if that can be done - You could default everything to a specific user
instead of 'Nobody'; that's essentially the same thing as 'Nobody' though.
Hope this helps!
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun
Have any of you created or had experience with a scrip where when the 'take'
action is triggered, the current users ID automatically adds a predefined
comment such as We have received your request, it will be acted on within the
next 24-48 hours.
Thanks for the help,
Kris Germann
Fibernetics
with template Transaction
Condition: On Transaction
Action: Extract Subject Tag
Template: Global Template: Transaction
Stage: Transaction Create
With no luck.
Has anyone had any success with this?
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
freephoneline.ca
605 Boxwood Drive
I am trying to lay things out plain and simple, and am wondering if I can make
a custom scrip to automatically place text in the subject line or body of a
ticket when a ticket is created in a particular queue.
Anyone have any insight?
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
to get rid of that (no value)?
Thanks
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
Thank you Ruslan, this is exactly what I'm looking for.
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
freephoneline.ca
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
-Original Message-
From: ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com [mailto:ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com] On Behalf
be waiting a while now and needs immediate
support - Is there a way I could configure my queue-specific scrips to move
tickets from Support: General - L1 3 days old to Support: General - L2
Escalations, and so on for Support: General - L3 Escalations ?
Help is greatly appreciated.
Kris Germann
http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Andy GOKTAS
Sent: Friday
, but is there a
way to tell what this query does (how many tickets are 3 days), but also
tell me how old they actually are?
Thanks
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
possible way for someone to open a ticket would
force ownership?
Kris Germann
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
Crocker
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 2:55 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt
It is extreme, yes. We'll see how it works out.
Thanks,
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
Crocker
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:50 PM
To: rt-users
,
Let me know if you can,
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
E, Queue G
Type: ticket
Refers-To: {$Tickets{'TOP'}-Id()}
Content: {$Transaction-Content}
ENDOFCONTENT
Thanks
Kris Germann
Fibernetics Corporation
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kris Germann
Sent
Does anybody know if this is even possible?
When you set a ticket status to 'rejected' that it automatically add a
condition to block that email address permanently?
Getting a lot of spam of late .
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
Requestors: Requestor Email
Status: Status
Ticket URL: URL
This transaction appears to have no content
Or is this not what you are doing.
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
freephoneline.ca
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
From
Also make sure you have RT-Attach-Message: yes and {$Transaction-Content()}
set.
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
freephoneline.ca
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Falcone
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:24 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] search by CommentedOnBy?
On Mon, Jan 03,
know our Ivan relationship is 'complex'
-kevin
- Forwarded message from Kris Germann kris_germ...@295.ca -
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 08:32:21 -0500
From: Kris Germann kris_germ...@295.ca
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] search by CommentedOnBy?
X-Mailer
. for a specific user, or for all users chronologically.
Thanks
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
freephoneline.ca
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
Hey guys,
I'm wondering if there is a way to limit the number of users who show up
when bulk-updating tickets to only the RT defined users, instead of now
where it shows not only those users, but also everyone who has emailed
in. I know this is used to allow people access to email RT but
Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
On 10-12-02 09:59 AM, Kevin Falcone wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:05:31AM -0500, Kris Germann wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a way to limit the number of users who show up
when bulk-updating
tickets
If I'm not mistaken you'll have to start by rebuilding the perl modules..
Ie. make perl-modules, make install-perl-modules, than run edit the toplevel
Makefile set RT_External=0, RT_Internal=1, make config, and so on...
Kris
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
605
ON, N3E1A5
On 11/11/2010 01:57 PM, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:45:49AM -0500, Kris Germann wrote:
Is there a way to show a mandatory custom field ONLY when the ticket
is first created?
There is something like this in RT todo list ...
http://issues.bestpractical.com/Ticket
Is there a way to show a mandatory custom field ONLY when the ticket is
first created?
I want people to enter phone numbers and dates of technical issues,
however now they are being asked to enter them again when resolving the
ticket, which really there is no point to since it's recorded
?
Kris
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corporation
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge ON, N3E1A5
On 11/11/2010 10:45 AM, Kris Germann wrote:
Is there a way to show a mandatory custom field ONLY when the ticket
is first created?
I want people to enter phone numbers and dates
Ruslan,
Thank you, I've also forgot to mention that I'd like to keep the way the
content of the custom field displays in the transaction body with 'ticket
transactions' I may be wishing too much but who knows...
Kris Germann
Supervisor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corp
Sent
Hey guys,
So I'm having a bit of trouble here...
I'm trying to create a scrip to run, which is whenever a ticket is
created for a specific queue, there is already text in the content
window (like there is when you have a signature).
My scrip is:
Condition: On Create
Action: Create Tickets
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Kris Germann kris_germ...@295.ca
mailto:kris_germ...@295.ca wrote:
Hey guys,
So I'm having a bit of trouble here...
I'm trying to create a scrip to run, which is whenever a ticket is
created for a specific queue, there is already text in the content
Here's where I got my info from, but some clarification would be nice:
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/WorkFlow
Kris
On 11/03/2010 09:12 PM, Kris Germann wrote:
Evening everyone,
I have a few questions that I hope you can answer,
I have created a custom field labelled 'Send to:', where
Look up.
The subject tag is what appears in the subject of an outgoing email -
similar to [rt-users] except it would have your ticket number in place.
{$Ticket-id}] is the exact string I believe.
If your rtname was set to Company A, all outgoing emails including
autoreplies would show up as
I completely misinterpreted your question, Ruslans' answer is what you
need ;)
Kris
On 11/04/2010 05:18 PM, Kris Germann wrote:
Look up.
The subject tag is what appears in the subject of an outgoing email -
similar to [rt-users] except it would have your ticket number in place.
{$Ticket
Evening everyone,
I have a few questions that I hope you can answer,
I have created a custom field labelled 'Send to:', where there is a drop
down list naming several queues.
What I'm wondering is when I select a queue from the custom field (Send
To:) and update the ticket, if it could then
Hey guys,
So, I defined PreferRichText to allow HTML messages through RT when
customers email from their Outlook clients or similar which use
recursive HTML formatting unless otherwise specified.
Unfortunately, RT is pretty vague on how certain flags are set so I'm
just blindly stumbling
Hey guys,
So, I defined PreferRichText to allow HTML messages through RT when
customers email from their Outlook clients or similar which use
recursive HTML formatting unless otherwise specified.
Unfortunately, RT is pretty vague on how certain flags are set so I'm
just blindly stumbling
to change undef to 1 and voila, now HTML works on
incoming correspondence!...
No size formatting though, guess I can live without it.
Kris
Mentor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corp
605 Boxwood Drive
Cambridge, ON N3E1A5
On 10/26/2010 03:07 PM, Kris Germann wrote:
Hey guys,
So, I
Howard,
I'm looking to tweak our internal RT process so that internal users can
'claim' a ticket directly from the e-mail notification, to avoid having
two people working on one issue (we have a group of people who are all
watchers on the General queue, and those people generally work from
I actually requested this as well, it would be incredibly useful.
I've tried making a scrip for making any correspondence extract subject tag of
the email (to RT) and move to ticket TITLE but no luck...
Kris Germann
Mentor, Sales Technical Support
Fibernetics Corp
Sent wirelessly from my
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:38:33
To: kris_germ...@295.ca
Cc: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com; Andrew
Bestfesti...@gmail.com; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Update Ticket Subject on Comment/Reply
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Kris Germann kris_germ...@295.ca
I'm wondering if this is something I should be capable of doing, however
right now it eludes me.
For standard requests which have common subjects, for example, Subject:
CUSTOMER NAME - PHONE NUMBER
I'm attempting to write a scrip which then enables us to replace
ticket's subject with the
39 matches
Mail list logo