Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Rino Mardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: Hmm, that could be the reason why I'm getting a repetition operand invalid. Yes. :-) * means "any number (0 or more) of the character just before", so using * alone doesn't make sense, as there is no character just before it. * works as

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that: On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 16:41:12 -0400, David T-G wrote: Yeah. I've since learned that there isn't any sort of "documentation group" for mutt, so we have nobody to ask. Time to call for volunteers, I don't volunteer to write. It must be a job for

Re: Qmail isn't delivering to MAILDIR/new....?

2000-06-30 Thread clemensF
Jason Helfman: I have this as my .qmail file: /home/deklown/Maildir/new/ the maildir is an object of it's own, and it's structure is taken care of by the software. leave out that fg new/! clemens

Re: Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To

2000-06-30 Thread Hugo Haas
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote: This is *one* example where trying to set up Reply-To properly would fail, as: 1) I'm required to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the From address, or I can't post to the list without approval 2) I still want to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my public address

[OT] Re: Qmail isn't delivering to MAILDIR/new....?

2000-06-30 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 09:31:17PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: Sorry to be off topic, but Jason, I answered your emails via personal addressed one. Now I got some failure notices. I assume that they are from your pesonal qmail. I can send them upton request. Frank

Re: UTF-8?

2000-06-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-06-29 19:36:24 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: Can Mutt 1.2 handle UTF-8? Only on the receiving side. When I have $charset="iso-8859-13", and $send_charset="utf-8", bad things happen. BTW, I have glibc 2.1.3. For heavily improved utf-8 support (including the use of UTF-8 as the

Re: Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To

2000-06-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-06-30 01:10:22 -0400, Hugo Haas wrote: It makes sense. Now I'm convinced that Mail-Followup-To is useful. I'll still be frustrated, but I am convinced. :-) I found an Internet Draft about it, but it expired 2 years ago:

Re: Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To

2000-06-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: Maybe it's time to write a new one. According to DJB, the IETF is not going to accept Mail-Followup-To, which, he claims, is the reason why he doesn't write any more drafts. Hmm, that's DJB... Wonder what the real story is, why

default mbox for cc'd messages

2000-06-30 Thread Eugene Lee
When I am replying to messages, I'd like to have carbon copies stored in my current mailbox. I was hoping the following might work: set record=. Mutt does send the message, but it does not generate a carbon copy in the current mailbox. Is there a way to do this? Or do I just have to

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Mrinal Kalakrishnan proclaimed on mutt-users that: Why don't you post each FAQ to the list as each one is done (all in one thread) so that people can suggest changes, as well as track it's development? 'k. Here (as printed in lynx) is what index.html will look like ... (thanks to Sven for a

Re: default mbox for cc'd messages

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Eugene Lee proclaimed on mutt-users that: When I am replying to messages, I'd like to have carbon copies stored in my current mailbox. I was hoping the following might work: set record=. Try set record="." -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I don't think they could put

Re: default mbox for cc'd messages

2000-06-30 Thread Lars Hecking
Eugene Lee writes: When I am replying to messages, I'd like to have carbon copies stored in my current mailbox. I was hoping the following might work: set record=. Mutt does send the message, but it does not generate a carbon copy in the current mailbox. Is there a way to do

Re: default mbox for cc'd messages

2000-06-30 Thread Eugene Lee
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:18:50PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: : Eugene Lee proclaimed on mutt-users that: : : When I am replying to messages, I'd like to have carbon copies stored : in my current mailbox. I was hoping the following might work: : : set record=. : : Try : : set

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: Oops, what I meant is probably something like this: folder-hook . set record='+read' Another oops. I wonder how come nobody else caught this yet and corrected me? :-) Anyway, I shouldn't be talking about $record, I mean $mbox of

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Suresh Ramasubramanian typed: * Using multiple e-mail addresses in Mutt * Managing mailing lists with Mutt * Using keybindings to customize mutt * Color setups for folder index, mail header and mail body * managing mails via IMAP * managing mails via POP * using digital signatures *

Re: default mbox for cc'd messages

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Eugene Lee proclaimed on mutt-users that: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:18:50PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: : Eugene Lee proclaimed on mutt-users that: : : When I am replying to messages, I'd like to have carbon copies stored : in my current mailbox. I was hoping the following might

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Richard Curnow
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:05:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: Reading the documentation on $move and $mbox, it turns out that this feature is only enabled for the spool mailbox, so apparently you can't use it to auto-save

Re: UTF-8?

2000-06-30 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:42:26AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 2000-06-29 19:36:24 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: Can Mutt 1.2 handle UTF-8? Only on the receiving side. OK. Maybe this should be documented before 1.2.3 goes out? For heavily improved utf-8 support (including the use

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Mrinal Kalakrishnan proclaimed on mutt-users that: Suresh Ramasubramanian typed: * Using multiple e-mail addresses in Mutt done * Managing mailing lists with Mutt mostly done * Using keybindings to customize mutt to do * Color setups for folder index, mail header and mail body done

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:01:47PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Why don't you post each FAQ to the list as each one is done (all in one thread) so that people can suggest changes, as well as track it's development? [...] The original author of Mutt was Michael Elkins. (I think

Re: emacs mutt

2000-06-30 Thread Gunther Kuhlmann
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000, Charles Curley wrote: - 1.) what does emacs vs emacs client mean? I read that I must run emacs - and mutt on the same host.. I don't understand the overall picture - with this. Why/how is this different from specifying Pico in the - .muttrc file? What is a server? I

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marius Gedminas proclaimed on mutt-users that: The original author of Mutt was Michael Elkins. (I think ME still *is* the original author.) grammatically speaking, he was, is and will be :) my_hdr From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] This won't fix your (I mean, the

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Richard Curnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: Is mbox-hook what you're after? Yes, that's what I meant. I thought I *knew* there was a way to do it, just forgot what it was. Then got confused by the $mbox explanation which doesn't talk about mbox-hook at all.. Maybe I should

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:35:40AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that: On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 16:41:12 -0400, David T-G wrote: Yeah. I've since learned that there isn't any sort of "documentation group" for mutt, so we have nobody to ask.

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that: Perhaps you all will consider contributing anyway. Whether an author is a native Engish speaker or not, all of the draft documentation should be edited for a consistent grammar, style, spelling etc. I am a native English speaker -- OK, American --

Re: emacs mutt

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 01:10:14PM +0100, Gunther Kuhlmann muttered: On Wed, Jun 21, 2000, Charles Curley wrote: - 1.) what does emacs vs emacs client mean? I read that I must run emacs - and mutt on the same host.. I don't understand the overall picture - with this. Why/how is this

Re: UTF-8?

2000-06-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-06-30 13:46:22 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: I didn't know Mutt-1.3.x supported utf-8 display without additional patches. Most of the changes made to the unstable branch so far were precisely about that. I guess it still needs a utf-8 enabled slang, right? Yes.

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread David T-G
Suresh, et al -- ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said... % Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that: Actually, nothing pertinent to this question, I don't think... % % Mrinal's idea of using CVS for this is pretty good, given such a % situation. % % Could some kind soul please

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Lars Hecking
Mrinal's idea of using CVS for this is pretty good, given such a situation. Could some kind soul please contribute a CVS repository for this? I lost track of this thread. The Mutt Documentation Project? Use SourceForge.

Re: Removing a prefix from the subject of messages

2000-06-30 Thread Lars Hecking
Jose Romildo Malaquias writes: Hello. I want to remove a prefix from the messages coming from a mailing list I am subscribed before saving the messages in its folder. Currently my procmail recipes for saving the message is DUMMY=`test -d linux-br || mkdir linux-br` :0:

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:01:47PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered: Mrinal Kalakrishnan proclaimed on mutt-users that: Why don't you post each FAQ to the list as each one is done (all in one thread) so that people can suggest changes, as well as track it's development? 'k. Here

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 05:19:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered: Mrinal Kalakrishnan proclaimed on mutt-users that: Suresh Ramasubramanian typed: * using digital signatures Has to be done I just recently got GPG running, so may be able to do something there. And one more

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Suresh Ramasubramanian typed: Is this some local CVS? How about putting it on the mutt CVS I plan to do this - someplace like sourceforge say? Yeah - that would be nice. Maybe - mutt-guide.sourceforge.net? I can set that up if required - just give me a holler. I'm jobless for 24 hours a

default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread j mckitrick
hi all, i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color defintions, mutt chokes when loading. it complains about an invalid color or something like that. yes the manual shows it is an acceptable option.

Re: those users (documenting mutt)

2000-06-30 Thread Rebecca Lynne Sutton
I've started work on one - and Sven Guckes Robin Socha have been really helpful on this. Perhaps you all will consider contributing anyway. Whether an author is a native Engish speaker or not, all of the draft documentation should be edited for a consistent grammar, style, spelling

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, David T-G typed: % Could some kind soul please contribute a CVS repository for this? Show me how and I'll be happy to. mutt.sector13.org will be coming on line soon for this sort of stuff. You really want to take the trouble? Or is mutt-guide.sourceforge.net enough? If we register with

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Lars Hecking typed: Mrinal's idea of using CVS for this is pretty good, given such a situation. Could some kind soul please contribute a CVS repository for this? I lost track of this thread. The Mutt Documentation Project? Yeah. Use SourceForge. I was about to create a project

Re: emacs mutt

2000-06-30 Thread Gunther Kuhlmann
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000, Charles Curley wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 01:10:14PM +0100, Gunther Kuhlmann muttered: On Wed, Jun 21, 2000, Charles Curley wrote: If you don't need the portability, this will do: (server-start) I am currently starting xemacs for each mail I

default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread j mckitrick
hi all, i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color defintions, mutt chokes when loading. it complains about an invalid color or something like that. yes the manual shows it is an acceptable option.

Re: emacs mutt

2000-06-30 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 30 June 2000 at 13:10, Gunther Kuhlmann wrote: I am currently starting xemacs for each mail I write (from mutt). So I added (server-start) into my .emacs file, but it came up with the following error: Signaling: (void-function server-start) (server-start) What am I doing

Re: default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, j mckitrick wrote: i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color defintions, mutt chokes when loading. it complains about an invalid color or something like that. yes the manual

Re: default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread j mckitrick
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:35:24AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, j mckitrick wrote: i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color defintions, mutt chokes when loading. it

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread David T-G
Mrinal -- ...and then Mrinal Kalakrishnan said... % Hi, Hello! % % David T-G typed: % % Could some kind soul please contribute a CVS repository for this? % Show me how and I'll be happy to. mutt.sector13.org will be coming on % line soon for this sort of stuff. % % You really want to

Re: default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, j mckitrick wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:35:24AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, j mckitrick wrote: i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color

Re: emacs mutt

2000-06-30 Thread Pierluigi Miraglia
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 01:10:14PM +0100, Gunther Kuhlmann wrote: I am currently starting xemacs for each mail I write (from mutt). So I added (server-start) into my .emacs file, but it came up with the following error: Signaling: (void-function server-start) (server-start) )

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that: The original author of Mutt was Michael Elkins. And still is, as has been noted. Was, is and will be. If the grammar's bad, please do excuse me :) Mutt has much more features than Microsoft Outlook Express and other many

Re: those users (FAQ)

2000-06-30 Thread Kai Blin
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:01:47PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Why don't you post each FAQ to the list as each one is done (all in one thread) so that people can suggest changes, as well as track it's development? 'k. Here (as printed in lynx) is what index.html will look like

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Kai Blin
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 05:19:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: imap and pop using mutt's checking features _and_ using fetchmail. Being worked on - but I am thinking of how to differentiate betn when to use mutt's imap features and when to poll mails using fetchmail. I don't use

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Kai Blin
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:16:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: If GPL is a-ok with y'all it's a-ok with me. Now _please_ don't start a license war over this ;) I think that a manual should come with the same license as the program. Kai --

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Kai Blin proclaimed on mutt-users that: I don't use imap all that often here - so someone who reads imap folders with mutt extensively could help a bit ... I do all my mail stuff with IMAP/SSL, what do you need for help? Put together a short howto on this - with all the "gotchas" - about

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Kai Blin proclaimed on mutt-users that: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:16:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: If GPL is a-ok with y'all it's a-ok with me. Now _please_ don't start a license war over this ;) I think that a manual should come with the same license as the program. so

Re: emacs mutt

2000-06-30 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 30 June 2000 at 13:35, Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote: xemacs uses a different name for it: (gnuserv-start) but I don't use it. So far I've been too lazy to write a script which starts xemacs if it isn't

tag-thread works sporadically

2000-06-30 Thread brd
I've noticed that when tryting to tag a whole thread with the esc-t combo, sometimes it will work and sometimes not. I may have to do it a few times before it works, but it's not the same number each time. I think I've noticed the same thing with body search esc-b, so maybe it's a bigger

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread David Champion
On 2000.06.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mrinal Kalakrishnan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version, plain text, PS, PDF, etc.. (like the mutt docs) The

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
David Champion proclaimed on mutt-users that: On 2000.06.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mrinal Kalakrishnan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version, plain text, PS,

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:22:03PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered: Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that: Get up and running with mutt Mutt will work out of the box, but there are a few things which may have to be tweaked. For example, you might want to get

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread David Champion
On 2000.06.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Suresh Ramasubramanian" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: get them processed on Unix. Maybe that's not necessary, but I always argue with any decision that (in practice) drives data or a process out of the realm of portability. ... so what format do you

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 01:16:34PM -0600, Charles Curley muttered: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:22:03PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered: Charles Curley proclaimed on mutt-users that: Get up and running with mutt Mutt will work out of the box, but there are a few

Re: tag-thread works sporadically

2000-06-30 Thread David Champion
On 2000.06.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "brd" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed that when tryting to tag a whole thread with the esc-t combo, sometimes it will work and sometimes not. I may have to do it a few times before it works, but it's not the same number each time. I think

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi Charles! On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Charles Curley wrote: OK, then perhaps, " Other installation options add code for features such as colored text, Gnu regular expressions, GSS, IMAP, PGP, and SSL. Make that GNU. It's an acronym: "Gnu's Not Unix." ^^^ Make

Re: imap_checkinterval doesn't seem to be working

2000-06-30 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:38:38PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote: I am using mutt 1.3.3 and reading my mail off a Courier IMAP server. I have imap_checkinterval = 10. My understanding is that that is how long it will wait to check mail when I am not actually pressing any keys. No, that's what

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Suresh Ramasubramanian typed: ... so what format do you suggest? HTML is the best - still (imho) IMHO, HTML is clumsy, and is not structured like LinuxDoc is for documentation. Anyway, lets see.. :-) -- Mrinal Kalakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mrinal.dhs.org/ Linux 2.2.16 ||

Re: those users (was Re: Reply to all???)

2000-06-30 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, David Champion typed: The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version, plain text, PS, PDF, etc.. (like the mutt docs) The disadvantage, last time I checked, is that it's still tedious to get

Re: imap_checkinterval doesn't seem to be working

2000-06-30 Thread Ben Beuchler
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:54:46PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:38:38PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote: I am using mutt 1.3.3 and reading my mail off a Courier IMAP server. I have imap_checkinterval = 10. My understanding is that that is how long it will wait to

Re: tag-thread works sporadically

2000-06-30 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:42:25PM -0500, David Champion wrote: On 2000.06.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "brd" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed that when tryting to tag a whole thread with the esc-t combo, sometimes it will work and sometimes not. I may have to do it a few times

Default SUBJECT in forward..

2000-06-30 Thread Sergio Bruder
There is a way to alter the default Subject of a forwarded message? -- Sergio D. Bruder [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.conectiva.com.br http://sergio.bruder.net http://pontobr.org

Re: Default SUBJECT in forward..

2000-06-30 Thread David Champion
On 2000.06.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Sergio Bruder" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a way to alter the default Subject of a forwarded message? set forward_format. The %-expansions are teh same as for $index_format. -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago

default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread j mckitrick
hi all, i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color defintions, mutt chokes when loading. it complains about an invalid color or something like that. yes the manual shows it is an acceptable option.

Re: default color definition

2000-06-30 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 30-Jun-2000, j mckitrick wrote: i am trying to get mutt to work with a transparent wterm. however, when i chose 'default' as the background color for each of my color defintions, mutt chokes when loading. it complains about an invalid color or something like that. yes the manual shows

Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Jason Helfman
I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but in the mean time, why is there a (0) byte indication in the index of every message that comes in??? -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession."

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Brian D. Winters
I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but Have you tried: |preline procmail in your .qmail file? (I believe that this is in the qmail documentation somewhere.) in the mean time, why is there a (0) byte indication in the index of every message that comes in???

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Jason Helfman
/.qmail file /home/deklown/Maildir/ |preline -f /usr/bin/procmail On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:14:54PM -0700, Brian D. Winters muttered: | I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but | | Have you tried: | | |preline procmail | | in your .qmail file? (I believe

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:27:56PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: |preline -f /usr/bin/procmail I'm not sure about the -f. I don't use it in my .qmail, but based on the description in the man page I don't see why it would cause procmail to fail either. My guess would be that you are having

maildirs and Lines:

2000-06-30 Thread Brian D. Winters
(I checked the archives, and although this has been asked before, no one had a good answer. Hopefully someone will have a better idea this time around, or I missed the answer in the archives.) I use maildirs, but I prefer to see lines rather than sizes in the message index. I've been using the