),
but it's still important to fix it.
Are you sure its wise to give people so little time to upgrade for what
appears to be a minor fix?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: i...@freenetproject.org
___
Support mailing list
Support
a little time to understand
what is being debated before they start ranting.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, SenseArray
Email: i...@sensearray.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Ray Jones crawlz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:11 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
It would be really helpful if people could spend a little time to
understand what is being debated before they start ranting.
Try again. I subscribed to this list
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Ray Jones crawlz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:57 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
And this is the problem. If you admit that you don't understand the
issues then why express any opinion at all until you do?
Because as I began learning about
running on its current port for those that
prefer it.
So anti-Javascript luddites like you will be free to remain in the dark ages
if you want to ;-P
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, SenseArray
Email: i...@sensearray.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
___
Support mailing
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
7th May, 2009 - Another big donation!
How about: Google makes a second donation to Freenet!
Everything else looks good.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: i...@uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1
ward this message on to any other relevant forums (such as
> > on-Freenet message boards).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ian.
> >
> > --
> > Ian Clarke
> > CEO, Uprizer Labs
> > Email: ian at uprizer.com
> > Ph: +1 512
, but if you can spare anything I'd ask that you visit
our donation page at http://freenetproject.org/donate.html, and contribute
whatever you can.
Please also forward this message on to any other relevant forums (such as
on-Freenet message boards).
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
, but if you can spare anything I'd ask that you visit
our donation page at http://freenetproject.org/donate.html, and contribute
whatever you can.
Please also forward this message on to any other relevant forums (such as
on-Freenet message boards).
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: i...@uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
stage.
You should look into GWT for this.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
for the next stage.
You should look into GWT for this.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: i...@uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
s someone in Belgium, Canada, or some other French-speaking
country that doesn't suffer from France's legal stupidity around P2P.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
Ian.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Don Lee wrote:
> The installer should not attempt an install if there's a serious problem.
>
> I don't see a fix for this and I've
Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
Ian.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Don Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The installer should not attempt an install if there's a serious problem.
I don't see a fix for this
allow small groups to connect without connecting to
> everyone else.
That is not true. Freenet 0.7 is designed to form one global
network, not multiple independent networks consisting of small groups.
Ian.
Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | p
without connecting toeveryone else. That is not true. Freenet 0.7 is designed to form one global network, not multiple independent networks consisting of small groups.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really
doesn't belong here.
Ian.
Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
&l
first world war.
Ian.
Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/2006
. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really doesn't belong here.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___
Support mailing list
Support
On 4 Apr 2006, at 21:12, Joel Salomon wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Joel Salomon wrote:
>>> What build did you see this in?
>>
>> How do I tell?
>
> Never mind, I found it -- #616.
Yeah, I think it was fixed in 620.
Ian.
Bug reports belong in the bug tracking system :-)
http://bugs.freenetproject.org/
What build did you see this in? I think this one was supposed to
have been fixed about 12 hours ago.
Ian.
On 4 Apr 2006, at 20:04, Joel Salomon wrote:
Bug report:
On occasion,
On 4 Apr 2006, at 21:12, Joel Salomon wrote:
On 4/5/06, Joel Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What build did you see this in?
How do I tell?
Never mind, I found it -- #616.
Yeah, I think it was fixed in 620.
Ian.
___
Support mailing list
Ok, the announcement text is looking good, but still needs more
feedback, so please check it out:
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/ZeroPointSevenAnnouncementDraft
The plan is to send this to the announcement mailing list, and add it
to the news section of the website, probably mid-afternoon
On 4/1/06, van2 at vipmail.hu wrote:
> I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
> disk access.
I don't think disk drives wear out that quickly, and lots of software
writes to the disk constantly. That being said, the default log level
in testnet Freenet is
On 4/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
disk access.
I don't think disk drives wear out that quickly, and lots of software
writes to the disk constantly. That being said, the default log level
in testnet
On 31 Mar 2006, at 20:08, John Meeks wrote:
> This isn't about *technical* support, I just wanted to tell Matthew
> thanks
> for working on this project. The US government is really scaring
> me and
> I'm glad someone's working on this. You're doing a great job man.
>
> One question I have
On 31 Mar 2006, at 20:08, John Meeks wrote:
This isn't about *technical* support, I just wanted to tell Matthew
thanks
for working on this project. The US government is really scaring
me and
I'm glad someone's working on this. You're doing a great job man.
One question I have is that the
There are instructions for unsubscribing at the bottom of every email.
Ian.
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:41, Tony Stevens wrote:
>
> For God's Sake Man - FREENET is all about Privacy! There must be
> some way in hell that you can take me off of the mailing list?
>
> Please I am tired of
There are instructions for unsubscribing at the bottom of every email.
Ian.
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:41, Tony Stevens wrote:
For God's Sake Man - FREENET is all about Privacy! There must be
some way in hell that you can take me off of the mailing list?
Please I am tired of being
Sorry Dick, but I don't have time to solve your problems either -
certainly not when you inform me about them in such a rude way.
In future, you might find when reporting bugs to people that you get
a better response if you don't insult them in the process.
Ian.
On 25 Feb 2006, at 09:14,
Sorry Dick, but I don't have time to solve your problems either -
certainly not when you inform me about them in such a rude way.
In future, you might find when reporting bugs to people that you get
a better response if you don't insult them in the process.
Ian.
On 25 Feb 2006, at 09:14,
On 17 Feb 2006, at 22:51, Greg Steffenson wrote:
> In what way is Tor centralized? I was under the
> impression that your traffic was routed through a
> largely random sequence of Tor servers... is there
> some communication with a central server in addition
> to that?
Who gives you the list of
I just filed bug #8:
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=8
We should distribute files from emu now that sourceforge is
deliberately limiting the speed of download from their web servers.
To avoid any bandwidth crunch, we should link through Coral Cache
(see http://coralcdn.com/).
On 23 Oct 2005, at 18:38, m0rtal frei wrote:
> Hello Ian,
>
> Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
>> download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
>> this but haven't got around to it yet.
I just filed bug #8:
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=8
We should distribute files from emu now that sourceforge is
deliberately limiting the speed of download from their web servers.
To avoid any bandwidth crunch, we should link through Coral Cache
(see
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
this but haven't got around to it yet.
Apologies for the inconvenience,
Ian.
On 22 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Kevin Bennett wrote:
> Trying to update to the latest
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the
download of large files from their web servers. We need to address
this but haven't got around to it yet.
Apologies for the inconvenience,
Ian.
On 22 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Kevin Bennett wrote:
Trying to update to the latest
You should be able to remove Freenet through the Add/Remove Programs
part of the Control Panel, Freenet will be one of the items listed
there.
A more crude way to remove it would be to delete the C:\Program Files
\Freenet folder from your hard disk, although the first option is
better.
You should be able to remove Freenet through the Add/Remove Programs
part of the Control Panel, Freenet will be one of the items listed
there.
A more crude way to remove it would be to delete the C:\Program Files
\Freenet folder from your hard disk, although the first option is
better.
Hi Steve,
Sorry you are having problems, we still have a number of usability
issues to work out. One of these is that if you are using Safari,
due to a page rendering bug, the link to the upload client is
obscured, but you can find it here:
http://revver.com/downloadClient/
This issue
Hi Steve,Sorry you are having problems, we still have a number of usability issues to work out. One of these is that if you are using Safari, due to a page rendering bug, the link to the upload client is obscured, but you can find it here: http://revver.com/downloadClient/This issue is in our
Pre-mix routing will be introduced after 0.7, but will not be
supported in 0.7.0 (the first release in the 0.7 series). It will
likely be implemented once the initial 0.7 releases are stable.
Ian.
On 3 Oct 2005, at 14:01, Duana Saskia STANLEY wrote:
>
> I am 90% sure it doesn't and that
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>>> Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
>>>> "clusters o
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>> On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Which reduces "globally scalable darknet" to "clusters of dark
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>> On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>> It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a
>>> pure
>>
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure
> darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to have
> something for people to download from freenetproject.org.
I see no reason for there to be a separate
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a
pure
darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is
clusters of isolated dark nodes, which is worse?
There would
Here is the response I sent separately:
I didn't discover the Opera problem, but the general issue is that
Freenet can't send data to a web browser unless it knows what the web
browser will do with it, otherwise the web browser could do something
that would compromise your anonymity (such
On 29 Dec 2004, at 22:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I tried going to dodo.freenetproject.org and was greeted by
Placeholder for lawtracker.org website
What's lawtracker.org ?
Its a project I started which, unfortunately, hasn't yet got off the
ground.
As was pointed out by someone
On 1 Dec 2004, at 10:05, Newsbyte wrote:
Now, may I ask you if you feel I have helped/supported you with my
posts? I
ask that, because I just got emailed by Ian saying he kicked me out of
the
project (well, at least he disabled my freenetproject account)
I wasn't aware that you were ever in the
I am glad that you are happy, but what relevance does this have to the
Freenet support mailing list?
Ian.
On 26 Nov 2004, at 13:47, Michael wrote:
I jumped the Freenet ship over a month ago and swam to the easy safety
of Entropy. Maybe not all the content but hey, it works and works and
On 10 Nov 2004, at 07:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
also i have a website with losta files and stuff and it is in BT
but i am worried about getting tracked and caught so i am trying to
make this switch... so i need to know how to seed to... if someone
has a step by step
On 8 Nov 2004, at 10:59, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
After that, it's relatively smooth sailing. Add the following lines to
/etc/yum.conf:
[freenet]
name=Freenet
baseurl=http://nightwatch.mine.nu/freenet/stable/
gpgcheck=0
I had no idea someone had done this - we should link to this from the
main
If you want to ask me a question then send me an email, what relevance
does this have to the support mailing list?
But for your future reference, forging the from headers in emails is
trivially easy and that is what this virus has obviously done, most
viruses do.
Ian.
On 4 Nov 2004, at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Aug 2004, at 23:37, Toad wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:38:01AM +0200, Daniel Dreschers wrote:
I tried updateing Freenet to 5092 this morning.
After downloading the webinstaller with the update function, my
anti-virus program (McAfee
This discussion is now continuing on the chat mailing list as it is not
really appropriate for support. Please post any further follow-ups
there.
Ian.
On 6 Aug 2004, at 15:29, vinyl1 wrote:
I suggest we not give Mr. Findley a hard time. He is an honorable
guy, and is telling us what the law
On 5 Aug 2004, at 04:42, Matthew Findley wrote:
Let me put it this way.
When you all fire up your nodes you know there is a very strong
likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting illegal
material, correct?
So you know your computer will be doing something illegal and yet
choose to
On 4 Aug 2004, at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
As for the uploader
Willful blindness can not protect you if it can be shown that you had
a reasonable suspicion to believe they you are committing a crime. In
fact in some cases a deliberate attempt to not obtain knowledge is
proof of that
On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:11, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:22:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As for the uploader
Willful blindness can not protect you if it can be shown that you had
a reasonable suspicion to believe they you are committing a crime.
In fact in some cases a
On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet.
Shaky logic. Nothing is forcing postmen to work for the USPS, yet if
it were to be found that a postman had unknowingly transported drugs it
is unlikely that they could successfully
On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my
reading of the Induce Act, Freenet would *probably* be safe as none of
its features are expressly intended to allow people
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:00, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet.
Shaky logic. Nothing is forcing postmen to work for the USPS, yet if
it were to be found that a postman had unknowingly transported drugs
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:38, Toad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:02:33AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my
reading of the Induce Act, Freenet
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:39, Toad wrote:
The problem is that ignorance is indeed a goal in itself on Freenet.
It's part of its very basic design features.
Same is true of the postal system (otherwise they would mandate that
everything is written on postcards).
Ian.
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:43, Toad wrote:
Which feature of Freenet is *intended* to toward the efforts of
copyright holders to enforce copyright law?
All of Freenet is intended to thwart those who want to eliminate
content
on Freenet, and eliminate the contributors and requestors of that
content.
Not
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:48, Toad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:44:37AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:39, Toad wrote:
The problem is that ignorance is indeed a goal in itself on Freenet.
It's part of its very basic design features.
Same is true of the postal system (otherwise
Toad wrote:
To obtain best performance from this build, you will need to update your
freenet-ext.jar. Shut down the node, download the new freenet-ext.jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-ext.jar , copy it over
your existing freenet-ext.jar, and then restart the node.
Note that
Newsbyte wrote:
Tried it out, and thusfar...it's crap.
Can you read? If so, please apply your reading skills to Matthew's
announcement of the new build, particularly this part:
There may be a readjustment period on the network for a while as people
upgrade and the network sorts itself out. Your
Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:38:25AM +0100, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks
and array overflows had we implemented in C++). As for focus, our
rant
You are living in a dream world, really.
No, you
Toad wrote:
JIT Java (which we're all running) is also very speedy, there's only a few
rare instances where it's worth the trouble to replace code with something
natively instead.
Debatable. But most of the problems with Java come from the fact that it
is non-free IMHO. If and when freenet
That is a shame. Clearly I don't agree with your reasoning, there is no
evidence that any other language would not have similar or worse issues
(consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks
and array overflows had we implemented in C++). As for focus, our
experimental
Roger Oksanen wrote:
Tunneling packets in UDP when both hosts are behind NAT has the
following problems:
* Generic NAT tunneling implementations don't work; They require
that one host is on a routable address.
Not true in 85% of cases, most NATs will forward UDP packets that come
from a host
Yep, I phoned them up and they wouldn't give me any reason beyond use
of anonymizing proxy, but did point out that according to their Terms
of Service, they don't need one.
This is extremely annoying because we lose the numerous monthly
subscriptions that people had signed up for, hopefully
Getting Freenet working on OSX is pretty straight-forward provided you
are comfortable using a command line. Basically you just need to follow
the instructions for Linux.
We could certainly use someone willing to package Freenet up nicely such
that it can be installed and used on OSX without
I'm afraid I can't, you need to cancel your subscription through PayPal.
Kind regards,
Ian.
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:13, Anjan Bacchu(J) wrote:
Subscription Name: Freenet Project Membership
Subscription Number: S-6G704031JR625064Y
Thank you,
I will at a later opportunity try to become
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 04:03, Steven wrote:
After recently being It appears to be running my node properly, but I
am still unable to get Fred working. Whenever I go to
http://127.0.0.1:/ I get a 500 error. Any idea what the problem
might be?
Ensure that Freenet is stopped, and delete your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of
| DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread,
| and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd
| want a real FCP
Does this mean that Freenet now compiles and runs with GCJ?
Ian.
Niklas Bergh wrote:
Committed to unstable CVS.
I found the problem.
this patch should be applied to stable in order to be able to compile it
with gcj.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
You need to remove yourself by logging into your paypal account and
canceling the subscription. Contact Paypal support if you need help
with this.
Once you have done this I am happy to refund whatever you did not intend
to donate.
Ian.
Stefano Santoro wrote:
Hi,
please take me off
Toad wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
Did you send the email from the same email address you used to subscribe?
Ian.
Victor Denisov wrote:
Hello,
I've subcribed to the tech mailing list, received a confirmation and then (a
couple of hours later) sent an e-mail to it.
Contrary to my expectations, I've received a reply telling me
Brandon Low wrote:
I have e-mailed a thread dump to 2 good devs,
Awww, why not let the evil devs have a go at it too?
;-)
Ian.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Um, thanks for the pessimism I guess.
Some of us are working very hard to figure out how to address the
problems we are seeing, but I guess others just want to benefit from
this research project without accepting the risks. Fortunately, most
seem to accept that sometimes, when you are on the
I have received no-such request that I can recall.
You can cancel payment at any time through the Paypal web interface. I
suggest you contact Paypal customer support if you do not know how to do
this.
Ian.
Matt wrote:
I am very upset because the donation that I submitted to your
Hi All. Time for one of my regular progress reports:
Next Generation Routing is in, and we are working feverishly to weed out
the bugs, and coax it into working nicely. The process is challenging
as often the effects of changes cannot be seen for several days, but we
are making progress. We
S wrote:
Question 1:
When I point my Macintosh (using Safari) at freenetproject.org, I am
redirected to http://de-co.info/freenet/ which is the Japanese Freenet
page. My Windows and FreeBSD machines, at the same IP address, wind up
at the normal English Freenet page. I have seen this issue
The Babbler wrote:
I would suggest instead changing the test to a check for supporting 'ja' and
*not* supporting 'en'. That way if some other browser says that it can
support a variety of languages, it would work right by default as well. Eg,
Done. Try it now.
Ian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed, a
redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are more
prominently displayed.
We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and there are serious
problems with it - not least
Troed Sångberg wrote:
You asked what is needed for general acceptance of Freenet, I replied.
And I disagreed.
I've advocated Freenet for a long time along my peers (I'm a
professional Software Engineer, specialising in crypto/security issues)
- and trying to get people to visit links to
this code is still
rather new, we do not want the publicity that normally accompanies such
a release. Please respect our wishes by not submitting this news to
high-traffic websites - we need to save that publicity for the 0.6
release which we are now working toward.
Kind regards,
Ian Clarke
Freenet
exception actually not appear in
freenet.log (as shown by View Logfile) ?
d
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us
about how up-to-date you want to be.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage http://locut.us
/listinfo/chat/
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage http://locut.us
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal
mail through? You will need to allow relay from
hawk.freenetproject.org (4.46.23.40).
Contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage
Final release has been delayed to Wednesday,
Unless you hear otherwise from me, final release has not been delayed.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage
on this?
I use Sun's 1.4.1 JRE exclusively and have experienced no problems on
any of the platforms on which I use it.
To my knowledge, there is no firm evidence that Sun's 1.4 JVM is causing
any problems.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
