On 19 June 2012 08:12, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Can an ADRDSSU archive be transmitted over the Internet?
Sure, but since it comprises RECFM U records, it is likely to lose
something in the process.
I suppose AMATERSE solves most such problems. Can an ADRDSSU archive be
On 20 June 2012 17:15, Art aa...@usa.net wrote:
Hi would anyone know of a calculator and/or formal via rexx that I could
use/setup to convert decimal to bytes. I would like to multiply x
(decimal) by 80 and add an extra 80 bytes.
Not clear what you're asking, but perhaps the d2c()
On 2 July 2012 11:03, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
My gut reactions to things linguistic are usually much like Bill's,
but I have two problems with his position here.
How does one pronounce QANTAS without suggesting to a naif anglophone
that it contains a 'qu'? Kantas?
Since
A testimonial from a site that provides service to a company many of
us know well:
The biggest impact is how quickly we can bring people online to be
productive. In the past, they would train and shadow another
technician for 2-4 months. Now, they go to training and immediately go
to their desk
On 12 July 2012 08:26, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
I am looking for a Concurrent Server example in Assembler
I look at the Rexx program
xxx.SEZAINST is full of assembler example programs, including client
and server using different interfaces to the IP stack.
Tony H.
On 14 July 2012 20:35, Anthony Fletcher flet...@nz1.ibm.com wrote:
Has anyone found where there is documentation on how to code a SUBSYSTEM
that could be the target of a JCL DD SUBSYS=(xyz,abc) statement? I am
looking for information on how to code the subsystem itself and how to pick
up the
On 15 July 2012 20:28, Karl Severson karl_j_sever...@raytheon.com wrote:
Thanks for all of the humorous and semi-humorous replies. Given that I
don't believe that we are going to be able to supply the current proper
host for the DS6800 console, I guess what I was asking was if a work around
On 20 July 2012 05:06, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com wrote:
3. TSO/E is a part of z/OS, but most people who use z/OS these days probably
aren't using TSO/E.
Well, it depends what you measure... When I use my bank's ATM, I am
using z/OS, and the bank has several million customers,
On 19 July 2012 11:00, Thomas David Rivers riv...@dignus.com wrote:
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
The parms passed to the READ SVC (addressed by R1) are
0X''
4X'0048' 6X'' (zero length, use the blksize from the DCB?)
8X'BFF8' (address of the DCB)
12
On 13 August 2012 11:06, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
In capmheapqah_j8ooge4ytzzhnstdmyra_elty4zsd3hgtp1k...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/13/2012 at 02:16 PM, Henri Kuiper henrikui...@zdevops.com said:
If the latter is the case : feel free to contact me. You can take a
sneak
On 13 August 2012 09:31, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com wrote:
In that time-frame, IBM had developed its own serial-copper for disk
operation (internal name harrier out of hursley) and announced as
9333. It ran 80mbits/sec ... full-duplex (aka concurrent 80mbit/sec in
both direction)
On 17 August 2012 12:40, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Way back when, we used to call a memory leak something else on the mainframe.
I have used memory leak for so long I forgot what that term was. Oh well.
The term core cancer was popular in the VM world.
Tony H.
On 28 August 2012 10:29, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
One cryptographic/compression co-processor per core
Presumably optionally disabled to comply with export restrictions?
Is there really anywhere these days you can send a mainframe to that
you can't send a crypto processor
On 28 August 2012 23:28, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Actually, in HLASM I could do anything, even write my own TMP. If I wanted
to.
If I knew how. Couldn't I?
You perhaps could, but the how is no longer documented, and requires
use of OCO control blocks. IBM used to have a
On 28 August 2012 10:55, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:49:21 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
Presumably optionally disabled to comply with export restrictions?
Is there really anywhere these days you can send a mainframe to that
you can't send a crypto processor
On 5 September 2012 15:51, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Rexx is so magical there is no real reason it could not support
Substr(a,3,1) = 'x' and actually be doing a = Substr(a,1,2) || 'x' ||
Substr(a,4) under the covers. Even, for that matter, Substr(a,3,1) = 'xyz'
or Substr(a,3,3) =
On 5 September 2012 17:17, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
The z architecture is fine for numeric computations. The problem is
that the implementation is competing with processors manufactured in
bulk.
On 10 September 2012 12:03, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Is there a technique, statement or utility that will cause a program or
jobstep to see a different timezone? I recall you could do this in VSE. I
looked at the CBT tape and did not find anything. Is there a programming
technique
On 11 September 2012 00:40, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:04:53 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
If you know that your target program uses only the TIME macro, and
that it's the default (SVC) form, which is commonly true of
traditional application programs, then you
On 18 September 2012 01:40, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
I consider C++ a much safer language than C, wrt to both string handling and
memory management. In fact, I find it difficult to fathom why anybody
would still write C code when C++ is such a superior language. Strong typing
On 18 September 2012 16:52, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't find the argument that the terminal 's' in 'PoOps' represents
the plural terminus of 'Principles' at all persuasive. It seems to me
to be a desperate expedient to justify the indefensible.
I find it entirely
On 23 September 2012 21:28, micheal butz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
I am writting a TSO command processor which I invoke IKJPARS to pass control
to a VALIDCK exit rtn
Surely that's not the main reason you are calling IKJPARS...
The code in the routine runs ok
which routine - the
On 24 September 2012 21:48, micheal butz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
I ran the tso command processor under TESTAUTH
When I get to the BR R14 of validity check rtn I inspect R14
And where is R2 pointing at that time (just do a w 2r?) ? And can
you list the registers at the start of your
On 2 October 2012 10:20, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Roberts, John J wrote:
So while we might have 1TB drives in our desktops, the enterprise RAID
arrays are stuck at 73GB-146GB-300GB per HDA.
Actually, z/OS has supported 1TB drives (EAVs) on DS8Ks since z/OS R10,
which went out of
On 5 October 2012 00:44, Timothy Sipples1 sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Suppose Proctor Gamble introduces a new laundry detergent that requires
25% less to wash the same number of loads of laundry. But it costs a bit
more to make: PG also announces a 3% price increase per gram in Canada and
a 5%
On 12 October 2012 18:20, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does anyone have an assembler program I can use that can be assembled to
create a load module for use with the IDCAMS GRAPHICS(TABLE()) parameter that
will work with an ASCII encoded dataset?
Specifically, I want to
On 15 October 2012 17:29, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
On 10/14/2012 9:29 PM, Mark Nelson wrote:
The next meeting of the NY Metro NaSPA Chapter will be on Tuesday, 30
October, 2012, in room 1219 at the IBM Building at 590 Madison Avenue, New
York City, from 10:00 AM until
On 15 October 2012 14:17, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Is there a TXT2TXT utility that will convert FORTRAN-style carriage motion
codes to the standard USASCII
equivalents such as FF, VT, ...?
That would be the lpr/lpd set. I believe both the client and server
ends have to
On 23 October 2012 07:39, Dave McHenry mellonda...@gmail.com wrote:
A manager of ours read a link that claims OPENLDAP could be used to replace
our current mainframe security. Everyone I've asked about this laughs and
says impossible. Is it impossible?
I'm assuming you mean running OpenLDAP on
On 29 October 2012 12:27, scott svet...@ameritech.net wrote:
On 10/29/2012 10:26 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Ummm. There are copyright laws, ya' know.
Do they not expire after 25 years?
No. For most things the clock doesn't even start ticking until the
author dies. But there - I've already
On 30 October 2012 10:30, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Let's suppose that there were similar Eclipse plug-ins for coding in
Assembler:
- It would not only checks syntax, but would interatively assemble as you type
- macros would be looked up as you type; you would get code completion
On 27 December 2012 01:28, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/12/20/arrests-maple-syrup-quebec.html
Well, another Friday... It seems there's going to be a Hollywood movie
about this caper - a “comedy with dramatic overtones”.
On 30 September 2013 10:43, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure just how 'staggering vacations in financial
institutions' dissolves collusions. It may well prevent them during
the interval when either of, say, two colluders is vacationing; but
there would still be ample
On 1 October 2013 20:06, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
Stanford PASCAL also generates P-Code in the first step,
which in the second step is translated to 370 machine code.
Interesting; I had thought that P-code was only interpreted.
BTW: The P-Code of the 1982 variant of
On 1 October 2013 20:06, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
And: it turned out, that the P-Code is not so machine-independant
as it should be. There will be some difficulties regarding character
sets etc., when I try to port the compiler to an ASCII based platform,
for example
On 4 October 2013 12:57, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On 10/3/2013 at 04:22 PM, Gord Tomlin gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com
wrote:
Python is an interesting, and frustrating, case. There have been ports
to s390, but the custodians of the Python trunk are unwilling to accept
s390 patches
On 4 October 2013 16:15, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Radislaw's enumeration for French
France (èéçàù)
is enough to make his point. It is, however, a proper subset. To
write correct French one also needs at least
Œ œ À Á Æ Ç È É Ê â æ ô « »
At least. And probably ë, ï, ö, ü.
On 4 October 2013 19:29, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Similar concerns apply to diacritics; they can drastically alter
semantics. The Spanish word for year is año. It's
important not to neglect the tilde; you get a very different
word. (Are there similar examples in other
On 4 October 2013 19:29, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Many operating systems nowadays welcome files named in the
UTF-8 character set (notable exceptions are z/OS and z/VM).
OS X will let me name files in the Finder GUI in Greek, Hebrew,
Cyrillic, ... But the GUI complains and
On 6 October 2013 15:10, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com wrote:
I would load BPX1GHN on the first invocation and call BPX1GHN. Subsequent
invocations would bypass the LOAD and issue the CALL directly without issuing
another LOAD for BPX1GHN (see code sniper below).
Whatever your
On 8 October 2013 20:35, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
OTOH, I have not, and probably will not take the time to, run an experiment
to see if the assertion of most of the posters here is
correct: that a specified or implied permission in SMFPRMxx is a necessary
condition for writing
On 14 October 2013 05:28, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:
I wondering what is the flow of the STOP command for STC running a BPXBATCH
.
lets say i'm having a STC running a shell script under USS using BPXBATCH,
if the operator will enter the 'P STCNAME' in the console - what will
On 15 October 2013 13:46, MichealButz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
DATA AT PSW 0438EA42 - D4021001 10014770 B1C29620
GR 0: 00054AD8 1:
2: 3: 0002
4: 00054AD7 5: 00054AD8
6: 008C0E31 7: 0438EA04
8: 8438CBEC 9: 8438CB4E
On 15 October 2013 19:40, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
The program fails somewhere in IKJPARS
As I make a breakpoint @ BR. R14
And there is no problem
The registers outside of R15 which is
Zero is the same on entry and exit
I don't know what I did in the verify exit that
On 15 October 2013 22:54, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
You would have thought they would known how much capacity they would need at
the start of the project or just use a cloud operator. Oh well, blame the
Canadians.
Hmmm... I wonder if CGI is involved in our healthcare systems
On 17 October 2013 09:23, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com wrote:
Stockman in The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in
America pg464/loc9995-1:
IBM was not the born-again growth machine trumpeted by the mob of Wall
Street momo traders. It was actually a stock buyback
On 19 October 2013 01:53, saurabh khandelwal
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
I had checked for this IEA304W this message but, I couldn't find it .
What do you mean by I couldn't find it? You don't know how to
display it, or you just didn't see it already displayed anywhere,
or...?
The
On 21 October 2013 16:57, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
But there is no SYS1.SCUNTBL(CUNLM0EB) and an attempt to load the
conversion table for 1047-850 with technique=L fails:
This is surely from APAR OA37099. I mentioned this, and its fix
OA38383 in response to a post of yours entitled
On 23 October 2013 10:35, J Ellis jerry.el...@libertymutual.com wrote:
I'm looking for this manual: S/390® I/O Interface Channel to Channel Control
Unit OEMI
That's a bit of a muddled title. There are two very different books
that almost match, and I'm not sure which one you are looking for.
On 24 October 2013 23:49, Ze'ev Atlas zatl...@yahoo.com wrote:
About a previous post, the endianess should not be a big issue to deal with
once the two sides of the protocol are well defined. The EBCDIC issue is a
make or break issue. MongoDB works decidedly with UTDF-8 and I need COBOL to
On 28 October 2013 11:56, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I still like the _concept_ of an internal character set instead of
using ISO8859-1, or CP-037, or .
No argument. The problem is that the Java developers used their
understanding of the then nascent UNICODE
On 28 October 2013 19:36, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
The locale-dependent services will treat a string as being in a single
locale, so if you are using an English locale then How much does the
chorizo cost? will sort according to US rules.
If you are using the
On October 28 2013 19:36, Seymour J. Metz (Shmuel )
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net said:
[Listserv decided that my message had already been posted, and
suggests changing a few characters. I have done so, in a way that I
trust does not change the meaning of anything that matters.]
The locale
On 28 October 2013 22:24, adarsh khanna adarshkha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does the cost of adding an IFL different on different machines e.g. 2817
compared to 2098. If yes why? as it is just characterization of a core.
You can just as well say that the difference between a CP and an IFL
is just
On 31 October 2013 01:35, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Shmuel Metz writes:
...z/OS does require EBCDIC.
It does not (if referring to ported applications), and repeating a
falsehood does not make it any more true.
EBCDIC support is required if and only if there is a requirement
On 1 November 2013 02:47, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Tony Harminc opines:
[with respect to the need to use EBCDIC]
Sure, if all your application does is crunch numbers or manipulate
bytes. But if it has any interaction with the operating system such as
calling its services
On 1 November 2013 16:22, Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com wrote:
I have a situation where I need to serialize processing and cannot use CDS
because the two addresses being updated cannot
be next to each other (because I use CDS with these two addresses with other
addresses).
CDSG,
On 2 November 2013 21:47, MichealButz michealb...@optonline.net wrote:
[cleaned up messy, space-wasting quoting]
I am running a program under TESTAUTH which executes the TAR instruction,
after executing the inst under TESTAUTH I do a LISTPSW the CC is always 0
Well the DOC says in the ALET
FWIW, the UNIX services for file I/O are callable in SRB mode. But if
you are in SRB mode you own the world in any case.
Tony H.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 6 November 2013 11:23, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
. === smcopy fds(/etc/logs) tds(/u/rex/log-deleteme)
IKJ56700A ENTER INPUT SOURCE DATASET NAME -
/etc/logs
IKJ56709I INVALID DATA SET NAME, /etc/logs
Actually, that could be a valid data set name
On 6 November 2013 18:02, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does anyone actually run X-Windows on z/OS? Seems to me GUI things such as
the Explorer tools, the Debug Tool (and other Productivity Tools) GUI, etc.,
and even RDz could be well served by being X-Windows client
On 7 November 2013 09:33, Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com wrote:
Now that I understand it (mostly) I am pretty sure it will not work for me.
My problem is that a process comes in and removes the control block chain
while another process is suspended and attempting to update the chain.
On 7 November 2013 12:41, Richard Pinion rpin...@netscape.com wrote:
And to throw another twist to this thread, some people say the LRECL and
RECFM should not be coded in the JCL. That way when a change is made to the
program source, that affects LRECL and/or RECFM, the corresponding JCL
On 6 November 2013 16:30, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com said:
One of the shortcomings of PLO (unlike TBEGIN(C) ) is that PLO in
general serializes only against other uses of PLO.
I'd hardly label that as a shortcoming of PLO.
On 7 November 2013 22:45, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
//UNP EXEC PGM=AMATERSE,PARM=UNPACK
[...]
** AMA572I STARTING TERSE DECODE UNPACK 20:08:51 11/07/2013
** AMA527I INPUT - DDNAME : SYSUT1 DSNAME: ...PATH=.SPECIFIED...
** AMA583E INPUT DEVICE TYPE IS
On 11 November 2013 20:15, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
LR2,QUEUE
LR3,NEXT_ENTRY
CS R2,R3,QUEUENew queue head
While this seems bullet proof, it's not. If there is a long delay between
between the L instructions then next entry could
On 12 November 2013 18:31, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
It's curious looked at as a whole. The very existence of an AMA527I
suggests that PATH= is supported; it's an I message (nothing wrong),
and there must be code to discover that PATH= was specified.
[...]
TRSMAIN was an IBM internal
On 14 November 2013 09:26, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
at 08:40 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
Or patents! I notice IBM have quite a few wrt PLO.
Could they be defensive patents? The only really effective way to
prevent someone else from
On 18 November 2013 12:20, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com wrote:
After I issue BPX1QSN I receive a Return Code of 0079 and a Reason Code of
030A
I'm a little puzzled at your
ICM R0,B'',UMSGVALGet Return Value
JNP RETVAL_ERROR No
after the BPX1QSN call, since the
On 18 November 2013 14:36, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com wrote:
Tom Marchant and others pointed out
I don't have an answer to your questions, but I think you mean
LA 15,16
And I agree, However From
z/OS UNIX System Services Programming: Assembler Callable Services Reference
On 24 November 2013 14:07, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Now 'antique' and 'antiquated' are closely related etymologically; but
'antiquated' is pejorative. To antiquate is to make obsolete, and I
am not sure that z/OS is obsolete.
And one might reasonably also say that antique, while
On 2 December 2013 11:01, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 20131201232728.GA25455@dlc-dt, on 12/01/2013
at 06:27 PM, David L. Craig dlc@gmail.com said:
If I remember correctly, the sole reason for limiting TSO IDs to a
maximum of seven characters was to
On 1 December 2013 20:47, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us wrote:
That said, AFAIK, there's really not much, save but for a RACROUTE
REQUEST=AUTH perhaps, that I could do in terms of validation, I could do.
Then again, even w/a RACROUTE/AUTH, it
still does not guarantee integrity.
All
On 2 December 2013 14:02, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:30:29 -0600, Eric Chevalier wrote:
[...]
Now suppose I have some sort of index file where the key is the
unqualified file name and the data is the path to that file. I can
search the index for my file name
On 4 December 2013 10:46, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Well, common sense would suggest www.google.comhttp://www.google.com. Try
that.
Unfortunately that takes me to https://www.google.ca, which doesn't
seem to have a search tools choice. I can force Google to go to the
.com (i.e. US)
On 4 December 2013 19:33, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
Well, common sense would suggest www.google.comhttp://www.google.com. Try
that.
Unfortunately that takes me to https://www.google.ca, which doesn't
seem to have a search tools choice. I can force Google to go to the
.com (i.e
On 6 December 2013 13:22, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Would Metal C remove the need for an Assembler stub?
In this case, probably. But Metal C is not a general substitute for
assembler language, even though you can have inline assembler
statements. Notably, the compiler has
On 9 December 2013 18:04, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
My phrase billions of CCWs was assuming you already knew how to read a full
track with only one CCW. A fully
populated EAV can have 16 to the 7th power cylinders and each cylinder can
have 15 tracks. One Read Track CCW
(and
On 9 December 2013 19:14, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote:
- The first word of the TCB proper, ie. +0 is TCBRBP, but this offset is
fixed by architecture!
I think a number of these comments on doubtful sounding fields came
about only because of the microcoded assists that arrived in the days
On 13 December 2013 13:04, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com wrote:
$ whoami
Error for uid: 12345
$
You did not mention in your original post that you were getting an
error message from whoami. You made it sound as though it was simply
giving you your uid rather than your userid.
On 14 December 2013 22:16, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com wrote:
From z/OS unix command manual
1) whoami displays a user name associated with the effective user ID.
2) To display your login name, use who am i
3) who displays information about users who are logged into the system
On 17 December 2013 00:54, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
But according to non z/Os geeks 'legacy' is: obsolete, outdated, antique,
etc. or something like that ...
That legacy green screen thing must be replaced by our ultramodern,
ultrafast, userfriendly,
On 17 December 2013 14:38, Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com wrote:
I don't see why someone couldn't install their own table in place
of the pointed to by the CVT. See
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.bpxb100%2Fbpx2cr_Example.htm
Sure - I agree that
On 17 December 2013 13:36, Werner Zieleznik wer...@zmindsltd.com wrote:
Does somebody know how to intercept z/OS USS calls?
I managed to intercept several SVC's for audit reasons. Now I would like to
to do the same for USS calls.
The kernel calls are PCs. IBM has rejected (or required a
On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
This link worked for me just now
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/
Works for me too, but it's not the link on the main z/OS Internet
LIbrary page. IBM surely outdoes all other big companies in the
On 18 December 2013 14:02, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Since JES2 comes included with the operating system for JES3 customers, I
set up a dummy JES2 node called FSNA (aka Free SNA, running as a
secondary subsystem) and routed all SNA/NJE traffic through there.
I'm not quite
On 19 December 2013 01:42, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
The new IBM knowledge center, which will replace Information Center, is
available for beta http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/.
There seem to be two quite different Knowledge Centers here: the one
for z/OS is very
On 19 December 2013 12:48, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
There seem to be two quite different Knowledge Centers here: the one
for z/OS is very different from then one for IBM i. The z/OS one seems
to just point to PDFs, but the IBM i one is more like the Information
Centre
On 28 December 2013 00:16, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Do you mean this Java-based version?
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24000251
Thing is, it's not really Java based. It's a Java wrapper for
(presumably) the same old core binaries for Intel that the Windows
On 29 December 2013 09:31, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Now since IBM has killed off Softcopy Reader and friends, maybe they'd
like to release the core Bookie code as open source, as they did for
APL\360 and OORexx. Heh...
So that we could run it on Hercules? Or, is it (even
On 29 December 2013 18:17, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Java I thought ...
No - as I said earlier, the Java versions of Softcopy Reader et al
are just wrappers. The real work gets done in platform-specific
executable code in DLLs or UNIXy shared objects. I haven't looked, but
I'd be
On 22 December 2013 15:11, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
I seem to remember working with some S/360 Model 55 MPs at an FAA Air Route
Traffic Control Center in 1978. They must have had smaller maximum real
memories and run slower than model 65MPs, but had the same RPQ extra
On 30 December 2013 10:31, David Andrews d...@lists.duda.com wrote:
Though the wikipedia article doesn't mention it, my recollection is that
Magnuson's M80 system was microprogrammable by the user. Anybody
remember/use that?
Much earlier the 370/165 and /168 had a Load MicroProgram
On 30 December 2013 08:25, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
on 12/29/2013 at 06:03 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
I imagine it's written in C, since it runs on Windows and Linux on i86,
Cite? There are BookManager products on windoze, but I'm not aware
On 20 July 2012 22:06, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The Subsystem Interface in MVS/SP Version 3 GC66-3131-00
August 1989
I'm guessing this should be GG66-3131. Trivia, and I may well be
wrong, but I'm including it here so it becomes searchable.
Tony H.
On 30 December 2013 18:47, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
BLSR was originally written at Washington Systems Center as
an assembler language subsystem, which was going to be included
with the book The Subsystem Interface in MVS/SP Version 3
GC66-3131-00 August 1989 as a sample
On 31 December 2013 13:23, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Most (?) of the complaints about (non-)shared areas stem from the
non-propagation of DDNAMEs through fork(). Ain't gonna get better
(NVFL, anyway). Because of ENQ conflicts between parent and child.
Extend the ENQ scope to
On 31 December 2013 14:34, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
on 12/30/2013 at 03:29 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
It seems plausible that at least some of the code would be common
with other platform implementations.
Are you talking about BookManager/READ
On 31 December 2013 16:10, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Tony,
Is the DCF format for Book Manager available ? So someone could rewrite code
to read it and process it ?
Not that I know of. That's really what I'd like IBM to provide, but I
think it's unlikely. Presumably it could be
On 2 January 2014 19:09, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
You might start with this URL:
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/product/rational/rational_focal_
point?productContext=-411964485
Another URL that might be quite helpful is this one:
1 - 100 of 1162 matches
Mail list logo
