Re: [PEDA] Test points

2004-06-03 Thread Tom Reineking
Thanks Ian for the information. I was concerned about the grid also. I'll add the testpoint component to the schematics which will give me more flexibility. Thanks again. Tom Ian Wilson wrote: On 08:06 AM 3/06/2004, Tom Reineking said: .. 4 hours later ... Just got my post back and I did

[PEDA] Test points

2004-06-02 Thread Tom Reineking
I have a fairly complex BGA design that requires via tenting, at least on the component side. The PCB assembly will not go through wave solder, so no problem with the solder side. There are two problems I have run into. The first is tenting on one side. I checked the KB and only DXP and up

Re: [PEDA] Test points

2004-06-02 Thread Tom Reineking
.. 4 hours later ... Just got my post back and I did find an answer to the report part concerning nets without testpoints. The design rule Testpoint Usage does generate violations for those nets and therefore a report can be generated. There is also a document on the Protel web site in the

Re: [PEDA] Test points

2004-06-02 Thread Ian Wilson
On 08:06 AM 3/06/2004, Tom Reineking said: .. 4 hours later ... Just got my post back and I did find an answer to the report part concerning nets without testpoints. The design rule Testpoint Usage does generate violations for those nets and therefore a report can be generated. There is also

[PEDA] Test Message

2004-04-13 Thread Adeel Malik
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: *

[PEDA] Test - Is the PEDA Forum operational?

2004-01-14 Thread JaMi Smith
I have not received any posts for several days now, and I am wondering if Forum Traffic is just down, of if we have hit another operational snag . . . JaMi * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: *

Re: [PEDA] Test - Is the PEDA Forum operational?

2004-01-14 Thread Joe Sapienza
Traffic seems down - Original Message - From: JaMi Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: JaMi Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:24 PM Subject: [PEDA] Test - Is the PEDA Forum operational? I have not received any posts for several

Re: [PEDA] Test - Is the PEDA Forum operational?

2004-01-14 Thread Steve Smith
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com www.stacopower.com -Original Message- From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:24 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Cc: JaMi Smith Subject: [PEDA] Test - Is the PEDA Forum operational? I have

[PEDA] TEST

2003-10-21 Thread JaMi Smith
TEST * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: *

[PEDA] Test

2003-10-21 Thread JaMi Smith
Are we back yet? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: *

[PEDA] Test email post to list

2003-07-07 Thread John Ross
Sorry for the useless post, but i think my mail list account has got screwed up somehow as I have not been able to post to this list for the past few days, with no errors back from techserv servers. But I can still receive posts to the list. Very strange So we will see if this email gets

[PEDA] Test

2002-12-20 Thread JaMi Smith
Test * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: *

[PEDA] Test

2002-12-11 Thread Tim Fifield
Please ignore. This is a test. Tim Fifield * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * *

Re: [PEDA] test

2002-08-28 Thread Richard Sumner
I haven't received any PEDA mail in several days, and the DXP has slowed to a trickle. So please ignore this minor annoyance (I may not even get it!). thanks, Richard Cheesecote Mountain CAMAC, 24 Halley Drive; Pomona, NY 10970 voice: 845 364 0211, fax: 845 362 6947, www.cmcamac.com

[PEDA] test message - ignore

2002-06-01 Thread Melvin Stevens

[PEDA] Test point Pad Size

2002-03-12 Thread Tim Fifield
Can anybody tell me what the recommended test point pad size to be used with the GenRAD GR228xi in circuit tester is? I think were using a combo II board. Our manufacturing dept. wants me to use a 100 thou diameter pad which seems quite excessive to me. I currently have a 35 thou pad. Tim

Re: [PEDA] Test point Pad Size

2002-03-12 Thread Bob Wolfe
Subject: [PEDA] Test point Pad Size Can anybody tell me what the recommended test point pad size to be used with the GenRAD GR228xi in circuit tester is? I think were using a combo II board. Our manufacturing dept. wants me to use a 100 thou diameter pad which seems quite excessive to me. I

[PEDA] TEST - newly registered account does not receive it's own posts.

2002-03-11 Thread Brian Guralnick
Hi, I just re-joined this forum under a new e-mail address. I don't seem to be receiving back my posts like my old e-mail address does. If I remember correctly, there was a setting, or code which need to be sent to techservinc to enable the feature. Does anyone know what it is?

Re: [PEDA] TEST - newly registered account does not receive it's own posts.

2002-03-11 Thread Brian Guralnick
Subject: [PEDA] TEST - newly registered account does not receive it's own posts. | Hi, | | I just re-joined this forum under a new e-mail address. I don't seem to be | receiving back my posts like my old e-mail address does. If I remember correctly, | there was a setting, or code which need

Re: [PEDA] TEST - newly registered account does not receive it's own posts.

2002-03-11 Thread Peter Bennett
Brian Guralnick wrote: Forget it, everything is now OK. Thanks to the Admin. Brian Guralnick please not the change in email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe there is a speeling erorr in your .sig. -- Peter Bennett TRIUMF 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada

[PEDA] Test

2002-02-12 Thread Tim Fifield
This is a test. Please ignore Tim * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum

[PEDA] test

2002-01-14 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Abdulrahman Lomax Easthampton, Massachusetts USA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: *

[PEDA] Test

2002-01-14 Thread Tim Fifield
This is a test, as I have not received mail from the group in two days. Tim Fifield * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list

Re: [PEDA] Test #2, Is this message getting through?

2001-12-13 Thread Rene Tschaggelar
You should consider another newsreader. Strange ones such as OE may hide your own posts. Rene Brian Guralnick wrote: Test #2, Is this message getting through? My last 3 posts are missing. Brian Guralnick * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

[PEDA] Test...

2001-12-12 Thread Brian Guralnick
Just checking. Some of my messages didn't seem to get through today. Brian Guralnick * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * *

[PEDA] Test #2, Is this message getting through?

2001-12-12 Thread Brian Guralnick
Test #2, Is this message getting through? My last 3 posts are missing. Brian Guralnick * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html *

[PEDA] test - please delete

2001-11-20 Thread Stephen Casey
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: *

Re: [PEDA] Test

2001-10-23 Thread Tony Karavidas
I'm curious why it take 15 or more hours sometimes to get an email distributed on this list? I sent emails yesterday evening that are just showing up today. (and one of them still hasn't made it yet) Tony * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message:

Re: [PEDA] Test

2001-10-23 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:50 AM 10/23/01 -0700, Tony Karavidas wrote: I'm curious why it take 15 or more hours sometimes to get an email distributed on this list? I sent emails yesterday evening that are just showing up today. (and one of them still hasn't made it yet) My posts usually show up in a few minutes, so,

[PEDA] test points

2001-10-01 Thread Brad Marshall
Hello, I have a design that is completed, all routed, and the engineer has decided he wants test points on every net on the bottom side. Is there an easy way of doing this besides by hand from net to net? Thanks, Brad Marshall * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Steve Smith
Yes Steve Smith -Original Message- From: Ted Tontis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PM To: Protel Forum (E-mail) Subject: [PEDA] test could someone let me know if my messages are getting out? Thank you, Ted Tontis C.I.D. Engage

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread HxEngr

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Roger McLain
I read you 10 by 10. -Original Message- From: Ted Tontis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Protel Forum (E-mail) Subject: [PEDA] test could someone let me know if my messages are getting out? Thank you, Ted Tontis C.I.D. Engage Networks 316 N

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Ted Tontis
]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:49 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] test In a message dated 9/6/01 1:42:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: could someone let me know if my messages are getting out? Well, this one got out to me. But I just got one

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Jim McGrath
Hi All, At the risk of being cut from this very Important list I recieved this messege from the forum Administrator (a warning to you all): Subject: Off Topic Discussions Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 10:01:02 -0700 From: Forum Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:48 PM 9/6/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, this one got out to me. But I just got one of the bounce messages that I've seen from several users today. It seems TechServ has a problem at their end. Sure would hate to get unsubscribed - this list has been a lifeline at times. Since

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
On 02:22 PM 6/09/2001 -0700, Jim McGrath said: Hi All, At the risk of being cut from this very Important list I recieved this messege from the forum Administrator (a warning to you all): You won't get cut from the list as if you did you would email a regular user direct and they would let

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
On 02:30 PM 6/09/2001 -0400, Brian Guralnick said: My posts no longer echo back to me, is anyone receiving this? Brian Guralnick I seem to recall that this has happened before. I have a theory on what has happened but I don't think I will go into it. There is an option to turn

[PEDA] Test, Please ignore

2001-08-17 Thread Edi Im Hof
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * - or email - * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum * * Contact the

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-30 Thread Schattke, Carl
control for each side of the board, since you only need access from one side, not both. Carl -Original Message- From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:27 AM To: 'Protel EDA Forum' Subject: Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP carl, have

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-30 Thread Geoff Harland
Joel, Clicking Testpoint just marks it as a testpoint for output, but does not even automatically untent the via. So it would allow you to have soldermask on a test point. Hum, they might complain about that in the test department. Seems the only solution/work around is create

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-28 Thread Joel Hammer
Ext. 26 www.e2enterprises.com -Original Message- From: Schattke, Carl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:36 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP Hello, Has anyone figured out a work around so test points

[PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Schattke, Carl
Hello, Has anyone figured out a work around so test points will only be exposed on the tested side and tented on the untested side (like under fine pitch SMT components)? Editing the Gerber's is the only way I know to do this now. :( I would prefer something that be reproducible after

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Mike Reagan
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:35 PM Subject: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP Hello, Has anyone figured out a work around so test points will only be exposed on the tested side and tented on the untested side (like under fine pitch SMT components)? Editing

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Reed Woltering
The way I do this is to simply plot the soldermask for the side with the testpoints normally, and then select the testpoints, and edit the soldermask expansion for them to be negative, (ex: 30 mil TP gets -15mil expansion) and plot the opposite side to bury them in the mask. Reed Woltering

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Schattke, Carl
to the soldermask pads on the top and bottom. Carl -Original Message- From: Reed Woltering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:34 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP The way I do this is to simply plot the soldermask for the side

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Reed Woltering
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:34 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP The way I do this is to simply plot the soldermask for the side with the testpoints normally, and then select the testpoints, and edit the soldermask expansion

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:29 PM 7/27/01 -0700, Schattke, Carl wrote: I have test points on both sides due to the high density of the product. I am using vias for test points in some locations, so if I give them a negative expansion then I will be covering my testpoints with mask. Making parts for each

Re: [PEDA] Test point tenting on side opposite TP

2001-07-27 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:39 PM 27/07/2001 -0700, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said: Then make a solder mask expansion design rule to tent the pad for each class as desired. Top and bottom masks can be subject to different design rules by adding layer scope as the second term in the rule selection criteria. Restricting

[PEDA] test

2001-05-07 Thread Jim Mcgrath
Same here Ian, I want my bouce back. Jim * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To join or leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html * - or email - * mailto:[EMAIL

[PEDA] test

2001-05-07 Thread Michael Reynolds