Norman Fuchs wrote on 10/05/2015 2:36 PM:
I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't updated because of
the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting is no longer sensible, I tried to
update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38. In both cases I am unable to view my messages
wit
On 12/10/2015 22:58, chicagofan wrote:
> I don't have that add on installed, & just discovered today [since I
> posted that earlier message] that Password Manager in SM 2.26.1 is wonky
> too. I didn't know it had changed in this version that's why I hadn't
> checked it. At first it wouldn't g
chicagofan wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I created a new profile and ran in safe mode. The mail & newsgroup
messages were just fine, as they should be, with headers & attachments
in view. I took this to indicate that some add-on was causing a
problem, so I went back to
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I tried to update from SM 2.25, which I was using, to SM
2.38. All looked OK, until I discovered that all my passwords were
gone! I tried SM 2.33, with the same result. Now I'm back to SM 2.25
and all is working fine. I'd like
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I tried to update from SM 2.25, which I was using, to SM
2.38. All looked OK, until I discovered that all my passwords were
gone! I tried SM 2.33, with the same result. Now I'm back to SM 2.25
and all is working fine. I'd like to update, but not if I have to lose
all my pa
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I created a new profile and ran in safe mode. The mail & newsgroup
messages were just fine, as they should be, with headers & attachments
in view. I took this to indicate that some add-on was causing a
problem, so I went back to the old (default) p
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I created a new profile and ran in safe mode. The mail & newsgroup
messages were just fine, as they should be, with headers & attachments
in view. I took this to indicate that some add-on was causing a
problem, so I went back to the old (default) profile and disabled a
coup
Norman Fuchs wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject:
line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have
chicagofan wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have NO
Subject:, To:, F
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have NO
Subject:, To:, From:, CC:, Date:.
On 12/10/2015 06:14, Norman Fuchs wrote:
> Norman Fuchs wrote:
>> Norman Fuchs wrote:
>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
> As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
> I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
> sa
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have NO
Subject:, To:, From:, CC:, Date:.
There is an option t
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have NO
Subject:, To:, From:, CC:, Date:.
There is an option to view Headers as all
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have NO
Subject:, To:, From:, CC:, Date:.
There is an option to view Headers as all or normal. No matte
Norman Fuchs wrote:
As I said at the end of my last message, I have NO Subject: line, so
I cannot click on any little triangle to its left. In fact, as I
said, I have NO
Subject:, To:, From:, CC:, Date:.
There is an option to view Headers as all or normal. No matter which
one I check, I get
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The attachment pane is normally hidden unless you click the little
triangle to the left of the "Subject:" line. (That triangle also reveals
details like From:, To:, etc.) Once you reveal it, you can then
right-click filenam
Norman Fuchs wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The attachment pane is normally hidden unless you click the little
triangle to the left of the "Subject:" line. (That triangle also reveals
details like From:, To:, etc.) Once you reveal it, you can then
right-click filenames to save attachments, op
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't updated
because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting is no
longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38. In both
cases I am unable to view my messages
Norman Fuchs wrote:
I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't updated
because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting is no
longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38. In both
cases I am unable to view my messages with the updates. The lis
Norman Fuchs wrote on 06/10/15 02:36:
> I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't
> updated because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting
> is no longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38.
> In both cases I am unable to view my messages wit
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Norman Fuchs wrote on 06/10/15 02:36:
I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't
updated because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting
is no longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38.
In both cases I am unable to
Mason83 wrote:
On 05/10/2015 20:36, Norman Fuchs wrote:
I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't updated
because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting is no
longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38. In both
cases I am unable to view my
On 05/10/2015 20:36, Norman Fuchs wrote:
> I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't updated
> because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting is no
> longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38. In both
> cases I am unable to view my messag
I have been running SM 2.25 (under windows 8.1), since I haven't updated
because of the sync problem. Now that I see that my waiting is no
longer sensible, I tried to update to 2.33.1 and also to 2.38. In both
cases I am unable to view my messages with the updates. The list of
folders, messa
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/21/09 06:21, NO wrote:
..
SamuelS
Oh... so you can see your e-mail "folders" which contain e-mail messages, but
when you open these messages, there appears to be no content?
What happens when you open the message, then use view -> message source (
NO wrote:
. many levels snipped ...
I think I was confused by your input. I need to be clear that you
understand that the e-mails do show up in my in-box, yet there are a few
which do not show any content or html content, which is not readable.
I have perfor
On 01/21/09 06:21, NO wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> I think I was confused by your input. I need to be clear that you
> understand that the e-mails do show up in my in-box, yet there are a few
> which do not show any content or html content, which is not readable.
>
> I have performed each step which P
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/20/09 06:13, Samuel S wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/19/09 15:14, NO wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/19/09 09:30, NO wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Samuel S wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this b
On 01/20/09 06:13, Samuel S wrote:
> Mark Hansen wrote:
>> On 01/19/09 15:14, NO wrote:
>>> Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/19/09 09:30, NO wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>> Samuel S wrote:
>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
> Hello all..
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/19/09 15:14, NO wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/19/09 09:30, NO wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Samuel S wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
T
On 01/19/09 15:14, NO wrote:
> Mark Hansen wrote:
>> On 01/19/09 09:30, NO wrote:
>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Samuel S wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>> NO wrote:
>>> Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
>>> remember
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/19/09 09:30, NO wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Samuel S wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
There are a few messages which I receive that are t
On 01/19/09 09:30, NO wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>> Samuel S wrote:
>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
> Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
> remember how to now.
>
> There are a few messages which I receive
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Samuel S wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
There are a few messages which I receive that are totally in code,
then others are blank and unreada
Samuel S wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
There are a few messages which I receive that are totally in code,
then others are blank and unreadable.
These messages are from people o
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
There are a few messages which I receive that are totally in code,
then others are blank and unreadable.
These messages are from people or organizations w
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
There are a few messages which I receive that are totally in code, then
others are blank and unreadable.
These messages are from people or organizations which I have received
before and can re
Hello all.. I have encountered this before and fixed it, yet cannot
remember how to now.
There are a few messages which I receive that are totally in code, then
others are blank and unreadable.
These messages are from people or organizations which I have received
before and can read on other
38 matches
Mail list logo
