Re: RBTools 0.5.4 questions

-- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for a detailed response. > > One question on UUID - why can't it be cached in RB's database

Re: RBTools 0.5.4 questions

Hi Chris, Thanks for a detailed response. One question on UUID - why can't it be cached in RB's database at the time of repository setup, instead of being queried from Subversion servers for each 'rbt post' as you described? On .reviewboardrc, this approach would work if the checked-out module

Re: RBTools 0.5.4 questions

Hi Alexey, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Hi David, > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:27:32 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote: > >> Alexey, >> >> Responses inline >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: >> >>> 1. When I tried to invoke post-review (

Re: RBTools 0.5.4 questions

Hi David, On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:27:32 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Alexey, > > Responses inline > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Alexey Neyman > > > wrote: > >> 1. When I tried to invoke post-review (yes, I still have to use that - >> see the second question as to "why") o

Re: RBTools 0.5.4 is released

I just put out a 0.5.5 release that adds a missing commit for the repository matching fixes for Subversion, and introduces --svn-show-copies-as-adds to post-review. Give it a try! - Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - ht

Re: RBTools 0.5.4 questions

Alexey, Responses inline On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > 1. When I tried to invoke post-review (yes, I still have to use that - see > the second question as to "why") on a working copy which had some files > renamed, it printed the following message: > > One or more files

RBTools 0.5.4 questions

Hi, I've just upgraded RBTools to 0.5.4, and have a couple of questions: 1. When I tried to invoke post-review (yes, I still have to use that - see the second question as to "why") on a working copy which had some files renamed, it printed the following message: One or more files in your chang

Review Board Power Pack General Availability

Hello everyone, It's release day! In addition to the new RBTools and Review Board releases, we'd like to announce general availability for the Review Board Power Pack. The Power Pack is a commercial add-on for Review Board which adds document (PDF) review, support for GitHub Enterprise, and suppo

Review Board 1.7.21 is released

Hey everyone, One release for the day just isn't enough. We just released Review Board 1.7.21. It adds support for GitLab and Unfuddle, fixes a number of bugs, adds some API improvements, and introduces a large optimization for large diffs. See the news announcement for more details: http://www.

Re: How to set ip address instead of the string localhost on email body

It works :-). I was afraid to brake my db again -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message bec

Re: How to set ip address instead of the string localhost on email body

This was the purpose of the site domain name. Go to the General Settings page and set the domain there. It will update the Site entry. You may have to reload Apache after doing this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - ht

How to set ip address instead of the string localhost on email body

I added USE_X_FORWARDED_HOST = True to settings_local.py, and I was expecting to see this http://10.34.51.33/r/1/ instead of http://localhost/r/1/ in the email body. Any idea how to make such change? Regards, -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboar

RBTools 0.5.4 is released

Hi everyone, We just put out RBTools 0.5.4. It has some bug fixes for rbt patch, revision ranges with Git, and name-based repository lookups with Subversion. The news post has more details at: http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/01/14/rbtools-0-5-4-released/ We're gearing up for a couple Revie

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Looks like perhaps it was unable to write to the current directory as your user. The real error was masked by a bug in setup-repo, which I'll get fixed for the release. Name-based lookups are a different issue. I hope to have a release within the next few hours. Trying to write out the release not

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Scratch that. It went successfully as root. Perhaps a permission issue? On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 3:35:33 PM UTC-5, Zachary Gallagher wrote: > > Ah... The bases weren't added. It was sub-directories. That was the > problem. I added the base path, and re-tried 'rbt setup-repo --debug' and > go

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Ah... The bases weren't added. It was sub-directories. That was the problem. I added the base path, and re-tried 'rbt setup-repo --debug' and got farther. Now, you mentioned name-based lookup with Subversion. Is this the currently expected outcome? - Create '/dfs/*UserDirectory/CheckoutFol

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Hi Zachary, /api/repositories/ should not be empty so long as you've added more or more repository configurations in Review Board and your user has access to them. It's totally fine if a single server is hosting multiple SVN repositories. Make sure to add the base of each repository (not a subdir

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Also, and I feel I may be abusing this opportunity to ask a third question: Is there still a problem I should expect if a single server is hosting multiple svn repositories? Or was that just an older version. I"m looking for documentation for it, but it's not coming to me easily. On Tuesday, Ja

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

That being said, http://ReviewBoardServer/api/repositories *is* empty. And I am given the impression that it shouldn't be. Was this something that was dropped. I'm using RB 1.7.16. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting a

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Oh, well that's better. I'm a novice sysadmin, so I'm never sure how much of any given problem is a "real" problem, and how much is because I left off the trailing / or something. Thanks for the response! On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:40:43 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Zachary, >

Re: Missing authentication options

Hi Rob, Sounds like the Python Entrypoints we use to register the list of auth backends (and other things) may have gone missing. That or your Python modules for handling Active Directory, NIS and LDAP are missing. Most likely, the upgrade broke something. You can try re-installing the version of

Re: RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

Hi Zachary, It's trying to find a match based on the result of 'svn info'. If it can't find a repository entry on Review Board that has a Path or Mirror Path matching your local checkout, then it'll fail. This is a new tool, and we probably should improve it in this case. What I'd recommend is cr

Missing authentication options

Hi, I wonder if anyone else has had this experience or can offer any assistance ? Over the weekend, the CentOS server I was running ReviewBoard (v1.7.16) on under lighttpd was powered off and rebooted. It was previously configured to use ActiveDirectory authentication which worked perfectly.

RB Tools issue with repositories. RB Tools not GETing the repositories linked on our reviewboard server.

I navigate to a subversion checkout. I run rbt setup-repo --debug. This is what I get. There are four repositories linked on our reviewboard server, but they're not hosted on the same machine. How do I get this to work? I'm sure it's something blatant that I've missed. [root@*workstation **ch

Re: "[Errno -5] No address associated with hostname" When using ReviewBoard with Atlassian Stash

Thank you for the assistance. I tried using the HTTPS URL, but I had to encode both the username and password into the URL: just having the username, or nothing, and filling in the Username/Password fields below gave a "No Repository" error. I didn't feel comfortable having a password visible i

Re: Email notifications not sent when review comments are added.

The log contents are as follows "Jan 13 04:02:14 pls-reviewbrdsc sendmail[26138]: s0D92DOj026138: from=root, size=2056, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<201401130902.s0d92doj026...@pls-reviewbrdsc.isus.emc.com>, relay=root@localhost Jan 13 04:02:14 pls-reviewbrdsc sendmail[26138]: s0D92DOj026138: to=r