Re: [PEDA] how does smt work ??

2002-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
One comment: others have well detailed the issues around top and bottom SMT pads. Unmentioned was the fact that a pad can live on any layer, including non-copper layers. This can be useful; I've used it to get pads of a component out of the way when I was using single-pad components to

Re: [PEDA] Tie compoents(Ex: RF footprints)

2002-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:10 PM 2/21/2002 +1100, Ian Wilson wrote: There are a few workarounds. The one that I think is most documentable but sometimes subject to Gerbering issues is the Lomax Virtual Short. Note that Lomax himself now considers as at least equally satisfactory the use of mech layer shorts

Re: [PEDA] Tie compoents(Ex: RF footprints)

2002-02-21 Thread Darryl Newberry
Jeez, you guys do things the hard way, I just use a zero-ohm resistor, it's a standard part available from multiple sources in any size from 0201 up to 2512. This works especially well for maintaining multiple grounds with a single point tie. -Original Message- From: Abd ul-Rahman

Re: [PEDA] how does smt work ??

2002-02-21 Thread Bruce Walter
It is OK to put vias under components - I do it all the time. To deny this is unnecessary, and would produce huge routing constraints. What you need to be aware of, is to not put vias so close to the pad that solder is wicked away from the part pin during reflow. This is typically accomplished

[PEDA] help with a stack ??

2002-02-21 Thread Robison Michael R CNIN
hello, i've got a negative (ECL) and a positive (TTL) power plane on a board i'm doing. right now i'm figuring on a matching ground plane for each power supply, spaced close to the rail for switching capacitance. here's the stack i'm thinking of: critical traces gnd -5.2V noncritical

Re: [PEDA] Tie Components

2002-02-21 Thread Cliff Gerhard
Although they will work just fine in the right applications, beware of zero Ohm resistors in high current and high frequency areas because they are not really 0 Ohms. They have a finite resistance and will dissipate heat. If you use them to bridge a path with significant current, you should

Re: [PEDA] Tie compoents(Ex: RF footprints)

2002-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:23 PM 2/21/2002 -0500, Darryl Newberry wrote: Jeez, you guys do things the hard way, I just use a zero-ohm resistor, it's a standard part available from multiple sources in any size from 0201 up to 2512. This works especially well for maintaining multiple grounds with a single point tie.

Re: [PEDA] BUG??

2002-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:43 PM 2/21/2002 -0500, Watnoski, Michael wrote: I just check and you are correct, except when the display is in transparent mode. In this mode the bottom overlay is always above the bottom copper. In transparent mode, the overlays are transparent. You may not see this if you

Re: [PEDA] help with a stack ??

2002-02-21 Thread HxEngr

Re: [PEDA] Tie Components

2002-02-21 Thread Darryl Newberry
Well by golly you got me there. I deal mostly with low power (3A), speech or FM quality audio, and 100MHz digital IO. When I need an audio or PS ground with a single tie point I use a zerohm resitor. And yes I look at Pd to determine the size. -Original Message- From: Cliff Gerhard

Re: [PEDA] help with a stack ??

2002-02-21 Thread Ted Tontis
Mike, use this stack up non critical gnd critical -5 gnd critical +5 (better if this was ground) non critical or gnd critical non critical power gnd non critical critical gnd (if power switch critical and non critical) two reasons why I say put the critical in the

[PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Ray Mitchell
Hello, Is there any way within Protel 99SE's PCB tool to cause the view to be from the bottom of the board rather than from the front? Thanks, Ray Mitchell * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: *

[PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Bob Jones
Hi All, This is what I've found out while trying to increase the performance of my computer: 1). The file that was causing my processor to have 100% usage all the time was a file called DNETC.EXE, which is located in the c:\windows\sytem directory Bob Jones Digitized Technologies 2 Summit Road

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Grewell, Mel - TNTD- AMPS
Bob, Actually that program only runs when your processor is idle, and therefore doesn't impact Protel. However just in case you aren't aware of what the program is, or recently downloaded it you should check the following url- http://www.distributed.net/ . It appears some bad copies are

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Ian Wilson
On 12:13 PM 21/02/2002 -0800, Ray Mitchell said: Hello, Is there any way within Protel 99SE's PCB tool to cause the view to be from the bottom of the board rather than from the front? Thanks, Ray Mitchell Yes (sort of) http://www.considered.com.au/Protel01.htm#CSFlipViewer Geoff Harland

[PEDA] here we go again - film too small - HELP

2002-02-21 Thread Evan Scarborough
Greetings all, Sorry for the repeat question... I know there was just recently a discussion of this very subject a few weeks ago, but since I had not (yet) run into the problem I skipped over it. I have a 24 inch long flex board to output (very hot job) and I can't get 99se sp6 to output the

Re: [PEDA] help with a stack ??

2002-02-21 Thread Jon Elson
Robison Michael R CNIN wrote: hello, i've got a negative (ECL) and a positive (TTL) power plane on a board i'm doing. right now i'm figuring on a matching ground plane for each power supply, spaced close to the rail for switching capacitance. here's the stack i'm thinking of: critical

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:18 PM 21/02/2002 -0500, Bob Jones said: DNETC.EXE Is a trojan according to a quick search on google. I think you will probably want to do your own research on how to get rid of it. The Symantec AV and the McAfee AV sites would be good starting points. Ian

Re: [PEDA] help with a stack ??

2002-02-21 Thread Brian Sherer
Mike, I've run into trouble by assuming the board house would equalize dielectric thickness in the layer stack. Some do, some don't. I now add a fab note to equalize dielectric thickness +/- 10% to get an approximately known dielectric thickness. Or you can specify the prepreg thickness between

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Mike Ingle
Are you really running w95? I suppose you may have noticed that w2k is the currently preferred base OS for PROTEL. Although who can take a few days off to reintall eberything and get it working. Mike -Original Message- From: Bob Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Tim Hutcheson
Bob, This looks like a part of one of the distributed computing apps like the Seti or United Device Cancer or Antrax project. Perhaps you had been a participant at one time in something like that? regards, Tim Hutcheson Institute for Human and Machine Cognition 40 S. Alcaniz St. Pensacola, FL

Re: [PEDA] RF footprints

2002-02-21 Thread Darren Moore
Hi Randol, Brian G. and others wrote a spiral track generator for Protel. Use that. OOooo!! Where's that?! Does it lock the tracks together so that they don't get independently pulled and the group can be drug together? I've not tried to make a footprint like this, I've just

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Clive . Broome
So the end result is your comp still freezes on text move for 2 seconds on 0805 and 12 secs for SOP? Thats way unacceptable performance. In the table, the big jump is from DRC. Is it disabled using right click/options/preferences/online DRC (unchecked)? Are you using network licenses and

Re: [PEDA] New Question.. Best Practices...

2002-02-21 Thread John Haddy
I have library parts for mounting holes and other hardware (i.e. all PCB features exist on the schematic). A consequence of this is that I can define an M3 mounting hole component that includes a keepout definition. This definition is usually a 360 degree arc on the keepout layer with an

Re: [PEDA] help with a stack ??

2002-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:25 PM 2/21/2002 -0500, Robison Michael R CNIN wrote: hello, i've got a negative (ECL) and a positive (TTL) power plane on a board i'm doing. right now i'm figuring on a matching ground plane for each power supply, spaced close to the rail for switching capacitance. here's the stack i'm

Re: [PEDA] Tie compoents(Ex: RF footprints)

2002-02-21 Thread John Haddy
My alternative for handling tie components would be to allow a flag to attach to copper placed within a library component. The schematic component for a net-tie would have two pins as per usual. Then the PCB component would have two surface pads plus a drawn track or other primitive which has an

[PEDA] SP5 vs SP6 (Ex: results of performance problems)

2002-02-21 Thread Ian Wilson
On 10:00 AM 22/02/2002 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 5. Reinstall Service Pack 5 Then set your licences up again. Or Service Pack 6 - I know that some people have problems with Service Pack 6 but I don't. We have discussed this before but I can't recall the problems that were introduced by

Re: [PEDA] here we go again - film too small - HELP

2002-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:06 PM 2/21/2002 -0800, Evan Scarborough wrote: Greetings all, Sorry for the repeat question... I know there was just recently a discussion of this very subject a few weeks ago, but since I had not (yet) run into the problem I skipped over it. I have a 24 inch long flex board to output

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Dennis Saputelli
yes W95 may not be the prob, but i would say it is time to move on, it may fix things by accident Dennis Saputelli Mike Ingle wrote: Are you really running w95? I suppose you may have noticed that w2k is the currently preferred base OS for PROTEL. Although who can take a few days off to

Re: [PEDA] here we go again - film too small - HELP

2002-02-21 Thread Casey Vanderweide
There is one other way to make this problem go away and simply specify a larger film size in the Advanced tab under Gerber properties, you can change the numbers in the Film Size box to any dimension you want. I have mine set at 20 x 16 inches, as I used to get the film too small message once and

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Geoff Harland
Is there any way within Protel 99SE's PCB tool to cause the view to be from the bottom of the board rather than from the front? Ray Mitchell Yes (sort of) http://www.considered.com.au/Protel01.htm#CSFlipViewer Geoff Harland and I were working on a more difficult server to completely

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Rusty Garfield
At 05:11 PM 2/21/2002 -0500, you wrote: Bob if it is just these two footprints and not others in your libraries try deleting these two parts. They may be corrupted. I vaguely remember having this problem years ago. Delete the parts save and exit Protel. Reenter Protel and try to repair the

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Steve Baldwin
If anyone is interested, it is my belief that an off-line inverting utility could be created Although not the Holy Grail, I think an off-line utility would be a sufficiently useful tool for the majority of my applications. I still use Ian's viewer and find it useful for checking without

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:05 PM 22/02/2002 +1200, Steve Baldwin said: 3) Producing a placement file / drawing for the SMT parts. As far as the SMT guy is concerned, that is the top side of the board. You can already invert the mud-map - we do it all the time. An option in the print setup / print preview setup.

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Darryl Newberry
mud-map LOL! But is this term IPC approved like PWA and PWB? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: *

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Brian Sherer
Geoff, my experience with mirroring layouts (now several years in the past) was so disasterous that I gave it up. Connectivity of all copper objects became completely unreliable, not to say trash. Can 99SE/SP6 in fact mirror layouts and retain connectivity? Or are you referring to mirroring as

Re: [PEDA] RF footprints

2002-02-21 Thread Brian Guralnick
Don't forget my Smooth Transition track size generator. Open this link in your internet explorer: ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/ProtelUsers/ SmoothTrackSizeTransitionProtel.bas Free Others: InductorGeneratorProtelScript.bas - Generates continuous 'S' shaped inductors.

Re: [PEDA] PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-21 Thread Geoff Harland
Geoff, my experience with mirroring layouts (now several years in the past) was so disasterous that I gave it up. Connectivity of all copper objects became completely unreliable, not to say trash. Can 99SE/SP6 in fact mirror layouts and retain connectivity? Or are you referring to mirroring