Release of logback version 1.0.9

2013-03-15 Thread Ceki Gülcü
/mailman/listinfo/announce You may also receive announcements via twitter via the following account: https://twitter.com/qos_ch Enjoy, -- Ceki Gülcü - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org

log4j v2 binding?

2011-09-07 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello Ralph, Could you please explain how bindings are done in log4j v2? I see that there are multiple artifacts produced such as log4j2-core.jar, log4j2-api.jar, log4j12-api.jar, log4j2-jcl.jar and slf4j-impl.jar. Are these supposed to be present on the class path simultaneously or at most

Re: log4j v2 binding?

2011-09-07 Thread Ceki Gülcü
A pointer to the class responsible for binding would be sufficient to get me going. On 07/09/2011 7:59 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Hello Ralph, Could you please explain how bindings are done in log4j v2? I see that there are multiple artifacts produced such as log4j2-core.jar, log4j2-api.jar

Re: log4j v2 binding?

2011-09-07 Thread Ceki Gülcü
. It all makes sense. On 07/09/2011 8:32 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: A pointer to the class responsible for binding would be sufficient to get me going. On 07/09/2011 7:59 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Hello Ralph, Could you please explain how bindings are done in log4j v2? I see that there are multiple

Re: log4j governance (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48704] Multiple Java Process...)

2010-02-19 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 19/02/2010 7:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: This said, why not having another election. I don't think its necessary, but if you feel better with that, lets do it. Elections should not be held just to assuage my feelings. Here is a list of team members:

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-19 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 20/02/2010 12:42 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Thanks Ceki for your long and detailled answer. You are right, i missed a word out in my mail - I meant if we would take logback as base for new development, as you suggested in a previous mail (so i understood it). I had not openly excluded

Re: svn commit: r909868 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/helpers/ tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j/ tests/witness/

2010-02-14 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 14/02/2010 7:05 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: On Feb 13, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Isn't the write method in PrudentWriter (see [1]) a copy-and-paste of code safeWrite() method in logback's FileAppender (see [2])? [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/trunk/src/main/java

Re: log4j governance (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48704] Multiple Java Process...)

2010-02-13 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 13/02/2010 5:59 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: I am due to file another quarterly board report and will mention your concerns. You are also free to petition the ASF Board. For background for those who are new to this topic. From http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair:

Re: log4j governance (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48704] Multiple Java Process...)

2010-02-13 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 13/02/2010 5:59 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: I believe the thread that you are thinking about is http://marc.info/?l=log4j-devm=122841935827332w=2. I was indeed thinking of the message you referenced above. You were arguing that log4j 1.2 should make a significant API change (changing

Re: svn commit: r909868 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/helpers/ tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j/ tests/witness/

2010-02-13 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Isn't the write method in PrudentWriter (see [1]) a copy-and-paste of code safeWrite() method in logback's FileAppender (see [2])? [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/helpers/PrudentWriter.java?revision=909868view=markuppathrev=909918 [2]

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 10/02/2010 6:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hi all, I would like to bring up the old discussion on future Log4J development again. I think christmas killed it before there was an satisfying conclusion. I was basically asking if Log4J is dead or not; several opinions rose. There is logback

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 10/02/2010 7:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Another option would be to declare logback as the official successor to log4j, i.e. designate it as log4j 2.0. yes - that would be the most perfect solution i think. But are you willing to do bring the code back to apache? Sorry, I wasn't

Re: Fwd: Future development of Log4J?

2009-12-11 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hi Christian, Have a look at logback. It is the continuation of the log4j 1.3 effort, with 4 years of additional work. -- Ceki Christian Grobmeier wrote: originally sent to the wrong list, sorry for the crosspost :-) -- Forwarded message -- From: Christian Grobmeier

Re: Fwd: Future development of Log4J?

2009-12-11 Thread Ceki Gülcü
on the log4j work. Best regards, Christian On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Ceki Gülcü c...@qos.ch wrote: Hi Christian, Have a look at logback. It is the continuation of the log4j 1.3 effort, with 4 years of additional work. -- Ceki

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2009-12-11 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Ralph Goers wrote: This is actually my biggest issue with Logback (and SLF4J). I've been thinking recently of starting work on Log4j 2.0 simply because I do not like the community model of Logback. This is no criticism of you - it should go without saying that you are extremely talented. But

Re: RollingFileAppender drops append mode after a rollover

2009-12-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: In RollingFileAppender.rollOver() after a successful roll over is this code to create the new active file: 187 if (renameSucceeded) { 188 try { 189 // This will also close the file. This is OK since multiple 190 // close operations are safe. 191

Re: Serious resource leak in Log4J/Log4JLogger

2009-12-09 Thread Ceki Gülcü
about. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch emerson.cla...@barclayscapital.com wrote: When running Apache Tomcat 5.0.28 configured with Apache Commons Logging and Log4J there appears to be a serious resource leak which

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

2007-04-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
users to recompile. On the other hand, natively implementing SLF4J will work much better in presence of repo-selectors. Jake cheers, -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

2007-04-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
point of view I think many of the Java 1.4+ network library, and java.util.concurrent stuff could be well used in a new logging package. I would certainly be interested in Chainsaw v3. How about doing it in logback? Paul -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

2007-04-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
to be compatible with log4j. [snip] -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

2007-04-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
concern is to produce the best library possible within the constraints imposed by the resources available. As such, although important, backward compatibility is not my ultimate yardstick. It is easy to qualify each and every incompatible change as reckless. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

2007-04-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
to should not be broken, however. +1 Other than myself, I am unaware of anyone else with the same opinion. Others may agree, but they usually don't express it as clearly as above. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch

Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand

2007-04-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
asserted by the one writing the longest email. Not fun. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

2007-04-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
to decorate a class with a marker which could be pretty useful indeed. cheers, Paul Smith -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Logging Domains committed to sandbox (dodgy cvs spam email address though)

2007-04-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
to be to identify concerns that cut across the established hierarchy and the expected use appears to be as an aid to configuration. Markers (as do domains) create a second dimension for filtering. The TRACE marker in the logback-demo might be of interest. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic

Re: Enhanced FileAppender

2006-10-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Patrick's suggestion of Decorator Pattern would be the easiest way to go. Pro: - The enhancement applies to all FileAppender - There is no need to touch the code of the existing file appenders. They work the same way as until now (except the append property is always true) [snip] Heri -- Ceki

Re: 1.3 build

2006-04-05 Thread Ceki Gülcü
opinions? -Mark -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Log4j wiki under attack?

2006-03-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4j/http%3a/cricinfo%2ecom New page: Describe http://www.cricinfo.com here. -- Ceki Gülcü http://ceki.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r372954 - /logging/log4j/trunk/lib/

2006-01-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Date: Fri Jan 27 11:39:04 2006 New Revision: 372954 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372954view=rev Log: Remove unused svn clients from lib Removed: logging/log4j/trunk/lib/ -- Ceki Gülcü - To unsubscribe, e-mail

RE: Experimental log4j formatter in sandbox

2006-01-26 Thread Ceki Gülcü
that the implementation does not immediately convert parameterized messages into string but keeps myObject available for further processing. I am doing exactly this in LOGBack, my experimental logging system. There is no reason why log4j couldn't do the same. -- Ceki Gülcü

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-25 Thread Ceki Gülcü
is no longer valid? -Mark -- Ceki Gülcü - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Experimental log4j formatter in sandbox

2006-01-12 Thread Ceki Gülcü
effortless, especially since the SLF4J is now quite stable. Unless there is opposition, I'd like to take the initiative to restore native SLF4J support in 1.3. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: Exploration of use of Maven for site generation and build

2005-12-19 Thread Ceki Gülcü
-dev? My guess would be that it would not be difficult at all. In the unlikely case of problems while upgrading, is there any reason the velocity-user list could not be contacted? The characterization of the current system as unmaintainable may be somewhat premature. -- Ceki Gülcü

Fwd: [jira] Closed: (INFRA-309) Move log4j CVS repositories to SVN

2005-09-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
in advance, -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Possible API Performance and Usability Enhancement

2005-08-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
message, Object obj0) debug(String message, Object obj0, Object obj1) debug(String message, Object obj0, Object obj1, Object obj2) Throwable ... - Dan -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

RE: log4j 1.3 minimum JDK (was Re: [VOTE] Release log4j 1.2.12rc3)

2005-08-16 Thread Ceki Gülcü
, they certainly aren't of the mind to upgrade Log4j or anything else. JDK1.5 is out and 1.6 is in development. It's time to put JDK1.2 to rest which will allow us to make promises we can stand by! Jake -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: Log4j in tomcat common/lib and in WEB-INF/lib

2005-07-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
, ContextJNDISelector does not cause memory leaks. Previous versions of log4j (e.g. 1.2) did not ship with any selectors. Regards, Simon -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-06-18 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 02:50 AM 6/18/2005, Simon Kitching wrote: No doubt that you are right but I wonder how you reached this conclusion? The java.lang.VerifyError is so cryptic. Which version of the JDK are you using? The output is the same on JDK 1.3 and JDK 1.5. I wrote a trivial test program that just

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/xdocs codes.xml contributors.xml

2005-06-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
ceki2005/06/17 01:19:50 Modified:src/xdocs codes.xml contributors.xml Log: Removed email attribute in authors tag (with my name). I suggest others do the same to reduce spam. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +1 -1 logging-log4j/src/xdocs/codes.xml Index:

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/xdocs history.xml plan.xml earlier.xml download.xml documentation.xml index.xml faq.xml

2005-06-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
ceki2005/06/17 01:20:53 Modified:src/xdocs history.xml plan.xml earlier.xml download.xml documentation.xml index.xml faq.xml Log: Removed email attribute in authors tag (with my name). I suggest others do the same to reduce spam. Revision Changes

RE: JUnit Errors in 1.2.11 build

2005-06-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: JUnit Errors in 1.2.11 build

2005-06-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Overview Proposal

2005-05-18 Thread Ceki Gülcü
the TRACE level to the 1.2 branch? -Mark -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Overview Proposal

2005-05-18 Thread Ceki Gülcü
habits, especially in light of the confusion between TRACE and DEBUG. There is also the question of backward compatibility over the wire. If TRACE was introduced in 1.2.11 it would be incompatible with versions 1.2.9 and earlier. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch

Release of NLOG4J version 1.2.11

2005-05-15 Thread Ceki Gülcü
version 1.2.11, including full source code, class files and documentation at http://www.slf4j.org/download.html -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

SVN migration put on hold

2005-05-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
For your information, I've asked infrastructure to put on hold the log4j migration to SVN [1]. This should allow the new PMC chair and the group to decide the layout of the SVN repo as deemed most appropriate. [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-309 -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j

Re: [VOTE] Tag the CVS for 1.2.10 and revert the slf4j related changes on 1.2 branch

2005-05-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
not sure he asked or informed anyone but that's a different mater. Jake -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Tag the CVS for 1.2.10 and revert the slf4j related changes on 1.2 branch

2005-05-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
is a vote. -Mark -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:48 AM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tag the CVS for 1.2.10 and revert the slf4j related changes on 1.2 branch At 16:48 5/4/2005, Jacob Kjome wrote: I like Mark's

RE: [VOTE] Tag the CVS for 1.2.10 and revert the slf4j related changes on 1.2 branch

2005-05-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
will all be more comfortable doing the official release. Until then, there is nothing wrong with doing an official experimental release. Maybe I am optimistic, but that is the way I see it. -Mark -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005

Re: [ANN] Log4j version 1.2.10 recalled

2005-05-01 Thread Ceki Gülcü
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: slf4j and log4j

2005-05-01 Thread Ceki Gülcü
* plus any committer on log4j * plus any committer on JCL all be entitled to vote, and that voting follow standard ASF procedures. Do you mind if we continue this discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Regards, Simon -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: slf4j and log4j

2005-05-01 Thread Ceki Gülcü
of Apache, but that is a different discussion, and we are where we are. -Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http

Re: slf4j license

2005-05-01 Thread Ceki Gülcü
: Daniel Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Importing X11 licensed code Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Come to think of it, I think the answer to my earlier question is pretty obvious. Since we have the right

Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-12 (in module logging-log4j-12) failed

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
=== Produced by Gump version 2.2. Gump Run 2729042005, brutus:brutus-public:2729042005 Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #10. -- Apache Gump http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: brutus] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: to-do list

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
to be overkill for log4j's needs. However, the implementation may be much more shaky in log4cxx and having similar tests in both log4j and log4cxx makes it easier to ensure that they behave similarly. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Release of log4j version 1.2.10

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
in the desired implementation at deployment time. For more details about SLF4J, see http://www.slf4j.org You can download log4j version 1.2.10 at http://logging.apache.org/site/binindex.html -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

RE: Release of log4j version 1.2.10

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
, It would have been nice to have a vote on this release, no? ;) No big deal. Thanks for putting it together so quickly. Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management / School of Engineering Cambridge, MA USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü

Re: to-do list

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
:16 4/29/2005, Curt Arnold wrote: On Apr 29, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Log4j and log4cxx are distinct code bases written in different languages. I oppose any artificial attempts to make Java code mimic C++ particularities, idiosyncrasies, deficiencies or a combination thereof

Re: UGLI not completely exorcised

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
That's normal because the code comes from UGLI. At 22:08 4/29/2005, you wrote: demon is the slf4j 1.0 beta (LoggerFactoryAdapter.java), there are references to UGLi in the comments. thanks -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

RE: Release of log4j version 1.2.10

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
surrounding this release. Consequently, I may have rushed it a little, hoping for your continued support and understanding. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Importing code which is X11 (BSD) licensed

2005-04-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

UGLI replaced with SLF4J

2005-04-28 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello all, Just completed the migration to SLF4J for log4j in the CVS repository (HEAD). It all seems to build and run nicely. Will do the same for the 1.2 branch along with minor bugs reported for the 1.2 branch. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

UGLI replaced by SLF4J

2005-04-22 Thread Ceki Gülcü
from the commons-dev community as well as Apache Logging Services to share their knowledge in more open and cordial atmosphere. We'll see how it goes. :-) -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: to-do list

2005-04-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
(sequenceCount and serialization). I have the sneaking suspicion that XMLLayout may not handle some edge cases and will want to work up some tests to confirm it. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: minimal logj, deps

2005-04-15 Thread Ceki Gülcü
compatibility is required and what platform constraints there are) while having a more Chaitinian overall distribution. Frankly, you have no interest in a more decoupled stucture? - Ricardo --- Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:30 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote: hi devs 1.3 is in alpha so I take

Moving to subversion

2005-04-14 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello, On general@ I started a discussion whether we should begin our migration to SVN starting with log4j. If you intend to reply, please do so on the general@ mailing lists. Cheers, -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: minimal logj, deps

2005-04-14 Thread Ceki Gülcü
-- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[POLL] Moving UGLI outside Apache?

2005-04-06 Thread Ceki Gülcü
think starting a new project, based or similar to UGLI outside the ASF is an option worth exploring? Other comments? Opinions? -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [POLL] Moving UGLI outside Apache?

2005-04-06 Thread Ceki Gülcü
as well as Apache Logging Services to share their knowledge in more open and cordial atmosphere. Do you think starting a new project, based or similar to UGLI outside the ASF is an option worth exploring? Other comments? Opinions? -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

Re: [POLL] Moving UGLI outside Apache?

2005-04-06 Thread Ceki Gülcü
official answers for these questions? If not, then the move is fine for UGLI but maybe not so fine (or maybe just irrelevant) for JCL. Jake -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [POLL] Moving UGLI outside Apache?

2005-04-06 Thread Ceki Gülcü
not so fine (or maybe just irrelevant) for JCL. Jake Quoting Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Greetings to all, As a result of discussions held on this list and on commons-dev, I think starting a new project based on or similar to UGLI outside Apache Logging Services would benefit the wider OS community

Re: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-26 Thread Ceki Gülcü
that your opinion will carry considerable amount of weight in the jakarta commons side of the fence. Regards, Simon -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-26 Thread Ceki Gülcü
candidate), call it 'JCL 2.0', encourage everyone to use it, and we can all get on with life. --Jeff -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

RE: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
probably break backwards compatibility, but it will work. How can we have confidence when the existing JCL causes so many problems for log4j users, especially when even the mere existence of these problems have been denied for so long? It seems unrealistic, doesn't it? -- Ceki Gülcü The complete

RE: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
, but can it be done? Yoav -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
intended) and an unfamiliar one, leading to yet another logging interface discussions. Point well taken. Any alternative names on your mind? I'm all ears. :-) -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j

RE: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
for accessing (frontend), the component for accessing then can be used by wrappers or extended with special (existing?) interfaces. Yes, this has been partially accomplished by UGLI log4j split, although as you suggest, there is still more work to do. Boris -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http

RE: JDJ - log4j vs java.util.logging

2005-03-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
, then it would behoove them to contact the Log4j list, in which case I would most definitely see it. YAIQ (yet another interesting question) Jake Yoav -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe

Re: ThrowableInformation.getThrowable()

2005-03-16 Thread Ceki Gülcü
intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests/witness/xml dom.A1.3 dom.A2.3

2005-03-07 Thread Ceki Gülcü
) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Additions to the Appender interface

2005-03-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
It is fairly obvious that Curt's veto was sustained by all voters except for me. I'll comment on the vote after I sort out more urgent tasks, such as tax return and other really interesting administravia. At 07:14 PM 2/28/2005, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Curt, your -1 vote is duly registered as blocking

RE: Appender, ErrorHanlder fail over deadlock

2005-03-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
project. As an organizational policy we cannot use 1.3 until it's been officially release. So, in the meantime I'm going to have to create a thread I guess to do the switching. I'll switch over to 1.3 after you release it. Al -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Appender, ErrorHanlder fail over deadlock

2005-03-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
tagged as a syncronized object. So your blocking on the monitor. JProfiler clearly shows this. Al -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:17 PM To: Log4J Developers List; Log4J Developers List Subject: RE: Appender, ErrorHanlder fail over

[VOTE] Additions to the Appender interface

2005-02-28 Thread Ceki Gülcü
compatibility with very minimal additional complexity. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Additions to the Appender interface

2005-02-28 Thread Ceki Gülcü
benefits to offset the cost needed in user effort. Yoav -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AppenderSkeleton.isActive, etc

2005-02-26 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 12:01 AM 2/26/2005, Curt Arnold wrote: On Feb 25, 2005, at 3:22 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 09:48 PM 2/25/2005, Curt Arnold wrote: I can't stress how strongly that I believe these changes are bad and will unnecessarily cause some users of 1.2 to stay with log4j 1.2 or encounter broken behavior

Re: Design and evoluton of log4j (Was: AppenderSkeleton.isActive, etc)

2005-02-26 Thread Ceki Gülcü
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Reverting Appender interface

2005-02-25 Thread Ceki Gülcü
the patch now. I hope it wasn't too late now. Thanks Knut. --knut -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AppenderSkeleton.isActive, etc

2005-02-25 Thread Ceki Gülcü
. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AppenderSkeleton.isActive, etc

2005-02-25 Thread Ceki Gülcü
maintain on the long term. -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE]: Chainsaw as seperate module

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
a seperate sub-project until after establishing a cleanly seperated CVS/build environment is in operation. 4. Propose that all existing log4j committers still have full access to this new module. +1 [ ] Make it so 0 [ ] *yawn* -1 [ ] Leave Chainsaw where it is cheers, Paul Smith -- Ceki Gülcü

Re: Gump issues

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
analyze their issues but the circumstantial evidence suggest that we broke them too. Let me have a closer look and get back to you. :-) -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Gump issues

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 05:47 PM 2/24/2005, Ceki Gülcü wrote: That makes sense because the recent additions are compile-time compatible with existing appenders. The above statement is true for any appender extending AppenderSkeleton because AppenderSkeleton implements the methods newly added to the Appender

Re: Reverting Appender interface

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using log4j Appender classes in java.util.logging

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
not be the case. At any rate, if you are interested in including them in log4j, just ask me. Regards -- Javier Cámara (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]) Software Architect, Software AG España, S.A. Ronda de la Luna, 22; 28760 Tres Cantos (Spain) +34 91 807 9400, fax +34 91 807 9447 -- Ceki

Re: log4j release?

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
. Is there anything else major that needs to be done for v1.3? - Watchdogs (FileWatchdog, HttpWatchdog, SocketWatchdog) - ? -Mark -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/joran/action Action.java RepositoryPropertyAction.java

2005-02-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
to use it instead of referencing element 0 of the ec. -Mark -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 10:41 AM To: Log4J Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: logging- log4j/src/java

Re: Chainsaw as seperate CVS module?

2005-02-23 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Chainsaw as a separate project is also a possibility. If Chainsaw is in its own module, a separate project could make sense. Paul Smith -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail

RE: Use NOT the first log4j.xml file but the last from classpath

2005-02-23 Thread Ceki Gülcü
be interesting to explore having the initialization behavior configurable. But, again my opinion, it would have to be done in a way where it requires explicit effort on the part of the developer/deployer to setup and override. No guess work. :-) -Mark -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4j manual: http

Re: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/joran/action Action.java RepositoryPropertyAction.java

2005-02-23 Thread Ceki Gülcü
(ExecutionContext ec, Properties props) { LoggerRepository repository = getLoggerRepository(ec); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ceki Gülcü The complete

  1   2   3   4   5   >