Re: Continuing a reply during IPL

On Sat, 4 May 2024 03:55:45 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote: >On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:17:47 +0300, Binyamin Dissen > wrote: > >>Saw the example, tried with and without quotes. No luck. >> >. >. >. >Sorry, I only saw this post yesterday. >I've forced IPL to issue msg.

Re: Continuing a reply during IPL

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:17:47 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote: >Saw the example, tried with and without quotes. No luck. > . . . Sorry, I only saw this post yesterday. I've forced IPL to issue msg. IEA101A by changing IMSI char. from M to T in IPL parameter. First, I've specified SYSP=DW, because

Re: z/OS Enhanced HOLDDATA

>ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/s390/holddata/full.bin > >Gadi > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Giliad Wilf >Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2020 11:51 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z/OS Enhanced HOLDDATA > >Hi All

z/OS Enhanced HOLDDATA

Hi All, Where can I find the z/OS accumulated enhanced holddata? It used to be on the below page... http://service.software.ibm.com/holdata/390holddata.html ...on a table where there was one packaging form in plain test for 730 days that included FIXCATs. This is not a matter of "site down

IBM Personal Communications font

Hi All, Is it possible to configure PCOMM (V6, if it matters) to use a font of choice? Specifically, I'm interested in "Lucida Console" font, which displays better, clearer at any size. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: Chaning time zone for Unix based tasks

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:47:35 +, Allan Staller wrote: >One time setup. > >-Original Message- >From: I M Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Gadi Ben-Avi >Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 1:33 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: Chaning time zone for Unix based tasks >

Re: Xpediter: Same Debugger from Competing Vendors???

__ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Giliad Wilf <00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Xpediter: Same Debugger from Competing Vendors??? On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:29:18 -0500, Da

Re: Xpediter: Same Debugger from Competing Vendors???

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:29:18 -0500, David Staudacher wrote: If memory serves me right, the roots of Xpediter-type software are in a shop that wrote a module that had been inserted into SVC51's (SDUMP) control flow. In those days a large SVC routine was comprised of several pieces, each having

Re: Instruction speeds

> > >Thank you, > >Brian Chapman > > >On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:28 AM Giliad Wilf < >00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:48:18 -0400, Brian Chapman >> wrote: >> >> >Hi everyone, &

Re: Instruction speeds

On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 20:48:18 -0400, Brian Chapman wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I did some searching, but I didn't find anything that really discussed this >on the topic that I'm interested. Is there anything published that compares >the cycle times of the most used instructions? > >For example;

Re: Batch REXX, Consoles & SYSPLEX

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:45:30 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >Veryl Ellis wrote: > >>The REXX Exec determines what processor and LPAR it is in and issues a >>'CONSOLE ACTIVATE', 'CONSOLE SYSCMD... (to start the appropriate TCPIP)' and >>a 'CONSOLE DEACTIVATE'. > >Please post the full

Re: Job abend with S722

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 19:06:04 +0530, raji ece wrote: >One of our job is abending with RC S722 and the error show the maximum >outlimit execeed. We have coded lines=99(Maximum limit) and run but >getting same error. Current zos level is 1.13. any idea? > Did the job ABEND before it has been

Re: WTO for message that will require explicit deletion?

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:39:24 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >I have an APF-authorized batch program that I want to have WTO a message >that will hang out at the bottom of the console screen until it is >explicitly deleted. Can I do that? > > > >The doc for DESC=(3) seems to kind of say that ("If

Re: Tapemap control statement error

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:34:52 -0500, Steve Horein wrote: >Found in one of my toolboxes: > >//STEP1 EXEC PGM=TAPEMAP >//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=1 >//SYSUT1DD VOL=SER=E07101, >// DISP=OLD, >// UNIT=CART, >// LABEL=(*1*,BLP,EXPDT=98000) >//* > No. Omitting

Re: Tapemap control statement error

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:37:11 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: >Jake, > >your DD statemtnt looks wrong: > >Try: > >//SYSUT1 DD >DSN=A,LABEL=(,BLP,EXPDT=98000),UNIT=VTAPE,VOL=SER=P098878,DISP=(OLD,PASS) > >On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:04 PM Jake Anderson >wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I am running this JCL to

Re: Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 23:32:21 -0500, Elaine Beal wrote: >These LPARs do share a master catalog. >LOADxx syscat has the same parm on both LPARs > >A listcat of the master shows the alias entry > >ALIAS -,SYS7.R30 > >Thanks, >Elaine > Can you please show us the complete LOADxx member each

A VTF Mainframe (VTFM) question

Hi All, I've been assigned to evaluate VTF Mainframe (VTFM) at our shop and it is already installed and running. Looking for things that have been set "under the hood" I can see its subsystem has four SSI routines: No. 9, "Notify write-to-operator message". No. 10, "Notify operator command".

Re: NETSTAT command

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:03:10 +, Nai, Dean wrote: >Anyone ever run into a problem where the NETSTAT command hangs? We use it in >some scripts to check if things are up or not but to stopped working last >Friday. When we issue it using TSO NETSTAT or issue it from OMVS it just >hangs. Any

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 07:42:02 -0500, Vinoth Meenakshi wrote: >when i searched for reason code 0594003D its sounds > >BPXFVLKP 10/27/17 > >JRDirNotFound: A directory in the pathname was not found > >

Re: curiosity question about tape drive displays.

"RETAIN" here actually means "leave the volume mounted on the device, and unwound"...pending possible further usage in one of the next jobsteps... On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 23:25:06 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote: . . >Position 1 can be: >Blank = Verify >M = Mount >D = Demount >K = Keep (put in rack) >R =

Re: z/OS BDAM question

Interesting. I recall two statements, probably from two different sources: One states that BDAM does not support large format datasets. The other states that DA datasets accessed by relative track address are limited to 65536 tracks. ...so, I must assume ADABAS has a way for accessing records

Re: VOLCAT split

Maybe it became too "crowded" and one sees alarming message IEC361I...or it became a performance issue... On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 08:11:38 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote: >Just out of curiosity: why do you want to split VOLCAT? > >Kees. > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM

Re: DEVSUPxx question

In short, your DEVSUPxx should have been coded like this: NON_VSAM_XTIOT=YES, COMPACT=YES, MEDIA1=11, MEDIA2=12 ...rather than like this: NON_VSAM_XTIOT=YES, COMPACT=YES, MEDIA1=11, MEDIA2=21 See a sketch here, at

Re: DEVSUPxx question

Sorry, finger check. it should have been: ...and the last digit 'n' to the right of the ppp at the right side of the "=" rather than ...and the last digit 'n' to the right of the ppp at the left side of the "=" On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:23:46 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrot

Re: DEVSUPxx question

As far as I can recall, a media statement in DEVSUPxx has the format: MEDIA1=ppp1, MEDIA2=ppp2, .. .. MEDIA13=pppD ...where ppp stands for partition No., and the last digit 'n' to the right of the ppp at the left side of the "=", must match the 'n' of MEDIAn to

Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th

BM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Giliad Wilf >Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 4:40 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM >Oct. 28th > >Yes, > >I did set TZ to IST-2TDT five months ago on /

Re: SVC99 DEALLOC Failure

0388 is a class-3 error (invalid parameter list), assigned by DAIR, meaning "A required key not specified for any of the following requests": ddname allocation, information retrieval, concatenation, deconcatenation, remove In - Use, unallocation. On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:02:30 -0400, Steve

Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th

-0500, Giliad Wilf wrote: >Yes, > >I did set TZ to IST-2IDT five months ago on /etc/profile, and at additional >places , such as: > >/etc/init.options >/etc/httpd.envvars >/etc/csh.login >/usr/local/zoneinfo > >...and, of course, also on CEEDOPT, CEECOPT, and

Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th

Discussion List On Behalf Of >Giliad Wilf >Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 10:26 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM >Oct. 28th > >Well, something did not work as I expected. >(My original post: >https:/

Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th

Z=IST-2IDT', and everything on z/OS is absolutely OK, except for USS. USS still thinks we're three hours East. Is IPL required anyway (which I don't believe is necessary), or am I missing something obvious ? Regards, Giliad On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 02:39:41 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote: >Good

Re: z/OS BDAM question

You can't. BDAM does not support DSNTYPE=LARGE. Giliad On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:22:04 +, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: >I'm a z/VM and z/VSE shop, but we do have a z/OS system and someone in IT want >to know if BDAM can be larger than 65535 tracks. Is this limitation per >extent or entire

Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th

Good question. Developers here do not rely on local time, but I want them to always see local time. It has something to do with human perception of "reality". Giliad On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:30:24 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 02:38:39 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote:

We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th

Hi All, At 2AM on Sunday, Oct. 28th, Israel is switching from IDT to IST. I have issued this morning a JES2 Automatic Command on all z/OS instances: $TA STTZ,T=98.00,'$VS,''SET TIMEZONE=E.02.00''' Currently, our CLOCK00 is: TIMEZONE E.03.00.00 SIMETRID 00 ETRMODE NO ETRZONE

Re: z/OS 2.3 and VOLCOUNT

t;volumes were possible with a volume count of 20. > >Kees. > > >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mairframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] >> On Behalf Of Giliad Wilf >> Sent: 10 October, 2018 10:48 >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject

Re: z/OS 2.3 and VOLCOUNT

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:53:45 +, Beesley, Paul wrote: As far as I remember, specifying no volcount at all lets you write up to five volumes. If you need more - specifying volcount 6 will let you write up to 20 volumes, because DFSMS lets you have 5 volumes plus another whole multiple of 15

Re: Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW?

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:37:23 -0400, Tom Conley wrote: I assume you see this while browsing the syslog for events that occurred during system startup for STCs launched prior to JES2 start. This is why JES2 definition for STC jobclass is ignored. These STCs get serviced by Master Scheduler, not by

Re: RECEIVE USERMOD IN BINARY

No. GIMUNZIP requires specially built SYSIN. Something like this: //SYSIN DD *

Re: Spam alert: Model9

Got this e-mail too, inspected it with some concerns, but finally opened it. It could prove useful, as the CEO advised my previous employer on performance issues we had, to our satisfaction. This CEO co-authored many IBM publications, both white and red, and was a visiting developer at IBM of

Re: ÝEXTERNAL¨ Re: Report volumes with IPLText

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:18:42 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: > A Stand Alone Dump IPL volume will have a data set >named SYS1.PAGEDUMP.Vvolser > >Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. >Poughkeepsie NY > >> > Just write a VTOC scan program looking for a dataset named

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Report volumes with IPLText

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:07:21 +, Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) wrote: >Good one  > >No - we are taking responsibility for a sister data center and the individuals >who knew where things were have retired without adequate doc. I'm looking to >find which volumes have ipltext - we know of the

Re: MSG IEFA111I SWA=BELOW,TIOT SIZE=32K,DSENQSHR=DISALLOW,GDGBIAS=JOB

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:04:16 +, Pew, Curtis G wrote: >On Aug 10, 2018, at 8:35 AM, Giliad Wilf ><00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >> I can't believe $T JOBCLASS commands will affect STCs started before JES2 >> was up, or started

Re: MSG IEFA111I SWA=BELOW,TIOT SIZE=32K,DSENQSHR=DISALLOW,GDGBIAS=JOB

(to me) like someone issue the command previously and reality and >JESPARM have gotten out of sync. > I can't believe $T JOBCLASS commands will affect STCs started before JES2 was up, or started by subsystems other than JES2. >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

MSG IEFA111I SWA=BELOW,TIOT SIZE=32K,DSENQSHR=DISALLOW,GDGBIAS=JOB

Hi All, Observing a z/OS 2.3 start-up of a new system, I can see a lot of these messages,all of which state "SWA=BELOW". All our JES2 jobclasses specify "SWA=ABOVE, but these messages are issued forSTCs invoked before JES2 start-up, or for STCs managed by subsystems other thanJES2.  AFAIK, SWA

Re: AW: Re: Where do I find a list of world timezones in z/OS USS notation?

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:21:35 -0500, Norbert Friemel <nf.ibmm...@web.de> wrote: >On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 03:31:15 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote: > >> >>Here, IDT started Friday, March 23rd, 2am and will end Sunday, October 28th, >>2am, so, if I specify... >> >>IS

Re: Where do I find a list of world timezones in z/OS USS notation?

BTW, John, when looking for possible "standard" names for timezones, I ran across the following page... http://www.linuxhowtos.org/manpages/3/newtzset.htm ...that misled me to think there is such a list. On the above page there is a specific example for Israel specifying IST2IDT (no minus

Re: AW: Re: Where do I find a list of world timezones in z/OS USS notation?

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:37:53 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote: >>What is important is the numeric part. > > >... and whether or not there is a text string *after* that numeric part. It is >the trigger to activate the automatic daylight saving time handling. No >string, no DST handling.

Re: Where do I find a list of world timezones in z/OS USS notation?

Thank you John, I thought there must exist a list with 'standard' timezone names, and that "IST" by itself meant UTC+2 to z/OS USS, as I've never fiddled with this parameter before. I consider entering 'IST-2IDT' into CEEPRMxx's ENVAR parameters too. Thanks again

Where do I find a list of world timezones in z/OS USS notation?

Hi All, I'm configuring a new system in Israel and wish to pick the correct timezone for our location, in terms of z/OS USS. Our system has been built abroad using CST6CDT, and shipped to us in the form of some 32 dumped 3390-9 volume images. Now I wonder whether or not will IST2IDT be

Re: Can the CSI info alone produce a final list required for full resolution of researched PTFs?

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:53:09 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> wrote: >On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:28:57 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote: >> >>Normally, the process of resolving all REQ/PREREQ/IFREQ requirements for >>given PTF(s) and collecting all missing items

Can the CSI info alone produce a final list required for full resolution of researched PTFs?

Hi All, Normally, the process of resolving all REQ/PREREQ/IFREQ requirements for given PTF(s) and collecting all missing items that prevent resolution, up to the point where APPLY CHECK suggests that actual APPLY could be successful could require several iterations. Is there a shorter path to

Re: PDSE design flaws and need for COBOL 4.2 was Re: Lack of Support for Doc for COBOL

Yes, but no PDSE may be listed in LPALSTxx, and since LPALSTxx must list SYS1.LPALIB, it can't be a PDSE. On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:13:38 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:02:54 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > >>The LPA is built as part of the IPL

Re: Reload nucleus module dynamically

Maybe the code to be replaced is just a vendor's type 1, 2, or 6 SVC routine in the range 255 to 200. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:

Re: GDG +1 dynamic allocation collision between two concurrent jobs

The behaviour I recall seeing in batch environment is that when a new GDG dataset is being created, GDG base is being ENQ'ed exclusively. For any other job attempting creation of another dataset per the same GDG base - this base must be *IMMEDIATELY* available, or the second request will be

Re: IBM Doc Buddy V2 – Connecting with IBM Z users through mobile

Alas, it requires iOS 9.0 or later, which I don't have (my iPhone 4 runs iOS 7.1.2)... On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:57:36 -0500, Parwez Hamid wrote: >For those who are interested, IBM has released V2. The reviews for the earlier >version mixed. Hopefully V2 is an

Re: Lack of Support for Doc for COBOL

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 13:57:53 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote: >IBM first introduced PDSEs about 27 years ago. IBM first introduced Java on >OS/390 about 21 years ago. > >That's a long, long time ago. > >It's impossible to defend stubborn opposition to these and to other highly

Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

A closing note:  The binder has four entry points: IEWBLINK, IEWBLOAD, IEWBLODI (the one  I had trouble with), and IEWBLDGO.   Of these four, only IEWBLINK binds into a program library. The other  three do perform in-core binding.   Yet, the "z/OS V2R2 MVS Program Management: Advanced Facilities"

Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:59:08 -0700, Tom Ross wrote: > >>Everyone talks about WSOPT vs NOWSOPT compiler option, but I can't find the= >>m documented in COBOL documentation library. >>Are WSOPT and NOWSOPT some nicknames of the accurate terms? >>Where are they

Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote: > >There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development (I >think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute >loaded?) that discusses how the writable

Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote: >There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development (I >think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute >loaded?) that discusses how the writable static

Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:37:54 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >And the resulting IEW2678S makes sense in that context, because there >is nowhere known to IEWBLODI for the deferred classes to be loaded >from. So asking IBM to support deferred classes in IEWBLODI (or >IEWBLOAD, which

Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:41:04 -0500, John McKown wrote: >I'm probably not really understanding what you want to do. So I'll give a >try at an alternate explanation for what I _think_ you want. You have a >"test" version of a program, call it TESTPGM, in your

MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

apologies All. Sorry for the "dense" post. Here is a re-send:   Hi All, I'm trying to do an in-core re-bind of a program object currently  residing in a PDSE, rename it, and present its new name to  Contents Supervisor, by dynamically calling IEWBLODI to do the job.  IEWBLODI fails, issuing

MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes

Hi All, I'm trying to do an in-core re-bind of a program object currently residing in a PDSE, rename it, and present its new name to Contents Supervisor, by dynamically calling IEWBLODI to do the job. IEWBLODI fails, issuing MSGIEW2678S, stating "MODULE CONTAINS DATA CLASSES NOT SUPPORTED BY

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:34:42 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >> Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ? > >Theo, > >It would be best to avoid concatenation with referback due to the >potential problems caused by the system restriction described here in

Re: PDSE dataset rename issue

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:23:12 -0500, Tom Marchant <m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:45:13 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote: > >>On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:15:50 -0400, Jim Mulder <d10j...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE >&

Re: PDSE dataset rename issue

On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:15:50 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: > SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE > > SETPROG LNKLST,ALLOCATE > > Use with caution. > >Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. >Poughkeepsie NY > The user says he already did this, to no avail. But

Re: PDSE dataset rename issue

On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:45:25 +0300, venkat kulkarni wrote: >Hello Group, >We have requirement to add new SYS1.SIEKLNKE dataset into system. But this >dataset was allocated to LLA and XCF. So, we unallocated to linklist and >stop LLA. After this, we tried renaming

Re: AW: What is subsystem function code No. 39 and what does it do?

On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:05:35 +0100, Roland Schiradin wrote: >SYS1.MODGEN(IEFSSAG) is the related macro for this function code. HTH > Thank you. This macro only describes a layout of an extension to the SSOB for the service requested. Yet, the "Using the Subsystem

What is subsystem function code No. 39 and what does it do?

It is being described as "Alloc group subsystem requests", but the "Using the Subsystem Interface" manual, SA38-0679, does not say a word about it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: Here comes an extra second

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:50:36 -0600, Edward Gould wrote: >https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/12/161228213356.htm > >On December 31, 2016, a "leap second" will be added to the world's clocks at >23 hours, 59 minutes and 59 seconds Coordinated Universal Time

Re: How set CVTLSO?

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:03:10 -0500, George Kozakos wrote: . >The "epoch" on z/OS systems is 1900. > . Right. It corresponds to a zeroed TOD. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: How set CVTLSO?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:25:28 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: . > >Sure - I understand what's going on. It's just that, typically, one >can "see" the nature of the units involved in such a statement. Often >enough, when some politician or news reporter makes a statement like >"Ontario

Re: How set CVTLSO?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:03:27 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: . > >I'm a little confused about what kind of units "1.4 milliseconds a day >per century" would be in. > >Tony H. > This means that every 100 years, the day gets about 1.4 thousandths of a second longer, compared to the

Re: How set CVTLSO?

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:37:14 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: . >Similarly, when Daylight Saving Time ends (next week) we "add" ond hour >to our civil time clocks in the sense that that day will be 25 hours long >rather than the ordinary 24, by replicating the hour

Re: How set CVTLSO?

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:59:47 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: . > >It's not clear why the convention is to add CVTLDTO to ETOD but subtract >CVTLSO... > . Why do we have to add CVTLDTO (which could be negative if East of GMT), but subtract CVTLSO? Because CVTLSO represents by

Re: Cobol Install FS issue

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:47:58 +0530, Mainframe Mainframe wrote: >Hello Group, > While installing Cobol 5.2, I am getting below issue. > >BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK FAILED FOR >LINK NAME

Boundaries of the 64-bit LocalSystemArea

Apologies for the blundered format of my earlier post. Here is a re-send.  Page 459 of the publication http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247946.pdf on paragraph "21.1.2 Local system area" says:  === Quote === Note: A keyword has been added to the IARV64 REQUEST=GETSTOR,

The boundaries of the 64-bit LocalSystemArea

Page 459 of the publication http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247946.pdf on paragraph "21.1.2 Local system area" says:=== Quote ===Note: A keyword has been added to the IARV64 REQUEST=GETSTOR, LOCALSYSAREA=NO|YES, to indicate that the memory object is to be allocated from the system

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

Much to my regret I've seen the discussion on topic "RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?" too late, and was unable to read all posts on the issue, so bear with me if it turns out that someone else has already mentioned an excellent publication I'm mentioning now: SG24-2070 -

How much CPU percentage can be expected to be reclaimed?

We are having four partitions defined on one of our boxes (2086), with one z/OS image always running, one CF LPAR with CFCC always running, but the remaining two idle most of the time (that is, the remaining two partitions are active and have their share of resources allocated, but no OS is