ECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: BlackDown crashed 64bit Firefox - consistently - in both Fedora
> and Ubuntu
>
> The java plugin in 32 bit, and it cannot run on a 64 bit firefox build.
> Use a 32 bit firefox build (like what you download directly from
> mozilla.org
Hey Friends, Why are'nt many 2-D UI features not enabled in the fedora -4 can you please help. Thanks in Advance ShivakanthJames Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, New to the list, with one question. I have a need for a j2se v1.4 compiled to the ARM. I noticed that th
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a Java 1.4 sdk/jre available for linux on the parisc arch?
No.
> > I'm guessing no, but it doesn't hurt to ask...
>
> If not, is there any porting effort underway? If not, would it be
> possible for someone (possibly myself) to undertake such
Brock Rhone writes:
We are starting to intermittently see the following error -- anyone seen it
before or know what it means? (I've also posted this at
Yeah, the amd64 build is not quite stable for me. I can usually get it to
crash using most applets from games.yahoo.com. I guess things haven't
Title: RE: Blackdown and Generics
Have you tried setting your LANG variable to en_US or en_US.UTF-8? Sounds like it is currently set to C or not set at all.
-Original Message-
From: Radu-Adrian Popescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:19 AM
To
This looks like an encoding problem, not a generics problem. The blackdown JDK
should be functionally identical to Sun's, right ? I mean the classpath,
compiler and VM have to be compliant.
Since the generics are implemented like an application then this looks a lot
like a problem with the appli
Paul Nasrat wrote:
http://jpackage.org/
provides nosrc.rpm for blackdown, sun, ibm, jrockit. plus rpms of many OSS java apps.
Thanks for the pointer Paul.
Unfortunatly the plugin is very finicky for some odd reason and didn't like
the layout (that's just a guess). Everytime I tried it on the we
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:04:02AM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but in searching through your
> archives and web pages I haven't found this question or answer.
> I am familier with Sun's Java License, and we actually do have permission
> from them
*A voice from elsewhere says to Troy*
Perhaps if you read the README that comes with Blackdowns java you will be
enlightened.
*Troy reads the README and is enlightened*
Oh, ok. I see this subject seems to already been covered. Thanks for your time.
Troy
Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I'm sorry if t
Hi Julie!
Take a look at this page on the handhelds.org Wiki:
http://www.handhelds.org/z/wiki/GetJavaWorking2
It more or less did the trick for me. The real showstopper was an issue with the
current Xserver in 0.7.2, so I had to install the old one from 0.7.1. I have been
elaborating so
Days have turned into weeks. Any idea when Blackdown 1.4.2 will be available?
There aren't many differences between Sun's 1.4.1_03 and our 1.4.1_01.
A Blackdown 1.4.2 for x86, AMD64, and probably SPARC will be available
in a few days.
Juergen
--
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
...
There aren't many differences between Sun's 1.4.1_03 and our 1.4.1_01.
A Blackdown 1.4.2 for x86, AMD64, and probably SPARC will be available
in a few days.
Is there any way to get a list of differences between the Blackdown and Sun
JVMs? I personally found Blackdown
ly 01, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blackdown Java 1.4.1-01 - Problem with RedHat 9
Pradeep Kumar Sadanapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I would lik eto know whether blackdown java version 1.4.1-01 is
> supported for
Pradeep Kumar Sadanapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I would lik eto know whether blackdown java version 1.4.1-01 is
> supported for RedHat9 ? I mean, does this version support the
> implementation of NPTL(Native POSIX Thread Library) ? I was using
> this verion of java on redhat 8 and it w
From: "Tanguy Monfort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am going to install the Familiar distribution on my Ipaq (H3800),
> and I would like to know whether the Blackdown should be installed
> on it, letting some free space after.
Blackdown provides JRE 1.3.1 RC1 for Linux/ARM as you may know.
There are
I am using Blackdown on my H3850. There is only one
version (1.3.1) for the ARM, so you have no many choices. As I
remember, the total size is about 18M, after the minimal familiar install, you
should have about 23M left, so it is possible for you to install the full java.
You may also get
David,
JDK1.4 includes the JSSE libraries, whereas 1.3 does not. Hence showing
that it works in 1.4 does not prove it will work in 1.3. Probably,
someone made a separate installation on your IBM 1.2, some time in
the past.
Download the JSSE implementation from "http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/"
> On Thursday 14 November 2002 08:45 am, Andrea Aime wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > I would like to ask some questions about blackdown vs sun:
> > - I see blackdown jdk 1.4.1 is at beta stage: when the stable
> >version will be available?
> > - how it compares to the sun jdk 1.4.1_01? In particul
Hi Andrea
I will just give you my personal usage opinion. I use jedit as my primary tool
to develop c/c++ code.
On a gentoo 1.4RC1 machine (dual proc 1.7 Xeon with 1GB RAM) blackdown is
definitely faster than the sun jdk. Also for jedit, the sun jdk does not
allow the server hotspot vm to be use
On 3Jul, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Mark S. Petrovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've recently been experimenting with Blackdown JMF under Suse 7.3
> > Linux. While I have had good results with the Sun JRE v1.3, I have
> > not had success with the same code in the same environment under
>
Mark S. Petrovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've recently been experimenting with Blackdown JMF under Suse 7.3
> Linux. While I have had good results with the Sun JRE v1.3, I have
> not had success with the same code in the same environment under
> JRE v1.4. The requirements page for Blackdo
Olivier Rossel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
>>Olivier Rossel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>Wow. I tested IBM jdk (1.3). It is MUCH faster than Sun's or
>>>Blackdown's, on Swing stuff (under Linux, at least).
>>>
>>
>>Did you compare IBM's VM with the HotSpot Clie
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>Olivier Rossel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Wow.
>>I tested IBM jdk (1.3). It is MUCH faster than Sun's or Blackdown's,
>>on Swing stuff (under Linux, at least).
>>
>
>Did you compare IBM's VM with the HotSpot Client or the HotSpot Server
>VM?
>
Hotspot client for bot
Olivier Rossel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow.
> I tested IBM jdk (1.3). It is MUCH faster than Sun's or Blackdown's,
> on Swing stuff (under Linux, at least).
Did you compare IBM's VM with the HotSpot Client or the HotSpot Server
VM?
> Did they choose a different technological solution, or
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:50:27PM +0100, Olivier Rossel wrote:
> Wow.
> I tested IBM jdk (1.3). It is MUCH faster than Sun's or Blackdown's, on
> Swing stuff (under Linux, at least).
> Did they choose a different technological solution, or what?
Yes - the JVM is their own.
Nathan
---
Nathan,
> There's no obvious reason the JDK should be a pig under
> UML - it's just another native app.
That's my point of view...
> It is a heavy user
> of threads, unlike most Linux apps, so it might be
> worth seeing if other multi-threaded apps show similar
> behavior.
I tried Apache and i
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:53:40PM +0100, Thomas Bonk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to run Jetty (http://jetty.mortbay.org) under the
> Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 in a User Mode Linux VM.
I think yours my be the first ever posting about this. I'm sure
LHM> In the code release Blackdown, exists support for SERVLET?
Now step by step:
1) SERVLET needs server -> Apache
2) Something to support Java Servlet and JavaServlet Pages on server side -> Tomcat
you may find it here http://jakarta.apache.org
All of them are free and easy to install un
http://jakarta.apache.org
LHM> In the code release Blackdown, exists support for SERVLET?
LHM> Regards,
LHM> Henrique
LHM> --
LHM> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LHM> with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Tom Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My video card is supported by XFree86 4.1 (Number Nine Motion 771)
> but I *AM* running a 2.4 kernel (2.4.9) and I've upgraded to
> glibc-2.2.4. Are you saying that I will have to upgrade my video
> card in order to get 1.4 support in the future?
Not i
d to
upgrade your video card?
:ml
>
> Peace
>
> Tom
> My DVD Collection
>
>
>
>
> Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 08/29/01 07:28 PM
>
>
> To: Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: "Liste: Java & L
ergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/29/01 07:28 PM
To: Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: "Liste: Java & Linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Blackdown Java for Linux System Requirements
Martin Schröder
Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2.4 of the FAQ is a bit old.
>
> What are the requirements for 1.3 and what will be the
> requirements for 1.4?
The minimum requirements for 1.3 are: Kernel 2.2.16, glibc-2.1.3,
XFree 3.3.6 (but I would recommend a 2.4 kernel and glibc-2.2.4).
Most
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Alan Hawrelak wrote:
>
> > Sam Joseph wrote:
> >
> >> I can extract the blackdown version, and unpack it but when I try
> >> to run
> >>
> >> the java command I get this:
> >>
> >> l008064:~/j2sdk1.3.0/bin # ./java -version
> >> Error: can't find l
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Alan Hawrelak wrote:
> Sam Joseph wrote:
>
>> I can extract the blackdown version, and unpack it but when I try
>> to run
>>
>> the java command I get this:
>>
>> l008064:~/j2sdk1.3.0/bin # ./java -version
>> Error: can't find libjava.so.
Looks more like he tried to run a x
Sam Joseph wrote:
> I can extract the blackdown version, and unpack it but when I try to run
>
> the java command I get this:
>
> l008064:~/j2sdk1.3.0/bin # ./java -version
> Error: can't find libjava.so.
>
You might want to double check that the unpacked version of libjava.so
has the executabl
Hi,
It seems u have not updated the ld.so.conf present in the /etc directory.,
with the java lib path.
Also after apeending the path run ldconfig . This will append
the path of java lib.
If this doesnt help i wll give u more tips.
Tell me the enviroment settings of ur m/c. Like THREADS_FLAG etc
Follow up to my own mail - I got help from another list, the solution seems
to be:
>You need JDK that is compiled for s390(search google "s390 jdk"), for
> example:
>
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/languages/java/blackdown.org/JDK-1.2.2/s390/FCS/?M=A
Sam Joseph wrote:
> I've been trying to instal
Excuse and a "blind" person but where is it? I cannot find it anywhere on
javasoft.com :-(
/P
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Disregard my last message. Temporary problem :)
- --
/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Since Sun released their J2SDK 1.4 beta today.
*fights to regain breath*
Wow. I had no idea until I read this message.
Unfortunately, the link at Sun's page yields a Permission Denied error at
this time. Does anyone have a direkt link to the Su
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Scott Langley wrote:
> Hi Blackdown Developers.
>
> Will you be releasing a version of JDK1.3.1 with maybe some of the
> deficiences of Sun's just-released version corrected?
Yes. Although it might take a couple of days more because there are
some stability problems with H
(My German is not as good as it used to be!)
1) Ohne die Quelle kann man nicht sehen, ob das Umsturzt bei Speicherunfreiheit liegt.
Wenn das Java Programm ungewohnt lauft, das es das Speicherraum gar nicht oder
am meisten nicht widerabloest, dann krieg man "out of memory".
Hat das Programm ein
> "Volker" == Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Volker> 4 Fragen, die ich gerne loswerden will:
Please talk English here.
Volker> 1)
Volker> Ich habe Blackdown Java 2 SDK Version 1.2.2 FCS auf einer
Volker> Cobalt Maschine mit RedHat Linux (Kernel 2.2.14C11,
Volker> g
Barnet Wagman wrote:
> PS is there any browser that works under Linux that does a better job
> with
> applets?
>
Mozilla is supposed to use the java that is installed on the system and
in windows it works, but I haven't figured out how to get it to work in
Linux.
--
> > >I see what you mean about the applet. After I flicked through a few pages
> > >Netscape crashed and it seemed to take the whole of X with it! Hmmm...no
> > >response from anything until I killed NN. Is this a prob with the applet
> > >or with NN? I'm running 4.7.
These problems are not uniqu
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> At 23:57 9/21/00 +, Mark Ogden wrote:
> >I see what you mean about the applet. After I flicked through a few pages
> >Netscape crashed and it seemed to take the whole of X with it! Hmmm...no
> >response from anything until I killed NN. Is this a prob with the applet
> >
At 23:57 9/21/00 +, Mark Ogden wrote:
>I see what you mean about the applet. After I flicked through a few pages
>Netscape crashed and it seemed to take the whole of X with it! Hmmm...no
>response from anything until I killed NN. Is this a prob with the applet
>or with NN? I'm running 4.7.
I'
I see what you mean about the applet. After I flicked through a few pages
Netscape crashed and it seemed to take the whole of X with it! Hmmm...no
response from anything until I killed NN. Is this a prob with the applet
or with NN? I'm running 4.7.
I have a quick question while I'm here. Is there
On 2000-02-07 10:03:13 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Q2: Can we freely distribute BlackDown jre (not jdk) to customers to let
> them run our java applications? I think someone may already asked similar
> questions before.
The jre comes with a file LICENSE. It should tell you everything
about
Hi Raj.
I'm guessing that you have glibc-2.1.1 on your box, which is the
version that is shipped with RedHat 6.0, and jdk1.2.2 RC3
needs glibc-2.1.2. JDK1.2pre-v2 needs glibc-2.1.1, which is
why you didn't have any trouble with that.
Hope this helps.
jason
Raj Patel wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 05:55:52PM -0800, noisebrain wrote:
>
> Aren't we forgetting something in this discussion?
>
> Average PC has 64M, you want to write an application that runs
> on this PC, your dev environment (JBuilder or whatever)
> has, in addition to the application, a compiler, the I
Aren't we forgetting something in this discussion?
Average PC has 64M, you want to write an application that runs
on this PC, your dev environment (JBuilder or whatever)
has, in addition to the application, a compiler, the IDE, a debugger...
...your development environment is probably going to
Nathan,
>Whoa, Kornel... we disagree on very little, if anything. You're welcome
>to point out deficiencies in the sample implementation, and I hope I'm
>welcome to point out that it *is* a sample implementation (which is why
>there's a market for companies like TowerJ to create *real*
>implement
kornel c wrote:
>
> Dear Nathan,
>
> >But, such considerations aside, it is useful to understand what problems
> >are inherent versus what are implementation details. Some of Java's
>
> I do understand memory management. I just don't necessarily want to have to
> care about it in Java: Java is
Dear Nathan,
>But, such considerations aside, it is useful to understand what problems
>are inherent versus what are implementation details. Some of Java's
I do understand memory management. I just don't necessarily want to have to
care about it in Java: Java is advertised as an environment whic
kornel c wrote:
>
> Dear Nathan,
>
> >Be careful of getting too hung up on the numbers. Memory management is a
> >bit of an art, and different JDKs take different approaches to fitting
>
> It wasn't me who got hung up on the numbers, it was my OS. Hey, I wouldn't
> have even noticed the memory
Dear Nathan,
>Be careful of getting too hung up on the numbers. Memory management is a
>bit of an art, and different JDKs take different approaches to fitting
It wasn't me who got hung up on the numbers, it was my OS. Hey, I wouldn't
have even noticed the memory requirements for long had it not
quot;Hello World" until I tweaked it down to 4 MB manually.
>
> -kornel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Brian Pomerantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
. On Solaris each intance
took up 20 MB for a "Hello World" until I tweaked it down to 4 MB manually.
-kornel
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Brian Pomerantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 09:01:17PM +, Nicholas Wright wrote:
> Hi
>
> Re: 128MB minimum memory - JBuilder was a big application on Windows... what
> makes you think it would be smaller written in Java?
Actually JBuilder Foundation is more efficient than the previous
versions because we had
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 02:34:27PM -0800, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Java is a memory hog... it's not JBuilder, it's Java. I've found that
> my system was pretty much useless for any Java work at 64M. When Linux
> JDKs catch up with some of the improvements now being enjoyed in other
> environments (l
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 03:34:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> The success of any product depends on the advantages it offers and failure
> always depends on restrictions it imposes. Most of the users will be using 64MB
> RAM systems. For JBuilder on Linux should they add more me
>
> To: José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Adam Ambrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise
> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Romildo_Malaquias?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Ambrose <[EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:47:18PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
>
> I agree with your surprise though. It seems quite outrageous to require so
> much memory for an application. I think the JBuilder team should have spent
> a bit more time trimming the memory requirements before rushing the produ
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:47:18PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
>
> José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> > The recommended minimum memory is 128MB! Is that really need? I have
> > only 64MB. Would it be worth downloading and experimenting? Is anybody
> > else using JBuilder under Linux with less tha
Hi,
The success of any product depends on the advantages it offers and failure
always depends on restrictions it imposes. Most of the users will be using 64MB
RAM systems. For JBuilder on Linux should they add more memory? I do not agree
with you. If it is not on Linux the product would have gon
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 04:10:05PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 09:37:51AM -0800, Adam Ambrose wrote:
> > Yes, you just need to fill out a million forms to get it, but you can
> > get it for free from the Inprise web site:
> > http://www.inprise.com/jbuilder/found
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:26:56PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
> > I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> > installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> > ok except for a
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 04:10:05PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 09:37:51AM -0800, Adam Ambrose wrote:
> > Yes, you just need to fill out a million forms to get it, but you can
> > get it for free from the Inprise web site:
> > http://www.inprise.com/jbuilder/found
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:47:18PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
>
> José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> > The recommended minimum memory is 128MB! Is that really need? I have
> > only 64MB. Would it be worth downloading and experimenting? Is anybody
> > else using JBuilder under Linux with less tha
José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> The recommended minimum memory is 128MB! Is that really need? I have
> only 64MB. Would it be worth downloading and experimenting? Is anybody
> else using JBuilder under Linux with less than the recommended 128MB?
I tried it with 48MB and it was almost unusable.
> On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 09:37:51AM -0800, Adam Ambrose wrote:
> > Yes, you just need to fill out a million forms to get it, but you can
> > get it for free from the Inprise web site:
> > http://www.inprise.com/jbuilder/foundation/
>
> The recommended minimum memory is 128MB! Is that really need
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 09:37:51AM -0800, Adam Ambrose wrote:
> Yes, you just need to fill out a million forms to get it, but you can
> get it for free from the Inprise web site:
> http://www.inprise.com/jbuilder/foundation/
The recommended minimum memory is 128MB! Is that really need? I have
onl
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:26:56PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
> > I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> > installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> > ok except for a
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
> I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> ok except for a few little annoyances. [...]
Is there a downloadable version of JBuilder 3 for
Alan Hazelton wrote:
>
> I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> ok except for a few little annoyances. One of which is the fact that
> the "Exit" item is missing from the File menu and the Window m
Brian Pomerantz wrote:
> It is a solution to the problem, though. The Sun JDK doesn't have
> that problem with JBuilder. I also found it to be more responsive
> running JBuilder than the Blackdown JDK is.
Speaking of advantages to the Sun/Inprise JDK, anybody know about how it
handles older or
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
> I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> ok except for a few little annoyances. One of which is the fact that
> the "Exit" item is miss
Gee, fellas,
Its too bad u didn't feel this way when SUN gave u an exclusive license to
do a COMMERCIAL license. I'd invite u to my life-boat, but there just isn't
enough room.
gat
juergen Kreileder wrote:
> AFAIK Sun has all the right to use our code. But todays press release
> is a slap in th
I personally must say that I am the most happy person since blackdowns RC2
came out recently. It works absolutely stable, without problems (yes, I've
solved the Zapd-Dingbats-hit-me-dead-problem). Very good work, very stable.
Today Sun anounced with Inprise the release of Java2 RC1 for linux. Not
Jacob Nikom wrote:
>
> I am eager to buy it. Could you tell us when it will be available?
>
> Jacob Nikom
The publisher is advertising a 12/21/1999 publication date; there should
be general shelf availability in January. I'll send a note to the list
when it's available.
Nathan
>
> Nathan Mey
I am eager to buy it. Could you tell us when it will be available?
Jacob Nikom
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> Man, it's hard to keep up with this business!
>
> When the industry's first book about Java/Linux hits the streets in a
> few weeks, it'll have several chapters about Blackdown and the Black
>
Another big Ditto from me.
>
> James Seigel wrote:
>
> > I think this group knows who to credit for the work in the trenches when no one
> > else was supporting us developers on the Linux platform. As always I give thanks
> > to blackdown for their supreme efforts to make this real!
> >
I al
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:28:45PM -0800, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> The drama never ceases. This is not a business for the faint of heart
> :-).
Not ideed :) Great post Nathan.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Man, it's hard to keep up with this business!
When the industry's first book about Java/Linux hits the streets in a
few weeks, it'll have several chapters about Blackdown and the Blackdown
port, and not a word about the Inprise port -- final editing was
completed weeks ago.
But thanks to a deal
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> I didn't say so. I don't have problems with somebody using our code.
> This is about respect!
Absolutely.
To Juergen and the rest of the Blackdown crew - *we* know the hard time
and effort you've put into this. Don't think you aren't getting the
respect from t
Ditto.
James Seigel wrote:
> I think this group knows who to credit for the work in the trenches when no one
> else was supporting us developers on the Linux platform. As always I give thanks
> to blackdown for their supreme efforts to make this real!
>
> James.
>
> Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 03:15:32AM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> I didn't say so. I don't have problems with somebody using our code.
> This is about respect! What we have now is stuff like:
>
> 'The Sun/Inprise JDK is xx times faster than that Blackdown crap.'
>
> 'Finally
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> I didn't say so. I don't have problems with somebody using our code.
> This is about respect! What we have now is stuff like:
In case you're interested I've posted up an article to our LinuxGrrls.Org
site about this saying basically that, that LinuxToday are kindly l
I think this group knows who to credit for the work in the trenches when no one
else was supporting us developers on the Linux platform. As always I give thanks
to blackdown for their supreme efforts to make this real!
James.
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Paolo Ciccone writes:
>
> Paolo
> Paolo Ciccone writes:
Paolo> On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 10:52:02PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>> AFAIK Sun has all the right to use our code. But todays press
>> release is a slap in the face for us!
Paolo> Juergen, as I posted in other messages we are actually
Paolo
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 10:52:02PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> AFAIK Sun has all the right to use our code. But todays press release
> is a slap in the face for us!
Juergen, as I posted in other messages we are actually giving you guys
credit for all the hard work you have done in the 1.2,
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> OK... it's never dumped core there before, has it?
>
> I'm getting a bit short of ideas and time, but let's see if I can make
> any headway. It's dying as soon as you start up "java -green" with my
> two recommended environment variable values (JAVA_DEBUG and LD_PRELOAD)?
>
I don't know about your problem, but I *do* know that you have to set
THREADS_FLAG=green
JAVA_COMPILER=NONE
to get jdb to run.
Thus spake Raj Patel on Fri, 12 Nov 1999:
> Hi,
> I am putting this problem here one more time. I have a swing
> application using
> JNI. Everything was wor
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> There isn't really a gdb-jdb combination. You can debug under gdb if
> you want to debug native code, but you won't get source-level Java
> debugging.
>
> There are some tricks to getting your debugging session started under
> gdb, because the breakpoint needs to be set in
There isn't really a gdb-jdb combination. You can debug under gdb if
you want to debug native code, but you won't get source-level Java
debugging.
There are some tricks to getting your debugging session started under
gdb, because the breakpoint needs to be set in a library (your JNI code)
that is
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> I think you didn't get an answer because, in general, people are
> successfully using Swing and JNI with the JDK1.2 and nobody recognized
> your problem.
Thanks for the response. I found the problem. Now i have some trouble in
native calls. I have Redhat Linux 6.0 with
I think you didn't get an answer because, in general, people are
successfully using Swing and JNI with the JDK1.2 and nobody recognized
your problem.
> I am using Linux6.0(glibc2.0) jdk1.2(blackdown).
> Is there any known problem with this transition??
Yes, there are known problems with the JDK1
Just download jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz from
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/JDK-1.1.7/i386/glibc/v3/
then
"cd /usr/local/"
"tar xzf jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz"
and put /usr/local/jdk117_v3/bin in your PATH.
-Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
