Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-10-01 Thread Julien Vey
+1 2014-10-01 0:20 GMT+02:00 Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com: +1 On 01/10/2014 3:08 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Solum Core Reviewer Team, I propose the following change to our core reviewer group: -lifeless (Robert Collins) [inactive] +murali-allada (Murali

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-10-01 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com writes: Solum Core Reviewer Team, I propose the following change to our core reviewer group: -lifeless (Robert Collins) [inactive] +murali-allada (Murali Allada) +james-li (James Li) Please let me know your votes (+1, 0, or -1). +1 Regards, Noorul

Re: [openstack-dev] 2 Minute tokens

2014-10-01 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: 1. Identify the roles for the APIs that Cinder is going to be calling on swift based on Swifts policy.json FYI: there is no Swifts policy.json in mainline code, there is one external middleware available that provides it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-10-01 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 09/30/2014 02:03 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: 2014-09-12 1:05 GMT+02:00 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com: If Nova was to take Soren's advice and implement its data-access layer on top of Cassandra or Riak, we would just end up re-inventing SQL Joins in Python-land. I may very well be wrong(!), but

[openstack-dev] [all] minimum python support version for juno

2014-10-01 Thread Osanai, Hisashi
Hi, I would like to know the minimum python support version for juno. I checked the following memo. My understanding is python 2.6 support will be supported in juno and also dropped before kilo so it will be dropped in one of stable releases in juno. Is this correct understanding?

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi Joe, On 01/10/14 09:10, joehuang wrote: OpenStack cascading: to integrate multi-site / multi-vendor OpenStack instances into one cloud with OpenStack API exposed. Cells: a single OpenStack instance scale up methodology Just to let you know - there are actually some users out there that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Glance on swift problem

2014-10-01 Thread Sławek Kapłoński
Hello, W dniu 2014-09-30 20:28, Timur Nurlygayanov napisał(a): Hi Slawek, we faced the same error and this is issue with Swift. We can see 100% disk usage on the Swift node during the file upload and looks like Swift can't send info about status of the file loading in time. On our

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Sahara] Juno RC1 available

2014-10-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hello everyone, Nova, Cinder, and Sahara just published their first release candidate for the upcoming 2014.2 (Juno) release. The RC1 tarballs are available for download at: https://launchpad.net/nova/juno/juno-rc1 https://launchpad.net/cinder/juno/juno-rc1

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread loy wolfe
Hi Joe and Cellers, I've tried to understand relationship between Cell and Cascading. If Cell has been designed as below, would it be the same as Cascading? 1) Besides Nova, Neutron/Ceilometer.. is also hierarchically structured for scalability. 2) Child-parent interaction is based on REST

Re: [openstack-dev] 2 Minute tokens

2014-10-01 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:44:51AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: What is keeping us from dropping the (scoped) token duration to 5 minutes? If we could keep their lifetime as short as network skew lets us, we would be able to: Get rid of revocation checking. Get rid of persisted tokens.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-10-01 Thread Pierre Padrixe
+1 2014-10-01 8:50 GMT+02:00 Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com: Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com writes: Solum Core Reviewer Team, I propose the following change to our core reviewer group: -lifeless (Robert Collins) [inactive] +murali-allada (Murali Allada) +james-li

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread joehuang
Hello, Tom, Thanks for your mail to mention that some users out there that use cells to integrate multi-site / multi-vendor OpenStack instances into one cloud with OpenStack API exposed.,. Why do I think Cells using scale up methodology? 1, Use case 1: All cells using shared Cinder, Neutron,

[openstack-dev] Weekly Octavia meeting (2014-10-01)

2014-10-01 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi Folks! Since I had to miss last week's meeting due to a last minute emergency, and since it seems there was significant confusion over some of the items I had added to last week's agenda, this week's agenda will actually be essentially the same thing as last week's. Here's what we've got on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Requirements freeze exception for testscenarios, oslotest, psycopg2, MySQL-python

2014-10-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Also, depfreeze seems to apply to openstack/requirements repository only [1], and projects are open to consume new dependencies from there. [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/DepFreeze Yes, you're right. Nothing prevents this patch from merging at this point. --

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread joehuang
Hello, Loy, Thank you very much. You have already grasped the core design idea for OpenStack cascading: By my understanding, core idea of Cascading is that each resource building block(like child cell) is a clearly separated autonomous system, with the already defined REST OS-API as the NB

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] minimum python support version for juno

2014-10-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/10/14 09:08, Osanai, Hisashi wrote: Hi, I would like to know the minimum python support version for juno. I checked the following memo. My understanding is python 2.6 support will be supported in juno and also dropped before kilo so it

[openstack-dev] [NFV] VLAN trunking to VM - justification/use cases

2014-10-01 Thread Calum Loudon
Hello all I took the action on last week's call to explain why the VLAN trunking to VM bp is a relevant use case for NFV - here's my take. The big picture is that this is about how service providers can use virtualisation to provide differentiated network services to their customers (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [IPv6] New API format for extra_dhcp_opts

2014-10-01 Thread Xu Han Peng
ip_version sounds great. Currently the opt-names are written into the configuration file of dnsmasq directly. So I would say yes, they are coming from dnsmasq definitions. It will make more sense when ip_version is missing or null, the option apply to both since we could have only ipv6 or

[openstack-dev] Taskflow for Juno RC1 effectively require Kombu 3.x

2014-10-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, When building the latest release (eg: Juno RC1) of Taskflow 0.4, needed by Cinder, I've notice failures due to the impossibility to do: from kombu import message More in details, the failure is: == FAIL:

Re: [openstack-dev] VPNaaS site to site connection down.

2014-10-01 Thread Paul Michali (pcm)
See in-line @PCM PCM (Paul Michali) MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com) TW ………... @pmichali GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83 Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83 On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:31 PM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul,

Re: [openstack-dev] Taskflow for Juno RC1 effectively require Kombu 3.x

2014-10-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/10/14 12:55, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, When building the latest release (eg: Juno RC1) of Taskflow 0.4, needed by Cinder, I've notice failures due to the impossibility to do: from kombu import message More in details, the failure

[openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Release report

2014-10-01 Thread Ladislav Smola
1. os-apply-config: release: 0.1.22 -- 0.1.23 --https://pypi.python.org/pypi/os-apply-config/0.1.23 -- http://tarballs.openstack.org/os-apply-config/os-apply-config-0.1.23.tar.gz 2. os-refresh-config: release: 0.1.7 -- 0.1.8

Re: [openstack-dev] VPNaaS site to site connection down.

2014-10-01 Thread masoom alam
In line. Thanks for the response. @PCM So is the public IP for the router (172.24.4.226) an internet on the Internet? In the example, IIRC, the quantum router has an IP on the public network, and the GW IP is also on the same network (172.24.4.225). I think the latter, is assigned to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread joehuang
Hello, Alex, Thank you very much for your mail about remote cluster hypervisor. One of the inspiration for OpenStack cascading is from the remote clustered hypervisor like vCenter. The difference between the remote clustered hypervisor and OpenStack cascading is that not only Nova involved in

Re: [openstack-dev] Taskflow for Juno RC1 effectively require Kombu 3.x

2014-10-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
There just needs to be a fallback import. In v2.5.0 the Message class (which is the only item used from kombu.message) was in kombu.transport.base. Thomas, can you confirm that something like try: from kombu import message except ImportError: from kombu.transport import base as message

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] concrete proposal on changing the library testing model with devstack-gate

2014-10-01 Thread Sean Dague
An initial WIP patch to show the direction I think this could materialize - https://review.openstack.org/125346 Early feedback appreciated so I can do this conversion across the board. My assumption is that all non integrated release projects should be converted to this model. On 09/26/2014

Re: [openstack-dev] 2 Minute tokens

2014-10-01 Thread Adam Young
On 10/01/2014 04:14 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:44:51AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: What is keeping us from dropping the (scoped) token duration to 5 minutes? If we could keep their lifetime as short as network skew lets us, we would be able to: Get rid of revocation

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] minimum python support version for juno

2014-10-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/1/2014 4:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/10/14 09:08, Osanai, Hisashi wrote: Hi, I would like to know the minimum python support version for juno. I checked the following memo. My understanding is python 2.6 support will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-qa] Post job failures

2014-10-01 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi Josh, Just a heads up that you shouldn't use this list for any discussion. We've moved all of the discussion off this list into openstack-dev. The only reason we haven't removed the openstack-qa list is so we have a separate address for the periodic job results. (which honestly hasn't been the

Re: [openstack-dev] VPNaaS site to site connection down.

2014-10-01 Thread Paul Michali (pcm)
See inline at #PCM PCM (Paul Michali) MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com) TW ………... @pmichali GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83 Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83 On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:35 AM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote: In line.

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday October 2nd at 22:00 UTC

2014-10-01 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi everyone, Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be tomorrow Thursday, October 2nd at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting Anyone is welcome to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla Blueprints

2014-10-01 Thread Steven Dake
On 09/30/2014 09:55 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com mailto:sd...@redhat.com wrote: I've done a first round of prioritization. I think key things we need people to step up for are nova and rabbitmq containers. For the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Create an instance with a custom uuid

2014-10-01 Thread Pasquale Porreca
Thank you for the answers. I understood the concerns about having the UUID completely user defined and I also understand Nova has no interest in supporting a customized algorithm to generate UUID. Anyway I may have found a solution that will cover my use case and respect the standard for UUID

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] [All?] Status vs State

2014-10-01 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi, # The first half is related to Horizon and the latter half is about the wording in Nova and Neutron API. During Horizon translation for Juno, I noticed the words State and Status in multiple contexts. Sometimes they are in very similar contexts and sometimes they have different contexts. I

[openstack-dev] [All] [I18N] compiling translation message catalogs

2014-10-01 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi, To display localized strings, we need to compile translated message catalogs (PO files) into compiled one (MO files). I would like to discuss and get a consensus who and when generate compiled message catalogs. Inputs from packagers are really appreciated. [The current status] * Horizon

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Create an instance with a custom uuid

2014-10-01 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: (response inline) - Original Message - From: Pasquale Porreca pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:08:50 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] Taskflow for Juno RC1 effectively require Kombu 3.x

2014-10-01 Thread Joshua Harlow
I tried this out, seems to work locally. So you should be fine doing this locally if u want or when a taskflow 0.4.1 comes out (which it can/should soon anyway) this will be there. Review up @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125400/ Bug @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/taskflow/+bug/1376330

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Juno RC1 is Available

2014-10-01 Thread Serg Melikyan
We successfully released RC1 release of Murano! The RC1 tarballs are available for download at: https://launchpad.net/murano/juno/juno-rc1 Unless critical issues are found, this RC1 will be formally released as the 2014.2 final version of Murano. Please, try to do extensive testing of this

Re: [openstack-dev] Taskflow for Juno RC1 effectively require Kombu 3.x

2014-10-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-10-01 16:04:37 -0007 (-0007), Joshua Harlow wrote: Thanks for finding this one (it'd be nice for some gate job to run in 'strict' requirements mode which tests the lower bounds of the requirements repo somehow, since with things like kombu=2.5.0 this will always pull in the newest and

[openstack-dev] [all] icehouse failure rates are somewhat catastrophic - who is actually maintaining it?

2014-10-01 Thread Sean Dague
As stable branches got discussed recently, I'm kind of curious who is actually stepping up to make icehouse able to pass tests in any real way. Because right now I've been trying to fix devstack icehouse so that icehouse requirements can be unblocked (and to land code that will reduce grenade

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Hi Chaoyi, Thanks for sharing these information. Sometime back I have stared a project called “Alliance” which trying to address the same concerns (see the link below). Alliance service is designed to provide Inter-Cloud Resource Federation which will enable resource sharing across cloud in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-qa] Post job failures

2014-10-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-10-01 10:39:40 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote: [...] So I actually think as a first pass this would be the best way to handle it. You can leave comments on a closed gerrit changes, [...] Not so easy as it sounds. Jobs in post are running on an arbitrary Git commit (more often

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] icehouse failure rates are somewhat catastrophic - who is actually maintaining it?

2014-10-01 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: As stable branches got discussed recently, I'm kind of curious who is actually stepping up to make icehouse able to pass tests in any real way. Because right now I've been trying to fix devstack icehouse so that icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla Blueprints

2014-10-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2014-10-01 08:04:38 -0700: On 09/30/2014 09:55 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com mailto:sd...@redhat.com wrote: I've done a first round of prioritization. I think key things we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-10-01 Thread Ravi Penta
+1 - Original Message - From: Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:03:16 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change Solum Core Reviewer

Re: [openstack-dev] django-pyscss failing with Django 1.7

2014-10-01 Thread Douglas Fish
Hi Thomas, I have a few suggestions inline that I hope will be helpful! From: Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS, Justin Pomeroy/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS Date: 09/30/2014 10:26 PM Subject: Fwd: Re: [openstack-dev] django-pyscss failing with Django 1.7

[openstack-dev] oslo.db 1.0.2 released

2014-10-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
The Oslo team has released version 1.0.2 of oslo.db. This patch release on the Juno series includes a fix for bug 1374497 (“change in oslo.db ‘ping’ handling is causing issues in projects that are not using transactions”). https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1374497 Doug

[openstack-dev] Help with EC2 Driver functionality using boto ...

2014-10-01 Thread Aparna S Parikh
Hi, We are currently working on writing a driver for Amazon's EC2 using the boto libraries, and are hung up on creating a snapshot of an instance. The instance remains in 'Queued' status on Openstack instead of becoming 'Active'. The actual EC2 snapshot that gets created is in 'available'

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [All?] Status vs State

2014-10-01 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Akihiro! IMO, this is precisely where having an API standards working group can help to make the user experience of our public APIs less frustrating. Such a working group should have the ability to vet terms like state vs status and ensure consistency across the public APIs. More

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Documentation process

2014-10-01 Thread Anne Gentle
Sorry I'm so late to the party. Yes, Andreas is right, we simply cannot take on any more DocImpact in openstack-manuals, but it would be great to change the infrastructure to log against a more exact match for the bug tracker for the project with the impacted docs. Looks like you're doing so with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-10-01 Thread Roshan Agrawal
Murali, James, congratulations on core reviewer status ! -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 1:11 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer

[openstack-dev] [nova] formally distinguish server desired state from actual state?

2014-10-01 Thread Chris Friesen
Currently in nova we have the vm_state, which according to the code comments is supposed to represent a VM's current stable (not transition) state, or what the customer expect the VM to be. However, we then added in an ERROR state. How does this possibly make sense given the above

[openstack-dev] [Sahara][Doc] Overview and Architecture images in docs

2014-10-01 Thread Sharan Kumar M
Hi all, There was a discussion previously stating that the Sahara overview image http://docs.openstack.org/developer/sahara/overview.html and the architecture image http://docs.openstack.org/developer/sahara/architecture.html pretty much convey the same message. So will it be nice to strip off

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Glance on swift problem

2014-10-01 Thread Sławek Kapłoński
Hello, Thanks for Your help but it not helps. I checked that for sure on each swift node there is a lot of free space. What can confirm that is fact that when I try to create image with size about 1.7GB and I have swift_store_large_object_size set to 1GB than there is error (always after send

[openstack-dev] [nova] Help with EC2 Driver functionality using boto ...

2014-10-01 Thread Aparna S Parikh
Hi, We are trying to leverage EC2 from Openstack, and are currently working on writing an EC2 driver using the boto libraries, and are hung up on snapshot of an instance functionality. The instance remains in 'Queued' status on Openstack instead of becoming 'Active'. The actual EC2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-10-01 Thread Ed Cranford
Happy Corethday to the both of you! On 10/1/14, 1:10 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks everyone for your feedback on this. The adjustments have been made. Regards, Adrian On Sep 30, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Solum Core Reviewer

[openstack-dev] [all] [announce] OpenStack Bootstrapping Hour Episode 1: Diving into OpenStack Docs - Friday Oct 3 - 19:00 UTC (15:00 Americas/New_York)

2014-10-01 Thread Sean Dague
Anne Gentle will be our guest this week as we dive into OpenStack Docs. That dirty word everyone loves but hardly anyone does, documentation! For this bootstrapping hour Anne will talk about the wild world of developer docs, both for contributors and application developers. We can do a review and

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Sideways grenade job to test Nova Network to Neutron migration

2014-10-01 Thread Clark Boylan
Hello, One of the requirements placed on Ironic was that they must have a path from Nova Baremetal to Ironic and that path should be tested. This resulted in a sideways grenade job which instead of going from one release of OpenStack to another, swaps out components within a release. In this case

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] formally distinguish server desired state from actual state?

2014-10-01 Thread Chris Friesen
On 10/01/2014 01:23 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/01/2014 03:07 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: Currently in nova we have the vm_state, which according to the code comments is supposed to represent a VM's current stable (not transition) state, or what the customer expect the VM to be. However, we then

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] icehouse failure rates are somewhat catastrophic - who is actually maintaining it?

2014-10-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 10/1/14, 11:53 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: As stable branches got discussed recently, I'm kind of curious who is actually stepping up to make icehouse able to pass tests in any real way. Because right

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla Blueprints

2014-10-01 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Has anyone figured out a way of having a floating ip like feature with docker so that you can have rabbitmq, mysql, or ceph mon's at fixed ip's and be able to migrate them around from physical host to physical host and still have them at fixed locations that you can easily put in static config

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-puppet-elements is alive!

2014-10-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
{Puppet-OpenStack,TripleO} developpers, For your information https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-puppet-elements is now alive. Puppet Group has been assigned core on this project since most of contribution will be Puppet code. Good news! Dan Prince is both TripleO Puppet core member, so he will

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] icehouse failure rates are somewhat catastrophic - who is actually maintaining it?

2014-10-01 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/01/2014 04:46 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On 10/1/14, 11:53 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: As stable branches got discussed recently, I'm kind of curious who is actually stepping up to make icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] formally distinguish server desired state from actual state?

2014-10-01 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: Currently in nova we have the vm_state, which according to the code comments is supposed to represent a VM's current stable (not transition) state, or what the customer expect the VM to be. However, we then added in an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cross-project-work] What about adding cross-project-spec repo?

2014-10-01 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Sep 29, 2014, at 5:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Boris Pavlovic wrote: it goes without saying that working on cross-project stuff in OpenStack is quite hard task. Because it's always

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-01 Thread joehuang
Hi, Tiwari, Great to know you are also trying to address similar issues. For sure we are happy to work out a common solution for these issues. I just go through the wiki page, the question for me is will the Alliance provide/retain current north bound OpenStack API ?. It's very important

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] formally distinguish server desired state from actual state?

2014-10-01 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/01/2014 04:31 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 10/01/2014 01:23 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/01/2014 03:07 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: Currently in nova we have the vm_state, which according to the code comments is supposed to represent a VM's current stable (not transition) state, or what the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] minimum python support version for juno

2014-10-01 Thread Osanai, Hisashi
Thank you for the quick responses. On 10/1/2014 4:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: All stable Juno releases will support Python 2.6. All Kilo releases are expected to drop Python 2.6 support. On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 11:28 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Right, and backports could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] icehouse failure rates are somewhat catastrophic - who is actually maintaining it?

2014-10-01 Thread Michael Still
I agree with Sean here. The original idea was that these stable branches would be maintained by the distros, and that is clearly not happening if you look at the code review latency there. We need to sort that out before we even consider supporting a release for more than the one year we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Sideways grenade job to test Nova Network to Neutron migration

2014-10-01 Thread Michael Still
Thanks for doing this. My recollection is that we still need some features landed in Neutron before this work can complete, but its possible I am confused. A public status update on that from the Neutron team would be good. Michael On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Clark Boylan

Re: [openstack-dev] Help with EC2 Driver functionality using boto ...

2014-10-01 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
It is hard to tell if this is a bug or a misconfiguration from your desctiption. The failure likely generated some kind of error message in nova or glance. If you can track down an error message and a tracback it would be worth submitting as a bug report to the appropriate project. Vish On

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla Blueprints

2014-10-01 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Oct 1, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: Has anyone figured out a way of having a floating ip like feature with docker so that you can have rabbitmq, mysql, or ceph mon's at fixed ip's and be able to migrate them around from physical host to physical host and still

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] a need to assert user ownership in preserved state

2014-10-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Recently we've been testing image based updates using TripleO, and we've run into an interesting conundrum. Currently, our image build scripts create a user per service for the image. We don't, at this time, assert a UID, so it could get any UID in the /etc/passwd database of the image. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla Blueprints

2014-10-01 Thread Angus Lees
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:05:23 PM Fox, Kevin M wrote: Has anyone figured out a way of having a floating ip like feature with docker so that you can have rabbitmq, mysql, or ceph mon's at fixed ip's and be able to migrate them around from physical host to physical host and still have them at fixed

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a need to assert user ownership in preserved state

2014-10-01 Thread Gregory Haynes
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2014-10-02 01:50:33 +: Recently we've been testing image based updates using TripleO, and we've run into an interesting conundrum. Currently, our image build scripts create a user per service for the image. We don't, at this time, assert a UID, so

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][TripleO] Last days to elect your PTL!

2014-10-01 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
Hello Cinder and TripleO contributors, Just a quick reminder that elections are closing soon, if you haven't already you should use your right to vote and pick your favourite candidate! Thanks for your time! Tristan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a need to assert user ownership in preserved state

2014-10-01 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 10/01/2014 09:50:33 PM: Recently we've been testing image based updates using TripleO, and we've run into an interesting conundrum. Currently, our image build scripts create a user per service for the image. We don't, at this time, assert a UID, so it

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a need to assert user ownership in preserved state

2014-10-01 Thread Steve Kowalik
On 02/10/14 12:26, Mike Spreitzer wrote: I do not understand the problem statement. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with image based updates using TripleO. What is updating what? If the UIDs are not asserted, what UIDs shift by one? Is this because some files keep owner UID while the some

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [IPv6] [ironic] New API format for extra_dhcp_opts

2014-10-01 Thread Carlino, Chuck
As a 'heads up', adding ironic to the thread since they are a 'key' consumer of this api. On Oct 1, 2014, at 3:15 AM, Xu Han Peng pengxu...@gmail.commailto:pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: ip_version sounds great. Currently the opt-names are written into the configuration file of dnsmasq

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a need to assert user ownership in preserved state

2014-10-01 Thread James Polley
All three of the options presented here seem to assume that UIDs will always be allocated at image-build time. I think that's because most of these UIDs will be used to write files into the chroot at image-create time - if I could think of some way around that, I think we could avoid this