Hi, I got the OK to be listed in Happy Users list.
Company name is Tuenti, url: http://tuenti.com
Regards,
Julia
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Thanks Julia! I've added it to our list, using the description on the front
page. Let me know if you'd like me to change anything.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:31
We've been using reviewboard for a while now and had no problems with
upgrading several times.
We're running it on a windows server using apache 2.2 and mysql 5.5.
But now I try to upgrade our 1.5.6 installation to 1.6 I get several
database issues.
'rb-site upgrade reviewboard' gives the
Hi Martin,
The #sql- tables are generated internally by MySQL. Do you know if you're
using InnoDB or MyISAM on the database?
From a Google search, it seems that there may be several causes for this.
It's basically a very misleading error message, and seems to vary on
configuration.
What version
The windows server runs MySQL v5.5.10 using InnoDB storage engine.
But now that I looked at the tables in the windows server's
reviewboard db I see they're using MyISAM storage engine.
The test server runs MySQL 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 with storage engine unset,
so defaulting to MyISAM.
Here the tables
Problem solved!
I switched all existing reviewboard tables to storage engine InnoDB
and the upgrade went fine.
Can only imagine the problem was the engine mix of old tables (MyISAM)
and newly created tables (InnoDB).
Thanks for your help and keep up the great work!
Regards,
Martin
--
Want to
I'm pretty sure I tried that (restarting memcached), but I can try
again.
Do you know if the sorting occurs when posting the review to the
database, or only when viewing the diff? That is, once I've commented
out sort calls and restarted memcached, would I need to re-post the
diff file or would
I did the following
in /etc/selinux/config SELINUX=disabled
and restarted the system. It still didn't help. I did get a different,
yet similar error. This time it wasn't complaining that etdlab (my
login) didn't have permission. It was complaining that apache did
not have permission to
Hi,
I investigate more on this problem, and it sounds RB is totally unusable on
subdirectory installation (« http://forge/reviews/ » in my case).
« WSGIScriptAlias » parameter must not finish with a « / », otherwise WSGI
concatenate URL-path part to the WSGI script path (leading to « Target
I'm in a bit of a bind. Administration for Reviewboard at work has
fallen to me after the previous administrator (and installer) left
with well intentioned but insufficient documentation.
My first problem, I'm looking to upgrade from 1.0 to 1.5 / 1.6 in
order to get email notifications, however I
On Sep 9, 3:35 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Can you attach that backends.py file? Something seems very fishy.
I'm using a customized backends.py file. Maybe it's incompatible with
1.6? I successfully set up a 1.5 installation several months ago
using the same configuration.
Hi Christian,
snip my backends.py file
After sending you my backends file, I decided to start with the
default backends.py file and then added the additional classes that I
needed for theActiveDirectoryGroupMembershipSSLBackend
authentication. Then I ran rb-site upgrade and I get a login
On Sep 12, 11:09 am, Steve seide.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
snip my backends.py file
After sending you my backends file, I decided to start with the
default backends.py file and then added the additional classes that I
needed for theActiveDirectoryGroupMembershipSSLBackend
Hi,
What version exactly is this? Almost sounds like a pre-1.0.
Before you do anything, back up the site directory and database. Things
could get hairy.
Can you describe to me the steps you're doing to upgrade? setup.cfg
shouldn't come into play unless you're dealing with a source tree.
I'm
Great :)
Best thing to do if you need customizations is to create a brand new Python
package for your backend and subclass one of ours, modifying functions as
needed. The whole way backends work changed in 1.6.
See our Code Base Docs for a link to a guide on custom auth backends.
Christian
On
Excellent! Glad it's working :)
Christian
On Monday, September 12, 2011, M. Exner ex...@dps-online.de wrote:
Problem solved!
I switched all existing reviewboard tables to storage engine InnoDB
and the upgrade went fine.
Can only imagine the problem was the engine mix of old tables (MyISAM)
We were running 1.5.6 and since the upgrade to 1.6 (and now 1.6.1) we
are having issues with the API causing the post-review script to fail.
I searched for anyone having the same issue but didn't find anything.
HTTP GETting api/
HTTP GETting https://reviews.example.com/api/info/
Got API Error
Is there documentation on how to set this up with post-commit or pre-
commit hooks where a user can't push changes into the repository
unless the changeset has been reviewed and approved?
I'm using git as our repo and so far I've gotten as far as being able
to use post-review to submit a review
I noticed this on a new install and am working on a fix.
For now, specify --username= and --password= on the command line for the
first post, and it should at least generate the cookie file so you won't hit
this again.
Can you file a bug?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
There's nothing we provide, as it varies quite a bit between installs,
repository types, etc.
Right now anything you do requires a fair bit of custom code. We're working
on a formal Python API for Review Board, which will make this easier from a
development standpoint.
From a workflow
Okay, to make yourself a superuser, do:
$ rb-site manage /path/to/site shell
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
user = User.objects.get(username=your username)
user.is_superuser = True
user.save()
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review
Actually, I believe it is at upload time. So new diffs should be fine.
diffviewer/forms.py would be the place to look.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:50 AM, SCFrench
The Python API or even a Restful call to the reviewboard would be
nice. Then I could probably call reviewboard from a curl and check on
the changeset status. For instance this is my git log:
--- SNIPPET ---
commit 08c36a414d56a7e1db26bfd7f5fabe2cb9d0aff7
Author: james
I'm having significant problems getting LDAP authentication to work.
First, my problem, then a few suggestions to make this all go a bit
easier. My set up is the following:
Review board 1.6.1
LDAP server: ldap://loaclhost:389
LDAP Base DN: ou=People,dc=domain,dc=com
Given Name Attribute:
Sounds great, unfortunately first I need to get me an rb-site tool :)
I've scoured the machine where RB is installed and the closest I have
is an rb-site.txt describing it's use. But the tool is nowhere to be
found.
On Sep 12, 8:03 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Okay, to make
Hi,
rb-site is provided by the ReviewBoard package, which you should install by
doing easy_install -U ReviewBoard.
You shouldn't need to touch the tatballs. I don't know why it was angry
about setup.py, but perhaps it's just too old.
Best way to back up the database is by doing an SQL dump.
No, not necessarily. When you post a diff, it generates a squashed diff,
whichay mean the SHA1 will differ. We also just have no mechanism today to
look up a review request by this sort of info.
Christian
On Monday, September 12, 2011, james james.ngu...@gmail.com wrote:
The Python API or even
On Sep 12, 12:35 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
No, not necessarily. When you post a diff, it generates a squashed diff,
whichay mean the SHA1 will differ.
Ah. Got it.
We also just have no mechanism today to
look up a review request by this sort of info.
Yeah. This was
Some more information,
I removed cn as the Full Name Attribute and mail as the Email LDAP
Attribute and auth now works (mostly) correctly. Which means that the
givenName / sn fields were retrieved correctly, but the cn / mail
attributes were not. I would like these attributes to be read,
I don't know how many users on this list are familiar with OpenShift.
This is a Red Hat-sponsored cloud service providing virtual
applications.
One of the popular applications selected for use as a demonstration of
the power of OpenShift was ReviewBoard. I'd like to describe for you
what I now
Hey Stephen,
Looks like an interesting project. I'll have to look into it more.
However, I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't say that the absolute
easiest way to get Review Board, with full support from us, is to use our
new hosting service, RBCommons (http://www.rbcommons.com) ;)
Christian
I'm including --username and --password when this error occurs. The
cookie file is created but only with the comments and no cookie
information.
Yes, I will create a bug report.
On Sep 12, 11:57 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I noticed this on a new install and am working on a
Oh, absolutely! OpenShift Express doesn't come with application support (and
very limited platform support in the free version).
I'm not trying to compete with rbcommons!
Mostly I thought it might prove interesting to those admins having setup
troubles (especially on Windows)
On Sep 12, 2011
I did an upgrade from pre-1.0 SVN to 1.5.5. The instructions are in a
previous post:
http://goo.gl/KFIiT
Your steps will be a little different because you are using
easy_install. And you might not have the missing table issue I had.
easy_install is generally easy to get:
Red Hat-based: yum
No that's great that you linked to it :) I just felt like taking the
opportunity to mention RBCommons ;)
Anything to help get people set up is helpful. On machines that RB supports
well, it's easy, but yeah, Windows and other Linux distros can be a real
pain.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
Mostly I thought it might prove interesting to those admins having setup
troubles (especially on Windows)
Yeah, this should be a big help to people trying to run Django apps
without Linux experiences. I'm pretty
For the first time, I installed RB. I installed RB 1.6 on Linux and
got The page you were looking for does not exist. when I hit the
home page. I can see the Review Board 1.6 header and some links.
Something like this.
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2279 by kofem...@googlemail.com: 1.6.1 started to return
redirected url instead of configured server name
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2279
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2280 by robert.munteanu: API: failure to update review request:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280
What version are you running?
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Support
Comment #1 on issue 2280 by chip...@gmail.com: API: failure to update
review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no
attribute 'startswith'
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280
Are
Comment #3 on issue 2279 by chip...@gmail.com: 1.6.1 started to return
redirected url instead of configured server name
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2279
Looks like this was part of the set of fixes in Django 1.3.1 for the
security vulnerabilities. See the info at:
Comment #4 on issue 2279 by kofem...@googlemail.com: 1.6.1 started to
return redirected url instead of configured server name
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2279
Thanks. As we reverted back to 1.6 I will do a second attempt to upgrade
tomorrow.
--
You received this
Comment by jonathan...@gmail.com:
In the pre-commit use case, I'd like to be able to use ReviewBoard to
commit the change to SVN for me. That closes the loop of:
Whoops, the developer accidentally committed something that they shouldn't
have
i.e. what was reviewed is actually what is
Comment #2 on issue 2280 by robert.munteanu: API: failure to update review
request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280
I am posting using the ereviewboard plugin for Eclipse. After setting
the
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #3 on issue 2280 by chip...@gmail.com: API: failure to update
review request: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no
attribute 'startswith'
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2280
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2281 by mwhite...@wordstream.com: /api/info requested before login
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2281
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2282 by pankrato...@gmail.com: Open an issue checkboxes missing
on Review Dialog page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2282
*NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to
47 matches
Mail list logo
