In a message dated 1/21/01 11:21:58 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Guess that makes 27 manufacturers of K-mount lenses.
It also proves, if there ever was a doubt, that the PENTAX "K" mount is the
most popular (and copied) lens mount ever.
*Which also indicates there are
There are likely as many different sites for a Pentax love-fest as there are members
of the list.
Utah sounds great
Buffalo Pound Lake sounds great
Grandfather Mountain sounds great
My suggestion is good 'ole Atlantic City, NJ...
before you fall off your seats...
Great architecture (if not
In a message dated 1/21/01 11:22:23 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only way to reach 22 or 25 or any such large number is to count
rebadged cameras or those that have made K mount lenses but no bodies.
The original list of 22 (now 27) manufacturers *was* confined
Thanks for the reply Len.
Francis
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
Well, I guess for 20 odd years then the prints have just been developing a bit
more in the fix. I use rapid fix, tho, and that's pretty strong so I think
it
stops
quickly enough. Never refresh chemicals, always start new.
Annsan,
You've been stopping your prints with water. No harm
In a message dated 1/21/01 11:55:17 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll third that!
Welcome aboard Mark!
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
On 22 Jan 2001, at 5:05, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It was asked:
For information purposes only: does anyone, other then we macro shooters,
accustomed as we are to crawling on the ground in search of tiny flowers or
even smaller insect-type critters, ever shoot from a tripod *without*
Or my Canonet...
Norm
From: Shel Belinkoff
Mike Johnston wrote:
--would have a line where showing where the image is 100%.
Sort of like the Leica framelines.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Tiger Moses (and Mike, too) wrote:
I have always heard the SP500 had a click past 500 onthe dial and it was 1/1000,
it was easier to label as a lesser camera to make it cheaper, than to
actually make
a crippled shutter...can you verify?
I keep hearing this...and I keep forgetting to
Bruce Dayton wrote:
The only thing I've seen with my 870 is when I print on non-epson paper.
The recent Ilford matte is especially bad (too bad, I really like the
finish). What I have seen is a bronze looking color shift on really dark
brown/black areas. I have had the best luck with
Chris Niesmertelny wrote:
And, of course, gambling.
I'm so THERE! Where and when?
Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
In a message dated 1/22/01 1:27:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://arnhem.telekabel.nl/~pjonkman/index2.html
... the UnOfficial Spotmatic Pages
Thanks Bill!
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
That was actually pretty funny
Norm
From: Bill Owens
Someone had to forward this sooner or later. Check out the ugliest
Spotmatic in the world
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1207364130
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
So which of us won
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Baugher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Spotmatic auction for a good laugh
That was actually pretty funny
Norm
From: Bill Owens
Someone had to forward
Did someone say "Las Vegas"? I`ll go for that!!! My wife`s idea of camping
is when room service is 10 minutes late.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Baugher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 5:33 AM
Subject:
Shel wrote:
It was asked:
...Ever shoot from a tripod *without* extending its legs?
Certainly. I try to use the least leg extension possible when
using a tripod, and it's not unusual for me to use no extension
at all. Sometimes I want a different perspective, other times
it's because I
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:14:03 EST, you wrote:
In a message dated 1/22/01 1:30:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I just wanted to remark the fact that a working, if not nice, cable
release can be self constructed with no more the 3$ expense, an hour
time and a little
Fact - Not fiction:
Weekend before last I taught my future wife photography, and started her out
with a SF-10 and Pentax 28-200 and a $24 Velbon SGB-3 tripod (the tripod was
found at Salvation Army Store!). She used 100 Speed film that day. We
visited an old spanish mission and did many
"Peifer, William [OCDUS]" wrote:
I had a short telescope (er, long-focus telephoto lens)
on my cheapy Velbon tripod one night, taking shots of the crescent Moon. No
leg extension, and *definitely* no center post extension. My neighbor was
taken aback when he saw my apparently lifeless body
Yes, there were some problems with the initial batch of 1270 inks. That
problem, much like the problems with colour print materials from the mid
'70s, has apparently been licked.
Do you have a source for this? AFAIK, the problem (glossy prints
fading to orange) is still there. Epson was
Hey Bob W., thanks for posting the link to the
reportage.org site. I checked out the catacombs piece last week. Since them I've
been having reoccurring nightmares about working in one...G
Norm
I should have clarified that I'm a no-mailer, so I read the messages in
my browser - Netscape 4.7.
And, yes, sometimes I'm a no-brainer, too.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Hi,
dosk wrote:
[...]
Pretty hefty? You better believe it. I really do not want to walk around,
say, NYC, all day with a 30" long 12-15 lb weight on my shoulder. (Might as
well be in the military again!)
Which is why I'm now considering several (relatively inexpensive) tripods
that extend
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
[about the Epson 1270 orange shift]
This comes from the sometimes-friendly people at Epson Canada.
Interesting. From what I hear, Epson never completely acknowledged the
problem explicitly. Even when I called for my refund they used plently
of
I'd sign up in a heartbeat. I bet I could learn loads from the likes of you
guys/gals
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
On the Ebay subject, how does one get the COMPLETE listings, when searching?
It seems that some cookie is set that normally restrict the items displayed to either
the US site, UK site or the German site. Any way around that?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "William Kane" [EMAIL
Hi Bill,
(German is not my mother tongue so I may have missed something.) Roughly it translates:
Exakta zoom with the unbelievable range of 650-1300mm! at aperture 8-16.
Because of the T2 mount system the lens can be attached to 19 different camera systems
by the appropraite T2 adapter.
The
I would think that the M42 screw mount was the most popular SLR
lens mount of all time. There must have been at least a hundred
companies that made lenses in the Praktika screw mount (of which
Pentax is just one).
For modern lenses you may be right.
--Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a
Hi all,
Thanks to all who responded to my original post on lag times between
"pressing the button" and exposing the film. Those two web sites were quite
useful and interesting, and I was especially impressed with the high-speed
imaging experiments of the young students.
I was surprised to find
In a message dated 1/22/01 11:26:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
---Who here use's a monopod? And why on earth why?
(But I would change the subject title here to "Monopods?", before it gets to
unwieldy...)
Skip
I do Skip, all the time. It goes where I go. Spin that
"Juan J. Buhler" wrote re: PiezographyBW:
I'm getting results I could never get with my limited darkroom
experience, without the mess or the fumes.
How is it, cost-wise, in the real world? I was looking at converting
one of my old printers to it. Yeah, the Epson system is not at all
For those that are interested, I have today spoken to Pentax UK regarding
the expected availability of the new 24-90 zoom in the UK.
I was told that they do not yet have any idea of either the
release date or
expected price, and that they don't expect anything to be confirmed until
I'm sorry that this is a stupid question, but where are these pins? I don't
see them on my ZX-50.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Meleshuk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: Cable release; was Tripods, cable...
|
Hi
Amazing. Who did that?
BR
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]P; vegne af Frank Knapik
Sendt: 22. januar 2001 22:07
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Pz-1p Panorama Mode
Hello. I took some pictures with the panorama mode on and when the photos
In a message dated 1/22/01 7:34:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's an unused plastic tarp in my garage, and just the other day I was
thinking that I had no use for it.
Take along a lightweight blanket Shel. That tarp will get cool to the touch
and miserable late
I think you made a good choice. The 50 mm with the 2x will be a lot
smaller than the 100/2.8 Macro is. Now if you want Macro, you can't beat
the 100/2.8.
David Viles
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dosk
Sent: Thursday, January
I am going to try this one more time. I hope to get a reply this time. At
least I think I am doing this right. I see the message on my e-mail list,
oh well. I'm still waiting for some advise either way.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Dillard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tom wrote:
Bob's right of course. I have 2 tripods,
and will probably get a 3rd sooner or later.
Ya know, I was thinking that I have but two 'pods, but upon
reading your message I thought about it for for a bit and
realized that I have five. There's the Bogen/Manfrotto 3228W,
the
Did someone say "Las Vegas"? I`ll go for that!!! My wife`s idea of camping
is when room service is 10 minutes late.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Sounds like her idea of "roughing it" would be flying coach and staying at a
Holiday Inn?
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/22/01 11:26:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
---Who here use's a monopod? And why on earth why?
(But I would change the subject title here to "Monopods?", before it gets to
unwieldy...)
Skip
I do Skip, all the
Rite aide does mine.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Hi
Amazing. Who did that?
BR
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]P; vegne af Frank Knapik
Sendt: 22. januar 2001 22:07
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Pz-1p Panorama Mode
Hello. I took some
the one hour processors I do business with are doing this regularly now. IT is
something to remember
if you get caught without a telephoto lense strong enough for the job. --- Kick the
camera to
the Pan mode --- and the drug store will blow up your negative 2.5 times as much, and
then take
- Original Message -
From: "David A. Mann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: Who is Currently Compiling the Pentax Lens List?
William Robb writes:
He is on vacation, but he is doing the body count.
That sounds like a
Exakta zoom with the unbelievable focal length range from 650-1300mm
with luminous intensity 8,0-16,0. The objective with the respective
T2-Adapter can be attached by the T2-Anschlusssystem to 19 different camera
systems. The adapter for Pentax bayonet is contained in the price. Further
and BTW, how do I use the metatag NOIMAGEINDEX? Does it go like this:
meta name="NOIMAGEINDEX" value="1" or how?
Thanks
Fr.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
On 23 Jan 2001, at 1:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and BTW, how do I use the metatag NOIMAGEINDEX? Does it go like this:
meta name="NOIMAGEINDEX" value="1" or how?
META NAME="robots" CONTENT="noimageindex"
The CJZ Sonnar 180 sure has good flare control :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
There was a PZ-1p SE? I have only seen Z-1 SE only. It is in silver colour.
regards,
Alan Chan
If anyone on the list has the Pentax Z-5p or PZ-1p SE (Ltd) bodies for
sale,
please email me offline. I am interested in buying these bodies. Thanks!
Robert James
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 17:36 22.1.2001 -0600, you wrote:
Congratulations on the SFXn. I enjoy the heck out of mine; hope you enjoy
yours, too.
Thanks ;) It sure is a different experience from the K2DMD, but I like it
so far. Only if the RTF didn't set f/2.8 1/60s when ambient light is f/2.8
1/8s ... I was hoping it
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Mark Roberts wrote:
Yikes! Epson *did* explicitly acknowledge the problem and they
have publicly announced the fix. You can indeed find a *lot* of
web pages on Epson's "conspiracy" and "coverup" of this problem.
There are almost as many web pages on this as there are on
Any thoughts on the merits of the 135 f2.5 versus the faster 85 and more
compact 135 f3.5?
Practically, 135mm is significantly longer than 85mm. If you have one lens
for portrait only, I'd say 85mm is more useful. I had the SMC-M 135/3.5
which was very sharp but with dull colour reproduction.
Hi!
I need Sunpak dedicated module for my Pentax, it's module # PE2D, and the
connecting cable, it's Extension cord #11.
Preferably from Europe, as shipping from over could kill me ;)
Or I would be much grateful if somebody sees it in any online shop and
gives me notice.
Thanks a lot!
Hi Bill,
Holiday Inn and coach are not a problem, she just does`nt do camping,
although I still have a lot of camping gear. Maybe some day she`ll try it
again, she had a bad experience camping once.
Las Vegas still sounds good, great place to shoot night shots, casino
gambling shots, and a vast
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Why do we? was: Tripods, cable extensions...?
Me too, most of the time, even though one of my tripods + head
will extend
to 235cm (~92.5") with a 10kg
On 22 Jan 2001, at 16:39, Alan Chan wrote:
Any thoughts on the merits of the 135 f2.5 versus the faster 85 and more
compact 135 f3.5?
I shot a series of portraits over the weekend whilst at a lunch time get-
together with friends using the SMC-P135f2.5 wide open. I could not have
obtained
HI-
A monopod is also convenient if you have lots of snow. Just drive it in
firmly and you have a quite solid support for anything up to a moderate
telephoto or a TLR. In the right snow conditions, which we have for about 4
to 5 months of the year, a monopod will stand very nicely on its own.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
How is it, cost-wise, in the real world? I was looking at converting
one of my old printers to it. Yeah, the Epson system is not at all
designed to pull out a black and white print (though I've made some nice
chocolatey-brown duotones).
It is not
- Original Message -
From: "dosk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Why do we? was: Tripods, cable extensions...?
3. Usually, unless the subject is really close, the height
of
the
tripod doesn't affect point of view
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:11 23.1.2001 +1000, you wrote:
On 22 Jan 2001, at 14:26, dosk wrote:
Here's a chance for another new thread;
---Who here use's a monopod? And why on earth why?
(But I would change the subject title here to "Monopods?", before it
gets to
unwieldy...)
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Sorry folks, but I think you are not being forceful enough about
using Glacial Acetic Acid.
This is an _extremely_ nasty chemical whose _fumes_ will damage
your eyes. I would not dream of opening a bottle in the
confined space of a darkrooom. The smell (and the
Thank you for answering a stupid question - my son lost my instruction
manual (for the second time) and I'm waiting for my new one to arrive from
Pentax.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Cy Galley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject:
P.S. The seller has 72 negative feedback comments in the last six months
- but many, many more positive ones. Still, I've never seen so many
negatives for someone still in business. The comments are all in German,
which I studied in high school but can now recall only a few words of.
Joe
-
This
Words to live by.
Thanks JoMac
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph McAllister" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: Toxicity (was Warning!)
And: eat eggs for breakfast every day; use butter, it's
better; drive
5-10 mph over the
Thanks Chris and james and Darin and Tiger and Juan. I think we
have a source for the stuff in there someplace.
Bill
Subject: Re: Discontinued film format
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, William Robb wrote:
Does anyone know if there is still a source for 620 film? I
know
it can be respooled from
Hi David,
I would`nt wait any longer, call them, it`s free.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "David P. Chernicoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 5:03 PM
Subject: Dealing with Pentax USA repairs
Anyone have any
Yikes! Epson *did* explicitly acknowledge the problem and they have
publicly announced the fix.
You can indeed find a *lot* of web pages on Epson's "conspiracy" and
"coverup" of this problem.
There are almost as many web pages on this as there are on UFOs and Elvis
sightings.
-
And no one ever
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any thoughts on the merits of the 135 f2.5 versus the faster 85
and more compact 135 f3.5?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Practically, 135mm is significantly longer than 85mm. If you
have one lens for portrait only, I'd say 85mm is more useful. I
had the SMC-M 135/3.5
Good pics, good start...
tv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's still a big work in progress. But a quick hack of it is hopefuly
online, with just few photos.
http://www.volny.cz/ffranta/index.html
And now the comments! ;)
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Seems a while back someone (Shel? Bill R?) posted a couple ideas for
finding closed cell foam. Care to replay them?
Doug
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Mine is going camping with me to the Grandfather Mtn Nature weekend. We
used to really enjoy it when we lived in Virginia and I'm really looking
forward to it again after I retire.
I recently got the off axis guider for the scope, now all I need are a few
warmer nights to practice with it
Well, it's still a big work in progress. But a quick hack of it is hopefuly
online, with just few photos.
http://www.volny.cz/ffranta/index.html
And now the comments! ;)
Frantisek
Hi Frantisek
Thanks for putting those up. The mist shots have a nicely romantic feel to
them. And as Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I've not used these
stands much, they are great for
getting down and close in many
situations without resorting to
using bulky or cumbersome tripods.
How about an image of your rig so we can
see how and what you did?
It's quite simple: Get a piece
i wonder what its like opticaly
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: Ebay! Item #1208414897
P.S. The seller has 72 negative feedback comments in the last six months
- but many, many
Does the wife like to shoot too? That`ll be fun. Those astro photos will
be tack sharp with the guider and 800 speed. Should be pretty dark up there
at night. I`ll have to go to Grandfather one of these years, I`ve never been
to
the east coast.
Got my Spot back, tip top shape, and shutter speeds
Norm, this time I'm gonna win. I can feel it.
"Uh, how much for these two strap lugs?"
But I'm serious about the outing, though. And if I bring my wife, she'll
finally get to do something with me and my camera that doesn't involve ticks
and swarming flies, or crawling around on my belly in
Uh, I had -S- on the brain...I meant Peter at camera-direct...I hope he's
not lurking here somewhere.
SETH, Stan and Shel...
Thanks for the responses on finding LX strap lugs. I did contact Steve at
www.camera-direct.com
and I'll be picking up a few from him soon.
Stan, I thought about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 9:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Short telephoto lense recommendations - And where to buy a
(new) LX
I think that both the 85mm and 135mm
Well they claim it is the world's only privately owned
mountain. We could stage a coup, oust the owners, declare
independence, and throw rocks down the mountain at the tanks
when they try to arrest us.
Or, we could just take a lot of photo, enjoy some good company,
and then go home.
Since it
Weird! I have my formating set to 64 characters yet this
truncated. OTH, the sencond post in reply to Ann's did not. ???
-Tom
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
Not really. The problem is you have a lot of truncated tag ends
of
lines. It would be better if every body set their outgoing text
to
Another option (if you are handy and the camera is not too
valuable) is to use a dremel tool to grind out the base of the
camera enough to clear the larger flange of 120 film spools.
Photography on Bald Mountain use to do this with Kodak Metalist
cameras only they disassembled the camera and
Robert,
There are basically two types of finder windows and two types of magnifiers
fit on them. The K2, KX, KM, and K1000 (and maybe even the Spotmatics) use a
slightly smaller one. The ME, MX, ME Super, Super Program, Program Plus, and
PZ-1 all use a slightly bigger one.
The bigger ones
Humm... I am going to have to look into this. I had never
heard off any way you could reduce you tax to less than zero.
Except for income averaging, but they still don't send you cash.
As I said before the poor do not have tax accountants to tell
them how to maximise their after tax income.
Okay my well informed citizens of Pentaxia, I need some help with yet
another one...
I just put a Tamron 7 element 2x TeleConvertor on my FA 50mm f1.4, and am
absolutely delighted with what I now find in my ZX-M's viewfinder!
But some questions
The 2x increases the focal length to
Have you found for yourself an ideal "focal length" eye? I was shooting
with the 50mm and liking it a lot, but there was just a little something
missing... And then the 2x TC was delivered and everything got so much
better. I mean, the 50 seemed a little wide, seemed like most of the things
I
RE: pans in an album. ---
I nearly always end up in the Pan mode with my super wide angle
(15mm)
and even at 20 mm. Keeps my toes out of the photo.
I shot a wedding reception that way, and my wife resolved the mounting
problem with a paper cutter--- she whacked them in half and
dosk wrote:
Have you found for yourself an ideal "focal length" eye? I was shooting
with the 50mm and liking it a lot, but there was just a little something
missing... And then the 2x TC was delivered and everything got so much
better. I mean, the 50 seemed a little wide, seemed like most
The older images were scanned to Kodak PhotoCD. I have a Minolta Dimage
Scan Dual (a low-end film scanner) that I now use to get my pics into
digital format. I generally scan and store pictures at the highest
resolution that the scanner supports (3504x2336 for a 35mm slide). I resize
them for
Atlantic City ???!!!
Chris Niesmertelny wrote:
My suggestion is good 'ole Atlantic City, NJ...
Chris, surely you jest!
nonononono
annsan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
I'm glad to see there are others on the list who feel discretion is the better part
of
valor regarding darkroom chemicals.
To Mike Wilson I say thank you for stressing the dangers.
To MIke Johnson I say, it doesn't really matter to me if technically the amount of
vinegar
I put in the stop isn't
In a message dated 1/22/01 5:38:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj: Re: Why do we? was: Tripods, cable extensions...?
Date: 1/22/01 5:38:35 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SETH)
- Original Message -
From: "dosk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well--- I got the slightly smaller one that is a bit conical. Wonder if we
could
get our resident equipment documenter to post some really good photos
of the various kinds---including the Now discovered by me Magnifier K.
Psst! anyone wanna buy a now documented 'magnifier - k'
One must
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
Ann, part of the problem is AOL 6.0 is crippled. Apparently
users can not turn off HTML for their email. That is why the
small strange type. Your using large type is the reason even
normal text base stuff goes off the screen.
Normal plain text stuff DOESNT go off
Will the casinos in Las Vegas let you wander around shooting
pictures of the gambling? How about shooting the shows?
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
In a message dated 1/22/01 8:15:05 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, Malfud. But how is it with slow speeds and wide apertures? Does it
help with the dreaded camera shake syndrome..?
Yes. For shooting with my 17-28mm wide angle and where one can back up
against
Maybe.
Are you sure you have telephoto eyes? Have you tried a WA yet? You
hadn't mentioned one, just the 50 and tc.
Better hope you like wides, 'cuz if you're a tele guy, you're going to
have to sell your car and start lifting weights to get ready for that
600/4. ;)
BTW, I like wides. My
A couple of other uses for my monopod (a Gitzo with a Bogan ball
head) is a hiking stick (I even sometimes use it when I don't
have a camera with me), and as a pole to hold up a tarp shelter.
As a camera support I find the best way to use it is slanted
back towards me leaning into it. This
Looking to buy a Pentax PZ-1 SE or Z-5p. I mistakenly requested a PZ-1p SE
earlierof which none were made, of course. Sorry! The Z-5p was made for
the Japan market only.
Please email me directly. Thanks!
Robert James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Bob Walkden wrote:
No. The real answer is to use wolfskin.
Why do I find this idea so abominable?
--Tom (AKA graywolf)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
John wrote: Coffee as a developer?? Now that _is_ cool.
---
Hi John and all.
Two years ago I saw (by link from PDMLers) article on the
web about real use of coffe as developer...
Maybe someone remember where is it?
Den
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Robert P. VanNatta writes:
P.S. -- one more clue. -- the one I got matches Bojidar's photo
"magnifer.jpg"
depicting a magnifier mounted on a camera (I believe a K2) hidden under
the key word "magnifier" on his focusing aids page.
I think I've seen one of these in a local secondhand
Shel Belinkoff writes:
There's an unused plastic tarp
in my garage, and just the other day I was thinking that I had
no use for it. Now I do ... I'm going to toss it into the trunk
of my car, along with a few other photo-related items that I
always carry, and use it to lie upon when
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
