Re: [SM 2.3.3, Win7] Odd UI behaviour opening e-mail folders, and newsgroups, as tabs.

Daniel wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I'm on a Win7 Ultimate with SP1 system. My SM 2.3.3 is the pushed update to SM 2.3.2 which was downloaded and applied over an SM 2.0.14 system. I have no add-ons. My email/news display is set up to have a folder pane on the left and a messages pa

[SM2.3.3, Win7] View dropdown menu UI improvement ?

I'm on a Win7 Ultimate with SP1 system. My SM 2.3.3 is the pushed update to SM 2.3.2 which was downloaded and applied over an SM 2.0.14 system. I have no add-ons. On the third menu bar on the email screen there is a dropdown menu box called "View:" . When one clicks on the triangle in the box, in

[SM 2.3.3, Win7] Go Back and Go Forward arrows on the SM menu.

I'm on a Win7 Ultimate with SP1 system. My SM 2.3.3 is the pushed update to SM 2.3.2 which was downloaded and applied over an SM 2.0.14 system. I have no add-ons. On the second menu bar across the top of the email screen. The one starting with 'get msgs', in the third section, there appear two ic

[SM 2.3.3, Win7] Hung alert when Sending messages?

I'm on a Win7 Ultimate with SP1 system. My SM 2.3.3 is the pushed update to SM 2.3.2 which was downloaded and applied over an SM 2.0.14 system. I have no add-ons. Sometimes, like earlier this evening, when I send a message, SM will first put up an alert that it is sending the message, and then a

[SM 2.3.3, Win7] Odd UI behaviour opening e-mail folders, and newsgroups, as tabs.

I'm on a Win7 Ultimate with SP1 system. My SM 2.3.3 is the pushed update to SM 2.3.2 which was downloaded and applied over an SM 2.0.14 system. I have no add-ons. My email/news display is set up to have a folder pane on the left and a messages pane on the right. The message reading area has been

What is the current status of SM upgrade/patch to 2.3.3 ?

This is probably for Mr. Callek. ?! You promised us an automatic (push type) upgrade patch to get to SM 2.3.3 (from ???). - I am on a WIN 7 system and was on SM 2.3.1. - I started getting an alert that the system wanted to run updater.exe from Mozilla when I started SM. - Well I allowed the upd

Re: newsgroup posting ...

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:06:39 -0400, /km/: ... this may be stoopid but i'll never know unless i ask. are there any special privileges that pertain to newsgroup posting. i know html is allowed but are there NY OTHER 'THINGS' THAT MIGHT SPRUCE UP MY POATA HTML is allowed

2.3.1. Problem displaying email headers in tabs

SM 2.3.1 on Win 7. I am trying compare possibly duplicate email messages by displaying them in side by side tabs. Here in detail is what I am doing: 1) I open the folder containing the suspect messages X , Y 2) I set header display to normal 3) I flag and tag X, so that it will stand out when I d

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.2 Release -- Corrects Major Security Flaw

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: SeaMonkey 2.3.2 is now available as free downloads for Windows, Mac, and Linux from http://www.seamonkey-project.org. As always, we recommend that users keep up to date with the latest stability and support versions of SeaMonkey, and encourage all our users to upgrade

Question about 2.0.14 -> 2.3.1 upgrade.

I'm on a 64bit WIN 7 Ultimate system. I just downloaded the SM 2.3.1 program binary from www.seamonky-project.org and ran the installer exe. (after a full backup of the profile and program folders) The installer ran in a flash, and now I'm supposedly at SM 2.3.1 But I'm curious and just a bit appr

Re: SM 2.0.10 - Google images problem

chicagofan wrote: Last year Google enabled users of their search page to use images on the search page. I have never been able to use this feature. Is this a problem with the SM Google access... or something else? The link for this option never shows up as Google said it would, and searching arou

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement here. The surroundings have alre

Re: OT was Re: Stylish in 2.2

Daniel wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: David E. Ross a écrit : AMO = addons.mozilla.org D'oh! I'm an idiot! Thank you! S. Could calling yourself names like that get you barred from here?? Well there is this newsgroup policeman with his finger on the kill switch. So you never know. __

Re: Email messages delete slow in 2.3

bern...@nospam.com wrote: I just noticed something odd. My computer updated Seamonkey form 2.2 to 2.3 After the update, when I delete email, it seems to delay about 3 seconds for every email on the list I delete if I delete 1 at a time. I highlight a message, click delete, and there is a 3 secon

Re: New Seamonkey, new bug

JD wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Mike wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: What I found instead was that the dialogue box was not fully visible (see screenshot) -- You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it. Though I agree the default view should

Re: New Seamonkey, new bug

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Mike wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: What I found instead was that the dialogue box was not fully visible (see screenshot) -- You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it. Though I agree the default view should be more in

Re: New Seamonkey, new bug

Mike wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: What I found instead was that the dialogue box was not fully visible (see screenshot) -- You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it. Though I agree the default view should be more intuitive. Either make it obvious in some way

Re: New Seamonkey, new bug

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: On restarting Seamonkey a few minutes ago, I was informed that it was installing my updates, then checking my plug-ins for compatibility, then asked if I wanted it to be my default client for e-mail, and finally launched. All looked promising, but rather d

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3 Beta 3 Release -- New Features and Fixes

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/16/2011 5:38 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it del

Re: 2 issues with Seamonky 2.2

Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-08-15 1:31 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: But of course with 2.3 almost here, bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 or upgrade there-to will not be addressed. Bullshit! The bug fixes will just be included in future releases. That is

Re: 2 issues with Seamonky 2.2

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: But of course with 2.3 almost here, bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 or upgrade there-to will not be addressed. Bullshit! The bug fixes will just be included in future releases. That is, if good bug fixes are found - for this bookmark importing problem

Re: 2 issues with Seamonky 2.2

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 13/08/2011 14:43, Juiceman told the world: Its when I click the bookmark button I just get the new style bookmark manager, but my saved bookmark list dosnt show. OK. IF you have upgraded directly from 2.0.x to 2.2 (that is, if you wasn't using 2.1 previou

Re: Hotmail and 2.0.14

Tom Pamin wrote: Tom Pamin wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 11/08/2011 17:48, Tom Pamin told the world: Hotmail is now asking me to upgrade my browser every time I log in. I already modified my about:config in order to get Yahoo Mail to work, by adding Firefox/3.0 after general.use

Re: Radical change in topic. Now a newsreader Q. was (Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: The link you provide above takes me to a google groups login page. All my tries to retrieve previous articles by clicking on Message-IDs or the numbers assigned them in the References

Re: Radical change in topic. Now a newsreader Q. was (Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-08-11 12:37 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Looking at this posting, I see that there was a follow up posting by PhillipJones to my cynical posting "I wish I could writhe ... ... pooper scooper brigade". But

Re: Radical change in topic. Now a newsreader Q. was (Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-08-11 12:37 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Looking at this posting, I see that there was a follow up posting by PhillipJones to my cynical posting "I wish I could writhe ... ... pooper scooper brigade". But I can not find PhillipJoness' posting at Mozill

Radical change in topic. Now a newsreader Q. was (Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 09/08/2011 21:18, Rufus told the world: ...it was a suggestion for a *new* SM product from the *SM* team because someone posed a question - and not even that particular product

Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 09/08/2011 21:18, Rufus told the world: ...it was a suggestion for a *new* SM product from the *SM* team because someone posed a question - and not even that particular product, it's an *example*...crap, can't anybody around here think *conceptually*? ...

Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: What's relevant is not their naming but their frequency and buggines! Right, and SeaMonkey matches Firefox both in frequency as well as mostly in how few bugs it has, though SeaMonkey tends to have a bit more of those than Firefox rec

Re: new 2.3

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 07/08/2011 21:29, Paul B. Gallagher told the world: MCBastos wrote: But, the thing is, with limited resources available, supporting those old releases means that the new release does not receive as much work as it needs. With Seamonkey tied to the every-si

Re: new 2.3

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WLS wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I'm only saying what I've read here from authoritative sources; the only addition is my judgment "half-baked," which reflects many of the opinions voiced here. If you don't like it, speak to the merits of the argument. You need not

Re: new 2.3

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:29:22 -0400, /Paul B. Gallagher/: As our parents used to ask, "If everyone else jumped off a cliff, would you do it, too?" Just because the FF people decided to rush things and churn out a series of half-baked products for

Re: new 2.3

WLS wrote: The Mozilla Foundation is leading the development of a better Internet. http://www.mozilla.org/about/mission.html http://www.mozilla.org/about/manifesto By its' own claims and pronouncements! Just because you don't like it, don't spread misinformation. ___

Re: new 2.3

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: MCBastos wrote: But, the thing is, with limited resources available, supporting those old releases means that the new release does not receive as much work as it needs. With Seamonkey tied to the every-six-weeks Mozilla release schedule, delaying release is not an optio

Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

Robert Kaiser wrote: PhillipJones schrieb: The original post meant SeaMonkey. It didn't. FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever. SM increments their major updates by .1's 2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on. That is just a different numbering system, the rate and size of updates is very similar.

Re: new 2.3

Robert Kaiser wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb: Unfortunately, from a user perspective, major change is rarely welcome, whilst increased security and incremental bug fixes are universally appreciated. Right, that's why the major change the web brought to computers was never appr

Re: new 2.3

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: What is the definition that you are using of 'progress'? Is it only new features or wrinkles in the UI, or can it be eradication of existing bugs and misguided UI feature implementations? Both, even simplifying UI counts as that - at

Re: new 2.3

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: > Bill Davidsen schrieb: >> Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle that >> often, and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not >> suitable for business use. > > Actually, Mozilla is t

Re: Getting closer...

dev wrote: Now if SM only supported ALL the extensions that work in FF I could use it exclusively. ^_^ How about , 'If SM only had support?' and not just experimental development? or should that be , 'developmental experiments :-\ ' ?. ___ support-se

Re: winXP loses majority share

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Mike wrote: > XP users have a little under three years left. > Plenty of time to save pennies for some tech. It is a depressing thought. Can there really be life after XP ? Oh sure :-) MS Windows 8 has even been pre-announced. :-) _

Re: SM 2.2 - don't like new search bar in mail/mews

Philip Chee wrote: On 05/08/2011 02:31, Gerry Hickman wrote: Hi, I've just updated to SM 2.2, in the mail and news window there's a new tool bar called the "search bar" that takes up quite a lot of room. In the old 2.0, the search boxes were part of the message list pane and were very compact,

Re: new 2.3

Robert Kaiser wrote: Pat Connors schrieb: Now we have 2.3 and more complaints. Why more complaints? And 2.3 is still in beta, but beta 2 actually fixes some issues that have been reported with 2.2 here... Robert Kaiser On balance, Has the number of known bugs and annoyances increased, or d

Re: Seamonkey 2.2 e-mail client : where has right=click "Paste as quotation" gone ?

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: JD wrote: > Here is my "paste as quotation:" > >> I tried what you said, by copying something from notepad with no line >> length and this is how it looks using a right mouse click and >> selecting paste as quotation. A question : Where did you fi

This is the beginning of the Gamma testing of SM 2.2

Now with the release of the auto upgrade script from 2.0.14 to 2.2 begins the testing of 2.2 by the actual using public. Now all the gratuitous UI changes as well as the more serious bugs crawl out of the woodwork (the code) and begin to be reported. In previous version upgrades, there might have

Re: 2.2 scrolling and right click issues

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/22/2011 2:42 AM, dsavitsk wrote: I just installed 2.2 or SeaMonkey, and the center mounse button on a Thinkpad no longer scrolls. ... Plus, right clicking the tab bar no longer opens a new tab. If you mean there is no longer a context

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

JeffM wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: The forward charge by the bull elephants to introduce new features is all well and good. But I'd like to see an army with brooms and pooper scoopers clean up the field between the charging elephants and us the plodding following mass of users. So th

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Mr. Gallagher's UA string indicates SM 2.0.14 So the politically correct answer is that he's on an obsolete, superceded version. Instruct him to install the pre-release 2.3 beta. :/ :\ Perhaps, perhaps, that will help. :) Others

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

GerardJan wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Example: <http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=r&c=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Example: The map pane is blank but the rest of the pa

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would suffice. Up

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

JeffM wrote: JeffM wrote: Hmmm. I've already used this analogy once today (elsewhere). Sometimes it only takes ONE individual to affect a change: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: OK, so if I dedicate my life to making sure everyone knows that it's "Eff

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 18/07/2011 12:50, Philip Chee wrote: On 18/07/2011 10:46, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: All right, then where does the developer council/ governing body publish the details of the planned changes to be introduced in the next release, so that

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

JeffM wrote: JeffM wrote: those folks who are prone to complaining *should* be the ones who point out shortcomings **when something can more easily be done about those** i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**. Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: All right , then where does the developer coouncil

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

JeffM wrote: JeffM wrote: Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey, I note that they never mention the authors' participation in the Release Candidate trial/review process. Jay Garcia wrote: What else is required other than to be a "user", A critique that comes as late as so many

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

Jens Hatlak wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: In SM 2.1.1pre if I select the Collected Addresses book, pick an address I can drag and drop the address into any other book. And it happens right away, and the book name highlights so I'm sure which book I'm dropping into, and t

Re: Corrupt file

Gerald Ross wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 11/07/2011 12:06, Gerald Ross told the world: I noticed a file named places.sqlite.corrupt. Can this be safely deleted? It is much larger than the places.sqlite file. Well, from what I understand this is what happens when Seamonkey is u

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-07-10 8:52 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote: ... SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable. But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had a chance to spread yet. Of course

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote: ... SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable. But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had a chance to spread yet. Of course it may be declared stable by edict, with all fixes later, in future versions, mix

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 09/07/2011 12:41, Ray_Net told the world: This is exactly my opinion ... developpers are only interested to implement new gadgets instead of fixing bugs. SM is full of bugs that would never been corrected ... because those bug did not stop SM working. But t

Re: Not the inspired by Chrome, Firefox style versioning system please!

Rex wrote: Firefox went from version 4 to version 5 in less than 2 months - in imitation of Google Chrome, who seem to be incrementing the version every other week. Please tell me Seamonkey isn't going to do the same thing so that by the end of the year we're up to version 3.5 or 4, and 5 by next

Re: Import embargoes against TB5 and FF5?

Graham P Davis wrote: I thought I'd have another try with Seamonkey 2.1 but ran into a couple of problems. (1) I thought I saw SM say it was importing FF5 bookmarks but must have been mistaken. I know other browsers can't manage that trick but would have thought another Mozilla product would hav

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 Release

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/7/2011 11:46 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the new

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 Release

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies s

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

cyberzen wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: cyberzen wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj a écrit : I'm using SM 2.0.14 . For this account according to the account settings: - I am connecting to pop.att.yahoo.net:995 . - The outgoing server (SMTP) is urj...@bellsouth.net - smtp.att.y... (I'm guess

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 4:46 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I'm using SM 2.0.14 . For this account according to the account settings: - I am connecting to pop.att.yahoo.net:995 . - The outgoing server (SMTP) is urj...@bellsouth.net - smtp.att.y... (I'm guess

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

S Slicer wrote: Lee wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Recently my system has begun to issue the following error when I try to send out emails on this account: "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.att.yahoo.com. It doe

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:46:32 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: So. Under the new accelerated version release schedule, When should we expect SM 2.3 ? :) :) :) Between 6 and 6.5 weeks from "today&quo

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Ray_Net wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the

Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

I'm using SM 2.0.14 . For this account according to the account settings: - I am connecting to pop.att.yahoo.net:995 . - The outgoing server (SMTP) is urj...@bellsouth.net - smtp.att.y... (I'm guessing that's smtp.att.yahoo.net . But the box for entering the entry doesn't scroll. So I can not v

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: ...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't believe that. And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on something else

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max -- likely tomorrow) and in the next 2 weeks we'll setup an automatic update from

Re: Problems with SeaMonkey 2.1

Avraham Ariel wrote: Hi, I recently upgraded SeaMonkey from Ver. 2.0.14 to 2.1. The lethal results were: 1. I lost the Status Bar while in Mail mode. It is there in BROWSING, COMPOSER, ADDRESS BOOK& CHAT ZILLA modes, but not when the Mail List is displayed. 2. While composing a msg, I used to

Re: is there a wy...

km wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 6/27/11 12:23 PM, km wrote: ... to make a header fil (sunilar to the .sig) that pits say a greeting? b Is there a way for you to ask your question in literate English? Or is English your second language? ... yes, if you count sign. b Perhaps getting a m

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 Late User-Facing Change

Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: As I understand what Justin Wood (Callek) wrote, it is that the distributed SM 2.2 will have _all_ the extensions included and, the installer will install them automatically. That means that, a non-expert/casual SM user who goes to the SM site, or is

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 Late User-Facing Change

Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: As long as during the install process of 2.2, it is made _clear_ to the client which extensions are being automatically installed, and there is a clear set of instructions for how the person can uninstall each of these extensions, (in case they wish

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 Late User-Facing Change

Lee wrote: On 6/23/11, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: I just wanted to make you all aware of a user-facing change I am being forced to make for SeaMonkey 2.2 The idea is I'd either not make it, or risk keeping users exposed to security risks far longer than should be the case. Bug 666518 (PLEASE

How do I read, traverse, a threaded list of articles?

Currently SM 2.0.14. I want to be able to read the articles in a thread in their threaded order. How do I need to set my various options in 'view' so that I can do it? Right now I have 'view' options set for: Layout: classic, thread pane, folder pane sort by: order received, ascending, threaded

Re: SM 2.0.14 says no new updates available

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote: Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update? Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet. Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly different update path. Ok. So when do you expect the re

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 23:31, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the world: I don't bother memorizing most passwords (e-mail, websites and such) -- the unimportant ones I trust to Seamonkey, the middling-important ones I save in KeePass. But the ones I do make a poi

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 01:10, PhillipJones told the world: MCBastos wrote: Funny, username and password saving is working perfectly for me on 2.1. Both with the old passwords saved before the upgrade, and with new passwords. Not for Banks and Financial Institutions.

Re: "2.1pre" (RC2) and search results--can't do much in "Search Messages" window

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/9/2011 7:32 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: I am running RC2 on Windows 7, 64-bit and find that when I use the "search messages" window, there is very little I can do with the listed search results. Click, do

Re: "2.1pre" (RC2) and search results--can't do much in "Search Messages" window

Jens Hatlak wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: I am running RC2 on Windows 7, 64-bit and find that when I use the "search messages" window, there is very little I can do with the listed search results. Click, double-click, and right-click do nothing on a search result item. Known, and fixed for the

Re: Browser no longer supported

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 5/29/2011 4:25 PM, W3BNR wrote: Personally I don't think we should have to lie about our browser. We (SeaMonkey Council) fully agree with you. That said, our users are higher priority. KaiRo (longtime project member, and Council member) has proposed, years ago,

(Correction) Re: Why does SM forward only a part of some email messages?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: SM 2.0.14 on a a Windows 7 system. I am receiving some quite large 500 kb - 1 Mb advertisement e-mails and am trying to forward one to someone. When I choose to forward in-line only a piece of the message is being

Re: Why does SM forward only a part of some email messages?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: SM 2.0.14 on a a Windows 7 system. I am receiving some quite large 500 kb - 1 Mb advertisement e-mails and am trying to forward one to someone. When I choose to forward in-line only a piece of the message is being forwarded. Is this the

Why does SM forward only a part of some email messages?

SM 2.0.14 on a a Windows 7 system. I am receiving some quite large 500 kb - 1 Mb advertisement e-mails and am trying to forward one to someone. When I choose to forward in-line only a piece of the message is being forwarded. Is this the normal designed behaviour? If so, How can I predict it? Th

Re: New Yahoo Mail

Rob Lindauer wrote: Thomas Pamin wrote: Yahoo wants me to upgrade to their new email application. When I try, it says Seamonkey is not a supported browser. How can I get the new Yahoo mail to work with Seamonkey? Odd - Yahoo (via AT&T) has always told me that I'm "unsupported" but gives me an

Re: SM 2.1b3

Robert Kaiser wrote: ejdelet...@edmullen.net schrieb: Have you guys tried your solutions? Have you tried to replicate my problem? I don't need to replicate anything, as know what the code does, because I wrote that code that forces a certain set of zoom levels. And I didn't offer a solution, a

Problems reading message threads.

- In my Inbox I have in the menu bar, View drop down, sorted set for: in order received, ascending, unthreaded. - In the view selection box I have 'all' - In the search box I enter a phrase e.g. 'vim' (which is an address fragment). This selects a whole group of messages from vim. - I set all t

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

cyberzen wrote: cyberzen a écrit : . snip snip snip .. I would suggest to make a copy of the mbox file (SM not active) first and to work on this copy. Sending a file (whatever it is) as a message attachment usually works you did not tell how the file would b

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Weird -- I just tried it myself and the two files had slightly different sizes. Wonder what's going on... Do you also see where the original and the received file differ in content ?! How some of the record

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

Rick Merrill wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I have extracted some email messages from my Inbox to a fresh mail folder. Done by: Highlighting the messages in the message list pane, Right clickin on the highlight, selecting the destination folder, (and verifying that the messages were copied

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I have extracted some email messages from my Inbox to a fresh mail folder. Done by: Highlighting the messages in the message list pane

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I have extracted some email messages from my Inbox to a fresh mail folder. Done by: Highlighting the messages in the message list pane, Right clickin on the highlight, selecting the

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I have extracted some email messages from my Inbox to a fresh mail folder. Done by: Highlighting the messages in the message list pane, Right clickin on the highlight, selecting the destination folder, (and verifying that the messages were

How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

I have extracted some email messages from my Inbox to a fresh mail folder. Done by: Highlighting the messages in the message list pane, Right clickin on the highlight, selecting the destination folder, (and verifying that the messages were copied there) Now I'd like to send the file, that is the

Re: How do I merge SM address books ?

Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-03-20 2:33 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: System is SM 2.0.12 on Win 7 x64 system. Earlier today I just noticed that sometime in the recent past my address books must have been deleted. i.e. I noticed that older addresses in both my personal and collected addresses were

Re: In a mail/news folder message search, What is ' # of matches found' supposedly counting?

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-03-20 1:38 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-03-20 10:39 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote

Re: Fonts used to display/compose mail messages and newsgroup articles ?

JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:02:51 -0400, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: SM 2.0.11 on 64 bit MS WIN 7 Ultimate. Can one control the appearance: Fonts& font-size used to display and compose email messages? If so, please poin

<    1   2   3   4   >