I'm having more trouble getting LDAP authentication.
I'll admit up front, I'm working with a web server where dedicating a
portion of apache just to review board was not possible. I had to
append the rules to the default site, at the directory root/reviews.
This is a hard requirement.
I am also
Hi Christian,
I had created 'servers' file in in site path (
/var/www/project.com/data/.subversion/servers )
$ls -al
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7666 2011-09-23 12:40 servers
Server file has below entries under [global] group
[global]
# http-proxy-exceptions = *.exception.com, www.internal-site.org
Anton, you're correct, I'm using the SLES 11 SP1 Apache pretty much out of
the box (but with the PHP, Python, Perl and Env modules enabled) and those
settings came from apache2ctl (an alias for httpd?) -S -M . Sorry,
Christian, should've been clearer about where they came from.
Anton, I've moved
Okay, so I have a shiny, new, *working*,* *instance of Reviewboard 1.6.1.
and my plan to migrate my data from my old site was to run rb-site upgrade
on the old site and then copy the newly upgraded database to the new site.
Unfortunately, the database still seem to have a certain amount of 1.0ness
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 15:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote:
Switched with --console
rb-site --console install /var/www/mysite1
* Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard
This will prepare a Review Board
By the way, the old site used an SQLite backend. I was going to get access
to the legacy code reviews by having an SQLite site alongside the production
MySQL site that we'll use going forwards. I notice that We don’t *
officially* support converting a database from SQLite to other databases.
How
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 12:02 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Pretty sure, yes. For most people, it's just a few commands. The
problem you're hitting is that you're trying to perform a custom
Python install, instead of using native distro packages. So you're
doing far too much by hand, instead
Hi,
Does yum install pysvn work for you? if this works, it should take
care of all the dependencies. I tried the same and it installed pysvn
withough any issues.
-sanjay
On Sep 13, 12:40 pm, Monica Sanchez castaneda.mon...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have the configuration below,
Fedora 2.6
Hi Sandeep,
What manual updates did it show? There are several possible pages beyond
database-related updates.
Unofficially, you can do the following:
On the old site: rb-site manage /path/to/site dumpdata dbdump.json
On the new: . loaddata dbdump.json
There are no guarantees it'll work,
Hi Vijay,
Can you verify that, on that same server, you're able to perform a svn
checkout of your repository from another user?
(Also, you'll want to chown that servers file so Apache can write to it.)
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -
Glad you figured that out. I'm making sure these settings will be added for
new sites in 1.6.2+.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Sandeep Tailor
I recently switched from cvs to git. Our procedure with ReviewBoard
with git is now similar to what we were doing before: commit changes,
do a git pull, then create a diff of the unpushed changes with git
diff FETCH_HEAD..HEAD, then push the changes. Very frequently, when
I try to upload such a
How is Review Board set up with that repository? Is it using a local clone?
If so, you have to have something set up so that the clone is always
up-to-date, or you'll hit errors like this.
I generally recommend setting up something like cgit on the repository and
then using that as the Raw File
The Review Board repository path setting is the (bare) git
repository that is our upstream repository to which we push our
changes. I can see the sha1s that Review Board is complaining about
in that repository, so they do exist there.
On Sep 23, 5:19 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com
Ah okay.
How did you generate/upload the diff?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Paul Lynch plynch...@gmail.com wrote:
The Review Board repository path setting
git diff FETCH_HEAD..HEAD
(before the push). After that a push was done, and then I tried to
upload the file. I have also done a pull in another clone of the
repository, and can see the files there too.
Uploading was done through the Review Board web site (now at 1.6.1)
using the New Review
So off-hand, I don't know why you're hitting this, but let's just run
through a couple more things.
During upload time, when we go to verify a file's existence, we run:
git --git-dir=repo path cat-file -t revision
If you run that on your bare repo, does that still work? What do you see?
If
It works, but if my current working directory is not in a git
repository, I also get a fatal error, after which it outputs the
type. For example:
git --git-dir=/proj/git/def.git cat-file -t febdf30
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
blob
(But not that it does
I wouldn't expect it to need to be in that directory. We do look for a
fatal: but only for Not a valid object name. However, it's very likely
that the error code is when you execute that isn't 0, so we're failing.
So for that repo, if you're in /proj/git/def.git, it works?
What version of git is
Yes. I tried cd'ing to that /proj/git/def.git, and the fatal error
message went away.
$ git --version
git version 1.7.0.4
On Sep 23, 6:24 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I wouldn't expect it to need to be in that directory. We do look for a
fatal: but only for Not a valid
It does seem that the error status is 0:
git --git-dir=/proj/git/def.git cat-file -t febdf30
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
blob
echo $?
0
I just notice an odd thing, though. I logged into two other systems
that can see that repository (we have it mounted
Just a follow up. It does seem that what I described below was the
problem.
The solution was to move the repository to our Office B, where
development is done. Now that the Perforce server is on the same LAN,
with the same DNS resolution as the reviewboard server, I was able to
install without
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2304 by eddiehor...@gmail.com: [Page not found] after upgrade to
1.6.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2304
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need
Updates:
Owner: chip...@gmail.com
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High Component-Deployment
Comment #1 on issue 2304 by chip...@gmail.com: [Page not found] after
upgrade to 1.6.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2304
Nothing significant changed between
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 2304 by chip...@gmail.com: [Page not found] after
upgrade to 1.6.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2304
Try changing your Apache config so that ScriptAlias goes from:
WSGIScriptAlias /p4reviewboard/
Comment #5 on issue 2155 by chip...@gmail.com: post-review fails to upload
diff if non-ascii characters are used in diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2155
Issue 2300 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 2155
Comment #2 on issue 2300 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.3.3 not work with
python2.7
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2300
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: chip...@gmail.com
Labels: Milestone-RBTools-Release1.0 Component-RBTools
Comment #6 on issue 2155 by chip...@gmail.com: post-review fails to upload
diff if non-ascii characters are used in diff
Comment #3 on issue 2304 by eddiehor...@gmail.com: [Page not found] after
upgrade to 1.6.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2304
Thanks your prompt response.
I'm using mod_python, and later now I found a workaround by set the site at
host root direction (in conf,
Comment #4 on issue 2304 by chip...@gmail.com: [Page not found] after
upgrade to 1.6.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2304
It's possible they changed something that broke mod_python in Django 1.3.1.
For the heck of it, try downgrading Django to 1.3.0 and see if it
Comment #5 on issue 2304 by eddiehor...@gmail.com: [Page not found] after
upgrade to 1.6.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2304
I removed Django 1.3.1 and installed 1.3, but still don't fix.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 2177 by trowb...@gmail.com: git branch is not used
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2177
Fixed in master (feeddca). Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 1227 by trowb...@gmail.com: Data lost when resizing
comment box in IE8
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1227
I think this is fixed now.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #3 on issue 2290 by trowb...@gmail.com: Adding Group for review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2290
It is optional.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post
Comment #29 on issue 489 by mike.d.c...@gmail.com: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489
How about instead of Ship It, Don't Ship It, we use +1 / 0 / -1?
Examples:
I've just finished reviewing some code, and I feel it's not exactly ready
for the
Updates:
Status: UserError
Comment #1 on issue 1909 by trowb...@gmail.com: Information passed from
post-review to RB does not show up in draft
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1909
The only way this can happen is if you're not logged in on the web UI...
--
You
Updates:
Status: New
Comment #5 on issue 1722 by trowb...@gmail.com: UTF-16 file from Perforce
not displayed
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1722
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
37 matches
Mail list logo
