Christopher Lee wrote:
I am new to PHP and wanted to ask a question which I think is related to this
discussion thread. What are you referring to when using the term PHP
Framework? I downloaded Eclipse-JEE with PHP Development Tools. Would this
development environment constitute a PHP
,
Christopher
From: Laruence [larue...@baidu.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 11:19 PM
To: Floyd Resler
Cc: PHP
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP frameworks
Hi:
if you have high performance need, you can considering Yaf( a PHP
framework which is build in PHP extension)
http
Hi:
if you have high performance need, you can considering Yaf( a PHP
framework which is build in PHP extension)
http://pecl.php.net/package/Yaf
thanks
Best regards
惠新宸 Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/
On 2011/7/22 20:38, Floyd Resler wrote:
On Jul 22, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Richard
it.
Wasalaam,
Muhsin
On 07/22/2011 11:56 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 21 July 2011 23:56, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what
On 21 July 2011 23:56, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
about intermediate in PHP
On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
Oooh, interesting! I will check out CakePHP! Thanks
On 22 July 2011 13:26, Floyd Resler fres...@adex-intl.com wrote:
On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if
On Jul 22, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 22 July 2011 13:26, Floyd Resler fres...@adex-intl.com wrote:
On Jul 21, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net
wrote:
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
Thank you,
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
Thank you,
Try CodeIgniter ( http
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone
+1 for CI! it's a joy to work with
Bastien Koert
905-904-0334
On 2011-07-21, at 5:20 PM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get
EBastien phps...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for CI! it's a joy to work with
Bastien Koert
905-904-0334
On 2011-07-21, at 5:20 PM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP
On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
Thank you,
So, with your post you will probably get
+1 for CI.
If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
That would be pretty sweet. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net
On 7/21/2011 4:00 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
+1 for CI.
If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
That would be pretty sweet. :)
So, what
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Jim Lucas li...@cmsws.com wrote:
So, what would said admin interface allow you to administrate?
Your app models?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse rgmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Your app models?
More specifically, your app model data. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 07/21/2011 07:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse rgmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Your app models?
More specifically, your app model data. :)
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
--
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
Oooh, interesting! I will check out CakePHP! Thanks for tip! :)
--
PHP General Mailing List
I was specifically curious if there are frameworks which use the convention
of passing config objects to functions/methods in the same way that
contemporary JS libraries like jQuery do.
--
Regards,
Jerome
jeromecoving...@gmail.com
--
http://www.jeromecovington.com
One Plus the World
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jerome Covington jeromecoving...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was specifically curious if there are frameworks which use the convention
of passing config objects to functions/methods in the same way that
contemporary JS libraries like jQuery do.
We use Zend Framework
Which framework to use is more of a religious war than anything, but I would
recommend Symfony. It has a nice architechture and is very extendable.
++Tim Hinnerk Heuer++
http://www.ihostnz.com
2009/11/13 Sudheer Satyanarayana sudhee...@sudheer.net
I doubt you'll get a reasoned bunch of
Hi,
I need to select a PHP framework for a small project about 20-25 pages (but
expected to grow in the future). I was looking at the comparison chart at
http://www.phpframeworks.com/.
After browsing through some forums seems like CodeIgniter is the popular
option. *** But I really like event
Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
Hi,
I need to select a PHP framework for a small project about 20-25 pages (but
expected to grow in the future). I was looking at the comparison chart at
http://www.phpframeworks.com/.
After browsing through some forums seems like CodeIgniter is the popular
Thanks :-)
Tried searching the archives, but maybe I was not using the correct search
terms.
Will give it another try.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
Hi,
I need to select a PHP framework for a small project about 20-25
Hi,
...
I doubt you'll get a reasoned bunch of suggestions, more a religious
war... :-) Still, I like PEAR components.
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 graphing: RGraph - www.rgraph.net (updated 8th November)
Lots of PHP and Javascript code - http://www.phpguru.org
--
PHP General Mailing List
I doubt you'll get a reasoned bunch of suggestions, more a religious
war... :-) Still, I like PEAR components.
Exactly.
You have to visit the websites of frameworks, comparison articles, etc
and find out for yourself which one suits you best.
Currently, if I get to decide, I choose ZF
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
Whole thing of Server Side MVC and other yada yada was became joke. Those
server siders become JSON pushers for JS frameworks.
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
Whole thing of Server Side MVC and other yada yada was became
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will
take html generation jobs from server side.
Whole
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:58 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. The deprecation of
usefulness of any technology is based on
2009/3/23 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
However, I have heard of new javascript being run server-side. What's the
likelihood of that catching on and surpassing php?
http://aptana.com/jaxer
I really like the idea, but I'm yet to have a good reason to try it.
If you're starting from scratch it
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:43 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular
@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
2009/3/23 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
However, I have heard of new javascript being run server-side.
What's the
likelihood of that catching on and surpassing php?
http://aptana.com/jaxer
I really like the idea, but I'm yet to have a good
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS
Arno Kuhl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.netwrote:
Arno Kuhl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably
At 10:50 AM -0400 3/23/09, Bastien Koert wrote:
Tedd,
JS has been running on MS servers for a long time. It was always
viewes as an acceptable replacement for vbscript.
Well -- that's been my fear. I think that M$ is trying to get it's
foot into this so they can charge for it -- similar to
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 10:50 AM -0400 3/23/09, Bastien Koert wrote:
Tedd,
JS has been running on MS servers for a long time. It was always viewes as
an acceptable replacement for vbscript.
Well -- that's been my fear. I think that M$ is
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:43 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. The
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:24:55 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:58 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
From: Daniel Kolbo
P.P.P.S. What might be nice is to have an online repository of PHP
community approved classes, then programmers could mix and match
'modules' as needed...well now I am sounding like that snake oil
salesman.
You mean something like CPAN over in the Perl arena? Or
Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
No it won't.
People are getting sick and tired of allowing third scripts to modify
the DOM - browsers are
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
P.P.P.S. What might be nice is to have an online repository of PHP
community approved classes, then programmers could mix and match
'modules' as needed...well now I am sounding like that snake oil salesman.
There is a php class web site that focuses on OO
Bob McConnell wrote:
However, don't limit it to classes. There
are enough non-OO people that collections of usable function libraries
should also be worth assembling. I would also suggest including unit
test fixtures and utilities in any collection.
Bob McConnell
Most functions can be
Sorry for top posting, but here goes...
Stopping third party js from running on the client will never happen.
If so, you just killed your servers thru put in attempting to handle
things like google maps, google analytics and other fun things coming
out of companies like that ( google, zoho
Phpster wrote:
Sorry for top posting, but here goes...
Stopping third party js from running on the client will never happen. If
so, you just killed your servers thru put in attempting to handle things
like google maps, google analytics and other fun things coming out of
companies like that (
Hi Guys,
I have been using cakephp for a while as a development framework.
I'm also thinking for a while to use another framework and leave cakephp
alone (too much babbling.. it takes too much time until you get to the code
itself..), now I have decided to move on and here comes my question.
Do
Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
fastest time to learn and get into code?
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Graham Christensen
graham.christen...@iamgraham.net wrote:
Look into Doctorine || Propel,
Qcodo and symfony both have an ORM layer that can do that. They will
provide/return and basic set of classes that interact with those tables.
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:52, Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have been using cakephp for a while as a
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com...
Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
fastest time to learn and get into code?
Generally
Tony Marston wrote:
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com...
Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
fastest time to learn and get
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 10:54 -1000, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello,
I changed the subject because I did not want to steal Nitsan's thread.
I hope you started a New email and didn't just change the subject...
otherwise you've hijacked the thread. I can't tell I keep threading off.
There seem to
: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:54 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: Tony Marston
Subject: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Tony Marston wrote:
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com
there.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:54 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: Tony Marston
Subject: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Tony Marston wrote:
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
/
-Original Message-
From: Micah Gersten [mailto:news.php@micahscomputing.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP
seem to be a promising
future contender.
Thanks - Marc
Measure twice and cut once.
-Original Message-
From: haliphax [mailto:halip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:57 PM
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Marc Christopher Hall
m...@hallmarcwebsites.com wrote:
@todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I not
have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a fresher
set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank
of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
frameworks out there.
hi,
all php frameworks have overheads which you don't have to worry about.
those overhead codes are there to make things easy for you so you can
focus on building your application.
for me, the most important
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
ja...@freespeechpub.co.za wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs.
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
ja...@freespeechpub.co.za wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
ja...@freespeechpub.co.za wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
--
// Todd
--
PHP General
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
I'd love to
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony, Mojavi,
Navigator, WACT, etc.
I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework seems
to be the most promising?
Thanks,
Marc
---
Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
www.ubuntu.com
--
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:54:01PM -0400, HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony, Mojavi,
Navigator, WACT, etc.
I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework seems
to
HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony, Mojavi,
Navigator, WACT, etc.
I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework seems
to be the most promising?
Thanks,
-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
HallMarc Websites wrote:
First time caller; long time listener..
I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony,
Mojavi,
Navigator, WACT, etc.
I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework
Ok. I've done some reading on frameworks for PHP now, and have this
question.
What are some good resources for learning about the various frameworks
available, and do you recomend one over another? If so why?
I started using PHP before frameworks came into the picture, and then had to
take
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Frank Stanovcak
blindspot...@comcast.net wrote:
Ok. I've done some reading on frameworks for PHP now, and have this
question.
What are some good resources for learning about the various frameworks
available, and do you recomend one over another? If so why?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Frank Stanovcak
blindspot...@comcast.netwrote:
Ok. I've done some reading on frameworks for PHP now, and have this
question.
What are some good resources for learning about the various frameworks
available, and do you recomend one over another? If so why?
He is right.
CI is the fastest, but ZEND has awesome flexibility.
I usually uses CI, just because it is written in PHP4 and in about 50% of
the servers in Israel there is no PHP5 :X
But I really like Zend.
I will suggest the OP to download the latest CI (as far as I remember the
version is
Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
I usually uses CI, just because it is written in PHP4 and in about 50% of
the servers in Israel there is no PHP5 :X
I am just curious. Why is PHP 5 so rare there?
--
Skip Evans
Big Sky Penguin, LLC
503 S Baldwin St, #1
Madison WI
If you would have drawn a graph of technological development of Israel I
guess that you would have got something like a straight line with a really
big inclination.
People here want to start developing online when they doesn't even know the
basics, most of the server administrators here installs
Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
In Israel most of the servesr run centos
I first came across centos a few years back at a client's
hosting facility and had never heard of it before, though it
seems to have a large install base.
I heard it's a free version of Enterprise Redhat???
Not sure, though,
Hi all,
Maybe this has past the list a couple of times (just like the 'storing
images in a DB' question).
What I'm after is a framework that is simple, solid, compact and
flexible enough to extend by myself.
I'm not an OOP person. But I do use classes when I think they fit a
purpose. But
On 3/12/08, Aschwin Wesselius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm after is a framework that is simple, solid, compact and
flexible enough to extend by myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#Comparison_of_features
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
Andrés Robinet wrote:
I want a framework I can plug a microphone in, and talk to it, and it does the
job for me (really, I need it). But I guess we are far away from that.
You need it? And what happens if you won't get it in a life time?
If you need REAL RAD (a la Delphi), use VCL for
-Original Message-
From: Aschwin Wesselius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:14 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Frameworks
Hi all,
Maybe this has past the list a couple of times (just like the 'storing
images in a DB' question).
What
-Original Message-
From: Aschwin Wesselius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:04 PM
To: Andrés Robinet
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks
Andrés Robinet wrote:
I want a framework I can plug a microphone in, and talk
Andrés Robinet wrote:
Anyway... you will get one thousand opinions about Frameworks, and 90% of them
may be correct. Choose the framework you like after playing around with some
examples and having an overview of the reference manual (forgot to say,
documentation is really important to get you
I think you pegged it... the benefit is that you save time, the
drawback is that you're limited in what you can do. I think you have
to review each framework and chose one based on your personal
preferences, the project at hand, etc.
On Nov 2, 2006, at 7:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this subject has been covered in the past, but my question is why
use them? I'm hoping to not create a religious war... I see that
frameworks would probably help you develop some things faster, but most
of the time they don't do the things the way I would want them to work.
If I did use
I know this subject has been covered in the past, but my question is why
use them? I'm hoping to not create a religious war... I see that
frameworks would probably help you develop some things faster, but most
of the time they don't do the things the way I would want them to work.
If I did
I personal prefer Frameworks. I tried some of them.
But in my opinion, those are not made to create application fater, no.
With Frameworks, you can maintaine your application better. You have a global
place where everything can be changed on one file. Ofc, its also possible
that this improves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this subject has been covered in the past, but my question is why
use them?
it's kind of the same question as 'why use software libraries?' - which is
kind of answered by 'do you want to write your own TCP/IP stack *everytime*
you write a network enabled piece
I am using Code Igniter on two projects at the moment and I am loving it.
All the tedious, repetitive elements are reduced, security is increased and
code organised in a clean fashion (you can of course mis-use frameworks but
with effort they can promote and facilitate a cleaner, more modular
Hello,
on 08/05/2006 11:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
This is necessary to escape wildcards characters that should be taken
literally in patterns. It is needed to implement the auto-complete
feature using SQL conditions of type field LIKE 'typed-text%'. If
typed-text contains % or
need to say before actually getting into what you
want to talk about. Just take for example the post about recommend php
framework, look how much you have to read before actually get any info
relating directly to php frameworks. Is true that there are many things to
say before about frameworks
the things you need to say before actually getting into what you
want to talk about. Just take for example the post about recommend php
framework, look how much you have to read before actually get any info
relating directly to php frameworks. Is true that there are many things to
say before about
Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine
any framework to see that it is
not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP frameworks that
exist to reach that conclusion.
And there's the rub... your article was not about what YOU needed it was
what YOU
of something.
I bow before you.
Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any framework to see that it is
not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP frameworks that
exist to reach that conclusion.
And there's
use any framework to see that it is
not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP frameworks that
exist to reach that conclusion.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You're either pro-choice with a
myriad of choices
of something.
I bow before you.
Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any framework to see that it is
not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP frameworks that
exist to reach that conclusion.
And there's
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
