1.6 supported bi-modal, IIRC.
Bi-modal? You mean like MVS/XA? Or do you mean that you
could run it in ESA mode?
There was the z/OS V1R2/3/4 Bimodal Migration Accommodation described in:
Micheal Butz wrote:
This was my first message
DSN1MSTR DSN1MSTR - ABEND=S04E U REASON= 754
After which I changed the region to 0M seemed like it needed to acess more
virtual storage
DSN1MSTR DSN1MSTR - ABEND=S04E U REASON= 800
The Z/OS messages and codes
Stephen Mednick wrote:
I was taken back today with this article that appeared:
An
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid80_gci1515891,00.htm
l?track=NL-576ad=772576asrc=EM_NLN_11912703uid=628605 introduction to
mainframe backup utilities
Could someone please tell me
Mike wrote:
I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1
no SDWA - so no SDWABEA
ip summ reg for;f rtm2wa;f bea
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Am I misreading the manual?
It says
Use the REFDD parameter to specify attributes for a new data set by copying attributes of a data set defined on an earlier DD statement in the same job.
The following attributes are copied to the new data set from (1) the attributes
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
It is useful to be able to receive the second generation before processing the
first. It is less useful that if this happens you have to make a JCL change to be able
to process the older generation once a newer generation has been created.
Are there standard ways of
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Thankfully, APF authorization and system resource access security are 2
separate things. When the OPEN SVC gets invoked, it will perform a
RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH call for the dataset being opened, regardless of the
value in JSCBAUTH. The only way that security checks
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:57:27 -0400, Paul Strauss wrote:
In reply the the section about the short SDSF command below And for some
commands, such as ALLOCATE, many (most?) ISPF command
lines are too short (particularly SDSF's), even when I abbreviate
to the minimum allowed.
Try PGM=IKJEFT01,PARM=compiled program
Bob
Staffan Tylen wrote:
Thanks for the tip but I run both in batch using the same JCL except for the
EXEC statement, which either points to IKJEFT01 or to the compiled program.
Wrong! SYSPROC is of course changed to STEPLIB also. And the ALLOC is for a
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
We have a problem attempting to track which version(s) of
SMPPTFIN files, each containing multiple PTFs, have been
RECEIVEd.
Is there a way to embed a sort of command in SMPPTFIN
that will create an entry in SMPLOG (or elsewhere)
unambiguously recording that that SMPPTFIN
Paul Schuster wrote:
Hello:
Is there a way to -not- have a 'TITLE' page separator appear in the IPCSPRNT
output? For example, I do a SYSTRACE and there is no page separator, but
when I do OPEN PRINT(TITLE('')); SYSTRACE PRINT NOTERMINAL; CLOSE PRINT; I
get a line break.
I am looking for
Andy Wood wrote:
. . .
most 360s didn't actually decrement the low-order bit of the location
timer ... most were at the 3.3mills than 13+ microseconds. 360/67 had
high resolution timer feature that did decrement the low-order bit (this
is somewhat analogous to 370 timer defining the referenced
Your original PROC had two EXEC statements and the SETUP DD was after the
second, which didn't run. Could it be that you deleted one of those EXEC
statements along with the comments?
Bob
מתן כהן wrote:
Hi Chris,
1.i do mean comments.
2. as i already said before . i did all the
Nigel Salway wrote:
Dear Friends,
I have been looking for the end of service dates for the 3490-A20 and 3490-B40 in the announcment archive at http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/
I haven't found any reference to these devices in the announcment letters which suggests to me there has been
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:18:28 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:19:24 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
You may want to update your ISPF configuration table with values
similar to these:
ISPCTL0_BLOCK_SIZE = 27920
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I was trying to find out where and when the GSE IBM system z Technical
Conference is. I've not had any luck. I attended one a year or so back in
Dresden, Germany.
Did the name or something change?
Is this it?
Jeffery Swagger wrote:
I'm having the same problem as the OP and the
solution of SYNCVAL(59) is not working for me.
In SMFPRMxx I have:
INTVAL(10)
SYNCVAL(59) == Was 00
STATUS(SMF,SYNC)
In ERBRMF00 I have
SYNC(SMF)
This only applies to the SMF type 23 records. You need INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC) to
John Norgauer wrote:
...
What is needed in the MPFLSTXX parm to suppress messages going to SYSLOG?
...
I do not recommend this on anything but a standalone sandbox system; it falls
under the category of tampering with evidence and an auditor would frown loudly.
That said, the literal answer
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
This is a new one on me: A started task abends S522 after our JWT
interval. This task is basically a TCPIP Sockets listener (part of
an
IBM product), and
Yes, it has to have a message ID, the definition of which is in the InitTuning
Ref. Essentially, it's the first ten non-blank characters. I've got one that reads
DATA/INDEX,SUP(YES),RETAIN(YES)
Bob
John Norgauer wrote:
Can the MPFLSTXX member be used to suppress any display on the
By default, a started task matching a subsystem name starts under the master
scheduler.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2B680/7.3.1?SHELF=EZ2ZBK0GDT=20080604022956
Bob
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I recently added a subsystem using SETSSI. I did not realize when I
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
command where the prefix is less than eight characters.
Untrue. This APAR adds it to the operand of H or ST commands.
I applied this PTF, assembled/linked the sample ISFUSER into
ISF.SISFLOAD,
Mark Zelden wrote:
If you really want the generic search character added to the PREFIX command,
yes. You need to turn on UPRO1GPF. I have
SY00090
00654130
* SY00090
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:11:43 -0400, Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
If you really want the generic search character added to the PREFIX command,
yes. You need to turn on UPRO1GPF. I have
Have you tried single quotes? I don't have a RedHat server to try but here's an
example talking to a Filezilla server...
ProductID: Unicenter TCPaccess Communications Server Rel 6.0.0
(C) Copyright 1987-2003 Computer Associates International, Inc.
Component: Client FTP, A6007420 UFTP2
Enter
Yes. You have it right.
Bob
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
I want to thank everyone who has chimed in on this.
It sounds like we need to use LNKAUTH=APFTAB instead of the default of
LNKAUTH=LNKLST so that our APPL libraries will not be APF authorized when
accessed via the LNKLST concatentation (or
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
snip
Systems is concerned about system integrity. Rightly so. LNKLST has
historically been for systems libraries only. But since there is no similar
facility for business applications libraries this seems to be the only way I
can get what I want. In any case, does
LNKAUTH=LNKLST only _treats_ unauthorized libraries as authorized when programs
in them are accessed via the link list. Otherwise, they are not authorized (not
known to APF) and so don't show up in the displays.
The integrity issue that concerns your systems folks remains.
Bob
Frank
If that JES is JES2, you'll want to review the material at
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/installation/zos17_jes2_migration.html
Bob
Bruce McKnight wrote:
Greetings all,
(I posted this on Google groups a while ago but would like to reach a larger
audience.)
I've got a 1.4 system
If you do not specify space for DATA and INDEX, the system takes the 25 cyls
and allocates an INDEX as part of the 25 cyls you specified after the DEFINE.
If you want the DATA to contain 25 cyls, then you should specify SPACE for DATA
and INDEX. How much space was allocated to the INDEX?
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
Yeah, sure, with a chainsaw etc...
I was talking about normal users that normally allocate a dataset and
normally try to read it. With SMS-datasets they will encounter an empty
file, with non-SMS they will read what is stil on the tracks from the
previous dataset.
Schlueter, Edward wrote:
but, is there an easy way to find, for example,
100.020.002.020 and
100.20.2.20 (which is really the same IP address)
You could be in for a surprise later in life...
c:\brping 100.020.002.020
Pinging 100.16.2.16 with 32 bytes of data:
0nn means octal nn.
Bob
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:19:58 -0400, Bob Rutledge
deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
...
You could be in for a surprise later in life...
c:\brping 100.020.002.020
Pinging 100.16.2.16 with 32 bytes of data:
0nn means octal nn.
...
On z/OS (and I assume other IBM
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:36:28 -0400, Bob Rutledge
deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
...
On z/OS (and I assume other IBM mainframe operating systems) a
leading zero signifies a leading zero, not a switch to octal.
We include leading zeroes in some IP
They are described in the introduction part of any volume of System Messages
under Messages sent to hardcopy...: First 28 route codes.
Bob
Ron Wells wrote:
Guess I was too quick...
The beginning of the SYSLOG has
NR000 XA91 09152 15:10:44.93 STC06632 0080 IST097I VARY
(Asking in complete ignorance of data masking...) One each of whatever every
3.6 microseconds?
Bob
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009 14:56:27 -0500, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com wrote:
A client of mine is considering IBM Optim (formerly Princeton Softech Optim)
for a large data
Kirk Wolf wrote:
Or this :-)
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=data+masking
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, P S zosw...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, if only there was some sort of way to search a global database for
such things. Hey, wait: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_masking
Ummm, guys, I kind of
I didn't trust my memory either, so I looked. Both LPARs in our basic sysplex
have
TIMEZONE W.04.00.00
SIMETRID 01
Bob
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Seeing that it has been 10 years since I last specified SIMETRID, am I
correct in remembering that it is the only statement necessary in the
Ed,
If you start at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/servicetst/
and sniff around and about, you'll eventually find most of the answers you're
looking for.
Bob
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Richard Peurifoy wrote:
If you want to apply all RSU maintenance, you can specify
RSU* on
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
