Hi Laura, Justin,
I stumbled upon these CONFIG names today. I assume they are wrong?
(full file name in quotes)
configs/fedora/generic/'CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB revisit this if performance isn't
horrible'
configs/fedora/generic/'CONFIG_DPM_WATCHDOG revisit this in debug'
Cheers,
Don
(cc'ing Dae Young)
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:41:36AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
> > I'm getting kernel panics in a VM that functions as a hypervisor, the moment
> > I spin up the nested guest (on AMD ThreadRipper / Fedora
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:00:03AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 12/20/2017 04:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > On 12/20/2017 09:39 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:39:26PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > > This patchset renames t
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 09:50 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
> > > index 965345c2a26e..b2a1ffbe843d 100
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) The v4.14.10 stable updates adds a new executable (tools/objtool/sync-
> check.sh). Somehow this was added non-executable during my local build of
> v4.14.10 (on fc26, that is). This made the build fail:
>
> [...]
> + make -s
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:39:26PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> This patchset renames the configs/base-{generic,debug} to
> configs/fedora/{generic,debug} and updates the scripts to reflect that.
Hi Jarod, Peter,
Does this approach work better?
Cheers,
Don
>
> Because the configs
It was suggested that base-debug and base-generic were not good names
to use. Further discussion led to using configs/fedora for the base
config files and configs/rhel for any overrides.
This patch does a plain
mkdir configs/fedora
git mv configs/base-{generic,debug} configs/fedora
No code
The previous patch moved the configs/base-{generic,debug} to configs/fedora.
Now we update the scripts to reflect that change. Changing the scripts
was straightforward. Handling overrides that didn't use generic names
was a little trickier.
To handle random override names (well rhel), I added
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On 2017-12-11 9:24 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:24:22PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > > It is, but was specifically added so kernels that want to do overrides
> > > > like
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:24:22PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > It is, but was specifically added so kernels that want to do overrides like
> > RHEL could add their own custom configs/debug and configs/generic.
> >
> > I am open to name changes but the goal was to use Fedora configs as a base
>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:34:18AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Laura Abbott <labb...@redh
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:34:18AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 11/10/2017 11:48 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Laura,
> >>
> >> As per our conversat
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:16PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
> Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
> tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
> experimenting with moving
Hi Laura,
As per our conversation, here is my pull request for the config changes:
https://pagure.io/fedora-kernel-dzickus.git rh_sync
As part of an effort to foster better cross collaboration with internal Red
Hat kernels, align the configs layout to match that kernel. This will allow
Red Hat
t doesn't work for you, feel
free to choose something else. :-) I do appreciate the feedback you
provided. I might work with folks on my team to address some of them as
they could be of benefit for our work too.
Cheers,
Don
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Cline <jer...
t; On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:02:05PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> It isn't documented in F27, but it does work. However, we probably
> >> want at least this patch:
> >> https:
you guys.
Cheers,
Don
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:09:26PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> I just looked at the code for lshw. The master branch already supports
> >> JSON. We jus
works on my F27 box, but I think we
have it running successfully under RHEL-7 too.
Cheers,
Don
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:16:24PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> I just played around w
stance. :-)
Cheers,
Don
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> For some time now, Fedora has operated without a database o
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:48:36PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> [1] https://github.com/npmccallum/census
> >> [2] https://github.com/npmccallum/census/blob/master/client/plugins/
> >> [3] https://github.com/npmccallum/census/pull/3
> >
> > Internally, we have been focusing on using 'lshw' as the
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> For some time now, Fedora has operated without a database of hardware
> users have. Smolt, the old hardware database, was retired in 2012[0] and
> its intended successor[1] was never deployed by Fedora Infrastructure.
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:38:25PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to
> generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These
> days, rpm has improved debuginfo support. The kernel has not kept up
> with this and it's
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > Mark W.,
> >
> > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
> > the kernel?
> >
> > &
defines.
Thanks Laura! Sorry about the previous version.
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com>
Mark W.,
Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
the kernel?
> @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel
> Bu
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:16:05AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>
> >> It's really not pretty, I spent at least a full day figuring out the
> >> regexes because I had no idea how they work. I'm sorely tempted to
> >> put some ascii art warning of the horrors within. More macros might help
> >>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:53:10PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 07:52 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:36:48PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> From: Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Once upon a time, t
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:36:48PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> From: Laura Abbott
>
> Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to
> generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These
> days, rpm has improved debuginfo support. The
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 08:49:24AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 06:58 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> &g
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > > I don't think it would be a bad idea to enable in ra
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:29:25PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 17:15 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > I noticed that CONFIG_MODVERSIONS was not enabled in Fedora. I do not know
> > the history and would be curious to know if someone knew.
> >
> &
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > I don't think it would be a bad idea to enable in rawhide and see how it
> > works out, from there it will trickle down as the stable releases get
> > rebased. While turning it on in theory shouldn't create a problem. I
> >
prevent various panics. Though Fedora traditionally
closes such bugs anyway.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com>
diff --git a/config-generic b/config-generic
index 7444895..e0e9387 100644
--- a/config-generic
+++ b/config-generic
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_MODULE_UN
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating
> the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series
> of files listing configuration choices (CONFIG_FOO=y, CONFIG_FOO
> is not set etc.) that get
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:42:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Will the exploded tree go away if we don't change to this model? Also
unclear. I'd hesitantly say it would stick around, but it might
change in the
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:17:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:42:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Will the exploded
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 05/06/2015 02:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com wrote:
One other thought: what happens when /boot is on the same file system as
/usr and/or /lib? Does the file get unnecessarily
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Meh, not in CC and not subscribed to kernel-list. Anyway...
On 04.05.2015 19:57, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 05/04/2015 01:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
So if I understand the patch correctly, your usecase will still be
valid as the
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Not that my opinion matters much, but I think this is an interesting
mind shift. The end result is the same as today, just extra files in
/lib/modules/`uname -r`, right?
Actually, I was hoping some other kernel maintainers would
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:50:38AM +0100, poma wrote:
Salutem
This happened only on thaw from S4 aka hibernate.
What should be strange power saving mode these messages relate!?
[ 208.252986] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3d on CPU 0.
[ 208.252991] Do you have a strange power
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:11:01PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
perf hardcodes $libdir to be lib for all but x86_64, so kludge around it
until upstream gets their act together.
Did you post this upstream too?
Cheers,
Don
--kyle
diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
index
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
TODO:
Right now this is what has been building in my COPR for the past week.
It works well on x86_64 (which is all I've tested), and i686 builds but
I know it's broken on ARM. To finish it up, I need:
1) Review from you all.
I
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:51:13PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
TODO:
Right now this is what has been building in my COPR for the past week.
It works well on x86_64
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I believe anaconda does install kernel today. So since the kernel
metapackage Requires:kernel-drivers, it will bring that in
automatically. Updates from existing installs would pick up kernel,
kernel-core, and kernel-drivers based
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:23:15AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Sandro red Mathys
r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I think Josh is mostly there. He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz + similar?
firmwre.
Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package. I didn't
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:16:00AM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:38:44AM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance
Exactly,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to really see any data
backing up necessity on any of this at all though. Right now it seems
to be sitting in the
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:25:12PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
For example, lets start with 100MB package requirement for the kernel (and
say 2 GB
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:28:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
This entire disk size optimization seems
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:33:41PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
We've been using merge.pl to merge Fedora's config file fragments for as
long as I can remember. However, in the interest of using what's
upstream, I took a look at the newly added merge_config.sh script and
what it would
please keep fedora kernel cc'd, there are better people who can answer
this than me.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19:26AM +0800, GaoYi wrote:
Hi Don,
Thanks very much for your prompt reply. I've tried your method to
modified the config-generic in the extracted path: /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/.
cc'ing fedora in case this helps others.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:51:43PM +0800, GaoYi wrote:
Hi Don,
I 've encounter the same error as your previous message:
http://markmail.org/message/6pkwdnxfhlh35cld#query:+page:1+mid:yf2bsyvd6l3g5rke+state:results
.
I would like to know
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:59:30AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
The easiest thing for you to do is to take the config option that is spit
out as an error (CONFIG_TIPC_UNICLUSTER_FRIENDLY and others in your link
above), and add
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:56:42PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello all,
I'm getting the $SUBJECT error when I try to
install a rawhide kernel on an updated f16 vm.
# rpm -ihv kernel-3.2.0-0.rc6.git0.1.pnfsdlexp.fc16.x86_64.rpm
Preparing...
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The digital picture are here:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz
According to our DM guys this fix just missed 3.1
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=f26d8f0562da76731cb049943a0e9d9fa81d946a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The digital picture are here:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz
According to our DM guys this fix just
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling
while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above commits, then you
would hit a BUG_ON. I would start looking at the btrfs bits to see if
they're holding
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:32:07PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:43:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
Not sure what the patch prefence is for the mailing list. This patch
applies
to the fedpkg kernel git tree. Better changelog below.
Waiting on test feedback
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:10:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:46 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
Here is a patch I was looking to post upstream. This should address your
concerns. Let me know how it works out for you.
0) Compiles cleanly.
1) Nothing shows up anymore
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:27 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
I am concerned about the error you are seeing, -95. Is it possible you can
provide me a 'dmesg' log of your boot up. I want to see what chipset the
perf subsystem thinks
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:38 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
[All] I am interested in is the few
lines above the NMI watchdog error that starts with Performance Events:
[0.016136] Performance Events:
[0.016139] no APIC, boot
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:16:33PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote:
Executing make oldconfig does not change that! DRM_NOVEAU group of
options are vital as they compile the driver for my video card and
if this is missing I am getting the VGA-style bootup screen and
everything is a mess - all this
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:03:04PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote:
Don Zickus wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:16:33PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote:
Executing make oldconfig does not change that! DRM_NOVEAU group of
options are vital as they compile the driver for my video card
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:38:32PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote:
Oh, I suck, I searched for DRM_NOVEAU instead of DRM_NOUVEAU.
I did exactly the same as you as my French is really crap!
Jarod figured it out. For some reason CONFIG_STAGING needs to be set to
'y' for DRM_NOUVEU to be enabled
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:12:23AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c has been removed upstream, so I'm wondering
how to merge this patch...
The most appropriate place to change the sample period appears to be
kernel/watchdog.c::get_sample_period and making the '5'
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:18:42AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
We could probably mimic the old linux-kernel-test.patch which was a stub
patch to allow developers to quickly test their patches without mucking
with the spec file, but instead for config files (like the %rhel thing).
I think
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:36:40PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote:
vi .config (this is to add the magic # x86_64 at the top)
I don't understand why you need a commented line???
What's the magic about it? A comment is ignored.
See the Fedora Wiki ( :-D ) for building the kernel - the target
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:14:08AM +, Mr Dash Four wrote:
See the Fedora Wiki ( :-D ) for building the kernel - the
target arch needs to be added as a comment on the first line of
that .config file (that is particularly important if I do
cross-compilation of the kernel - I add # i386 for
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:53:38PM -0800, JD wrote:
Thank you for the elucidation, Don. I find it very useful,
as I have struggled with this issue for a long time.
So, for a sysadmin, who needs a custom configured kernel
for multiple machines, and wants to produce the custom
binaries for
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:47:41PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
So, what do I do? I simply prep from source
(rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec)
and then cd to ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.35.10-74/linux-2.6.35.i686,
copy my current kernel's config file to .config, run
make oldconfig and
male all
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:50:25AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 10/27/2010 11:02 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
Not that I feel like arguing to save dangling symlink, what happens in the
case when you install kernel-devel-$KERNVER but there is no
kernel-$KERNVER installed to match? Does
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:10:23PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
kernel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/lib/modules/2.6.36-1.fc15.x86_64/build
../../../usr/src/kernels/2.6.36-1.fc15.x86_64
(It seems odd that /lib/modules/2.6.36-1.fc15.x86_64/build is packaged in
kernel, but
Now that kernel-firmware is no longer built, can we remove the pre-req so
we don't need to use --nodeps when installing a new kernel? Or am I
missing some other magic when installing?
Cheers,
Don
Index: kernel.spec
===
RCS file:
701 - 773 of 773 matches
Mail list logo