On Dec 7, 2005, at 9:10 PM, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Keep in your own thread it makes it hard to follow the relevent
parts of a
thread then the subject is hijacked.
My mistake on reply. Appologies
Regards,
Steve Guluk
SGDesign
(949) 661-9333
ICQ: 7230769
To Unsubscribe: http://www.i
Keep in your own thread it makes it hard to follow the relevent parts of a
thread then the subject is hijacked.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sanford Whiteman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 9:00 PM
> To: Ste
> BTW, does your 5XXSINK program have the capabilities to poll iMail
> for updated users or do we need to run the account import function
> every time someone adds a new account?
You can run ExtractUsers periodically on the IMail mailbox server and
dump the results straight into 5XXSINK's rc
I am running Fprot 3.16a signature files created 12/7/2005. Here is the
virus.cfg information that I have:
SCANFILE C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\FPcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM /ARCHIVE=5
/NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE 3
VIRUSCODE 6
VIRUSCODE 8
REPORT Infection:
Also I h
Thanks Sandy!
BTW, does your 5XXSINK program have the capabilities to poll iMail
for updated users or do we need to run the account import function
every time someone adds a new account?
On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:56 PM, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
name-NUL' means the message was deleted based on a rul
Well it is either Imail or declude. Are you running virus scanning with
declude? If so what AV scanner are you using?
Our versions are Imail 8.22 and Declude 3.0.5.22 Spam and Antivirus/Fprot
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
My boss contacted me today about the same issue, he couldn't email a pdf
from MS Outlook or webmail to me internally without out it being corrupted.
He could open the file on his computer no problem, but when he emails that
file it shows up as a .pdf but adobe states that it is corrupt and cannot b
This is a good Idea of something I have not tried. I will shut off PDF
scanning tomorrow and do some testing. We are running F-prot.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Lanard
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:59
It is only PDF files we are seeing as corrupt and no other unexplainable non
repeatable issues. I say non repeatable not because it doesn not repeatable
happen but because I can not mek it happen it happens when ever it wants to.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
There is not a limit on how many conditions but on size of the rule. What
you have should work, but keep your rule under 1,000 characters.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Schaible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ipswitch IMail Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:0
Then it is most likely time to start looking at the physical layer. If they
are on the same LAN and subnet you need to look at the NIC on the server and
possibly the switch and any other hardware in the scope. To me it sounds
like you have a NIC going. Best to capture some data on the wire to se
Hi,
The actual situation of incoming spam needs more complex rules. Unfortunately
the limits of rules are not specified anywhere.
How many AND's and/or OR's per lines are allowed?
Example:
H~(phrase1)!AND!B~(phrase2)!AND!B~(phrase3)!AND!B~(phrase4)
How heavy is nesting supported?
Example:
> In answer to my own question, it looks like maybe these people sent
> to an address without the domain following the email address
> henceforth the log entery citing "name-NUL"
'name-NUL' means the message was deleted based on a rule.
--Sandy
Sanf
Which AV(s) are you running? and have disabled scanning of .pdf's in
Declude?
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Some outbound and sometimes they never leave the server. I have seen
corruption between the imail and the gateway which are on the same lan
segment.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
F
Some outbound and sometimes they never leave the server. I have seen
corruption between the imail and the gateway which are on the same lan
segment.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Rabe
> Sent: Wednesday, December 0
What about the firewall?
1. If you send from one account to another on Imail doe sit come out ok?
2. Or is it all outbound mail PDF attachments only?
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Wednesday, December 07,
The only common denominator is Imail\Declude at this point. I have had PDFs
from copy machines become corrupt and messages email from outside. The
receiving client is sometimes Lotus Notes, Outlook Express, Outlook 2000,
Some messages have been dropped by our Symantec mail gateway due to a
malforme
WHat client is generating the message with the attachment... anything
that could be a common denominator here?
Eric S
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Thsnks for the suggestion,
Not a loop back issue here. Our mail server and gateway are on the same
network outside the corporate firewall, and behind our
On Dec 7, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Stephen Guluk wrote:
20051207 161317 127.0.0.1 SMTP (506d04b83e60) ldeliver
isemanhomes.com chilli-NUL (1) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0
20051207 161317 127.0.0.1 SMTP (506d04b83e60) Inbound X-
IMail-Rule: S=lowest!OR!S~failed!OR!S~Stock!OR!S~onl
Declude 3.0 is required by 8.2x. It is our suggestion as one thing to
check to make sure you wouldn't have any problems
Eric S
Mark Reimer wrote:
The tech guy at IPSWITCH said I should be using Declude 3.0 if I was going
to upgrade to Imail Server 8.22. He could be wrong. I was already on Dec
IN most cases it does it correctly. There are so many different possible
configurations that IIS can be set up with it is almost impossible to
plan for them all. I had virtually no issues with a new install of IIS
and .NET 1.1 and an upgrade to 2006 from 8.21.. Of course I used all the
defaults
Sent you an updated list offline.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From:
Matrosity
Hosting
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:49
PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] import a list
into 2006
that made sense but a ctrl-f in notepad
fine. Here are the logs:
20051207 161317 127.0.0.1 SMTP (506d04b83e60) processing C:
\IMail\spool\Q506c08ac3d08.GSC
20051207 161317 127.0.0.1 SMTP (506d04b83e60) Inbound X-
IMail-Rule: S=lowest!OR!S~failed!OR!S~Stock!OR!S~online!OR!S~viagra!
OR!S~deal!OR!S~message!OR!S
Thsnks for the suggestion,
Not a loop back issue here. Our mail server and gateway are on the same
network outside the corporate firewall, and behind our internet firewall. I
have only had complaints about PDF files.
Our gateway throws this message
The message is malformed. and drops it.
that made sense but a ctrl-f in notepad and a review of
the list came up with 0.
Tripp Allen wrote:
Look in the lists file itself. Look
for addresses that have a space before the closing angle bracket.
Remove the spaces and the problem should go away.
Tripp
---
Are your users and mail server on the same internal network? I had a MAJOR
problem with all attachments randomly getting corrupted. Changing my pop and
smtp settings to my mail server's internal IP address fixed it (by
eliminating a loopback). Hope that makes sense??
~Laura
-Original Messa
(snip)
>
>So far we are thinking of all at a FreeBSD servers, and using all opensource
>software.
>
So why ask on the IMail forum which is Windows based and not opensource?
Perhaps you might want to check out and ask on the Postfix forum...
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswi
Look in the lists file itself. Look for
addresses that have a space before the closing angle bracket. Remove the
spaces and the problem should go away.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From:
Matrosity
Hosting
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, Dec
My users seem to be receiving more and more PDF attachments. It seems that
more an more of them are being corrupted. Is any one else out there having
this issue.
The corruption only seems to happen when IMail sends the message outbound to
our gatewayed domains.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrato
Hi All,
Sorry for the delay.
The 8.22 is an update and anyone running 8.2x gets at no charge. As a
reference, here are Ipswitch's naming conventions.
8.0 is a major
8.1 is a minor (though in the past, has been referred to as a major)
8.11 is an update
8.1 Hotfix 1 is a hot fix.
Per earlier thr
Thanks Eric. Will check it out.
I guess the next question is….why
doesn’t the installer do this automatically? That’s a bit of an
oversight by Ipswitch I feel.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom
Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2005
12:43
We have a client that has two mailing lists with us but
one doesn't appear to have been imported for some reason. Importing a
list used to be rather simple but I tried the same thing but with the
'users.new' file and it doesn't appear to work.
What's also weird is that Iadmin can list the emai
Nothing makes it a requirement. 1.82 is working fine for me. It
doesn't work as well for some others, because Imail 8.2 and above use a
multithreaded SMTP engine and Declude was originally designed with the
assumption that it would be running with a single-threaded SMTP engine.
In many cases this
The tech guy at IPSWITCH said I should be using Declude 3.0 if I was going
to upgrade to Imail Server 8.22. He could be wrong. I was already on Declude
3.0 so it was no big deal. It would probably be best to double check with
Declude tech support before upgrading the Imail Server.
Mark Reimer
IT P
What changed in 8.22 to require Declude 3.0?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That is what was concerning me. I just finished the upgrade and as far as
I
can see all is well. Make sure if you are running Declude that you are on
version 3.0 before you upgra
I would hope you will continue to update the previous supported version for
at least 6 months after a major version upgrade. Also in a very major
upgrade like IMail 2006 with a completely different web interface, it would
be nice to support the previous 8.x version for at least a year with
se
Hi there
guys:
Currently we are
down here now deploying a new email system, wich will have more than
300.000 Parent Domain Email accounts, with more than 1.000 Hosting
Domains.
The plan is for a
nationwide platform, currently the budget is not pretty
tied.
What do you guys
suggest
That is what was concerning me. I just finished the upgrade and as far as I
can see all is well. Make sure if you are running Declude that you are on
version 3.0 before you upgrade.
Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
800-370-5994 ext. 267
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
This does not address the SMTP vulnerability. If you do not use IMAP then
you are not vulnerable to that exploit. These look new to me. The IMAP issue
was supposedly take care of in 8.21.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jo
I do not know about jerks but have you looked here
http://www.google.com/analytics/urchin_software.html
http://www.google.com/analytics/support_locator.html
It looks like google owns urchin now and it is supported through a partner
network.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EM
Yes, but the smtp vulnerability is VERY concerning and not to have an answer
by now is bordering on ridiculous. The smtpd vulnerability has remote
execution of code...
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf /
Internet Specialist
On Wednesday, December 7, 2005 at 6:41:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> I just got off the phone with tech support after 2+ hours. They don't know
> if it affects prior versions because the vulnerability was reported for 8.2.
> He also let me know that if there is a vulnerability in prior
With the description of this issue per iDefense I would imagine that this
problem is present in most all versions of Imail.
Since the offending commands have to be issued by an IMAP user that has
already authenticated I don't see it as a major issue. One of your own
users would have to attack
Sorry for the late response on this... Been WAY too busy...
We have a client running Urchin 3 on Solaris, migrating to Urchin 5 on
Windows. We've tried to reach Urchin, and my good tech support is all
gone... Really really too bad. Anyway, it appears there is no migration
path -- the OS differe
I just got off the phone with tech support after 2+ hours. They don't know
if it affects prior versions because the vulnerability was reported for 8.2.
He also let me know that if there is a vulnerability in prior versions we
have to upgrade to get the fix. I think I'll upgrade since 8.2 seems stab
We all would like to know this - IPSwitch - how about a comment here.
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Reimer
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:06 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Kevin Maybe you c
Kevin,
I've been on hold for 2 hours now with technical support just to find out if
pervious versions of Imail server before 8.2 were affected by these 2 new
vulnerabilities. Can you please shed some light on this? I need to know if
I'm ok or going to have to upgrade to 8.22. Thanks.
Mark Reimer
I
Hello
Kenneth,
Thanks
for the very good and fair comments. Replies below.
Can not delete all
messages in a folder
==KG> This was removed due to
confusion (users wanting to delete a single item and accidentally deleting
all). We're going to bring it back but change location and
inter
Hi,
If you want to install IMail 2006 silent (or unattended), the follow this:
run "imail.exe" with the parameter -r (Record)
Do the usual click-click-stuff. Apply your settings.
Do not run the activation, do it later on. Please remember, that your IMail
server can be installed only twice.
Afte
Hi,
Did somebody made a kind of a load test for the new WebMail? I would like to
know, how the CPU and memory load will be, let's say if 10, 20 and 50 users are
logged in.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstr
Has anyone heard if the vulnerabilities just issued affect imail server
versions prior to 8.2?
Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
800-370-5994 ext. 267
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of darrell_list
Sent: Wednesday, December 0
I don't think it is just a hotfix - I think it is the entire application, but
can be used to update a current installation.
This is how the 8.21 "patch" was like.
Scott Smith
Network Administrator
248.489.1999 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Westside & Detroit Reprographics
An ARC Company
--
The "patch" I downloaded and ran was actually a full installer for Imail
8.22.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir
Eidskrem
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:22 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail 8
Yeah a 23mb bug fix for a program that is 23mb.
Something must be wrong here.
To fix smtp and imap we are downloading 23mb?
H.
Martin Schaible wrote:
Hi Greg,
8.22 is a bugfix, not a major release. Your Key will work. A key might change,
if your are updating a major release (I guess)...
On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:48 AM, Kevin Gillis wrote:
Why announce a critical patch for an outdated version???
On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:48 AM, Kevin Gillis wrote:
This is an excellent question, one that we had a few discussions
about this
week, internally.
Traditionally, the Messaging product line
We charge $2/email account/month, in 5-account packages, for filtering.
Compared to $1/account/month for straight email. However, we bundle the
service with larger hosting packages for increased value to the customer.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Anton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Good morning everyone.
We are wondering what other organizations are (reasonably) charging for
Antivirus / Antispam gateways per user or domain. Just curious. Thanks for
the assistance!
-Chris
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-arch
Sorry - I just
realized this was already discussed.
Hadn't gotten to the
bottom of my inbox yet. :)
Grant Bainbridge
Systems / Network Analyst
Chappell / MarathonFoto
641.472.6892 x211
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI, in case you're not patched
yet:
Two vulnerabilities have been reported in IMail Server, which can be exploited
by malicious users to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) and to compromise a
vulnerable system.
http://secunia.com/advisories/17863/
Hi Greg,
8.22 is a bugfix, not a major release. Your Key will work. A key might change,
if your are updating a major release (I guess)...
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 um 15:16 schrieben Sie:
> I am at Imail 8.15. I have a full download for Imail 8.2
I know 8.15HF2 corrected vulnerabilities found back in May 2005 - but do
these new vulnerabilities affect 8.15?
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
mxGuard, and Imail. IMail/De
Is there an easy way to determine the version/hotfix level you are at with
Imail 8.x.
In the admin tool it will show you that you are at which major/minor version
i.e. 8.15 - but than it has a string of numbers (date stamp) and I am trying
to correlate that to verify which hotfixes are install
I am at Imail 8.15. I have a full download for Imail 8.21. Will the 8.22 key
work for 8.21?
Greg Shepherd
Catalyst Manufacturing Services, Inc
Engineering Manager
2507 Wayne Street
Endicott, New York 13760
Phone: 607-786-6300 x328
Fax: 607-748-8557
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, so I'm told that the RFC for IMAP allows the server to disconnect. The
question is, does IMail do this, and is it controllable?
Here is the reference I was given:
The IMAP RFC 2060 specifies that the server is allowed to disconnect the
clients after 30 minutes of inactivity. The followin
Permissions issue... Make sure the
IUSR_ has all the proper permissions (IIS, Registry, and File
System). this is all outlined in the release notes
Eric S
- Original Message -
From:
Christopher Jones
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 20
Hi Matti,
This is an excellent question, one that we had a few discussions about this
week, internally.
Traditionally, the Messaging product line has done this but typically, for
our other product lines, Ipswitch does not. We are assessing this policy
to determine a consistent approach across a
I tried removing the china blacklist and it won't let
me delete it through iadmin.
Tripp Allen wrote:
What do the logs say it's doing
while it's sitting at 21%? If you look at the task manager, is the cpu
time for smtpd increasing? Maybe try turning off some of the black
lists t
What do the logs say it's doing while it's sitting
at 21%? If you look at the task manager, is the cpu time for
smtpd increasing? Maybe try turning off some of the black lists
to see if that makes a difference.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From:
Matrosity
Hosting
T
ok, dictionary was reset to 0 and it's still sitting at
21%
Tripp Allen wrote:
Message
In services go to SMTP and clear the
max invalid recipients per session for dictionary attacks; that should
turn it off. (Note, you'll need to restart smtpd after changing).
Tripp
Don't for get these too:
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/ics/updates/ics202.asp
Wow.. Not good at all...
~Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:37 AM
> To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.
> More webmail software is going this way as it makes it possible to
> have the cpu intensive websoftware run from a different system or
> even several different systems. The mailserver system can then be
> optimized for mail/disk-performance.
Not exactly. An IMAP daemon must be optimized
Hi,
Webmail now goes through IMAP?
That sounds like a bad design decision. The kind of design a novice would
choose (clean and architecturally pure but totally flawed from a
performance/scalability perspective).
More webmail software is going this way as it makes it possible to have the
cpu
I didn't notice it till your mail..
Why announce a critical patch for an outdated version???
Just change to Imail 9 and everything will be fine :-P
Matti
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.co
Message
Did I miss the E-mail sent by Ipswitch to the list to let us know of this
critical security patch?
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/releases/imail_professional/im822.asp
-SMTPD32: Fixed vulnerability caused by malicious commands.
- IMAP4D32: Fixed vulnerability caused by malicious
74 matches
Mail list logo
