Re: [MLO] Is there ever going to be a web app for MLO?

2023-06-28 Thread SRhyse
If you used MLO to manage a team online, I imagine it’d turn into micromanaging. On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 11:13:03 AM UTC-7 imajeff wrote: > Wow KC I don't think that assumption is worth 2 cents to anyone actually > trying to manage team projects if they were properly trained to use >

[MLO] Re: Apple Watch app isn't working?

2018-10-25 Thread SRhyse
I’m on the beta, and the latest update for us addressed the issues I had on it with my Apple Watch 4, which sound similar to yours. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[MLO] What Should I Do About Resources Library (Bookmarks)

2018-10-23 Thread SRhyse
I used to a long time ago, but I don’t recommend it. MLO’s great for storing many a thing, but it becomes less effective the more you clutter it up with. I keep a complex and dynamic Wiki of things between various apps like Trunk Notes and Notebooks on iOS, both of which are amazing. I use both

[MLO] Best practice for ToDo views and prioritization approach

2018-06-30 Thread SRhyse
Hi there! I’ve used many approaches over the years. The one I used the most was the ‘Active Starred’ view, which acted as a ‘today’ view. Now that MLO has the Forecast view on iOS, however, I have over time come to use that, which is more intuitive and efficient for me. In the latter view, I

[MLO] So when did posts on here start going through a process of being approved by review first?

2018-06-15 Thread SRhyse
There have been various forms of moderation for a long time around here. If you’re worried about them potentially censoring people saying bad things, I wouldn’t. You can read through and find complaints about MLO around here, some of which I’ve replied to in the past. This is a productivity

[MLO] Trying to Get Started

2018-06-08 Thread SRhyse
I recommend diving in. MLO is flexible enough that you can reorganize things as needed without much issue. I’ve regularly made large plans and outlines and structures that I scrapped with a click by dumping it into another folder set to be hidden. Nothing you read about MLO will make as much

[MLO] Re: Help needed planning my Contexts

2018-02-05 Thread SRhyse
As another quick note, you don’t have to always copy and move things after writing them down. I guess it depends on your typing speed, but plenty of times I’ll have something in the inbox and rather than moving it, I’ll just make another task where I want it and delete the original when I get a

[MLO] Re: Help needed planning my Contexts

2018-02-05 Thread SRhyse
Hi John, Those are my basic root folders. Sometimes I’ve had variations where I’d put some of that in a personal folder, or if there’s a big thing going on like building renovations I might make a temporary folder for that, but that’s the gist. BS is by far the biggest folder. My Finance

[MLO] Re: Help needed planning my Contexts

2018-02-02 Thread SRhyse
My D and S contexts take care of the energy aspect. Deep, creative work always requires energy, and my success there would determine whether I felt energized or not. Shallow work usually adds energy because I’m accomplishing things and building up moment with relatively little effort. It’s

[MLO] Help needed planning my Contexts

2018-02-02 Thread SRhyse
What contexts are you using? If they’re too personal to publicly state, you can use a standin name to mention it here, like ‘Wife’ or ‘Dog’ or something. In my experience, fewer contexts work better, and adding more to the mix only serves as a way for me to avoid thinking through my commitments

Re: [MLO] context purity

2018-01-12 Thread SRhyse
I think the petulant negativity more than anything else is what I dislike. I’m self-employed, so I’m probably more aware of the value of a relationship, what goes into it, and that customers/clients can be both valuable or a hostile dependent according to the circumstances. It’s a business

[MLO] context purity

2018-01-11 Thread SRhyse
The original language of GTD is loose enough that ‘context’ is just a distinction you make between different types of tasks to make your lists smaller and easier so you don’t feel overwhelmed, and to put similar things in the same space so you can do one after another if they have similar

[MLO] Re: Newbie question: How well would MLO match my requirements? (list provided)

2018-01-10 Thread SRhyse
Hi John, Seeing as you replied to me, apparently you do not think that. I did read what you wrote, and have read what you’ve written for going on 4 or more years now. The issue for anyone following along seems to be that we do understand your position, but we’re not sure you do. This does not

[MLO] Re: Newbie question: How well would MLO match my requirements? (list provided)

2018-01-09 Thread SRhyse
Hi John, I’m still not seeing where I’ve attacked you. If you take someone asking you if you’ve tried looking at the way you’re using the program as a personal attack worthy of multiple punctuation marks in reply, then maybe public discourse is not for you. I will, however, concede that you

[MLO] Re: Newbie question: How well would MLO match my requirements? (list provided)

2018-01-08 Thread SRhyse
Hi John, I made no personal attack on you, I was addressing the issues you brought forth to the best of your ability to articulate them over what’s now been around a 4 year period. Namely, you saying that it was not possible to use MLO for GTD, and your repeated claims about its inability to

[MLO] Re: Newbie question: How well would MLO match my requirements? (list provided)

2018-01-07 Thread SRhyse
It’s kinda hard to fix a problem that’s user generated. You’re making distinctions that don’t actually exist in GTD. GTD as written is using a series of flat lists that are concrete and distinct when it comes to task management. You group them in whatever way makes it easiest for you to work

[MLO] Re: Newbie question: How well would MLO match my requirements? (list provided)

2017-12-29 Thread SRhyse
I still think you’re fiddling around with things and unsatisfied because you’re unconsciously avoiding doing your work, which I think everyone can relate to. GTD was developed for analog systems to work as a series of flat lists that you regularly review and update. To call anything with a text

[MLO] Re: MLO in online reviews

2017-11-17 Thread SRhyse
I posted this to Andrey in the beta forum, but apps like OmniFocus charge a lot of money and use a good portion of that to market themselves. OmniFocus did and does sponsor a very wide variety of tech related things. There’s a lot of trickle down into people aspiring to be like those they

[MLO] Re: See item in outline

2016-10-05 Thread SRhyse
If you've selected a task in another view, then select 'outline' as a view, it should jump you right there to the task in your outline. On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 12:04:20 AM UTC-7, Tom wrote: > > Is there any way to do this on the iPhone? > -- You received this message because you are

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-05 Thread SRhyse
You could easily make a view that shows 'All' things with 'Don't show in Todo'. It'd take 20 seconds if you were being slow. I tend to look at contexts on my next action by context list. It shows all next actions grouped by context. Pretty sure that's the name of it, but it's a default view.

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-04 Thread SRhyse
or important I slide it up. The biggest bang for the buck on that is having those assigned higher up in the hierarchy, at least for me, which doesn't change often. On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 10:19:53 AM UTC-7, SRhyse wrote: > > I'll see if I can get around to replying to your post some

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-04 Thread SRhyse
I'll see if I can get around to replying to your post some other time, but as a short version: If you hit 'hide in todo' on any task or project, it'll instantly not show in those todo views. If you wanted to make a view called 'Someday Maybe' from there that showed all those tasks with that

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-01 Thread SRhyse
are sequential, however. Let me know if that makes sense. On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 5:03:02 AM UTC-7, John . Smith wrote: > Hi SRhyse > > > > If you're really needing to 'change' that attribute of a  > > task that often, I'm not sure you're doing it right > No, that

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-09-30 Thread SRhyse
I've got 10k+ tasks in MLO and I've never really run into any issues. I've had more in there and I've had less, and it's worked the entire time no matter how many times I got futzy and reorganized things with varying benefits of utility when I was in a mood to avoid doing my work. Based on

[MLO] Re: Chronology in notes

2016-09-28 Thread SRhyse
I recommend putting them in whichever location is the first to pop up on the platform you're using for MLO. New being at the top also lets you preview that bit when viewing the task, making the most relevant portion in the most relevant location. On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 10:08:09 AM

Re: [MLO] Re: The problem that makes us run from app to app

2016-09-23 Thread SRhyse
Wonderful post. The actual thinking process and hard decision making aspect of GTD does deserve special emphasis, as that's what makes it work. You can do that with any app that can hold the results of that thinking and make it easy to find it or present it to you when you've decided you would

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-09-22 Thread SRhyse
I'd thoroughly enjoy being able to create custom task attributes, particulary if MLO could do things like add up the numerical ones on the fly, but saying GTD is unusable in MLO is more than a bit of a stretch on any platform it's presently available on. At base, all you'd need for GTD are

[MLO] Re: GMail and Google Calendar integration

2016-09-19 Thread SRhyse
It integrates in a Forecast view on iOS at present. When there's an update to the Windows version, I'm sure that's going to be considered since it's on the other platforms. I think the priority of this is currently lower because on a PC, you can have MLO open on one side and a Calendar on the

Re: [MLO] Re: Help Getting Started

2016-08-23 Thread SRhyse
hit f3. This creates a new window with a snapshot >> of your view. Go back to the main window and bring up the other view. You >> can tile the two windows next to each other. The snapshot view has limited >> functionality but you can drag tasks back and forth without needing a >

[MLO] Help Getting Started

2016-08-18 Thread SRhyse
Hi Emilio! I'm not sure there's any way to assign specific dates to tasks or groups of tasks other than to select them and then pick them from the calendar/date wheel depending on what platform you're using MLO on. For reference, however, how often are you accurate when it comes to things

[MLO] Re: MLO - so many great things but integration lacking

2015-11-06 Thread SRhyse
In addition to what Dwight said regarding using the 'Task by Email' feature being valuable to use, on the Windows app, you can set up a hot key to have an input box float above whatever apps you're using to put things in, either en mass to be parsed into a hierarchy, or individually with the

[MLO] Re: MLO end of life?

2015-07-24 Thread SRhyse
I'd certainly enjoy some of these features as well, but as a beta tester, I can tell you the apps themselves that comprise the MLO family certainly aren't dying or languishing in any capacity. On the iOS front, I honestly think the biggest holdup for new releases to users has largely been from

[MLO] Re: Anyone here read this book Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less ? (by Greg McKeown)

2015-03-28 Thread SRhyse
, March 11, 2015 at 4:09:16 PM UTC-7, SRhyse wrote: I actually just got done reading this one today! You'd be hard pressed to find many who would disagree that most of the things we do aren't massively impactful, but the author massively underplays the actual difficulty of know which things

[MLO] Anyone here read this book Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less ? (by Greg McKeown)

2015-03-11 Thread SRhyse
I actually just got done reading this one today! You'd be hard pressed to find many who would disagree that most of the things we do aren't massively impactful, but the author massively underplays the actual difficulty of know which things are going to be better to do than others in the

[MLO] MLO or Omnifocus?

2013-12-16 Thread SRhyse
Omnifocus isn't a bad app, but it's very rigidly locked into one way of viewing and handling things that in my experience doesn't fully allow it to rise beyond the level of slightly nifty list manager. It's very well integrated and extended inside of OS X, but the number of people that take

[MLO] Keeping tasks as notes in MLO is a misuse of this task organiser. Discuss.

2013-08-23 Thread SRhyse
I've wanted similar functionality in MLO before as well, acting similar to folders, only perhaps with a different icon or simply the removal of the checkbox from a task. That would work well with the outline view of MLO to me. I also agree similar 'functionality' can be enabled by using, say,

[MLO] auto task data parsing from email body forwards

2013-05-14 Thread SRhyse
Not presently, but attribute parsing for the tasks-via-email feature is planned! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MyLifeOrganized group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[MLO] Why is the hierarchical structure Iphone not the seem as android

2013-05-12 Thread SRhyse
Presently, it's not the same. But iOS development has recently been amped up, and the iPhone client is the first to see a refresh. Presenting an outline view more akin to those found on the other clients topped the list even before the super-team was put together, so I think you'll be happy

[MLO] Re: On iPhone app, adding task to gmail calendar

2013-01-27 Thread SRhyse
To my knowledge, on the iPhone and iPad versions of MLO, there's no integration with Google Calendar or Google Tasks, if that's what you're referring to. You can do that on the Android version? That's pretty nifty! On Friday, January 25, 2013 7:05:58 PM UTC-8, Debbie Hopper wrote: How can I

[MLO] Re: Organizing Tasks in MLO for iPhone

2013-01-07 Thread SRhyse
of possible parents in the Task Details, nor does it in the Bookmarks view. I tried this with non-project and project tasks, but to no avail. Are there any special requirements on when a task can be bookmarked, or did I do it wrong? Am Montag, 7. Januar 2013 01:53:28 UTC+1 schrieb SRhyse: I

[MLO] Re: Organizing Tasks in MLO for iPhone

2013-01-06 Thread SRhyse
I think there's been a misunderstanding based on the iPhone menus. An item only needs to be a child of the 'Inbox' folder to be considered in the inbox. To move the icon, from it's menu, you can select a different bookmarked task or existing project. But, you can also from any list hit the

[MLO] Re: MLO on Mac (Linux, et al)

2012-12-10 Thread SRhyse
Total number of OS installs or purchases, even device installs and purchases, isn't the best metric to measure market viability with in regards to MLO. As stated I believe elsewhere, many Windows installs are on closed networks that end users aren't in a position to have their own personal

[MLO] Re: Feature Request: Recurrence to work for tasks without a Due Date

2012-09-26 Thread SRhyse
I'd like this too. +1! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MyLifeOrganized group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/jLgjDatEwiEJ. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [MLO] Pay MLO again, and again, oops, one more time.

2012-08-29 Thread SRhyse
Same here. I'm on the betas, and things go well there, but I feel like they're doing themselves an injustice in not bolstering their development resources. Active development itself can sell apps in the current marketplace. Developing multiple clients in a cross platform ecosystem isn't easy

Re: [MLO] Pay MLO again, and again, oops, one more time.

2012-08-22 Thread SRhyse
Though I always love paying less, that's actually just the standard for apps of this caliber in the App Store, of which MLO is actually on the lower end price-wise. OmniFocus used to run much more for the Desktop, iPhone and iPad Apps (~$80, $20 and $40 respectively, until the iPad app was

[MLO] Re: HELP any tutorials for the program ... in ENGLISH???

2012-07-27 Thread SRhyse
The help file actually is pretty good and thorough. The best way to learn is to read up a tad, intermixed with playing with the application. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MyLifeOrganized group. To view this discussion on the web visit

[MLO] do you DO text-related task inside of MLO ?

2012-07-03 Thread SRhyse
I've played around quite a bit in both directions. (Keep in mind, for my current workflow, I'm mostly iOS based now. I still love the Windows app, but I'm on the go more and more, and have taken to doing everything I can on my iPhone and iPad) Some of my tasks involve alot of large scale

[MLO] Anyone have any experience using MLO for more than just tasks? Like a full text based reference system?

2012-03-28 Thread SRhyse
I've currently got most all of my reference information in applications like Evernote, Dropbox, and things that interface with them. Over time, however, Evernote's slowed down and become too buggy for me to use at the moment on the iOS applications, and many of the non file things I use

[MLO] Re: When will we start to see some design and not just marketing upgrades to MLO?

2011-09-20 Thread SRhyse
I'm not sure how many people are working on all these apps, though my current understanding is that it's not very many besides Andrey. Whether or not you're for continued development on either the desktop or mobile fronts, the pace of development is likely so slow all around because the

[MLO] Re: Managing a task deluge/what happened to the calendar?

2011-09-05 Thread SRhyse
Though I'd kill for a calendar function in this thing as well, it sounds like whatever structure you're trying to put your tasks into in the outline is detrimentally complex for the volume you're inputting, as well as the way you work. The RTE and parsing mentioned can certainly speed that up, as

[MLO] Re: How do you cope with absence of password protection in MLO?

2011-09-03 Thread SRhyse
I cope with it by not being concerned. If someone has gotten access to my computer in general, then I've got bigger problems than a specific program detailing how I plan to walk to dog and type up a storm. On Sep 1, 11:31 pm, br...@yahoo.com br...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, Are you concerned

[MLO] Re: wanna buy

2011-07-11 Thread SRhyse
I had a similar problem, and after contacting the program author, reset the activation key you get when you buy the program and it fixed it right up. He also said that if you're using a pirated version, that's a common problem in those copies. So if you're using a pirated version to test the

[MLO] Adding notes to tasks in the rapid task entry parsing language when multiple task entry is on?

2011-04-14 Thread SRhyse
If you can't currently do this then consider it a suggestion- I really like the rapid task entry dialog box, and the ability to have things like context and due date parsed out of it even more so. I like being able to enter in more than one task in at once, but sometimes I need to add notes to