Re: QtWebEngine build fails

2016-12-25 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi Unfortunately the build logs does not show the compiler invocations, so it is a bit hard to guess what's going on. But at least with webkit, we had to forcefully disable debug symbols to get stuff to build. dwarf2 is huge. and webengine is huge. So start by checking that - and please make

Re: Digikam 5.0.0 uploaded

2016-07-11 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 10 July 2016 14:01:04 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > 2. The configuration files are in a new location, but digikam does no > migration [1]. To the user, it appears you are starting from scratch and > there is a risk of confusion -- the referenced bug is from someone who > thought

Re: Bug#810124: digikam: Does not show albums until kbuildsycoca is manually called

2016-01-10 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Saturday 09 January 2016 15:01:19 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > I recently picked up maintenance of digikam and haven't finished ramping up > on KDE internals... > > I received the following bug report. I haven't noticed this problem myself, > so it makes me wonder: > > 1. When,

Re: Enabling accessibility stack by default in Qt4/Qt5

2015-12-30 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Friday 11 December 2015 23:41:00 Samuel Thibault wrote: > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, on Fri 11 Dec 2015 18:11:40 -0300, wrote: > > Ah, now I get it. Please go ahead. > > Good, now done! Konqueror seems to crash for me now. Removing qt-at-spi fixes it. I don't know if there are

Re: Digikam

2015-12-20 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 20 December 2015 11:21:05 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi Lisandro, > > On December 20, 2015 01:18:31 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > On Saturday 19 December 2015 23:58:34 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > I found the config file (commit-access-control.cfg). Who is able to >

Re: Keeping the Qt5 stack together: some ideas

2015-10-30 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 29 October 2015 17:46:12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > - it turned out to not use any symbol from qtbase >= 5.5.x, so after being > built it's dependencies got satisfied with testing's ones. > > Except it broke. > > a) Suggested by Adam Majer and improved by Felix

Re: Enabling accessibility stack by default in Qt4/Qt5

2015-10-18 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 18 October 2015 17:24:59 Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Could the qt-at-spi package be depended on by e.g. libqtcore4? Hi I guess one could put in a suggests somewhere, or maybe even a recommends, but having it as a dependency would be making a dependency circle which I really

Re: kdecoration2 mess - std::function makes the world fun

2015-08-21 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Friday 21 August 2015 11:01:49 Matthias Klose wrote: 1) Immediately binNMU src:kdecoration2 in testing, then when that is done, binNMU src:kwin, src:oxygen and src:breeze all in testing. (that's for release team) this won't work, the GCC 5 in testing is not built using the dual

Re: pkg-kde team meeting at debconf

2015-08-18 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 16 August 2015 19:31:40 Sune Vuorela wrote: Hi Maxy has scheduled a pkg-kde team meeting in Wien (yes. that's a room name) tomorrow monday at 17.00-18.00. My rough notes PKG-KDE TEAM meeting AGENDA Presentation - maxy tells who he is. Talks about his script - Sune talked about

pkg-kde team meeting at debconf

2015-08-16 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi Maxy has scheduled a pkg-kde team meeting in Wien (yes. that's a room name) tomorrow monday at 17.00-18.00. See you there hopefully. /Sune -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: pkg-kde-tools build type debian

2015-05-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 00:30:19 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: On Tuesday 12 May 2015 23:25:18 Sune Vuorela wrote: On Tuesday 12 May 2015 13:04:42 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: * -O2 is removed to let dpkg-buildflags use whatever we decide in Debian should

Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938

2015-04-22 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 14:51:32 Rohan Garg wrote: So far I haven't seen a good reason not to include the patch ( from what I've gathered talking to people on IRC ) It is the other way around. We don't need reasons why not to include things. We need reasons to include it, despite not being

Re: qt4's qtwebkit, phonon and gstreamer [0.10 1.0]

2014-09-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 11 September 2014 16:37:25 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: As you already may know, we have a new qtwebkit version in unstable which is currently FTBFS. This seems to be fixed with the latest patch. But this webkit version links against gstreamer 1.0. We currently have

Re: plans for qtsingleapplication

2013-06-05 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 05 June 2013 02:37:21 Sandro Knauß wrote: Hello, I started packaging owncloud-client [1] and there the question pops up, if there are a plan to put qtsingleapplication and qtlockedfile in seperate packages. codesearch.d.n gives many packages (kudu, qbittorrent, smplayer, ...),

removal of phonon-backend-xine

2012-01-15 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi I think we should remove the xine backend from the archive - it is completely abandoned upstream - it is broken for amarok users - it is buggy - it is installed by default in stable, so users won't automaticalyl get migrated away from it - kde multimedia upstream is getting drowned in

Re: Switching KDE packaging to git

2010-07-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 11 July 2010 19:38:29 Fathi Boudra wrote: Hi, 1) We would use the same workflow as for qt4-x11.git, i.e. no upstream branch. It proved to be fine, didn't it? Fathi, you worked most with qt4-x11.git, is there anything you would like to be changed? nothing to change, I like the

Re: Switch to orig.tar.bz2 dpkg-source format 3.0 (quilt)?

2009-11-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Monday 02 November 2009 19:35:11 Modestas Vainius wrote: Hello, since Debian ftpmasters have made it possible to upload source packages packaged in the next generation formats: 1) I don't see any blockers to use pristine KDE upstream tarballs anymore (renamed to appropriate

Re: metapackage for lokalize

2009-07-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 09 July 2009 08:21:17 Nick Shaforostoff wrote: And your first commit looks good. One thing though, please add a changelog entry. I currently added a dummy entry for you ;) should I somehow communicate my changes to ubuntu? or they are on their own? I think they sync from time

big plans for kde4.3.x ?

2009-07-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! (mail style: brief, but friendly) If any of you have big plans for packaigng changes regarding kde4.3.0, now is the time to speak up with your plans and a timeline for accomplishing it and/or mentioning what help you need from others to accomplish it. Especially plans that requires NEW

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] krecipes and team membership

2009-06-04 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:10:21 Michael Meskes wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:26:57PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: CC'ed -talk to get feedback from others people in the project. For the record, I proposed sponsors requests should be done on -talk mailing list. It's a low traffic

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] krecipes and team membership

2009-06-04 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 04 June 2009 18:29:58 Matthias Julius wrote: How has this matter been handled so far? There are a number of non-DD members here. How do they get their packages uploaded? Do they all have a DD as co-maintainer? It varies, but usually in some way, irc ends up being involved, as I

Re: Bug#526852: diff of the debian directory

2009-05-05 Thread Sune Vuorela
(I'm moving this out of the bug and over to the packagers coordination list pkg-kde-talk@lists.alioth.debian.org, as this is no longer specific to this bug) On Tuesday 05 May 2009 09:42:13 Praveen A wrote: 2009/5/4 Sune Vuorela s...@vuorela.dk: A quick review shows that something python

Re: Bug#526852: diff of the debian directory

2009-05-05 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 12:03:56 Praveen A wrote: 2009/5/5 Sune Vuorela s...@vuorela.dk: Your first steps is to take a look at http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/join.html and create a account on alioth.debian.org and ask for project membership to pkg-kde. I already have an alioth account (I

Re: Bug#523899: Stop providing KDE 3 support

2009-04-13 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Monday 13 April 2009 15:35:08 Ana Guerrero wrote: about -kde is supposed to show it integrated with kde4/qt4 and if that is working (i have not checked), it will be kde3/qt3 and you have to install kdelibs from kde3 that some users might have ride of already. I agree that kde3 integration

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 20:31:04 Rainer Kluge wrote: Ana Guerrero schrieb: - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core longer fits. - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is clearer than kde. The real question is about the need of the

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-06 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 06:49:33 Ana Guerrero wrote: What do you think? What is your proposal here?. do s/kde4/kde/ across meta-kde4 - and maybe make kde-minimal provide kde-core. And maybe rename kde meta package to kde-full. And nothing else. /Sune -- How can I load the bus to the

kde4 in unstable blockers ?

2009-04-03 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! I know Modestas plans to do some debconf warnings in preinst of kdelibs. (can be stolen from virtualbox/lenny) There is also a few issues in kaboom, one related to ktorrent, which I didn't hit. I don't know how serious this is. Any comments? Was the running under nonexistant locale really

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#504109: Bug#504109: please provide a kde4 version of kdebluetooth

2009-03-23 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:10:50 Sune Vuorela wrote: On Tuesday 17 March 2009 11:38:14 Peter Eisentraut wrote: Is anyone working on this? If not, would anyone mind if I prepare this package in the kde-extras SVN for upload to experimental? I'm already a member of pkg-kde

Re: testing kaboom - how to?

2009-03-23 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Monday 16 March 2009 00:18:34 George Kiagiadakis wrote: 2009/3/15 Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com: Hi! I guess we are about a stage now where we need to figure out the exact steps on how to get the kde324 migration app, kaboom, full scale tested across the users of experimental

testing kaboom - how to?

2009-03-15 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! I guess we are about a stage now where we need to figure out the exact steps on how to get the kde324 migration app, kaboom, full scale tested across the users of experimental. First, we need to get a list of remaining issues that we know should get fixed. Then, I think we should upload a

Re: rev 13969 - trunk/packages/kdevplatform/debian

2009-03-04 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:45:27 Jeremy Lainé wrote: Author: sharky Date: 2009-03-04 16:45:27 + (Wed, 04 Mar 2009) New Revision: 13969 Modified: trunk/packages/kdevplatform/debian/control Log: rename kdevplatform to kdevplatform1-libs Thank you very much. /Sune --

library packaging

2009-02-25 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! KDevPlatform has apparantly just been uploaded building the following binary packages: kdevplatform - KDevelop platform for KDE4 kdevplatform-dbg - debugging symbols for the KDevelop platform kdevplatform-dev - development files for the KDevelop platform libsublime-dev - development files

KDE in the transition queue

2009-02-15 Thread Sune Vuorela
(please keep pkg-kde-talk in cc, but no need to keep me) Hi release team! We are as good as ready to push a new and better KDE into unstable at your command. You basically have two choices. Brief and rough or less pain over a longer period of time. The total breakages/pain is expected to be

Re: Uploads to lenny and the $KDEHOME dilemma

2009-02-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 12 February 2009 12:14:02 Ana Guerrero wrote: [1] For what I have understood in this thread, everything should be migrated, and when it is not possible, being ignored. And when it is not correclty migrated it is a bug to report to upstream. That's also my understanding. And ack

Re: Uploads to lenny and the $KDEHOME dilemma

2009-02-04 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 22:53:42 Armin Berres wrote: Hi all! As you all know Lenny is near, which also means that our 4.2 packages will enter Unstable in the very near future. Until today, we still have not decided how to handle KDEHOME. The current situation is, that KDE 3 applications

Re: Need to download KDE 4.1 iso

2009-01-24 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Saturday 24 January 2009 10:56:48 Beojan Stanislaus wrote: On Friday 23 January 2009 22:15:50 Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:10:00 + Beojan Stanislaus beo...@lavabit.com wrote: Kubuntu, the KDE version of Ubuntu, offers KDE4.1 for Intrepid Ibex, but provides a

Re: rev 12740 - branches/kde4.2/packages/kdelibs/debian

2008-12-11 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 11 December 2008 19:24:51 Ana Guerrero wrote: On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:38:41PM +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote: On Thursday 11 December 2008 17:09:10 Ana Guerrero wrote: I do not remember well about this. So question: did not we move this for co-installibility reasons? We

Re: Akonadi and MySQL

2008-08-18 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Monday 18 August 2008 15:20:43 Matthew Rosewarne wrote: There's no way around it: Akonadi needs MySQLd. Nope. The goal is to somehow allow Akonadi to do what it needs to do without requiring the user to mess around with MySQL configuration. The Akonadi service can either start manage

Re: rev 11376 - in branches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian: . patches

2008-07-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:10:01 Ana Guerrero wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:38:11PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: On Monday 07 July 2008 16:54:26 Ana Beatriz Guerrero López wrote: -* ksysguard now depends on ksysguardd. + * ksysguard now recommends on ksysguardd. Modified

away bindings

2008-07-04 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! I'm being away from the internets this weekends. back on sunday. I have been working on the kde4 kdebindings and I wouldn't mind if someone follows up and finishes it while I'm gone ;) /Sune -- Man, how can I insert the attachment? First you must cancel the back-end of the graphic mouse

roadmap for kde4 in lenny?

2008-06-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! This is a attempt to describe what and when to do things to get kde4 in lenny. Middle june: Fix hppa build failure. Sune looking into that. Strip down kde3 kdebase to only contain kde3 specific stuff (kio-plugins and kcontrol). Fedora has some work and Sune is looking into that kde4libs

Re: KDE version in Lenny: KDE 3.5.9 vs KDE 4.1

2008-06-05 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Ana Guerrero wrote: Hi folks, We have been delaying taking a decision about this for too much time now, the freeze is coming up [0], and we need to have it clear, for our users, the release team and the rest of Debian. True. We need to have it clear. Basically we