tions, or true continua; and the modes of reasoning about these three
are quite distinct" (CP 1.283, 1902). In the subsequent sentences, Peirce
identifies topical geometry as the study of true continua, then situates
both arithmetic (rational numbers) and calculus (real numbers) within the
study of infi
enoscopic sciences? What useful applications of synechism
can we identify in the special/idioscopic sciences? What additional
insights can we gain from further contemplating continuity in light of the
categories, and the categories in light of continuity?
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, K
y. It is not a term that can
be predicated of anything of which certain other terms can be predicated,
it is "an indefinite significant character."
JFS: We acknowledge that the definition of the word 'mark' generally refers
to a physical instance. But any English word that refers to so
his topic.
Later, maybe not; better is obviously a subjective judgment. I have quoted
several passages in this post alone, as well as in my previous posts, that
I believe are *better *in the sense that they are *clearer*.
JFS: My primary concern is that you and Jon have made claims abut Peirce
w
words for its existent
embodiments, namely, "tokens" that are "instances" of the type (CP 4.537,
1906). Hence, the quoted passage in R L376 turns out to have no relevance
whatsoever to what we call the *possible* member of this
trichotomy--"tone," "mark," or some
it
is not *significant*--it has no effect on the *meaning *of the EG.
JFS: This note answers every question, objection, and alternative that
anybody has written in all the notes on this subject.
Again, there is a stark contrast between such a forceful (and overreaching)
pronouncement with wh
p distinctions, although the necessitant typically *involves
*the existent and the possible, and the existent *involves *the possible.
For example, every sign must be *either *a seme, a pheme, or a delome; but
all delomes *involve *phemes and semes, and all phemes *involve *semes.
Regards,
ot; thus incorrectly
treating it as virtually synonymous with "token" instead of
"tone/tuone/tinge/potisign."
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlan
elationship cannot be built up from dyadic relationships. Whoever thinks
it can be so composed has overlooked the fact that *composition *is itself
a triadic relationship, between the two (or more) components and the
composite whole" (CP 6.321, c. 1907).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, K
mperative, a proposition
presented for contemplation whose final interpretant's purpose is to
produce self-control.
- An assertion is an imperative phemic temperative, a proposition urged
by an act of insistence whose final interpretant's purpose is to produce
self-control.
Regards,
J
dy have a sense of what it means, but in fact they *do not* have in
mind "Objects which are Signs so far as they are merely possible, but felt
to be positively possible" (CP 8.363, EP 2:488, 1908 Dec 25).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist P
76r-277r, 1906 Apr 2), both must be embodied
in sinsigns/tokens in order to *act *as signs. In fact, every
sinsign/token *involves
*qualisigns/tones of a peculiar kind, and every iconic sinsign/token *embodies
*a qualisign.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist
sider the word 'tone'. If anybody
else has any further evidence (or just a personal preference) one way or
the other, please let us know.
Gary already provided anecdotal evidence to the contrary and expressed his
personal preference for "tone." As always, my own priority is accurately
understandi
gly disagree. On the contrary, I
have explicitly stated more than once that anyone is welcome to hold that
opinion and make a case for it. Nevertheless, as I have also stated more
than once, no one can accurately claim that it was *Peirce's *final and
definitive choice.
Regards,
Jon Al
and I provided a
long excerpt from his Logic Notebook that has not previously appeared in
this or any other recent List thread, where he describes what he has in
mind (using "tuone") and carefully distinguishes it from a type. By
contrast, much of the post below is repetition of previously exp
d that you had read Tony's writings. I strongly urge you to
study them.
I said that I have likewise read *and *carefully studied about a dozen
articles by Tony Jappy, as well as his 2017 book, *Peirce's Twenty-Eight
Sign Classes and the Philosophy of Representation* (
https://list.iupui.edu/sy
uot;scarlet" and "crimson" are
different terms that both have the term "red" as a mark--anything that is
scarlet or crimson is also red. However, the *term* "red" is obviously not
a tone/potisign, it is always a token/actisign of a type/famisign. On the
other hand,
are Signs so far as they are merely possible,
but felt to be positively possible" (CP 8.347, EP 2:483, 1908 Dec 24).
In short, a tone/mark is a *possible *sign, distinguished from a token as
an *existent *sign and a type as a *necessitant *sign. Again, none of this
is at all controversial am
(possibles/existents/necessitants).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:58 PM Edwina Taborsky
wrote:
>
> 1] ET: I’m not sure w
computer scientists very readily accept the trichotomy
> (mark token type), but not (tone token type). Since Peirce was always
> writing for the future, that makes 'mark' the choice for the future. A
> tone is a limited and confusing special case of mark.
>
> On this point, Tony m
the dynamical interpretant (actual effect) is
either that of a feeling (for a sympathetic sign), that of an exertion (for
a percussive sign), or that of another sign (for a usual sign); and the *mode
of presentation* of the immediate interpretant (range of possible effects)
is either as abstract qualities (for
e everyone to study *his *writings in light of our different
arguments, and then draw their own conclusions about *his *views based on
those texts.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / t
he purpose of the final
interpretant. I find the former much more plausible than the latter.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:53
*any
*attached
lines of identity, if that were allowed in Beta EGs--the interpretant as
represented by the sign is presented as a possible, not an existent.
Regards,
Jon
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:39 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> List:
>
> It is telling that this rebuttal does not addre
an
have *different *tones, yet be tokens of the *same *type; and two things
can have (some of) the *same *tones, yet be tokens of *different *types.
JFS: It confirms Peirce's final choice.
Indeed--his final choice of "tone" (R 339, 27 Dec 1908,
https://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:152
ill
vacillating between these two options, and specifically *asked *her to help
him choose one?
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 1
d correlate; and for the genuine triadic
relation, coming last. He *never *provided a typology with all ten
trichotomies arranged in their proper *logical *order for sign
classification--if he had done so, then there would obviously be no room
for debate about what he had in mind. Instead, we
order to deal with modals." A
straightforward reading of that text itself is that he simply needs a new
notation to replace the unsatisfactory (broken) cuts of 1903 and
nonsensical tinctures of 1906 for representing and reasoning about
propositions involving possibility and necessity.
Regards,
Jon Alan
is on RLT 151 (1898)--"That you are a good girl is much to
be wished."
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 8:2
ly *kind of investigation that Peirce discusses
here is a mathematical demonstration.
JFS: The complexity of the investigation is the reason why Delta graphs are
a completely new branch of EGs.
Again, Peirce's *only *stated reason for needing "to add a *Delta *part" to
EGs is &quo
ne instead of a dotted
oval/line.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:52 PM Jerry LR Chandler <
jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> wrot
ions (consequent). For example, if the EGs
for Euclid's five postulates are scribed in the margin, then they can be
iterated to the interior, where the EGs for all the theorems of Euclidean
geometry can be derived from them in accordance with the usual permissions.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Ol
dictionary work" (W 8:xlviii-xlix).
Nevertheless, this was in 1891--two full decades before Peirce wrote the
letter to Risteen that we have been discussing, which itself says nothing
whatsoever about Cayley's trees, nor any other particular "organization of
the papers."
Regards,
ready made at length
about the "many papers."
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 4:37 PM John F Sowa wrote:
> I j
the margin and the consequent
(theorems) inside the red line.
- Those pages in R 514 are among the "Fragments on Existential Graphs"
that properly belong there and are dated 1909, not from the misfiled letter
to Kehler of June 1911 (R L231) that includes a "tutorial" on EGs (N
with Alpha, Beta, or Gamma EGs--they do
not "deal with modals" and are not otherwise unique to Delta EGs.
Cheers,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On S
u are maintaining a sense of humor. Again, I have
appreciated the stimulating exchange and have learned quite a bit from it
about how Peirce anticipated the use of metalanguage in logic, even though
we continue to disagree on whether it has anything to do with Delta EGs.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Ol
he top of
letters denoting propositions that would be true in them fits the bill.
Moreover, Peirce himself suggested this solution (R 339:[340r], LF 1:624,
1909 Jan 7), although he evidently never worked out the details. I believe
that I have done so in my forthcoming paper.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmi
as spelled out in my forthcoming paper, they provide *graphical *solutions
for iterated modalities, modal axioms, etc.
JFS: And we should all remember that Peirce List is a collaboration, not a
competition. If somebody corrects one of our mistakes, we should thank them
for the correction. (
https
les of how you would represent (and reason
about) even *very simple* modal propositions, despite my multiple requests?
By contrast, I am happy to show you how I would scribe that graph in my
candidate for Delta EGs based on R 339:[340r] (1909).
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Ka
he sheet is true, in this case
because the one scribing all the EGs is "the author of truth"--either God
the Creator himself or what Peirce describes elsewhere (referencing
Cudworth) as "a blind agent intermediate between God and the world" (R 870,
1901).
Regards,
r the "lines of identity" (Peirce's term) in the
Beta part because of the obvious and fundamental semiotic difference
between describing *things *with names (rhemes/semes) and describing *states
of things* with propositions (dicisigns/phemes).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
St
903) and tinctures
(1906), such as the one that he introduces on R 339:[340r] (1909 Jan 7).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:14 PM
tation in Gamma EGs asserts a proposition about a proposition, but there
is no hint of anything like it in R L376 (nor R 514).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
he was considering a new notation for
representing and reasoning about modal propositions to replace his
unsatisfactory broken cuts (1903) and tinctures (1906), such as the one
that he introduces on R 339:[340r].
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosophe
ng (R 339:[340r], 1909 Jan 7). Echoing Zeman's remark in the
quotation above, the sameness or continuity of a possible state of things
(PST) as represented by a heavy line of compossibility (LoC) in my
candidate for Delta EGs is *not *the same as the identity of individuals as
represented by a he
during
Peirce's lifetime, and various logicians contributed pieces to the puzzle
decades after his death. How would such complexity be handled in your
candidate for Delta EGs? So far, you have not even been willing/able to
show/tell us how you would represent several *very simple* modal
propos
*only *goal of the IKL logic "to deal with modals"? That is
Peirce's *only
*stated goal for Delta EGs.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Wed, Mar 6, 20
-not a finding of the *special
*sciences, which have largely adopted the opposite assumptions of
reductionism, determinism, and materialism.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.co
didate going farther than that can only be offered
as a hypothesis, not treated as a definitive specification. I am still
wondering exactly how yours would represent the five modal propositions
that he wrote in his Logic Notebook, if not exactly as he scribed their EGs
on that page (R 339:[340r], 1909 Jan 7).
e universe is constantly proceeding from a PST with only
facts (no laws) toward a PST with only laws (no facts), while the AST
always has *both* facts and laws.
Regards,
Jon
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:50 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> List:
>
> I need to amend my previous post explaining m
clusions; or in an if-then proposition,
they constitute the antecedent (in the shaded margin) from which other
propositions *follow necessarily* as the consequent (in the remaining
unshaded area). That is how *all *the theorems of Euclidean geometry are
derived from its five postulates.
Regards,
Jon Ala
ual
permissions allow the last three transformations to derive *q*.
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:02 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> List:
>
> The sole reason that Peirce expresses in R L376 (1911 Dec 6) for needing
> to add a Delta part to EGs is "in
ulates as its law-propositions and the theorems as its
fact-propositions.
JFS: I thank you for raising all those objections.
Likewise, I thank you for the exchange. As I acknowledge in the other
thread, it is what prompted me to develop an interesting extension of my
candidate for Delta EGs.
Regards,
Jon
in in the second mode of clearness the three Modalities. The
May be, The Actually is, The Would be." In other words, he explicitly
reaffirms his definition of modality as possibility/actuality/necessity,
although we do not have the preceding pages that presumably provide more
details.
with iterated modalities while preparing for the 1903
Lowell Lectures (R S-1:[74], LF 2/2:398), but there are reasons to suspect
that he ultimately would have dispensed with them in accordance with
pragmaticism. That is a subject for another post.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
St
hat are missing, but unless and until someone finds them,
we can only speculate.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 4:44 PM John F Sow
r certainly) true." As far as I know, he *never
*refers to propositions involving other expressions like "proposition C is
written in Holy Scriptures" or "proposition D is much to be wished" as
"modal." Can you provide any exact quotations where he does so?
R
that one criterion by combining the graphs
scribed in R 339:[340r] with the "red pencil" improvement in R 514 and the
"many papers" concept in R L376.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com
678, LF
1:158-159, 1910)
Nevertheless, as I observe in both of my forthcoming papers, other
modalities can be incorporated into the various formal systems, as long as
they are *analogous* to possibility and necessity. Peirce hints at *epistemic
*logic here, and in my semantics paper, I menti
4)
◇(*p* ∧ *q*), and (5) ◇*p* ∧ ◇*q* ∧ ¬◇(*p* ∧ *q*); again, in each case, *p*
and *q* are atomic non-modal propositions.
JLRC: Do either of you feel that your interpretations of "delta graphs"
bridge the yawning gaps between semiotics and semiology?
I doubt it since that is not the purpo
you just stipulate the usual modal axioms--for
example, "necessary" may always be changed to "possible" (D), "actual" (T),
or "necessarily necessary" (4)?
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Luther
re speculation. I prefer to stick to his writings as we
have them, and as far as I know, he never says anything in them to suggest
that he was "laying out a diagram of papers" for a new version of EGs when
it happened.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer
ve in mind?
JFS: Meanwhile, there are some questions to ponder:
Any answers to such questions about the details of Peirce's unfortunate
accident are pure speculation. It seems to me that if it had happened while
he was "laying out a diagram of papers" for a new version of EGs, then he
l
e about the former as Peirce's own term for his metaphysical
doctrine in 1891?
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 2:35 AM Michae
phemic sheet of a Delta graph consists of multiple
> “papers”, each of which represents a different time, aspect, or modality of
> some universe of discourse. Although Peirce did not specify the details of
> Delta graphs, a combination of features mentioned in several 1911
> manuscripts would
e
that he states for adding a Delta part.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at
https://cspeirce.com and, ju
f *any
*goal/purpose/intention
at all.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:05 PM John F Sowa wrote:
> Edwina, Jon, List,
>
>
Those are two totally different activities. The test is not a
> method of communication by means of sentences. It is a method for
> determining the structure of a sign.
>
> John
>
> --
> *From*: "Jon Alan Schmidt"
> *Sent*: 2/15/24 9
d to or subtracted
from someone's answer to a question in ordinary conversation reflects the
context-dependency of both utterances, as well as the dialogic nature of
human semiosis. Consequently, it is better to stick with Peirce's own
paradigmatic conceptions for distinguishing 1ns/2ns/3ns as discove
/http://www.commens.org/), but it
came back up a couple of days ago.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:37 PM Helmut Raulien wrote
t is not a genuine example of 3ns?"
>
> Yes, indeed. I admit that I made a mistake in that statement. But
> insults are never appropriate in any collaboration. You have every right
> to state your opinions, right or wrong. But an insult is never
> appropriate. And
me question. Maybe he intended the second one to be,
"Can anybody find an example of an answer to a question that begins with
the word 'Why' but is not a genuine example of 3ns?" Of course, I already
fulfilled both requests, but he dismissed my counterexamples with a bunch
of hand-wav
ntelligibility) is
more generally accurate than defining 3ns in terms of (conscious)
intentionality or purpose.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Tu
ns rather than 3ns. Nevertheless, as already noted,
there are abundant passages (like the first quotation above) where Peirce
treats other ideas, where intentionality is lacking, as paradigmatic of
3ns--such as continuity, diffusion, the whole numbers, and even explosions.
Regards,
Jon Al
in the idea, that we cannot get an idea of something that does
> not exist. I am not totally convinced anymore about the reality of
> continuum. The question seems quasi-theological to me.
>
> Best, Helmut
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 12. Februar 2024 um 20:57 Uhr
> *Von:* "Jon A
on the area of
the blackboard" (NEM 4:345, 1898; see also CP 6.203-209, 1898).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:01 AM Helmu
etant must come *after *the
sympathetic/percussive/usual trichotomy for the dynamical interpretant. If
it were the other way around, as some scholars advocate, then *only *relative
propositions with at least two lines of identity could be scribed on the
sheet of assertion.
Regards,
Jon Alan
law of thermodynamics stage left.)
>
> Best, Mike
> On 2/11/2024 5:03 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Mike:
>
> I am glad that we agree on that point. I also agree that it is a mistake
> to treat semiosis as the most fundamental aspect of Peirce's philosophy,
> and that
s is prescinded from
3ns; but 2ns cannot be built up from 1ns, and 3ns cannot be built up from
1ns and 2ns.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Sun, Feb 11,
d such subjects
from the continuous flow of semiosis as if they were *individual *constituents
of the universe, we also need to account for their general logical
relations with each other, and that is where pure/continuous predicates
come into play.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
te, there are now two
subjects (lowercase letters) and four predicates (uppercase letters).
Throwing everything possible into the subject, there are six subjects--four
general concepts (names) and two indefinite individuals (lines of
identity)--and a single pure/continuous predicate (syntax).
[image: i
ion that an EG represents--descriptive
names for general concepts, and designative lines of identity for
indefinite individuals. The pure/continuous predicate that signifies the
proposition's interpretant is *always* iconically diagrammatized by the
syntax--the arrangement on the sheet of assertion of t
ly denotes one of its objects, while
its syntax is the pure predicate that iconically signifies its interpretant
as the general form of their logical relations (CP 5.542, c. 1902-3; CP
5.151, EP 2:208, 1903; R 611, 1908 Oct 28; NEM 3:885-886, 1908 Dec 5; SS
70-72, 1908 Dec 14; R 664, 1910 Nov 26-2
terpretant.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:10 AM Michael Shapiro wrote:
> Those who are interested in exploring th
piro wrote:
> Yes, it does, Jon.
>
> M.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Alan Schmidt
> Sent: Feb 3, 2024 2:04 PM
> To: Peirce-L
> Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Interpretants
>
>
> Michael, List:
>
> I honestly do not know much about linguistics, but I wo
Michael, List:
I honestly do not know much about linguistics, but I wonder if this online
chapter from your 1983 book, *The Sense of Grammar: Language as Semiotic*,
is still a good summary of your relevant views.
https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/3/oa_monograph/chapter/3056317
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt
more *important or useful than a
theory of interpretants?
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:22 PM Gary Richmond
wrote:
> John, J
communicational.
>
> Maybe these threee classes of context are categorially 1ns, 2ns, 3ns?
>
> And if, I think, there should be a second context for the object too, in
> which it is divided other than into immediate and dynamical.
>
> Best, Helmut
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 02. Fe
more or less than what the author intended; happily we can be generous
and charitable in our initial judgments and trust that intention and
achievement may coincide more often than not."
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Luthera
ng performed (
https://www.structuremag.org/?p=10373).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:13 AM Helmut Raulien wrote:
> Jon, Cecile,
s of itself. (EP
2:545n25, 1906)
CSP: [T]he explanation of the phenomenon lies in the fact that the entire
universe,--not merely the universe of existents, but all that wider
universe, embracing the universe of existents as a part, the universe which
we are all accustomed to refer to as "the truth,&q
a*
> MC anglais UPPA ∗ SSH ∗ LEA
> Maître de Conférences en Etudes Anglophones
> *Associate Professor of English as a Second Language*
> *Semiotics • Linguistics • Grammar • Translation*
>
> --
> *De: *"Jon Alan Schmidt"
> *À: *"Peirce-L&q
for sure where to insert 10th (DO-S-FI), although Peirce's
corresponding names in some versions (abducent/inducent/deducent) suggest
that it is a division of arguments, so it presumably comes after 9th (S-FI).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechis
collective actuous token.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 2:55 PM Cécile Cosculluela <
cecile.coscullu...@univ-pau.fr> wrote:
&g
, 2024 at 1:21 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> Cécile, List:
>
> As Peirce states in the accompanying text, the triangular diagram in CP
> 8.376 (also EP 2:491) indicates ten sign classes that can be obtained from
> three trichotomies--one for the object, one for the interp
in which the whole is ontologically prior to its parts,
which are likewise signs but indefinite unless and until deliberately
marked off for a particular purpose.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.
accordance with this distinction, perhaps people with aphantasia
*have *visual
sensations of images at each moment while looking at them, but then are
unable to *remember *them afterwards due to the merely vestigial
compulsiveness of such memories and/or an incapacity in their imaginative
faculties.
Regards,
Jon Al
that *every *proposition is true if the
antecedent is true (CP 4.454-456, 1903; CP 4.564n, c. 1906; R 300:[47-51],
1908; R 669:[16-18], 1911).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt
l logical interpretant. Consequently, the most perfect account of a
concept that words can convey will consist in a description of the habit
which that concept is calculated to produce. But how otherwise can a habit
be described than by a description of the kind of action to which it gives
rise, with
1 - 100 of 2002 matches
Mail list logo
