On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:08:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Woo hoo, my first package in Debian, (hopefully)!
Congratulations!! :-)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask
On Aug 20, 2010, at 10:41 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
(No need to CC me)
On 20/08/10 22:35, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ready for uploading :)
Uploaded.
Woo hoo, my first package in Debian, (hopefully)!
.hc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2010 08:01 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That would make sense if the big tarball wasn't going to change. The
problem is that upstream (me, mostly) is going to stop distributing a
lot of these libraries in the big tarball. Also, as
On 19/08/10 21:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug
On Aug 20, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 21:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at
(No need to CC me)
On 20/08/10 22:35, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ready for uploading :)
Uploaded.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Once pd-motex is in, I am thinking of running one more
thru individually, then once that's done, I'll submit the whole batch.
Does that work?
I'm still not convinced that having one source package for all these
extensions is the best move (as
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler
On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:40:09 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
In this context, I think the above suggestion makes the most sense. So
here's my plan:
- make the LICENSE.txt file into a symlink, if GPL, BSD or other common
license
- make usr/share/doc/pd-motex/README.txt a symlink
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:37:11 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload,
On Aug 17, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:37:11 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;)
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They are
part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the library browser)
looks for them to display them. The library format is basically a
directory with
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They
are part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the library
browser) looks for them to
On 2010-08-17 17:39, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They
this should read: are part of a Pd library
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format.
They are part of the library, and
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt
On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special
args. I'm getting the impression that we are not living up to that
expectation.
You can use them
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:28:05PM -0400, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
Hello,
2010/8/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
2. Release a tarball (with debian subdir stripped)
I just wanted to stress out the fact that the debian directory need to
be out of the upstream tarball. (and repository) It
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special
args. I'm getting the impression
On 16/08/10 14:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 14:30 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 14:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
feedback!
How are you editing debian/changelog? The
On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:03:57 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old!
Ah, oops, I forgot dch. I've been using emacs.
You might want to install the 'dpkg-dev-el' package, which features
debian-changelog-mode. Here, you can easily
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
feedback!
How are you editing
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 23:03:33 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The example should go into /usr/share/doc/pd-motex/examples.
The 'examples' folder is part of the standard library format for Pd
libraries, so it needs to be in the library. A .pd file is something
like a .svg or a .ps:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
levels.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 13:19:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
What's an ABI level?
Sorry.
I shall do my best to never ever again use the term ABI except when I
really really mean it.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper
Hello,
2010/8/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
2. Release a tarball (with debian subdir stripped)
I just wanted to stress out the fact that the debian directory need to
be out of the upstream tarball. (and repository) It took me a few week
to get that part. Once it's done, packaging is a
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 21:31 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
(No need to CC me)
On 14/08/10 17:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with either),
this statement is not true.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:15:26 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it new
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:37:36PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
I would like to chime in and say that with the packages I've worked on
(besides my own), I found that both dh and cdbs get whatever I need
done. I however prefer dh.
I suspect that you (like Benjamin) mean modern short-form
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And this very
strict commitment to stable interfaces and semantics help a lot for
backporting packages.
How does
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:13:52PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:15:26 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:40:08 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
CDBS is more backports-friendly
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
I'm ready to fix whatever needs fixing.
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And this very
On 14/08/10 11:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
[1] or agree to repackage using cdbs - I just won't you to get the
impression that I lured you into this: most people in the multimedia
team are fine with -
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:58:18PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
[1] or agree to repackage using
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:58:18PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
CDBS provides routines to track copyright and licensing info of
sources.
Here's a quick intro
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:40:08 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
I'm ready to fix whatever needs fixing.
THe changelog mentions that it is a non-maintainer upload.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it new arguments, as
you do below.
I honestly tried to not do side-by-side
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with either),
this statement is not true. debhelper requires dpkg-dev = 1.14.19, and
stable has 1.14.29.
--
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
(pd-*). Once I get this one thru the whole process, I'll fix whatever
needs fixing and upload the rest.
Then I'll remove the 'debian' folder from the
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
(pd-*). Once I get this one thru the whole process, I'll fix whatever
needs fixing and
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:26:41PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
(pd-*). Once I get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2010 06:26 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Is git-import-orig preferred over git-import-dsc? I already have the
whole source package.
with git-import-dsc you start from an already packaged deb, whereas with
git-import-orig you start
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 19:44 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:26:41PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I uploaded my first
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I went with git-import-dsc since I've had these packages around for
a while in launchpad. The git-buildpackage tools are much easier, I
wish I'd seen that before :).
Yeah, I felt the same when I found git (compared
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
Ok, I went with git-import-dsc since I've had these packages around
for a while in launchpad. The git-buildpackage tools are much
easier, I wish I'd seen that
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:26:03PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I deleted pd-motex.git and I uploaded it again. My only question is
the debian version is
Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
(pd-*). Once I get this one thru the whole process, I'll fix whatever
needs fixing and upload the rest.
Then I'll remove the 'debian' folder from the upstream SVN so that the
git.debian.org one becomes canonical.
62 matches
Mail list logo
