Went I “nuked and paved” my Mac a couple of weeks ago I had to remember to
do just that: Trying to scroll right in SDSF left me scratching my head
until I did. :-)
I would add that I bought an external keypad, which helps a little. (Though
actually I’m mostly using it - via the wonderful
This might help:
https://www.slideshare.net/MartinPacker/ziip-capacity-planning?from_m_app=ios
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 27 Jul 2018, at 14:40, Scott Chapman
> wrote:
>
> The type 72s will give you zIIP utilization on a service class and report
> class basis. You can use the
SMF 30 has the ASID, in case that’s useful.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 7 Aug 2018, at 20:59, Cieri, Anthony wrote:
>
>
>For this particular exercise/issue I do not need to consider WLM
Inits.
>
>Initially, I would like to be able to produce a list of jobs that ran
in a
Are these LPARs in the same Sysplex? Two beneficial effects if they are:
1) You could - with IRD Weight Management - have weights shifted between
the LPARs.
2) Sysplex PI for important works comes into play.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 28 Aug 2018, at 21:52, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Martin Packer
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 3:59 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: cross LPAR priority and cycle stealing
>
>
(I guess I’m not alone in this and) I’m scratching my head as to what
you’re talking about.) I know “JSON” and Assembler and Rexx but I have no
idea what the specific code you’re talking about is or where both flavours
came from.
It’d probably help if you told us.
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my
s/JSOPN/JSONP/ ?
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 29 Aug 2018, at 18:05, Tom Ross wrote:
>
> >> Is there a COBOL equivalent to JSON.stringify?
> > Yes! It is the JSON GENERATE statement, available in 2016 in COBOL
V6.1
>
> >Awesome! I'm guessing it uses the same environment as the XML
"Meh" is "meh". :-) If I say "hardly worth looking up" I think you'll get
the joke. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebo
A common pattern (and I often see the inactive LPARs in RMF* SMF) but tell me:
Do you duplex DB2 LOCK1? And how is that working out performancewise?
* I wrote about how to do this in
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/lpars_what_s_in_a_name?lang=en
in 2014.
might
possibly be helpful to you.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPa
I saw one the other day without its covers - in the Singapore factory.
Looked nice inside. :-) As did the z13 and the z14 "EC". :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ib
Right. And VPNs are so flaky you really need a session manager if you come
in through one. I certainly do, anyway.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
Where did you get a version of c3270 from for Mac? And how up to date is
it relative to Development versions?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPa
I always thought IFASMFDP (and now IFASMFDL) could do with an exit point -
so you could reformat (flatten, essentially) or filter records using it.
That might cut down data moves.
Next time I talk to “Mr SMF” I should ask him - but I’m already tying up
enough of his time. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Without wishing to open a can of worms, I can say there are several
program-related items I’d love to see in SMF 30 (or similar).
For example, today we have the Top TCB Program Name and Percent in SMF 30.
I’d love to have “top 3” or “top 5”.
But I digress... :-)
Sent from my iPad
> On 7 Apr
st of mine "Screencast 12 - Get WLM Set Up Right For DB2".
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerwork
There is also DIST and DBM1 in there. The action will be heavily geared
towards DBM1. (DIST has work in it mostly on Independent Enclaves so
relatively little of the work therein is at the address space's DP.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Perform
DB2 DOESN'T alter DPs. So far I see no cause to panic - so long as goals
are being met. (And that they are the right goals.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
f research and client work in this very area.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blog
Likewise SMF 30.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
Podcast Se
ich is one of the reasons why we're listening to this thread right now.
Anyone got feedback or follow up on that item? We'd gladly entertain it -
for the next episode.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
Thanks (and thanks to Patrick Falcone for the same information).
I suspect that both because it’s new and because it doesn’t have a huge
amount of traffic it wouldn’t bubble up in our code. Generally we see
IXCLOnnn, DXRm, and DFHIR000 groups bubble up.
This is probably one of those
Looking at the member and job name fields in SMF 74-2 might well give you a
clue.
It’s not one I’ve seen bubble up when I analyse 74-2 (which I do
practically any engagement).
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 Apr 2018, at 02:56, Patrick Falcone
RMF doesn’t know SMF 30. If you can use zBNA then it might be of some value
here - as zBNA certainly does know SMF 30.
But I WOULD start with RMF to get the bigger picture. Unless you already
have, of course. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 Apr 2018, at 02:32, venkat kulkarni
It is, of course, just a set of flag bits in an existing section. Doesn’t
seem to me to be the most difficult of things to map and summarise.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 25 Apr 2018, at 04:24, Jousma, David
<01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Thanks Carmen.
Yes, it’s 2.1 so almost everyone can do it now.
Thanks, Vignesh, for mentioning my quite old blog post.
There is only one place where I process SMF with REXX: I wrote a prototype
to extract the Deactivated LPARs from 70-1. I guess I was lazy. :-) This
code is actually quite handy - and I should
So you have some overflow into ECSA from ESQA. So what?
Seriously, some overflow is normal and reasonable - but far from
universal. Is there any reason to suggest it's actually a problem? (RMF
Virtual Storage report - from SMF 78-2 - would help you analyse this.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
for and process 90's to get more info on the
IPL. (Actually, events in 90's in general.)
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
h
A minor point on protocol: You might want to sign your post.
"ibmm...@foxmail.com" is pretty anonymous, I think you'll agree.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twit
On TWS one nit: You can't have the hot standby be in another plex as it
communicates with the active controller using XCF.
Probably not a show stopper.
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twi
BTW "84" is Singapore, FWIW.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blog
Tell us what it says, please. :-)
Seriously, if TFM fails to cover the ground adequately let us know.
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 08:24, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>
> Martin Packer wrote:
>
>> It could be because the OP expects to see the 5
It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the
CPU ID. But, since the advent of PR/SM we’ve only ever had the 4-character
version.
In SMF we show the 4-character in CPU Data Section in Type 70 but fuller
versions - because I asked for them long ago :-) - in other places
Presumably you're trying to avoid buying a commercial product to do this.
It appears to me this should be a "buy" rather than a "make".
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pa
I suspect the OP wanted an open-ended commitment to maintaining mappings
of all SMF records in DFSORT. :-) Something that would be a huge
undertaking and would, in any case, require an E15 exit or two.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troublesho
Paul, do you have a sample?
(This would actually enable something for me.)
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 31 Dec 2018, at 16:01, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 08:29:19 +, Sean Gleann wrote:
>>
>> As for "This is the
There’s also wildcarding.
BTW it has occurred to me a few times that a classification rule simulator
would be handy.
Sent from my iPad
> On 22 Jan 2019, at 07:45, Horst Sinram wrote:
>
> Peter,
> classification is under control of the classification rules in your WLM
service definition.
> For
Maybe back as far as MYTE.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPa
Any possibility an IFTHEN “pipe” could do this? Or would that not create
multiple bites of the cherry, complexitywise?
Just a “thought”. :-)
Martin
Sent from my iPad
On 2 Apr 2019, at 18:57, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>> There are 473 input fields that are copied over, some of them
converted,
>
Hi Lennie.
A" standard practice" among developers whose products use EXCP (eg DFSORT)
is to switch to BSAM in the case of Extended Format.
That might tell you which way the wind is blowing.
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+4
Was it a single IFTHEN?
Also, I suppose that IFTHEN, being relatively new, might’ve had a different
implementation. But I don’t know and I doubt this kind of internal is
something Sri Hari would feel free to talk about.
Sent from my iPad
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 00:08, van der Grijn, Bart (B)
OK, I'll try...
... Presumably you'd want this putative 32-bit address space to have
access to all the stuff other address spaces have access to, such as
Shared/Common areas above the bar.
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245
And please don't tell me you'd want Db2, IMS, CICS, MQ, Websphere
Application Server to have been 32-bit.
Many other things want scalability beyond 4GB (minus "common").
Plus, how would you map Shared or Common/System 64-Bit objects into such
an address space?
Martin Packer
They will be (running 64-bit). However, apart from Db2*, much of their
virtual storage components can't tolerate being above the bar. Consider
Db2's 64-bit evolution in V8 then V9 then V10.
* Even Db2 has some below-the-bar usage.
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Perform
. The “journey” bit is why I mentioned
the various versions of Db2.
Likewise, z/OS Development has captured its virtual (and real) storage
hills as needed. Not all at once.
Sent from my iPad
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 20:41, Paul Edwards wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:32:01 +0000, Martin P
gt;
> If you want a unique value of timestamp, then I can show you as to what
> Martin Packer suggested. Here are the updated control cards for
generating
> unique timestamp.
>
> //SYSINDD *
> OPTION COPY
> INREC BUILD=(DATE5)
>
> OUTFIL REPEAT=100,
> IFO
Note: With Multi-Row Fetch rows wouldn’t have unique timestamps if the
timestamps WERE generated at fetch time.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 28 Mar 2019, at 19:15, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:38:24 -0700, Sri h
Thanks. If the customer themselves pops up here that'll be great. I don't
want to play "man in the middle" on this one.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
would. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
Podcast Se
You raise a good point but we don't know what kind of "real" timestamp
they want. We could increment by, say, 1 second or 1 millisecond. Random
increments is not something DFSORT can do.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter,
times of day. This is their automation tool of choice. And I
don't know how people alter weights through automation.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
Unless you use an app like Liquid Copy (on iPad) which makes all that very
easy.
I’m doing a lot of technical book reading that way.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 1 Mar 2019, at 23:11, Andrew Rowley
wrote:
>
>> On 2/03/2019 4:55 am, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> I can see making copies
Agreed. I - for maybe 20 years - have recommended reporting on each
processor pool separately.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
h
Would you expect Cycles-Per-Instruction (CPI) in SMF 113 to be larger for
a subcapacity machine?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
h
And that is precisely why I asked the question: To get people thinking
about how this might show up instrumentation. (And no I didn't think there
was a dummy LPAR.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
e
As you mentioned dead trees, my first large-sale publication (which I
turned into a Redbook in 1992 and updated in 1997) was called DEADTREE
SCRIPT/LIST3820 for quite a few years. :-)
(I’m still typecast as “Batch Performance” in the eyes of some people.) :-)
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
Not quite: SMF 70 has the headline numbers (SMF70LAC etc) but it’s SMF 89
that has the sections for products. I would not recommend the latter unless
John’s investigation takes him deeper than the LPAR level.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 5 Mar 2019, at 21:06, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>
I think John might’ve wanted to know what fields to process...
You want SMF70LAC. Also SMF70LACM - for Mobile.
We’ve been very successfully processing lowish volume SMF data in REXX. You can
do this since z/OS 2.1. I won’t tell you this moment the full gamut of SMF
record types we’ve processed
Or maybe it was ICFs. But, again, not quite 20 years. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerw
wildly between operating
environments.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/b
Probably the overwhelming consideration is thread speed sensitivity. DDF
probably OK with it, DBM1 Client SRBs likewise. Java batch jobs possibly
not OK.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin
All together now: “Yeah, and what of it?” :-)
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 14:16, Mark Regan wrote:
>
>
Kees, I would hope that - as part of adding the capacity - you adjust LPAR
definitions, especially weights. Even if that is a "null" adjustment.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
Hi Brian.
Are you referring to Coupling Facility Thin Interrupts? It sounds like you
might be.
Also, are you running a dedicated ICF engine? Or sharing?
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 29 Jan 2019, at 06:24, Brian Westerman
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone had any experience with using
I would form a view as to how important CF request performance is for Dev.
If it's important I'd be tempted to turn DYNDISP off for Dev and let
Sandbox suffer.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin
is
the major destructive factor. THIN just mitigates it.
(The instrumentation to guide you on this is SMF74INT, R744PBSY and
R744PWAI - which can be examined down to the engine level. Sometimes with
value.)
But, as always, actual mainframe estate shape governs the decisions.
Cheers, Martin
Martin
might call them something else.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
o AM64.
>>>
>>> Thanks. Paul.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 02:41:15 -0500, Mike Schwab
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If you are wanting to run in AM64 and use 32 bit constants, that is
>>>> certa
And then there were double-ended strings of disks. 3350s? Just before my
time, really.
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm
Right; I don't see adequate instrumentation to answer the question.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerw
My thought was that perhaps the STORAGE OBTAIN or GETMAIN on a page
boundary might be more expensive than a non-aligned one. If the OP were
doing that repeatedly it might matter.
But I might be talking twaddle. :-)
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troublesho
TCM? That must be going back a bit. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/b
“2107-900” I’ve always felt to be a little non-descriptive. It doesn’t
really document the HDS model.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 May 2019, at 09:55, Ron Hawkins wrote:
>
> Itschak,
>
>
>
> The information is in the NED, which you can display with DS QD,devn,RCD.
>
>
>
>
Pok had a power blip - right while I was talking to someone there over
Skype :-) - at 9:45AM local time. It seems to have affected quite a few
things - such as this.
And, yes, I sincerely hope someone is taking notes and thinking about
resilience.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion
; follow up question chase. :-)
This is a specific form of the same question I'd ask for ANY zCX
implementation.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: Ma
To play Devil's Advocate for a moment, there must've once been a reason
for Db2 to use non-reusable ASIDs.
I wonder what that was.
I further wonder what a "modern" replacement technology would be.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troub
ay it
all out.
But **my** first step will be to find out the PGM= program name or else
the Unix program name for a zCX instance, whichever is operative.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
Allocation doesn't cause SMF 14/15 to be written. CLOSE (and therefore
OPEN) does.
I guess, from the original post, data is written so presumably some form
of OPEN took place.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245
Note: With RUCSA there are still migration actions - because of the new
way of allowing an address space to use it.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
The analogy is with iOS apps. The ones you'd ideally want to use are those
where the vendor is beta'ing iOS 13 (actually 13.1.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Face
Maybe he's talking about the more limited Primary and Secondary address
spaces.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm
Is there a mnemonic PGMNAME for that?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/b
That would correspond to 2 bytes and 4 bytes. Hence the word "code".
(These lengths check out for BALR and BAL on the green card facsimiles
hanging in a frame on the wall of my home office - that John Ehrman gave
me.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator &am
Thanks!
But I believe you can load WLM XML into the app - and also into z/OSMF.
(Yes, I'll admit I only ever parse the XML (with PHP) - having fixed up
some breakage. But the point of unloading is reloading.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Perform
if a global search and replace is wanted.)
And boy would I love a spelling corrector and consistency creator for WLM
policies. This stuff shows up in RMF and hence in titles of some of my
graphs. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
XML perchance?
If so there’s a lot one could do with that... :-)
... If the plane I was about to get on didn’t see me with my elbows (and
knees) up round my ears I’d rustle up a proof of concept. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 17 Sep 2019, at 08:57, Sean Gleann wrote:
>
>
e so happy.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
Podcast Series (Wi
Is anyone here in a position to encourage / facilitate Homebrew on Mac to
move x3270 on from 3.6ga5 to 3.6ga8?
Any reason not to?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twi
Three I can think of straightway:
1) No Linux sysproging
2) WLM workload management
3) Proximity to the data
I think it’s going to be VERY interesting to see what architectures and
operational regimes people come up with.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 25 Jul 2019, at 11:22, Jake
of us who remember history are doomed to recall it at inopportune
moments. :-)
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/my
It’s probably MEMLIMIT - which governs VIRTUAL Storage. And it will be in
GB.
If that’s what Db2 V12 Installation says, you’d better make sure it has it
- whether through JCL or exit or PARMLIB or whatever.
But Db2 will only take what it needs - with the proviso that you can tune
what it needs.
The only zCX specialty engine eligibility is for zIIP.
Sent from my iPad
> On 5 Nov 2019, at 15:08, Gord Tomlin
wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-05 09:56, R.S. wrote:
>>> I suspect CBP would be for running docker payloads ?
>> Well, as I wrote, dockers (zCX) use zIIP. You are right the name is very
>>
.
Oh...
3) Manage the virtual and real memory appropriately.
So, yes, I think multiple tasks invoking ICEMAN in a single job step can
be done.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm
BTW on the Mac there are at least 3 other options:
Python
In-built Apache/PHP
Filezilla
I use option 2 most of the time, option 3 occasionally.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm
OK; I'll bite: Why not run z/OSMF?
But if you prefer to exercise your XSLT skills... :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
h
I’m not really claiming to troubleshoot this but I wonder - based on your
EXCP count comment - what JVM heap specification people (you) are running
with. I wonder if it’s garbage collecting to death.
(I’d also observe Liberty Profile has a generally good reputation for being
lightweight and
Make sure you adjust your LPAR setup when you add capacity. Weights,
Logicalis, etc. You can probably automate that.
Cheers, Martin (bitten by a few experiences in this area)
Sent from my iPad
> On 27 Nov 2019, at 21:17, Laurence Chiu wrote:
>
> Just asking the list has anybody had
Then, of course, there's RDMA.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPa
Not to disagree but I still would love to see SMF 113 (and other
instrumentation) from around a, what shall we call it?, "episode" :-) .I
think the footprints in the sand will be interesting.
But I think we digress quite a long way from OOCoD.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampio
Interesting. And no I didn’t know about it. Question: At what stage does
the ESQA into ECSA check wave a red (or orange) flag?
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 22:34, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:18:32 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>> If you are running
401 - 500 of 658 matches
Mail list logo